Complex network recognition of electrocardiograph signals in health and myocardial infarction patients based on multiplex visibility graph

Ma Zhi-Yi; Yang Xiao-Dong; He Ai-Jun; Ma Lu; Wang Jun

doi:10.7498/aps.71.20211656

Abstract

The visibility graph algorithm proves to be a simple and efficient method to transform time series into complex network and has been widely used in time series analysis because it can inherit the dynamic characteristics of original time series in topological structure. Now, visibility graph analysis of univariate time series has become mature gradually. However, most of complex systems in real world are multi-dimensional, so the univariate analysis is difficult to describe the global characteristics when applied to multi-dimensional series. In this paper, a novel method of analyzing the multivariate time series is proposed. For patients with myocardial infarction and healthy subjects, the 12-lead electrocardiogram signals of each individual are considered as a multivariate time series, which is transformed into a multiplex visibility graph through visibility graph algorithm and then mapped to fully connected complex network. Each node of the network corresponds to a lead, and the inter-layer mutual information between visibility graphs of two leads represents the weight of edges. Owing to the fully connected network of different groups showing an identical topological structure, the dynamic characteristics of different individuals cannot be uniquely represented. Therefore, we reconstruct the fully connected network according to inter-layer mutual information, and when the value of inter-layer mutual information is less than the threshold we set, the edge corresponding to the inter-layer mutual information is deleted. We extract average weighted degree and average weighted clustering coefficient of reconstructed networks for recognizing the 12-lead ECG signals of healthy subjects and myocardial infarction patients. Moreover, multiscale weighted distribution entropy is also introduced to analyze the relation between the length of original time series and final recognition result. Owing to higher average weighted degree and average weighted clustering coefficient of healthy subjects, their reconstructed networks show a more regular structure, higher complexity and connectivity, and the healthy subjects can be distinguished from patients with myocardial infarction, whose reconstructed networks are sparser. Experimental results show that the identification accuracy of both parameters, average weighted degree and average weighted clustering coefficient, reaches 93.3%, which can distinguish between the 12-lead electrocardiograph signals of healthy people and patients with myocardial infarction, and realize the automatic detection of myocardial infarction.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
2.
School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
3.
School of Intoramtion and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
4.
Suzhou Vocational and Technical College, Suzhou 234000, China
5.
School of Geographic and Biologic Information, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China

Corresponding author: Yang Xiao-Dong, yxdnju@163.com

Funds: Project supported by the Key Research & Development Plan (social development) of Xuzhou, China (Grant No. KC21304) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61772532, 61876186).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Zhang J, Small M 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 238701 Google Scholar
[2]	Zou Y, Donner R V, Marwan N, Donges J F, Kurths J 2019 Phys. Rep. 787 1 Google Scholar
[3]	Lacasa L, Luque B, Ballesteros F, Luque J, Nuno J C 2008 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105 4972 Google Scholar
[4]	Luque B, Lacasa L, Ballesteros F, Luque J 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 046103 Google Scholar
[5]	Donner R V, Zou Y, Donges J F, Marwan N, Kurths J 2010 New J. Phys. 12 033025 Google Scholar
[6]	Marwan N, Donges J F, Zou Y, Donner R V, Kurths J 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 4246 Google Scholar
[7]	Xu X, Zhang J, Small M 2008 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105 19601 Google Scholar
[8]	Donges J F, Donner R V, Trauth M H, Marwan N, Schellnhuber H J 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108 20422 Google Scholar
[9]	周婷婷, 金宁德, 高忠科, 罗跃斌 2012 物理学报 61 030506 Google Scholar Zhou T T, Jin N D, Gao Z K, Luo Y B 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 030506 Google Scholar
[10]	Sun X R, Small M, Zhao Y, Xue X P 2013 Chaos 24 1054 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhang J Y, Zhou J, Tang M, Guo H, Small M, Zou Y 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 7795 Google Scholar
[12]	Kulp C W, Chobot J M, Freitas H R, Sprechini G D 2016 Chaos 26 073114 Google Scholar
[13]	Zou Y, Small M, Liu Z, Kurths J 2014 New J. Phys. 16 013051 Google Scholar
[14]	Donner R V, Donges J F 2012 Acta Geophys. 60 589 Google Scholar
[15]	Bajestani G S, Behrooz M, Khani A G, Nouri-Baygi M, Mollaei A 2019 Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 177 277 Google Scholar
[16]	Tang X Y, Xia L, Liao Y Z, Liu W F, Peng Y H, Gao T X, Zeng Y J 2013 Clin. EEG Neurosci. 44 150 Google Scholar
[17]	Supriya S, Siuly S, Wang H, Cao J L, Zhang Y C 2016 IEEE Access 4 6554 Google Scholar
[18]	Bhaduri S, Ghosh D 2015 Clin. EEG Neurosci. 46 218 Google Scholar
[19]	Wang L, Long X, Arends J B, Aarts R M 2017 J. Neurosci. Method 290 85 Google Scholar
[20]	Kong T J, Shao J, Hu J Y, Yang X, Yang S Y, Malekian R 2021 Sensors 21 1870 Google Scholar
[21]	易娜 2014 硕士学位论文 (广州: 暨南大学) Yi N 2014 M. S. Thesis (Guangzhou: Jinan University) (in Chinese)
[22]	Shi W B, Shang P J, Wang J, Lin A J 2014 Physica A 403 35
[23]	Jiang W, Wei B Y, Zhan J, Xie C H, Zhou D Y 2016 Comput. Ind. Eng. 101 260 Google Scholar
[24]	Azami H, Escudero J 2017 Physica A 465 261 Google Scholar
[25]	Han Y F, Jin N D, Zhai L S, Ren Y Y, He Y S 2019 Physica A 518 131 Google Scholar
[26]	Gao Z K, Liu M X, Dang W D, Ma C, Hou L H, Hong X L 2021 Chem. Eng. J. 407 127229 Google Scholar
[27]	Tanizawa T, Nakamura T, Taya F, Small M 2018 Physica A 512 437 Google Scholar
[28]	Gao Z K, Fang P C, Ding M S, Jin N D 2015 Exp. Therm Fluid Sci. 60 157 Google Scholar
[29]	Bianconi G 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 062806 Google Scholar
[30]	Nicosia V, Bianconi G, Latora V, Barthelemy M 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 058701 Google Scholar
[31]	Battiston F, Nicosia V, Latora V 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 032804 Google Scholar
[32]	Quesada D, Valverde G, Larrañaga P, Bielza C 2021 Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 103 104301 Google Scholar
[33]	Lacasa L, Nicosia V, Latora V 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 15508 Google Scholar
[34]	Carmona-Cabezas R, Gómez-Gómez J, Ariza-Villaverde A B, de Ravé E G, Jiménez-Hornero F J 2020 Atmos. Pollut. Res. 11 205 Google Scholar
[35]	Gao Z K, Guo W, Cai Q, Ma C, Zhang Y B, Kurths J 2019 Chaos 29 073119 Google Scholar
[36]	Cai Q, An J, Gao Z 2021 Brain Sci. Adv. 6 355 Google Scholar
[37]	Samanta K, Chatterjee S, Bose R 2020 IEEE Sensors Lett. 4 1 Google Scholar
[38]	Thygesen K, Alpert J S, White H D 2007 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50 2173 Google Scholar
[39]	Dohare A K, Kumar V, Kumar R 2018 Appl. Soft Comput. 64 138 Google Scholar
[40]	Sharma M, San Tan R, Acharya U R 2018 Comput. Biol. Med. 102 341 Google Scholar
[41]	Tripathy R K, Bhattacharyya A, Pachori R B 2019 IEEE Sensors J. 19 11437 Google Scholar
[42]	Acharya U R, Fujita H, Oh S L, Hagiwara Y, Tan J H, Adam M 2017 Inf. Sci. 415 190 Google Scholar
[43]	熊鹏, 薛彦平, 刘明, 杜海曼, 王洪瑞, 刘秀玲 2020 生物医学工程学杂志 37 142 Google Scholar Xiong P, Xue Y P, Liu M, Du H M, Wang H R, Liu X L 2020 J. Biomed. Eng. 37 142 Google Scholar
[44]	Liu W H, Huang Q J, Chang S, Wang H, He J 2018 Biomed. Signal Process. Control 45 22 Google Scholar
[45]	张汉勇, 孟庆芳, 杜蕾, 刘明敏 2019 中国生物医学工程学报 38 273 Google Scholar Zhang H Y, Meng Q F, Du L, Liu M M 2019 Chin. J. Biomed. Eng. 38 273 Google Scholar
[46]	Goldberger A L, Amaral L, Glass L, Hausdorff J M, Ivanov P C, Mark R G, Mietus J E, Moody G B, Peng C K, Stanley H E 2000 Circulation 101 e215 Google Scholar
[47]	Costa M, Goldberger A L, Peng C K 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 068102 Google Scholar
[48]	Chang P C, Lin J J, Hsieh J C, Weng J 2012 Appl. Soft Comput. 12 3165 Google Scholar
[49]	Sun L, Lu Y P, Yang K T, Li S Z 2012 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59 3348 Google Scholar
[50]	王丹俐 2020 硕士学位论文 (杭州: 杭州电子科技大学) Wang D L 2020 M. S. Thesis (Hangzhou: Hangzhou Danzi University) (in Chinese)

Cited By

图 1 VG算法构造多路可视图示意图　(a)一个多维时间序列; (b) VG算法示意图, 从上至下依次为原始时间序列、红色圆圈包含片段的VG算法过程及其构造后的网络; (c)图(a)虚线框所含序列通过VG算法构造的多路可视图, 其中层1, 2, 3分别对应时间序列x₁, x₂, x₃

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of constructing multiplex visibility graph using VG algorithm: (a) a multivariate time series; (b) schematic diagram of VG algorithm. From top to bottom are original time series, VG algorithm procedure for fragment contained in the red circle and the constructed network; (c) multiplex visibility graph of series in dotted box in figure (a) constructed by VG algorithm, where layers 1, 2 and 3 correspond to time series x₁, x₂ and x₃, respectively.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 多路可视图映射后的网络. 节点1, 2, 3对应多路可视图的第1层、第2层和第3层. I_1,2, I_1,3, I_2,3分别为层1和层2、层1和层3、层2和层3之间的互信息, 同时为对应两点连边的权重

Figure 2. Network mapped by multiplex visibility graph. Nodes 1, 2 and 3 correspond to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd layers of multiplex visibility graph. I_1,2, I_1,3, I_2,3 are the mutual information between layer 1 and layer 2, layer 1 and layer 3, layer 2 and layer 3 respectively, meanwhile, they are the weight of edges of corresponding two points.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 不同年龄的健康人和MI患者在不同尺度因子s下平均权重度分布熵　(a) 60—69岁; (b) 50—59岁; (c) 40—49岁; (d) 30—39岁. 绿色实线为两类人群平均权重度分布熵按比例缩放后的差值, 星号表示差值最大处

Figure 3. Average weighted distribution entropy of healthy people and patients with MI under different scale factor s: (a) 60–69 years old; (b) 50–59 years old; (c) 40–49 years old; (d) 30–39 years old. The solid green line is the difference of average weighted distribution entropy of two groups after scaling, and asterisk represents the maximum difference.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 不同年龄组健康受试者与MI患者在常数c不同取值时的平均权重度　(a) 60—69岁; (b) 50—59岁; (c) 40—49岁; (d) 30—39岁. 绿色实线为两类人群平均权重度的差值, 星号表示差值最大处, 其值见表2

Figure 4. Average weighted degree of healthy subjects and myocardial infarction patients at different values of constant c: (a) 60–69 years old; (b) 50–59 years old; (c) 40–49 years old; (d) 30–39 years old. The solid green line is the difference of the average weighted degree of two groups, and the asterisk represents the maximum difference, see Table 2 for specific values.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 常数c = 0.43时重构网络的拓扑图　(a)健康受试者; (b) MI患者. 各节点对应的导联已在图中标明. 节点大小和颜色对应该节点的权重度. 图右侧颜色柱表示节点权重度

Figure 5. Topology of the reconstructed network of (a) healthy subjects and (b) patients with MI at c = 0.43. The corresponding leads of each node have been indicated in the figure. Size and color are relative to the weighted degree of the node. The color bar on the right of the figure indicates the value of weighted degree.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 健康人和MI患者在最佳阈值下的(a)平均权重度和(b)平均加权聚类系数. 第1组—第4组受试者的年龄范围分别为60—69岁、50—59岁、40—49岁以及30—39岁

Figure 6. (a) Average weighted degree and (b) average weighted clustering coefficients of healthy and myocardial infarction patients under optimal thresholds. Subjects in groups 1–4 correspond to ages of 60–69 years old, 50–59 years old, 40–49 years old and 30 to 39 years old respectively.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 12导联名称及其对应的心脏位置

Table 1. Name of the 12-lead and their corresponding cardiac location

导联名称	心脏部位
I, avl	心脏左室前侧壁
Ⅱ, Ⅲ, avf	心脏后壁、下面
avr	心室内腔
v1, v2	右室
v3, v4	室间隔
v5, v6	左室

DownLoad: CSV

表 2 4组健康人-MI患者对应重构网络的平均权重度差值最大时的常数c

Table 2. Constant c of four groups when difference of average weighted degree of reconstructed network being maximum.

变量	60—69岁	50—59岁	40—49岁	30—39岁
倍数c	0.67	0.67	0.59	0.43
差值	2.2895	1.8389	2.3592	1.9015

DownLoad: CSV

表 3 本方法与其他现有方法的比较

Table 3. The comparison between proposed method and other existing methods

分类方法	特征个数	结果
分类方法	特征个数	敏感性/%	特异性/%	准确率/%
HMM+GMM^[48]	4	85.71	79.82	82.50
KNN+集成学习^[49]	2	92.3	88.1	NA
随机森林^[50]	10	NA	NA	87
AdaBoostM1^[50]	10	NA	NA	90
平均权重度(本文算法)	1	94.4	88.24	93.3
平均加权聚类系数 (本文算法)	1	95.83	82.35	93.3

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Zhang J, Small M 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 238701 Google Scholar
[2]	Zou Y, Donner R V, Marwan N, Donges J F, Kurths J 2019 Phys. Rep. 787 1 Google Scholar
[3]	Lacasa L, Luque B, Ballesteros F, Luque J, Nuno J C 2008 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105 4972 Google Scholar
[4]	Luque B, Lacasa L, Ballesteros F, Luque J 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 046103 Google Scholar
[5]	Donner R V, Zou Y, Donges J F, Marwan N, Kurths J 2010 New J. Phys. 12 033025 Google Scholar
[6]	Marwan N, Donges J F, Zou Y, Donner R V, Kurths J 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 4246 Google Scholar
[7]	Xu X, Zhang J, Small M 2008 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105 19601 Google Scholar
[8]	Donges J F, Donner R V, Trauth M H, Marwan N, Schellnhuber H J 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108 20422 Google Scholar
[9]	周婷婷, 金宁德, 高忠科, 罗跃斌 2012 物理学报 61 030506 Google Scholar Zhou T T, Jin N D, Gao Z K, Luo Y B 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 030506 Google Scholar
[10]	Sun X R, Small M, Zhao Y, Xue X P 2013 Chaos 24 1054 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhang J Y, Zhou J, Tang M, Guo H, Small M, Zou Y 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 7795 Google Scholar
[12]	Kulp C W, Chobot J M, Freitas H R, Sprechini G D 2016 Chaos 26 073114 Google Scholar
[13]	Zou Y, Small M, Liu Z, Kurths J 2014 New J. Phys. 16 013051 Google Scholar
[14]	Donner R V, Donges J F 2012 Acta Geophys. 60 589 Google Scholar
[15]	Bajestani G S, Behrooz M, Khani A G, Nouri-Baygi M, Mollaei A 2019 Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 177 277 Google Scholar
[16]	Tang X Y, Xia L, Liao Y Z, Liu W F, Peng Y H, Gao T X, Zeng Y J 2013 Clin. EEG Neurosci. 44 150 Google Scholar
[17]	Supriya S, Siuly S, Wang H, Cao J L, Zhang Y C 2016 IEEE Access 4 6554 Google Scholar
[18]	Bhaduri S, Ghosh D 2015 Clin. EEG Neurosci. 46 218 Google Scholar
[19]	Wang L, Long X, Arends J B, Aarts R M 2017 J. Neurosci. Method 290 85 Google Scholar
[20]	Kong T J, Shao J, Hu J Y, Yang X, Yang S Y, Malekian R 2021 Sensors 21 1870 Google Scholar
[21]	易娜 2014 硕士学位论文 (广州: 暨南大学) Yi N 2014 M. S. Thesis (Guangzhou: Jinan University) (in Chinese)
[22]	Shi W B, Shang P J, Wang J, Lin A J 2014 Physica A 403 35
[23]	Jiang W, Wei B Y, Zhan J, Xie C H, Zhou D Y 2016 Comput. Ind. Eng. 101 260 Google Scholar
[24]	Azami H, Escudero J 2017 Physica A 465 261 Google Scholar
[25]	Han Y F, Jin N D, Zhai L S, Ren Y Y, He Y S 2019 Physica A 518 131 Google Scholar
[26]	Gao Z K, Liu M X, Dang W D, Ma C, Hou L H, Hong X L 2021 Chem. Eng. J. 407 127229 Google Scholar
[27]	Tanizawa T, Nakamura T, Taya F, Small M 2018 Physica A 512 437 Google Scholar
[28]	Gao Z K, Fang P C, Ding M S, Jin N D 2015 Exp. Therm Fluid Sci. 60 157 Google Scholar
[29]	Bianconi G 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 062806 Google Scholar
[30]	Nicosia V, Bianconi G, Latora V, Barthelemy M 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 058701 Google Scholar
[31]	Battiston F, Nicosia V, Latora V 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 032804 Google Scholar
[32]	Quesada D, Valverde G, Larrañaga P, Bielza C 2021 Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 103 104301 Google Scholar
[33]	Lacasa L, Nicosia V, Latora V 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 15508 Google Scholar
[34]	Carmona-Cabezas R, Gómez-Gómez J, Ariza-Villaverde A B, de Ravé E G, Jiménez-Hornero F J 2020 Atmos. Pollut. Res. 11 205 Google Scholar
[35]	Gao Z K, Guo W, Cai Q, Ma C, Zhang Y B, Kurths J 2019 Chaos 29 073119 Google Scholar
[36]	Cai Q, An J, Gao Z 2021 Brain Sci. Adv. 6 355 Google Scholar
[37]	Samanta K, Chatterjee S, Bose R 2020 IEEE Sensors Lett. 4 1 Google Scholar
[38]	Thygesen K, Alpert J S, White H D 2007 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50 2173 Google Scholar
[39]	Dohare A K, Kumar V, Kumar R 2018 Appl. Soft Comput. 64 138 Google Scholar
[40]	Sharma M, San Tan R, Acharya U R 2018 Comput. Biol. Med. 102 341 Google Scholar
[41]	Tripathy R K, Bhattacharyya A, Pachori R B 2019 IEEE Sensors J. 19 11437 Google Scholar
[42]	Acharya U R, Fujita H, Oh S L, Hagiwara Y, Tan J H, Adam M 2017 Inf. Sci. 415 190 Google Scholar
[43]	熊鹏, 薛彦平, 刘明, 杜海曼, 王洪瑞, 刘秀玲 2020 生物医学工程学杂志 37 142 Google Scholar Xiong P, Xue Y P, Liu M, Du H M, Wang H R, Liu X L 2020 J. Biomed. Eng. 37 142 Google Scholar
[44]	Liu W H, Huang Q J, Chang S, Wang H, He J 2018 Biomed. Signal Process. Control 45 22 Google Scholar
[45]	张汉勇, 孟庆芳, 杜蕾, 刘明敏 2019 中国生物医学工程学报 38 273 Google Scholar Zhang H Y, Meng Q F, Du L, Liu M M 2019 Chin. J. Biomed. Eng. 38 273 Google Scholar
[46]	Goldberger A L, Amaral L, Glass L, Hausdorff J M, Ivanov P C, Mark R G, Mietus J E, Moody G B, Peng C K, Stanley H E 2000 Circulation 101 e215 Google Scholar
[47]	Costa M, Goldberger A L, Peng C K 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 068102 Google Scholar
[48]	Chang P C, Lin J J, Hsieh J C, Weng J 2012 Appl. Soft Comput. 12 3165 Google Scholar
[49]	Sun L, Lu Y P, Yang K T, Li S Z 2012 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59 3348 Google Scholar
[50]	王丹俐 2020 硕士学位论文 (杭州: 杭州电子科技大学) Wang D L 2020 M. S. Thesis (Hangzhou: Hangzhou Danzi University) (in Chinese)

[1]	Ma Jin-Long, Zhang Jun-Feng, Zhang Dong-Wen, Zhang Hong-Bin. Quantifying complex network traffic capacity based on communicability sequence entropy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(7): 078902. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201300
[2]	. ECG signals’complex network recognition for health and Myocardial Infarction based on multiplex visibility graph. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211656
[3]	Wang Li-Na, Cheng Yuan-Yuan, Zang Chen-Rui. A symbolized time series network based on seasonal-trend-loess method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(23): 238901. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190794
[4]	Chen Dan, Shi Dan-Dan, Pan Gui-Jun. Correlation between the electrical transport performance and the communicability sequence entropy in complex networks. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(11): 118901. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190230
[5]	Xing Xue, Yu De-Xin, Tian Xiu-Juan, Wang Shi-Guang. Analysis of multi-state traffic flow time series properties using visibility graph. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(23): 230501. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.230501
[6]	Wu Xi-Ping, Yang Hong-Yu, Han Song-Chen. Analysis on network properties of multivariate mixed air traffic management technical support system based on complex network theory. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(14): 140203. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.140203
[7]	Li Yu-Shan, Lü Ling, Liu Ye, Liu Shuo, Yan Bing-Bing, Chang Huan, Zhou Jia-Nan. Spatiotemporal chaos synchronization of complex networks by Backstepping design. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(2): 020513. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.020513
[8]	Gao Zhong-Ke, Hu Li-Dan, Zhou Ting-Ting, Jin Ning-De. Limited penetrable visibility graph from two-phase flow for investigating flow pattern dynamics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(11): 110507. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.110507
[9]	Xing Chang-Ming, Liu Fang-Ai, Xu Ru-Zhi. Exact solution for mean trapping time of random walk on a scale-free Koch network. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(20): 200503. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.200503
[10]	Gao Xiang-Yun, An Hai-Zhong, Fang Wei. Research on fluctuation of bivariate correlation of time series based on complex networks theory. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(9): 098902. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.098902
[11]	Gao Zhong-Ke, Jin Ning-De, Yang Dan, Zhai Lu-Sheng, Du Meng. Complex networks from multivariate time series for characterizing nonlinear dynamics of two-phase flow patterns. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(12): 120510. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.120510
[12]	Zhou Ting-Ting, Jin Ning-De, Gao Zhong-Ke, Luo Yue-Bin. Limited penetrable visibility graph for establishing complex network from time series. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(3): 030506. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.030506
[13]	Cui Ai-Xiang, Fu Yan, Shang Ming-Sheng, Chen Duan-Bing, Zhou Tao. Emergence of local structures in complex network:common neighborhood drives the network evolution. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(3): 038901. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.038901
[14]	Chen Hua-Liang, Liu Zhong-Xin, Chen Zeng-Qiang, Yuan Zhu-Zhi. Research on one weighted routing strategy for complex networks. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(9): 6068-6073. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6068
[15]	Li Tao, Pei Wen-Jiang, Wang Shao-Ping. Optimal traffic routing strategy on scale-free complex networks. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(9): 5903-5910. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5903
[16]	Wang Dan, Yu Hao, Jing Yuan-Wei, Jiang Nan, Zhang Si-Ying. Study on the congestion in complex network based on traffic awareness algorithm. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(10): 6802-6808. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6802
[17]	Lü Ling, Zhang Chao. Chaos synchronization of a complex network with different nodes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(3): 1462-1466. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.1462
[18]	Song Qing-Song, Feng Zu-Ren, Li Ren-Hou. Multiple clusters echo state network for chaotic time series prediction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(7): 5057-5064. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5057
[19]	Xu Dan, Li Xiang, Wang Xiao-Fan. An investigation on local area control of virus spreading in complex networks. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(3): 1313-1317. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1313
[20]	Li Ji, Wang Bing-Hong, Jiang Pin-Qun, Zhou Tao, Wang Wen-Xu. Growing complex network model with acceleratingly increasing number of nodes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(8): 4051-4057. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4051

Catalog

Vol. 71, Issue 5 - 2022-03-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 5388
PDF Downloads: 122
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板