Stability analysis and fundamental diagram of heterogeneous traffic flow mixed with cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicles

Qin Yan-Yan; Wang Hao; Wang Wei; Wan Qian

doi:10.7498/aps.66.094502

Abstract

This paper is aimed at building a framework for string stability analysis of traffic flow mixed with different cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) market penetration rates. In addition to the string stability, the fundamental diagram of the mixed flow is also taken into consideration for evaluating the effect of CACC vehicles on capacity. In order to describe the car-following dynamics of real CACC vehicles, the CACC model proposed by PATH is employed, which is validated by real experimental data. The intelligent driver model (IDM) is used as a surrogate car-following model for traditional manual driven vehicles. Based on the guidelines proposed by Ward[Ward J A 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (Bristol:University of Bristol)], a framework is developed for the analytical investigation of heterogeneous traffic flow string stability. The framework presented considers the instability condition of traffic flow as a linear function of CACC market penetration rate. Following the framework, the string stabilities of the mixed traffic flow under different CACC market penetration rates and equilibrium velocities are analyzed. For fundamental diagram of the heterogeneous traffic flow, the equilibrium velocity-spacing functions of manual vehicles and CACC vehicles are obtained respectively based on car-following model. Then, the fundamental diagram of the density-velocity relationship of the heterogeneous traffic flow is derived based on the definition of traffic flow density. In addition, the theoretical fundamental diagram is plotted to show the property of traffic throughput. The numerical simulations are also carried out in order to investigate the effect of CACC vehicle on the characteristics of fundamental diagram. Besides, sensitivity analyses on CACC desired time gap are conducted for both string stability and fundamental diagram. Analytical studies and simulation results are as follows. 1) The heterogeneous traffic flow is stable for different equilibrium velocities and CACC market penetration rates, if manual driven vehicles are stable. Otherwise, the instability of traditional traffic flow is improved gradually with the increase of the CACC market penetration rate. Additionally, the stability will become better when equilibrium velocity is away from the velocity range of 9.6-18.6 m/s. 2) Because CACC vehicles can travel at free-flow speed in a relatively small headway, CACC vehicles can improve the capacity of heterogeneous traffic flow. 3) The results of sensitivity analysis indicate that with the increase of the CACC desired time gap, the stable region of heterogeneous traffic flow increases. However, the capacity of the fundamental diagram drops. Therefore, the value of the desired time gap should be determined with considering the effects of the two aspects on the heterogeneous traffic flow. It is noted that the CACC model used in this paper is based on the current state-of-the-art real CACC vehicle experiments. In the future, more experimental observations will yield new CACC models. However, the framework presented in this paper can still be used for the analytical investigation of string stability of the heterogeneous traffic flow at that time.

Keywords:

PACS:

45.70.Vn	(Granular models of complex systems; traffic flow)
89.40.-a	(Transportation)

Authors and contacts

1.
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China;
2.
Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Nanjing 210096, China;
3.
Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China;
4.
Hualan Design and Consulting Group, Nanning 530011, China

Corresponding author: Wang Hao, haowang@seu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51478113, 51508122), the Foundation for Excellent Young Scientists of Southeast University, China (Grant No. 2242015R30028), and the Guangxi Science and Technology Project, China (Grant No. 15248002-10).

References

[1]	Tang T Q, Yi Z Y, Lin Q F 2017 Physica A 469 200
[2]	Ranjitkar P, Nakatsuji T, Kawamura A 2005 Transp. Res. Rec. 1934 22
[3]	Jiang R, Hu M B, Zhang H M, Gao Z Y, Jia B, Wu Q S 2015 Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 80 338
[4]	Pueboobpaphan R, van Arem B 2010 Transp. Res. Rec. 2189 89
[5]	Kerner B S 2016 Physica A 450 700
[6]	Naus G J L, Vugts R P A, Ploeg J, Molengraft M J G, Steinbuch M 2010 IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 59 4268
[7]	Milans V, Shladover S E, Spring J, Nowakowski C, Kawazoe H, Nakamura M 2014 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 15 296
[8]	Milans V, Villagr J, Prez J, Gonzlez C 2012 IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 59 620
[9]	Jin I G, Orosz G 2014 Transp. Res. C 46 46
[10]	Tang T Q, Chen L, Yang S C, Shang H Y 2015 Physica A 430 148
[11]	Ge H X, Cui Y, Zhu K Q, Cheng R J 2015 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 22 903
[12]	Ge H X, Zheng P J, Wang W, Cheng R J 2015 Physica A 433 274
[13]	Tang T Q, Li J G, Yang S C, Shang H Y 2015 Physica A 419 293
[14]	Sau J, Monteil J, Billot R, Faouzi N E E 2014 Transp. B: Transp. Dyn. 2 60
[15]	Wang M, Daamen W, Hoogendoorn S P, van Arem B 2016 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17 1459
[16]	van Arem B, van Driel C J G, Visser R 2006 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 7 429
[17]	Tang T Q, Xu K W, Yang S C, Ding C 2016 Physica A 441 221
[18]	Jerath K, Brennan S N 2012 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 13 1782
[19]	Tang T Q, Yu Q, Yang S C, Ding C 2015 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 29 1550157
[20]	Milans V, Shladover S E 2014 Transp. Res. C 48 285
[21]	Ge H X, Cheng R J, Li Z P 2008 Physica A 387 5239
[22]	Yu S, Shi Z 2015 Physica A 428 206
[23]	Hua X D, Wang W, Wang H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 010502 (in Chinese) [华雪东, 王炜, 王昊 2016 物理学报 65 010502]
[24]	Hua X D, Wang W, Wang H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 084503 (in Chinese) [华雪东, 王炜, 王昊 2016 物理学报 65 084503]
[25]	Ward J A 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (Bristol: University of Bristol)
[26]	Treiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D 2000 Phys. Rev. E 62 1805
[27]	Kesting A, Treiber M, Schnhof M, Helbing D 2008 Transp. Res. C 16 668
[28]	Shladover S, Su D, Lu X Y 2012 Transp. Res. Rec. 2324 63
[29]	Ma X, Zheng W F, Jiang B S, Zhang J Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 108902
[30]	Wilson R E 2008 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366 2017
[31]	Zheng Y Z, Cheng R J, Lu Z M, Ge H X 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 060506
[32]	Zheng W F, Zhang J Y 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 058902
[33]	Ge H X, Meng X P, Zhu K Q, Cheng R J 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 080505
[34]	Tang T Q, Li C Y, Huang H J 2010 Phys. Lett. A 374 3951
[35]	Liu Y J, Zhang H L, He L 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 104502
[36]	Oh S, Yeo H 2012 Transp. Res. Rec. 2286 111

Cited By

期刊类型引用(36)

1.	赵尚飞，杜文举. 多类时延下复杂混合交通流基本图与稳定性分析. 计算机工程与应用. 2025(03): 336-348 . 百度学术
2.	郭暖，黄中祥，张生. CAV车辆与HDV车辆混合交通流基本图模型. 系统工程. 2025(01): 101-109 . 百度学术
3.	宋成举，贾洪飞，秦昊溥. 网联车混入条件下混合交通流跟驰稳定性. 吉林大学学报(工学版). 2024(02): 419-426 . 百度学术
4.	张卫华，刘嘉茗，解立鹏，丁恒. 网联混合环境快速路交织区自动驾驶车辆换道模型. 吉林大学学报(工学版). 2024(02): 469-477 . 百度学术
5.	魏丽英，吴润泽. 基于鱼群效应的智能网联车队形成与演化机理研究. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2024(02): 76-85 . 百度学术
6.	梁军，杨航，任彬彬，陈小波，陈龙，杨相峰. 融入智能网联汽车的混行交通流混沌特性. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 373-380 . 百度学术
7.	王杰，赵辉，郭志龙，惠子文，王威民. 智能交通系统中基于双速度差的新型车辆队列跟随模型研究. 甘肃科技纵横. 2024(07): 69-76 . 百度学术
8.	罗瑞发，郝慧君，徐桃让，顾秋凡. 考虑智能网联车队强度的混合交通流基本图模型. 吉林大学学报(工学版). 2023(02): 405-412 . 百度学术
9.	张卫华，刘嘉茗，解立鹏，丁恒. 混合网联环境快速路交织区交通流特性分析. 东南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(01): 156-164 . 百度学术
10.	吴德华，彭锐，陈荣峰. 异质流网联车的不同换道集聚策略. 西南交通大学学报. 2023(02): 348-356 . 百度学术
11.	谢庆元，吴其育，余亦彧. 不同交通管理策略下异质交通流稳定性分析. 交通科学与工程. 2023(06): 123-133 . 百度学术
12.	Rong Fei，Lu Yang，Xinhong Hei，Bo Hu，Aimin Li. A car-following model based on the optimized velocity and its security analysis. Transportation Safety and Environment. 2023(04): 407-414 . 必应学术
13.	王伊欣，张希，刘冶. 智能网联环境下城市路网通行能力分析. 公路. 2022(03): 225-231 . 百度学术
14.	姚志洪，顾秋凡，徐桃让，蒋阳升，涂丹. 考虑时延的智能网联汽车混合交通流稳定性分析. 控制与决策. 2022(06): 1505-1512 . 百度学术
15.	郝威，俞海杰，高志波，张兆磊，黄中祥. 自动驾驶专用车道影响下的CACC车流管理策略. 中国公路学报. 2022(04): 230-242 . 百度学术
16.	吴德华，彭锐，林熙玲. 智能网联异质交通流混合特性. 西南交通大学学报. 2022(04): 761-768 . 百度学术
17.	宋成举，王连震，赵静. 混合交通流跟驰建模及多状态仿真. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版). 2022(04): 609-613+618 . 百度学术
18.	张宇琳，尚可，张飞舟. 基于数字孪生技术的异质交通流安全性研究. 北京大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(05): 888-896 . 百度学术
19.	祝可为，陈荣峰. 高速公路隧道与互通立交衔接段异质交通流演化规律. 陕西理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(05): 32-38 . 百度学术
20.	蒋阳升，顾秋凡，姚志洪. 智能网联混合交通流稳定性解析方法综述. 西南交通大学学报. 2022(05): 927-940 . 百度学术
21.	单肖年，万长薪，李志斌，张小丽，曹昌衡. 智能网联环境下多车道异质交通流建模与仿真. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2022(06): 74-84 . 百度学术
22.	李晔，黄弘勇. 完整街道扫描仪：智慧城市人居环境感知新技术. 综合运输. 2021(01): 50-56 . 百度学术
23.	胡笳，安连华，李欣. 面向新型混合交通流的快速路合流区通行能力建模. 交通信息与安全. 2021(01): 137-144 . 百度学术
24.	金世文，何海成，王海晨. 高速公路混合车流对交通的影响因素分析. 电子设计工程. 2021(18): 121-125+130 . 百度学术
25.	马庆禄，傅宝宇，曾皓威. 智能网联环境下异质交通流基本图和稳定性分析. 交通信息与安全. 2021(05): 76-84 . 百度学术
26.	吴德华，陈家伟，彭锐，赵明鹃. 快速路上匝道瓶颈路段异质交通流演变规律. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(04): 99-104 . 百度学术
27.	常鑫，李海舰，荣建，秦伶巧，杨艳芳. 混有智能网联车队的交通流基本图模型分析. 东南大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(04): 782-788 . 百度学术
28.	徐桃让，姚志洪，蒋阳升，杨涛. 智能网联车环境下考虑反应时间影响的基本图模型. 公路交通科技. 2020(08): 108-117 . 百度学术
29.	常鑫，李海舰，荣建，赵晓华，王益. 混有智能网联车辆交通流车道管理策略研究. 交通工程. 2020(05): 38-43+48 . 百度学术
30.	李霞，汪一戈，崔洪军，朱敏清，王欣桐. 智能网联环境下复杂异质交通流稳定性解析. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2020(06): 114-120 . 百度学术
31.	秦严严，王昊，何兆益，冉斌. 自动驾驶汽车交通流稳定性分析. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(12): 20-25 . 百度学术
32.	常鑫，李海舰，荣建，赵晓华，赵国强. 混有网联车辆的交通流稳定性和最大服务流率分析. 西华大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(06): 32-37 . 百度学术
33.	秦严严，胡兴华，何兆益，冉斌. CACC车头时距与混合交通流稳定性的解析关系. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2019(06): 61-67 . 百度学术
34.	董长印，王昊，王炜，李烨，华雪东. 混入智能车的下匝道瓶颈路段交通流建模与仿真分析. 物理学报. 2018(14): 179-193 . 百度学术
35.	秦严严，王昊，王炜. 智能网联环境下的混合交通流LWR模型. 中国公路学报. 2018(11): 147-156 . 百度学术
36.	秦严严，王昊，冉斌. CACC车辆跟驰建模及混合交通流分析. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2018(02): 60-65 . 百度学术

其他类型引用(58)

[1]	Tang T Q, Yi Z Y, Lin Q F 2017 Physica A 469 200
[2]	Ranjitkar P, Nakatsuji T, Kawamura A 2005 Transp. Res. Rec. 1934 22
[3]	Jiang R, Hu M B, Zhang H M, Gao Z Y, Jia B, Wu Q S 2015 Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 80 338
[4]	Pueboobpaphan R, van Arem B 2010 Transp. Res. Rec. 2189 89
[5]	Kerner B S 2016 Physica A 450 700
[6]	Naus G J L, Vugts R P A, Ploeg J, Molengraft M J G, Steinbuch M 2010 IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 59 4268
[7]	Milans V, Shladover S E, Spring J, Nowakowski C, Kawazoe H, Nakamura M 2014 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 15 296
[8]	Milans V, Villagr J, Prez J, Gonzlez C 2012 IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 59 620
[9]	Jin I G, Orosz G 2014 Transp. Res. C 46 46
[10]	Tang T Q, Chen L, Yang S C, Shang H Y 2015 Physica A 430 148
[11]	Ge H X, Cui Y, Zhu K Q, Cheng R J 2015 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 22 903
[12]	Ge H X, Zheng P J, Wang W, Cheng R J 2015 Physica A 433 274
[13]	Tang T Q, Li J G, Yang S C, Shang H Y 2015 Physica A 419 293
[14]	Sau J, Monteil J, Billot R, Faouzi N E E 2014 Transp. B: Transp. Dyn. 2 60
[15]	Wang M, Daamen W, Hoogendoorn S P, van Arem B 2016 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17 1459
[16]	van Arem B, van Driel C J G, Visser R 2006 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 7 429
[17]	Tang T Q, Xu K W, Yang S C, Ding C 2016 Physica A 441 221
[18]	Jerath K, Brennan S N 2012 IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 13 1782
[19]	Tang T Q, Yu Q, Yang S C, Ding C 2015 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 29 1550157
[20]	Milans V, Shladover S E 2014 Transp. Res. C 48 285
[21]	Ge H X, Cheng R J, Li Z P 2008 Physica A 387 5239
[22]	Yu S, Shi Z 2015 Physica A 428 206
[23]	Hua X D, Wang W, Wang H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 010502 (in Chinese) [华雪东, 王炜, 王昊 2016 物理学报 65 010502]
[24]	Hua X D, Wang W, Wang H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 084503 (in Chinese) [华雪东, 王炜, 王昊 2016 物理学报 65 084503]
[25]	Ward J A 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (Bristol: University of Bristol)
[26]	Treiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D 2000 Phys. Rev. E 62 1805
[27]	Kesting A, Treiber M, Schnhof M, Helbing D 2008 Transp. Res. C 16 668
[28]	Shladover S, Su D, Lu X Y 2012 Transp. Res. Rec. 2324 63
[29]	Ma X, Zheng W F, Jiang B S, Zhang J Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 108902
[30]	Wilson R E 2008 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366 2017
[31]	Zheng Y Z, Cheng R J, Lu Z M, Ge H X 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 060506
[32]	Zheng W F, Zhang J Y 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 058902
[33]	Ge H X, Meng X P, Zhu K Q, Cheng R J 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 080505
[34]	Tang T Q, Li C Y, Huang H J 2010 Phys. Lett. A 374 3951
[35]	Liu Y J, Zhang H L, He L 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 104502
[36]	Oh S, Yeo H 2012 Transp. Res. Rec. 2286 111

[1]	Zhang Qi, Qu Jing. Impatient behavior modelling and simulation of bidirectional pedestrian flow dynamics based on proactive effect. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(7): 070502. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211537
[2]	Duan Liang, Liu Chong, Zhao Li-Chen, Yang Zhan-Ying. Quantitative relations between fundamental nonlinear waves and modulation instability. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(1): 010501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191385
[3]	Liu Qiang, Luo Zhen-Bing, Deng Xiong, Yang Sheng-Ke, Jiang Hao. Linear stability of supersonic boundary layer with synthetic cold/hot jet control. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(23): 234701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.234701
[4]	Hua Xue-Dong, Wang Wei, Wang Hao. A hybrid traffic flow model with considering the influence of adaptive cruise control vehicles and on-ramps. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(8): 084503. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.084503
[5]	Zhu Lin-He, Zhao Hong-Yong. Stability and bifurcation control in inertial neuron networks with delays. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(9): 090203. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.090203
[6]	Zeng You-Zhi, Zhang Ning. Effects of comprehensive information of the nearest following vehicle on traffic flow instability. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(21): 218901. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.218901
[7]	Hu Jian-Bing, Zhao Ling-Dong. Stability theorem and control of fractional systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(24): 240504. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.240504
[8]	Wang Jing, Feng Lu, Hao Yi, Zhao Yang, Chen Zhen-Fei. Strain effect on the morphological instability of a circular island in heteroepitaxy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(23): 238102. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.238102
[9]	Lu Yan-Ling, Jiang Guo-Ping, Song Yu-Rong. Stability and bifurcation of epidemic spreading on adaptive network. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(13): 130202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.130202
[10]	Hu Nai-Hong, Zhou Yu-Fei, Chen Jun-Ning. Control of fast-scale bifurcation in single-phase SPWM inverter and its stability analysis. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(13): 130504. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.130504
[11]	Cao Jian-Min, He Wei, Huang Si-Wen, Zhang Xu-Lin. Dependence of the DC stress negative bias temperature instability effect on basic device parameters in pMOSFET. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(21): 217305. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.217305
[12]	Liu Shi-Xu, Guan Hong-Zhi, Yan Hai. Chaotic behavior in the dynamical evolution of network traffic flow and its control. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(9): 090506. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.090506
[13]	Zhang Li-Dong, Jia Lei, Zhu Wen-Xing. Curved road traffic flow car-following model and stability analysis. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(7): 074501. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.074501
[14]	Jia Ning, Ma Shou-Feng. Comparison between the optimal velocity model and the Nagel-Schreckenberg model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(2): 832-841. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.832
[15]	Teng Ya-Fan, Gao Zi-You, Jia Bin, Li Feng. Study on the traffic behavior of on-ramp system with two-lane main road under signal controlling. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(3): 1365-1374. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.1365
[16]	Li Wei, Xu Wei, Zhao Jun-Feng, Jin Yan-Fei. Stochastic stability and control of coupled Duffing-van der Pol systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(12): 5559-5565. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5559
[17]	Chen Yan－Hong, Xue Yu. Effects of the stochastic delay probability on traffic flow. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(12): 4145-4150. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.4145*
[18]	Tan Hui-Li, Huang Ping-Hua, Li Hua-Bing, Liu Mu-Ren, Kong Ling-Jiang. A study on the traffic flow of the main road under the traffic light control. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(5): 1127-1131. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1127
[19]	LI ZHI, HAN CHONG-ZHAO. ADAPTIVE CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF CHAOTIC SYSTEMS WITH UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(5): 847-850. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.847
[20]	HAI WEN-HUA, DUAN YI-WU, ZHU XI-WEN, SHI LEI, LUO XUE-LI, HE CHUN-SHAN. CONTROLLING OF THE INSTABILITY OF-CHAOTIC MOTION IN AN ION CLOUD. Acta Physica Sinica, 1997, 46(11): 2117-2123. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.2117

期刊类型引用(36)

1.	赵尚飞，杜文举. 多类时延下复杂混合交通流基本图与稳定性分析. 计算机工程与应用. 2025(03): 336-348 . 百度学术
2.	郭暖，黄中祥，张生. CAV车辆与HDV车辆混合交通流基本图模型. 系统工程. 2025(01): 101-109 . 百度学术
3.	宋成举，贾洪飞，秦昊溥. 网联车混入条件下混合交通流跟驰稳定性. 吉林大学学报(工学版). 2024(02): 419-426 . 百度学术
4.	张卫华，刘嘉茗，解立鹏，丁恒. 网联混合环境快速路交织区自动驾驶车辆换道模型. 吉林大学学报(工学版). 2024(02): 469-477 . 百度学术
5.	魏丽英，吴润泽. 基于鱼群效应的智能网联车队形成与演化机理研究. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2024(02): 76-85 . 百度学术
6.	梁军，杨航，任彬彬，陈小波，陈龙，杨相峰. 融入智能网联汽车的混行交通流混沌特性. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 373-380 . 百度学术
7.	王杰，赵辉，郭志龙，惠子文，王威民. 智能交通系统中基于双速度差的新型车辆队列跟随模型研究. 甘肃科技纵横. 2024(07): 69-76 . 百度学术
8.	罗瑞发，郝慧君，徐桃让，顾秋凡. 考虑智能网联车队强度的混合交通流基本图模型. 吉林大学学报(工学版). 2023(02): 405-412 . 百度学术
9.	张卫华，刘嘉茗，解立鹏，丁恒. 混合网联环境快速路交织区交通流特性分析. 东南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(01): 156-164 . 百度学术
10.	吴德华，彭锐，陈荣峰. 异质流网联车的不同换道集聚策略. 西南交通大学学报. 2023(02): 348-356 . 百度学术
11.	谢庆元，吴其育，余亦彧. 不同交通管理策略下异质交通流稳定性分析. 交通科学与工程. 2023(06): 123-133 . 百度学术
12.	Rong Fei，Lu Yang，Xinhong Hei，Bo Hu，Aimin Li. A car-following model based on the optimized velocity and its security analysis. Transportation Safety and Environment. 2023(04): 407-414 . 必应学术
13.	王伊欣，张希，刘冶. 智能网联环境下城市路网通行能力分析. 公路. 2022(03): 225-231 . 百度学术
14.	姚志洪，顾秋凡，徐桃让，蒋阳升，涂丹. 考虑时延的智能网联汽车混合交通流稳定性分析. 控制与决策. 2022(06): 1505-1512 . 百度学术
15.	郝威，俞海杰，高志波，张兆磊，黄中祥. 自动驾驶专用车道影响下的CACC车流管理策略. 中国公路学报. 2022(04): 230-242 . 百度学术
16.	吴德华，彭锐，林熙玲. 智能网联异质交通流混合特性. 西南交通大学学报. 2022(04): 761-768 . 百度学术
17.	宋成举，王连震，赵静. 混合交通流跟驰建模及多状态仿真. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版). 2022(04): 609-613+618 . 百度学术
18.	张宇琳，尚可，张飞舟. 基于数字孪生技术的异质交通流安全性研究. 北京大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(05): 888-896 . 百度学术
19.	祝可为，陈荣峰. 高速公路隧道与互通立交衔接段异质交通流演化规律. 陕西理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(05): 32-38 . 百度学术
20.	蒋阳升，顾秋凡，姚志洪. 智能网联混合交通流稳定性解析方法综述. 西南交通大学学报. 2022(05): 927-940 . 百度学术
21.	单肖年，万长薪，李志斌，张小丽，曹昌衡. 智能网联环境下多车道异质交通流建模与仿真. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2022(06): 74-84 . 百度学术
22.	李晔，黄弘勇. 完整街道扫描仪：智慧城市人居环境感知新技术. 综合运输. 2021(01): 50-56 . 百度学术
23.	胡笳，安连华，李欣. 面向新型混合交通流的快速路合流区通行能力建模. 交通信息与安全. 2021(01): 137-144 . 百度学术
24.	金世文，何海成，王海晨. 高速公路混合车流对交通的影响因素分析. 电子设计工程. 2021(18): 121-125+130 . 百度学术
25.	马庆禄，傅宝宇，曾皓威. 智能网联环境下异质交通流基本图和稳定性分析. 交通信息与安全. 2021(05): 76-84 . 百度学术
26.	吴德华，陈家伟，彭锐，赵明鹃. 快速路上匝道瓶颈路段异质交通流演变规律. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(04): 99-104 . 百度学术
27.	常鑫，李海舰，荣建，秦伶巧，杨艳芳. 混有智能网联车队的交通流基本图模型分析. 东南大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(04): 782-788 . 百度学术
28.	徐桃让，姚志洪，蒋阳升，杨涛. 智能网联车环境下考虑反应时间影响的基本图模型. 公路交通科技. 2020(08): 108-117 . 百度学术
29.	常鑫，李海舰，荣建，赵晓华，王益. 混有智能网联车辆交通流车道管理策略研究. 交通工程. 2020(05): 38-43+48 . 百度学术
30.	李霞，汪一戈，崔洪军，朱敏清，王欣桐. 智能网联环境下复杂异质交通流稳定性解析. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2020(06): 114-120 . 百度学术
31.	秦严严，王昊，何兆益，冉斌. 自动驾驶汽车交通流稳定性分析. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(12): 20-25 . 百度学术
32.	常鑫，李海舰，荣建，赵晓华，赵国强. 混有网联车辆的交通流稳定性和最大服务流率分析. 西华大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(06): 32-37 . 百度学术
33.	秦严严，胡兴华，何兆益，冉斌. CACC车头时距与混合交通流稳定性的解析关系. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2019(06): 61-67 . 百度学术
34.	董长印，王昊，王炜，李烨，华雪东. 混入智能车的下匝道瓶颈路段交通流建模与仿真分析. 物理学报. 2018(14): 179-193 . 百度学术
35.	秦严严，王昊，王炜. 智能网联环境下的混合交通流LWR模型. 中国公路学报. 2018(11): 147-156 . 百度学术
36.	秦严严，王昊，冉斌. CACC车辆跟驰建模及混合交通流分析. 交通运输系统工程与信息. 2018(02): 60-65 . 百度学术

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板