高能脉冲C6+离子束激发Ni靶的K壳层X射线

梅策香; 张小安; 周贤明; 赵永涛; 任洁茹; 王兴; 雷瑜; 孙渊博; 程锐; 徐戈; 曾利霞

doi:10.7498/aps.66.143401

摘要

精确测量离子与原子碰撞引起的靶原子内壳层电离截面，对研究原子内壳层过程以及建立合适的理论模型具有重要的意义.现有的实验数据和理论模型大都集中在中低能区，高能区由于受到实验条件的限制，几乎没有相关实验数据的报道，哪种理论更适合描述高能重离子入射的靶原子内壳层电离截面，还需要进行深入的实验研究.采用电子冷却存储环提供能量分别为165，300，350，430 MeV/u的C6+离子束轰击Ni靶，测量Ni的K壳层X射线.分析了实验中探测到的Ni的K和K射线强度比，发现入射粒子能量的变化对该强度比影响不明显.分别应用两体碰撞近似（BEA）、平面波玻恩近似（PWBA）和ECPSSR理论对Ni的K壳层X射线的产生截面进行理论计算，并将理论结果与实验结果进行比较.

关键词:

X射线 /
产生截面 /
高能脉冲束

Abstract

Accurate measurement of the ionization cross section of the target atom induced by collision between ions and atoms is of great significance for studying the atomic shell process and establishing a suitable theoretical model. The experimental data and the theoretical models mostly concentrate on the cases in the low energy region at present. Only a few experimental data of high energy region are reported due to the limitation of experimental conditions. Which theory is more suitable to describe the ionization cross section of the inner shell of the target atom caused by the high energy heavy ions, is necessarily studied experimentally. The C6+ ions provided by the Heavy Ion Research Facility in Lanzhou Electron Cooling Storage Ring, are used to bombard the Ni target, in which the K-shell X-ray of Ni is measured. The incident energies of C6+ ions are 165, 300, 350 and 430 MeV/u respectively. Through analyzing the intensity ratio of K/K X-ray of Ni, it is found that the influence of incident energy on the intensity ratio of K/K X-ray is not obvious. The intensity ratios of this experiment are greater than the experimental values of incident proton and the calculated values based on the Hartree-Slater theory, which may be caused by the multiple-ionization of the L shell. The production cross sections of Ni K-shell X-ray are calculated by the binary encounter approximation (BEA) model, the plane wave Born approximation (PWBA) model and the energy-loss coulomb-repulsion perturbed-stationary-state relativistic (ECPSSR) theory respectively, which are compared with the experimental results in this paper. It is found that the experimental cross section increases with the increasing incident energy, which is consistent with the trend of BEA model estimation, but the experimental value is obviously lower than the theoretical value. We think that BEA model needs to be modified when describing the ionization process in the high energy region.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
咸阳师范学院与中国科学院近代物理研究所联合共建离子束与光物理实验室, 咸阳 712000;

2.
西安交通大学理学院, 西安 710049;

3.
中国科学院近代物理研究所, 兰州 730000

通信作者: 张小安, zhangxiaoan2000@126.com

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（批准号：11605147，11505248）和陕西省教育厅科研计划（批准号：15JK1793）资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
Ion beam & Optical Physical Joint Laboratory of Xianyang Normal University and Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xianyang 712000, China;

2.
School of Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China;

3.
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China

Corresponding author: Zhang Xiao-An, zhangxiaoan2000@126.com

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11605147, 11505248) and the Scientific Research Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department, China (Grant No. 15JK1793).

参考文献

[1]	Dennerl K, Englhauser J, Trmper J 1997 Science 277 1625
[2]	Hu Z M, Han X Y, Li Y M, Kato D J, Tong X M, Nakamura N 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 073002
[3]	Zhou X M, Zhao Y T, Cheng R, Lei Y, Wang Y Y, Ren J R, Liu S D, Mei C X, Chen X M, Xiao G Q 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 027901 (in Chinese) [周贤明, 赵永涛, 程锐, 雷瑜, 王瑜玉, 任洁茹, 刘世东, 梅策香, 陈熙萌, 肖国青 2016 物理学报 65 027901]
[4]	Lapicki G, Murty G A V R, Raju G J N, Reddy B S, Reddy S B, Vijayan V 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 062718
[5]	Wang X, Zhao Y T, Chen R, Zhou X M, Xu G, Sun Y B, Lei Y, Wang Y Y, Ren J R, Yu Y, Li Y F, Zhang X A, Li Y Z, Liang C H, Xiao G Q 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 1197
[6]	Liang C H, Zhang X A, Li Y Z, Zhao Y T, Mei C X, Zhou X M, Xiao G Q 2013 Acta. Phys. Sin. 62 063202 (in Chinese) [梁昌慧, 张小安, 李耀宗, 赵永涛, 梅策香, 周贤明, 肖国青 2013 物理学报 62 063202]
[7]	Mei C X, Zhao Y T, Zhang X A, Ren J R, Zhou X M, Wang X, Lei Y, Liang C H, Li Y Z, Xiao G Q 2012 Laser Part. Beams 30 665
[8]	Merzbacher E, Lewis H W 1958 Handbuch der Physik 6 166
[9]	Lapicki G, Laubert R, Brandt W 1980 Phys. Rev. A 22 1889
[10]	Brandt W, Lapicki G 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23 1717
[11]	Lapicki G, Zander A R 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23 2072
[12]	Lapicki G 2002 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 19 8
[13]	Kocbach L, Hansteen J M, Gundersen R 1980 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 169 281
[14]	McGuire J H, Richard P 1973 Phys. Rev. A 8 1374
[15]	Fano U, Lichten W 1965 Phys. Rev. Lett 14 627
[16]	Kessler J E G, Deslatts R D, Girard D, Schwitz W, Jacobs L, Renner O 1982 Phys. Rev. A 26 2696
[17]	Thompson A C, Kirz J, Attwood D T, Gullikson E M, Howells M R, Kortright J B, Robinson A L, Underwood J M 2009 X-ray Data Booklet (3rd Ed.)
[18]	Scofield J H 1974 Phys. Rev. A 9 1041
[19]	Slabkowska K, Polasik M 2003 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 205 123
[20]	Zhou X M, Cheng R, Lei Y, Sun Y B, Wang Y Y, Wang X, Xu G, Mei C X, Zhang X A, Chen X M, Xiao G Q, Zhao Y T 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 023402
[21]	Gryzinski M 1965 Phys. Rev. A 138 336
[22]	Liu Z, Cipolla S J 1996 Comp. Phys. Comm. 97 315
[23]	Benka O, Kropf A 1978 Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 22 219
[24]	Krause M O 1979 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. 8 307
[25]	Tawara H, Richard P, Gray T J, Newcomb J, Jamison K A, Schmiedekamp C, Hall J M 1978 Phys. Rev. A 18 1373
[26]	Czarnota M, Banaś D, Braziewicz J, Semaniak J, Pajek M 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 032710

施引文献

[1]	Dennerl K, Englhauser J, Trmper J 1997 Science 277 1625
[2]	Hu Z M, Han X Y, Li Y M, Kato D J, Tong X M, Nakamura N 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 073002
[3]	Zhou X M, Zhao Y T, Cheng R, Lei Y, Wang Y Y, Ren J R, Liu S D, Mei C X, Chen X M, Xiao G Q 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 027901 (in Chinese) [周贤明, 赵永涛, 程锐, 雷瑜, 王瑜玉, 任洁茹, 刘世东, 梅策香, 陈熙萌, 肖国青 2016 物理学报 65 027901]
[4]	Lapicki G, Murty G A V R, Raju G J N, Reddy B S, Reddy S B, Vijayan V 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 062718
[5]	Wang X, Zhao Y T, Chen R, Zhou X M, Xu G, Sun Y B, Lei Y, Wang Y Y, Ren J R, Yu Y, Li Y F, Zhang X A, Li Y Z, Liang C H, Xiao G Q 2012 Phys. Lett. A 376 1197
[6]	Liang C H, Zhang X A, Li Y Z, Zhao Y T, Mei C X, Zhou X M, Xiao G Q 2013 Acta. Phys. Sin. 62 063202 (in Chinese) [梁昌慧, 张小安, 李耀宗, 赵永涛, 梅策香, 周贤明, 肖国青 2013 物理学报 62 063202]
[7]	Mei C X, Zhao Y T, Zhang X A, Ren J R, Zhou X M, Wang X, Lei Y, Liang C H, Li Y Z, Xiao G Q 2012 Laser Part. Beams 30 665
[8]	Merzbacher E, Lewis H W 1958 Handbuch der Physik 6 166
[9]	Lapicki G, Laubert R, Brandt W 1980 Phys. Rev. A 22 1889
[10]	Brandt W, Lapicki G 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23 1717
[11]	Lapicki G, Zander A R 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23 2072
[12]	Lapicki G 2002 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 19 8
[13]	Kocbach L, Hansteen J M, Gundersen R 1980 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 169 281
[14]	McGuire J H, Richard P 1973 Phys. Rev. A 8 1374
[15]	Fano U, Lichten W 1965 Phys. Rev. Lett 14 627
[16]	Kessler J E G, Deslatts R D, Girard D, Schwitz W, Jacobs L, Renner O 1982 Phys. Rev. A 26 2696
[17]	Thompson A C, Kirz J, Attwood D T, Gullikson E M, Howells M R, Kortright J B, Robinson A L, Underwood J M 2009 X-ray Data Booklet (3rd Ed.)
[18]	Scofield J H 1974 Phys. Rev. A 9 1041
[19]	Slabkowska K, Polasik M 2003 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 205 123
[20]	Zhou X M, Cheng R, Lei Y, Sun Y B, Wang Y Y, Wang X, Xu G, Mei C X, Zhang X A, Chen X M, Xiao G Q, Zhao Y T 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 023402
[21]	Gryzinski M 1965 Phys. Rev. A 138 336
[22]	Liu Z, Cipolla S J 1996 Comp. Phys. Comm. 97 315
[23]	Benka O, Kropf A 1978 Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 22 219
[24]	Krause M O 1979 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. 8 307
[25]	Tawara H, Richard P, Gray T J, Newcomb J, Jamison K A, Schmiedekamp C, Hall J M 1978 Phys. Rev. A 18 1373
[26]	Czarnota M, Banaś D, Braziewicz J, Semaniak J, Pajek M 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 032710

计量

文章访问数: 4590
PDF下载量: 142
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板