单开口膜泡形状转变的研究

梁月凤; 张劭光

doi:10.7498/aps.66.158701

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名

邮箱

手机号码

标题

留言内容

验证码

摘要

基于双层耦合模型，先通过求解无黏附能情况下满足给定边界条件的欧拉-拉格朗日方程组，找到了约化面积差a稍大于1的内凹开口形状解，并发现以往Umeda和Suezaki（2005 Phys.Rev.E 71 011913）给出的杯形解是对应a1的另一支解，该支解在a趋于1时开口是外凸的.进而在无黏附能和有黏附能的情况下对开口膜泡的两支解进行了深入研究，发现在a=1附近这两支解之间有一个间隙，在该间隙内不存在开口解.随着黏附半径的增大，该间隙的位置较缓慢地向右移动.在a=1附近，在无黏附能时的闭合形状只有球形一个解，而在有黏附能的情况下，闭合形状在1附近的一个区间内都有解.在无黏附及有黏附情况下的计算结果都表明这两支开口解及闭合形状属于不同的分支，它们之间不能连续演化.在间隙右侧的这一支解随着a的增大可以通过自交形状连续地演化到开口哑铃形.在有黏附的情况下，在a参数空间，同一支解会发生折叠，即出现同一a值对应多个解（形状）的情况，这在以往双层耦合模型的计算中没有出现过.讨论了a对无黏附和有黏附开口膜泡的形状和能量的影响.

关键词:

作者及机构信息

1.
陕西师范大学物理学与信息技术学院, 西安 710119

通信作者: 张劭光, zhangsg@snnu.edu.cn

基金项目: 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（批准号：GK201302011）和国家自然科学基金（批准号：10374063）资助的课题.

参考文献

[1]	Seifert U 1997 Adv. Phys. 46 13
[2]	Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson J D 1983 Molecular Biology of the Cell (New York: Garlan Publishing) pp112-115
[3]	Sternberg B, Grumpert J, Reinhardt G, Gawrisch K 1987 Biochim. Biophys. Acta 898 223
[4]	Bernard A L, Guedeau-Boudeville M A, Jullien L, Meglio J M D 2000 Langmuir 16 6809
[5]	Sackmann E 1996 Science 271 43
[6]	Keller C A, Glasmstar K, Zhdanov V P, Kasemo B 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5443
[7]	Seifert U, Lipowsky R 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42 4768
[8]	Capovilla R, Guven J 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 041604
[9]	Tordeux C, Fournier J B 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 041912
[10]	Rosso R, Virga E G 1999 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 455 4145
[11]	Das S, Du Q 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 011907
[12]	Saitoh A, Takiguchi K, Tanaka Y, Hotani H 1998 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 1026
[13]	Capovilla R, Guven J, Santiago J A 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 021607
[14]	Tu Z C, Ouyang Z C 2003 Phys. Rev. E 68 061915
[15]	Umeda T, Suezaki Y 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 011913
[16]	Kang W B, Zhang S G, Wang Y, Mu Y R, Huang C 2011 Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 54 2243
[17]	Huang C, Zhang S G 2013 J. Shaanxi Normal Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 41 31 (in Chinese) [黄聪, 张劭光 2013 陕西师范大学学报 41 31]
[18]	Kong X B, Zhang S G 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 068701 (in Chinese) [孔祥波, 张劭光 2016 物理学报 65 068701]
[19]	Ni D, Shi H J, Yin Y J 2005 Colloids Surf. B 46 162
[20]	L C J, Yin Y J, Yin J 2009 Colloids Surf. B 74 380
[21]	Canham P B 1970 J. Theoret. Biol. 26 61
[22]	Helfrich W 1973 Z. Naturforsch. C 28 693
[23]	Svetina S, Ottova-Lietmannova A, Glaser R 1982 J. Theor. Biol. 94 13
[24]	Svetina S, Zeks B 1985 Biomed. Biochim. Acta 44 979
[25]	Ouyang Z C, Helfrich W 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 2486
[26]	Ouyang Z C, Helfrich W 1989 Phys. Rev. A 39 5280
[27]	Miao L, Seifert U, Wortis M, Dbereiner H G 1994 Phys. Rev. E 49 5389
[28]	Seifert U, Berndl K, Lipowsky R 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 1182
[29]	Jlicher F, Lipowsky R 1996 Phys. Rev. E 53 2670
[30]	Yang P, Du Q, Tu Z C 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 042403

施引文献

[1]	Seifert U 1997 Adv. Phys. 46 13
[2]	Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson J D 1983 Molecular Biology of the Cell (New York: Garlan Publishing) pp112-115
[3]	Sternberg B, Grumpert J, Reinhardt G, Gawrisch K 1987 Biochim. Biophys. Acta 898 223
[4]	Bernard A L, Guedeau-Boudeville M A, Jullien L, Meglio J M D 2000 Langmuir 16 6809
[5]	Sackmann E 1996 Science 271 43
[6]	Keller C A, Glasmstar K, Zhdanov V P, Kasemo B 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5443
[7]	Seifert U, Lipowsky R 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42 4768
[8]	Capovilla R, Guven J 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 041604
[9]	Tordeux C, Fournier J B 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 041912
[10]	Rosso R, Virga E G 1999 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 455 4145
[11]	Das S, Du Q 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 011907
[12]	Saitoh A, Takiguchi K, Tanaka Y, Hotani H 1998 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 1026
[13]	Capovilla R, Guven J, Santiago J A 2002 Phys. Rev. E 66 021607
[14]	Tu Z C, Ouyang Z C 2003 Phys. Rev. E 68 061915
[15]	Umeda T, Suezaki Y 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 011913
[16]	Kang W B, Zhang S G, Wang Y, Mu Y R, Huang C 2011 Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 54 2243
[17]	Huang C, Zhang S G 2013 J. Shaanxi Normal Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 41 31 (in Chinese) [黄聪, 张劭光 2013 陕西师范大学学报 41 31]
[18]	Kong X B, Zhang S G 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 068701 (in Chinese) [孔祥波, 张劭光 2016 物理学报 65 068701]
[19]	Ni D, Shi H J, Yin Y J 2005 Colloids Surf. B 46 162
[20]	L C J, Yin Y J, Yin J 2009 Colloids Surf. B 74 380
[21]	Canham P B 1970 J. Theoret. Biol. 26 61
[22]	Helfrich W 1973 Z. Naturforsch. C 28 693
[23]	Svetina S, Ottova-Lietmannova A, Glaser R 1982 J. Theor. Biol. 94 13
[24]	Svetina S, Zeks B 1985 Biomed. Biochim. Acta 44 979
[25]	Ouyang Z C, Helfrich W 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 2486
[26]	Ouyang Z C, Helfrich W 1989 Phys. Rev. A 39 5280
[27]	Miao L, Seifert U, Wortis M, Dbereiner H G 1994 Phys. Rev. E 49 5389
[28]	Seifert U, Berndl K, Lipowsky R 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 1182
[29]	Jlicher F, Lipowsky R 1996 Phys. Rev. E 53 2670
[30]	Yang P, Du Q, Tu Z C 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 042403

引用本文:

Citation:

计量

文章访问数: 970
PDF下载量: 173
被引次数: 0

单开口膜泡形状转变的研究

1. 陕西师范大学物理学与信息技术学院, 西安 710119

通信作者: 张劭光, zhangsg@snnu.edu.cn

基金项目:

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（批准号：GK201302011）和国家自然科学基金（批准号：10374063）资助的课题.

收稿日期: 2017-04-15

修回日期: 2017-05-05

刊出日期: 2017-08-05

摘要: 基于双层耦合模型，先通过求解无黏附能情况下满足给定边界条件的欧拉-拉格朗日方程组，找到了约化面积差a稍大于1的内凹开口形状解，并发现以往Umeda和Suezaki（2005 Phys.Rev.E 71 011913）给出的杯形解是对应a1的另一支解，该支解在a趋于1时开口是外凸的.进而在无黏附能和有黏附能的情况下对开口膜泡的两支解进行了深入研究，发现在a=1附近这两支解之间有一个间隙，在该间隙内不存在开口解.随着黏附半径的增大，该间隙的位置较缓慢地向右移动.在a=1附近，在无黏附能时的闭合形状只有球形一个解，而在有黏附能的情况下，闭合形状在1附近的一个区间内都有解.在无黏附及有黏附情况下的计算结果都表明这两支开口解及闭合形状属于不同的分支，它们之间不能连续演化.在间隙右侧的这一支解随着a的增大可以通过自交形状连续地演化到开口哑铃形.在有黏附的情况下，在a参数空间，同一支解会发生折叠，即出现同一a值对应多个解（形状）的情况，这在以往双层耦合模型的计算中没有出现过.讨论了a对无黏附和有黏附开口膜泡的形状和能量的影响.

关键词:

Shape transformations of opening-up vesicles with one hole

1.
College of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China

Fund Project:

Project supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No.GK201302011) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.10374063).

Received Date: 15 April 2017

Accepted Date: 05 May 2017

Published Online: 05 August 2017

Abstract: So far two kinds of solutions to the problem of opening-up vesicles with one hole have been found. One is cup-like shape found by Umeda and Suezaki (2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 011913), the other is dumbbell shape with one hole, found by our group. As seen in the context of the bilayer coupling (BC) model, the former corresponds to relatively small reduced area difference a, and the latter corresponds to relatively large value of a. The relationship between these two kinds of shapes is not clear. Viewing from the angle of the cup-like shape, whether one can obtain the dumbbell shape by increasing a is not known. In this paper, we try to clarify this problem by solving the shape equations for free vesicles and adhesive vesicles based on the BC model. Firstly, we solve the set of Euler-Lagrange shape equations that satisfy certain boundary conditions for free vesicles. A branch of solution with an inward hole is found with the reduced area difference a slightly greater than 1. It is verified that the solution named cuplike vesicles, which was found by Umeda and Suezaki, belongs to another solution branch (a 1) with an outward hole near a=1. According to this result, we make a detailed study of these two solution branches for free vesicles and vesicles with adhesion energy. We find that there is a gap near a=1 between the two solution branches. For a in this gap, there is no opening-up solution. For adhesive vesicles, the gap will move towards the right side slowly with increasing adhesive radius. In order to check whether the two solution branches can evolve into closed shapes, we also make a calculation for closed vesicles. For free closed vesicles, we find that there is only the sphere solution when a is exactly equal to 1 for p=0 (in order to comply with the opening-up vesicle, no volume constraint is imposed on it), while for adhesive vesicles there exist closed solutions in a region of a without volume constraint. Both studies for free vesicles and adhesive vesicles show that these two kinds of opening-up vesicles belong to different solution branches. They cannot evolve from one to the other with continuous parameter changing. And strictly speaking, they cannot evolve into the closed vesicles. With increasing a, the opening-up branch on the right side of the gap can evolve into an opening-up dumbbell shape with one hole via the self-intersection intermediate shapes. Another interesting result is that for adhesive opening-up vesicles, in the a parametric space, the solutions are folded for a solution branch, which means that there exist several shapes corresponding to the same a value in the folding domain. This phenomenon has never occurred in previous study of the closed vesicles under the BC model. The influences of a on the shape and energy of the free vesicles and adhesive vesicles are also studied.

Keywords:

全文HTML

参考文献 (30)

搜索

留言板