基于平凹多通腔的非线性脉冲压缩技术

李聘滨; 滕浩; 田文龙; 黄振文; 朱江峰; 钟诗阳; 运晨霞; 刘文军; 魏志义

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20240110

摘要

采用平凹多通腔和固体薄片组的非线性脉冲光谱展宽与压缩方案开展了100 W皮秒激光非线性脉冲压缩的研究. 以多片熔融石英薄片作为非线性介质, 在平凹腔中皮秒激光通过自相位调制将光谱宽度由0.24 nm展宽至4.8 nm, 用光栅对进行色散补偿压缩, 实现压缩后的脉冲宽度为483 fs, 对应压缩比为22, 最终输出飞秒激光的平均功率为44.2 W. 相对于常规多通腔方案, 该平凹腔结构紧凑, 光路稳定性好, 压缩比高, 非常有利于非线性光谱展宽与压缩的实现.

关键词:

Abstract

Ultrafast femtosecond laser system with hundreds of microjoules of energy, operating at a repetition frequency of several kilohertz, has very important applications in many fields such as medicine, mid-infrared laser generation, industrial processing, and vibrational spectroscopy. The chirped pulse amplification technique provides a feasible path to obtain light sources with those parameters. However, the use of chirped pulse amplification increases the technical complexity and cost of the laser system. Recently, the proposal of a multi-pass cell (MPC) nonlinear pulse compression technique has enabled us to obtain high power ultrafast femtosecond pulses with reduced technical complexity and cost. The device requires only two concave mirrors and a nonlinear medium in between. In the past seven years, the multi-pass cell nonlinear pulse compression technique has made great progress, making it possible to obtain ultrashort pulses with average power of more than a few kW and peak power of tens to hundreds of TW.In this work, we achieve nonlinear pulse compression of a 100-W picosecond laser by using an improved nonlinear pulse compression scheme that combines a hybrid of a plano-cancave multi-pass cell and multi-thin-plate. Using fused silica plates in plano-cancave cavity, the spectral bandwidth (FWHM) of input picosecond laser is broadened from 0.24 nm to 4.8 nm due to self-phase modulation effect, the pulse is compressed to 483 fs by dispersion compensation using grating pairs, which corresponds to a compression factor of 22, and the final output power of 44.2 W is obtained. Compared with traditional MPC, the plano-cancave cavity scheme we developed is a very promising solution for nonlinear compression due to its compactness, more stability and large compression ratio.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
西安电子科技大学光电工程学院, 西安　710071

2.
中国科学院物理研究所, 北京凝聚态物理国家研究中心, 北京　100190

3.
中国科学院大学物理学院, 北京　100049

4.
北京邮电大学理学院, 北京　100876

通信作者: 滕浩, hteng@iphy.ac.cn ; 朱江峰, jfzhu@xidian.edu.cn ;

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2022YFA1604200)和国家自然科学基金(批准号: 12034020)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Telecommunications Engineering, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China

2.
Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

3.
School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

4.
School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China

Corresponding author: Teng Hao, hteng@iphy.ac.cn ; Zhu Jiang-Feng, jfzhu@xidian.edu.cn ;

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFA1604200) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12034020).

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Mourou G 2019 Rev. Modern Phys. 91 030501 Google Scholar
[2]	Fattahi H, Barros H G, Gorjan M, Nubbemeyer T, Alsaif B, Teisset C Y, Schultze M, Prinz S, Haefner M, Ueffing M, Alismail A, Vámos L, Schwarz A, Pronin O, Brons J, Geng X T, Arisholm G, Ciappina M, Yakovlev V S, Kim D E, Azzeer A M, Karpowicz N, Sutter D, Major Z, Metzger T, Krausz F 2014 Optica 1 45 Google Scholar
[3]	Strickland D, Mourou G 1985 Opt. Commun. 55 447 Google Scholar
[4]	Brabec T, Krausz F 2000 Rev. Modern Phys. 72 545 Google Scholar
[5]	Kärtner F X, Morgner U, Ell R, Ippen E P, Fujimoto J G, Scheuer V, Angelow, Tschudi T 2001 The 4th Pacific Rim Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Chiba, Japan, July 15–19, 2001 pTuJ3_1
[6]	Li W Q, Gan Z B, Yu L H, Wang C, Liu Y Q, Guo Z, Xu L, Xu M, Hang Y, Xu Y, Wang Z Y, Huang P, Cao P, Yao B, Zhang X B, Chen L R, Tang Y H, Li S, Liu X Y, Li S M, He M Z, Yin D J, Liang X Y, Leng Y X, Li R X, Xu Z Z 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 5681 Google Scholar
[7]	Bagnoud V, Salin F 2000 Appl. Phys. B 70 S165 Google Scholar
[8]	Sun D, Gao J, Wang W, Du X, Gao Y X, Gao Z C, Liang X Y 2021 IEEE Photonics J. 13 1 Google Scholar
[9]	Schneider W, Ryabov A, Lombosi C S, Metzger T, Major Z S, Fülöp Z A, Baum P 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 6604 Google Scholar
[10]	Wang D, Du Y L, Wu Y C, Xu L, An X C, Cao L Q, Li M, Wang J T, Sahng J L, Zhou T J, Tong LX, Gao Q S, Zhang K, Tang C, Zhu R H 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 3838 Google Scholar
[11]	Gao Q S, Zhou T J, Shang J L, Wang D, Li M, Wu Y C, Wang J T, Wang Y N, Xu L, Du Y L, Chen X M, Zhang K, Tang C 2020 High Power and Particle Beams 32 121009 Google Scholar
[12]	Russbueldt P, Mans T, Weitenberg J, Hoffmann H D, Poprawe P 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 4169 Google Scholar
[13]	Veselis L, Bartulevicius T, Madeikis K, Michailovas A, Rusteika N 2018 Opt. Express 26 31873 Google Scholar
[14]	Knall J M, Engholm M, Boilard T, Bernier M, Digonnet M J 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 013903 Google Scholar
[15]	高清松, 胡浩, 裴正平, 童立新, 周唐建, 唐淳 2012 中国激光 39 7 Gao Q S, Hu H, Pei Z P, Tong L X, Zhou T J, Tang C 2012 Chin. J. Lasers 39 7
[16]	Dietz T, Jenne M, Bauer D, Scharun M, Sutter D, Killi A 2020 Opt. Express 28 11415 Google Scholar
[17]	王海林, 董静, 刘贺言, 郝婧婕, 朱晓, 张金伟 2021 光子学报 50 117 Google Scholar Wang H L, Dong J, Liu H Y, Hao J J, Zhu X, Zhang J W 2021 Acta Photonica Sin. 50 117 Google Scholar
[18]	Nubbemeyer T, Kaumanns M, Ueffing M, Gorjan M, Alismail A, Fattahi H, Brons J, Pronin O, Barros H G, Major Z, Metzger T, Sutter D, Krausz F 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 1381 Google Scholar
[19]	董雪岩, 李平雪, 李舜, 王婷婷, 杨敏 2021 中国激光 48 41 Google Scholar Dong X Y, Li P X, Li Y, Wang T T, Yang M 2021 Chin. J. Lasers 48 41 Google Scholar
[20]	Khazanov E A 2022 Quantum Electron. 52 208 Google Scholar
[21]	Nagy T, Simon P, Veisz L 2021 Adv. Phys. X 6 1845795 Google Scholar
[22]	Viotti A L, Seidel M, Escoto E, Rajhans S, Leemans W P, Hartl I, Heyl C M 2022 Optica 9 197 Google Scholar
[23]	Jocher C, Eidam T, Hädrich S, Limpert J, Tünnermann A 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 4407 Google Scholar
[24]	Nisoli M, De Silvestri S, Svelto O 1996 Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 2793 Google Scholar
[25]	Hädrich S, Krebs M, Hoffmann A, Klenke A, Rothhardt J, Limpert J, Tünnermann A 2015 Light Sci. Appl. 4 e320 Google Scholar
[26]	Rothhardt J, Hädrich S, Carstens H, Herrick N, Demmler S, Limpert J, Tünnermann A 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 4605 Google Scholar
[27]	Herriott D, Kogelnik H, Kompfner R 1964 Appl. Opt. 3 523 Google Scholar
[28]	Schulte J, Sartorius T, Weitenberg J, Vernaleken A, Russbueldt P 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 4511 Google Scholar
[29]	Grebing C, Müller M, Buldt J, Stark H, Limpert J 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 6250 Google Scholar
[30]	Kaumanns M, Kormin D, Nubbemeyer T, Pervak V, Karsch S 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 929 Google Scholar
[31]	Weitenberg J, Saule T, Schulte J, Russbueldt P 2017 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 53 1 Google Scholar
[32]	Raab A K, Seidel M, Guo C, Sytcevich I, Arisholm G, Anne L H, Cord L A, Viotti A L 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 5084 Google Scholar
[33]	Seidel M, Balla P, Li C, Arisholm G, Winkelmann L, Hartl I, Heyl C M 2022 Ultraf. Sci. 17 9754919 Google Scholar
[34]	Song J J, Wang Z H, Wang X Z, Lü R C, Teng H, Zhu J F, Wei Z Y 2021 Chin. Opt. Lett. 19 093201 Google Scholar
[35]	Lavenu L, Natile M, Guichard F, Zaouter Y, Delen X, Hanna M, Mottay E, Georges P 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 2252 Google Scholar
[36]	Viotti A L, Alisauskas S, Tünnermann H, Escoto E, Seidel M, Dudde K, Manschwetus B, Hartl I, Christoph M H 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 4686 Google Scholar
[37]	Russbueldt P, Weitenberg J, Schulte J, Meyer R, Meinhardt C, Hoffmann H D, Poprawe R 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 5222 Google Scholar
[38]	Rajhans S, Velpula P K, Escoto E, Shalloo R, Farace B, Põder K, Osterhoff J, Leemans W P, Hartl I, Heyl C M 2021 Advanced Solid State Lasers Washington, DC, USA, October 3–7, 2021 paper AW2A.6
[39]	Gierschke P, Grebing C, Abdelaal M, Lenski M, Buldt J, Wang Z, Heuermann T, Mueller M, Gebhardt M, Rothhardt J, Limpert J 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 3511.Google Scholar
[40]	Balla P, Wahid A B, Sytcevich I, Guo C, Viotti A L, Silletti L, Cartella A, Alisauskas S, Tavakol H, Grosse-Wortmann U, Schönberg A, Seidel M, Trabattoni A, Manschwetus B, Lang T, Calegari F, Couairon A, L’Huillier A, Arnold C L, Hartl I, Heyl C M 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 2572 Google Scholar
[41]	Viotti A L, Li C, Arisholm G, Winkelmann L, Hartl I, Heyl C M, Seidel M 2023 Opt. Lett. 48 984 Google Scholar
[42]	Omar A, Vogel T, Hoffmann M, Saraceno C J 2023 Opt. Lett. 48 1458 Google Scholar
[43]	Heyl C M, Seidel M, Escoto E, Schönberg A, Carlström S, Arisholm G, Lang T, Hartl I 2022 J. Phys. Photonics 4 014002 Google Scholar
[44]	Tsai C L, Meyer F, Omar A, Wang Y C, Liang A X, Lu C H, Hoffmann M, Yang S D, Saraceno C J 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 4115 Google Scholar
[45]	Lavenu L, Natile M, Guichard F, Délen X, Hanna M, Zaouter Y, Georges P 2019 Opt. Express 27 1958 Google Scholar
[46]	Daniault L, Cheng Z, Kaur J, Hergott J F, Réau F, Tcherbakoff O, Daher N, Délen X, Hanna M, Rodrigo L M 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 5264 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 平凹多通腔结构示意图

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of plano-cancave multi-pass cavity structure.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 常规双凹多通腔原理示意图

Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of conventional double concave multi-pass cavity principle.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 平凹多通腔原理示意图

Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of plano-cancave multi-pass cavity principle.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 常规双凹MPC光斑分布示意图　(a)凹面反射镜1; (b)凹面反射镜2

Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of conventional double concave MPC spot distribution: (a) Concave mirror 1; (b) concave mirror 2.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 平凹MPC光斑分布示意图　(a) 凹面反射镜1; (b)平面反射镜2

Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of plano-cancave MPC spot distribution: (a) Concave mirror 1; (b) plano mirror 2.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 平凹MPC非线性脉冲压缩装置示意图(HR, 高反镜; L1—L4, 透镜; TG1和TG2, 光栅)

Fig. 6. Schematic diagram of plano-cancave MPC pulse nonlinear compression device. HR, high reflective mirrors; L1−L4, Lens; TG1 and TG2, transmission gratings.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 皮秒激光器输出特性　(a)输出光谱; (b)输出脉冲宽度自相关信号

Fig. 7. Output characteristics picosecond of laser: (a) Output spectrum; (b) autocorrelation signal of output pulse width.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 MPC展宽前后的光谱示意图

Fig. 8. Spectral schematic before and after MPC broadening.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 MPC压缩后的脉冲自相关曲线

Fig. 9. Measured autocorrelation signal of output pulse after MPC compression.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 输出光束质量　(a)皮秒激光器输出光束质量; (b) MPC输出光束质量

Fig. 10. Output beam quality: (a) Picosecond laser output beam quality; (b) MPC output beam quality.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 单级MPC非线性脉冲压缩技术研究进展

Table 1. Progress in single-stage MPC nonlinear pulse compression technique.

输入功率/W	输入脉宽/fs	重复频率/MHz	输出功率/W	输出脉宽/fs	压缩比	介质	文献
416	850	10	375	170	5	FS	[28]
95	230	18.5	84	35	6	FS	[31]
34	300	0.2	30	31	10	FS	[32]
112	1240	1	65	39	31	FS	[33]
1.6	12500	0.008	1.23	601	20	FS	[34]
24	275	0.15	24	33	8	Ar	[35]
320	730	0.1	250	56	13	Ar	[36]
550	590	0.5	530	30	19	Ar	[37]
8.6	1200	0.001	7.9	44	27	Ar	[38]
65	138	0.3	51	35	4	Ar	[39]
210	670	0.1	203	134	5	Ar	[42]

下载: 导出CSV

[1]	Mourou G 2019 Rev. Modern Phys. 91 030501 Google Scholar
[2]	Fattahi H, Barros H G, Gorjan M, Nubbemeyer T, Alsaif B, Teisset C Y, Schultze M, Prinz S, Haefner M, Ueffing M, Alismail A, Vámos L, Schwarz A, Pronin O, Brons J, Geng X T, Arisholm G, Ciappina M, Yakovlev V S, Kim D E, Azzeer A M, Karpowicz N, Sutter D, Major Z, Metzger T, Krausz F 2014 Optica 1 45 Google Scholar
[3]	Strickland D, Mourou G 1985 Opt. Commun. 55 447 Google Scholar
[4]	Brabec T, Krausz F 2000 Rev. Modern Phys. 72 545 Google Scholar
[5]	Kärtner F X, Morgner U, Ell R, Ippen E P, Fujimoto J G, Scheuer V, Angelow, Tschudi T 2001 The 4th Pacific Rim Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Chiba, Japan, July 15–19, 2001 pTuJ3_1
[6]	Li W Q, Gan Z B, Yu L H, Wang C, Liu Y Q, Guo Z, Xu L, Xu M, Hang Y, Xu Y, Wang Z Y, Huang P, Cao P, Yao B, Zhang X B, Chen L R, Tang Y H, Li S, Liu X Y, Li S M, He M Z, Yin D J, Liang X Y, Leng Y X, Li R X, Xu Z Z 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 5681 Google Scholar
[7]	Bagnoud V, Salin F 2000 Appl. Phys. B 70 S165 Google Scholar
[8]	Sun D, Gao J, Wang W, Du X, Gao Y X, Gao Z C, Liang X Y 2021 IEEE Photonics J. 13 1 Google Scholar
[9]	Schneider W, Ryabov A, Lombosi C S, Metzger T, Major Z S, Fülöp Z A, Baum P 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 6604 Google Scholar
[10]	Wang D, Du Y L, Wu Y C, Xu L, An X C, Cao L Q, Li M, Wang J T, Sahng J L, Zhou T J, Tong LX, Gao Q S, Zhang K, Tang C, Zhu R H 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 3838 Google Scholar
[11]	Gao Q S, Zhou T J, Shang J L, Wang D, Li M, Wu Y C, Wang J T, Wang Y N, Xu L, Du Y L, Chen X M, Zhang K, Tang C 2020 High Power and Particle Beams 32 121009 Google Scholar
[12]	Russbueldt P, Mans T, Weitenberg J, Hoffmann H D, Poprawe P 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 4169 Google Scholar
[13]	Veselis L, Bartulevicius T, Madeikis K, Michailovas A, Rusteika N 2018 Opt. Express 26 31873 Google Scholar
[14]	Knall J M, Engholm M, Boilard T, Bernier M, Digonnet M J 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 013903 Google Scholar
[15]	高清松, 胡浩, 裴正平, 童立新, 周唐建, 唐淳 2012 中国激光 39 7 Gao Q S, Hu H, Pei Z P, Tong L X, Zhou T J, Tang C 2012 Chin. J. Lasers 39 7
[16]	Dietz T, Jenne M, Bauer D, Scharun M, Sutter D, Killi A 2020 Opt. Express 28 11415 Google Scholar
[17]	王海林, 董静, 刘贺言, 郝婧婕, 朱晓, 张金伟 2021 光子学报 50 117 Google Scholar Wang H L, Dong J, Liu H Y, Hao J J, Zhu X, Zhang J W 2021 Acta Photonica Sin. 50 117 Google Scholar
[18]	Nubbemeyer T, Kaumanns M, Ueffing M, Gorjan M, Alismail A, Fattahi H, Brons J, Pronin O, Barros H G, Major Z, Metzger T, Sutter D, Krausz F 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 1381 Google Scholar
[19]	董雪岩, 李平雪, 李舜, 王婷婷, 杨敏 2021 中国激光 48 41 Google Scholar Dong X Y, Li P X, Li Y, Wang T T, Yang M 2021 Chin. J. Lasers 48 41 Google Scholar
[20]	Khazanov E A 2022 Quantum Electron. 52 208 Google Scholar
[21]	Nagy T, Simon P, Veisz L 2021 Adv. Phys. X 6 1845795 Google Scholar
[22]	Viotti A L, Seidel M, Escoto E, Rajhans S, Leemans W P, Hartl I, Heyl C M 2022 Optica 9 197 Google Scholar
[23]	Jocher C, Eidam T, Hädrich S, Limpert J, Tünnermann A 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 4407 Google Scholar
[24]	Nisoli M, De Silvestri S, Svelto O 1996 Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 2793 Google Scholar
[25]	Hädrich S, Krebs M, Hoffmann A, Klenke A, Rothhardt J, Limpert J, Tünnermann A 2015 Light Sci. Appl. 4 e320 Google Scholar
[26]	Rothhardt J, Hädrich S, Carstens H, Herrick N, Demmler S, Limpert J, Tünnermann A 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 4605 Google Scholar
[27]	Herriott D, Kogelnik H, Kompfner R 1964 Appl. Opt. 3 523 Google Scholar
[28]	Schulte J, Sartorius T, Weitenberg J, Vernaleken A, Russbueldt P 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 4511 Google Scholar
[29]	Grebing C, Müller M, Buldt J, Stark H, Limpert J 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 6250 Google Scholar
[30]	Kaumanns M, Kormin D, Nubbemeyer T, Pervak V, Karsch S 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 929 Google Scholar
[31]	Weitenberg J, Saule T, Schulte J, Russbueldt P 2017 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 53 1 Google Scholar
[32]	Raab A K, Seidel M, Guo C, Sytcevich I, Arisholm G, Anne L H, Cord L A, Viotti A L 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 5084 Google Scholar
[33]	Seidel M, Balla P, Li C, Arisholm G, Winkelmann L, Hartl I, Heyl C M 2022 Ultraf. Sci. 17 9754919 Google Scholar
[34]	Song J J, Wang Z H, Wang X Z, Lü R C, Teng H, Zhu J F, Wei Z Y 2021 Chin. Opt. Lett. 19 093201 Google Scholar
[35]	Lavenu L, Natile M, Guichard F, Zaouter Y, Delen X, Hanna M, Mottay E, Georges P 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 2252 Google Scholar
[36]	Viotti A L, Alisauskas S, Tünnermann H, Escoto E, Seidel M, Dudde K, Manschwetus B, Hartl I, Christoph M H 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 4686 Google Scholar
[37]	Russbueldt P, Weitenberg J, Schulte J, Meyer R, Meinhardt C, Hoffmann H D, Poprawe R 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 5222 Google Scholar
[38]	Rajhans S, Velpula P K, Escoto E, Shalloo R, Farace B, Põder K, Osterhoff J, Leemans W P, Hartl I, Heyl C M 2021 Advanced Solid State Lasers Washington, DC, USA, October 3–7, 2021 paper AW2A.6
[39]	Gierschke P, Grebing C, Abdelaal M, Lenski M, Buldt J, Wang Z, Heuermann T, Mueller M, Gebhardt M, Rothhardt J, Limpert J 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 3511.Google Scholar
[40]	Balla P, Wahid A B, Sytcevich I, Guo C, Viotti A L, Silletti L, Cartella A, Alisauskas S, Tavakol H, Grosse-Wortmann U, Schönberg A, Seidel M, Trabattoni A, Manschwetus B, Lang T, Calegari F, Couairon A, L’Huillier A, Arnold C L, Hartl I, Heyl C M 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 2572 Google Scholar
[41]	Viotti A L, Li C, Arisholm G, Winkelmann L, Hartl I, Heyl C M, Seidel M 2023 Opt. Lett. 48 984 Google Scholar
[42]	Omar A, Vogel T, Hoffmann M, Saraceno C J 2023 Opt. Lett. 48 1458 Google Scholar
[43]	Heyl C M, Seidel M, Escoto E, Schönberg A, Carlström S, Arisholm G, Lang T, Hartl I 2022 J. Phys. Photonics 4 014002 Google Scholar
[44]	Tsai C L, Meyer F, Omar A, Wang Y C, Liang A X, Lu C H, Hoffmann M, Yang S D, Saraceno C J 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 4115 Google Scholar
[45]	Lavenu L, Natile M, Guichard F, Délen X, Hanna M, Zaouter Y, Georges P 2019 Opt. Express 27 1958 Google Scholar
[46]	Daniault L, Cheng Z, Kaur J, Hergott J F, Réau F, Tcherbakoff O, Daher N, Délen X, Hanna M, Rodrigo L M 2021 Opt. Lett. 46 5264 Google Scholar

[1]	王井上, 王栋梁, 常国庆. 基于色散管理的自相位调制光谱展宽滤波技术. 物理学报, 2023, 72(9): 094205. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230088
[2]	李伟, 王逍, 洪义麟, 曾小明, 母杰, 胡必龙, 左言磊, 吴朝辉, 王晓东, 李钊历, 粟敬钦. 基于空谱干涉和频域分割的超快激光时空耦合特性的单次测量方法. 物理学报, 2022, 71(3): 034203. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211665
[3]	龙天洋, 李伟, 许浩天, 王逍. 时空耦合畸变对超快超强激光参数测试及性能评估的影响. 物理学报, 2022, 71(17): 174204. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220563
[4]	王晓英, 邢宇婷, 陈润植, 贾雪琦, 吴继华, 江进, 李连勇, 常国庆. 基于自相位调制光谱选择驱动的无标记自发荧光多倍频显微镜系统. 物理学报, 2022, 71(10): 104204. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212282
[5]	王佳强, 吴志芳, 冯素春. 正常色散高非线性石英光纤优化设计及平坦光频率梳产生. 物理学报, 2022, 71(23): 234209. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221115
[6]	李伟, 王逍, 洪义麟, 曾小明, 母杰, 胡必龙, 左言磊, 吴朝辉, 王晓东, 李钊历, 粟敬钦. 基于空谱干涉和频域分割的超快激光时空耦合特性的单次测量方法. 物理学报, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211665
[7]	盛泉, 王盟, 史朝督, 田浩, 张钧翔, 刘俊杰, 史伟, 姚建铨. 基于锯齿波脉冲抑制自相位调制的高功率窄线宽单频脉冲光纤激光放大器. 物理学报, 2021, 70(21): 214202. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210496
[8]	龙慧, 胡建伟, 吴福根, 董华锋. 基于二维材料异质结可饱和吸收体的超快激光器. 物理学报, 2020, 69(18): 188102. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201235
[9]	粟荣涛, 肖虎, 周朴, 王小林, 马阎星, 段磊, 吕品, 许晓军. 窄线宽脉冲光纤激光的自相位调制预补偿研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(16): 164201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180486
[10]	江俊峰, 黄灿, 刘琨, 张永宁, 王双, 张学智, 马喆, 陈文杰, 于哲, 刘铁根. 用于CARS激发源的全光纤飞秒脉冲谱压缩. 物理学报, 2017, 66(20): 204207. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.204207
[11]	石俊凯, 柴路, 赵晓薇, 李江, 刘博文, 胡明列, 栗岩锋, 王清月. 光子晶体光纤飞秒激光非线性放大系统的耦合动力学过程研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(9): 094203. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.094203
[12]	洪伟毅. 强时间非局域系统中自相位调制诱导的“脉冲镜像”啁啾. 物理学报, 2015, 64(2): 024214. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.024214
[13]	刘华刚, 黄见洪, 翁文, 李锦辉, 郑晖, 戴殊韬, 赵显, 王继扬, 林文雄. 高功率全正色散锁模掺Yb3+双包层光纤飞秒激光器. 物理学报, 2012, 61(15): 154210. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.154210
[14]	牛海亮, 章岳光, 沈伟东, 余鹏, 李旸晖, 刘旭. 飞秒激光器中超宽带色散补偿啁啾镜对的设计. 物理学报, 2012, 61(1): 014211. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.014211
[15]	韩庆生, 乔耀军, 李蔚. 基于全光时域分数阶傅里叶变换的光脉冲最小损伤传输新方法. 物理学报, 2011, 60(1): 014219. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.014219
[16]	马文文, 李曙光, 尹国冰, 冯荣普, 付博. 反常色散锥形微结构光纤中高效率脉冲压缩研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(7): 4720-4725. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4720
[17]	陈泳竹, 李玉忠, 徐文成. 色散平坦渐减光纤产生平坦超宽超连续谱的特性研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(12): 7693-7698. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7693
[18]	夏舸, 黄德修, 元秀华. 正常色散平坦光纤中皮秒抽运脉冲超连续谱的形成研究. 物理学报, 2007, 56(4): 2212-2217. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2212
[19]	步扬, 王向朝. 基于频域相位共轭技术的交叉相位调制所致失真的复原. 物理学报, 2005, 54(10): 4747-4753. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4747
[20]	吴国华, 郭弘, 刘明伟, 邓冬梅, 刘时雄. 尾波场与相对论效应对激光脉冲自相位调制及频移影响的比较研究. 物理学报, 2005, 54(7): 3213-3220. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3213

计量

文章访问数: 1891
PDF下载量: 78
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板