-
The electromagnetic scattering of buried gyrotropic anisotropic media is crucial for resource exploration and environmental monitoring. However, the existing analytical solutions for electromagnetic scattering of a gyrotropic anisotropic sphere are primarily limited to free-space cases due to computational complexity. To address this limitation, an analytical solution that combines spherical vector wave functions (SVWFs), the T-matrix method, the image method, and the addition theorem of SVWFs is proposed in this work. The proposed method is detailed as follows. The transmitted field of a vertically incident plane wave transmitting through the ground serves as the first incident field on the gyrotropic anisotropic sphere, which can be expanded in terms of SVWFs. Using the analytical solution for a gyrotropic anisotropic sphere in free space, expressions for the internal electromagnetic field are derived. Based on the orthogonality of the SVWFs in the surface of the buried gyrotropic anisotropic sphere, the first scattered field is obtained. This scattered field then acts as the incident field on the ground, and its reflection is calculated using the image method. The reflected field can then serve as the secondary incident field for the dielectric sphere, and this process is repeated iteratively until the field components on the ground converge. Unlike the existing methods of computing the field at a fixed point for buried homogeneous cylinder or isotropic sphere, the proposed method computes the electric field distribution along a line L on the ground, which is parallel to both the Y-axis and the sphere's central axis. The comparison of the results from the proposed method with FEKO simulation results shows their excellent agreement with each other, with an average relative error below 0.1%, thereby validating the correctness of the proposed analytical solution. Moreover, compared with FEKO simulation method, the proposed analytical method indicates a significant advantage in computational efficiency. Using the analytical model established in this work, the influence of incident wave frequency, buried depth and other parameters on the distribution of electric field along the Y-axis is also analyzed in detail. These findings provide practical value for enhancing the accuracy of geological exploration and the reliability of environmental monitoring. -
Keywords:
- buried gyrotropic anisotropic sphere /
- electromagnetic scattering /
- spherical vector wave function /
- T-matrix method
-
图 1 埋藏旋电磁各向异性球体的几何结构
Figure 1. Geometry of the buried gyrotropic anisotropy sphere.
图 2 加法定理中$ {\boldsymbol{r}}, {\boldsymbol{r}}' $和$ {\boldsymbol{r}}'' $之间的关系
Figure 2. Connections among $ {\boldsymbol{r}}, {\boldsymbol{r}}' $ and $ {\boldsymbol{r}}'' $ in the additive theorem.
图 3 FEKO仿真图
Figure 3. FEKO simulation plot.
图 4 沿Y轴直线L的电场分布对比
Figure 4. Comparison of electric field distributions along line L on the Y-axis.
图 6 不同埋藏深度下沿Y轴直线L的电场分布对比, 曲线①埋藏深度d = 20 m, 曲线②埋藏深度d = 30 m
Figure 6. Comparison of electric field distributions along line L on the Y-axis at different burial depths. Curve 1: d = 20 m, Curve 2: d = 30 m.
图 5 不同入射波频率下沿Y轴直线L的电场分布对比, 曲线①频率f = 40 kHz, 曲线②频率f = 50 kHz
Figure 5. Comparison of electric field distributions along line L on the Y-axis at different incident wave frequencies. Curve 1: f = 40 kHz, Curve 2: f = 50 kHz.
-
[1] Rao Z N, Zhu G Q, He S Y, Li C, Yang Z W, Liu J 2022 Remote Sens. 14 764
Google Scholar
[2] Wang X F, Wang P, Zhang X T, Wan Y D, Shi H D, Liu W 2022 IEEE Sens. J. 22 13835
Google Scholar
[3] Wang L J, Zhang S, Chen S D, Luo C P 2022 Sensors 22 1648
Google Scholar
[4] Durach M 2023 Appl. Sci. 13 5169
Google Scholar
[5] Zhang H W, Huang X W, Sheng X Q 2022 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70 8204
Google Scholar
[6] Wang J, Li J, Chen Y, Han F, Liu Q H 2020 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68 6473
[7] Shi J K, Wang F, Zhang D M, Huang H W, Wu Y 2023 Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 140 105312
Google Scholar
[8] Wang K C, Liu J, Xu J H 2022 Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 134 139
Google Scholar
[9] Jiang X, Duan X 2022 J. Sci. Comput. 90 34
Google Scholar
[10] Amor-Martin A, Garcia-Castillo L E 2021 Appl. Sci. 11 3683
Google Scholar
[11] Zamani H, Tavakoli A, Dehmollaian M 2018 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66 347
Google Scholar
[12] Nasr M A, Eshrah I A, Hashish E A 2014 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62 2702
Google Scholar
[13] Zhang X X, Geng Y L, Cheng Z Q 2020 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68 3313
Google Scholar
[14] Geng Y L, Wu L J, Zhang P Q 2020 Proceedings of the 2020 Cross Strait Radio Science & Wireless Technology Conference (CSRSWTC) Fuzhou, China, December 13-16, 2020 p1
[15] Li J L W, Ong W L, Zheng K H 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 036601
Google Scholar
[16] 樊久扬, 张玉贤, 冯晓丽, 黄志祥 2024 物理学报 73 244101
Google Scholar
Fan J Y, Zhang Y X, Feng X L, Huang Z X 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 244101
Google Scholar
[17] 杨理践, 吕志鹏, 高松巍, 郑福印, 刘斌 2024 沈阳工业大学学报 46 97
Google Scholar
Yang L J, Lv Z P, Gao S W, Zheng F Y, Liu B 2024 J. Shenyang Univ. Tech. 46 97
Google Scholar
[18] 周君君 2022 博士学位论文 (武汉: 中国地质大学)
Zhou J J 2022 Ph. D. Dissertation (Wuhan: China University of Geosciences
[19] 马虎 2023 工矿自动化 49 75
Ma H 2023 J. Mine Automat. 49 75
[20] Wang Y M, Chew W 1993 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 41 1633
Google Scholar
[21] 冯明, 黄志勇, 方金鹏, 刘洋 2024 制导与引信 45 32
Google Scholar
Feng Ming, Huang Zhiyong, Fang Jinping, Liu Yang 2024 J. Guidance Fuse 45 32
Google Scholar
[22] 陈鑫淼, 李海英, 吴涛, 孟祥帅, 黎凤霞 2023 物理学报 72 100302
Google Scholar
Chen X M, Li H Y, Wu T, Meng X S, Li F X 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 100302
Google Scholar
[23] Geng Y, Lu T, Zhang P 2022 Proceedings of the 2022 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES-China) Xuzhou, China, December 9-12, 2022 p1
[24] Lin Z, Chui S T 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 056614
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Metrics
- Abstract views: 235
- PDF Downloads: 7
- Cited By: 0
