-
Transition metal phthalocyanine molecules serve as building blocks for two-dimensional (2D) metal-organic frameworks with potential applications in optics, electronics, and spintronics. Previous theoretical studies predicted that a two-dimensional transition metal phthalocyanine framework with kagome lattice (kag-TMPc) has stable magnetically ordered properties, which are promising for spintronics and optoelectronics. However, there is a lack of studies on their heterojunctions, which can effectively tune the properties through interlayer coupling despite its weak nature. Here we use the density functional theory (DFT) to calculate the electronic properties of eight representative 2D kag-TMPc vertical heterojunctions with two different stackings (AA and AB) and interlayer distances. We find that most of the kag-MnPc-based heterojunctions can maintain the electronic properties of monolayer materials with low bandgap. The kag-MnPc/ZnPc is a ferromagnetic semiconductor with magnetic exchange energy above 40 meV, regardless of stacking sequences; the electronic properties of kag-MnPc/MnPc heterojunctions change from magnetic half-metal to magnetic semiconductor during the transition from AA stacking to AB stacking. Interestingly, the AB stacked kag-CuPc/CoPc heterojunction is a ferromagnetic semiconductor, and the spin-polarized energy band arrangement changes with the layer spacing: when the layer spacing is as long as the equilibrium distance, the spin-up and spin-down energy bands are aligned as type II; when the layer spacing increases by 0.2 Å, the spin-up energy bands are aligned as type-I energy bands, while the spin-down energy bands are aligned as type-II energy bands. This distance-dependent spin properties can realize magnetic optoelectronic “switching” and has potential applications in new magnetic field modulated electromagnetic and optoelectronic devices.
-
Keywords:
- magnetic material /
- heterojunction /
- first principles /
- metal organic framework
[1] Lu S, Liu L B, Demissie H, An G Y, Wang D S 2021 Environ. Int. 146 106273
Google Scholar
[2] Wei X Q, Shao D, Xue C L, Qu X Y, Chai J, Li J Q, Du Y E, Chen Y Q 2020 CrystEngComm 22 5275
Google Scholar
[3] Thorarinsdottir A E, Harris T D 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 8716
Google Scholar
[4] Van Heumen E 2021 Nat. Mater. 20 1308
Google Scholar
[5] Yang Y X, Fan W H, Zhang Q H, Chen Z X, Chen X, Ying T P, Wu X X, Yang X F, Meng F Q, Li G, Li S Y, Gu L, Qian T, Schnyder A P, Guo J G, Chen X L 2021 Chin. Phys. Lett. 38 127102
Google Scholar
[6] Zeng K Y, Song F Y, Ling L S, Tong W, Li S L, Tian Z M, Ma L, Pi L 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 107501
Google Scholar
[7] Yang Y Y, Chen K W, Ding Z F, Hillier A D, Shu L 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 107502
Google Scholar
[8] Chen H Q, Shan H, Zhao A D, Li B 2019 Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 32 563
Google Scholar
[9] Kambe T, Sakamoto R, Hoshiko K, Takada K, Miyachi M, Ryu J H, Sasaki S, Kim J, Nakazato K, Takata M, Nishihara H 2013 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 2462
Google Scholar
[10] Wang Z F, Su N H, Liu F 2013 Nano Lett. 13 2842
Google Scholar
[11] Abel M, Clair S, Ourdjini O, Mossoyan M, Porte L 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 1203
Google Scholar
[12] Zhou J, Sun Q 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 15113
Google Scholar
[13] Xu Y N, Gu Z Q, Ching W Y 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 87 4867
Google Scholar
[14] Lü K, Zhou J, Zhou L, Wang Q, Sun Q, Jena P 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 163104
Google Scholar
[15] Xie L S, Jin G X, He L, Bauer G E W, Barker J, Xia K 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 014423
Google Scholar
[16] Ma Y D, Dai Y, Guo M, Niu C W, Huang B B 2011 Nanoscale 3 3883
Google Scholar
[17] Li X D, Yu S, Wu S Q, Wen Y H, Zhou S, Zhu Z Z 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 15347
Google Scholar
[18] Dean C R, Young A F, Meric I, Lee C, Wang L, Sorgenfrei S, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Kim P, Shepard K L, Hone J 2010 Nat. Nanotech. 5 722
Google Scholar
[19] Lin X, Xu Y, Hakro A A, Hasan T, Hao R, Zhang B, Chen H 2013 J. Mater. Chem. C 1 1618
Google Scholar
[20] Guo L J, Hu J S, Ma X G, Xiang J 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 097101
Google Scholar
[21] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169
Google Scholar
[22] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Comp. Mater. Sci. 6 15
Google Scholar
[23] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
Google Scholar
[24] Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953
Google Scholar
[25] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
Google Scholar
[26] Panchmatia P M, Sanyal B, Oppeneer P M 2008 Chemical Physics 343 47
Google Scholar
[27] Bernien M, Miguel J, Weis C, Ali Md E, Kurde J, Krumme B, Panchmatia P M, Sanyal B, Piantek M, Srivastava P, Baberschke K, Oppeneer P M, Eriksson O, Kuch W, Wende H 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 047202
Google Scholar
[28] Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 132 154104
Google Scholar
[29] Ningrum V P, Liu B, Wang W, Yin Y, Cao Y, Zha C, Xie H, Jiang X, Sun Y, Qin S, Chen X, Qin T, Zhu C, Wang L, Huang W 2020 Research 2020 1768918
Google Scholar
[30] Jiang X, Jiang Z, Zhao J J 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 253904
Google Scholar
[31] Yu J T, Jiang Z, Hao Y F, Zhu Q H, Zhao M L, Jiang X, Zhao J J 2018 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 30 25LT02
Google Scholar
[32] Deng Z X, Wang X H 2019 RSC Adv. 9 26024
Google Scholar
[33] Ben Aziza Z, Pierucci D, Henck H, Silly M G, David C, Yoon M, Sirotti F, Xiao K, Eddrief M, Girard J C, Ouerghi A 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 035407
Google Scholar
[34] Tongay S, Fan W, Kang J, Park J, Koldemir U, Suh J, Narang D S, Liu K, Ji J, Li J B, Sinclair R, Wu J Q 2014 Nano Lett. 14 3185
Google Scholar
-
图 1 AA和AB堆叠kag-TMPc异质结 (a)俯视图和(b)侧视图; (c) kag-MnPc, (d) kag-FePc, (e) kag-CoPc, (f) kag-CuPc的能带结构
Figure 1. Atomic structure of (a) AA stacking and (b) AB stacking heterostructures in kag-TMPc unit cell from a top view (upper panel) and side view (lower panel), respectively; band structures of monolayer (c) kag-MnPc, (d) kag-FePc, (e) kag-CoPc, (f) kag-CuPc.
图 2 从AA移动到AB堆叠过程中, kag-MnPc/McPc异质结结构框架的示意图与能带图
Figure 2. Schematic models and band structures of kag-MnPc/McPc heterostructure from AA to AB stacking pattern.
图 3 在(a) 0.00, (b) 0.33, (c) 0.50, (d) 0.67, (e) 1.00比例下, kag-MnPc/McPc异质结原子投影能带图; (f)带隙随比例的变化图
Figure 3. Atom-projected band structures of kag-MnPc/McPc heterostructure in (a) 0.00, (b) 0.33, (c) 0.50, (d) 0.67, (e) 1.00 movement ratios; (f) bandgap as a function of movement ratio.
图 4 kag-CoPc/CoPc异质结铁磁态和反铁磁态的磁构型
Figure 4. Illustration of three possible spin orders: FM state, AFM1 state, and AFM2 state of kag-CoPc/CoPc.
图 5 AA和AB堆叠的kag-MnPc/MnPc, kag-MnPc/CuPc, kag-MnPc/ZnPc异质结能带带隙对比
Figure 5. Comparison of bandgaps of kag-MnPc/MnPc, kag-MnPc/CuPc, and kag-MnPc/ZnPc heterostructures in AA and AB stacking.
图 6 (a) AA, (b) AB堆叠的kag-MnPc/kag-MnPc同质结能带; 其中绿色代表自旋向上, 蓝色代表自旋向下, 1-kag-MnPc为同质结的第一层, 2-kag-MnPc为同质结的第二层
Figure 6. Band structures of kag-MnPc/kag-MnPc homostructure in (a) AA and (b) AB stacking. Green and blue lines represent spin up and spin down electronic structures, respectively.
图 8 AB堆叠的kag-MnPc/kag-ZnPc异质结的能带图, 绿色代表自旋向上, 蓝色代表自旋向下
Figure 8. Band structures of kag-MnPc/kag-ZnPc heterostructure in AB stacking. Green and blue lines represent spin up and spin down electronic structures, respectively.
图 7 (a) AA, (b) AB堆叠的kag-MnPc/kag-CuPc异质结的能带图; 其中绿色代表自旋向上, 蓝色代表自旋向下, kag-MnPc为Mn原子所在的单层, kag-CuPc为Cu原子所在的单层
Figure 7. Band structures of kag-MnPc/kag-CuPc heterostructure in (a) AA and (b) AB stacking. Green and blue lines represent spin up and spin down bands, respectively.
图 9 不同层间距下AB堆叠kag-CoPc/CuPc异质结的能带图 (a) 3.254 Å; (b) 3.354 Å; (c) 3.454 Å; (d) 3.554 Å; (e) 3.654 Å
Figure 9. Spin-polarized band structures of AB stacking kag-CoPc/CuPc heterostructures in different interlayer distance: (a) 3.254 Å; (b) 3.354 Å; (c) 3.454 Å; (d) 3.554 Å; (e) 3.654 Å.
图 10 不同层间距下AB堆叠kag-CoPc/CuPc异质结的(a)—(d)能级位置变化和(e)能带排列
Figure 10. (a)–(d) Energy level and (e) band alignment of AB stacking kag-CoPc/CuPc heterostructures in different interlayer distance.
图 11 不同层间距下AB堆叠kag-CoPc/CuPc异质结的单层投影能带图 (a) 3.267 Å; (b) 3.367 Å; (c) 3.467 Å; (d) 3.567 Å; (e) 3.667 Å
Figure 11. Layer-projected band structures of AB stacking kag-CoPc/CuPc heterostructures in different interlayer distance: (a) 3.267 Å; (b) 3.367 Å; (c) 3.467 Å; (d) 3.567 Å; (e) 3.667 Å.
表 1 kag-TMPc (TM = Cr, Mn, Co, Cu, Zn)的晶格常数、带隙和磁矩(MTM)
Table 1. Lattice parameters, bandgaps and magnetic moments on TM atom (MTM) of kag-TMPc (TM = Cr, Mn, Co, Cu and Zn).
Monolayer Lattice parameter/Å Bandgap/eV MTM/µB Reference[8] This work Up Down Total kag-CrPc 18.91 18.72 1.26 1.10 0.82 4 kag-MnPc 18.80 18.65 1.21 0.15 0.15 3.52 kag-CoPc 18.71 18.59 1.27 1.27 1.27 0.98 kag-CuPc 18.85 18.71 1.31 1.25 1.25 0.59 kag-ZnPc 19.03 18.82 — — 1.238 0 
DownLoad: CSV
表 2 四类kag-TMPc异质结的晶格失配度、平衡层间距、不能堆叠方式下的能量差(ΔEheter)、层间结合能(EB)和自旋极化的能带带隙
Table 2. Lattice mismatch, equilibrium distance, energy difference between two stacking modes, interlayer binding energy, and spin-polarized bandgap of kag-TMPc heterostructures.
Heterojunction Lattice
mismatchStacking
patternEquilibrium
distance/ÅΔEheter/eV $ {E}_{{\mathrm{B}}} $/meV Bandgap/eV Up Down Total kag-MnPc/MnPc 0.00% AA 3.705 0.172 –16 0.96 0.00 0.00 AB 3.452 –17 1.08 0.07 0.07 kag-MnPc/CuPc 0.32% AA 3.591 0.005 –18 0.94 0.10 0.10 AB 3.453 –18 1.10 0.16 0.16 kag-MnPc/ZnPc 0.88% AA 3.672 0.032 –17 0.94 0.16 0.16 AB 3.448 –17 1.08 0.17 0.17 kag-CoPc/CuPc 0.64% AA 3.617 0.189 –15 0.00 0.00 0.00 AB 3.454 –16 1.08 1.08 1.08
DownLoad: CSV
表 3 kag-TMPc异质结的磁交换能 (ΔE)和磁矩(M)
Table 3. Exchange energies per formula (ΔE) and magnetic moments (M) for kag-TMPc heterostructures.
Heterojunction Stacking pattern ΔE/meV Magnetic property Magnetic moment MA/µB MB/µB kag-MnPc/MnPc AB 7.1 FM 3.543/3.527/3.527 3.543/3.527/3.527 kag-MnPc/ZnPc AA 42.65 FM 3.568 0 AB 43.69 FM 3.557 0 kag-CoPc/CuPc AB 240 FiM 1.05/–1.05/–1.05 0.59/–0.59/–0.59
DownLoad: CSV
表 4 在不同层间距下AB堆叠kag-CoPc/CuPc异质结电子结构信息
Table 4. Electronic structure parameters of AB stacking kag-CoPc/CuPc heterostructures in different interlayer distance.
Interlayer distance/Å Bandgap/eV Band alignment Spin up Spin down Total Spin up Spin down 3.254 0.990 0.990 0.990 — II 3.354 0.610 0.490 0.050 I I 3.454 1.080 1.080 1.080 II II 3.554 1.130 1.070 1.060 II II 3.654 0.970 1.150 0.970 I II
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Lu S, Liu L B, Demissie H, An G Y, Wang D S 2021 Environ. Int. 146 106273
Google Scholar
[2] Wei X Q, Shao D, Xue C L, Qu X Y, Chai J, Li J Q, Du Y E, Chen Y Q 2020 CrystEngComm 22 5275
Google Scholar
[3] Thorarinsdottir A E, Harris T D 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 8716
Google Scholar
[4] Van Heumen E 2021 Nat. Mater. 20 1308
Google Scholar
[5] Yang Y X, Fan W H, Zhang Q H, Chen Z X, Chen X, Ying T P, Wu X X, Yang X F, Meng F Q, Li G, Li S Y, Gu L, Qian T, Schnyder A P, Guo J G, Chen X L 2021 Chin. Phys. Lett. 38 127102
Google Scholar
[6] Zeng K Y, Song F Y, Ling L S, Tong W, Li S L, Tian Z M, Ma L, Pi L 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 107501
Google Scholar
[7] Yang Y Y, Chen K W, Ding Z F, Hillier A D, Shu L 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 107502
Google Scholar
[8] Chen H Q, Shan H, Zhao A D, Li B 2019 Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 32 563
Google Scholar
[9] Kambe T, Sakamoto R, Hoshiko K, Takada K, Miyachi M, Ryu J H, Sasaki S, Kim J, Nakazato K, Takata M, Nishihara H 2013 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 2462
Google Scholar
[10] Wang Z F, Su N H, Liu F 2013 Nano Lett. 13 2842
Google Scholar
[11] Abel M, Clair S, Ourdjini O, Mossoyan M, Porte L 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 1203
Google Scholar
[12] Zhou J, Sun Q 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 15113
Google Scholar
[13] Xu Y N, Gu Z Q, Ching W Y 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 87 4867
Google Scholar
[14] Lü K, Zhou J, Zhou L, Wang Q, Sun Q, Jena P 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 163104
Google Scholar
[15] Xie L S, Jin G X, He L, Bauer G E W, Barker J, Xia K 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 014423
Google Scholar
[16] Ma Y D, Dai Y, Guo M, Niu C W, Huang B B 2011 Nanoscale 3 3883
Google Scholar
[17] Li X D, Yu S, Wu S Q, Wen Y H, Zhou S, Zhu Z Z 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 15347
Google Scholar
[18] Dean C R, Young A F, Meric I, Lee C, Wang L, Sorgenfrei S, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Kim P, Shepard K L, Hone J 2010 Nat. Nanotech. 5 722
Google Scholar
[19] Lin X, Xu Y, Hakro A A, Hasan T, Hao R, Zhang B, Chen H 2013 J. Mater. Chem. C 1 1618
Google Scholar
[20] Guo L J, Hu J S, Ma X G, Xiang J 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 097101
Google Scholar
[21] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169
Google Scholar
[22] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Comp. Mater. Sci. 6 15
Google Scholar
[23] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
Google Scholar
[24] Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953
Google Scholar
[25] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
Google Scholar
[26] Panchmatia P M, Sanyal B, Oppeneer P M 2008 Chemical Physics 343 47
Google Scholar
[27] Bernien M, Miguel J, Weis C, Ali Md E, Kurde J, Krumme B, Panchmatia P M, Sanyal B, Piantek M, Srivastava P, Baberschke K, Oppeneer P M, Eriksson O, Kuch W, Wende H 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 047202
Google Scholar
[28] Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 132 154104
Google Scholar
[29] Ningrum V P, Liu B, Wang W, Yin Y, Cao Y, Zha C, Xie H, Jiang X, Sun Y, Qin S, Chen X, Qin T, Zhu C, Wang L, Huang W 2020 Research 2020 1768918
Google Scholar
[30] Jiang X, Jiang Z, Zhao J J 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 253904
Google Scholar
[31] Yu J T, Jiang Z, Hao Y F, Zhu Q H, Zhao M L, Jiang X, Zhao J J 2018 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 30 25LT02
Google Scholar
[32] Deng Z X, Wang X H 2019 RSC Adv. 9 26024
Google Scholar
[33] Ben Aziza Z, Pierucci D, Henck H, Silly M G, David C, Yoon M, Sirotti F, Xiao K, Eddrief M, Girard J C, Ouerghi A 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 035407
Google Scholar
[34] Tongay S, Fan W, Kang J, Park J, Koldemir U, Suh J, Narang D S, Liu K, Ji J, Li J B, Sinclair R, Wu J Q 2014 Nano Lett. 14 3185
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 1170
- PDF Downloads: 117
- Cited By: 0
