-
Compared with single-phase multiferroic materials, magnetoelectric (ME) composites composed of piezoelectric and magnetostrictive materials have greater ME coupling, and have received widespread attention in various application fields. The employment of ME devices in wireless power transfer (WPT) applications is enticing, owing to their compactness and ability to operate at lower frequencies compared to conventional coils. However, conventional ME composites rely on permanent magnets or electromagnets to provide biased magnetic fields, resulting in problems such as loud noise, large size, and high cost, which significantly hinder the advancement of miniaturized, high-performance ME devices. To solve this problem, a self-biased ME laminated structure based on the magnetization grading effect is proposed in this work. Drawing upon the equivalent magnetization and nonlinear magnetostrictive constitutive rela-tionship, a finite element simulation model for a self-biased ME transducer operating in L-T mode has been constructed. The ME coupling performance without DC bias in both bending and stretching vibration modes is studied. Based on the model, the cor-responding experimental samples are prepared for measurement. The measured results agree with the simulation data, validating the accuracy and effectiveness of the model. The measured results show that the Metglas/Galfenol/PZT-5A structure can exhibit more significant self-biased ME effect under the stretching resonance mode than un-der bending resonance mode. Its ME coefficient attains a notable value of 10.7 V·cm-1·Oe-1 @ 99.4 kHz, while ME power coefficient reaches 5.01 μW·Oe-2 @ 97.9 kHz. Its on-load ME power coefficient can reach up to 4.62 μW·Oe-2 @ 99.3 kHz without impedance matching. When an external bias magnetic field of 25 Oe is applied, these performance indexes increase significantly to 47.06 V·cm-1·Oe-1 @ 99.4 kHz and 82.13 μW·Oe-2 @ 99.0 kHz, respectively. The simulation results further show that the performance of the self-biased ME transducer can be significantly improved by in-creasing the thickness of the high permeability layer. For instance, by increasing the Metglas layer thickness from 30 μm to 90 μm, both the ME coefficient and ME power coefficient experience notable growths, surging to 2.47 times and 6.96 times their original values, respectively. Self-biased ME transducers effectively minimize reliance on external biased magnetic fields, thereby providing a good approach for the applica-tion and advancement of ME composites in low-frequency WPT systems.
-
Keywords:
- Magnetoelectric(ME)transducer /
- self-biased ME effect /
- high permeability layer /
- ME power coefficient
-
[1] Ou Z Y, Lu C J, Yang A C, Zhou H, Cao Z Q, Zhu R R, Gao H L 2018 Sens. Ac-tuators A: Phys. 290 8
[2] Zhao Y X, Lu C J 2015 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 036101
[3] Chu Z Q, PourhosseiniAsl M, Dong S X 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 24
[4] Mukherje D, Mallic D 2023 Appl. Phys. Lett. 122 014102
[5] Du Y, Xu Y, Wu J, Qiao J, Wang Z, Hu Z, Jiang Z, Liu M 2023 IEEE Trans. An-tennas Propag. 71 2167
[6] Niu Y, Ren H 2021 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 264104
[7] Sudersan S, Arockiarajan A 2019 Compos. Struct. 223 110294
[8] Zhou Y, Li C J, Pan Y R 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 077702 (in Chinese) [周勇，李纯健，潘昱融 2018 物理学报 67 077702]
[9] Han J, Zhang J J, Gao Y W 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 466 200
[10] Yao H, Shi Y, Gao Y W 2016 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 401 1046
[11] Yang C H, Wen Y M, Li P, Bian L X 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 51 7292 (in Chinese) [阳昌海，文玉梅，李平，卞雷祥 2008 物理学报 51 7292]
[12] Dong H M, Guo H H, Li J R, Li B J, Gan X X 2023 Phys. Scr. 98 065901
[13] Shi Y, Li L, Yang Y 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 107503
[14] Lei B X, You Z X, Zhang Z D, Shi Y 2023 Acta Mech. Sin. 39 523120
[15] Niu L F, Shi Y, Gao Y W 2019 AIP Adv. 9 045216
[16] Kumar S D, Gupta S, Swain A B, Subramanian V, Padmanabhan M K, Mahajan R L 2021 J. Appl. Phys. 858 157684
[17] Truong B D, Roundy S 2020 Smart Mater. Struct. 29 085053
[18] Lage E, Kirchhof C, Hrkac V, Kienle L, Jahns R, Knöchel R, Quandt E Meyners D 2012 Nature Mater. 11 523
[19] Röbisch V, Yarar E, Urs N O, Teliban I, Knöchel R, Mccoed J, Quandt E, Meyners D 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 17B513
[20] Zhou Y, Priya S 2014 J Appl. Phys. 115 104107
[21] Zhang J J, Gao Y W 2015 Int. J. Solid. Struct. 69 291
[22] Wen Y M, Wang D, Li P, Cheng L, Wu Z Y 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 097506 (in Chinese) [文玉梅，王东，李平，陈蕾，吴治峄 2011 物理学报 60 097506]
[23] Lu C J, Li P, Wen Y M, Yang A C, Yang C, Wang D C, He W, Zhang J T 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 117503
[24] Chen L, Li P, Wen Y M, Zhu Y 2015 Compos. Struct. 119 685
[25] Lu C J, Li P, Wen Y M, Yang A C, He W, Zhang J T, Yang J, Wen J, Zhu Y, Yu M 2013 Appl. Phys. A 113 413
[26] Shi Y, Lei B X, Wang Y K, Ye J J 2022 Compos. Struct. 300 116164
[27] Zhang J, Du H, Xia X, Fang C, Weng G J 2020 Mech. Mater. 151 103609
[28] Ma J N, Xin C Z, Ma J, Lin Y H, Nan C W 2016 Mater. Res. Express 3 125012
[29] Huang D Y, Lu C J, Han B, Wang X, Li C X, Xu C B, Gui J G, Lin C H 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 263502
[30] Yang S C, Cho K H, Park C S, Priya S S 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 202904
[31] Truong B D 2020 IEEE Sens. J. 20 5322-5328
[32] Hosur S, Sriramdas R, Karan S K, Liu N, Priya S, Kiani M 2021 IEEE Trans. Bi-omed. Circuits Syst. 15 1079
[33] Saha O, Truong B D, Roundy S 2022 Smart Mater. Struct. 31 113001
[34] Kim W, Tuppen C A, Alrashdan F, Singer A, Weirnick R, Robinson J T 2023 J. Appl. Phys. 134 094103
[35] Liu X, Zheng X J 2005 Acta Mech. Sin. 21 278
[36] Li M H 2023 Master Thesis (Changchun: Jilin University) (in Chinese) [李鸣鹤 2023 硕士学位论文 (长春：吉林大学)]
[37] Xie B H, Xu G K, Xiao S Q, Yu Z J, Zhu D L 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 117501 (in Chinese) [谢冰鸿，徐国凯，肖绍球，喻忠军，朱大立 2023 物理学报 72 117501]
[38] Luo Z G 2019 Phys. Exp. Coll. 32 9 (in Chinese) [罗志高 2019 大学物理实验 32 9]
[39] Li L, Chen X M 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 072903
[40] Zhang J T, Li P, Wen Y M, He W, Yang A C, Lu C J 2014 Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 214 149
[41] Annapureddy V, Park S H, Song H, Ryu J 2023 J. Alloy. Compd. 957 170121
Metrics
- Abstract views: 212
- PDF Downloads: 14
- Cited By: 0
下载:
