Quasinormal mode analysis of extremely localized optical field in body-of-revolution plasmonic structures

Zhou Qiang; Lin Shu-Pei; Zhang Pu; Chen Xue-Wen

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20190434

Abstract

Surface plasmons in metallic nanostructures can confine the optical field within the region of subwavelength, even nanometer scale, and thus enhance the light-matter interaction and other physical processes, which will lead the plasmon optics to possess attractive applications in many areas. However, the " mode volume” often used to characterize field confinement in plasmonic structures is only defined phe-nomenologically and suffers ambiguity when applied to complex structures. In this work, we develop a theoretical method to characterize the field confinement based on quasi-normal mode analysis. We recognize the fact that a plasmonic resonance may result from many eigen-modes, which together contribute to the observed field confinement. An effective mode volume is introduced for quasi-normal modes and used to characterize the field confinement when the plasmonic resonance is dominated by a single quasi-normal mode. Two typical kinds of plasmonic structures are systematically examined, and the field confinement on the order of 10 nm³–100 nm³ is confirmed. In pursuit of the ultimate field confinement, we revisit the so-called " pico-cavity” formed by an atomistic protrusion in the nano gap of the particle-on-mirror configuration. The apparent hot spot is shown to have contributions from several quasi-normal modes. The dominant one exhibits a further squeezed mode volume compared with the scenario without the protrusion, but is still well above 10 nm³.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

School of Physics and Center for Quantum Optical Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Corresponding author: Zhang Pu, puzhang0702@hust.edu.cn ; Chen Xue-Wen, xuewen_chen@hust.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11874166) and the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11604109).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Alvarez Puebla R, Liz Marzán L M, García de Abajo F J 2010 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1 2428 Google Scholar
[2]	Kuznetsov A I, Miroshnichenko A E, Brongersma M L, Kivshar Y S, Luk’yanchuk B 2016 Science 354 aag2472 Google Scholar
[3]	Schuller J A, Barnard E S, Cai W, Jun Y C, White J S, Brongersma M L 2010 Nat. Mater. 9 193 Google Scholar
[4]	Polman A 2008 Science 322 868 Google Scholar
[5]	Benz F, Schmidt M K, Dreismann A, Chikkaraddy R, Zhang Y, Demetriadou A, Carnegie C, Ohadi H, de Nijs B, Esteban R, Aizpurua J, Baumberg J J 2016 Science 354 726 Google Scholar
[6]	Kern J, Großmann S, Tarakina N V, Hackel T, Emmerling M, Kamp M, Huang J S, Biagioni P, Prangsma J C, Hecht B 2012 Nano Lett. 12 5504 Google Scholar
[7]	Ciracì C, Hill R, Mock J, Urzhumov Y, Fernández Domínguez A, Maier S, Pendry J, Chilkoti A, Smith D 2012 Science 337 1072 Google Scholar
[8]	Wei H, Xu H 2013 Nanoscale 5 10794 Google Scholar
[9]	Oulton R F, Sorger V J, Genov D, Pile D, Zhang X 2008 Nat. Photon. 2 496 Google Scholar
[10]	Kleinman S L, Frontiera R R, Henry A I, Dieringer J A, van Duyne R P 2013 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 21 Google Scholar
[11]	Kneipp K, Wang Y, Kneipp H, Perelman L T, Itzkan I, Dasari R R, Feld M S 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 1667 Google Scholar
[12]	Stranahan S M, Willets K A 2010 Nano Lett. 10 3777 Google Scholar
[13]	Willets K A, Wilson A J, Sundaresan V, Joshi P B 2017 Chem. Rev. 117 7538 Google Scholar
[14]	Chen W, Zhang S, Deng Q, Xu H 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 801 Google Scholar
[15]	Loo C, Lowery A, Halas N, West J, Drezek R 2005 Nano Lett. 5 709 Google Scholar
[16]	Huang X, Jain P K, Sayed I H E, Sayed M A E 2007 Nanomedicine 2 681 Google Scholar
[17]	Juan M L, Righini M, Quidant R 2011 Nat. Photon. 5 349 Google Scholar
[18]	Maragò O M, Jones P H, Gucciardi P G, Volpe G, Ferrari A C 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 807 Google Scholar
[19]	Pelton M 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 427 Google Scholar
[20]	Tame M S, McEnery K R, Özdemir Ş K, Lee J, Maier S A, Kim M S 2013 Nat. Phys. 9 329 Google Scholar
[21]	Reiserer A, Rempe G 2015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 1379 Google Scholar
[22]	Wen J, Wang H, Chen H, Deng S, Xu N 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 096101 Google Scholar
[23]	Maier S A 2006 Opt. Express 14 1957 Google Scholar
[24]	Koenderink A F 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 4208 Google Scholar
[25]	Esteban R, Aizpurua J, Bryant G W 2014 New J. Phys. 16 013052 Google Scholar
[26]	Muljarov E, Langbein W 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 235438 Google Scholar
[27]	Sauvan C, Hugonin J P, Maksymov I S, Lalanne P 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 237401 Google Scholar
[28]	Leung P, Liu S, Young K 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49 3057 Google Scholar
[29]	Lalanne P, Yan W, Vynck K, Sauvan C, Hugonin J P 2018 Laser Photon. Rev. 12 1700113 Google Scholar
[30]	Yan W, Faggiani R, Lalanne P 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 205422 Google Scholar
[31]	Muljarov E, Weiss T 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 1978 Google Scholar
[32]	Franke S, Hughes S, Dezfouli M K, Kristensen P T, Busch K, Knorr A, Richter M 2018 arXiv: 1808.06392
[33]	Hughes S, Richter M, Knorr A 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 1834 Google Scholar
[34]	Novotny L, Hecht B 2012 Principles of Nano-Optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp350–359
[35]	Dung H T, Knöll L, Welsch D G 1998 Phys. Rev. A 57 3931 Google Scholar
[36]	Lalanne P, Yan W, Gras A, Sauvan C, Hugonin J P, Besbes M, Demésy G, Truong M, Gralak B, Zolla F 2018 arXiv: 1811.11751
[37]	Muljarov E, Langbein W 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 075417 Google Scholar
[38]	Bai Q, Perrin M, Sauvan C, Hugonin J P, Lalanne P 2013 Opt. Express 21 27371 Google Scholar
[39]	Dezfouli M K, Hughes S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 115302 Google Scholar
[40]	Dezfouli M K, Tserkezis C, Mortensen N A, Hughes S 2017 Optica 4 1503 Google Scholar
[41]	Raman A, Fan S 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 087401 Google Scholar
[42]	Demésy G, Nicolet A, Gralak B, Geuzaine C, Campos C, Roman J E 2018 arXiv: 1802.02363
[43]	Tisseur F, Meerbergen K 2001 SIAM Rev. 43 235 Google Scholar
[44]	Taflove A, Hagness S C 2005 Computational Electrodynamics: the Fnite-Difference Time-Domain Method (Norwood: Artech House) pp517–552
[45]	Oxborrow M 2007 IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 55 1209 Google Scholar
[46]	Chinellato O, Arbenz P, Streiff M, Witzig A 2005 Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 21 1263 Google Scholar
[47]	Jin J 2014 The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics (Hoboken: Wiley-IEEE Press) pp315–371
[48]	Ho K, Leung P, van Den Brink A M, Young K 1998 Phys. Rev. E 58 2965 Google Scholar
[49]	Ge R C, Kristensen P T, Young J F, Hughes S 2014 New J. Phys. 16 113048 Google Scholar
[50]	Kristensen P T, Hughes S 2013 ACS Photon. 1 2
[51]	Iranzo D A, Nanot S, Dias E J, Epstein I, Peng C, Efetov D K, Lundeberg M B, Parret R, Osmond J, Hong J Y 2018 Science 360 291 Google Scholar
[52]	Amendola V, Pilot R, Frasconi M, Marago O M, Iati M A 2017 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29 203002 Google Scholar
[53]	Baranov D G, Wersall M, Cuadra J, Antosiewicz T J, Shegai T 2017 ACS Photon. 5 24
[54]	Prodan E, Radloff C, Halas N J, Nordlander P 2003 Science 302 419 Google Scholar
[55]	Urbieta M, Barbry M, Zhang Y, Koval P, Sánchez Portal D, Zabala N, Aizpurua J 2018 ACS Nano 12 585 Google Scholar
[56]	Ciracì C 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 245434 Google Scholar
[57]	Savage K J, Hawkeye M M, Esteban R, Borisov A G, Aizpurua J, Baumberg J J 2012 Nature 491 574 Google Scholar
[58]	Esteban R, Borisov A G, Nordlander P, Aizpurua J 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 825 Google Scholar
[59]	Chikkaraddy R, de Nijs B, Benz F, Barrow S J, Scherman O A, Rosta E, Demetriadou A, Fox P, Hess O, Baumberg J J 2016 Nature 535 127 Google Scholar
[60]	Barbry M, Koval P, Marchesin F, Esteban R, Borisov A G, Aizpurua J, Sánchez Portal D 2015 Nano Lett. 15 3410 Google Scholar
[61]	Trautmann S, Aizpurua J, Götz I, Undisz A, Dellith J, Schneidewind H, Rettenmayr M, Deckert V 2017 Nanoscale 9 391 Google Scholar
[62]	Weaver J, Frederikse H 1977 CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Boca Raton: CRC Press) pp12–156
[63]	Bohren C F, Huffman D R 2008 Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons) pp82–129

Cited By

图 1 半径40 nm金球的准正则模式分析　(a)旋转对称结构建模示意; (b)按指标l, m排列的归一化准正则模场分布, 中心线左右两侧分别为E_r和E_θ的实部; (c)准正则模式谱分布, 蓝色叉为模式聚点; (d)用全波仿真(full wave)、解析公式(analytical)和准正则模式重建(QNM)三种方法得到的距金纳米球表面10 nm处沿轴向的Purcell因子

Figure 1. 2D axisymmetric quasinormal mode (QNM) analysis for a spherical gold nanoparticle with r_s = 40 nm: (a) Schematic of 2D axisymmetric modeling; (b) shows a table of normalized QNM profiles arranged according to indices l and m, where on the left and right side of the axis shows the real part of E_r and E_θ, respectively; (c) spectral distribution of QNMs with an accumulation point indicated by the blue cross; (d) at a position 10 nm away from the metal surface, Purcell factor in radial direction is calculated with full wave simulation, analytical methods and QNM reconstruction.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 二聚体结构准正则模式及场局域分析　二聚体由r_a = 40 nm和r_b = 5, 20, 40 nm的两个金纳米球组成, 间隙宽度d = 1, 5, 10 nm; 图中展示了: 准正则模式谱分布; 纳米间隙中心处轴向Purcell因子的准正则模式重建(黑色实线), 红色圆圈为全波仿真结果; 纳米间隙附近BDP模式的等效模体积分布

Figure 2. QNM modal analysis for dimers and the field localization of the BDP modes. The dimers consist of two spherical gold nanoparticles with r_a = 40 nm and r_b = 5, 20, 40 nm. The gap size d = 1, 5, 10 nm. In the figure are illustrated: the spectral distributions of the QNMs; the QNM reconstruction (black solid lines) of the Purcell factor at the gap center and in the axial direction, the full wave simulation results are indicated by red circles; the mode volume profiles of the BDP modes in the gap region.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 PoM的准正则模式及场局域分析　PoM中金颗粒为半长轴a = 40 nm的旋转椭球, 镜面为相同材料无穷大半空间, 椭球半短轴b = 5, 20, 40 nm, 与镜面间距d = 1, 5, 10 nm; 图中展示了: 准正则模式谱分布; 纳米间隙中心处轴向Purcell因子的准正则模式重建(黑色实线), 红色圆圈为全波仿真结果; 纳米间隙附近BDP模式的等效模体积分布

Figure 3. QNM modal analysis for particle-on-mirror (PoM) structures and the field localization of the BDP modes. The gold particles are ellipsoids of revolution with semi-axes a = 40 nm and b = 5, 20, 40 nm. The gap formed with gold mirrors has d = 1, 5, 10 nm. In the figure are illustrated: the spectral distributions of the QNMs; the QNM reconstruction (black solid lines) of the Purcell factor at the gap center and in the axial direction, the full wave simulation results are indicated by red circles; the mode volume profiles of the BDP modes in the gap region.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 PoM纳米间隙中原子凸起结构对光场局域的影响和准正则模式分析　(a) 存在与不存在原子凸起时的结构示意图; (b) 纳米间隙中心高度位置的局域场增强效应, 激励源为镜面上方716 nm处轴向偶极子; (c) BQP谐振波长处纳米间隙中心高度的局域场增强效应; (d) PoM结构的准正则模式谱分布以及纳米间隙中心处轴向Purcell因子的准正则模式重建; (e) BQP模式的归一化模场和等效模式体积

Figure 4. The effects of the atomistic protrusion on the field localization in the nano-gap of the particle-on-mirror (PoM) structure and the QNM modal analysis: (a) Schematic diagrams of the PoM structures with and without the atomistic protrusion; (b) the local field enhancement at the half height in the gap when excited by an axially polarized dipole 716 nm above the mirror; (c) the cross section of the local field enhancement in (b) at the resonance wavelength of the BQP mode; (d) the spectral distributions of the QNMs and the QNM reconstruction of the Purcell factor at the gap center and in the axial direction; (e) the normalized modal profile of the BQP mode and its mode volume map in the gap region.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Alvarez Puebla R, Liz Marzán L M, García de Abajo F J 2010 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1 2428 Google Scholar
[2]	Kuznetsov A I, Miroshnichenko A E, Brongersma M L, Kivshar Y S, Luk’yanchuk B 2016 Science 354 aag2472 Google Scholar
[3]	Schuller J A, Barnard E S, Cai W, Jun Y C, White J S, Brongersma M L 2010 Nat. Mater. 9 193 Google Scholar
[4]	Polman A 2008 Science 322 868 Google Scholar
[5]	Benz F, Schmidt M K, Dreismann A, Chikkaraddy R, Zhang Y, Demetriadou A, Carnegie C, Ohadi H, de Nijs B, Esteban R, Aizpurua J, Baumberg J J 2016 Science 354 726 Google Scholar
[6]	Kern J, Großmann S, Tarakina N V, Hackel T, Emmerling M, Kamp M, Huang J S, Biagioni P, Prangsma J C, Hecht B 2012 Nano Lett. 12 5504 Google Scholar
[7]	Ciracì C, Hill R, Mock J, Urzhumov Y, Fernández Domínguez A, Maier S, Pendry J, Chilkoti A, Smith D 2012 Science 337 1072 Google Scholar
[8]	Wei H, Xu H 2013 Nanoscale 5 10794 Google Scholar
[9]	Oulton R F, Sorger V J, Genov D, Pile D, Zhang X 2008 Nat. Photon. 2 496 Google Scholar
[10]	Kleinman S L, Frontiera R R, Henry A I, Dieringer J A, van Duyne R P 2013 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 21 Google Scholar
[11]	Kneipp K, Wang Y, Kneipp H, Perelman L T, Itzkan I, Dasari R R, Feld M S 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 1667 Google Scholar
[12]	Stranahan S M, Willets K A 2010 Nano Lett. 10 3777 Google Scholar
[13]	Willets K A, Wilson A J, Sundaresan V, Joshi P B 2017 Chem. Rev. 117 7538 Google Scholar
[14]	Chen W, Zhang S, Deng Q, Xu H 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 801 Google Scholar
[15]	Loo C, Lowery A, Halas N, West J, Drezek R 2005 Nano Lett. 5 709 Google Scholar
[16]	Huang X, Jain P K, Sayed I H E, Sayed M A E 2007 Nanomedicine 2 681 Google Scholar
[17]	Juan M L, Righini M, Quidant R 2011 Nat. Photon. 5 349 Google Scholar
[18]	Maragò O M, Jones P H, Gucciardi P G, Volpe G, Ferrari A C 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 807 Google Scholar
[19]	Pelton M 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 427 Google Scholar
[20]	Tame M S, McEnery K R, Özdemir Ş K, Lee J, Maier S A, Kim M S 2013 Nat. Phys. 9 329 Google Scholar
[21]	Reiserer A, Rempe G 2015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 1379 Google Scholar
[22]	Wen J, Wang H, Chen H, Deng S, Xu N 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 096101 Google Scholar
[23]	Maier S A 2006 Opt. Express 14 1957 Google Scholar
[24]	Koenderink A F 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 4208 Google Scholar
[25]	Esteban R, Aizpurua J, Bryant G W 2014 New J. Phys. 16 013052 Google Scholar
[26]	Muljarov E, Langbein W 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 235438 Google Scholar
[27]	Sauvan C, Hugonin J P, Maksymov I S, Lalanne P 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 237401 Google Scholar
[28]	Leung P, Liu S, Young K 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49 3057 Google Scholar
[29]	Lalanne P, Yan W, Vynck K, Sauvan C, Hugonin J P 2018 Laser Photon. Rev. 12 1700113 Google Scholar
[30]	Yan W, Faggiani R, Lalanne P 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 205422 Google Scholar
[31]	Muljarov E, Weiss T 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 1978 Google Scholar
[32]	Franke S, Hughes S, Dezfouli M K, Kristensen P T, Busch K, Knorr A, Richter M 2018 arXiv: 1808.06392
[33]	Hughes S, Richter M, Knorr A 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 1834 Google Scholar
[34]	Novotny L, Hecht B 2012 Principles of Nano-Optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp350–359
[35]	Dung H T, Knöll L, Welsch D G 1998 Phys. Rev. A 57 3931 Google Scholar
[36]	Lalanne P, Yan W, Gras A, Sauvan C, Hugonin J P, Besbes M, Demésy G, Truong M, Gralak B, Zolla F 2018 arXiv: 1811.11751
[37]	Muljarov E, Langbein W 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 075417 Google Scholar
[38]	Bai Q, Perrin M, Sauvan C, Hugonin J P, Lalanne P 2013 Opt. Express 21 27371 Google Scholar
[39]	Dezfouli M K, Hughes S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 115302 Google Scholar
[40]	Dezfouli M K, Tserkezis C, Mortensen N A, Hughes S 2017 Optica 4 1503 Google Scholar
[41]	Raman A, Fan S 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 087401 Google Scholar
[42]	Demésy G, Nicolet A, Gralak B, Geuzaine C, Campos C, Roman J E 2018 arXiv: 1802.02363
[43]	Tisseur F, Meerbergen K 2001 SIAM Rev. 43 235 Google Scholar
[44]	Taflove A, Hagness S C 2005 Computational Electrodynamics: the Fnite-Difference Time-Domain Method (Norwood: Artech House) pp517–552
[45]	Oxborrow M 2007 IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 55 1209 Google Scholar
[46]	Chinellato O, Arbenz P, Streiff M, Witzig A 2005 Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 21 1263 Google Scholar
[47]	Jin J 2014 The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics (Hoboken: Wiley-IEEE Press) pp315–371
[48]	Ho K, Leung P, van Den Brink A M, Young K 1998 Phys. Rev. E 58 2965 Google Scholar
[49]	Ge R C, Kristensen P T, Young J F, Hughes S 2014 New J. Phys. 16 113048 Google Scholar
[50]	Kristensen P T, Hughes S 2013 ACS Photon. 1 2
[51]	Iranzo D A, Nanot S, Dias E J, Epstein I, Peng C, Efetov D K, Lundeberg M B, Parret R, Osmond J, Hong J Y 2018 Science 360 291 Google Scholar
[52]	Amendola V, Pilot R, Frasconi M, Marago O M, Iati M A 2017 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29 203002 Google Scholar
[53]	Baranov D G, Wersall M, Cuadra J, Antosiewicz T J, Shegai T 2017 ACS Photon. 5 24
[54]	Prodan E, Radloff C, Halas N J, Nordlander P 2003 Science 302 419 Google Scholar
[55]	Urbieta M, Barbry M, Zhang Y, Koval P, Sánchez Portal D, Zabala N, Aizpurua J 2018 ACS Nano 12 585 Google Scholar
[56]	Ciracì C 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 245434 Google Scholar
[57]	Savage K J, Hawkeye M M, Esteban R, Borisov A G, Aizpurua J, Baumberg J J 2012 Nature 491 574 Google Scholar
[58]	Esteban R, Borisov A G, Nordlander P, Aizpurua J 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 825 Google Scholar
[59]	Chikkaraddy R, de Nijs B, Benz F, Barrow S J, Scherman O A, Rosta E, Demetriadou A, Fox P, Hess O, Baumberg J J 2016 Nature 535 127 Google Scholar
[60]	Barbry M, Koval P, Marchesin F, Esteban R, Borisov A G, Aizpurua J, Sánchez Portal D 2015 Nano Lett. 15 3410 Google Scholar
[61]	Trautmann S, Aizpurua J, Götz I, Undisz A, Dellith J, Schneidewind H, Rettenmayr M, Deckert V 2017 Nanoscale 9 391 Google Scholar
[62]	Weaver J, Frederikse H 1977 CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Boca Raton: CRC Press) pp12–156
[63]	Bohren C F, Huffman D R 2008 Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons) pp82–129

[1]	Yin Cheng, Lu Cheng-Jie, Da Jing, Zhang Rui-Geng, Kan Xue-Fen, Han Qing-Bang, Xu Tian. Extinction cross section of dimer array of metallic nanoparticles. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(2): 024201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20200964
[2]	Wu Han, Wu Jing-Yu, Chen Zhuo. Strong coupling between metasurface based Tamm plasmon microcavity and exciton. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(1): 010201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191225
[3]	Zhang Duo-Duo, Liu Xiao-Feng, Qiu Jian-Rong. Ultrafast optical switches and pulse lasers based on strong nonlinear optical response of plasmon nanostructures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(18): 189101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200456
[4]	Liu Zi, Zhang Heng, Wu Hao, Liu Chang. Enhancement of photoluminescence from zinc oxide by aluminum nanoparticle surface plasmon. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(10): 107301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190062
[5]	Yu Hua-Kang, Liu Bo-Dong, Wu Wan-Ling, Li Zhi-Yuan. Surface plasmaons enhanced light-matter interactions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(14): 149101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190337
[6]	Wu Li-Xiang, Li Xin, Yang Yuan-Jie. Generation of surface plasmon vortices based on double-layer Archimedes spirals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(23): 234201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190747
[7]	Zhang Bao-Bao, Zhang Cheng-Yun, Zhang Zheng-Long, Zheng Hai-Rong. Surface plasmon mediated chemical reaction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(14): 147102. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190345
[8]	Li Pan. Research progress of plasmonic nanofocusing. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(14): 146201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190564
[9]	Zhang Wen-Jun, Gao Long, Wei Hong, Xu Hong-Xing. Modulation of propagating surface plasmons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(14): 147302. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190802
[10]	Wang Han-Cong, Li Zhi-Peng. Advances in surface-enhanced optical forces and optical manipulations. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(14): 144101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190606
[11]	Chen Lu, Chen Yue-Gang. Surface plasmon polaritons’ propagation controlled by metal-photorefractive material composite holographical structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(6): 067101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181664
[12]	Wang Wen-Hui, Zhang Nao. Energy loss of surface plasmon polaritons on Ag nanowire waveguide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(24): 247302. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20182085
[13]	Li Xue, Wang Liang, Xiong Jian-Qiao, Shao Qiu-Ping, Jiang Rong, Chen Shu-Fen. Enhanced light absorption and device performances of organic photovoltaic devices with Au tetrahedra nanoparticles. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(24): 247201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181502
[14]	Wang Dong, Xu Jun, Chen Yi-Hang. Broadband absorption caused by coupling of epsilon-near-zero mode with plasmon mode. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(20): 207301. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181106
[15]	Deng Hong-Mei, Huang Lei, Li Jing, Lu Ye, Li Chuan-Qi. Tunable unidirectional surface plasmon polariton coupler utilizing graphene-based asymmetric nanoantenna pairs. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(14): 145201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.145201
[16]	Huang Zhi-Fang, Ni Ya-Xian, Sun Hua. Localized surface plasmon resonance and the size effects of magneto-optic rods. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(11): 114202. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.114202
[17]	Chen Zhao-Quan, Xia Guang-Qing, Liu Ming-Hai, Zheng Xiao-Liang, Hu Ye-Lin, Li Ping, Xu Gong-Lin, Hong Ling-Li, Shen Hao-Yu, Hu Xi-Wei. PIC/MCC simulation of the ionization process of SWP influenced by gas pressure and SPP. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(19): 195204. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.195204
[18]	Zhu Hua, Yan Zhen-Dong, Zhan Peng, Wang Zhen-Lin. Enhanced third harmonic generation by localized surface plasmon excitation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(17): 178104. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.178104
[19]	Dong Tai-Yuan, Ye Kun-Tao, Liu Wei-Qing. The current status of surface wave plasma source development. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(14): 145202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.145202
[20]	Han Qing-Yao, Tang Jun-Chao, Zhang Chao, Wang Chuan, Ma Hai-Qiang, Yu Li, Jiao Rong-Zhen. The effects of local density of states on surface plasmon polaritons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(13): 135202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.135202

Catalog

Vol. 68, Issue 14 - 2019-07-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 10658
PDF Downloads: 242
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板