搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

解旋酶Sen1行走机制的研究

张悦悦 韩伟静 陈同生 王爽

引用本文:
Citation:

解旋酶Sen1行走机制的研究

张悦悦, 韩伟静, 陈同生, 王爽

Mechanism of Sen1 translocation

Zhang Yue-Yue, Han Wei-Jing, Chen Tong-Sheng, Wang Shuang
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 转录终止是调节基因转录过程的重要步骤, 关系到基因表达调控过程的正常进行和基因组的稳定性. 酵母体系中, Sen1是一种解旋酶, 通过水解腺苷三磷酸(adenosine triphosphate, ATP)获得能量来行使在核酸底物上的一维运动, 进而实现转录终止功能. 然而, Sen1的这种运动机制与转录终止功能的关联, 目前尚未清晰的表征. 本文应用凝胶电泳迁移方法表征Sen1解旋双链DNA和结合单链DNA的能力, 并且发现单个Sen1分子能够结合≤ 24 nt (nucleotide, nt)的单链DNA; 进一步, 在提供ATP的条件下, 应用单分子荧光共振能量转移技术表征了Sen1在单链DNA上的行走功能, 其行走速率随ATP浓度变化而变化, 符合经典米氏动力学模型; 考虑单链DNA底物的长度, 可以估算出Sen1的行走速率约为70 nt/s. 这些研究结果定量表征了Sen1的行走速率, 为理解真核转录终止机制提供了分子马达运动方面的实验数据.
    Transcription termination is a critical step for gene regulation and genome integrity among all kingdoms of life. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, one of the major termination pathways is accomplished by Sen1 helicase, a homolog to human Senataxin (SETX), defection of which raises the diseases for the central nervus system of human. Although it has been proposed that Sen1 translocates along nucleic acids by consuming adenosine triphosphates (ATPs) during termination, the mechanism for this translocation activity of Sen1 has not been well understood. In this work, our aim is to investigate the mechanism of Sen1 translocation by measuring the interactions between Sen1 and different types of nucleic acids by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) assay or single-molecule Fӧrster resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay. We firstly observe the unwinding activity of Sen1 on a tailed duplex DNA in the presence of 1 mM ATP via PAGE assay, where the translocation activity of Sen1 is involved. As the binding activity is crucial for translocation, then we examine the binding affinity of Sen1 to the single-stranded DNA via PAGE assay, revealing a stable binding of Sen1 with an occupied length of nucleic acids of less than 24 nt. In the presence of 1 µM ATP, we observe that Sen1 dynamically binds to and dissociates from the tailed duplex DNA in the single-molecule FRET assay. By titrating ATP concentrations from 1–500 µM, we observe a gradual decrease in the mean durations of Sen1 binding, suggesting an ATP-dependent binding affinity of Sen1 to single-stranded DNA. We then fit these mean durations to the classical Michaelis-Menten model and obtain a minimum binding duration of (0.18 ± 0.01) s at saturating ATP concentrations and Km of (13.1 ± 0.1) µM for the ATP-dependent binding of Sen1. This result is consistent with that from a translocation activity of Sen1. Taking into account the translocation length of the half of the single-stranded tail, i.e. 13 nt, a mean rate of 70 nt/s is estimated. Reversing the translocation direction, we observe an increase in the duration of Sen1 binding to the single-stranded tail, which suggests an impediment of DNA duplex in front of Sen1 translocation or the possible duplex DNA unwinding activity of Sen1. Our quantitative measurements on Sen1 translocation are helpful in deepening our understanding of the mechanism of eukaryotic transcription termination by Sen1.
      通信作者: 王爽, shuangwang@iphy.ac.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 32071228, 12004420, 12004271, 12274308, 62135003)、中国科学院战略先导科技专项(B类)资助(批准号: XDB37000000)、中国科学院青年创新促进会(批准号: 2021009)和广东省重点领域研发计划“精密仪器设备”专题项目(批准号: 21202107221900001, 2022B0303040003)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Wang Shuang, shuangwang@iphy.ac.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 32071228, 12004420, 12004271, 12274308, 62135003), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China (Grant No. XDB37000000), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China (Grant No. 2021009), and the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, China (Grant Nos. 21202107221900001, 2022B0303040003).
    [1]

    Roeder R G 2019 Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26 783Google Scholar

    [2]

    Jonkers I, Lis J T 2015 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16 167Google Scholar

    [3]

    Abbondanzieri E A, Greenleaf W J, Shaevitz J W, Landick R, Block S M 2005 Nature 438 460Google Scholar

    [4]

    You L, Omollo E O, Yu C, Mooney R A, Shi J, Shen L, Wu X, Wen A, He D, Zeng Y, Feng Y, Landick R, Zhang Y 2023 Nature 613 783Google Scholar

    [5]

    Molodtsov V, Wang C, Firlar E, Kaelber J T, Ebright R H 2023 Nature 614 367Google Scholar

    [6]

    West S, Gromak N, Proudfoot N J 2004 Nature 432 522Google Scholar

    [7]

    Porrua O, Libri D 2013 Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20 884Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wang S, Han Z, Libri D, Porrua O, Strick T R 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1545Google Scholar

    [9]

    Vasiljeva L, Kim M, Mutschler H, Buratowski S, Meinhart A 2008 Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15 795Google Scholar

    [10]

    Arndt K M, Reines D 2015 Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84 381Google Scholar

    [11]

    Rondón A G, Mischo H E, Kawauchi J, Proudfoot N J 2009 Mol. Cell. 36 88Google Scholar

    [12]

    Jia X, Li Y, Wang T, Bi L, Guo L, Chen Z, Zhang X, Ye S, Chen J, Yang B, Sun B 2023 Embo. J. 42 e111703Google Scholar

    [13]

    Saper G, Hess H 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 288Google Scholar

    [14]

    Nishizaka T 2010 Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 119 3Google Scholar

    [15]

    Martin-Tumasz S, Brow D A 2015 J. Biol. Chem. 290 22880Google Scholar

    [16]

    Han Z, Libri D, Porrua O 2017 Nucleic. Acids. Res. 45 1355Google Scholar

    [17]

    Skourti-Stathaki K, Proudfoot N J, Gromak N 2011 Mol. Cell. 42 794Google Scholar

    [18]

    Ha T, Enderle T, Ogletree D F, Chemla D S, Selvin P R, Weiss S 1996 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 6264Google Scholar

    [19]

    Maki A H, Co T 1976 Biochemistry 15 1229Google Scholar

    [20]

    Leonaitė B, Han Z, Basquin J, Bonneau F, Libri D, Porrua O, Conti E 2017 Embo. J. 36 1590Google Scholar

    [21]

    Shi J, Wang F, Li F, Wang L, Xiong Y, Wen A, Jin Y, Jin S, Gao F, Feng Z, Li J, Zhang Y, Shang Z, Wang S, Feng Y, Lin W 2022 Nucleic. Acids. Res. 50 5974Google Scholar

    [22]

    Fiorini F, Bagchi D, Le Hir H, Croquette V 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7581Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chakrabarti S, Jayachandran U, Bonneau F, Fiorini F, Basquin C, Domcke S, Le Hir H, Conti E 2011 Mol. Cell. 41 693Google Scholar

    [24]

    Hazelbaker D Z, Marquardt S, Wlotzka W, Buratowski S 2013 Mol. Cell. 49 55Google Scholar

  • 图 1  聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳表征Sen1 HD解旋双链DNA活性 (a) Sen1解旋酶蛋白结构域模式图. (b) 实验方法示意图, Sen1 HD作用于5'-50ss-20duplex底物, 通过水解ATP获得能量来解开20-nt FAM ssDNA. (c) 对FAM荧光成像结果1道为20-nt FAM ssDNA的条带位置; 2道为5'-50ss-20duplex的条带位置; 3道为5'-50ss-20duplex与20-nt竞争ssDNA 30 ℃孵育20 min的结果, 无20-nt FAM ssDNA产生; 4道为5'-50ss-20duplex、20-nt竞争ssDNA和Sen1 HD 30 ℃孵育20 min的结果, 无20-nt FAM ssDNA产生; 5道为5'-50ss-20duplex, 20-nt竞争ssDNA, Sen1 HD, ATP条件下, 30 ℃孵育20 min的结果, 产生20-nt FAM ssDNA

    Fig. 1.  Characterization of Sen1 HD unwinding activity on double-stranded DNA via PAGE assay. (a) Domain pattern of Sen1. (b) Schematic of PAGE assay, Sen1 HD acts on the 5'-50ss-20duplex substrate to unwind the 20-nt FAM ssDNA by hydrolyzing ATP. (c) Fluorescence imaging of PAGE result: the first lane represents the band position of 20-nt FAM ssDNA; the second lane represents the band position of 5'-50ss-20duplex; the third lane represented 5'-50ss-20duplex with 20-nt competed ssDNA incubated at 30 ℃ for 20 min, but no 20-nt FAM ssDNA was produced; the fourth lane represented 5'-50ss-20duplex with 20-nt competed ssDNA and Sen1 HD incubated at 30 ℃ for 20 min, but no 20-nt FAM ssDNA was produced; the fifth lane, 20-nt FAM ssDNA was produced after incubation for 20 min at 30 ℃ under the condition of 5'-50ss-20duplex, 20-nt competed ssDNA, Sen1 HD and ATP.

    图 2  Sen1 HD与Cy3-48ssDNA结合的PAGE实验 (a) Sen1 HD与Cy3-48ssDNA结合示意图. (b) Cy3荧光成像结果. 第1道为Cy3-48ssDNA原始长度; 第2道为5 nM Sen1 HD与Cy3-48ssDNA 30 ℃孵育30 min的结果; 第3道为25 nM Sen1 HD与Cy3-48ssDNA 30 ℃孵育30 min的结果; 第4道为50 nM Sen1 HD与Cy3-48ssDNA 30 ℃孵育30 min的结果

    Fig. 2.  Sen1 HD binding activity to Cy3-48ssDNA characterized via PAGE assay. (a) Schematic of Sen1 HD binding to Cy3-48ssDNA. (b) Fluorescence imaging of Cy3 fluorophore: the first lane represents the original length of Cy3-48ssDNA; the second lane represents the result of 5 nM Sen1 HD incubation with Cy3-48ssDNA at 30 ℃ for 30 min; the third lane represents the result of 25 nM Sen1 HD incubation with Cy3-48ssDNA at 30 ℃ for 30 minutes; the fourth lane represents the result of 50 nM Sen1 HD incubation with Cy3-48ssDNA at 30 ℃ for 30 min.

    图 3  单分子FRET方法表征Sen1 HD-SNAP649在5'-26ss-34duplex上的行走功能(1 µM ATP条件下) (a) 单分子FRET方法示意图, 在5'-26ss-34duplex结构中, 岔口5'端标有Cy3荧光, Sen1 HD上标有SNAP649荧光; (b) Sen1 HD-SNAP649行走的典型曲线; (c) FRET持续时间的分布图

    Fig. 3.  Sen1 HD-SNAP649 translocation activity on 5'-26ss-34duplex characterized via single-molecule FRET assay under 1 μM ATP condition: (a) Schematic for the assay, in the 5'-26ss-34duplex construct, the 5' end of the fork is labeled with Cy3, and Sen1 HD is labeled with SNAP649; (b) a typical trajectory representing Sen1 HD-SNAP649 translocation on DNA substrate; (c) distribution of the FRET dwell times corresponding to Sen1 HD-SNAP649 translocation.

    图 4  Sen1 HD-SNAP649行走功能的米氏动力学分析

    Fig. 4.  Translocation activity of Sen1 HD-SNAP649 analyzed via the classical Michaelis-Menten model.

    图 5  单分子FRET方法表征Sen1 HD-SNAP649在3'-26ss-34duplex上的行走(1 µM ATP条件) (a) 实验示意图, 在3'-26ss-34duplex结构中, 岔口3' 端标有Cy3荧光, Sen1 HD上标有SNAP649荧光; (b) Sen1 HD-SNAP649行走的典型曲线; (c) FRET持续时间的分布图

    Fig. 5.  Translocation activity of Sen1 HD-SNAP649 on 3'-26ss-34duplex characterized via single-molecule FRET assay under 1 μM ATP condition: (a) Schematic of the assay, and in the construct of 3'-26ss-34duplex, the 3' end of the fork is labeled with Cy3, and Sen1 HD is labeled with SNAP649; (b) a typical trajectory representing Sen1 HD-SNAP649 translocation; (c) histogram of the FRET dwell times for Sen1 HD-SNAP649 translocation.

    表 1  DNA底物序列信息及其应用

    Table 1.  DNA sequences and their applications.

    DNA底物名称DNA序列(5'-3')应用
    5'-50ss-20duplex20-nt FAM ssDNA: GTT GGG TAA CGC CAG GGA CG-3'FAM70-nt ssDNA: ATT ACG GAT TCA CTG GCC GTC GTT TTA CAA CGT CGT GAC TGG GAA AAA CGC GTC CCT GGC GTT ACC CAA CDNA退火后形成具有50 nt单链结合位点的20 bp 双链DNA底物, 用于表征Sen1 HD解旋活性
    Cy3-48ssDNAAGC TGG ATA CTT ACA GCC ATG GCT GCT GCG AAT ACT CCA TTC CAT CCC用于验证Sen1 HD与单链DNA的结合能力
    5'-26ss-34duplex5'bio-60ssDNA: 5'Biotin-GCC AGG AGG CTA GCA ACA GTC TTC ATT CAA CCG ACG TCA CAA TAG TGA GTA CCA ATA CCT5'Cy3-34ssDNA: 5'Cy3-TCG GTT GAA TGA AGA CTG TTG CTA GCC TCC TGG CDNA退火后形成具有26 nt 单链结合位点沿5'-3'方向远离DNA岔口的34 bp双链DNA底物, 用于表征Sen1 HD-SNAP649在单链DNA上的行走功能
    3'-26ss-34duplex3'bio-60ssDNA: TCC ATA ACC ATG AGT GAT AAC ACT GCA GCC AAC TTA CTT CTG ACA ACG ATC GGA GGA CCG-3'Biotin3'Cy3-34ssDNA: CGG TCC TCC GAT CGT TGT CAG AAG TAA GTT GGC T-3'Cy3DNA退火后形成26 nt 单链结合位点沿5'-3'方向靠近DNA岔口的34 bp双链DNA底物, 用于表征Sen1 HD-SNAP649在单链DNA上的行走方向
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Roeder R G 2019 Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26 783Google Scholar

    [2]

    Jonkers I, Lis J T 2015 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16 167Google Scholar

    [3]

    Abbondanzieri E A, Greenleaf W J, Shaevitz J W, Landick R, Block S M 2005 Nature 438 460Google Scholar

    [4]

    You L, Omollo E O, Yu C, Mooney R A, Shi J, Shen L, Wu X, Wen A, He D, Zeng Y, Feng Y, Landick R, Zhang Y 2023 Nature 613 783Google Scholar

    [5]

    Molodtsov V, Wang C, Firlar E, Kaelber J T, Ebright R H 2023 Nature 614 367Google Scholar

    [6]

    West S, Gromak N, Proudfoot N J 2004 Nature 432 522Google Scholar

    [7]

    Porrua O, Libri D 2013 Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20 884Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wang S, Han Z, Libri D, Porrua O, Strick T R 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1545Google Scholar

    [9]

    Vasiljeva L, Kim M, Mutschler H, Buratowski S, Meinhart A 2008 Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15 795Google Scholar

    [10]

    Arndt K M, Reines D 2015 Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84 381Google Scholar

    [11]

    Rondón A G, Mischo H E, Kawauchi J, Proudfoot N J 2009 Mol. Cell. 36 88Google Scholar

    [12]

    Jia X, Li Y, Wang T, Bi L, Guo L, Chen Z, Zhang X, Ye S, Chen J, Yang B, Sun B 2023 Embo. J. 42 e111703Google Scholar

    [13]

    Saper G, Hess H 2020 Chem. Rev. 120 288Google Scholar

    [14]

    Nishizaka T 2010 Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 119 3Google Scholar

    [15]

    Martin-Tumasz S, Brow D A 2015 J. Biol. Chem. 290 22880Google Scholar

    [16]

    Han Z, Libri D, Porrua O 2017 Nucleic. Acids. Res. 45 1355Google Scholar

    [17]

    Skourti-Stathaki K, Proudfoot N J, Gromak N 2011 Mol. Cell. 42 794Google Scholar

    [18]

    Ha T, Enderle T, Ogletree D F, Chemla D S, Selvin P R, Weiss S 1996 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 6264Google Scholar

    [19]

    Maki A H, Co T 1976 Biochemistry 15 1229Google Scholar

    [20]

    Leonaitė B, Han Z, Basquin J, Bonneau F, Libri D, Porrua O, Conti E 2017 Embo. J. 36 1590Google Scholar

    [21]

    Shi J, Wang F, Li F, Wang L, Xiong Y, Wen A, Jin Y, Jin S, Gao F, Feng Z, Li J, Zhang Y, Shang Z, Wang S, Feng Y, Lin W 2022 Nucleic. Acids. Res. 50 5974Google Scholar

    [22]

    Fiorini F, Bagchi D, Le Hir H, Croquette V 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7581Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chakrabarti S, Jayachandran U, Bonneau F, Fiorini F, Basquin C, Domcke S, Le Hir H, Conti E 2011 Mol. Cell. 41 693Google Scholar

    [24]

    Hazelbaker D Z, Marquardt S, Wlotzka W, Buratowski S 2013 Mol. Cell. 49 55Google Scholar

  • [1] 张志鹏, 刘帅, 张玉琼, 熊影, 韩伟静, 陈同生, 王爽. 单分子磁镊旋转操控和基因转录调控动力学. 物理学报, 2023, 72(21): 218701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231089
    [2] 罗泽伟, 武戈, 陈挚, 邓驰楠, 万蓉, 杨涛, 庄正飞, 陈同生. 双通道结构光照明超分辨定量荧光共振能量转移成像系统. 物理学报, 2023, 72(20): 208701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230853
    [3] 周利, 王取泉. 等离激元共振能量转移与增强光催化研究进展. 物理学报, 2019, 68(14): 147301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190276
    [4] 李东阳, 张远宪, 欧永雄, 普小云. 聚二甲基硅氧烷微流道中光流控荧光共振能量转移激光. 物理学报, 2019, 68(5): 054203. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181696
    [5] 陈泽, 马建兵, 黄星榞, 贾棋, 徐春华, 张慧东, 陆颖. 单分子技术研究T7解旋酶的解旋与换链. 物理学报, 2018, 67(11): 118201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180501
    [6] 秦亚强, 陈瑞云, 石莹, 周海涛, 张国峰, 秦成兵, 高岩, 肖连团, 贾锁堂. 共轭聚合物单分子构象和能量转移特性研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(24): 248201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.248201
    [7] 吕袭明, 李辉, 尤菁, 李伟, 王鹏业, 李明, 奚绪光, 窦硕星. 单分子荧光共振能量转移数据处理的优化算法. 物理学报, 2017, 66(11): 118701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.118701
    [8] 王丹丹, 李志坚. 一维相位缺陷量子行走的共振传输. 物理学报, 2016, 65(6): 060301. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.060301
    [9] 刘艳梅, 陈汉武, 刘志昊, 薛希玲, 朱皖宁. 星图上的散射量子行走搜索算法. 物理学报, 2015, 64(1): 010301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.010301
    [10] 胡耀光, 王圣军, 金涛, 屈世显. 度关联无标度网络上的有倾向随机行走. 物理学报, 2015, 64(2): 028901. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.028901
    [11] 李牧野, 李芳, 魏来, 何志聪, 张俊佩, 韩俊波, 陆培祥. CdTe量子点与罗丹明B水溶液体系下的双光子激发荧光共振能量转移. 物理学报, 2015, 64(10): 108201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.108201
    [12] 何志聪, 李芳, 李牧野, 魏来. CdTe量子点-铜酞菁复合体系荧光共振能量转移的研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(4): 046802. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.046802
    [13] 宫明艳. He原子和BH分子碰撞体系的转动激发能量转移. 物理学报, 2011, 60(7): 073401. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.073401
    [14] 林 方, 包景东. 基于连续时间无规行走模型研究反常扩散. 物理学报, 2008, 57(2): 696-702. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.696
    [15] 武春红, 刘彭义, 侯林涛, 李艳武. 磷光染料掺杂有机分子发光的能量转移研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(11): 7317-7321. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7317
    [16] 郑永真, 冯兴亚, 郑银甲, 郭干城, 徐德明, 邓中朝. 用激光吹气注入高Z杂质使HL-1M托卡马克放电安全终止的研究. 物理学报, 2005, 54(6): 2809-2813. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2809
    [17] 潘多海, 马永红. 表面增强的分子间能量转移效应的机理研究. 物理学报, 1995, 44(12): 1914-1920. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1914
    [18] 唐坤发, 胡嘉桢. Fractal空间上自迴避行走的吸收问题. 物理学报, 1988, 37(6): 1014-1017. doi: 10.7498/aps.37.1014
    [19] 高文斌, 沈玉其, J. H?GER, W. KRIEGER. 激光诱导荧光法研究CH2Cl2分子的振动能量转移. 物理学报, 1985, 34(10): 1261-1269. doi: 10.7498/aps.34.1261
    [20] 张华. 正烷属烃分子的激发理论与能量转移问题. 物理学报, 1964, 20(5): 436-443. doi: 10.7498/aps.20.436
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2741
  • PDF下载量:  96
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-02-13
  • 修回日期:  2023-03-08
  • 上网日期:  2023-03-28
  • 刊出日期:  2023-05-20

/

返回文章
返回