-
Semiconductor quantum dot (QD) at low temperature will create excitons with sharp spectral lines for single photon emission. Optical fiber coupling avoids scanning for positioning and vibration influence in low-temperature confocal setup, and is a key technology in realizing the plug-play and componentization of QD single photon sources. For the fiber coupling techniques, the lateral coupling of a photonic crystal cavity or waveguide with a tapered fiber, or normal coupling of a QD chip with a tapered facet fiber in a large numerical aperture has been developed based on mask in a micro-region; however, the above techniques require multi-dimensional precise adjusting in order to avoid abnormally bending a soft fiber to realize alignment and high-efficiency coupling. Ceramic ferrule or silica V-shaped groove-mounted fiber has a large smooth facet and no bending; it can collect light in the normal direction by being aligned with bonding QD chip; V-shaped groove-mounted fiber array also enables a random adhesion and avoid scanning for alignment, which is simple in technique. This work is based on the previous realization of single photon output by random adhesion of few-pair DBR micropillar chip with V-shaped groove-mounted fiber array, and uses many-pair DBR cavity chip with theoretical simulation optimization to improve the normal light extraction and its fiber collection efficiency, and greatly improves the fiber output of single photon count rate.
-
Keywords:
- quantum dot single photon source /
- optical fiber coupling /
- distributed Bragg reflector cavity /
- light normal extraction
[1] Wang H, He Y, Li Y H, Su Z E, Li B, Huang H L, Ding X, Chen M C, Liu C, Qin J, Li J P, He Y M, Schneider C, Kamp M, Peng C Z, Hofling S, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2017 Nat. Photonics 11 361
Google Scholar
[2] Pooley M A, Ellis D J P, Patel R B, Bennett A J, Chan K H A, Farrer I, Ritchie D A, Shields A J 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 211103
Google Scholar
[3] Feng L, Zhang M, Xiong X, Chen Y, Wu H, Li M, Guo G P, Guo G C, Dai D X, Ren X F 2019 npj Quant. Inform. 5 2
Google Scholar
[4] Lu L, Xia L, Chen Z, Chen L, Yu T, Tao T, Ma W, Pan Y, Cai X, Lu Y, Zhu S, Ma X 2020 npj Quant. Inform. 6 30
Google Scholar
[5] Paesani S, Borghi M, Signorini S, Maïnos A, Pavesi L, Laing A 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 2505
Google Scholar
[6] Wu R, Lin J, Wang M, Fang Z, Chu W, Zhang J, Zhou J, Cheng Y 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 4698
Google Scholar
[7] Qiang X, Zhou X, Wang J, Wilkes C M, Loke T, Gara S O, Kling L, Marshall G D, Santagati R, Ralph T C, Wang J B, O’Brien J L, Thompson M G, Matthews J C F 2018 Nat. Photonics 12 534
Google Scholar
[8] Najafi F, Mower J, Harris N C, Bellei F, Dane A, Lee C, Hu X, Kharel P, Marsili F, Assefa S, Berggren K K, Englund D 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 5873
Google Scholar
[9] Zhang G, Haw J Y, Cai H, Xu F, Assad S M, Fitzsimons J F, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Yu S, Wu J, Ser W, Kwek L C, Liu A Q 2016 Optica 3 1274
Google Scholar
[10] Chen Z S, Ma B, Shang X J, Ni H Q, Wang J L, Niu Z C 2017 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12 378
Google Scholar
[11] Lee C M, Lim H J, Schneider C, Maier S, Hofling S, Kamp M, Lee Y H 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 14309
Google Scholar
[12] Davanco M I, Rakher M T, Wegscheider W, Schuh D, Badolato A, Srinivasan K 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 121101
Google Scholar
[13] Chonan S, Kato S, Aoki T 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 4785
Google Scholar
[14] Ma B, Chen Z S, Wei S H, Shang X J, Ni H Q, Niu Z C 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 142104
Google Scholar
[15] Muller A, Flagg E B, Metcalfe M, Lawall J, Solomon G S 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 173101
Google Scholar
[16] Gazzano O, Vasconcellos S M, Arnold C, Nowak A, Galopin E, Sagnes I, Lanco L, Lemaitre A, Senellart P 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 1425
Google Scholar
[17] Ding X, He Y M, Duan Z C, Gregersen N, Chen M C, Unsleber S, Maier S, Schneider C, Kamp M, Hofling S, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 020401
Google Scholar
[18] Li S L, Chen Y, Shang X J, Yu Y, Yang J W, Huang J H, Su X B, Shen J X, Sun B Q, Ni H Q, Su X L, Wang K Y, Niu Z C 2020 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 15 145
Google Scholar
[19] Shang X J, Ma B, Ni H Q, Chen Z S, Li S L, Chen Y, He X W, Su X L, Shi Y J, Niu Z C 2020 AIP Adv. 10 085126
Google Scholar
[20] Makhov I S, Panevin V Y, Sofronov A N, Firsov D A, Vorobjev L E, Vinnichenko M Y, Vasil'ev A P, Maleev N A 2017 Superlattices and Microstruct. 112 79
Google Scholar
[21] Typical Properties of Norland Optical Adhesive (NOA) 61, Norland Products Inc. www.norlandprod.com/adhesives/NOA%2061.html [2020-12-10]
-
图 1 SQD光纤耦合方案
Figure 1. Schemes of fiber coupling with SQDs.
图 2 单模光纤粘合SQD微柱的收光模拟 (a) 静态腔场分布; (b)左: 腔内(inner)和顶部(top)的静态腔场强度; 右: 光纤提取效率随上DBR对数的变化. 同时列出共聚焦收光效率(空心点)作比较, (c) 模拟结构示意图
Figure 2. Simulation of light collection from single mode fiber-bonded SQD micropillar: (a) Steady cavity field distribution; (b) Left: steady cavity mode intensity inside (inner) or on top of (top) the cavity; right: light extraction efficiency of fiber, as a function of the upper DBR pairs. Red hollow points: that of confocal setup for comparison; (c) schematic of the simulation structure.
图 3 光纤耦合量子点单光子源的二阶关联函数测试装置
Figure 3. Measurement setup of second-order correlation function of a fiber-coupled SQD single-photon source.
图 4 光纤粘合SQD样品A的光谱. 分别在10和77 K下用高(红线)和低(黑线)激发功率测试; 插图: 滤光后的分束单路光谱和
${g}^{2}(\tau)$ 及退卷积拟合(蓝线)Figure 4. Sample A of fiber coupled SQD, spectra measured at 10 and 77 K under high (red) and low (black) excitation powers. Insets: One-beam spectra after filtering and
${g}^{2}(\tau)$ with deconvoluted fitting (blue).
图 5 光纤粘合SQD样品B (a)光谱(左)和
${g}^{2}(\tau)$ 及退卷积拟合(右), 在10, 40和70 K下变激发功率测试(如蓝、红、黑线, 垂直平移以便显示; 虚线示意腔模; 虚线框示意QD1); (b)三个温度的滤光后光谱(1.1 μW激发功率测试); (c) 10 K温度下QD1的X/X*光谱双线细致结构、强度-激发功率依赖曲线, X显示劈裂, 如光谱峰拟合绿线; (d)退卷积$ {g}^{2}\left(\tau \right) $ 、滤光后APD实测光子计数率随激发功率的变化Figure 5. Sample B of fiber coupled SQD: (a) PL spectra (left) and
${g}^{2}(\tau)$ with deconvoluted fitting (right), measured at 10, 40 and 70 K with variable excitation power (i.e. blue, red and black, offset vertically for clarity; dash line indicates cavity mode, CM, dashed rectangular indicate QD1); (b) spectra after filtering at the three temperatures (measured under excitation power of 1.1 μW); (c) X/X* peak fine structure and intensity excitation power dependence, X shows splitting as the green spectral fittings indicate; (d) deconvoluted${g}^{2}(\tau)$ and photon count rate at APDs after filtering, as a function of the excitation power.表 1 样品光纤输出单光子计数率汇总
Table 1. Summary of fiber output single photon count rate of the samples.
样品及
温度/K光谱峰值强度(面积) 单光子计数率 原光纤输出/s–1 滤光后
分束单路/s–1APD两路
实测/(106 s–1)估算原光纤
输出/(106 s–1)${g}^{2}(0)$ 净单光子
计数率/(106 s–1)A(10) 28747(125205) 1608(9911) 0.04 1.3 0.10 1.2 A(77) 12611(626890) 922(38097) 0.13 4.3 0.05 4.1 B(10) 101360(1124015) 7491(71768) 0.32 9.2 0.70 5.0 B(40) 77800(2591945) 9305(186679) 0.88 22.0 0.70 12.0 B(70) 47840(3945870) 6479(277165) 1.10 29.0 0.70 16.0 B(70a) 15121(5604040) 10045(406237) 1.88 47.0 0.80 21.0 注: 在激发功率2.4 μW下测试, 其他未标注的为在1.1 μW下测试. 
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Wang H, He Y, Li Y H, Su Z E, Li B, Huang H L, Ding X, Chen M C, Liu C, Qin J, Li J P, He Y M, Schneider C, Kamp M, Peng C Z, Hofling S, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2017 Nat. Photonics 11 361
Google Scholar
[2] Pooley M A, Ellis D J P, Patel R B, Bennett A J, Chan K H A, Farrer I, Ritchie D A, Shields A J 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 211103
Google Scholar
[3] Feng L, Zhang M, Xiong X, Chen Y, Wu H, Li M, Guo G P, Guo G C, Dai D X, Ren X F 2019 npj Quant. Inform. 5 2
Google Scholar
[4] Lu L, Xia L, Chen Z, Chen L, Yu T, Tao T, Ma W, Pan Y, Cai X, Lu Y, Zhu S, Ma X 2020 npj Quant. Inform. 6 30
Google Scholar
[5] Paesani S, Borghi M, Signorini S, Maïnos A, Pavesi L, Laing A 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 2505
Google Scholar
[6] Wu R, Lin J, Wang M, Fang Z, Chu W, Zhang J, Zhou J, Cheng Y 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 4698
Google Scholar
[7] Qiang X, Zhou X, Wang J, Wilkes C M, Loke T, Gara S O, Kling L, Marshall G D, Santagati R, Ralph T C, Wang J B, O’Brien J L, Thompson M G, Matthews J C F 2018 Nat. Photonics 12 534
Google Scholar
[8] Najafi F, Mower J, Harris N C, Bellei F, Dane A, Lee C, Hu X, Kharel P, Marsili F, Assefa S, Berggren K K, Englund D 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 5873
Google Scholar
[9] Zhang G, Haw J Y, Cai H, Xu F, Assad S M, Fitzsimons J F, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Yu S, Wu J, Ser W, Kwek L C, Liu A Q 2016 Optica 3 1274
Google Scholar
[10] Chen Z S, Ma B, Shang X J, Ni H Q, Wang J L, Niu Z C 2017 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12 378
Google Scholar
[11] Lee C M, Lim H J, Schneider C, Maier S, Hofling S, Kamp M, Lee Y H 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 14309
Google Scholar
[12] Davanco M I, Rakher M T, Wegscheider W, Schuh D, Badolato A, Srinivasan K 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 121101
Google Scholar
[13] Chonan S, Kato S, Aoki T 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 4785
Google Scholar
[14] Ma B, Chen Z S, Wei S H, Shang X J, Ni H Q, Niu Z C 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 142104
Google Scholar
[15] Muller A, Flagg E B, Metcalfe M, Lawall J, Solomon G S 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 173101
Google Scholar
[16] Gazzano O, Vasconcellos S M, Arnold C, Nowak A, Galopin E, Sagnes I, Lanco L, Lemaitre A, Senellart P 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 1425
Google Scholar
[17] Ding X, He Y M, Duan Z C, Gregersen N, Chen M C, Unsleber S, Maier S, Schneider C, Kamp M, Hofling S, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 020401
Google Scholar
[18] Li S L, Chen Y, Shang X J, Yu Y, Yang J W, Huang J H, Su X B, Shen J X, Sun B Q, Ni H Q, Su X L, Wang K Y, Niu Z C 2020 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 15 145
Google Scholar
[19] Shang X J, Ma B, Ni H Q, Chen Z S, Li S L, Chen Y, He X W, Su X L, Shi Y J, Niu Z C 2020 AIP Adv. 10 085126
Google Scholar
[20] Makhov I S, Panevin V Y, Sofronov A N, Firsov D A, Vorobjev L E, Vinnichenko M Y, Vasil'ev A P, Maleev N A 2017 Superlattices and Microstruct. 112 79
Google Scholar
[21] Typical Properties of Norland Optical Adhesive (NOA) 61, Norland Products Inc. www.norlandprod.com/adhesives/NOA%2061.html [2020-12-10]
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5026
- PDF Downloads: 114
- Cited By: 0
