-
In quantum optical experiments, the polarizabilities of atomic systems play a very important role, which can be used to describe the interactions of atomic systems with external electromagnetic fields. When subjected to a specific electric field such as a laser field with a particular frequency, the frequency-dependent electric-dipole (E1) dynamic polarizability of an atomic state can reach zero. The wavelength corresponding to such a frequency is referred to as the “turn-out” wavelength. In this paper, the “Turn-out” wavelengths for the 3s2 1S0 and 3s3p 3P0 clock states of Al+ are calculated by using the configuration interaction plus many-body perturbation theory (CI+MBPT) method. The energies and E1 reduced matrix elements of low-lying states of Al+ are calculated. By combining these E1 reduced matrix elements with the experimental energies, the E1 dynamic polarizabilities of the 3s2 1S0 and 3s3p 3P0 clock states are determined in the angular frequency range of (0 ,0.42a.u. ) . The “turn-out” wavelengths are found at the zero-crossing points of the frequency-dependent dynamic polarizability curves for both the 3s2 1S0 and 3s3p 3P0 clock states. For the ground state 3s2 1S0, a single “turn-out” wavelength at 266.994(1) nm is observed. On the other hand, the excited state 3s3p 3P0 exhibits four distinct “turn-out” wavelengths at 184.56(1) nm, 174.433(1) nm, 121.52(2) nm, and 119.71(2) nm. The contributions of individual resonant transitions to the dynamic polarizabilities at the “turn-out” wavelengths are examined. It is observed that the resonant lines situated near a certain “turn-out” wavelength can provide dominant contributions to the polarizability, while the remaining resonant lines generally contribute minimally. Upon analyzing these data, we recommend precise measurement of these “turn-out” wavelengths to accurately determine the oscillator strengths or reduced matrix elements of the relevant transitions. This is crucial for minimizing the uncertainty of the blackbody radiation (BBR) frequency shift in Al+ optical clock and suppressing the systematic uncertainty. Meanwhile, precisely measuring these “turn-out” wavelengths is also helpful for further exploring the atomic structure of Al+.
-
Keywords:
- Al+ /
- polarizability /
- “Tune-out” wavelengths /
- CI+MBPT
-
[1] Chaudhuri R K, Das B P, Freed K F 1998 J. Chem. Phys. 108 2556
[2] Dong H, Jiang J, Wu Z W, Dong C Z, Gaigalas G 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 043103
[3] Zhang T X, Li J G, Liu J P 2018 Acta. Phys. Sin. 67 053101 (in Chinese ) [张婷贤， 李冀光， 刘建鹏 2018 物理学报 67 053101]
[4] Brewer S M, Chen J S, Hankin A M, Clements E R, Chou C W, Wineland D J, Hume D B, Leibrandt D R 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 033201
[5] Cui K F, Chao S J, Sun C L, Wang S M, Zhang P, Wei Y F, Yuan J B, Cao J, Shu H L, Huang X R 2022 Eur. Phys. J. D 76 140
[6] Keller J, Burgermeister T, Kalincev D, Didier A, Kulosa A P, Nordmann T, Kiethe J, Mehlstäubler T E 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 013405
[7] Mitroy J, Safronova M S, Clark C W 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 202001
[8] Kar S, Wang Y S, Wang Y, Ho Y K 2018 Can. J. Phys. 96 633
[9] Cheng Y J, Jiang J, Mitroy J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 022511[10] Jiang J, Tang L Y, Mitroy J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 032518
[10] Yu W W, Yu R M, Cheng Y J 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 123102
[11] Yu W W, Yu R M, Cheng Y J, Zhou Y J 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 023101
[12] Safronova M S, Zuhrianda Z, Safronova U I, Clark C W 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 040501(R)
[13] Holmgren W F, Trubko R, Hromada I, Cronin A D 2012 Phys. Rev. lett. 109 243004
[14] Herold C D, Vaidya V D, Li X, Rolston S L, Porto J V, Safronova M S 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 243003
[15] Reader J, Acquista N, Sansonetti C J, Sansonetti J E 1990 Astrophys. J. Suppl.Ser.72 831
[16] Samain D 1995 Astron. Astrophys.Suppl.Ser. 113 237
[17] Morton D C 1991 Astrophys. J. Suppl.Ser. 77 119
[18] Safronova M S, Kozlov M G, Clark C W 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 143006
[19] Tang Z M, Yu Y M, Jiang J, Dong C Z 2018 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51 125002
[20] Wu L, Wang Xia, Wang T, Jiang J, Dong C Z 2023 New J. Phys. 25 043011
[21] Dzuba V A, Flambaum V V, Kozlov M G 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 3948
[22] Kozlov M G, Porsev S G, Safronova M S, Tupitsyn I I 2015 Comput. Phys. Commun. 195 199
[23] Tang Z M, Yu Y M, Dong C Z 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 063101
[24] Kramida A, Ralchenko Yu, Reader J and NIST ASD Team 2020 NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.8) [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
[25] Kumar R, Chattopadhyay S, Angom D, Mani B K 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 022801
[26] Mitroy J, Zhang J Y, Bromley M W J, Rollin R G 2009 Eur. Phys. J. D 53 15
[27] Johnson W R, Safronova M S, Safronova U I 1997 Phys. Scr. 56, 252
[28] Stanek M, Glowacki L, Migdalek J 1996 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29 2985
[29] Das B P, Idrees M 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42 6900
[30] Fischer C F 2009 Phys. Scr. T134 014019
[31] Ekman J, Godefroid M R and Hartman H 2014 Atoms 2 215
计量
- 文章访问数: 199
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
