Dissociation of chlorobromomethane molecules coherently controlled by ultrafast strong field

Jing Wen-Quan; Jia Li-Juan; Sun Zhao-Peng; Zhao Song-Feng; Shu Chuan-Cun

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20241401

Abstract

Coherent control of molecular dissociation in ultrafast strong fields has received considerable attention in various scientific disciplines, such as atomic and molecular physics, physical chemistry, and quantum control. Many fundamental issues still exist regarding the understanding of phenomena, exploration of mechanisms, and development of control strategies. Recent progress has shown that manipulating the spectral phase distribution of a single ultrafast strong ultraviolet laser pulse while maintaining the same spectral amplitude distribution can effectively control the total dissociation probability and branching ratio of molecules initially in the ground state. In this work, the spectral phase control of the photodissociation reaction of chlorobromomethane (CH₂BrCl) is studied in depth by using a time-dependent quantum wave packet method, focusing on the influence of the initial vibrational state on the dissociation reaction. The results show that modifying the spectral phase of a single ultrafast pulse does not influence the total dissociation probability or branching ratio in the weak field limit. However, these factors exhibit significant dependence on the spectral phase of the single ultrafast pulse in the strong field limit. By analyzing the population distribution of vibrational states in the ground electronic state, we observe that chirped pulses can effectively control the resonance Raman scattering (RRS) phenomenon induced in strong fields, thereby selectively affecting the dissociation probability and branching ratio based on initial vibrational states. Furthermore, we demonstrate that by selecting an appropriate initial vibration state and controlling both the value and sign of the chirp rate, it is possible to achieve preferential cleavage of Cl+CH₂Br bonds. This study provides new insights into understanding of ultrafast coherent control of photodissociation reactions in polyatomic molecules.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
Hunan Key Laboratory of Super Microstructure and Ultrafast Process, School of Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Atomic and Molecular Physics and Functional Materials of Gansu Province, College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
3.
Institute of Theoretical Physics, School of Physics and Optoelectric Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China

Corresponding author: Zhao Song-Feng, zhaosf@nwnu.edu.cn ; Shu Chuan-Cun, cc.shu@csu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFA1604204), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12164044, 12274470, 61973317), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province for Distinguished Young Scholars, China (Grant No. 2022JJ10070).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Mokhtari A, Cong P, Herek J, Zewail A 1990 Nature 348 225 Google Scholar
[2]	Brumer P, Shapiro M 1992 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 43 257 Google Scholar
[3]	King W E, Campbell G H, Frank A, Reed B, Schmerge J F, Siwick B J, Stuart B C, Weber P M 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 111101 Google Scholar
[4]	Sun Z, Wang C, Zhao W, Yang C 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 149 224307 Google Scholar
[5]	Yang J, Zhu X, Wolf T J, Li Z, Nunes J P F, Coffee R, Cryan J P, Gühr M, Hegazy K, Heinz T F, Jobe K, Li R, Shen X, Veccione T, Weathersby S, Wilkin K J, Yoneda C, Zheng Q, Martinez T J, Centurion M, Wang X 2018 Science 361 64 Google Scholar
[6]	Sun Z, Liu Y 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 17397 Google Scholar
[7]	Rubio-Lago L, Chicharro D V, Poullain S M, Zanchet A, Koumarianou G, Glodic P, Samartzis P C, García-Vela A, Bañares L 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 11684 Google Scholar
[8]	Kranabetter L, Kristensen H H, Ghazaryan A, Schouder C A, Chatterley A S, Janssen P, Jensen F, Zillich R E, Lemeshko M, Stapelfeldt H 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 053201 Google Scholar
[9]	Lian Z, Hu Z, Qi H, Fei D, Luo S, Chen Z, Shu C C 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 053105 Google Scholar
[10]	Xu S, Lian Z, Hong Q Q, Wang L, Chen H, Huang Y, Shu C C 2024 Phys. Rev. A 110 023116 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhang H, Lavorel B, Billard F, Hartmann J M, Hertz E, Faucher O, Ma J, Wu J, Gershnabel E, Prior Y, Averbukh I S 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 193401 Google Scholar
[12]	Hong Q Q, Fan L B, Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 013108 Google Scholar
[13]	Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 013408 Google Scholar
[14]	Hong Q Q, Lian Z Z, Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 32763 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhang W, Gong X, Li H, Lu P, Sun F, Ji Q, Lin K, Ma J, Li H, Qiang J, He F, Wu J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 757 Google Scholar
[16]	Lu P, Wang J, Li H, Lin K, Gong X, Song Q, Ji Q, Zhang W, Ma J, Li H, Zeng H, He F, Wu J 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115 2049 Google Scholar
[17]	Guo Z, Fang Y, Ge P, Yu X, Wang J, Han M, Gong Q, Liu Y 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 L051101 Google Scholar
[18]	Yu X, Zhang X, Hu X, Zhao X, Ren D, Li X, Ma P, Wang C, Wu Y, Luo S, Ding D 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 023001 Google Scholar
[19]	Sansone G, Kelkensberg F, Pérez-Torres J, Morales F, Kling M F, Siu W, Ghafur O, Johnsson P, Swoboda M, Benedetti E, Ferrari F, Lépine F, Sanz-Vicario L J, Zherebtsov S, Znakovskaya I, L’Huillier A, Ivanov Y M, Nisoli M, Martín F, Vrakking M J J 2010 Nature 465 763 Google Scholar
[20]	Kang H, Quan W, Wang Y, Lin Z, Wu M, Liu H, Liu X, Wang B B, Liu H J, Gu Y Q, Jia X Y, Liu J, Chen J, Cheng Y 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 203001 Google Scholar
[21]	罗嗣佐, 陈洲, 李孝开, 胡湛, 丁大军 2019 光学学报 39 0126007 Google Scholar Luo S Z, Chen Z, Li X K, Hu Z, Ding D J 2019 Acta Opt. Sin. 39 0126007 Google Scholar
[22]	Li X, Liu Y, Zhang D, He L, Luo S, Shu C C, Ding D 2023 Phys. Rev. A 108 023114 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang W, Yu Z, Gong X, Wang J, Lu P, Li H, Song Q, Ji Q, Lin K, Ma J, Li H, Sun F, Qiang J, Zeng H, He F, Wu J 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 253202 Google Scholar
[24]	Guo Z, Zhang Z, Deng Y, Wang J, Ye D, Liu J, Liu Y 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 143201 Google Scholar
[25]	McFarland B K, Farrell J P, Bucksbaum P H, Guhr M 2008 Science 322 1232 Google Scholar
[26]	Chen Y J, Fu L B, Liu J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 073902 Google Scholar
[27]	Huang Y, Meng C, Wang X, Lü Z, Zhang D, Chen W, Zhao J, Yuan J, Zhao Z 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 123002 Google Scholar
[28]	Yang W, Sheng Z, Feng X, Wu M, Chen Z, Song X 2014 Opt. Express 22 2519 Google Scholar
[29]	He M, Li Y, Zhou Y, Li M, Cao W, Lu P 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 133204 Google Scholar
[30]	Xie W, Yan J, Li M, Cao C, Guo K, Zhou Y, Lu P 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 263202 Google Scholar
[31]	Zewail A H 2000 J. Phys. Chem. A 104 5660 Google Scholar
[32]	Kobayashi Y, Chang K F, Zeng T, Neumark D M, Leone S R 2019 Science 365 79 Google Scholar
[33]	Shu C C, Yuan K J, Dong D, Petersen I R, Bandrauk A D 2017 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8 1 Google Scholar
[34]	Yang D, Cong S L 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 013424 Google Scholar
[35]	Jia Y W, Yuen C, Jing W Q, Zhou Z Y, Lin C, Zhao S F 2024 Phys. Rev. A 110 023112 Google Scholar
[36]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2001 J. Phys. Chem. A 105 2897 Google Scholar
[37]	Csehi A, Halász G J, Cederbaum L S, Vibók Á 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 143 014305 Google Scholar
[38]	Liebel M, Kukura P 2017 Nat. Chem. 9 45 Google Scholar
[39]	Wilma K, Shu C C, Scherf U, Hildner R 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 15329 Google Scholar
[40]	Morichika I, Murata K, Sakurai A, Ishii K, Ashihara S 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 3893 Google Scholar
[41]	Csehi A, Halász G J, Cederbaum L S, Vibók Á 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 074309 Google Scholar
[42]	Tiwari A K, Henriksen N E 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 014306 Google Scholar
[43]	Sun Z, Wang C, Zhao W, Zheng Y, Yang C 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 20957 Google Scholar
[44]	Spanner M, Arango C A, Brumer P 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 133 151101 Google Scholar
[45]	Weigel A, Sebesta A, Kukura P 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 4032 Google Scholar
[46]	Brumer P, Shapiro M 1986 Chem. Phys. Lett. 126 541 Google Scholar
[47]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2003 Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (New York: Wiley
[48]	Garcia-Vela A, Henriksen N E 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 824 Google Scholar
[49]	García-Vela A 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 10346 Google Scholar
[50]	Serrano-Jiménez A, Bañares L, García-Vela A 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 7885 Google Scholar
[51]	Dey D, Henriksen N E 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11 8470 Google Scholar
[52]	Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 164308 Google Scholar
[53]	Tiwari A K, Dey D, Henriksen N E 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 023417 Google Scholar
[54]	Liu Y, Meng J Q, Sun Z, Shu C C 2024 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15 8393 Google Scholar
[55]	García-Vela A 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 153204 Google Scholar
[56]	Abrashkevich D G, Shapiro M, Brumer P 2002 J. Chem. Phys. 116 5584 Google Scholar
[57]	Nichols S R, Weinacht T C, Rozgonyi T, Pearson B J 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 043407 Google Scholar
[58]	Luo S, Zhou S, Hu W, Li X, Ma P, Yu J, Zhu R, Wang C, Liu F, Yan B, Liu A, Yang Y, Guo F, Dajun D 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 063415 Google Scholar
[59]	Esposito V J, Liu T, Wang G, Caracciolo A, Vansco M F, Marchetti B, Karsili T N, Lester M I 2021 J. Phys. Chem. A 125 6571 Google Scholar
[60]	Jing W Q, Sun Z P, Zhao S F, Shu C C 2023 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14 11305 Google Scholar
[61]	Sarma M, Adhikari S, Mishra M K 2008 J. Phys. Chem. A 112 13302 Google Scholar
[62]	Geißler D, Marquetand P, González-Vázquez J, González L, Rozgonyi T, Weinacht T 2012 J. Phys. Chem. A 116 11434 Google Scholar
[63]	Corrales M E, de Nalda R, Bañares L 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1345 Google Scholar
[64]	Bouallagui A, Zanchet A, Bañares L, García-Vela A 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 20365 Google Scholar
[65]	Rozgonyi T, González L 2008 J. Phys. Chem. A 112 5573 Google Scholar
[66]	Shu C C, Rozgonyi T, González L, Henriksen N E 2012 J. Chem. Phys. 136 174303 Google Scholar
[67]	Chicharro D, Marggi Poullain S, González-Vázquez J, Bañares L 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 013945 Google Scholar
[68]	Muthiah B, Kasai T, Lin K C 2021 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23 6098 Google Scholar
[69]	Lanczos C 1950 J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand 45 255 Google Scholar
[70]	Park T J, Light J 1986 J. Chem. Phys. 85 5870 Google Scholar
[71]	Sun Z, Yang C, Zheng Y 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 143 224309 Google Scholar
[72]	Kosloff R 1988 J. Phys. Chem. 92 2087 Google Scholar
[73]	Simpson J R, Roslyak O, Duque J G, Hároz E H, Crochet J J, Telg H, Piryatinski A, Walker A R H, Doorn S K 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 637 Google Scholar
[74]	Guo Y, Shu C C, Dong D, Nori F 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 223202 Google Scholar
[75]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2012 Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (New York: John Wiley & Sons) pp95–152

Cited By

图 1 $ \rm {CH_{2}BrCl} $光解离激光控制示意图　(a)基电子态$ \text{S}_0(\text{a}^{1}\text{A}') $、激发态$ \text{S}_1(\text{a}^{1}\text{A}') $和$ \text{S}_2(\text{a}^{1}\text{A}') $的光解离动力学模型; (b)不同初始振动态$ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $沿着Br—CH₂反应坐标描绘的光解离通道; (c)不同初始振动态$ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $沿Cl—CH₂反应坐标的光解离通道. 其中黑色线、红色线和蓝色线分别表示基电子态$ \text{S}_0(V_0^\text{ad}) $、第一激发电子态$ \text{S}_1(V_1^\text{ad}) $和第二激发电子态$ \text{S}_2(V_2^\text{ad}) $的绝热势能曲线, 红色虚线和黑色虚线分别表示非绝热势能曲线$ V_1^{{\mathrm{di}}} $和$ V_2^{{\mathrm{di}}} $

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of laser control in the photodissociation process of $ \rm {CH_{2}BrCl} $. (a) The model showcasing the photodissociation dynamics involving the ground electronic state $ \text{S}_0(\text{a}^{1}\text{A}') $, as well as the excited adiabatic electronic states $ \text{S}_1(\text{b}^{1}\text{A}') $ and $ \text{S}_2(\text{c}^{1}\text{A}') $. (b) Photodissociation channel along the Br—CH₂ reaction coordinate for different initial vibrational states $ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $. (c) The channel along the Cl—CH₂ reaction coordinate for the same initial states $ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $. The black, red, and blue solid lines represent the adiabatic potential energy curves of ground electronic state $ \text{S}_0(V_0^\text{ad}) $, the first excited electronic state $ \text{S}_1(V_1^\text{ad}) $, and the second excited electronic state $ \text{S}_2(V_2^\text{ad}) $, respectively. Notably, the red-dashed line and the black-dashed line represent the non-adiabatic potential $ V_1^{\mathrm{di}} $ and $ V_2^{\text{di}} $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 CH₂BrCl分子初始振动态为$ |00\rangle $, $ |10\rangle $和$ |20\rangle $时, (a)—(c)基电子态的二维振动本征函数密度分布; (d)—(f)弱场极限下Br+CH₂Cl通道和Cl+CH₂Br通道的含时解离概率(分别用$ P^{\mathrm{Br}} $和$ P^{\mathrm{Cl}} $标记), (g)—(i)相应的含时分支比R; (j)—(l) 强场极限下Br+CH₂Cl和Cl+CH₂Br两个通道的含时解离概率, (m)—(o)相应的含时解离分支比

Figure 2. For the initial vibrational states of $ |00\rangle $, $ |01\rangle $ and $ |02\rangle $, (a)–(c) two-dimensional vibrational eigenfunction density distributions; (d)–(f) the dissociation probabilities of Br+CH₂Cl and Cl+CH₂Br channels in the weak-field limit (marked with $ P^{\mathrm{Br}} $ and $ P^{\mathrm{Cl}} $, respectively), and (g)–(i) the corresponding time-dependent dissociation branching ratios R; (j)–(l) and (m)–(o) as well as in the strong-field limit.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 CH₂BrCl分子初始振动态为$ |01\rangle $, $ |02\rangle $和$ |11\rangle $时, (a)—(c)基电子态的二维振动本征函数密度分布; (d)—(f)弱场极限下Br+CH₂Cl通道和Cl+CH₂Br通道的含时解离概率(分别用$ P^{\mathrm{Br}} $和$ P^{\mathrm{Cl}} $标记), (g)—(i)相应的含时分支比R; (j)—(l)强场极限下Br+CH₂Cl和Cl+CH₂Br两个通道的含时解离概率, (m)—(o)相应的含时解离分支比

Figure 3. For the initial vibrational states of $ |00\rangle $, $ |01\rangle $ and $ |02\rangle $, (a)–(c) two-dimensional vibrational eigenfunction density distributions; (d)–(f) the dissociation probabilities of Br+CH₂Cl and Cl+CH₂Br channels in the weak-field limit (marked with $ P^{\mathrm{Br}} $ and $ P^{\mathrm{Cl}} $, respectively), and (g)–(i) the corresponding time-dependent dissociation branching ratios R; (j)–(l) and (m)–(o) as well as in the strong-field limit.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 弱场极限下CH₂BrCl分子总解离概率(a)—(f)和分支比(g)—(l)作为啁啾率$ \beta_{0} $和不同初始振动态$ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $的函数

Figure 4. Dependence of (a)−(f) total dissociation probability and (g)−(l) branching ratio of CH₂BrCl on the chirp rate $ \beta_{0} $ and different initial state $ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $ in the weak-field limit.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 强场极限下, CH₂BrCl分子总解离概率(a)—(f)和分支比(g)—(l)作为啁啾率$ \beta_{0} $和不同初始振动态$ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $的函数

Figure 5. (a)–(f) Total dissociation probability and (g)–(l) branching ratio in CH₂BrCl as a function of chirp rate $ \beta_{0} $ and different initial state $ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $ in the strong-field limit.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 (a) $ |00\rangle $, (b) $ |10\rangle $, (c) $ |20\rangle $, (d) $ |01\rangle $, (e) $ |02\rangle $, (f) $ |11\rangle $分别作为初始振动态时, 基电子态其余振动态末态布居之和$ P(t_{\mathrm{f}}) $随啁啾率$ \beta_{0} $的变化行为. 对于所有不同的初始振动态, $ P(t_{\mathrm{f}}) $的最大值都出现在$ \beta_0=0 $附近

Figure 6. (a)–(f) Sum of the remaining vibrational states populations $ P(t_{\mathrm{f}}) $ of the ground electronic state for the initial vibrational state (a) $ |00\rangle $, (b) $ |10\rangle $, (c) $ |20\rangle $, (d) $ |01\rangle $, (e) $ |02\rangle $ and (f) $ |11\rangle $ as a function of $ \beta_0 $, respectively. The maximum of $ P(t_{\mathrm{f}}) $ appears near $ \beta_0=0 $ for all different initial vibrational states.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 随着啁啾率$ \beta_{0} $的改变, (a) $ |00\rangle $, (b) $ |10\rangle $, (c) $ |20\rangle $, (d) $ |01\rangle $, (e) $ |02\rangle $, (f) $ |11\rangle $分别作为初始振动态时, 基电子态不同振动态$ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $的末态布居分布

Figure 7. Final population distributions of different vibrational states $ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $ for the different initial vibrational state (a) $ |00\rangle $, (b) $ |10\rangle $, (c) $ |20\rangle $, (d) $ |01\rangle $, (e) $ |02\rangle $ and (f) $ |11\rangle $, varying with the chirp rate $ \beta_0 $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 强场极限下啁啾脉冲诱导的基电子态振动态共振拉曼散射现象. 初始振动态为$ |00\rangle $, $ |10\rangle $和$ |20\rangle $时, (a)—(i)啁啾率$ \beta_0=0 $, $ \pm30 $ fs²时的初态含时布居$ P_{\nu'\nu''} $、基电子态其余振动态布居之和$ P(t) $、两个激发电子态的含时布居$ P_{1} $和$ P_{2} $

Figure 8. Resonance Raman scattering phenomenon of the vibrational states of the ground electronic state induced by a chirped pulse in the strong-field limit. For the initial vibrational states of $ |00\rangle $, $ |10\rangle $ and $ |20\rangle $, (a)–(i) the time-dependent populations of the initial state $ P_{\nu'\nu''} $, the total of remaining vibrational states of the ground electronic state $ P(t) $, and the two excited electronic states $ P_{1} $ and $ P_{2} $ with three different chirp rates $ \beta_0=0 $, $ \pm30 $ fs².

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 强场极限下啁啾脉冲诱导的基电子态振动态共振拉曼散射现象. 初始振动态为$ |01\rangle $, $ |02\rangle $和$ |11\rangle $时, (a)—(i)啁啾率$ \beta_0=0 $, $ \pm30 $ fs²时的初态含时布居$ P_{\nu'\nu''} $、基电子态其余振动态布居之和$ P(t) $、两个激发电子态的含时布居$ P_{1} $和$ P_{2} $

Figure 9. Resonance Raman scattering phenomenon of the vibrational states of the ground electronic state induced by a chirped pulse in the strong-field limit. For the initial vibrational states of $ |01\rangle $, $ |02\rangle $ and $ |11\rangle $, (a)–(i) the time-dependent populations of the initial state $ P_{\nu'\nu''} $, the total of the remaining vibrational states of the ground electronic state $ P(t) $, and the two excited electronic states $ P_{1} $ and $ P_{2} $ with three different chirp rates $ \beta_0=0 $, $ \pm30 $ fs².

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Mokhtari A, Cong P, Herek J, Zewail A 1990 Nature 348 225 Google Scholar
[2]	Brumer P, Shapiro M 1992 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 43 257 Google Scholar
[3]	King W E, Campbell G H, Frank A, Reed B, Schmerge J F, Siwick B J, Stuart B C, Weber P M 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 111101 Google Scholar
[4]	Sun Z, Wang C, Zhao W, Yang C 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 149 224307 Google Scholar
[5]	Yang J, Zhu X, Wolf T J, Li Z, Nunes J P F, Coffee R, Cryan J P, Gühr M, Hegazy K, Heinz T F, Jobe K, Li R, Shen X, Veccione T, Weathersby S, Wilkin K J, Yoneda C, Zheng Q, Martinez T J, Centurion M, Wang X 2018 Science 361 64 Google Scholar
[6]	Sun Z, Liu Y 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 17397 Google Scholar
[7]	Rubio-Lago L, Chicharro D V, Poullain S M, Zanchet A, Koumarianou G, Glodic P, Samartzis P C, García-Vela A, Bañares L 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 11684 Google Scholar
[8]	Kranabetter L, Kristensen H H, Ghazaryan A, Schouder C A, Chatterley A S, Janssen P, Jensen F, Zillich R E, Lemeshko M, Stapelfeldt H 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 053201 Google Scholar
[9]	Lian Z, Hu Z, Qi H, Fei D, Luo S, Chen Z, Shu C C 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 053105 Google Scholar
[10]	Xu S, Lian Z, Hong Q Q, Wang L, Chen H, Huang Y, Shu C C 2024 Phys. Rev. A 110 023116 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhang H, Lavorel B, Billard F, Hartmann J M, Hertz E, Faucher O, Ma J, Wu J, Gershnabel E, Prior Y, Averbukh I S 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 193401 Google Scholar
[12]	Hong Q Q, Fan L B, Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 013108 Google Scholar
[13]	Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 013408 Google Scholar
[14]	Hong Q Q, Lian Z Z, Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 32763 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhang W, Gong X, Li H, Lu P, Sun F, Ji Q, Lin K, Ma J, Li H, Qiang J, He F, Wu J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 757 Google Scholar
[16]	Lu P, Wang J, Li H, Lin K, Gong X, Song Q, Ji Q, Zhang W, Ma J, Li H, Zeng H, He F, Wu J 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115 2049 Google Scholar
[17]	Guo Z, Fang Y, Ge P, Yu X, Wang J, Han M, Gong Q, Liu Y 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 L051101 Google Scholar
[18]	Yu X, Zhang X, Hu X, Zhao X, Ren D, Li X, Ma P, Wang C, Wu Y, Luo S, Ding D 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 023001 Google Scholar
[19]	Sansone G, Kelkensberg F, Pérez-Torres J, Morales F, Kling M F, Siu W, Ghafur O, Johnsson P, Swoboda M, Benedetti E, Ferrari F, Lépine F, Sanz-Vicario L J, Zherebtsov S, Znakovskaya I, L’Huillier A, Ivanov Y M, Nisoli M, Martín F, Vrakking M J J 2010 Nature 465 763 Google Scholar
[20]	Kang H, Quan W, Wang Y, Lin Z, Wu M, Liu H, Liu X, Wang B B, Liu H J, Gu Y Q, Jia X Y, Liu J, Chen J, Cheng Y 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 203001 Google Scholar
[21]	罗嗣佐, 陈洲, 李孝开, 胡湛, 丁大军 2019 光学学报 39 0126007 Google Scholar Luo S Z, Chen Z, Li X K, Hu Z, Ding D J 2019 Acta Opt. Sin. 39 0126007 Google Scholar
[22]	Li X, Liu Y, Zhang D, He L, Luo S, Shu C C, Ding D 2023 Phys. Rev. A 108 023114 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang W, Yu Z, Gong X, Wang J, Lu P, Li H, Song Q, Ji Q, Lin K, Ma J, Li H, Sun F, Qiang J, Zeng H, He F, Wu J 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 253202 Google Scholar
[24]	Guo Z, Zhang Z, Deng Y, Wang J, Ye D, Liu J, Liu Y 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 143201 Google Scholar
[25]	McFarland B K, Farrell J P, Bucksbaum P H, Guhr M 2008 Science 322 1232 Google Scholar
[26]	Chen Y J, Fu L B, Liu J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 073902 Google Scholar
[27]	Huang Y, Meng C, Wang X, Lü Z, Zhang D, Chen W, Zhao J, Yuan J, Zhao Z 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 123002 Google Scholar
[28]	Yang W, Sheng Z, Feng X, Wu M, Chen Z, Song X 2014 Opt. Express 22 2519 Google Scholar
[29]	He M, Li Y, Zhou Y, Li M, Cao W, Lu P 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 133204 Google Scholar
[30]	Xie W, Yan J, Li M, Cao C, Guo K, Zhou Y, Lu P 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 263202 Google Scholar
[31]	Zewail A H 2000 J. Phys. Chem. A 104 5660 Google Scholar
[32]	Kobayashi Y, Chang K F, Zeng T, Neumark D M, Leone S R 2019 Science 365 79 Google Scholar
[33]	Shu C C, Yuan K J, Dong D, Petersen I R, Bandrauk A D 2017 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8 1 Google Scholar
[34]	Yang D, Cong S L 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 013424 Google Scholar
[35]	Jia Y W, Yuen C, Jing W Q, Zhou Z Y, Lin C, Zhao S F 2024 Phys. Rev. A 110 023112 Google Scholar
[36]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2001 J. Phys. Chem. A 105 2897 Google Scholar
[37]	Csehi A, Halász G J, Cederbaum L S, Vibók Á 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 143 014305 Google Scholar
[38]	Liebel M, Kukura P 2017 Nat. Chem. 9 45 Google Scholar
[39]	Wilma K, Shu C C, Scherf U, Hildner R 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 15329 Google Scholar
[40]	Morichika I, Murata K, Sakurai A, Ishii K, Ashihara S 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 3893 Google Scholar
[41]	Csehi A, Halász G J, Cederbaum L S, Vibók Á 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 074309 Google Scholar
[42]	Tiwari A K, Henriksen N E 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 014306 Google Scholar
[43]	Sun Z, Wang C, Zhao W, Zheng Y, Yang C 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 20957 Google Scholar
[44]	Spanner M, Arango C A, Brumer P 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 133 151101 Google Scholar
[45]	Weigel A, Sebesta A, Kukura P 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 4032 Google Scholar
[46]	Brumer P, Shapiro M 1986 Chem. Phys. Lett. 126 541 Google Scholar
[47]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2003 Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (New York: Wiley
[48]	Garcia-Vela A, Henriksen N E 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 824 Google Scholar
[49]	García-Vela A 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 10346 Google Scholar
[50]	Serrano-Jiménez A, Bañares L, García-Vela A 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 7885 Google Scholar
[51]	Dey D, Henriksen N E 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11 8470 Google Scholar
[52]	Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 164308 Google Scholar
[53]	Tiwari A K, Dey D, Henriksen N E 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 023417 Google Scholar
[54]	Liu Y, Meng J Q, Sun Z, Shu C C 2024 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15 8393 Google Scholar
[55]	García-Vela A 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 153204 Google Scholar
[56]	Abrashkevich D G, Shapiro M, Brumer P 2002 J. Chem. Phys. 116 5584 Google Scholar
[57]	Nichols S R, Weinacht T C, Rozgonyi T, Pearson B J 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 043407 Google Scholar
[58]	Luo S, Zhou S, Hu W, Li X, Ma P, Yu J, Zhu R, Wang C, Liu F, Yan B, Liu A, Yang Y, Guo F, Dajun D 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 063415 Google Scholar
[59]	Esposito V J, Liu T, Wang G, Caracciolo A, Vansco M F, Marchetti B, Karsili T N, Lester M I 2021 J. Phys. Chem. A 125 6571 Google Scholar
[60]	Jing W Q, Sun Z P, Zhao S F, Shu C C 2023 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14 11305 Google Scholar
[61]	Sarma M, Adhikari S, Mishra M K 2008 J. Phys. Chem. A 112 13302 Google Scholar
[62]	Geißler D, Marquetand P, González-Vázquez J, González L, Rozgonyi T, Weinacht T 2012 J. Phys. Chem. A 116 11434 Google Scholar
[63]	Corrales M E, de Nalda R, Bañares L 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1345 Google Scholar
[64]	Bouallagui A, Zanchet A, Bañares L, García-Vela A 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 20365 Google Scholar
[65]	Rozgonyi T, González L 2008 J. Phys. Chem. A 112 5573 Google Scholar
[66]	Shu C C, Rozgonyi T, González L, Henriksen N E 2012 J. Chem. Phys. 136 174303 Google Scholar
[67]	Chicharro D, Marggi Poullain S, González-Vázquez J, Bañares L 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 013945 Google Scholar
[68]	Muthiah B, Kasai T, Lin K C 2021 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23 6098 Google Scholar
[69]	Lanczos C 1950 J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand 45 255 Google Scholar
[70]	Park T J, Light J 1986 J. Chem. Phys. 85 5870 Google Scholar
[71]	Sun Z, Yang C, Zheng Y 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 143 224309 Google Scholar
[72]	Kosloff R 1988 J. Phys. Chem. 92 2087 Google Scholar
[73]	Simpson J R, Roslyak O, Duque J G, Hároz E H, Crochet J J, Telg H, Piryatinski A, Walker A R H, Doorn S K 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 637 Google Scholar
[74]	Guo Y, Shu C C, Dong D, Nori F 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 223202 Google Scholar
[75]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2012 Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (New York: John Wiley & Sons) pp95–152

[1]	Wei Jin-Zhi, Wang Jin-Hao, Chen Jun-Xue. Coherent control of polarization transformation of Bloch surface waves. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(21): 214201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231050
[2]	Zhao Jia-Lin, Cheng Kai, Yu Xue-Ke, Zhao Ji-Jun, Su Yan. Theoretical research of time-dependent density functional on initiated photo-dissociation of some typical energetic materials at excited state. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(20): 203301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210670
[3]	Meng Da, Cong Xin, Leng Yu-Chen, Lin Miao-Ling, Wang Jia-Hong, Yu Bin-Lu, Liu Xue-Lu, Yu Xue-Feng, Tan Ping-Heng. Resonant Multi-phonon Raman scattering of black phosphorus. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(16): 167803. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200696
[4]	Yan Yi-Hui, Liu Yu-Zhu, Ding Peng-Fei, Yin Wen-Yi. Multiphoton ionization dissociation dynamics of iodoethane studied with velocity map imaging technique. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(20): 203301. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181468
[5]	Luo Jin-Long, Ling Feng-Zi, Li Shuai, Wang Yan-Mei, Zhang Bing. Ultrafast photodissociation dynamics of butanone in 3s Rydberg state. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(2): 023301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.023301
[6]	Qin Chao-Chao, Huang Yan, Peng Yu-Feng. Photodissociation dynamics of Br2 in wavelength range of 360-610 nm. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(19): 193301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.193301
[7]	Liu Yu-Zhu, Xiao Shao-Rong, Wang Jun-Feng, He Zhong-Fu, Qiu Xue-Jun, Gregor Knopp. Multi-photon dissociation dynamics of Freon 1110 induced by femtosecond laser pulse. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(11): 113301. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.113301
[8]	Liu Yu-Zhu, Chen Yun-Yun, Zheng Gai-Ge, Jin Feng, Gregor Knopp. Multiphoton ionization and dissociation dynamics of Freon-113 induced by femtosecond laser pulse. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(5): 053302. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.053302
[9]	Liu Yu-Zhu, Deng Xu-Lan, Li Shuai, Guan Yue, Li Jing, Long Jin-You, Zhang Bing. Multi-photon dissociation dynamics of Freon 114B2 under UV radiation by femtosecond laser pulse. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(19): 193301. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.193301
[10]	Zhang Lei, Ge Yan, Zhang Xiang-Yang. Study on atomic localization of Λ-type quasi-four level atoms based on absorption with quantum coherent control. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(13): 134204. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.134204
[11]	Yang Xue, Yan Bing, Lian Ke-Yan, Ding Da-Jun. Theoretical study on the photodissociation reaction of α-cyclohexanedione in ground state. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(21): 213101. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.213101
[12]	Yao Yun-Hua, Lu Chen-Hui, Xu Shu-Wu, Ding Jing-Xin, Jia Tian-Qing, Zhang Shi-An, Sun Zhen-Rong. Femtosecond pulse shaping technology and its applications. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(18): 184201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.184201
[13]	Yao Hong-Bin, Zhang Ji, Peng Min, Li Wen-Liang. Theoretical study of the dissociation of H2+ and the quantum control of dynamic process by an intense laser field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(19): 198202. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.198202
[14]	Xu Tian-Yu, He Feng. Control of electron localization in the dissociation of H2+ using attosecond and two-color femtosecond pulses. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(6): 068201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.068201
[15]	Liu Yu-Zhu, Xiao Shao-Rong, Zhang Cheng-Yi, Zheng Gai-Ge, Chen Yun-Yun. Calibration of velocity map imaging system and photodissociation dynamics of 1, 4-C4H8BrCl. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(19): 193301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.193301
[16]	Su Jia-Ni, Deng Wen-Wu, Li Gao-Xiang. Coherent control of the Goos-Hnchen shift in four-level atomic medium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(14): 144210. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.144210
[17]	Zhang Jun, Tan Ping-Heng, Zhao Wei-Jie. Accurate determination of electronic transition energy of carbon nanotubes from the resonant behavior of radial breathing modes and their overtones. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(11): 7966-7973. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.7966
[18]	Li Rui, Yan Bing, Zhao Shu-Tao, Guo Qing-Qun, Lian Ke-Yan, Tian Chuan-Jin, Pan Shou-Fu. Spin-orbit ab initio calculation of photodissociation of methyl iodide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(7): 4130-4133. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4130
[19]	Guo Hong, Li Gao-Xiang, Peng Ji-Sheng. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(11): 2517-2523. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2517
[20]	HUANG SHI-HUA, MO YU-DONG. RESONANT RAMAN SCATTERING OF Hg1-xCdxTe . Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(5): 964-967. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.964

Catalog

Vol. 73, Issue 24 - 2024-12-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 175
PDF Downloads: 10
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板