-
Considering the interactions between bubbles in a multi-bubble system in a liquid micro-cavity, a spherical bubble cluster in a liquid cavity is modeled in order to describe the dynamical effect of the viscoelastic medium outside the liquid cavity on the oscillation of bubbles, and the coupled equations of bubbles are obtained. Subsequently, the acoustic response characteristics of bubbles are investigated by analyzing the radial oscillation, the stability of the non-spherical shape of bubbles and the threshold of inertial cavitation. The results show that the confinement of the cavity and the bubble cluster facilitates the suppression of bubble oscillation, however, it might enhance the nonlinear properties of bubbles to a certain extent. From the acoustic response curve at 1 MHz, it is found that the main resonance peaks shift leftward with the increase of the bubble number, which means a minor resonant radius can be obtained. The nonlinear stability of bubbles in a confined environment is mainly determined by acoustic pressure amplitude and frequency, the initial bubble radius, and bubble number density, while the effect of the cavity radius is enhanced with the increase of the driving pressure. There is a minimum unstable driving acoustic pressure threshold, depending on the initial bubble radius, and the unstable regions are mainly located in a range of less than 4 μm. With the increase in bubble number density, the strip-type stable region scattered of the unstable region in the map is gradually transformed into a random patch-like distribution, which indicates that the bubble oscillation under high acoustic pressure is more sensitive to the parameters, and it is very susceptible to interference, produces unstable oscillation and then collapses. When the bubble equilibrium radius is in a range greater than 4 μm, the influences of frequency and bubble number density on the inertial thresholds are particularly significant.
-
Keywords:
- spherical bubble cluster /
- liquid cavity /
- cavitation bubbles /
- coupled oscillation
[1] Kooiman K, Roovers S, Langeveld S A G, Kleven R T, Dewitte H, O'Reilly M A, Escoffre J M, Bouakaz A, Verweij M D, Hynynen K, Lentacker I, Stride E, Holland C K 2020 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 46 1296Google Scholar
[2] Xi F, Feng Y, Chen Q, Chen L, Liu J 2022 Front. Oncol. 12 852454Google Scholar
[3] Ellegala D B, Leong-Poi H, Carpenter J E, Klibanov A L, Kaul S, Shaffrey M E, Sklenar J, Lindner J R 2003 Circulation 108 336Google Scholar
[4] Lanza G M, Abendschein D R, Hall C S, Scott M J, Scherrer D E, Houseman A, Miller J G, Wickline S A 2000 J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 13 608Google Scholar
[5] Lyons B, Balkaran J P R, Dunn-Lawless D, Lucian V, Keller S B, O'Reilly C S, Hu L A, Rubasingham J, Nair M, Carlisle R, Stride E, Gray M, Coussios C, Lu Y, Chen Z J 2023 Molecules 28 7733Google Scholar
[6] Wischhusen J, Padilla F 2019 Irbm 40 10Google Scholar
[7] Guzman H R, McNamara A J, Nguyen D X, Prausnitz M R 2003 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29 1211Google Scholar
[8] Liu Y, Yang H, Sakanishi A 2006 Biotechnol. Adv. 24 1Google Scholar
[9] Unnikrishnan S, Klibanov A L 2012 Am. J. Roentgenol. 199 292Google Scholar
[10] Villanueva F S, Jankowski R J, Klibanov S, Pina M L, Alber S M, Watkins S C, Brandenburger G H, Wagner W R 1998 Circulation 98 1Google Scholar
[11] Schenk H J, Steppe K, Jansen S 2015 Trends Plant Sci. 20 199Google Scholar
[12] Tanasawa I, Yang W J 1970 J. Appl. Phys. 41 4526Google Scholar
[13] Wang Q X 2017 Phys. Fluids 29 072101Google Scholar
[14] Vincent O, Marmottant P, Gonzalez-Avila S R, Ando K, Ohl C D 2014 Soft Matter 10 1455Google Scholar
[15] Church C C, Yang X M 2006 AIP Conf. Proc. 838 217Google Scholar
[16] Leonov K, Akhatov I 2021 Phys. Rev. E 104 015105Google Scholar
[17] 张陶然, 莫润阳, 胡静, 陈时, 王成会, 郭建中 2021 物理学报 70 124301Google Scholar
Zhang T R, Mo R Y, Hu J, Chen S, Wang C H, Guo J Z 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 124301Google Scholar
[18] 张先梅, 王成会, 郭建中, 莫润阳, 胡静, 陈时 2021 物理学报 70 214305Google Scholar
Zhang X M, Wang C H, Guo J Z, Mo R Y, Hu J, Chen S 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 214305Google Scholar
[19] Zhang X M, Li F, Wang C H, Guo J Z, Mo R Y, Hu J, Chen S, He J X, Liu H H 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem. 84 105957Google Scholar
[20] Gaudron R, Murakami K, Johnsen E 2020 J. Mech. Phys. Solids 143 104047Google Scholar
[21] Zilonova E M, Solovchuk M, Sheu T W H 2019 Ultrason. Sonochem. 53 11Google Scholar
[22] Yasui K, Iida Y, Tuziuti T, Kozuka T, Towata A 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 016609Google Scholar
[23] Wang X, Chen W, Zhou M, Zhang Z, Zhang L 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem. 84 105952Google Scholar
[24] An Y 2011 Phys. Rev. E 83 066313Google Scholar
[25] Zhang W, An Y 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 053023Google Scholar
[26] 王成会, 莫润阳, 胡静, 陈时 2015 物理学报 64 234301Google Scholar
Wang C H, Mo R Y, Hu J, Chen S 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 234301Google Scholar
[27] Xu L, Yao X R, Shen Y 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 044702Google Scholar
[28] Liu R, Huang C Y, Wu Y R, Hu J, Mo R Y, Wang C H 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 084303 [刘睿, 黄晨阳, 武耀蓉, 胡静, 莫润阳, 王成会 2024 物理学报 73 084303]Google Scholar
Liu R, Huang C Y, Wu Y R, Hu J, Mo R Y, Wang C H 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 084303Google Scholar
[29] 李凡, 张先梅, 田华, 胡静, 陈时, 王成会, 郭建中, 莫润阳 2022 物理学报 71 084303Google Scholar
Li F, Zhang X M, Tian H, Hu J, Chen S, Wang C H, Guo J Z, Mo R Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 084303Google Scholar
[30] Vincent O, Marmottant P, Quinto-Su P A, Ohl C D 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 184502Google Scholar
[31] Ma Y, Zhang G, Ma T 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem. 84 105953Google Scholar
[32] Weninger K R, Camara C G, Putterman S J 2001 Phys. Rev. E 63 016310Google Scholar
-
图 2 不同模型下气泡振荡对比图 (a)本文模型(model 1)与球状泡群内气泡的耦合振动模型(model 2)以及单泡模型(single bubble)对比; (b)本文模型与弹性介质包裹的液体腔内单气泡空化模型(model 3)对比
Figure 2. Comparison of different models of bubble oscillations: (a) The model in this paper (model 1) is compared with the coupled oscillation model of bubble cluster in the infinite liquid (model 2) and the single bubble model (single bubble); (b) the model in this paper (model 1) is compared with the model of a single bubble in a liquid cavity enclosed by elastic medium (model 3).
图 3 气泡振动特性 (a) 气泡振动分岔图; (b) 不同介质剪切模量下气泡径向振荡; (c) 气泡数量对气泡最大半径的影响; (d) 初始气泡半径对气泡最大半径的影响
Figure 3. Bubble oscillations characteristics: (a) Bubble oscillations bifurcation diagram; (b) radial oscillations of bubble under different medium shear moduli; (c) effect of the number of bubbles on maximum bubble radius; (d) effect of initial bubble radius on maximum bubble radius.
图 4 不同参数平面上气泡非球形系数与气泡半径比值$ {a_n}/{r_{{\text{b}}0}} $ (a) $ {r_{{\text{b0}}}}{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $参数平面; (b) $ N{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $参数平面; (c) $ {R_{{\text{c}}0}}{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $参数平面; (d) $ f{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $参数平面; (e) $ {r_{{\text{c0}}}}{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $参数平面; (f) $ G{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $参数平面(黑色, 稳定; 白色, 不稳定)
Figure 4. Ratio of bubble nonsphericity coefficient to bubble radius in different parameter planes: (a) $ {r_{{\text{b0}}}}{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $ parameter plane; (b) $ N{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $ parameter plane; (c) $ {R_{{\text{c0}}}}{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $ parameter plane; (d) $ f{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $ parameter plane; (e) $ {r_{{\text{c0}}}}{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $ parameter plane; (f) $ G{\text{-}}{p_{\text{a}}} $ parameter plane (black, stable; white, unstable).
-
[1] Kooiman K, Roovers S, Langeveld S A G, Kleven R T, Dewitte H, O'Reilly M A, Escoffre J M, Bouakaz A, Verweij M D, Hynynen K, Lentacker I, Stride E, Holland C K 2020 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 46 1296Google Scholar
[2] Xi F, Feng Y, Chen Q, Chen L, Liu J 2022 Front. Oncol. 12 852454Google Scholar
[3] Ellegala D B, Leong-Poi H, Carpenter J E, Klibanov A L, Kaul S, Shaffrey M E, Sklenar J, Lindner J R 2003 Circulation 108 336Google Scholar
[4] Lanza G M, Abendschein D R, Hall C S, Scott M J, Scherrer D E, Houseman A, Miller J G, Wickline S A 2000 J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 13 608Google Scholar
[5] Lyons B, Balkaran J P R, Dunn-Lawless D, Lucian V, Keller S B, O'Reilly C S, Hu L A, Rubasingham J, Nair M, Carlisle R, Stride E, Gray M, Coussios C, Lu Y, Chen Z J 2023 Molecules 28 7733Google Scholar
[6] Wischhusen J, Padilla F 2019 Irbm 40 10Google Scholar
[7] Guzman H R, McNamara A J, Nguyen D X, Prausnitz M R 2003 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29 1211Google Scholar
[8] Liu Y, Yang H, Sakanishi A 2006 Biotechnol. Adv. 24 1Google Scholar
[9] Unnikrishnan S, Klibanov A L 2012 Am. J. Roentgenol. 199 292Google Scholar
[10] Villanueva F S, Jankowski R J, Klibanov S, Pina M L, Alber S M, Watkins S C, Brandenburger G H, Wagner W R 1998 Circulation 98 1Google Scholar
[11] Schenk H J, Steppe K, Jansen S 2015 Trends Plant Sci. 20 199Google Scholar
[12] Tanasawa I, Yang W J 1970 J. Appl. Phys. 41 4526Google Scholar
[13] Wang Q X 2017 Phys. Fluids 29 072101Google Scholar
[14] Vincent O, Marmottant P, Gonzalez-Avila S R, Ando K, Ohl C D 2014 Soft Matter 10 1455Google Scholar
[15] Church C C, Yang X M 2006 AIP Conf. Proc. 838 217Google Scholar
[16] Leonov K, Akhatov I 2021 Phys. Rev. E 104 015105Google Scholar
[17] 张陶然, 莫润阳, 胡静, 陈时, 王成会, 郭建中 2021 物理学报 70 124301Google Scholar
Zhang T R, Mo R Y, Hu J, Chen S, Wang C H, Guo J Z 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 124301Google Scholar
[18] 张先梅, 王成会, 郭建中, 莫润阳, 胡静, 陈时 2021 物理学报 70 214305Google Scholar
Zhang X M, Wang C H, Guo J Z, Mo R Y, Hu J, Chen S 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 214305Google Scholar
[19] Zhang X M, Li F, Wang C H, Guo J Z, Mo R Y, Hu J, Chen S, He J X, Liu H H 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem. 84 105957Google Scholar
[20] Gaudron R, Murakami K, Johnsen E 2020 J. Mech. Phys. Solids 143 104047Google Scholar
[21] Zilonova E M, Solovchuk M, Sheu T W H 2019 Ultrason. Sonochem. 53 11Google Scholar
[22] Yasui K, Iida Y, Tuziuti T, Kozuka T, Towata A 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 016609Google Scholar
[23] Wang X, Chen W, Zhou M, Zhang Z, Zhang L 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem. 84 105952Google Scholar
[24] An Y 2011 Phys. Rev. E 83 066313Google Scholar
[25] Zhang W, An Y 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 053023Google Scholar
[26] 王成会, 莫润阳, 胡静, 陈时 2015 物理学报 64 234301Google Scholar
Wang C H, Mo R Y, Hu J, Chen S 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 234301Google Scholar
[27] Xu L, Yao X R, Shen Y 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 044702Google Scholar
[28] Liu R, Huang C Y, Wu Y R, Hu J, Mo R Y, Wang C H 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 084303 [刘睿, 黄晨阳, 武耀蓉, 胡静, 莫润阳, 王成会 2024 物理学报 73 084303]Google Scholar
Liu R, Huang C Y, Wu Y R, Hu J, Mo R Y, Wang C H 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 084303Google Scholar
[29] 李凡, 张先梅, 田华, 胡静, 陈时, 王成会, 郭建中, 莫润阳 2022 物理学报 71 084303Google Scholar
Li F, Zhang X M, Tian H, Hu J, Chen S, Wang C H, Guo J Z, Mo R Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 084303Google Scholar
[30] Vincent O, Marmottant P, Quinto-Su P A, Ohl C D 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 184502Google Scholar
[31] Ma Y, Zhang G, Ma T 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem. 84 105953Google Scholar
[32] Weninger K R, Camara C G, Putterman S J 2001 Phys. Rev. E 63 016310Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 1201
- PDF Downloads: 35
- Cited By: 0