搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

空化场中大气泡对空化泡振动的抑制效应分析

黄晨阳 李凡 田华 胡静 陈时 王成会 郭建中 莫润阳

引用本文:
Citation:

空化场中大气泡对空化泡振动的抑制效应分析

黄晨阳, 李凡, 田华, 胡静, 陈时, 王成会, 郭建中, 莫润阳

Analysis of suppressive effect of large bubbles on oscillation of cavitation bubble in cavitation field

Huang Chen-Yang, Li Fan, Tian Hua, Hu Jing, Chen Shi, Wang Cheng-Hui, Guo Jian-Zhong, Mo Run-Yang
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 为探究空化场中多气泡之间的相互作用, 结合观察到的注入大气泡周围飞舞的小气泡的实验现象, 构建了由两个大气泡和一个空化泡组成的三气泡系统, 通过考虑气泡间相互作用的时间延迟效应以及大泡的非球形振动, 得到修正的气泡动力学方程组, 并数值分析了气泡的振动模态、平衡半径、声波压力与频率等参量对小空化气泡的振动行为与所受次级Bjerknes力的影响. 结果表明, 大气泡的非球形效应主要表现为一种近场效应, 对空化泡的振动影响很小, 几乎可以忽略不计. 大气泡可抑制空化泡的振动, 但当大气泡半径接近于共振半径时, 空化泡振动幅值曲线出现共振峰, 即存在耦合共振响应. 大气泡半径越大, 对空化泡抑制作用越强, 当空化泡处在两个毫米级大气泡附近时抑制更加显著. 声波压力与频率不仅直接影响气泡的振动, 还影响空化泡与大气泡之间相互作用的强弱, 表现为空化泡所受的次级Bjerknes力在特定的大气泡半径范围内变得对气泡尺寸变化较为敏感, 即小的大气泡半径变化可能导致明显的力大小变化, 且不同驱动频率下, 空化泡所受次级Bjerknes力的敏感半径分布区间不同. 空化泡受到的次级Bjerknes力在距离较小或者较大时均可能表现为斥力, 与实验观察现象一致. 随着声波压力的增大, 气泡间距影响下的力响应模式可能不同, 甚至可能出现在特定距离内因声反常吸收而导致的作用力减弱现象.
    In this work, the interaction among multiple bubbles in a cavitation field is investigated by combining the experimental observation of small bubbles hovering around large bubbles. A model composed of three bubbles is developed, and the dynamic behavior of cavitation bubble is analyzed. By considering the time delay effect of the interaction among bubbles and the nonspherical oscillation of large bubbles, the modified bubble dynamic equations are obtained. Numerical results show that the nonspherical effect of large bubbles has little effect on the oscillation of cavitation bubble. The suppressive effect of large bubble on cavitation bubble is closely related to the radius of the large bubble. The larger the size of the large bubble, the stronger the suppression is. When the size of large bubble approaches to the resonant radius, the oscillation of cavitation bubble presents coupled resonance response, and the maximum expansion radius of bubble shows a resonance peak. The distribution of the secondary Bjerknes force versus bubble radius and the separation distance is strongly influenced by driving frequencies or sound pressure. When the large bubble is on the order of submillimeter, the intensity of the secondary Bjerknes force and the acoustic response mode are different due to the different intensity of the nonlinear response of the cavitation bubble. As the distance decreases, when the acoustic pressure increases to a certain value, the secondary Bjerknes force on the cavitation bubble decreases due to abnormal acoustic absorption. The secondary Bjerknes force on cavitation bubble is likely to be repulsive at different separation distances. The theoretical results accord well with experimental phenomenon.
      通信作者: 王成会, wangld001@snnu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11974232, 11727813)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Wang Cheng-Hui, wangld001@snnu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11974232, 11727813)
    [1]

    Neppiras E A 1980 Phys. Rep. 61 159Google Scholar

    [2]

    冯若, 赵逸云, 陈兆华, 黄金兰, 王双维, 莫喜平, 李华茂, 朱昌平 1994 声学技术 13 56

    Feng R, Zhao Y Y, Chen Z H, Huang J L, Wang S X, Mo X P, Li H M, Zhu C P 1994 Tech. Acoust. 13 56

    [3]

    Galleguillos R 2022 Appl. Acoust. 192 108716Google Scholar

    [4]

    Brenner M P, Hilgenfeldt S, Lohse D 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 425Google Scholar

    [5]

    Miller D L 1987 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 13 443Google Scholar

    [6]

    Lu X Z, Chahine G L, Hsiao C T 2012 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131 24Google Scholar

    [7]

    Plessett M S, Prosperetti A 1977 Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 9 145Google Scholar

    [8]

    Keller J B, Miksis M 1980 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68 628Google Scholar

    [9]

    Lauterborn W 1976 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59 283Google Scholar

    [10]

    Bjerknes V F K 1906 Fields of Force (New York: Columbia University Press) pp29–55

    [11]

    Lauterborn W, Kurz T 2010 Rep. Prog. Phys. 73 106501Google Scholar

    [12]

    Zhang X M, Li F, Wang C, Mo R, Hu J, Guo J, Lin S 2022 Ultrasonics 126 106809Google Scholar

    [13]

    Li F, Zhang X M, Tian H, Hu J, Chen S, Mo R Y, Wang C, Guo J 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem. 87 106057Google Scholar

    [14]

    An Y 2011 Phys. Rev. E 83 066313Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ida M, Naoe T, Futakawa M 2007 Phys. Rev. E 76 046309Google Scholar

    [16]

    张鹏利, 林书玉 2009 物理学报 58 7797Google Scholar

    Zhang P L, Lin S Y 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 7797Google Scholar

    [17]

    Qin D, Zou Q Q, Lei S, Wang W, Li Z Y 2021 Ultrason. Sonochem. 78 105712Google Scholar

    [18]

    Ma Y, Zhang G Q, Ma T 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem. 84 105953Google Scholar

    [19]

    Chen H Y, Chen Z L, Li Y 2020 Ultrason. Sonochem. 61 104814Google Scholar

    [20]

    李凡, 张先梅, 田华, 胡静, 陈时, 王成会, 郭建中, 莫润阳 2022 物理学报 71 084303Google Scholar

    Li F, Zhang X M, Tian H, Hu J, Chen S, Wang C H, Guo J Z, Mo R Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 084303Google Scholar

    [21]

    Keller J B, Kolodner I I 1956 J. Appl. Phys. 27 1152Google Scholar

    [22]

    Brenner M P, Lohse D, Dupont T F 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 954Google Scholar

    [23]

    Mettin R, Akhatov I, Parlitz U, Ohl C D, Lauterborn W 1997 Phys. Rev. E 56 2924

    [24]

    Doinikov A A, Zavtrak S T 1996 Ultrasonics 34 807Google Scholar

    [25]

    Yasui K, Iida Y, Tuziuti T, Kozuka T, Towata A 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 1Google Scholar

    [26]

    Nguyen B Q H, Maksymov I S, Suslov S A 2021 Sci. Rep. 11 1Google Scholar

  • 图 1  声场中大气泡与小气泡(团)的相互作用

    Fig. 1.  Interaction between large bubbles and small bubbles (cluster) in sound field.

    图 2  三气泡系统

    Fig. 2.  Three bubbles system.

    图 3  (a)气泡1的形状模态系数的变化; (b)气泡1半径的变化; (c)气泡3半径的变化; (d)气泡1和3之间的F13的变化

    Fig. 3.  (a) Variation of the shape mode coefficient of bubble 1; (b) variation of the radius of bubble 1; (c) variation of the radius of bubble 3; (d) variation of F13 between bubble 1 and 3.

    图 4  不同驱动压力下, (a)气泡3的最大半径随气泡2半径的改变; (b)气泡1和3之间的F13随气泡2半径的改变

    Fig. 4.  Under different driving pressures, (a) variation of the maximum radius of bubble 3 with the radius of bubble 2; (b) variation of the F13 between bubbles 1 and 3 with the radius of bubble 2.

    图 5  不同驱动声压频率下, (a)气泡3的最大半径随气泡2半径的改变; (b)气泡1和3之间的F13随气泡2半径的改变

    Fig. 5.  Under different driving sound pressure frequencies: (a) Variation of the maximum radius of bubble 3 with the radius of bubble 2; (b) variation of the F13 between bubbles 1 and 3 with the radius of bubble 2.

    图 6  气泡1和3之间的次级Bjerknes力随气泡2和气泡3半径的变化 (a)声波频率为28 kHz; (b) 声波频率为40 kHz; (c) 声波频率为80 kHz

    Fig. 6.  Variation of the secondary Bjerknes force between bubbles 1 and 3 with the radius of bubbles 2 and 3: (a) Acoustic frequencies is 28 kHz; (b) acoustic frequencies is 40 kHz; (c) acoustic frequencies is 80 kHz.

    图 7  气泡1和3之间的次级Bjerknes力随驱动声压幅值以及垂直距离h的变化 (a) 声波频率为20 kHz; (b) 声波频率为40 kHz; (c) 声波频率为80 kHz.

    Fig. 7.  Variation of the secondary Bjerknes force between bubbles 1 and 3 with the driving sound pressure amplitude and the vertical distance h: (a) Acoustic frequency is 20 kHz; (b) acoustic frequency is 40 kHz; (c) acoustic frequency is 80 kHz.

    图 8  气泡1和3之间的次级Bjerknes力随驱动声波频率以及垂直距离h的变化 (a) 驱动声压幅值为1.6 atm; (b) 驱动声压幅值为1.8 atm; (c) 驱动声压幅值为2.0 atm

    Fig. 8.  Variation of the secondary Bjerknes force between bubbles 1 and 3 with the driving acoustic frequency and the vertical distance h: (a) Driving sound pressure amplitude is 1.6 atm; (b) driving sound pressure amplitude is 1.8 atm; (c) driving sound pressure amplitude is 2.0 atm.

  • [1]

    Neppiras E A 1980 Phys. Rep. 61 159Google Scholar

    [2]

    冯若, 赵逸云, 陈兆华, 黄金兰, 王双维, 莫喜平, 李华茂, 朱昌平 1994 声学技术 13 56

    Feng R, Zhao Y Y, Chen Z H, Huang J L, Wang S X, Mo X P, Li H M, Zhu C P 1994 Tech. Acoust. 13 56

    [3]

    Galleguillos R 2022 Appl. Acoust. 192 108716Google Scholar

    [4]

    Brenner M P, Hilgenfeldt S, Lohse D 2002 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 425Google Scholar

    [5]

    Miller D L 1987 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 13 443Google Scholar

    [6]

    Lu X Z, Chahine G L, Hsiao C T 2012 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131 24Google Scholar

    [7]

    Plessett M S, Prosperetti A 1977 Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 9 145Google Scholar

    [8]

    Keller J B, Miksis M 1980 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68 628Google Scholar

    [9]

    Lauterborn W 1976 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59 283Google Scholar

    [10]

    Bjerknes V F K 1906 Fields of Force (New York: Columbia University Press) pp29–55

    [11]

    Lauterborn W, Kurz T 2010 Rep. Prog. Phys. 73 106501Google Scholar

    [12]

    Zhang X M, Li F, Wang C, Mo R, Hu J, Guo J, Lin S 2022 Ultrasonics 126 106809Google Scholar

    [13]

    Li F, Zhang X M, Tian H, Hu J, Chen S, Mo R Y, Wang C, Guo J 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem. 87 106057Google Scholar

    [14]

    An Y 2011 Phys. Rev. E 83 066313Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ida M, Naoe T, Futakawa M 2007 Phys. Rev. E 76 046309Google Scholar

    [16]

    张鹏利, 林书玉 2009 物理学报 58 7797Google Scholar

    Zhang P L, Lin S Y 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 7797Google Scholar

    [17]

    Qin D, Zou Q Q, Lei S, Wang W, Li Z Y 2021 Ultrason. Sonochem. 78 105712Google Scholar

    [18]

    Ma Y, Zhang G Q, Ma T 2022 Ultrason. Sonochem. 84 105953Google Scholar

    [19]

    Chen H Y, Chen Z L, Li Y 2020 Ultrason. Sonochem. 61 104814Google Scholar

    [20]

    李凡, 张先梅, 田华, 胡静, 陈时, 王成会, 郭建中, 莫润阳 2022 物理学报 71 084303Google Scholar

    Li F, Zhang X M, Tian H, Hu J, Chen S, Wang C H, Guo J Z, Mo R Y 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 084303Google Scholar

    [21]

    Keller J B, Kolodner I I 1956 J. Appl. Phys. 27 1152Google Scholar

    [22]

    Brenner M P, Lohse D, Dupont T F 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 954Google Scholar

    [23]

    Mettin R, Akhatov I, Parlitz U, Ohl C D, Lauterborn W 1997 Phys. Rev. E 56 2924

    [24]

    Doinikov A A, Zavtrak S T 1996 Ultrasonics 34 807Google Scholar

    [25]

    Yasui K, Iida Y, Tuziuti T, Kozuka T, Towata A 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 1Google Scholar

    [26]

    Nguyen B Q H, Maksymov I S, Suslov S A 2021 Sci. Rep. 11 1Google Scholar

  • [1] 屈广宁, 凡凤仙, 张斯宏, 苏明旭. 驻波声场中单分散细颗粒的相互作用特性. 物理学报, 2020, 69(6): 064704. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191681
    [2] 陈新龙, 门福殿, 田青松. 反常磁矩对弱磁场弱相互作用费米气体热力学性质的影响. 物理学报, 2015, 64(8): 080501. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.080501
    [3] 王成会, 程建春. 弹性管中泡群内气泡的非线性声响应. 物理学报, 2014, 63(13): 134301. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.134301
    [4] 席发元, 吕会议. 不同 Ep/q 值的离子与氧化铝毛细孔的相互作用. 物理学报, 2013, 62(1): 016104. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.016104
    [5] 马松华, 方建平. 扩展的(2+1)维浅水波方程的尖峰孤子解及其相互作用. 物理学报, 2012, 61(18): 180505. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.180505
    [6] 满达夫, 那仁满都拉. 具有能量输入/输出的固体层中孤立波的传播及相互作用特性. 物理学报, 2010, 59(1): 60-66. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.60
    [7] 宗丰德, 张解放. 装载于外势场中的玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚N-孤子间的相互作用. 物理学报, 2008, 57(5): 2658-2668. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2658
    [8] 马松华, 吴小红, 方建平, 郑春龙. (3+1)维Burgers系统的新精确解及其特殊孤子结构. 物理学报, 2008, 57(1): 11-17. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.11
    [9] 曹龙贵, 陆大全, 胡 巍, 杨平保, 朱叶青, 郭 旗. 亚强非局域空间光孤子的相互作用. 物理学报, 2008, 57(10): 6365-6372. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.6365
    [10] 江德生, 佘卫龙. 光伏孤子对向传播相互作用研究. 物理学报, 2007, 56(1): 245-251. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.245
    [11] 黎扬钢, 佘卫龙, 王红成. 光致异构聚合物中相互作用光学空间孤子对的垂直光调控. 物理学报, 2007, 56(4): 2229-2236. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2229
    [12] 刘志明, 崔 田, 马琰铭, 刘冰冰, 邹广田. Nb2H 的电子结构和相互作用. 物理学报, 2007, 56(8): 4877-4883. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4877
    [13] 马松华, 强继业, 方建平. (2+1)维Boiti-Leon-Pempinelli系统的混沌行为及孤子间的相互作用. 物理学报, 2007, 56(2): 620-626. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.620
    [14] 袁都奇. 相互作用对玻色气体热力学性质及稳定性的影响. 物理学报, 2006, 55(4): 1634-1638. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1634
    [15] 黄晓菁, 何素贞, 吴晨旭. 金属纳米结构表面吸附的CO分子在外电场中的相互作用. 物理学报, 2006, 55(5): 2454-2458. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2454
    [16] 门福殿. 弱磁场中弱相互作用费米气体的热力学性质. 物理学报, 2006, 55(4): 1622-1627. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1622
    [17] 江德生, 佘卫龙. 多个光伏空间亮孤子相互作用研究. 物理学报, 2005, 54(5): 2090-2095. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2090
    [18] 宋克慧. 利用Λ型原子与双模腔场的相互作用进行量子信息处理. 物理学报, 2005, 54(10): 4730-4735. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4730
    [19] 苏国珍, 陈丽璇. 弱相互作用费米气体的热力学性质. 物理学报, 2004, 53(4): 984-990. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.984
    [20] 江德生, 欧阳世根, 佘卫龙. 暗-暗与亮-暗光伏孤子相互作用. 物理学报, 2004, 53(11): 3777-3785. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3777
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2237
  • PDF下载量:  57
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-10-13
  • 修回日期:  2023-01-05
  • 上网日期:  2023-01-18
  • 刊出日期:  2023-03-20

/

返回文章
返回