Rapid preparation of Rydberg superatom W state using superadiabatic techniques

YANG Liping; WANG Jiping; DONG Li; XIU Xiaoming; JI Yanqiang

doi:10.7498/aps.74.20241694

Abstract

The W state, as a robust multipartite entangled state, plays an important role in quantum information processing, quantum network construction and quantum computing. In this paper, a three-level ladder-type Rydberg atomic system is placed into a Rydberg blocking sphere to form a superatom. Each superatom has many collective states including just one Rydberg excitation constrained by the Rydberg blockade effect. In the weak cavity field limit, at most one atom can be pumped into excited state, then we can describe the superatom by using a three-level ladder-type system. Afterwards we encode quantum information about the effective energy levels of Rydberg superatoms and propose a fast scheme for preparing the Rydberg superatom W state based on the superadiabatic iterative technique and quantum Zeno dynamics.This scheme can be achieved in only one step by controlling the laser pulses. In this scheme, the superatoms are trapped in spatially separated cavities connected by optical fibers, thereby greatly improving the feasibility of experimental manipulation. A remarkable feature is that it does not need to accurately control experimental parameters and interaction time. Meanwhile, the form of counterdiabatic Hamiltonian is the same as that of the effective Hamiltonian. Through numerical simulations, the fidelity of this scheme can reach 99.94%. Even considering decoherence effects, including atomic spontaneous emission and photon leakage, the fidelity can still exceed 97.5%, thereby further demonstrating the strong robustness of the solution. In addition, the Rabi frequency can be characterized as a linear superposition of Gaussian functions, and this representation significantly alleviates the complexity encountered in practical experiments. Futhermore, we also analyze the influence of parameter fluctuations on the fidelity, and the results show that this scheme is robust against parameter fluctuations. Finally, the present scheme is extended to the case of N Rydberg superatoms, which shows the scalability of our scheme.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

College of Physical Science and Technology, Bohai University, Jinzhou 121013, China

Corresponding author: JI Yanqiang, jiyanqiang@qymail.bhu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11947078), the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China (Grant No. 2020-BS-234), and the Department of Education of Liaoning Province, China (Grant Nos. LJ212410167045, LJKZ1015).

FullText HTML

References

[1]	Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W, Zbinden H 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 145 Google Scholar
[2]	Markham D, Sanders B C 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 042309 Google Scholar
[3]	Bennett C H, Brassard G, Crépeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A, Wootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895 Google Scholar
[4]	Luo Y H, Zhong H S, Erhard M, Wang X L, Peng L C, Krenn M, Jiang X, Li L, Liu N L, Lu C Y, Zeilinger A, Pan J W 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 070505 Google Scholar
[5]	Xia Y, Song J, Lu P M, Song H S 2010 JOSA B 27 A1 Google Scholar
[6]	Ekert A K 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661 Google Scholar
[7]	Bennett C H, Brassard G, Mermin N D 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 557 Google Scholar
[8]	Long G L, Liu X S 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 032302 Google Scholar
[9]	Scarani V, Bechmann-Pasquinucci H, Cerf N J, Dušek M, Lütkenhaus N, Peev M 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1301 Google Scholar
[10]	Briegel H J, Browne D E, Dür W, Raussendorf R, Van den Nest M 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 19 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhao P Z, Cui X D, Xu G, Sjöqvist E, Tong D 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 052316 Google Scholar
[12]	Su S L, Gao Y, Liang E, Zhang S 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 022319 Google Scholar
[13]	Wu J L, Su S L, Wang Y, Song J, Xia Y, Jiang Y Y 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 1200 Google Scholar
[14]	Li X H, Deng F G, Zhou H Y 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 054302 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhu A D, Xia Y, Fan Q B, Zhang S 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 022338 Google Scholar
[16]	Li T, Long G L 2020 New J. Phys. 22 063017 Google Scholar
[17]	Greenberger D M, Horne M A, Zeilinger A 1989 In Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe (Springer) pp69–72
[18]	Shao X Q, Liu F, Xue X W, Mu W, Li W B 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl 20 014014 Google Scholar
[19]	Dür W, Vidal G, Cirac J I 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 062314 Google Scholar
[20]	Cabello A 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 032108 Google Scholar
[21]	Agrawal P, Pati A 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 062320 Google Scholar
[22]	Wang A, Wei Y Z, Li Z Y, Jiang M 2023 IET Quantum Commun. 4 200 Google Scholar
[23]	Renner R 2008 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 6 1 Google Scholar
[24]	Lo H K, Ma X, Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504 Google Scholar
[25]	Lipinska V, Murta G, Wehner S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 052320 Google Scholar
[26]	Miguel-Ramiro J, Riera-Sàbat F, Dür W 2023 PRX Quantum 4 040323 Google Scholar
[27]	Su S L, Shao X Q, Wang H F, Zhang S 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 054302 Google Scholar
[28]	Han J X, Wu J L, Wang Y, Xia Y, Jiang Y Y, Song J 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 032402 Google Scholar
[29]	Shao X Q, Wang Z, Liu H, Yi X 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 032307 Google Scholar
[30]	Shao X Q, Su S L, Li L, Nath R, Wu J H, Li W 2024 Appl. Phys. Rev. 11 031320 Google Scholar
[31]	Shao Q P, Wang J, Ji Y, Liu Y, Dong L, Xiu X M 2023 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 41 143 Google Scholar
[32]	Zhang W Y, Wang C Q, Ji Y Q, Shao Q P, Wang J P, Wang J, Yang L P, Dong L, Xiu X M 2024 Adv. Quantum Technol. 7 2300140 Google Scholar
[33]	Saffman M, Walker T G, Mølmer K 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 2313 Google Scholar
[34]	Beguin L, Vernier A, Chicireanu R, Lahaye T, Browaeys A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 263201 Google Scholar
[35]	Xing T, Zhao P, Tong D 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 012618 Google Scholar
[36]	Lukin M D, Fleischhauer M, Cote R, Duan L, Jaksch D, Cirac J I, Zoller P 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 037901 Google Scholar
[37]	Urban E, Johnson T A, Henage T, Isenhower L, Yavuz D, Walker T, Saffman M 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 110 Google Scholar
[38]	Gaëtan A, Miroshnychenko Y, Wilk T, Chotia A, Viteau M, Comparat D, Pillet P, Browaeys A, Grangier P 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 115 Google Scholar
[39]	Wilk T, Gaëtan A, Evellin C, Wolters J, Miroshnychenko Y, Grangier P, Browaeys A 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 010502 Google Scholar
[40]	Dudin Y O, Li L, Bariani F, Kuzmich A 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 790 Google Scholar
[41]	Shao X Q, Wu J, Yi X 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 062339 Google Scholar
[42]	Su S L, Li W 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 033716 Google Scholar
[43]	Wu J L, Wang Y, Han J X, Su S L, Xia Y, Jiang Y, Song J 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 012601 Google Scholar
[44]	Zeiher J, Schauß P, Hild S, Macrì T, Bloch I, Gross C 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 031015 Google Scholar
[45]	Yang L, Wang J, Ji Y, Wang J, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Dong L, Xiu X 2024 Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139 1 Google Scholar
[46]	Xu W, Venkatramani A V, Cantú S H, Šumarac T, Klüsener V, Lukin M D, Vuletić V 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 050501 Google Scholar
[47]	Zhao P Z, Wu X, Xing T, Xu G, Tong D 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 032313 Google Scholar
[48]	Paris-Mandoki A, Braun C, Kumlin J, Tresp C, Mirgorodskiy I, Christaller F, Büchler H P, Hofferberth S 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7 041010 Google Scholar
[49]	Liu Y L, Ji Y Q, Han X, Cui W X, Zhang S, Wang H F 2023 Adv. Quantum Technol. 6 2200173 Google Scholar
[50]	Baksic A, Ribeiro H, Clerk A A 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 230503 Google Scholar
[51]	Wu J L, Ji X, Zhang S 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 46255 Google Scholar
[52]	Chen Y H, Qin W, Wang X, Miranowicz A, Nori F 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 023602 Google Scholar
[53]	Giannelli L, Arimondo E 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 033419 Google Scholar
[54]	王雪梅, 张安琪, 赵生妹 2022 物理学报 71 150301 Google Scholar Wang X M, Zhang A Q, Zhao S M 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 150301 Google Scholar
[55]	Berry M V 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 365303 Google Scholar
[56]	Ibáñez S, Chen X, Muga J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 043402 Google Scholar
[57]	Song X K, Ai Q, Qiu J, Deng F G 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 052324 Google Scholar
[58]	Huang B H, Chen Y H, Wu Q C, Song J, Xia Y 2016 Laser Phys. Lett. 13 105202 Google Scholar
[59]	Wu J L, Su S L, Ji X, Zhang S 2017 Ann. Phys. 386 34 Google Scholar
[60]	Löw R, Weimer H, Nipper J, Balewski J B, Butscher B, Büchler H P, Pfau T 2012 J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 45 113001 Google Scholar
[61]	Su S L, Sun L N, Liu B J, Yan L L, Yung M H, Li W, Feng M 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 044007 Google Scholar
[62]	Du F F, Fan Z G, Ren X M, Ma M, Liu W Y 2024 Chin. Phys. B 34 010303 Google Scholar
[63]	Shao X Q 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 053118 Google Scholar
[64]	Facchi P, Pascazio S 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 080401 Google Scholar
[65]	Wu J L, Song C, Xu J, Yu L, Ji X, Zhang S 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 3663 Google Scholar
[66]	Shore B W 2017 Adv. Opt. Photonics 9 563 Google Scholar
[67]	Zhang X, Isenhower L, Gill A, Walker T, Saffman M 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 030306 Google Scholar
[68]	Isenhower L, Urban E, Zhang X, Gill A, Henage T, Johnson T A, Walker T, Saffman M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 010503 Google Scholar
[69]	Guerlin C, Brion E, Esslinger T, Mølmer K 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 053832 Google Scholar
[70]	Zhang X F, Sun Q, Wen Y C, Liu W M, Eggert S, Ji A C 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 090402 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 (a)单个里德伯原子能级结构图; (b)里德伯超级原子的等效能级结构图

Figure 1. (a) Energy level structure diagram of a single Rydberg atom; (b) the equivalent energy level structure diagram of Rydberg superatom.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 里德伯超级原子与腔系统的示意图, SA是里德伯超级原子, $ \varOmega_k $是第k个腔中经典场的拉比频率

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the structure of the Rydberg superatom-cavity system, SA denots the Rydberg superatom, and $ \varOmega_k $ is the classical field Rabi frequency in the k-th cavity.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 $ \theta_1(t) $随时间的变化关系. 选取的参数为$ t_0 = 0.14 T $和$ t_{\mathrm{c}} = 0.19 T $

Figure 3. The $ \theta_1(t) $ as a function of the time. The parameters $ t_0 = 0.14 T $ and $ t_{\mathrm{c}} = 0.19 T $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 $ \theta_2(t) $随时间的变化关系. 选取的参数为$ t_0 = 0.14 T $和$ t_{\mathrm{c}} = 0.19 T $

Figure 4. The $ \theta_2(t) $ as a function of the time. The parameters $ t_0 = 0.14 T $and $ t_{\mathrm{c}} = 0.19 T $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 $ \varOmega_0(T^{-1}) $对保真度$ F(T) $的影响图. 当$ \varOmega_0 = 8 T^{-1} $时, 保真度$ F(T) = 0.9994 $

Figure 5. The influence of $ \varOmega_0(T^{-1}) $ on fidelity $ F(T) $. When $ \varOmega_0 = 8 T^{-1} $, the fidelity $ F(T) = 0.9994 $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 (a)对比脉冲$ \varOmega'_1(t) $和拟合的高斯脉冲$ \widetilde{\varOmega}_1(t) $; (b)对比脉冲$ \varOmega'_2(t) $和拟合的高斯脉冲$ \widetilde{\varOmega}_2(t) $

Figure 6. (a) Comparing the pulse $ \varOmega '_1 (t) $ and the fitting of gaussian pulse $ \widetilde {\varOmega} _1 (t) $; (b) comparing the pulse $ \varOmega '_2 (t) $ and the fitting of gaussian pulse $ \widetilde {\varOmega} _2 (t) $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 W态的保真度在超绝热迭代$ T = 8/\varOmega_0 $、绝热演化$ T = 8/\varOmega_0 $、绝热演化$ T = 35/\varOmega_0 $三种不同情况下随时间的变化

Figure 7. Under the three different conditions: superadiabatic iteration $ T = 8/\varOmega_0 $, adiabatic evolution $ T = 8/\varOmega_0 $ and adiabatic evolution $ T = 35/\varOmega_0 $, the fidelity of W state as a function of the time.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 哈密顿量$ H_{{\mathrm{tot}}} $的控制下的W态的保真度与$ \kappa/\lambda $和$ \gamma/\lambda $的关系, $ T = 8/\varOmega_0, \varOmega_0 = 0.1\lambda $

Figure 8. The relationship between the fidelity of the W state and $ \kappa/\lambda $, $ \gamma/\lambda $ by the Hamiltonian $ H_{{\mathrm{tot}}} $, $ T = 8 / \varOmega_0, $$ \varOmega_0 = 0.1\lambda $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 (a)保真度随$ \delta \widetilde{\varOmega}_1 $和$ \delta \widetilde{\varOmega}_2 $的变化; (b)保真度随$ \delta \lambda $和$ \delta v $的变化

Figure 9. (a) The fidelity versus $ \delta \widetilde{\varOmega}_1 $ and $ \delta \widetilde{\varOmega}_2 $; (b) the fidelity versus $ \delta \lambda $ and $ \delta v $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 N个里德伯超级原子-腔系统结构型的示意图, 每个里德伯超级原子被分别放置在不同的真空腔中, 第2到第N个腔均与第1个腔相连, $ \varOmega_N $是第N个腔中经典场驱动的拉比频率

Figure 10. Schematic diagram illustrating the structure of N-Rydberg superatom-cavity system, each of the Rydberg superatom is placed in a separate vacuum cavity, with cavities 2 through N all connected to cavity 1, $ \varOmega_N $ is the classical field-driven Rabi frequency in the N-th cavity.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Gisin N, Ribordy G, Tittel W, Zbinden H 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 145 Google Scholar
[2]	Markham D, Sanders B C 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 042309 Google Scholar
[3]	Bennett C H, Brassard G, Crépeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A, Wootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895 Google Scholar
[4]	Luo Y H, Zhong H S, Erhard M, Wang X L, Peng L C, Krenn M, Jiang X, Li L, Liu N L, Lu C Y, Zeilinger A, Pan J W 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 070505 Google Scholar
[5]	Xia Y, Song J, Lu P M, Song H S 2010 JOSA B 27 A1 Google Scholar
[6]	Ekert A K 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661 Google Scholar
[7]	Bennett C H, Brassard G, Mermin N D 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 557 Google Scholar
[8]	Long G L, Liu X S 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 032302 Google Scholar
[9]	Scarani V, Bechmann-Pasquinucci H, Cerf N J, Dušek M, Lütkenhaus N, Peev M 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1301 Google Scholar
[10]	Briegel H J, Browne D E, Dür W, Raussendorf R, Van den Nest M 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 19 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhao P Z, Cui X D, Xu G, Sjöqvist E, Tong D 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 052316 Google Scholar
[12]	Su S L, Gao Y, Liang E, Zhang S 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 022319 Google Scholar
[13]	Wu J L, Su S L, Wang Y, Song J, Xia Y, Jiang Y Y 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 1200 Google Scholar
[14]	Li X H, Deng F G, Zhou H Y 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 054302 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhu A D, Xia Y, Fan Q B, Zhang S 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 022338 Google Scholar
[16]	Li T, Long G L 2020 New J. Phys. 22 063017 Google Scholar
[17]	Greenberger D M, Horne M A, Zeilinger A 1989 In Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe (Springer) pp69–72
[18]	Shao X Q, Liu F, Xue X W, Mu W, Li W B 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl 20 014014 Google Scholar
[19]	Dür W, Vidal G, Cirac J I 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 062314 Google Scholar
[20]	Cabello A 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 032108 Google Scholar
[21]	Agrawal P, Pati A 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 062320 Google Scholar
[22]	Wang A, Wei Y Z, Li Z Y, Jiang M 2023 IET Quantum Commun. 4 200 Google Scholar
[23]	Renner R 2008 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 6 1 Google Scholar
[24]	Lo H K, Ma X, Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504 Google Scholar
[25]	Lipinska V, Murta G, Wehner S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 052320 Google Scholar
[26]	Miguel-Ramiro J, Riera-Sàbat F, Dür W 2023 PRX Quantum 4 040323 Google Scholar
[27]	Su S L, Shao X Q, Wang H F, Zhang S 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 054302 Google Scholar
[28]	Han J X, Wu J L, Wang Y, Xia Y, Jiang Y Y, Song J 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 032402 Google Scholar
[29]	Shao X Q, Wang Z, Liu H, Yi X 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 032307 Google Scholar
[30]	Shao X Q, Su S L, Li L, Nath R, Wu J H, Li W 2024 Appl. Phys. Rev. 11 031320 Google Scholar
[31]	Shao Q P, Wang J, Ji Y, Liu Y, Dong L, Xiu X M 2023 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 41 143 Google Scholar
[32]	Zhang W Y, Wang C Q, Ji Y Q, Shao Q P, Wang J P, Wang J, Yang L P, Dong L, Xiu X M 2024 Adv. Quantum Technol. 7 2300140 Google Scholar
[33]	Saffman M, Walker T G, Mølmer K 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 2313 Google Scholar
[34]	Beguin L, Vernier A, Chicireanu R, Lahaye T, Browaeys A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 263201 Google Scholar
[35]	Xing T, Zhao P, Tong D 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 012618 Google Scholar
[36]	Lukin M D, Fleischhauer M, Cote R, Duan L, Jaksch D, Cirac J I, Zoller P 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 037901 Google Scholar
[37]	Urban E, Johnson T A, Henage T, Isenhower L, Yavuz D, Walker T, Saffman M 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 110 Google Scholar
[38]	Gaëtan A, Miroshnychenko Y, Wilk T, Chotia A, Viteau M, Comparat D, Pillet P, Browaeys A, Grangier P 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 115 Google Scholar
[39]	Wilk T, Gaëtan A, Evellin C, Wolters J, Miroshnychenko Y, Grangier P, Browaeys A 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 010502 Google Scholar
[40]	Dudin Y O, Li L, Bariani F, Kuzmich A 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 790 Google Scholar
[41]	Shao X Q, Wu J, Yi X 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 062339 Google Scholar
[42]	Su S L, Li W 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 033716 Google Scholar
[43]	Wu J L, Wang Y, Han J X, Su S L, Xia Y, Jiang Y, Song J 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 012601 Google Scholar
[44]	Zeiher J, Schauß P, Hild S, Macrì T, Bloch I, Gross C 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 031015 Google Scholar
[45]	Yang L, Wang J, Ji Y, Wang J, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Dong L, Xiu X 2024 Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139 1 Google Scholar
[46]	Xu W, Venkatramani A V, Cantú S H, Šumarac T, Klüsener V, Lukin M D, Vuletić V 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 050501 Google Scholar
[47]	Zhao P Z, Wu X, Xing T, Xu G, Tong D 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 032313 Google Scholar
[48]	Paris-Mandoki A, Braun C, Kumlin J, Tresp C, Mirgorodskiy I, Christaller F, Büchler H P, Hofferberth S 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7 041010 Google Scholar
[49]	Liu Y L, Ji Y Q, Han X, Cui W X, Zhang S, Wang H F 2023 Adv. Quantum Technol. 6 2200173 Google Scholar
[50]	Baksic A, Ribeiro H, Clerk A A 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 230503 Google Scholar
[51]	Wu J L, Ji X, Zhang S 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 46255 Google Scholar
[52]	Chen Y H, Qin W, Wang X, Miranowicz A, Nori F 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 023602 Google Scholar
[53]	Giannelli L, Arimondo E 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 033419 Google Scholar
[54]	王雪梅, 张安琪, 赵生妹 2022 物理学报 71 150301 Google Scholar Wang X M, Zhang A Q, Zhao S M 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 150301 Google Scholar
[55]	Berry M V 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 365303 Google Scholar
[56]	Ibáñez S, Chen X, Muga J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 043402 Google Scholar
[57]	Song X K, Ai Q, Qiu J, Deng F G 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 052324 Google Scholar
[58]	Huang B H, Chen Y H, Wu Q C, Song J, Xia Y 2016 Laser Phys. Lett. 13 105202 Google Scholar
[59]	Wu J L, Su S L, Ji X, Zhang S 2017 Ann. Phys. 386 34 Google Scholar
[60]	Löw R, Weimer H, Nipper J, Balewski J B, Butscher B, Büchler H P, Pfau T 2012 J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 45 113001 Google Scholar
[61]	Su S L, Sun L N, Liu B J, Yan L L, Yung M H, Li W, Feng M 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 044007 Google Scholar
[62]	Du F F, Fan Z G, Ren X M, Ma M, Liu W Y 2024 Chin. Phys. B 34 010303 Google Scholar
[63]	Shao X Q 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 053118 Google Scholar
[64]	Facchi P, Pascazio S 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 080401 Google Scholar
[65]	Wu J L, Song C, Xu J, Yu L, Ji X, Zhang S 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 3663 Google Scholar
[66]	Shore B W 2017 Adv. Opt. Photonics 9 563 Google Scholar
[67]	Zhang X, Isenhower L, Gill A, Walker T, Saffman M 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 030306 Google Scholar
[68]	Isenhower L, Urban E, Zhang X, Gill A, Henage T, Johnson T A, Walker T, Saffman M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 010503 Google Scholar
[69]	Guerlin C, Brion E, Esslinger T, Mølmer K 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 053832 Google Scholar
[70]	Zhang X F, Sun Q, Wen Y C, Liu W M, Eggert S, Ji A C 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 090402 Google Scholar

[1]	Guo Peng-Liang, Xi Shun, Gao Cheng-Yan. Hyperentanglement W state concentration for polarization–time-bin photon systems with linear optics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2025, 74(13): . doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241642
[2]	Liu Yao, He Jun, Su Nan, Cai Ting, Liu Zhi-Hui, Diao Wen-Ting, Wang Jun-Min. A 509 nm pulsed laser system for Rydberg excitation of cesium atoms. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(6): 060303. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222286
[3]	Shen Xing-Chen, Liu Yang, Chen Qi, Lü Hang, Xu Hai-Feng. Rydberg state excitation of atoms and molecules in ultrafast intense laser field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(23): 233202. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221258
[4]	Ji Yan-Qiang, Wang Jie, Liu Ying-Li, Zhang Da-Wei, Xiao Rui-Jie, Dong Li, Xiu Xiao-Ming. Fast generation of three-atom singlet state with Rydberg superatom. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(12): 120301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201841
[5]	Yu Wan-Rang, Ji Xin. Superadiabatic scheme for fast generating Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state of three superconducting qubits. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(3): 030302. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181922
[6]	Zhao Jun-Long, Zhang Yi-Dan, Yang Ming. Influence of noice on tripartite quantum probe state. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(14): 140302. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180040
[7]	Pei Dong-Liang, He Jun, Wang Jie-Ying, Wang Jia-Chao, Wang Jun-Min. Measurement of the fine structure of cesium Rydberg state. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(19): 193701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.193701
[8]	Fan Rong-Hua, Guo Bang-Hong, Guo Jian-Jun, Zhang Cheng-Xian, Zhang Wen-Jie, Du Ge. Entangled W state of multi degree of freedom system based on orbital angular momentum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(14): 140301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.140301
[9]	Sun Jiang, Sun Juan, Wang Ying, Su Hong-Xin. Measurement of the argon-gas-induced broadening and shifting of the barium Rydberg levels by two-photon resonant nondegenerate four-wave mixing. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(11): 114214. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.114214
[10]	Jiang Li-Juan, Zhang Xian-Zhou, Ma Huan-Qiang, Jia Guang-Rui, Zhang Yong-Hui, Xia Li-Hua. Population transfer of high excited states of Rydberg sodium atoms in a chirped microwave field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(4): 043101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.043101
[11]	He Yong-Lin, Zhou Xiao-Xin, Li Xiao-Yong. Study of Rydberg states of lithium in a static electric field using B-spline functions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(1): 116-123. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.116
[12]	Zhou Xiao-Qing, Wu Yun-Wen. Discussion on building the net of quantum teleportation using three-particle entangled states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(4): 1881-1887. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1881
[13]	Sun Jiang, Zuo Zhan-Chun, Guo Qing-Lin, Wang Ying-Long, Huai Su-Fang, Wang Ying, Fu Pan-Ming. Observation of Rydberg series of neutral barium by two-photon resonent nondegenerate four-wave mixing. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(1): 221-225. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.221
[14]	Huang Yong-Chang, Liu Min. General WGHZ state and its disentanglement and probabilistic teleportation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(10): 4517-4523. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4517
[15]	Fang Da-Wei, Dao Chang-Jian, Li Jing, Wang Yun-Xian, Chu Xiao-Feng, Xu Yun-Fei, Zhang Shen. . Acta Physica Sinica, 1995, 44(3): 365-374. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.365
[16]	Dai Chang-Jian, Shu Xiao-Wu, Li Qian, Zhang Sen, Fang Da-Wei. . Acta Physica Sinica, 1995, 44(5): 678-684. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.678
[17]	DING GUANG-LIANG, LIU BING-MO, WANG JIA-MIN, GONG SHUN-SHENG. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF RELATIONS BETWEEN ｜ml｜ AND FIELD STARK IONIZATION THRESHOLD IN RYDBERG Cs ATOMS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1994, 43(11): 1754-1758. doi: 10.7498/aps.43.1754
[18]	LI JING, XU YUN-FEI, WANG YUN-XIAN, ZHANG SEN. DEPENDENCE OF FIELD-IONIZATION THRESHOLD ON \|ml\| FOR RYDBERG STATES OF Sr ATOM. Acta Physica Sinica, 1993, 42(2): 231-236. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.231
[19]	LIU HONG, CHEN AI-QIU, LI BAI-WEN. THE l-MIXING CROSS SECTION OF RYDBERG STATES OF ATOMIC Rb AND THE SCALING LAW. Acta Physica Sinica, 1991, 40(12): 1909-1914. doi: 10.7498/aps.40.1909
[20]	Li Wen-bai Chen Nuan-qiu Zhang Xue-rong Zhang Cheng-xiu. WAVE FUNCTIONS FOR AND OSCILLATOR STRENGTHS BETWEEN HIGH RYDBERG STATES OF Na ATOM. Acta Physica Sinica, 1987, 36(8): 998-1003. doi: 10.7498/aps.36.998

Catalog

Vol. 74, Issue 10 - 2025-05-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 569
PDF Downloads: 39
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板