-
The development of multi-channel data acquisition techniques has provided richer prior information for studying the nonlinear dynamic characteristics of complex systems. However, conventional nonlinear feature extraction algorithms prove unsuitable in the context of multi-channel data. Previously, the Multivariate Multiscale Sample Entropy (MMSE) algorithm was introduced for multi-channel data analysis. Although the MMSE algorithm generalized the multiscale sample entropy algorithm, presenting a novel method for multidimensional data analysis, it remains deficient in theoretical underpinning and suffers from shortcomings, such as missing cross-channel correlation information and having biased estimation results. In this paper, unbiased multivariate multiscale sample entropy algorithm (UMMSE) is proposed. UMMSE increases the embedding dimension from $M$ to $M+p$. This increasing strategy facilitates the reconstruction of a deterministic phase space. By virtue of theoretical scrutiny grounded in probability theory and subsequent experimental validation, this paper illustrates the algorithm's effectiveness in extracting inter-channel correlation information through the integration of cross-channel conditional probabilities. The computation of similarities between sample points across different channels is recognized as a potential source of bias and instability in algorithms.Through simulation experiments, this study delineates the parameter selection range for the UMMSE algorithm. Subsequently, diverse simulation signals are employed to showcase the UMMSE algorithm's efficacy in extracting both within-channel and cross-channel correlation information. Ultimately, this paper demonstrates that the new algorithm has the lowest computational cost compared with traditional MMSE algorithms.
-
Keywords:
- Nonlinear Dynamics /
- Multi-channel Signal /
- MMSE
-
[1] Fowler A C, Gibbon J D, McGuinness M J 1982 Physica. D 4 139-163.
[2] Gao Z, Jin N 2009 Chaos 19 033137.
[3] López C, Naranjo á, Lu S, Moore K 2022 J. Sound. Vib 528 116890.
[4] Wang Q B, Yang Y J, Zhang X 2020 Chaos. Soliton. Fract 137 109832.
[5] Kunze M 2007 Non-Smooth Dynamical Systems (Heidelberg:Springer Berlin) 1744 pp63-140.
[6] Zarei A, Asl B M 2018 IEEE. J. Biomed. Health 23 1011-1021.
[7] He H, Tan Y 2017 Appl. Soft. Comput 55 238-252.
[8] Liu B, Peng J H 2004 Nonlinear Dynamics (in Chinese)[刘秉正, 彭建华 2004 非线性动力学(北京:高等教育出版社)]
[9] G A Cranch, P J Nash, C K Kirkendall 2003 IEEE. Sens. J 3 19.
[10] Zhu X, Murch R D 2002 IEEE. T. Commun 50 187-191.
[11] Van Trees H L 2002 Optimum array processing:Part IV of detection, estimation, and modulation theory (New York:John Wiley and Sons).
[12] F Eren, S Pe'eri, M W Thein, Y Rzhanov, B Celikkol, M R Swift 2017 Sensors-Basel 17 1741.
[13] Shi Q Q, Li W, Tao R, Sun X, Gao L R 2019 Remote Sens-Basel 11 419.
[14] Xing X W, Ji K F, Zou H X, Chen W T, Sun J X 2013 IEEE. Geosci. Remote. S 10 1562-1566.
[15] Wang Z Y, Yao L G, Cai Y W 2020 Measurement 156 107574.
[16] Thuraisingham R A, Gottwald G A 2006 Physica. A 366 323-332.
[17] Li W J, Shen X H, Li Y A 2019 Entropy-Switz 21 793.
[18] Pincus S M 1991 P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 2297-2301.
[19] Richman J S, Moorman J R 2000 Am. J. Physiol-Heart. C 278 H2039-H2049.
[20] Bandt C, Pompe B 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett 88 174102.
[21] Costa M, Goldberger A L, Peng C K 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 021906.
[22] Ahmed M U, Mandic D P 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 061918.
[23] Li Y, Tang B, Jiao S, Zhou Y 2024 Chaos. Soliton. Fract 179 114436.
[24] Zhang Y C 1991 J. Phys. I France 1 971-977.
[25] Zhao C, Sun J, Lin S, Peng Y2022 Measurement 195 111190.
[26] Cao L Y, Mees A, Judd K 1998 Physica. D 121 75-88.
[27] Takens F 1980 Dynamical Systems and Turbulence (Heidelberg:Springer Berlin)1981 366-381.
Metrics
- Abstract views: 97
- PDF Downloads: 0
- Cited By: 0