-
The bimetallic nanoparticle can effectively integrate the physical and chemical properties of two metals and simultaneously exhibits the unique natures of each metal. It also serves as a good candidate for improving light scattering, photothermal conversion, plasmon resonance decay, and photon excitation. Investigating the optical properties of an individual nanoparticle can avoid the interaction between nanoparticles during experimental research, which allows us to more effectively analyze the interaction between the incident light and nanoparticles. In this work, the finite-difference time-domain method is used to study the spectral absorption characteristics of the plasmon bimetallic core-shell nanoparticles by calculating the spectroscopic properties, and also the distributions of the magnetic field, electric field, and absorption power during energy transmission and decaying. The results show that the resonance wavelength is red-shifted if the core diameter is increased. In addition, the absorption rate of Ag@Pt bimetallic nanoparticles is higher than that of pure Ag@Ag nanoparticles when the core diameter is bigger than 100 nm. This is because the strong shielding effect between the shell metal material and the core metal material leads the incident light to interact only with the outer atoms, resulting in resonance. Meanwhile, the plasmon of the Ag core decays faster than that of the Pt shell and more energies are transferred to the Pt shell. As a result, the surface of the Pt shell shows more concentrated magnetic and electric fields associated with an enlarged absorbing power. Moreover, the energy in the Ag core tends to transfer to the nearby Pt shell, which is characterized by the energy absorption in the Pt shell close to the Ag core, and is more concentrated. This paper provides theoretical guidance for designing plasmon bimetallic core-shell nanoparticles, thereby satisfying the demands for special spectral responses.
-
Keywords:
- solar energy conversion /
- core-shell structure /
- bimetallic nanoparticles /
- spectral absorption inversion
[1] Cao C, Zhao Z Y, Zhang Y M, Peng S 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 265103
Google Scholar
[2] 刘海舟, 喻小强, 李金磊, 徐凝, 周林, 朱嘉 2019 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 49 17
Google Scholar
Liu H Z, Yu X Q, Li J L, Xu N, Zhou L, Zhu J 2019 Sci China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 49 17
Google Scholar
[3] Kunwar S, Pandit S, Jeong J H, Lee J 2020 Nano-Micro Lett. 12 91
[4] 任益弘, 朱君, 李娜, 王各, 娄健 2020 激光杂志 41 1
Google Scholar
Ren Y H, Zhu J, Li N, Wang G, Lou J 2020 Laser J. 41 1
Google Scholar
[5] Wang T M, Tang G H, Du M 2020 Appl. Therm. Eng. 173 115182
Google Scholar
[6] 殷澄, 陆成杰, 笪婧, 张瑞耕, 阚雪芬, 韩庆邦, 许田 2021 物理学报 70 024201
Google Scholar
Yin C, Lu C J, Da J, Zhang R G, Kan X F, Han Q B, Xu T 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 024201
Google Scholar
[7] 彭浩程, 葛成, 周婧, 陈鹏, 施毅, 张荣, 郑有炓 2020 光电子技术 40 176
Google Scholar
Peng H C, Ge C, Zhou J, Chen P, Shi Y, Zhang R, Zheng Y L 2020 Optoe. Technol. 40 176
Google Scholar
[8] Chen M J, He Y R, Wang X Z, Hu Y W 2018 Appl. Energy 211 735
Google Scholar
[9] Tunkara E, DeJarnette D, Saunders A E, Baldwin M, Otanicar T, Roberts K P 2019 Appl. Energy 252 113459
Google Scholar
[10] Yu X X, Xuan Y M 2018 Sol. Energy 160 200
Google Scholar
[11] 刘兵, 宫辉力, 刘锐, 胡长文 2019 应用化学 36 939
Google Scholar
Liu B, Gong H L, Liu R, Hu C W 2019 Chin. J. Appl. Chem. 36 939
Google Scholar
[12] 朱群志, 蒋瑜毅 2017 光散射学报 29 222
Google Scholar
Zhu Q Z, Jiang Y Y 2017 Chin. J. Light Scatt. 29 222
Google Scholar
[13] Manjavacas A, Liu J G, Kulkarni V, Nordlander P 2014 ACS Nano 8 7630
Google Scholar
[14] Linic S, Aslam U, Boerigter C, Morabito M 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 567
Google Scholar
[15] 朱旭鹏, 石惠民, 张轼, 陈智全, 郑梦洁, 王雅思, 薛书文, 张军, 段辉高 2019 物理学报 68 147304
Google Scholar
Zhu X P, Shi H M, Zhang S, Chen Z Q, Zheng M J, Wang Y S, Xue S W, Zhang J, Duan H G 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 147304
Google Scholar
[16] 林丹丽, 董旭, 查刘生 2018 分析测试学报 37 599
Google Scholar
Lin D L, Dong X, Zha L S 2018 J. Instr. Anal. 37 599
Google Scholar
[17] Chavez S, Aslam U, Linic S 2018 ACS Energy Lett. 3 1590
Google Scholar
[18] Yee K S 1966 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 14 302
Google Scholar
[19] Werner W S M, Glantschnig K, Ambroschdraxl C 2009 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 38 1013
Google Scholar
-
图 1 Yee网格和电磁场分量分布
Figure 1. Yee grid and electromagnetic field component distribution.
图 2 Ag@Ag, Ag@Pt, Pt@Ag纳米颗粒结构示意图
Figure 2. Structure diagrams of Ag@Ag, Ag@Pt, and Pt@Ag nanoparticles.
图 3 模型验证
Figure 3. Model validation.
图 4 壳层厚度为2 nm时不同核芯粒径纳米颗粒的吸收、散射和消光分数 (a) R = 10 nm, (b) R = 30 nm和(c) R = 50 nm的Ag@Ag纳米颗粒; (d) R = 10 nm, (e) R = 30 nm和(f) R = 50 nm的Ag@Pt纳米颗粒
Figure 4. Absorption, scattering, and extinction fraction of nanoparticles with a shell thickness of 2 nm and different core sizes: Ag@Ag nanoparticle with (a) R = 10 nm, (b) R = 30 nm, and (c) R = 50 nm; Ag@Pt nanoparticle with (d) R = 10 nm, (e) R = 30 nm, and (f) R = 50 nm.
图 5 Ag@Ag, Pt@Pt, Ag@Pt纳米颗粒吸收率随壳层厚度的变化
Figure 5. Shell thickness-resolved absorption rate of Ag@Ag, Pt@Pt, and Ag@Pt nanoparticles.
图 6 壳层厚度为2 nm时不同核芯粒径纳米颗粒吸收功率分布 (a) R = 90 nm的Ag@Ag纳米颗粒; (b) R = 90 nm的Ag@Pt纳米颗粒; (c) R = 160 nm的Ag@Ag纳米颗粒; (d) R = 160 nm的Ag@Pt纳米颗粒
Figure 6. Power absorption distributions of nanoparticles with a shell thickness of 2 nm and different core sizes: (a) Ag@Ag, (b) Ag@Pt nanoparticles with R = 90 nm; (c) Ag@Ag, (d) Ag@Pt nanoparticles with R = 160 nm.
图 7 核芯粒径为20 nm时不同壳层厚度(0.5—4.0 nm)纳米颗粒光学特性 (a) Ag@Ag纳米颗粒吸收截面; (b) Ag@Ag纳米颗粒散射截面; (c) Ag@Pt纳米颗粒吸收截面; (d) Ag@Pt纳米颗粒散射截面
Figure 7. Optical characteristics of nanoparticles with a core size of 20 nm and shell thickness ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 nm: (a) Absorption and (b) scattering cross-sections of Ag@Ag nanoparticle; (c) absorption and (d) scattering cross-section of Ag@Pt nanoparticle.
图 8 不同波长处Ag@Pt纳米颗粒的磁场分布和电场分布 (a) λ = 321.467 nm时的磁场分布; (b) λ = 380.452 nm时的磁场分布; (c) λ = 321.467 nm时的电场分布; (d) λ = 380.452 nm时的电场分布
Figure 8. Magnetic and electric fields distributions of Ag@Pt nanoparticle at different wavelengths: magnetic field distribution at (a) λ = 321.467 nm and (b) λ = 380.452 nm; electric field distribution at (c) λ = 321.467 nm and (d) λ = 380.452 nm.
图 9 核芯粒径为20 nm时不同壳层厚度Ag@Pt纳米颗粒磁场分布 (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm
Figure 9. Magnetic field distributions of Ag@Pt nanoparticles with a core diameter of 20 nm and different shell thicknesses: (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm.
图 10 核芯粒径为20 nm时不同壳层厚度Ag@Pt纳米颗粒电场分布 (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm
Figure 10. Electric field distributions of Ag@Pt nanoparticles with a core diameter of 20 nm and different shell thicknesses: (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm.
图 11 核芯粒径为20 nm时不同壳层厚度纳米颗粒的核芯、壳层及整体吸收功率 (a) Ag@Ag纳米颗粒核芯吸收功率; (b) Ag@Ag纳米颗粒壳层吸收功率; (c) Ag@Ag纳米颗粒整体吸收功率; (d) Ag@Pt纳米颗粒核芯吸收功率; (e) Ag@Pt纳米颗粒壳层吸收功率; (f) Ag@Pt纳米颗粒整体吸收功率
Figure 11. The core, shell, and total absorption power for nanoparticles with a core diameter of 20 nm and different shell thicknesses: (a) Core, (b) shell, and (c) total absorption power of Ag@Ag nanoparticle; (d) core, (e) shell, and (f) total absorption power of Ag@Pt nanoparticle.
图 12 核芯粒径为20 nm时不同壳层厚度Ag@Pt纳米颗粒吸收功率分布 (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm
Figure 12. Absorption power distributions of Ag@Pt nanoparticles with a core diameter of 20 nm and different shell thicknesses: (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm.
图 13 核芯粒径为20 nm时不同壳层厚度(0.5—4.0 nm)Pt@Ag纳米颗粒光学特性 (a) 吸收截面; (b) 散射截面
Figure 13. Optical characteristics of Pt@Ag nanoparticles with a core size of 20 nm and shell thickness ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 nm: (a) Absorption; (b) scattering cross-sections.
图 14 核芯粒径为20 nm时不同壳层厚度Pt@Ag纳米颗粒磁场分布 (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm
Figure 14. Magnetic field distributions of Pt@Ag nanoparticles with a core diameter of 20 nm and different shell thicknesses: (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm.
图 15 核芯粒径为20 nm时不同壳层厚度Pt@Ag纳米颗粒电场分布 (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm
Figure 15. Electric field distributions of Pt@Ag nanoparticles with a core diameter of 20 nm and different shell thicknesses: (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm.
图 16 核芯粒径为20 nm时不同壳层厚度Pt@Ag纳米颗粒吸收功率分布 (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm
Figure 16. Absorption power distributions of Pt@Ag nanoparticles with a core diameter of 20 nm and different shell thicknesses: (a) δ = 1 nm; (b) δ = 2 nm; (c) δ = 3 nm; (d) δ = 4 nm.
表 1 不同核芯粒径纳米颗粒吸收率
Table 1. Absorption rates of nanoparticles with different core diameters.
粒径 Ag@Ag Pt@Pt Ag@Pt 10 99.35388 98.83842 99.10692 20 96.74429 94.42934 96.2321 30 91.13893 85.96076 90.56968 40 82.35913 74.56753 81.94677 50 71.23316 62.38762 71.04794 60 59.45618 51.03633 59.38077 70 48.74191 41.28534 48.67587 80 39.95935 33.41646 39.92148 90 33.36999 27.58678 33.36847 100 28.58948 23.5064 28.66334 110 25.17954 20.72087 25.32529 120 22.68521 18.76733 22.89612 130 20.79657 17.31771 21.04747 140 19.31163 16.19143 19.58624 150 18.13054 15.28556 18.40958 160 17.19572 14.55712 17.47313 170 16.47972 13.97061 16.74523 180 15.94531 13.51242 16.203 190 15.55694 13.16834 15.81046 200 15.28101 12.92298 15.53383 
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Cao C, Zhao Z Y, Zhang Y M, Peng S 2020 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 53 265103
Google Scholar
[2] 刘海舟, 喻小强, 李金磊, 徐凝, 周林, 朱嘉 2019 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 49 17
Google Scholar
Liu H Z, Yu X Q, Li J L, Xu N, Zhou L, Zhu J 2019 Sci China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 49 17
Google Scholar
[3] Kunwar S, Pandit S, Jeong J H, Lee J 2020 Nano-Micro Lett. 12 91
[4] 任益弘, 朱君, 李娜, 王各, 娄健 2020 激光杂志 41 1
Google Scholar
Ren Y H, Zhu J, Li N, Wang G, Lou J 2020 Laser J. 41 1
Google Scholar
[5] Wang T M, Tang G H, Du M 2020 Appl. Therm. Eng. 173 115182
Google Scholar
[6] 殷澄, 陆成杰, 笪婧, 张瑞耕, 阚雪芬, 韩庆邦, 许田 2021 物理学报 70 024201
Google Scholar
Yin C, Lu C J, Da J, Zhang R G, Kan X F, Han Q B, Xu T 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 024201
Google Scholar
[7] 彭浩程, 葛成, 周婧, 陈鹏, 施毅, 张荣, 郑有炓 2020 光电子技术 40 176
Google Scholar
Peng H C, Ge C, Zhou J, Chen P, Shi Y, Zhang R, Zheng Y L 2020 Optoe. Technol. 40 176
Google Scholar
[8] Chen M J, He Y R, Wang X Z, Hu Y W 2018 Appl. Energy 211 735
Google Scholar
[9] Tunkara E, DeJarnette D, Saunders A E, Baldwin M, Otanicar T, Roberts K P 2019 Appl. Energy 252 113459
Google Scholar
[10] Yu X X, Xuan Y M 2018 Sol. Energy 160 200
Google Scholar
[11] 刘兵, 宫辉力, 刘锐, 胡长文 2019 应用化学 36 939
Google Scholar
Liu B, Gong H L, Liu R, Hu C W 2019 Chin. J. Appl. Chem. 36 939
Google Scholar
[12] 朱群志, 蒋瑜毅 2017 光散射学报 29 222
Google Scholar
Zhu Q Z, Jiang Y Y 2017 Chin. J. Light Scatt. 29 222
Google Scholar
[13] Manjavacas A, Liu J G, Kulkarni V, Nordlander P 2014 ACS Nano 8 7630
Google Scholar
[14] Linic S, Aslam U, Boerigter C, Morabito M 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 567
Google Scholar
[15] 朱旭鹏, 石惠民, 张轼, 陈智全, 郑梦洁, 王雅思, 薛书文, 张军, 段辉高 2019 物理学报 68 147304
Google Scholar
Zhu X P, Shi H M, Zhang S, Chen Z Q, Zheng M J, Wang Y S, Xue S W, Zhang J, Duan H G 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 147304
Google Scholar
[16] 林丹丽, 董旭, 查刘生 2018 分析测试学报 37 599
Google Scholar
Lin D L, Dong X, Zha L S 2018 J. Instr. Anal. 37 599
Google Scholar
[17] Chavez S, Aslam U, Linic S 2018 ACS Energy Lett. 3 1590
Google Scholar
[18] Yee K S 1966 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 14 302
Google Scholar
[19] Werner W S M, Glantschnig K, Ambroschdraxl C 2009 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 38 1013
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 3538
- PDF Downloads: 73
- Cited By: 0
