-
The wave propagation is often carried out in complex geological structures. Solving the wave propagation problem effectively in inhomogeneous medium is of great interest and has many applications in physics and engineering. In this paper, the local discontinuous Galekin (LDG) method is applied to the numerical solution of the second-order wave equation. Firstly, the auxiliary variables are introduced, and the second-order wave equations are written as a system of first-order partial differential equations. Then the discontinuous Galerkin format is applied to the corresponding linearized wave equations and adjoint equations. We consider the triangulation in this paper. In order to ensure that the discrete format satisfies the energy conservation, the generalized alternating flux is chosen on the element boundary. We proves that the LDG method satisfies the energy conservation. The exponential integral factor method is used in time discretization. In order to improve the computational efficiency, the Krylov subspace method is used to approximate the product of the exponential matrix and the vector. Numerical examples with exact solutions are given in numerical experiments. The numerical results verify the numerical precision and energy conservation of the LDG method. In addition, the calculation of inhomogeneous medium and complex computational regions are considered. The results show that the LDG method is suitable for simulation of complex structures and propagation in multi-scale structured medium.
-
Keywords:
- wave equation /
- generalized alternating /
- local discontinuous Galerkin method /
- energy conservation
[1] 周聪, 王庆良 2015 物理学报 64 239101Google Scholar
Zhou C, Wang Q L 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 239101Google Scholar
[2] 王飞, 魏兵, 李林茜 2014 物理学报 63 104101Google Scholar
Wang F, Wei B, Li L X 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 104101Google Scholar
[3] 王婷, 崔志文, 刘金霞, 王克协 2018 物理学报 67 114301Google Scholar
Wang T, Cui Z W, Liu J X, Wang K X 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 114301Google Scholar
[4] Kampanis N A, Ekaterinaris J, Dougalis V 2008 Effective Computational Methods for Wave Propagation (Virginia beach: Chapman & Hall/CRC) pp135−164
[5] Sjögreen B, Anders P N 2011 J. Sci. Comput. 52 17
[6] Appelö D, Petersson N A 2009 Commun. Comput. Phys. 5 84
[7] 王同科 2010 数值计算和计算机应用 31 64
Wang T K 2010 J. Numerical Methods & Computer Applications 31 64
[8] Safjan A, Oden J 1993 Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 103 187Google Scholar
[9] Cockburn B, Shu C W 1997 SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35 2440
[10] 赵国忠, 蔚喜军 2012 物理学报 61 110208Google Scholar
Zhao G Z, Yu X J 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 110208Google Scholar
[11] Chung E, Engquist B 2009 SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 3820Google Scholar
[12] Chou C S, Shu C W, Xing Y 2014 J. Comput. Phys. 272 88Google Scholar
[13] Nie Q, Zhang Y T, Zhao R 2006 J. Comput. Phys. 214 521Google Scholar
[14] 张荣培, 王震, 王语, 韩子健 2018 物理学报 67 050503Google Scholar
Zhang R P, Wang Z, Wang Y, Han Z J 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 050503Google Scholar
[15] Wang Y, Zhang R P, Wang Z J, Han Z 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 50503Google Scholar
[16] Chen S, Zhang Y 2011 J. Comput. Phys. 230 4336Google Scholar
-
表 1 数值解
${w_h}$ 和p的误差和收敛阶数Table 1. Error and convergence order of numerical solution
${w_h}$ and p.网格数 w的误差 p的误差 ${L^2}$范数下误差 收敛阶 ${L^2}$范数下误差 收敛阶 $8 \times 8$ 2.80 × 10–2 — 6.63× 10–2 — $16 \times 16$ 5.75 × 10–3 2.28 3.40× 10–2 0.96 $32 \times 32$ 1.64 × 10–3 1.81 1.70× 10–2 1.00 $64 \times 64$ 4.62 × 10–4 1.83 8.56× 10–3 0.99 $128 \times 128$ 9.20 × 10–5 2.32 4.30 × 10–3 0.99 -
[1] 周聪, 王庆良 2015 物理学报 64 239101Google Scholar
Zhou C, Wang Q L 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 239101Google Scholar
[2] 王飞, 魏兵, 李林茜 2014 物理学报 63 104101Google Scholar
Wang F, Wei B, Li L X 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 104101Google Scholar
[3] 王婷, 崔志文, 刘金霞, 王克协 2018 物理学报 67 114301Google Scholar
Wang T, Cui Z W, Liu J X, Wang K X 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 114301Google Scholar
[4] Kampanis N A, Ekaterinaris J, Dougalis V 2008 Effective Computational Methods for Wave Propagation (Virginia beach: Chapman & Hall/CRC) pp135−164
[5] Sjögreen B, Anders P N 2011 J. Sci. Comput. 52 17
[6] Appelö D, Petersson N A 2009 Commun. Comput. Phys. 5 84
[7] 王同科 2010 数值计算和计算机应用 31 64
Wang T K 2010 J. Numerical Methods & Computer Applications 31 64
[8] Safjan A, Oden J 1993 Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 103 187Google Scholar
[9] Cockburn B, Shu C W 1997 SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35 2440
[10] 赵国忠, 蔚喜军 2012 物理学报 61 110208Google Scholar
Zhao G Z, Yu X J 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 110208Google Scholar
[11] Chung E, Engquist B 2009 SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 3820Google Scholar
[12] Chou C S, Shu C W, Xing Y 2014 J. Comput. Phys. 272 88Google Scholar
[13] Nie Q, Zhang Y T, Zhao R 2006 J. Comput. Phys. 214 521Google Scholar
[14] 张荣培, 王震, 王语, 韩子健 2018 物理学报 67 050503Google Scholar
Zhang R P, Wang Z, Wang Y, Han Z J 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 050503Google Scholar
[15] Wang Y, Zhang R P, Wang Z J, Han Z 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 50503Google Scholar
[16] Chen S, Zhang Y 2011 J. Comput. Phys. 230 4336Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 7328
- PDF Downloads: 81
- Cited By: 0