Mixed mismatch model predicted interfacial thermal conductance of metal/semiconductor interface

Zong Zhi-Cheng; Pan Dong-Kai; Deng Shi-Chen; Wan Xiao; Yang Li-Na; Ma Deng-Ke; Yang Nuo

doi:10.7498/aps.72.20221981

Abstract

The acoustic mismatch model and diffuse mismatch model are widely used to calculate interfacial thermal conductance. These two models are respectively based on the assumption of extremely smooth and rough interfaces. Owing to the great difference between the actual interface structure and the two hypotheses, the predictions of these two models deviate greatly from the actual interfacial thermal conductance. The recently proposed mixed mismatch model considers the effect of interface structure on the ratio of phonon specular transmission to diffuse scattering transmission, and the prediction accuracy is improved. However, this model requires molecular dynamics simulation to obtain phonon information at the interface. In this work, the mixed mismatch model is simplified by introducing the measured roughness value, and the influence of interface structure on the contact area is taken into account to achieve a simple, fast and accurate prediction of interface thermal conductance. Based on this model, the interfacial thermal conductances of metals (aluminum, copper, gold) and semiconductors (silicon, silicon carbide, gallium arsenide, gallium nitride) are calculated and predicted. The results of Al/Si interface are in good agreement with the experimental results. This model is helpful not only in understanding the mechanism of interface heat conduction, but also in comparing with the measurement results.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
2.
School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
3.
School of Physics and Technology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210000, China

Corresponding author: Yang Nuo, nuo@hust.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (Grant No. 2018YFE0127800).

[1]	Wei N, Zhou C, Li Z, Ou B, Zhao K, Yu P, Li S, Zhao J 2022 Mater. Today Commun. 30 103147 Google Scholar
[2]	Cui Y, Li M, Hu Y 2020 J. Mater. Chem. C 8 10568 Google Scholar
[3]	Deng S, Xiao C, Yuan J, Ma D, Li J, Yang N, He H 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 101603 Google Scholar
[4]	Cahill D G, Braun P V, Chen G, Clarke D R, Fan S, Goodson K E, Keblinski P, King W P, Mahan G D, Majumdar A, Maris H J, Phillpot S R, Pop E, Shi L 2014 Appl. Phys. Rev. 1 011305 Google Scholar
[5]	Peng X, Jiang P, Ouyang Y, Lu S, Ren W, Chen J 2021 Nanotechnology 33 035707 Google Scholar
[6]	Monachon C, Weber L, Dames C 2016 Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 46 433 Google Scholar
[7]	Scott E A, Gaskins J T, King S W, Hopkins P E 2018 APL Mater. 6 058302 Google Scholar
[8]	Yang L, Wan X, Ma D, Jiang Y, Yang N 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 155305 Google Scholar
[9]	Liu B, Khvesyuk V I, Barinov A A, Wang M 2022 Int. J. Mech. Sci. 218 106993 Google Scholar
[10]	Yang N, Luo T, Esfarjani K, Henry A, Tian Z, Shiomi J, Chalopin Y, Li B, Chen G 2015 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 12 168 Google Scholar
[11]	Rustam S, Schram M, Lu Z, Chaka A M, Rosenthal W S, Pfaendtner J 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 32590 Google Scholar
[12]	Zhang P, Yuan P, Jiang X, Zhai S, Zeng J, Xian Y, Qin H, Yang D 2018 Small 14 1702769 Google Scholar
[13]	Giri A, Hopkins P E 2020 Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 1903857 Google Scholar
[14]	Ren W, Ouyang Y, Jiang P, Yu C, He J, Chen J 2021 Nano Lett. 21 2634 Google Scholar
[15]	Duda J C, Hopkins P E 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 111602 Google Scholar
[16]	Hopkins P E, Duda J C, Petz C W, Floro J A 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 035438 Google Scholar
[17]	Hopkins P E, Duda J C, Clark S P, Hains C P, Rotter T J, Phinney L M, Balakrishnan G 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 161913 Google Scholar
[18]	Hopkins P E, Phinney L M, Serrano J R, Beechem T E 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 085307 Google Scholar
[19]	Lee E, Zhang T, Yoo T, Guo Z, Luo T 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 35505 Google Scholar
[20]	Park W, Sood A, Park J, Asheghi M, Sinclair R, Goodson K E 2017 Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 21 134 Google Scholar
[21]	Liang Y, Zhang B, Liu Z, Liu W 2021 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 174 121306 Google Scholar
[22]	Xu Y, Kato R, Goto M 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 104317 Google Scholar
[23]	Nylander A, Hansson J, Nilsson T, Ye L, Fu Y, Liu J 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 30992 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhang Y, Ma D, Zang Y, Wang X, Yang N 2018 Front. Energy Res. 6 00048 Google Scholar
[25]	Singh P, Seong M, Sinha S 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 181906 Google Scholar
[26]	Hamaoui G, Horny N, Hua Z, Zhu T, Robillard J F, Fleming A, Ban H, Chirtoc M 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 11352 Google Scholar
[27]	Giri A, Gaskins J T, Donovan B F, Szwejkowski C, Warzoha R J, Rodriguez M A, Ihlefeld J, Hopkins P E 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 105105 Google Scholar
[28]	Chen J, Xu X, Zhou J, Li B 2022 Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 025002 Google Scholar
[29]	Swartz E T, Pohl R O 1989 Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 605 Google Scholar
[30]	Kazan M, Bruyant A, Royer P, Masri P 2010 Surf. Sci. Rep. 65 111 Google Scholar
[31]	De Bellis L, Phelan P E, Prasher R S 2000 J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 14 144 Google Scholar
[32]	Ziman J M 1960 Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
[33]	Gale J D, Rohl A L 2003 Mol. Simul. 29 291 Google Scholar
[34]	Mei J, Davenport J W 1992 Phys. Rev. B 46 21 Google Scholar
[35]	Foiles S M, Baskes M I, Daw M S 1986 Phys. Rev. B 33 7983 Google Scholar
[36]	Johnson R A 1989 Phys. Rev. B 39 12554 Google Scholar
[37]	Stillinger F H, Weber T A 1985 Phys. Rev. B 31 5262 Google Scholar
[38]	Tersoff J 1988 Phys. Rev. B 38 9902 Google Scholar
[39]	Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169 Google Scholar
[40]	Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1 Google Scholar
[41]	Mulakaluri N, Persson B N J 2011 EPL 96 66003 Google Scholar
[42]	Farber D L, Krisch M, Antonangeli D, Beraud A, Badro J, Occelli F, Orlikowski D 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 115502 Google Scholar
[43]	Trampenau J, Petry W, Herzig C 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 3132 Google Scholar
[44]	Dal Corso A 2013 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25 145401 Google Scholar
[45]	Koh Y R, Shi J, Wang B, Hu R, Ahmad H, Kerdsongpanya S, Milosevic E, Doolittle W A, Gall D, Tian Z, Graham S, Hopkins P E 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 205304 Google Scholar
[46]	Debernardi A, Alouani M, Dreyssé H 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 064305 Google Scholar
[47]	Serrano J, Manjón F J, Romero A H, Ivanov A, Cardona M, Lauck R, Bosak A, Krisch M 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 174304 Google Scholar
[48]	Ghosh K, Singisetti U 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 072102 Google Scholar
[49]	Fritsch J, Pavone P, Schroder U 1995 Phys. Rev. B 52 11326 Google Scholar
[50]	Qi R, Shi R, Li Y, Sun Y, Wu M, Li N, Du J, Liu K, Chen C, Chen J, Wang F, Yu D, Wang E G, Gao P 2021 Nature 599 399 Google Scholar
[51]	Cheng Z, Li R, Yan X, Jernigan G, Shi J, Liao M E, Hines N J, Gadre C A, Idrobo J C, Lee E, Hobart K D, Goorsky M S, Pan X, Luo T, Graham S 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 6901 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 金属的声子色散关系和DOS　(a) Al; (b) Cu; (c) Au

Figure 1. Phonon dispersion relations and DOS of metals: (a) Al; (b) Cu; (c) Au.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 半导体的声子色散关系和DOS　(a) Si; (b) SiC; (c) GaAs; (d) GaN

Figure 2. Phonon dispersion relations and DOS of semiconductors: (a) Si; (b) SiC; (c) GaAs; (d) GaN.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 AMM, DMM和MMM (粗糙度: 0.28, 1.38, 2.16 nm)三种模型计算界面声子透射率频谱对比　(a) Al/Si界面; (b) Al/SiC界面; (c) Al/GaAs界面; (d) Al/GaN界面

Figure 3. Comparison of phonon transmittance spectra calculated by AMM, DMM and MMM (roughness: 0.28, 1.38, 2.16 nm): (a) Al/Si interface; (b) Al/SiC interface; (c) Al/GaAs interface; (d) Al/GaN interface.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 界面接触系数S和粗糙度之间的关系, 其中η_max为界面两侧材料的原子间经验势函数截止半径, 当界面粗糙度大于这个值时, 认为界面接触系数趋近于0, 对于Al/Si界面, 该值为4.7 nm

Figure 4. Relationship between interface contact coefficient S and roughness, where η_max is the cutoff radius of the interatomic empirical potential function of the materials on both sides of the interface. When the roughness of the interface is greater than this value, the interface contact coefficient is considered to approach 0, which is 4.7 nm for Al/Si interface.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 AMM, DMM和MMM (粗糙度: 0.28, 1.38, 2.16 nm)预测界面热导随温度的变化　(a) Al/Si界面; (b) Al/SiC界面; (c) Al/GaAs界面; (d) Al/GaN界面; 实验值来源于Hopkins等^[16]的测量

Figure 5. Curves of interfacial thermal conductance predicted by AMM, DMM and MMM (roughness: 0.28, 0.53, 1.38 nm) models as a function of temperature: (a) Al/Si interface; (b) Al/SiC interface; (c) Al/GaAs interface; (d) Al/GaN interface. The experimental values were obtained from measurements made by Hopkins et al.^[16]

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 MMM模型预测300 K时的金属(Al, Cu, Au)和半导体(Si, SiC, GaAs, GaN)界面热导, 其中粗糙度取值为0.28, 1.38, 2.16 nm

Figure 6. Interfacial thermal conductance of metal (Al, Cu, Au) and semiconductor (Si, SiC, GaAs, GaN) interfaces predicted by MMM model at 300 K, roughness values: 0.28 nm, 1.38 nm, 2.16 nm.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Wei N, Zhou C, Li Z, Ou B, Zhao K, Yu P, Li S, Zhao J 2022 Mater. Today Commun. 30 103147 Google Scholar
[2]	Cui Y, Li M, Hu Y 2020 J. Mater. Chem. C 8 10568 Google Scholar
[3]	Deng S, Xiao C, Yuan J, Ma D, Li J, Yang N, He H 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 101603 Google Scholar
[4]	Cahill D G, Braun P V, Chen G, Clarke D R, Fan S, Goodson K E, Keblinski P, King W P, Mahan G D, Majumdar A, Maris H J, Phillpot S R, Pop E, Shi L 2014 Appl. Phys. Rev. 1 011305 Google Scholar
[5]	Peng X, Jiang P, Ouyang Y, Lu S, Ren W, Chen J 2021 Nanotechnology 33 035707 Google Scholar
[6]	Monachon C, Weber L, Dames C 2016 Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 46 433 Google Scholar
[7]	Scott E A, Gaskins J T, King S W, Hopkins P E 2018 APL Mater. 6 058302 Google Scholar
[8]	Yang L, Wan X, Ma D, Jiang Y, Yang N 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 155305 Google Scholar
[9]	Liu B, Khvesyuk V I, Barinov A A, Wang M 2022 Int. J. Mech. Sci. 218 106993 Google Scholar
[10]	Yang N, Luo T, Esfarjani K, Henry A, Tian Z, Shiomi J, Chalopin Y, Li B, Chen G 2015 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 12 168 Google Scholar
[11]	Rustam S, Schram M, Lu Z, Chaka A M, Rosenthal W S, Pfaendtner J 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 32590 Google Scholar
[12]	Zhang P, Yuan P, Jiang X, Zhai S, Zeng J, Xian Y, Qin H, Yang D 2018 Small 14 1702769 Google Scholar
[13]	Giri A, Hopkins P E 2020 Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 1903857 Google Scholar
[14]	Ren W, Ouyang Y, Jiang P, Yu C, He J, Chen J 2021 Nano Lett. 21 2634 Google Scholar
[15]	Duda J C, Hopkins P E 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 111602 Google Scholar
[16]	Hopkins P E, Duda J C, Petz C W, Floro J A 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 035438 Google Scholar
[17]	Hopkins P E, Duda J C, Clark S P, Hains C P, Rotter T J, Phinney L M, Balakrishnan G 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 161913 Google Scholar
[18]	Hopkins P E, Phinney L M, Serrano J R, Beechem T E 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 085307 Google Scholar
[19]	Lee E, Zhang T, Yoo T, Guo Z, Luo T 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 35505 Google Scholar
[20]	Park W, Sood A, Park J, Asheghi M, Sinclair R, Goodson K E 2017 Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 21 134 Google Scholar
[21]	Liang Y, Zhang B, Liu Z, Liu W 2021 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 174 121306 Google Scholar
[22]	Xu Y, Kato R, Goto M 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 104317 Google Scholar
[23]	Nylander A, Hansson J, Nilsson T, Ye L, Fu Y, Liu J 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 30992 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhang Y, Ma D, Zang Y, Wang X, Yang N 2018 Front. Energy Res. 6 00048 Google Scholar
[25]	Singh P, Seong M, Sinha S 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 181906 Google Scholar
[26]	Hamaoui G, Horny N, Hua Z, Zhu T, Robillard J F, Fleming A, Ban H, Chirtoc M 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 11352 Google Scholar
[27]	Giri A, Gaskins J T, Donovan B F, Szwejkowski C, Warzoha R J, Rodriguez M A, Ihlefeld J, Hopkins P E 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 105105 Google Scholar
[28]	Chen J, Xu X, Zhou J, Li B 2022 Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 025002 Google Scholar
[29]	Swartz E T, Pohl R O 1989 Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 605 Google Scholar
[30]	Kazan M, Bruyant A, Royer P, Masri P 2010 Surf. Sci. Rep. 65 111 Google Scholar
[31]	De Bellis L, Phelan P E, Prasher R S 2000 J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 14 144 Google Scholar
[32]	Ziman J M 1960 Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
[33]	Gale J D, Rohl A L 2003 Mol. Simul. 29 291 Google Scholar
[34]	Mei J, Davenport J W 1992 Phys. Rev. B 46 21 Google Scholar
[35]	Foiles S M, Baskes M I, Daw M S 1986 Phys. Rev. B 33 7983 Google Scholar
[36]	Johnson R A 1989 Phys. Rev. B 39 12554 Google Scholar
[37]	Stillinger F H, Weber T A 1985 Phys. Rev. B 31 5262 Google Scholar
[38]	Tersoff J 1988 Phys. Rev. B 38 9902 Google Scholar
[39]	Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169 Google Scholar
[40]	Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1 Google Scholar
[41]	Mulakaluri N, Persson B N J 2011 EPL 96 66003 Google Scholar
[42]	Farber D L, Krisch M, Antonangeli D, Beraud A, Badro J, Occelli F, Orlikowski D 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 115502 Google Scholar
[43]	Trampenau J, Petry W, Herzig C 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 3132 Google Scholar
[44]	Dal Corso A 2013 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25 145401 Google Scholar
[45]	Koh Y R, Shi J, Wang B, Hu R, Ahmad H, Kerdsongpanya S, Milosevic E, Doolittle W A, Gall D, Tian Z, Graham S, Hopkins P E 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 205304 Google Scholar
[46]	Debernardi A, Alouani M, Dreyssé H 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 064305 Google Scholar
[47]	Serrano J, Manjón F J, Romero A H, Ivanov A, Cardona M, Lauck R, Bosak A, Krisch M 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 174304 Google Scholar
[48]	Ghosh K, Singisetti U 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 072102 Google Scholar
[49]	Fritsch J, Pavone P, Schroder U 1995 Phys. Rev. B 52 11326 Google Scholar
[50]	Qi R, Shi R, Li Y, Sun Y, Wu M, Li N, Du J, Liu K, Chen C, Chen J, Wang F, Yu D, Wang E G, Gao P 2021 Nature 599 399 Google Scholar
[51]	Cheng Z, Li R, Yan X, Jernigan G, Shi J, Liao M E, Hines N J, Gadre C A, Idrobo J C, Lee E, Hobart K D, Goorsky M S, Pan X, Luo T, Graham S 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 6901 Google Scholar

[1]	Sang Li-Xia, Li Zhi-Kang. Molecular dynamics simulation of thermal transport properties of phonons at interface of Au-TiO₂ photoelectrode. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(10): 103105. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240026
[2]	Liu Dong-Jing, Zhou Fu, Hu Zhi-Liang, Huang Jia-Qiang. Molecular dynamics study of interfacial thermal transport properties of graphene/GaN heterostructure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(13): 137901. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240021
[3]	Liu Zi-Yi, Chu Fu-Qiang, Wei Jun-Jun, Feng Yan-Hui. Interface thermal conductance and phonon thermal transport characteristics of diamond/carbon nanotube interface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(13): 138102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240323
[4]	Liu Dong-Jing, Hu Zhi-Liang, Zhou Fu, Wang Peng-Bo, Wang Zhen-Dong, Li Tao. Interfacial thermal conductance of gallium nitride/graphene/diamond heterostructure based on molecular dynamics simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(15): 150202. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240515
[5]	Zhao Jian-Ning, Wei Dong, Lü Guo-Zheng, Wang Zi-Cheng, Liu Dong-Huan. Transient thermal rectification effect of one-dimensional heterostructure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(4): 044401. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222085
[6]	Qiu Yu-Jun, Li Heng-Xuan, Li Ya-Tao, Huang Chun-Pu, Li Wei-Hua, Zhang Xu-Tao, Liu Ying-Guang. Nanodot embedding based optimization of interfacial thermal conductance. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(11): 113102. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230314
[7]	Wang Quan-Jie, Deng Yu-Ge, Wang Ren-Zong, Liu Xiang-Jun. Interface engineering moderated interfacial thermal conductance of GaN-based heterointerfaces. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(22): 226301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230791
[8]	Fu Bai-Shan, Liao Yi, Zhou Jun. Dilution refrigerator and its heat transfer problems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(23): 230202. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211760
[9]	Liu Dong-Jing, Wang Shao-Ming, Yang Ping. Thermal property of graphene/silicon carbide heterostructure by molecular dynamics simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(18): 187302. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210613
[10]	Zhao Jian-Ning, Liu Dong-Huan, Wei Dong, Shang Xin-Chun. Thermal rectification mechanism of one-dimensional composite structure with interface thermal contact resistance. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(5): 056501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191409
[11]	Wu Xiang-Shui, Tang Wen-Ting, Xu Xiang-Fan. Recent progresses of thermal conduction in two-dimensional materials. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(19): 196602. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200709
[12]	Mei Tao, Chen Zhan-Xiu, Yang Li, Zhu Hong-Man, Miao Rui-Can. Molecular dynamics study of interface thermal resistance in asymmetric nanochannel. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(22): 224701. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200491
[13]	Zhang Long-Yan, Xu Jin-Liang, Lei Jun-Peng. Size effect on boundary condition at solid-liquid interface in microchannel. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(2): 020201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181876
[14]	Li Man, Dai Zhi-Gao, Ying Jian-Jian, Xiao Xiang-Heng, Yue Ya-Nan. Thermal characterization of carbon nanotube fibers based on steady-state electro-Raman-thermal technique. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(12): 126501. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.126501
[15]	Ju Sheng-Hong, Liang Xin-Gang. Thermal rectification and phonon scattering in silicon nanofilm with triangle hole. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(2): 026101. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.026101
[16]	Ge Song, Chen Min. A molecular dynamics simulation on the relationship between contact angle and solid-liquid interfacial thermal resistance. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(11): 110204. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.110204
[17]	Ma Wei-Gang, Wang Hai-Dong, Zhang Xing, Wang Wei. Theoretical and experimental study of femtosecond pulse laser heating on thin metal film. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(6): 064401. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.064401
[18]	Li Xun-Shuan, Peng Ying-Quan, Yang Qing-Sen, Xing Hong-Wei, Lu Fei-Ping. Analytical model of charge transport at organic semiconductor interfaces. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(9): 5441-5445. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.5441
[19]	Li Shu-Ping, Wang Ren-Zhi. Formation mechanism of interface charges in the metal-semiconductor superlattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(9): 2925-2930. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.2925
[20]	PANG GEN-DI, XIONG SHI-JIE, CAI JIAN-HUA. ON THE INTERFACE MISFIT AND THE SUPERLATTICE STRUCTURES. Acta Physica Sinica, 1986, 35(3): 408-412. doi: 10.7498/aps.35.408

2023年第3期034401补充材料.pdf

Catalog

Vol. 72, Issue 3 - 2023-02-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 5995
PDF Downloads: 269
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板