-
Spintronic terahertz (THz) emitter has more advantages such as lower cost, broader spectrum and easier operation than the commercial THz emitters, and thus has become a focus of research towards the next-generation THz source. However, in such a spintronic THz emitter, an external magnetic field is technologically required to align the orientation of the magnetization, which is detrimental for practical applications. Here, a spintronic terahertz emitter based on IrMn/Fe/Pt exchange bias structure is presented. By means of ultrafast spin injection on Fe/Pt interface followed by the spin-to-charge conversion in Pt, plus the effective magnetic field originating from the IrMn/Fe interface, the THz pulse with considerable intensity can be generated in such a structure without the assistance of external field. Besides, the remanent magnetization for thin Fe layer is enhanced by inserting an ultrathin Cu layer between the IrMn surface and the Fe surface, which is beneficial to the field-free THz emission. The range of obtained dynamic THz spectrum exceeds 60 dB and the positive saturation field can reach up to ~ –10 mT by optimizing the multilayer thickness, meeting the standard for commercial application. By rotating the sample, it is found that the polarization direction of the generated THz wave circulates simultaneously and keeps perpendicular to the direction of exchange bias field in the film plane. Moreover, we design a spin valve THz emitter based on the structure of IrMn/Fe/Pt/Fe by adding a free ferromagnetic Fe layer into the exchange bias multilayers. The emitted THz pulse amplitude is larger for the antiparallel alignment of the Fe layers at zero field than for the parallel alignment or exchange bias structure. The present work shows that the spin terahertz emitter based on IrMn/Fe/Pt exchange bias structure can produce the considerable terahertz signals without external field. Furthermore, the polarization direction of the emitted THz signal can be easily manipulated by rotating the sample. Because of this series of advantages, such exchange bias heterostructures are expected to play an important role in designing the next-generation THz source.
-
Keywords:
- terahertz /
- exchange bias /
- ultrafast spin transport /
- magnetic heterostructure
[1] Tonouchi M 2007 Nat. Photonics 1 97
Google Scholar
[2] Neu J, Schmuttenmaer C A 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 124 231101
Google Scholar
[3] Kampfrath T, Battiato M, Maldonado P, Eilers G, Notzold J, Mahrlein S, Zbarsky V, Freimuth F, Mokrousov Y, Blugel S, Wolf M, Radu I, Oppeneer P M, Munzenberg M 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 256
Google Scholar
[4] Seifert T, Jaiswal S, Martens U, Hannegan J, Braun L, Maldonado P, Freimuth F, Kronenberg A, Henrizi J, Radu I, Beaurepaire E, Mokrousov Y, Oppeneer P M, Jourdan M, Jakob G, Turchinovich D, Hayden L M, Wolf M, Münzenberg M, Kläui M, Kampfrath T 2016 Nat. Photonics 10 483
Google Scholar
[5] Feng Z, Yu R, Zhou Y, Lu H, Tan W, Deng H, Liu Q, Zhai Z, Zhu L, Cai J, Miao B, Ding H 2018 Adv. Optical Mater. 6 1800965
Google Scholar
[6] Herapath R I, Hornett S M, Seifert T S, Jakob G, Klaui M, Bertolotti J, Kampfrath T, Hendry E 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 041107
Google Scholar
[7] Wu Y, Elyasi M, Qiu X P, Chen M J, Liu Y, Ke L, Yang H 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1603031
Google Scholar
[8] Yang D W, Liang J H, Zhou C, Sun L, Zheng R, Luo S N, Wu Y Z, Qi J B 2016 Adv. Optical Mater. 4 1944
Google Scholar
[9] Sasaki Y, Kota Y, Iihama S, Suzuki K Z, Sakuma A, Mizukami S 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 140406(R)
[10] Schneider R, Fix M, Heming R, de Vasconcellos S M, Albrecht M, Bratschitsch R 2018 Acs Photonics 5 3936
Google Scholar
[11] Nandi U, Abdelaziz M S, Jaiswal S, Jakob G, Gueckstock O, Rouzegar S M, Seifert T S, Klaui M, Kampfrath T, Preu S 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 022405
Google Scholar
[12] Torosyan G, Keller S, Scheuer L, Beigang R, Papaioannou E T 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 1311
Google Scholar
[13] Li J G, Jin Z M, Song B J, Zhang S N, Guo C Y, Wan C H, Han X F, Cheng Z X, Zhang C, Lin X, Ma G H, Yao J Q 2019 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58 090913
Google Scholar
[14] Nogues J, Schuller I K 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 192 203
Google Scholar
[15] Gokemeijer N J, Ambrose T, Chien C L 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 4270
Google Scholar
[16] Liu T, Zhu T, Cai J W, Sun L 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 094504
Google Scholar
[17] Zhang H, Feng Z, Zhang J, Bai H, Yang H, Cai J, Zhao W, Tan W, Hu F, Shen B, Sun J 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 024435
Google Scholar
[18] Zou L K, Zhang Y, Gu L, Cai J W, Sun L 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 075309
Google Scholar
[19] Fix M, Schneider R, de Vasconcellos S M, Bratschitsch R, Albrecht M 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 117 132407
Google Scholar
[20] Zhang Q, Yang Y, Luo Z, Xu Y, Nie R, Zhang X, Wu Y 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 054016
Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a) 样品结构以及太赫兹信号激发示意图; (b) MgO(111)/Pt(1.5 nm)/IrMn(6 nm)/Fe(1.5 nm)/Pt(1.8 nm) (黑线)和MgO(111)/Pt(1.5 nm)/IrMn(6 nm)/Cu(0.4 nm)/Fe(1.5 nm)/Pt(1.8 nm) (红线)在外场沿交换偏置方向时的磁化曲线
Figure 1. (a) Illustration of the layer stacking and THz excitation configuration; (b) M-H loops for the MgO(111)/Pt(1.5 nm)/IrMn(6 nm)/Fe(1.5 nm)/Pt(1.8 nm) (black line) and MgO(111)/Pt(1.5 nm)/IrMn(6 nm)/Cu(0.4 nm)/Fe(1.5 nm)/Pt(1.8 nm) (red line) on the applied in-plane magnetic field parallel to the exchange bias direction.
图 2 MgO(111)/Pt(1.5 nm)/IrMn(6 nm)/Cu(0.4 nm)/Fe(2 nm)/Pt(1.8 nm)无外场下的太赫兹脉冲信号 (a); 太赫兹脉冲振幅随外场的变化关系(b); 由图(a)得到的傅里叶谱图(c)
Figure 2. THz emission signals of MgO(111)/Pt(1.5 nm)/IrMn(6 nm)/Cu(0.4 nm)/Fe(2 nm)/Pt(1.8 nm) samples without external field(a); magnetic dependence of the THz amplitude (b); Fourier spectra obtained from the data in Fig.(a) (c).
图 3 (a) tFe = 1, 1.5, 2和2.5 nm时, MgO(111)/Pt(1.5 nm)/IrMn(6 nm)/Cu(0.4 nm)/Fe(tFe nm)/Pt(1.8 nm) 样品太赫兹脉冲振幅随着外场的变化曲线; (b) tFe = 1.5 nm时, 不同Cu和Pt厚度下其太赫兹脉冲振幅随外场的变化曲线; (c) MgO(111)/Pt(1.5 nm)/IrMn(6 nm)/Cu(0.4 nm)/Fe(2.5 nm)/Pt(1.8 nm) 与MgO(111)/Fe(1.5 nm)/Pt(1.8 nm) 的太赫兹脉冲信号对比
Figure 3. (a) THz amplitude as a function magnetic field for the MgO(111)/Pt(1.5 nm)/IrMn(6 nm)/Cu(0.4 nm)/Fe(tFe nm)/Pt(1.8 nm) samples, where tFe = 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 nm; (b) comparison of the magnetic dependent THz amplitude in 1.5 nm Fe with different thickness of Cu and Pt; (c) effect of 6 nm IrMn layer on THz signals.
图 4 MgO(111)/Pt(1.5 nm)/IrMn(6 nm)/Cu(0.4 nm)/Fe(2 nm)/Pt(1.8 nm)在
$\varphi$ = 0°(a)和$\varphi$ = 90°(b)时偏振方向分别沿x和y方向的太赫兹脉冲信号; (c)太赫兹脉冲偏振方向沿x和y方向的分量随$\varphi$ 的变化关系, 实线代表用cos函数进行拟合的结果. (d)不同$\varphi$ 下, 太赫兹脉冲的矢量分布示意图Figure 4. THz emission signals with x-directional andy-directional polarization for the MgO(111)/Pt(1.5 nm)/IrMn(6 nm)/Cu(0.4 nm)/Fe(2 nm)/Pt(1.8 nm) sample at
$ \phi $ = 0° (a) and$\varphi$ = 90° (b), respectively; (c) x-directional andy-directional polarization THz pulse amplitude as a function of$\varphi$ . Solid lines in (c) are fitting curves using a cosine function; (d) distribution of THz emission signals vector at different$\varphi$ . -
[1] Tonouchi M 2007 Nat. Photonics 1 97
Google Scholar
[2] Neu J, Schmuttenmaer C A 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 124 231101
Google Scholar
[3] Kampfrath T, Battiato M, Maldonado P, Eilers G, Notzold J, Mahrlein S, Zbarsky V, Freimuth F, Mokrousov Y, Blugel S, Wolf M, Radu I, Oppeneer P M, Munzenberg M 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 256
Google Scholar
[4] Seifert T, Jaiswal S, Martens U, Hannegan J, Braun L, Maldonado P, Freimuth F, Kronenberg A, Henrizi J, Radu I, Beaurepaire E, Mokrousov Y, Oppeneer P M, Jourdan M, Jakob G, Turchinovich D, Hayden L M, Wolf M, Münzenberg M, Kläui M, Kampfrath T 2016 Nat. Photonics 10 483
Google Scholar
[5] Feng Z, Yu R, Zhou Y, Lu H, Tan W, Deng H, Liu Q, Zhai Z, Zhu L, Cai J, Miao B, Ding H 2018 Adv. Optical Mater. 6 1800965
Google Scholar
[6] Herapath R I, Hornett S M, Seifert T S, Jakob G, Klaui M, Bertolotti J, Kampfrath T, Hendry E 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 114 041107
Google Scholar
[7] Wu Y, Elyasi M, Qiu X P, Chen M J, Liu Y, Ke L, Yang H 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1603031
Google Scholar
[8] Yang D W, Liang J H, Zhou C, Sun L, Zheng R, Luo S N, Wu Y Z, Qi J B 2016 Adv. Optical Mater. 4 1944
Google Scholar
[9] Sasaki Y, Kota Y, Iihama S, Suzuki K Z, Sakuma A, Mizukami S 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 140406(R)
[10] Schneider R, Fix M, Heming R, de Vasconcellos S M, Albrecht M, Bratschitsch R 2018 Acs Photonics 5 3936
Google Scholar
[11] Nandi U, Abdelaziz M S, Jaiswal S, Jakob G, Gueckstock O, Rouzegar S M, Seifert T S, Klaui M, Kampfrath T, Preu S 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 022405
Google Scholar
[12] Torosyan G, Keller S, Scheuer L, Beigang R, Papaioannou E T 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 1311
Google Scholar
[13] Li J G, Jin Z M, Song B J, Zhang S N, Guo C Y, Wan C H, Han X F, Cheng Z X, Zhang C, Lin X, Ma G H, Yao J Q 2019 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 58 090913
Google Scholar
[14] Nogues J, Schuller I K 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 192 203
Google Scholar
[15] Gokemeijer N J, Ambrose T, Chien C L 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 4270
Google Scholar
[16] Liu T, Zhu T, Cai J W, Sun L 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 094504
Google Scholar
[17] Zhang H, Feng Z, Zhang J, Bai H, Yang H, Cai J, Zhao W, Tan W, Hu F, Shen B, Sun J 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 024435
Google Scholar
[18] Zou L K, Zhang Y, Gu L, Cai J W, Sun L 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 075309
Google Scholar
[19] Fix M, Schneider R, de Vasconcellos S M, Bratschitsch R, Albrecht M 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 117 132407
Google Scholar
[20] Zhang Q, Yang Y, Luo Z, Xu Y, Nie R, Zhang X, Wu Y 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 054016
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 3259
- PDF Downloads: 82
- Cited By: 0
