Multi-band response Cs2AgBiBr6 double perovskite photodetector based on TiO2 nanopillars

Sun Tang-You; Yu Yan-Li; Qin Zu-Bin; Chen Zan-Hui; Chen Jun-Li; Jiang Yue; Zhang Fa-Bi

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20231919

Abstract

Photodetectors are widely used in the fields of environmental monitoring, medical analysis, security surveillance, optical communication and biosensing due to their high responsiveness, fast response time, low power consumption, good stability and low processing cost. Fully inorganic lead-free perovskite material (Cs₂AgBiBr₆) has received a lot of attention in recent years in the research of photodetector applications due to its advantages of long carrier lifetime, high stability, moderate forbidden bandwidth, and environmental friendliness. For perovskite photodetectors, the semiconductor nanopillar array structure can effectively reduce the reflection loss of light from the surface to improve the absorption of incident light in the device and inhibit the exciton complexes in the device, and the good energy level matching between TiO₂ and Cs₂AgBiBr₆ can effectively promote the transport and extraction of carriers in the device. However, there are few reports on the use of TiO₂ nanopillar arrays as a transport layer to improve the performance of Cs₂AgBiBr₆ photodetectors. In this work, high-quality Cs₂AgBiBr₆ thin films with large grain size, no visible pinholes, and good uniform coverage are successfully prepared by a low-pressure-assisted spin-coating method under ambient conditions. Hydrothermally grown TiO₂ nanopillar arrays are embedded into the Cs₂AgBiBr₆ layer to form a close core-shell structure, increasing the physical contact area between the two to ensure more effective electron injection and charge separation, and to improve the carrier transport efficiency in the device. Multi-band responsive Cs₂AgBiBr₆ double perovskite photodetectors based on TiO₂ nanopillars are excited at multiple wavelengths of 365 nm and 405 nm with high light response and good stability and reproducibility, resulting in average switching ratios of 522 and 2090, respectively. When the light source is excited at 365 nm and 405 nm with a light intensity of 0.056 W/cm², the responsivity is 0.019 A/W and 0.057 A/W, respectively, and the specific detectivity is 1.9 × 10¹⁰ Jones and 5.6 × 10¹⁰ Jones, respectively. Comparing with the Cs₂AgBiBr₆ perovskite photodetector based on a planar TiO₂ electron transport layer, the average switching ratios are improved by a factor of 65 and 110, the responsivities are improved by 35% and 256%, and the specific detectivity are improved by a factor of 6.9 and 25, respectively. In this work, the photoelectric performance of Cs₂AgBiBr₆ photodetector is improved by using TiO₂ nanopillars as an electron transport layer. It provides a reference solution for developing high-performance Cs₂AgBiBr₆ perovskite photodetectors in future.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Precision Navigation Technology and Application, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China

Corresponding author: Chen Zan-Hui, zhchen@guet.edu.cn ; Zhang Fa-Bi, zhangfabi@outlook.com

Funds: Project supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi, China (Grant No. GuiKe AD23026253), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52262022, 62205080), the Key Laboratory of Precision Navigation Technology and Application of Guangxi Province, China (Grant Nos. DH202202, DH202302), and the Key Laboratory of Brain-Like Computing and Intelligent Chip Open Fund Project of Guangxi Province, China (Grant No. BCIC-23-K6).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Li Z Q, Yan T T, Fang X S 2023 Nat. Rev. Mater. 8 587 Google Scholar
[2]	Arya S, Mahajan P, Gupta R, et al. 2020 Prog. Solid State Chem. 60 100286 Google Scholar
[3]	Chen Y H, Feng Z J, Pal A, Zhang J C 2022 Phys. Status Solidi A-Appl. Mat. 219 2200018 Google Scholar
[4]	Chouhan L, Ghimire S, Subrahmanyam C, Miyasaka T, Biju V 2020 Chem. Soc. Rev. 49 2869 Google Scholar
[5]	Li H Y, Shen N, Chen S, Guo F, Xu B M 2023 Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 32 Google Scholar
[6]	郤育莺, 韩悦, 李国辉, 翟爱平, 冀婷, 郝玉英, 崔艳霞 2020 物理学报 69 167804 Google Scholar Xi Y Y, Han Y, Li G H, Zhai A P, Ji T, Hao Y Y, Cui Y X 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 167804 Google Scholar
[7]	Jeong B, Han H, Park C 2020 Adv. Mater. 32 35 Google Scholar
[8]	Priyadarshini P, Senapati S, Naik R 2023 Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 186 39 Google Scholar
[9]	Wang Y X, Zhao H R, Piotrowski M, et al. 2022 Micromachines 13 28 Google Scholar
[10]	Shamsi J, Urban A S, Imran M, De Trizio L, Manna L 2019 Chem. Rev. 119 3296 Google Scholar
[11]	Chang Z Z, Lu Z J, Deng W, Shi Y D, Sun Y Y, Zhang X J, Jie J S 2023 Nanoscale 15 5053 Google Scholar
[12]	Chang Z Z, Deng W, Ren X B, Liu X Y, Luo G, Tan Y, Zhang X J, Jie J S 2023 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15 32037 Google Scholar
[13]	王俪璇, 李仁杰, 刘辉, 王鹏阳, 石标, 赵颖, 张晓丹 2021 物理学报 70 118402 Google Scholar Wang L X, Li R J, Liu H, Wang P Y, Shi B A, Zhao Y, Zhang X D 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 118402 Google Scholar
[14]	Nazir G, Lee S Y, Lee J H, Rehman A, Lee J K, Il Seok S, Park S J 2022 Adv. Mater. 34 45 Google Scholar
[15]	Yan X B, Zhao Y, Cao G, Li X Y, Gao C, Liu L, Ahmed S, Altaf F, Tan H, Ma X P, Xie Z J, Zhang H 2023 Adv. Sci. 10 55 Google Scholar
[16]	Ghosh S, Pradhan B 2019 Chem. Nano. Mat. 5 300 Google Scholar
[17]	Yan Y J, Pullerits T, Zheng K B, Liang Z Q 2020 ACS Energy Lett. 5 2052 Google Scholar
[18]	Gao Z Y, Mao G Y, Chen S Y, Bai Y, Gao P, Wu C C, Gates I D, Yang W J, Ding X L, Yao J X 2022 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24 3460 Google Scholar
[19]	Ikram M, Malik R, Raees R, Imran M, Wang F, Ali S, Khan M, Khan Q, Maqbool M 2022 Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 53 16 Google Scholar
[20]	Supatutkul C, Sitarachu K, Laosiritaworn Y, Jaroenjittichai A P 2023 Mater. Today Commun. 36 7 Google Scholar
[21]	Igbari F, Xu F F, Shao J Y, Ud-Din F, Siffalovic P, Zhong Y W 2023 Sol. RRL 7 28 Google Scholar
[22]	Chen X, Jia M C, Xu W, Pan G C, Zhu J Y, Tian Y T, Wu D, Li X J, Shi Z F 2023 Adv. Opt. Mater. 11 48 Google Scholar
[23]	Dipta S S, Uddin A, Conibeer G 2022 Heliyon 8 12 Google Scholar
[24]	Peng Y Y, Jiang D Y, Zhao M, Duan Y H, Wei H M, Li H D, Liang Q C, Wang S W 2023 J. Alloy. Compd. 965 8 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhen C, Wu T T, Chen R Z, Wang L Z, Liu G, Cheng H M 2019 ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7 4586 Google Scholar
[26]	Yuan Y, Ji Z, Yan G H, et al. 2021 J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 75 39 Google Scholar
[27]	Sun P, Qu G P, Hu Q K, Ma Y C, Liu H S, Xu Z X, Huang Z F 2022 ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 5 3568 Google Scholar
[28]	Manjunath V, Bimli S, Shaikh P A, Ogale S B, Devan R S 2022 J. Mater. Chem. C 10 15725 Google Scholar
[29]	Chen C, Zheng S J, Song H W 2021 Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 7250 Google Scholar
[30]	Xiao B, Tan Y, Yi Z J, Luo Y B, Jiang Q H, Yang J Y 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 37027 Google Scholar
[31]	Qin K, Dun G H, Li Y Y, et al. 2023 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15 37640 Google Scholar
[32]	Slavney A H, Hu T, Lindenberg A M, Karunadasa H I 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 2138 Google Scholar
[33]	Djokic V R, Marinkovic A D, Petrovic R D, Ersen O, Zafeiratos S, Mitric M, Ophus C, Radmilovic V R, Janackovic D T 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 33058 Google Scholar
[34]	Xiao T, Zhao J, Sun P, Li P, Zhang Y K, Zhao N, Ren Z W, Li G, Huang Z F, Zheng Z J 2021 Small 17 10 Google Scholar
[35]	Pan B K, Gu J H, Xu X L, Xiao L B, Zhao J, Zou G F 2021 Nano Res. 14 3431 Google Scholar
[36]	Cen G B, Sheng H G, Wang Z X, Yi L, Sun H C, An Y P, Zhao C X, Mai W J 2023 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 652 34 Google Scholar
[37]	Jubu P R, Yam F K, Igba V M, Beh K P 2020 J. Solid State Chem. 290 121576 Google Scholar
[38]	Zhang Z Y, Sun Q D, Lu Y, Lu F, Mu X L, Wei S H, Sui M L 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 12 Google Scholar
[39]	Igbari F, Wang R, Wang Z K, Ma X J, Wang Q, Wang K L, Zhang Y, Liao L S, Yang Y 2019 Nano Lett. 19 2066 Google Scholar
[40]	Vu N H, Le H V, Cao T M, Pham V V, Le H M, Duc N M 2012 J. Phys. Condes. Matter 24 405501 Google Scholar
[41]	Dharmale N, Chaudhury S, Kar J 2021 ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 10 10 Google Scholar
[42]	Lal M, Sharma P, Ram C 2021 Optik 241 14 Google Scholar
[43]	Shen W H, Jung U, Xian Z P, Jung B, Park J 2022 J. Alloy. Compd. 929 167329 Google Scholar
[44]	Wang C, Zhao F Z, Zhou Z Y, Li X X, He S L, Zhang M L, Zhang D Y, Zhang L C 2022 J. Alloy. Compd. 905 164245 Google Scholar
[45]	胡紫婷, 舒鑫, 王香, 李跃, 徐闰, 洪峰, 马忠权, 蒋最敏, 徐飞 2022 物理学报 71 116801 Google Scholar Hu Z T, Shu X, Wang X, Li Y, Xu R, Hong F, Ma Z Q, Jiang Z M, Xu F 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 116801 Google Scholar
[46]	Li T, Wang J, Gao Z Y, Lü P, Yang Y B, Wu J S, Hong J W, Wang X Y, Zhou Y W 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 131103 Google Scholar
[47]	Dang Y Y, Tong G Q, Song W T, Liu Z H, Qiu L B, Ono L K, Qi Y B 2020 J. Mater. Chem. C 8 276 Google Scholar
[48]	Wu C C, Du B W, Luo W, et al. 2018 Adv. Opt. Mater. 6 1800811 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs光电探测器制备工艺　(a) TiO₂SL的形成; (b) TiO₂ NPs的生长; (c) 前驱体溶液和基底的预热处理; (d) 旋涂法沉积Cs₂AgBiBr₆薄膜; (e) 低压辅助处理; (f) 退火处理; (g) 热蒸镀沉积Au电极; (h) 钙钛矿光电探测器三维结构示意图

Figure 1. Preparation process of Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs photodetectors: (a) Formation of TiO₂ SL; (b) growth of TiO₂ NPs; (c) preheating treatment of precursor solution and substrate; (d) spin-coating method for deposition of Cs₂AgBiBr₆ thin film; (e) low pressure auxiliary treatment; (f) annealing treatment; (g) thermal vapour deposition of Au electrodes; (h) schematic diagram of three-dimensional structure of perovskite photodetectors.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 (a), (b) Cs₂AgBiBr₆/FTO器件表面和截面的SEM图; (c), (d) Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO器件表面和截面的SEM图

Figure 2. (a), (b) SEM of the surface and cross-section of the Cs₂AgBiBr₆/FTO device, respectively; (c), (d) SEM of the surface and cross-section of the Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO device, respectively.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 Cs₂AgBiBr₆层和Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs层的XRD图, 其中Cs₂AgBiBr₆的模拟XRD图由参考文献[32]获得

Figure 3. XRD patterns of the Cs₂AgBiBr₆ layer and the Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs layer, where the simulated XRD patterns of Cs₂AgBiBr₆ were obtained from Ref. [32].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 (a) Cs₂AgBiBr₆/FTO, TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO和Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO器件的紫外-可见吸收光谱图; (b) Cs₂AgBiBr₆/FTO, Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO器件的稳态PL光谱图; (c), (d) 分别为Cs₂AgBiBr₆和TiO₂的Tauc图

Figure 5. (a) UV-vis absorption spectra of Cs₂AgBiBr₆/FTO, TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO and Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO devices; (b) steady-state PL spectra of Cs₂AgBiBr₆/FTO, Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO devices; (c), (d) Tauc plots for Cs₂AgBiBr₆ and TiO₂, respectively.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs钙钛矿光电探测器在光照条件下的工作机制图

Figure 4. Mechanism of operation of Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs perovskite photodetectors in light conditions.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO器件在黑暗条件下所获暗电流值以及被365 nm和405 nm波长光源以不同光功率激发所得光电流值对比　(a) 0.31 W/cm²; (b) 0.152 W/cm²; (c) 0.094 W/cm²; (d) 0.056 W/cm²

Figure 6. Comparison of the dark current values obtained by the Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO device under dark conditions and the photocurrent values obtained by being excited by 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength light sources at different optical power: (a) 0.31 W/cm²; (b) 0.152 W/cm²; (c) 0.094 W/cm²; (d) 0.056 W/cm².

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO光电探测器的时域光响应电流(偏压: 0 V、入射光强度: 0.31 W/cm²)　(a), (b) 分别为365 nm和405 nm波长光源(开/关)激发的循环I-T曲线图; (c), (d) 分别为365 nm和405 nm波长光源激发的单循环I-T曲线图

Figure 7. Time-domain optical response current of the Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO photodetector (Bias voltage: 0 V, incident light intensity: 0.31 W/cm²): (a), (b) Cyclic I-T curves for the excitation of light source (on/off) at 365 and 405 nm wavelengths, respectively; (c), (d) single-cycle I-T curves for the excitation of light source at 365 and 405 nm wavelengths, respectively.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL/FTO光电探测器的SEM图　(a)表面; (b)截面

Figure 8. SEM images of Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL/FTO photodetector: (a) Surface section; (b) cross section.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO光电探测器与Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL/FTO光电探测器性能指标对比　(a), (b)分别为365 nm和405 nm波长光源以不同光强激发两种器件所获光电流对比以及在黑暗条件下所获暗电流对比; (c), (d)分别为365 nm和405 nm波长光源激发两种器件所获响应度随着入射光强变化的曲线图; (e), (f)分别为365 nm和405 nm波长光源激发两种器件所获比探测率随入射光强变化的曲线图

Figure 9. Comparison of the performance indexes of Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs/FTO photodetectors and Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL/FTO photodetectors: (a), (b) Comparison of photocurrents obtained by exciting the two devices with different light intensities at 365 nm and 405 nm wavelengths, respectively, and the comparison of dark currents obtained under dark conditions; (c), (d) plots of the variation of the responsivity with the incident light intensity obtained by exciting the two devices with 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength light sources, respectively; (e), (f) plots of specific detectivity versus incident light intensity for two devices excited by 365 nm and 405 nm wavelength sources, respectively.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 Cs₂AgBiBr₆基光电探测器的光响应性能比较

Table 1. Comparison of photoresponse performance of Cs₂AgBiBr₆-based photodetectors.

Device structure	Measurement conditions	Responsivity/(A·W^–1)	D^*/(10⁹ Jones)	Ref.
ITO/Cs₂AgBiBr₆ single crystal/ITO	1 V, 460 nm	4 × 10^–5	20	[46]
Ag/Cs₂AgBiBr₆ single crystal	5 V, 400 nm	0.92	1.38	[47]
Cs₂AgBiBr₆/SnO₂/ZnO NRs	405 nm	0.608	29.7	[43]
Cs₂AgBiBr₆/SnO₂	350 nm	0.11	21	[48]
Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL	–3 V, 405 nm	0.016	2.1	This work
Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL	–3 V, 365 nm	0.014	2.4	This work
Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs	–3 V, 405 nm	0.057	56	This work
Cs₂AgBiBr₆/TiO₂ SL@NPs	–3 V, 365 nm	0.019	19	This work

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Li Z Q, Yan T T, Fang X S 2023 Nat. Rev. Mater. 8 587 Google Scholar
[2]	Arya S, Mahajan P, Gupta R, et al. 2020 Prog. Solid State Chem. 60 100286 Google Scholar
[3]	Chen Y H, Feng Z J, Pal A, Zhang J C 2022 Phys. Status Solidi A-Appl. Mat. 219 2200018 Google Scholar
[4]	Chouhan L, Ghimire S, Subrahmanyam C, Miyasaka T, Biju V 2020 Chem. Soc. Rev. 49 2869 Google Scholar
[5]	Li H Y, Shen N, Chen S, Guo F, Xu B M 2023 Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 32 Google Scholar
[6]	郤育莺, 韩悦, 李国辉, 翟爱平, 冀婷, 郝玉英, 崔艳霞 2020 物理学报 69 167804 Google Scholar Xi Y Y, Han Y, Li G H, Zhai A P, Ji T, Hao Y Y, Cui Y X 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 167804 Google Scholar
[7]	Jeong B, Han H, Park C 2020 Adv. Mater. 32 35 Google Scholar
[8]	Priyadarshini P, Senapati S, Naik R 2023 Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 186 39 Google Scholar
[9]	Wang Y X, Zhao H R, Piotrowski M, et al. 2022 Micromachines 13 28 Google Scholar
[10]	Shamsi J, Urban A S, Imran M, De Trizio L, Manna L 2019 Chem. Rev. 119 3296 Google Scholar
[11]	Chang Z Z, Lu Z J, Deng W, Shi Y D, Sun Y Y, Zhang X J, Jie J S 2023 Nanoscale 15 5053 Google Scholar
[12]	Chang Z Z, Deng W, Ren X B, Liu X Y, Luo G, Tan Y, Zhang X J, Jie J S 2023 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15 32037 Google Scholar
[13]	王俪璇, 李仁杰, 刘辉, 王鹏阳, 石标, 赵颖, 张晓丹 2021 物理学报 70 118402 Google Scholar Wang L X, Li R J, Liu H, Wang P Y, Shi B A, Zhao Y, Zhang X D 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 118402 Google Scholar
[14]	Nazir G, Lee S Y, Lee J H, Rehman A, Lee J K, Il Seok S, Park S J 2022 Adv. Mater. 34 45 Google Scholar
[15]	Yan X B, Zhao Y, Cao G, Li X Y, Gao C, Liu L, Ahmed S, Altaf F, Tan H, Ma X P, Xie Z J, Zhang H 2023 Adv. Sci. 10 55 Google Scholar
[16]	Ghosh S, Pradhan B 2019 Chem. Nano. Mat. 5 300 Google Scholar
[17]	Yan Y J, Pullerits T, Zheng K B, Liang Z Q 2020 ACS Energy Lett. 5 2052 Google Scholar
[18]	Gao Z Y, Mao G Y, Chen S Y, Bai Y, Gao P, Wu C C, Gates I D, Yang W J, Ding X L, Yao J X 2022 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24 3460 Google Scholar
[19]	Ikram M, Malik R, Raees R, Imran M, Wang F, Ali S, Khan M, Khan Q, Maqbool M 2022 Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 53 16 Google Scholar
[20]	Supatutkul C, Sitarachu K, Laosiritaworn Y, Jaroenjittichai A P 2023 Mater. Today Commun. 36 7 Google Scholar
[21]	Igbari F, Xu F F, Shao J Y, Ud-Din F, Siffalovic P, Zhong Y W 2023 Sol. RRL 7 28 Google Scholar
[22]	Chen X, Jia M C, Xu W, Pan G C, Zhu J Y, Tian Y T, Wu D, Li X J, Shi Z F 2023 Adv. Opt. Mater. 11 48 Google Scholar
[23]	Dipta S S, Uddin A, Conibeer G 2022 Heliyon 8 12 Google Scholar
[24]	Peng Y Y, Jiang D Y, Zhao M, Duan Y H, Wei H M, Li H D, Liang Q C, Wang S W 2023 J. Alloy. Compd. 965 8 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhen C, Wu T T, Chen R Z, Wang L Z, Liu G, Cheng H M 2019 ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7 4586 Google Scholar
[26]	Yuan Y, Ji Z, Yan G H, et al. 2021 J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 75 39 Google Scholar
[27]	Sun P, Qu G P, Hu Q K, Ma Y C, Liu H S, Xu Z X, Huang Z F 2022 ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 5 3568 Google Scholar
[28]	Manjunath V, Bimli S, Shaikh P A, Ogale S B, Devan R S 2022 J. Mater. Chem. C 10 15725 Google Scholar
[29]	Chen C, Zheng S J, Song H W 2021 Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 7250 Google Scholar
[30]	Xiao B, Tan Y, Yi Z J, Luo Y B, Jiang Q H, Yang J Y 2021 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 37027 Google Scholar
[31]	Qin K, Dun G H, Li Y Y, et al. 2023 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15 37640 Google Scholar
[32]	Slavney A H, Hu T, Lindenberg A M, Karunadasa H I 2016 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 2138 Google Scholar
[33]	Djokic V R, Marinkovic A D, Petrovic R D, Ersen O, Zafeiratos S, Mitric M, Ophus C, Radmilovic V R, Janackovic D T 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 33058 Google Scholar
[34]	Xiao T, Zhao J, Sun P, Li P, Zhang Y K, Zhao N, Ren Z W, Li G, Huang Z F, Zheng Z J 2021 Small 17 10 Google Scholar
[35]	Pan B K, Gu J H, Xu X L, Xiao L B, Zhao J, Zou G F 2021 Nano Res. 14 3431 Google Scholar
[36]	Cen G B, Sheng H G, Wang Z X, Yi L, Sun H C, An Y P, Zhao C X, Mai W J 2023 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 652 34 Google Scholar
[37]	Jubu P R, Yam F K, Igba V M, Beh K P 2020 J. Solid State Chem. 290 121576 Google Scholar
[38]	Zhang Z Y, Sun Q D, Lu Y, Lu F, Mu X L, Wei S H, Sui M L 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 12 Google Scholar
[39]	Igbari F, Wang R, Wang Z K, Ma X J, Wang Q, Wang K L, Zhang Y, Liao L S, Yang Y 2019 Nano Lett. 19 2066 Google Scholar
[40]	Vu N H, Le H V, Cao T M, Pham V V, Le H M, Duc N M 2012 J. Phys. Condes. Matter 24 405501 Google Scholar
[41]	Dharmale N, Chaudhury S, Kar J 2021 ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 10 10 Google Scholar
[42]	Lal M, Sharma P, Ram C 2021 Optik 241 14 Google Scholar
[43]	Shen W H, Jung U, Xian Z P, Jung B, Park J 2022 J. Alloy. Compd. 929 167329 Google Scholar
[44]	Wang C, Zhao F Z, Zhou Z Y, Li X X, He S L, Zhang M L, Zhang D Y, Zhang L C 2022 J. Alloy. Compd. 905 164245 Google Scholar
[45]	胡紫婷, 舒鑫, 王香, 李跃, 徐闰, 洪峰, 马忠权, 蒋最敏, 徐飞 2022 物理学报 71 116801 Google Scholar Hu Z T, Shu X, Wang X, Li Y, Xu R, Hong F, Ma Z Q, Jiang Z M, Xu F 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 116801 Google Scholar
[46]	Li T, Wang J, Gao Z Y, Lü P, Yang Y B, Wu J S, Hong J W, Wang X Y, Zhou Y W 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 131103 Google Scholar
[47]	Dang Y Y, Tong G Q, Song W T, Liu Z H, Qiu L B, Ono L K, Qi Y B 2020 J. Mater. Chem. C 8 276 Google Scholar
[48]	Wu C C, Du B W, Luo W, et al. 2018 Adv. Opt. Mater. 6 1800811 Google Scholar

[1]	Wang Ai-Wei, Zhu Lu-Ping, Shan Yan-Su, Liu Peng, Cao Xue-Lei, Cao Bing-Qiang. High-performance CsSnBr₃/Si PN heterojunction photodetectors prepared by pulsed laser deposition epitaxy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(5): 058503. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231645
[2]	Su Ran, Xi Zhao-Ying, Li Shan, Zhang Jia-Han, Jiang Ming-Ming, Liu Zeng, Tang Wei-Hua. Self-powered solar-blind ultraviolet photoelectric detector based on GaSe/β-Ga₂O₃ heterojunction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 0(0): . doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240267
[3]	Zhang Mao-Lin, Ma Wan-Yu, Wang Lei, Liu Zeng, Yang Li-Li, Li Shan, Tang Wei-Hua, Guo Yu-Feng. Investigation of high-temperature performance of WO₃/β-Ga₂O₃ heterojunction deep-ultraviolet photodetectors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(16): 160201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230638
[4]	Wang Wan-Yu, Shi Kai-Xi, Li Jin-Hua, Chu Xue-Ying, Fang Xuan, Kuang Shang-Qi, Xu Guo-Hua. Effect of MoO₃-overlayer on MoS₂-based photovoltaic photodetector performance. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(14): 147301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230464
[5]	Wu Peng, Tan Lun, Li Wei, Cao Li-Wei, Zhao Jun-Bo, Qu Yao, Li Ang. Preparation and photoelectric property of large scale monolayer MoS₂. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(11): 118101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230273
[6]	Liu Xiao-Xuan, Sun Fei-Yang, Wu Ying, Yang Sheng-Yi, Zou Bing-Suo. Research progress of silicon nanowires array photodetectors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(6): 068501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222303
[7]	Zhao Ji-Yu, Tan Qiu-Hong, Liu Lei, Yang Wei-Ye, Wang Qian-Jin, Liu Ying-Kai. High-performance photodetectors based on Au nanoislands decorated CdSSe nanobelt. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(9): 098103. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222021
[8]	Fu Qun-Dong, Wang Xiao-Wei, Zhou Xiu-Xian, Zhu Chao, Liu Zheng. Synthesis of two-dimensional Bi₂O₂Se on silicon substrate by chemical vapor deposition and its photoelectric detection application. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(16): 166101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220388
[9]	Hu Zi-Ting, Shu Xin, Wang Xiang, Li Yue, Xu Run, Hong Feng, Ma Zhong-Quan, Jiang Zui-Min, Xu Fei. Air-stable CsPbIBr₂ photodetector via dual-ligand-assisted solution strategy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(11): 116801. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212143
[10]	Shu Yan-Tao, Zhang You-Wei, Wang Shun. Photodetectors based on homojunctions of transition metal dichalcogenides. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(17): 177301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210859
[11]	Zhao Yi-Mo, Huang Zhi-Wei, Peng Ren-Miao, Xu Peng-Peng, Wu Qiang, Mao Yi-Chen, Yu Chun-Yu, Huang Wei, Wang Jian-Yuan, Chen Song-Yan, Li Cheng. Indium tin oxid/germanium Schottky photodetectors modulated by ultra-thin dielectric intercalation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(17): 178506. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210138
[12]	Li Dan-Yang, Han Xu, Xu Guang-Yuan, Liu Xiao, Zhao Xiao-Jun, Li Geng-Wei, Hao Hui-Ying, Dong Jing-Jing, Liu Hao, Xing Jie. Bi₂O₂Se photoconductive detector with low power consumption and high sensitivity. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(24): 248502. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201044
[13]	Meng Xian-Cheng, Tian He, An Xia, Yuan Shuo, Fan Chao, Wang Meng-Jun, Zheng Hong-Xing. Field effect transistor photodetector based on two dimensional SnSe₂. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(13): 137801. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191960
[14]	An Tao, Tu Chuan-Bao, Gong Wei. Organic color photodetectors based on tri-phase bulk heterojunction with wide sectrum and photoelectronic mltiplication. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(19): 198503. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180502
[15]	Zheng Jia-Jin, Wang Ya-Ru, Yu Ke-Han, Xu Xiang-Xing, Sheng Xue-Xi, Hu Er-Tao, Wei Wei. Field effect transistor photodetector based on graphene and perovskite quantum dots. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(11): 118502. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180129
[16]	Ren Lun, Li Kui-Ying, Cui Jie-Yuan, Zhao Jie. Photoelectron characteristics of ZnSe quantum dots-sensitized mesoporous La-doped nano-TiO2 film. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(6): 067301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.067301
[17]	Wang Chen, Xu Yi-Hong, Li Cheng, Lin Hai-Jun. Fabrication and characteristics of high performance SOI-based Ge PIN waveguide photodetector. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(19): 198502. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.198502
[18]	Yin Wei-Hong, Han Qin, Yang Xiao-Hong. The progress of semiconductor photoelectric devices based on graphene. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(24): 248502. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.248502
[19]	Guo Jian-Chuan, Zuo Yu-Hua, Zhang Yun, Zhang Ling-Zi, Cheng Bu-Wen, Wang Qi-Ming. Theoretical analysis and experimental study of the space-charge-screening effect in uni-traveling-carrier photodiode. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(7): 4524-4529. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4524
[20]	CHEN CHANG-HONG, YI XIN-JIAN, XIONG BI-FENG. INFRARED RESPONSIVITY OF UNCOOLED VO2-BASED THIN FILMS BOLOMETER. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(3): 450-452. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.450

Catalog

Vol. 73, Issue 7 - 2024-04-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 544
PDF Downloads: 31
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板

Multi-band response Cs₂AgBiBr₆ double perovskite photodetector based on TiO₂ nanopillars

Abstract

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Chen Zan-Hui, zhchen@guet.edu.cn ; Zhang Fa-Bi, zhangfabi@outlook.com

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

Cited By

Catalog

Metrics

Authors

Referees

About Journal

About

Search

Article

留言板