Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Stationary structures of spin-orbit coupled polariton condensates in Bessel lattices

Chen Hai-Jun Ren Yuan Wang Hua

Citation:

Stationary structures of spin-orbit coupled polariton condensates in Bessel lattices

Chen Hai-Jun, Ren Yuan, Wang Hua
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Bessel optical lattice yields a non-spatially periodic column-symmetric optical lattice potential field, which has the characteristics of both infinite deep potential well and the ring-shaped potential well. A deep potential is formed in the center of the 0-order Bessel optical lattice. In the non-zero-order Beseel optical lattice, a ring-shaped shallow potential well with a central barrier can be formed. Exciton-polariton is a semi-light and semi-matter quasi-particle, which can achieve the Bose-Einstein condensate phase transition even at room temperature to form a polariton condensate. In addition, the polariton condensate is likely to realize sufficiently strong spin-orbit coupling due to the cavity-induced TE-TM splitting of the polariton energy levels. The polariton condensate can be realized at room temperature, and there can be spin-orbit coupling in it, which provides a new platform for the studying of quantum physics. In this paper, the Bessel optical lattice is introduced into a polariton condensate. The stationary state structure of spinor two-component polariton condensate with spin-orbit coupling is investigated. By solving the Gross-Pitaevskii equation, we first give a stationary state structures of the polariton condensate both in the laboratory coordinate frame and in the rotating coordinate frame. Owing to the introduction of the Bessel optical lattice, the stationary state structures of polariton condensate are diverse. We dispaly the stationary state structures of the basic Gaussian solitons and multipole solitons in the central deep potential well in the laboratory coordinate frame, and the ring solitons and multipole solitons in the central shallow potential well. We also dispaly the vortex ring soliton that exists in the rotating coordinate frame, and the stationary state structure of the component separation caused by the spin-orbit interaction. We analyze not only the influences of the spin-orbit coupling on the stationary state structures in the two coordinate frames, but also the stability of the multipole solitons in the rotating coordinate frame. It is found that the multipole solitons formed in the ring-shaped shallow potential well have better stability than in the central deep potential well, and they can maintain the relative structure and spatial distribution for a long time in the rotation process. In the rotating coordinate frame, even if the two-component separation conditions are not satisfied, the introduction of spin-orbit coupling can cause the two components to separate.
      Corresponding author: Ren Yuan, renyuan_823@aliyun.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62173342, 11772001) and the Beijing Youth Top-Notch Talent Support Program, China (Grant No. 2017000026833ZK23)
    [1]

    Weisbuch C, Nishioka M, Ishikawa A, Arakawa Y 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 3314Google Scholar

    [2]

    Xu X R, Zhang Z D, Liang Z X 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 033317Google Scholar

    [3]

    Christopoulos S, Baldassarri Höger von Högersthal G, Grundy A J D, Lagoudakis P G, Kavokin A V, Baumberg J J, Christmann G, Butté R, Feltin E, Carlin J F, Grandjean N 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 126405Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ma X K, Egorov O A, Schumacher S 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 157401Google Scholar

    [5]

    Roumpos G, Fraser M D, Löffler A, Höfling S, Forchel A, Yamamoto Y 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 129

    [6]

    Carusotto I, Ciuti C 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 299

    [7]

    Salerno M, Abdullaev F Kh, Gammal A, Tomio L 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 043602Google Scholar

    [8]

    Galitski V, Spielman I B 2013 Nature 494 49Google Scholar

    [9]

    Osterloh K, Baig M, Santos L, Zoller P, Lewenstein M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 010403Google Scholar

    [10]

    Gautam S, Adhikari S K 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013629Google Scholar

    [11]

    Matuszewski M, Liew T C H, Rubo Y G, Kavokin A V 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 115321Google Scholar

    [12]

    Sala V G, Solnyshkov D D, Carusotto I, Jacqmin T, Lemaître A, Terças H, Nalitov A, Abbarchi M, Galopin E, Sagnes I, Bloch J, Malpuech G, Amo A 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 011034Google Scholar

    [13]

    Bhat I A, Mithun T, Malomed B A, Porsezian K 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 063606Google Scholar

    [14]

    Bardyn C E, Karzig T, Refael G, Liew T C H 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 161413Google Scholar

    [15]

    Lobanov V E, Kartashov Y V, Konotop V V 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 180403Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kartashov Y V, Skryabin D V 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 5043Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zezyulin D A, Kartashov Y V, Skryabin D V, Shelykh I A 2018 ACS Photonics 5 3634Google Scholar

    [18]

    Mandel O, Greiner M, Widera A, Rom T, Hänsch T W, Bloch I 2003 Nature 425 937Google Scholar

    [19]

    Durnin J 1987 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4 651Google Scholar

    [20]

    Vasara A, Turunen J, Friberg A T 1989 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6 1748Google Scholar

    [21]

    Arlt J, Dholakia K 2000 Opt. Commun. 177 297Google Scholar

    [22]

    Kartashov Y V, Carretero-Gonzalez R, Malomed B A, Vysloukh V A, Torner L 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 043902Google Scholar

    [23]

    Mihalache D, Mazilu D, Lederer F, Malomed B A, Kartashov Y V, Crasovan L C, Torner L 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 023902Google Scholar

    [24]

    Dong L W, Wang J D, Wang H, Yin G Y 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 013807Google Scholar

    [25]

    Kartashov Y V, Vysloukh V A, Torner L 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 093904Google Scholar

    [26]

    Chen H B, Hu S M 2013 Eur. Phys. J. D 67 225Google Scholar

    [27]

    Richard M, Kasprzak J, André R, Romestain R, Dang L S, Malpuech G, Kavokin A 2005 Phys. Rev.B 72 201301Google Scholar

    [28]

    Nalitov A V, Liew T C H, Kavokin A V, Altshuler B L, Rubo Y G 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 067406Google Scholar

    [29]

    Flayac H, Shelykh I A, Solnyshkov D D, Malpuech G 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 045318Google Scholar

    [30]

    Dufferwiel S, Li F, Cancellieri E, Giriunas L, Trichet A A P, Whittaker D M, Walker P M, Fras F, Clarke E, Smith J M, Skolnick M S, Krizhanovskii D N 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 246401Google Scholar

    [31]

    Padhi B, Duboscq R, Niranjan A, Soni R K 2015 Eur. Phys. J. B 88 116Google Scholar

    [32]

    Sinha S, Castin Y 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 190402Google Scholar

    [33]

    Fetter A L 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 647Google Scholar

    [34]

    Muruganandam P, Adhikari S K 2009 Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 1888Google Scholar

    [35]

    Bao W Z, Cai Y Y 2013 Kinetic and Related Models 6 1Google Scholar

    [36]

    Wen L H, Zhang Y P, Feng J 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 225302Google Scholar

    [37]

    Timmermans E 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 5718Google Scholar

    [38]

    Moxley F I, Dowling J P, Dai W Z, Byrnes T 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 053603Google Scholar

  • 图 1  不同阶数n的Bessel型光晶格势场的空间分布 (a)$n=0$; (b)$n=1$; (c)$n=2$; (d)$n=3$. $x, y\in [-8, 8]$. 势场的数学表达式为$-V_0 {\rm{J}}_{n}^2(\sqrt{2 b}r)$, 其中$V_0=1,\; b=0.5$

    Figure 1.  The BL potential $-V_0 {\rm{J}}_{n}^2(\sqrt{2 b}r)$ with different n: (a)$n=0$; (b)$n=1$; (c)$n=2$; (d)$n=3$. $x, y\in [-8, 8]$, $V_0=1,\; b=0.5$

    图 2  0阶BL中央深势阱中的(a)高斯型孤立子、(b)偶极孤立子和(c)四极孤立子的密度分布; (d)与图(c)对应的相位分布. 图(a)和图(b)的计算范围是$x, y\in [-8, 8]$, 图(c)和图(d)的计算范围是$x, y\in [-3, 3]$, BL参数分别是(a)$V_0=1$; (b)$V_0=4, $$ b=0.4$; (c), (d)$V_0=20$

    Figure 2.  Densities of (a) Gassian, (b) dipolar, (c) quadrupolar solitons and (d) the phase of the quadrupolar soliton in the central deep potential well of the BL, where $x, y\in [-8, 8]$ for panels (a) and (b), $x, y\in [-3, 3]$ for panels (c) and (d). Values of other parameters are $V_0=1$ for panel (a), $V_0=4, b=0.4$ for panel (b), $V_0=20$ for panels (c) and (d).

    图 3  BL环状浅势阱中极化激元凝聚环状孤立子稳态结构的密度分布$|\psi_{1, 2}|^2$随阶数n的变化, 计算范围$x, y\in [-8, 8]$, 角速率$\varOmega=0$, SOC作用强度$\alpha=0$. BL参数分别是 (a) $V_0=10,\; n=1$; (b) $V_0=10,\; n=2$; (c) $V_0=20, \;n=3$

    Figure 3.  Densities $|\psi_{1, 2}|^2$ of ring-shaped solitons in the ring-shaped shallow potential well of the BL with different $(V_0, n)$: (a) (10, 1); (b) (10, 2); (c) (20, 3). $x, y\in [-8, 8]$, $\varOmega=0$, $\alpha=0$.

    图 4  BL环状浅势阱中极化激元凝聚多极孤立子稳态结构的密度分布$|\psi_{1, 2}|^2$, 计算范围$x, y\in [-8, 8]$, 角速率$\varOmega=0$, SOC作用强度$\alpha=0$, $n=3$. $V_0$$n_{\rm{p}}$分别是 (a) $V_0=30,\; n_{\rm{p}}=2$; (b) $V_0=30,\; n_{\rm{p}}=4$; (c) $V_0=30,\; n_{\rm{p}}=6$; (d)$V_0=60, \;n_{\rm{p}}=8$; (e) $V_0=60,\; n_{\rm{p}}=10$; (f) $V_0=70,\; n_{\rm{p}}=12$

    Figure 4.  Densities ($|\psi_{1, 2}|^2$) of multipole solitons in the ring-shaped shallow potential well of BL with different $(V_0, n_{\rm{p}})$: (a) (30, 2); (b) (30, 4); (c) (30, 6); (d) (60, 8); (e) (60, 10); (f) (70, 12). $x, y\in [-8, 8]$, $\varOmega=0$, $\alpha=0$, $n=3$.

    图 5  BL势场中央深势阱中基础孤立子稳态结构的密度分布$|\psi_{1, 2}|^2$随SOC作用强度α的变化 (a)$\alpha=0.3$; (b) $\alpha=0.4$; (c) $\alpha=0.495$; (d)$\alpha=0.499$. 计算范围$x, y\in [-3, 3]$, BL参数为$V_0=1.0, n=0$, 角速率$\varOmega=0$

    Figure 5.  Densities $|\psi_{1, 2}|^2$ of fundamental solitons in the central deep potential well of the BL with different α: (a) $\alpha=0.3$; (b) $\alpha=0.4$; (c) $\alpha=0.495$; (d) $\alpha=0.499$. $x, y\in [-3, 3]$, $\varOmega=0$, $V_0=1.0, n=0$.

    图 6  存在SOC作用时, 不同阶数BL势场环状浅势阱中极化激元凝聚稳态结构的密度分布$|\psi_{1, 2}|^2$. 计算范围$x, y\in [-8, 8]$, 角速率$\varOmega=0$, SOC作用强度$\alpha=0.2$. BL参数分别是 (a) $V_0=10,\; n=1$; (b) $V_0=10,\; n=2$; (c), (d) $V_0=20,\; n=3$

    Figure 6.  In the presence of SOC, the densities ($|\psi_{1, 2}|^2$) of stationary state structures in the ring-shaped shallow potential well of the BL with different $V_0$ and n: (a) $V_0=10,\; n=1$; (b) $V_0=10,\; n=2$; (c), (d) $V_0=20,\; n=3$. $x, y\in [-8, 8]$, $\varOmega=0$, $\alpha=0.2$.

    图 7  无SOC作用, 旋转坐标系中, 处于BL环状浅势阱中极化激元凝聚的涡旋孤立子结构的密度((a), (c))和相位((b), (d))分布, BL参数为$V_0=10, n=3$, 计算范围$x, y\in [-8, 8]$, $\alpha=0$. 角速率分别是0.05((a), (b))和0.1((c), (d))

    Figure 7.  In the absence of SOC, the densities ((a), (c)) and phases ((b), (d)) vortex solitons in the ring-shaped shallow potential well of the BL in the rotating coordinate frame with different $\varOmega $ (0.05 for panels (a) and (b), and 0.1 for panels (c) and (d)), where $x, y\in [-8, 8]$, $\alpha=0$, $V_0=10, n=3$.

    图 8  存在SOC作用时, 不同角速率下形成的涡旋孤立子的密度和相位分布 (a) –0.15; (b) 0; (c) 0.15. 计算范围$x, y\in [-8, 8]$, $\alpha=0.1$, $V_0=10,\; n=3$

    Figure 8.  In the presence of SOC, the densities and phases of vortex solitons in the ring-shaped shallow potential well of the BL with different $\varOmega $: (a) –0.15; (b) 0; (c) 0.15. $x, y\in [-8, 8]$, $V_0=10,\; n=3$, $\alpha=0.1$.

    图 9  BL势场的径向缩放因子b对中央深势阱中涡旋稳态结构的密度和相位的影响 (a) $b=0.1$; (b) $b=0.2$; (c) $b=0.3$; (d)$b=0.4$. 计算范围$x, y\in [-2, 2]$, SOC作用强度$\alpha=0.4$, BL参数为$V_0=40, n=0$, 旋转角速率$\varOmega=0.95$

    Figure 9.  Densities and phases of stationary vortex structures in the central deep potential of the BL with different b: (a) $b=0.1$; (b) $b=0.2$; (c)$b=0.3$; (d)$b=0.4$. $x, y\in [-2, 2]$, $\alpha=0.4$, $V_0=40, n=0$, $\varOmega=0.95$.

    图 10  BL势场中多极孤立子在旋转过程中, 密度分布$|\psi_{1, 2}|^2$随时间变化, 旋转角速率为$\varOmega=0.1$

    Figure 10.  Evolution dynamics of the multipolar solitions in the BL with $\varOmega=0.1$

  • [1]

    Weisbuch C, Nishioka M, Ishikawa A, Arakawa Y 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 3314Google Scholar

    [2]

    Xu X R, Zhang Z D, Liang Z X 2020 Phys. Rev. A 102 033317Google Scholar

    [3]

    Christopoulos S, Baldassarri Höger von Högersthal G, Grundy A J D, Lagoudakis P G, Kavokin A V, Baumberg J J, Christmann G, Butté R, Feltin E, Carlin J F, Grandjean N 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 126405Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ma X K, Egorov O A, Schumacher S 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 157401Google Scholar

    [5]

    Roumpos G, Fraser M D, Löffler A, Höfling S, Forchel A, Yamamoto Y 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 129

    [6]

    Carusotto I, Ciuti C 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 299

    [7]

    Salerno M, Abdullaev F Kh, Gammal A, Tomio L 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 043602Google Scholar

    [8]

    Galitski V, Spielman I B 2013 Nature 494 49Google Scholar

    [9]

    Osterloh K, Baig M, Santos L, Zoller P, Lewenstein M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 010403Google Scholar

    [10]

    Gautam S, Adhikari S K 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013629Google Scholar

    [11]

    Matuszewski M, Liew T C H, Rubo Y G, Kavokin A V 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 115321Google Scholar

    [12]

    Sala V G, Solnyshkov D D, Carusotto I, Jacqmin T, Lemaître A, Terças H, Nalitov A, Abbarchi M, Galopin E, Sagnes I, Bloch J, Malpuech G, Amo A 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 011034Google Scholar

    [13]

    Bhat I A, Mithun T, Malomed B A, Porsezian K 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 063606Google Scholar

    [14]

    Bardyn C E, Karzig T, Refael G, Liew T C H 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 161413Google Scholar

    [15]

    Lobanov V E, Kartashov Y V, Konotop V V 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 180403Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kartashov Y V, Skryabin D V 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 5043Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zezyulin D A, Kartashov Y V, Skryabin D V, Shelykh I A 2018 ACS Photonics 5 3634Google Scholar

    [18]

    Mandel O, Greiner M, Widera A, Rom T, Hänsch T W, Bloch I 2003 Nature 425 937Google Scholar

    [19]

    Durnin J 1987 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4 651Google Scholar

    [20]

    Vasara A, Turunen J, Friberg A T 1989 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6 1748Google Scholar

    [21]

    Arlt J, Dholakia K 2000 Opt. Commun. 177 297Google Scholar

    [22]

    Kartashov Y V, Carretero-Gonzalez R, Malomed B A, Vysloukh V A, Torner L 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 043902Google Scholar

    [23]

    Mihalache D, Mazilu D, Lederer F, Malomed B A, Kartashov Y V, Crasovan L C, Torner L 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 023902Google Scholar

    [24]

    Dong L W, Wang J D, Wang H, Yin G Y 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 013807Google Scholar

    [25]

    Kartashov Y V, Vysloukh V A, Torner L 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 093904Google Scholar

    [26]

    Chen H B, Hu S M 2013 Eur. Phys. J. D 67 225Google Scholar

    [27]

    Richard M, Kasprzak J, André R, Romestain R, Dang L S, Malpuech G, Kavokin A 2005 Phys. Rev.B 72 201301Google Scholar

    [28]

    Nalitov A V, Liew T C H, Kavokin A V, Altshuler B L, Rubo Y G 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 067406Google Scholar

    [29]

    Flayac H, Shelykh I A, Solnyshkov D D, Malpuech G 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 045318Google Scholar

    [30]

    Dufferwiel S, Li F, Cancellieri E, Giriunas L, Trichet A A P, Whittaker D M, Walker P M, Fras F, Clarke E, Smith J M, Skolnick M S, Krizhanovskii D N 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 246401Google Scholar

    [31]

    Padhi B, Duboscq R, Niranjan A, Soni R K 2015 Eur. Phys. J. B 88 116Google Scholar

    [32]

    Sinha S, Castin Y 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 190402Google Scholar

    [33]

    Fetter A L 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 647Google Scholar

    [34]

    Muruganandam P, Adhikari S K 2009 Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 1888Google Scholar

    [35]

    Bao W Z, Cai Y Y 2013 Kinetic and Related Models 6 1Google Scholar

    [36]

    Wen L H, Zhang Y P, Feng J 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 225302Google Scholar

    [37]

    Timmermans E 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 5718Google Scholar

    [38]

    Moxley F I, Dowling J P, Dai W Z, Byrnes T 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 053603Google Scholar

  • [1] Qian Li-Ming, Sun Meng-Ran, Zheng Gai-Ge. Coupling interactions of anisotropic hyperbolic phonon polaritons in double layered orthorhombic molybdenum trioxide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(7): 077101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222144
    [2] Stationary structures of spin-orbit coupled polariton condensates in the Bessel lattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211949
    [3] Li Yang, Song Yong-Shun, Li Ming, Zhou Xin. Simulation studies on the diffusion of water solitons in carbon nanotube. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(14): 140202. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.140202
    [4] Bao Jin, Yan Cui-Ling, Yan Zu-Wei. Surface and interface phonon-polaritons in four layer systems consisting of polar ternary mixed crystals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(10): 107105. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.107105
    [5] Yong Wen-Mei, Chen Hai-Jun. Stability of dipolar soliton in crossed linear and nonlinear optical lattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(15): 150302. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.150302
    [6] Chen Hai-Jun, Zhang Yao-Wen. Stabilization of matter-wave solitons in Bessel optical lattice by spatial modulation of the nonlinearity. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(22): 220303. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.220303
    [7] Teng Jian, Zhu Bin, Wang Jian, Hong Wei, Yan Yong-Hong, Zhao Zong-Qing, Cao Lei-Feng, Gu Yu-Qiu. Simulation of electromagnetic soliton radiography under laser-produced proton beam. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(11): 114103. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.114103
    [8] Chen Hai-Jun, Li Xiang-Fu. The stability of matter-wave solitons in 2D linear and nonlinear optical lattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(7): 070302. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.070302
    [9] Mo Jia-Qi, Cheng Yan. Approximate solution of homotopic mapping for generalized Boussinesq equation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(7): 4379-4382. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.4379
    [10] Chen Hai-Jun, Xue Ju-Kui. The ground state solutions of two-component Bose-Einstein condensates in Bessel optical lattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(7): 3962-3968. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3962
    [11] Gong Zhi-Qiang, He Meng-Dong. Localized interface phonon polaritons in two coupled semi-infinite superlattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(11): 6600-6607. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6600
    [12] Mo Jia-Qi, Zhang Wei-Jiang, He Ming. The solitary wave approximate solution of strongly nonlinear evolution equations. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(4): 1843-1846. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1843
    [13] Mo Jia-Qi, Zhang Wei-Jiang, Chen Xian-Feng. The homotopic solving method of solitary wave for strong nonlinear evolution equation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(11): 6169-6172. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6169
    [14] Li Bai-Wen, Zheng Chun-Yang, Song Min, Liu Zhan-Jun. Stimulated Raman cascade-into-photon condensation and ultra-intense EM solitons in laser plasma interaction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(10): 5325-5337. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5325
    [15] Huang Ling. Symmetries and symmetry reductions of the coupled Burgers equation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(8): 3864-3868. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3864
    [16] Ren Xue-Zao, Liao Xu, Liu Tao, Wang Ke-Lin. The influence of the electron and one pair of phonons interaction on Holstein polaron. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(6): 2865-2870. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2865
    [17] Miao Ming-Chuan, Xu Ze-Da, Hou Gang, Fan Shang-Chun. Transient and steady-state multi-wave nonlinear optical properties of liquid crystal film. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(10): 4776-4781. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4776
    [18] Niu Jia-Sheng, Ma Ben-Kun. Solitonpropertiesoflighttransportationinioniccrystalsgeneratedbynonlineareffects. Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(12): 2818-2822. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2818
    [19] SHE WEI-LONG, LEE WING-KEE. ALL OPTICAL DOUBLE QUASI-STEADY-STATE SPATIAL SOLITON. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(5): 886-891. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.886
    [20] GUO RU, PAN SHI-HONG, ZHANG GUANG-YIN. STEADY-STATE BEAM FANNING IN PHOTOREFRACTIVE CRYSTALS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1996, 45(12): 2005-2009. doi: 10.7498/aps.45.2005
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  2717
  • PDF Downloads:  60
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  20 October 2021
  • Accepted Date:  10 November 2021
  • Available Online:  22 February 2022
  • Published Online:  05 March 2022

/

返回文章
返回