-
Volume viscosity is one of the most important and fundamental parameters in hydrodynamics. It measures the momentum loss caused by a volume deformation rather than shape deformation. So it is closely related to numerous phenomena in fluid dynamics. However, most of the existing related researches focus on the bulk fluids, but there is still a lack of in-depth understanding of the bulk viscosity of inhomogeneous fluids. In this work, a novel theoretical method is proposed for the inhomogeneous volume viscosity in the framework of Maxwell viscoelastic theory. In this proposal, the local relaxation time is calculated by using the viscous and elastic properties of the bulk fluids. Accordingly, the inhomogeneous volume viscosity can be obtained by combining the calculations of the local relaxation time and the local relaxation modulus. It is advantageous in the theoretical sense over the conventional LADM, because it takes into account the underlying correlation much better. On the one hand, the local infinite-frequency modulus is more accurate. On the other hand, by using an appropriate weight function to calculate the weight, the correlation effect can be better considered . As an application, the volume viscosity of the confined Lennard-Jones fluid in slit pore is investigated, and the influences of bulk density, temperature, pore width and adsorption strength are calculated and analyzed. The results indicate that these factors can significantly modulate the volume viscosity of the confined fluid. Specifically, the positive correlation between the volume viscosity and the local density leads to the oscillation of viscosity profile in the pore. Besides, the occurrence of capillary condensation in the cases of lower density and lower temperature makes the inhomogeneous viscosity rather different from that of bulk gaseous phase. Further, this study shows that the inhomogeneous volume viscosity usually increases with temperature decreasing, or with adsorption strength increasing. This is again the result of its dependence on the fluid structure in the pore. Furthermore, the influence of pore width on the inhomogeneous volume viscosity indicates that the excluded volume plays a decisive role. This can be attributed to the fact that it exerts a direct influence on the deformation of the fluid. Moreover, comparison between the volume and shear viscosity is also conducted and analyzed. In general, this study can be beneficial to deepening the understanding of volume viscosity in the confined fluids, and can provide reliable theoretical support for studying related issues in hydrodynamics.
-
Keywords:
- inhomogeneous fluid /
- volume viscosity /
- local relaxation time /
- mechanical modulus
[1] Stephan K, Lucas K D 1979 Viscosities of Dense Fluids (New York: Plenum
[2] Richardson S M 1989 Fluid Mechanics (New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation
[3] Dhont J K G 1996 An Introduction to Dynamics of Colloids (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science
[4] Cerbelaud M, Laganapan A M, Ala-Nissila T, Ferrandod R, Videcoq A 2017 Soft Matter 13 3909
Google Scholar
[5] Zabaloy M S, Machado J M V, Macedo E A 2001 Int. J. Thermophys. 22 829
Google Scholar
[6] Duque-Zumajo D, de la Torre J A, Español P 2020 J. Chem. Phys. 152 174108
Google Scholar
[7] Zhang J F, Todd B D, Travis K P 2004 J. Chem. Phys. 121 10778
Google Scholar
[8] 钱祖文 2012 物理学报 61 134301
Google Scholar
Qian Z W 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 134301
Google Scholar
[9] Stokes G G 1845 Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 8 287
[10] Bhola S, Sengupta T K 2019 Phys. Fluids 31 096101
Google Scholar
[11] Rahimzadeh A, Rutsch M, Kupnik M, Klitzing R 2021 Langmuir 37 5854
Google Scholar
[12] Chen S, Wang X N, Wang J C, Wan M P, Li H, Chen S Y 2019 Phys. Fluids 31 085115
Google Scholar
[13] Bhatia A B 1967 Ultrasonic Absorption: An Introduction to the Theory of Sound Absorption and Dispersion in Gases, Liquids, and Solids (New York: Oxford University Press
[14] Emanuel G 1990 Phys. Fluids A 2 2252
Google Scholar
[15] Meier K, Laesecke A, Kabelac S 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 122 014513
Google Scholar
[16] Zhang Y, Otani A, Maginn E J 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 3537
Google Scholar
[17] Sharma B, Kumar R, Gupta P, Pareek S, Singh A 2022 Phys. Fluids 34 057104
Google Scholar
[18] Heyes D M, Pieprzyk S, Brańka A C 2022 J. Chem. Phys. 157 114502
Google Scholar
[19] Hoover W G, Ladd A J C, Hickman R B, Holian B L 1980 Phys. Rev. A 21 1756
Google Scholar
[20] Sharma B, Kumar R 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 013309
Google Scholar
[21] Palla P L, Pierleoni C, Ciccotti G 2008 Phys. Rev. E 78 021204
Google Scholar
[22] Rah K, Eu B C 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 4566
Google Scholar
[23] Okumura H, Yonezawa F 2002 J. Chem. Phys. 116 7400
Google Scholar
[24] Gelb L D, Gubbins K E, Radhakrishnan R, Sliwinska-Bartkowiak M 1999 Rep. Prog. Phys. 62 1573
Google Scholar
[25] Yu Y X, Gao G H, Wang X L 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B 110 14418
Google Scholar
[26] Zhao S L, Liu Y, Chen X Q, Lu Y X, Liu H L, Hu Y 2015 Adv. Chem. Eng. 47 1
Google Scholar
[27] Mittal J, Truskett T M, Errington J R, Hummer G 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 145901
Google Scholar
[28] Banks H T, Hu S H, Kenz Z R 2011 Adv. Appl. Math. Mech. 3 1
Google Scholar
[29] Bitsanis I, Vanderlick T K, Tirrell M, Davis H T 1988 J. Chem. Phys. 89 3152
Google Scholar
[30] Hoang H, Galliero G 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 021202
Google Scholar
[31] Hoang H, Galliero G 2013 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25 485001
Google Scholar
[32] Heyes D M 1984 J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. II 80 1363
Google Scholar
[33] Zwanzig R, Mountain R D 1965 J. Chem. Phys. 43 4464
Google Scholar
[34] Sun Z L, Kang Y S, Kang Y M 2019 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58 15637
Google Scholar
[35] Johnson J K, Zollweg J A, Gubbins K E 1993 Mol. Phys. 78 591
Google Scholar
[36] Yu Y X, Wu J Z 2002 J. Chem. Phys. 117 10156
Google Scholar
[37] Liu Y, Liu H L, Hu Y, Jiang J W 2010 J. Phys. Chem. B 114 2820
Google Scholar
[38] Sun Z L, Kang Y S, Li S T 2022 J. Phys. Chem. B 126 8010
Google Scholar
[39] Sun Z L, Kang Y S, Li S T 2023 Chem. Eng. Sci. 277 118847
Google Scholar
[40] Goyal I, Zaheri A H M, Srivastava S, Tankeshwar K 2013 Phys. Chem. Liq. 55 595
Google Scholar
[41] Jaeger F, Matar O K, Müller E A 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 148 174504
Google Scholar
[42] Cowan J A, Leech J W 1981 Can. J. Phys. 59 1280
[43] Paeßens M 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 118 10287
Google Scholar
-
图 1 Maxwell黏弹模型示意图 (a) 弹簧单元; (b) 活塞单元; (c) 标准线性固体模型
Figure 1. A sketch of the Maxwell viscoelastic model: (a) Spring unit; (b) piston unit; (c) standard linear solid model.
图 2 狭缝中LJ流体的局域弛豫模量的分布. 图中实线为$ {K}_{2}\left(z\right) $的结果, 虚线为$ {K}_{\infty }^{{\mathrm{b}}}\left(\bar{\rho }\left(z\right)\right)-{K}_{0}^{{\mathrm{b}}}\left(\bar{\rho }\left(z\right)\right) $的结果. 计算中的参数取为$ {T}^{*}=1.5 $, $ {H}^{*}=6.0 $. 此外, 约化模量$ {K}_{2}^{*}={K}_{2}{\sigma }^{3}/\varepsilon $
Figure 2. Profiles of the local relaxation modulus of LJ fluid in slits. In the figure, the solid and dashed lines stand for the results of $ {K}_{2}\left(z\right) $ and $ {K}_{\infty }^{{\mathrm{b}}}\left(\bar{\rho }\left(z\right)\right)-{K}_{0}^{{\mathrm{b}}}\left(\bar{\rho }\left(z\right)\right) $, respectively. In the calculations, the parameters are set as $ {T}^{*}=1.5 $, $ {H}^{*}=6.0 $. In addition, the modulus is reduced as $ {K}_{2}^{*}={K}_{2}{\sigma }^{3}/\varepsilon $.
图 3 狭缝中LJ流体的剪切黏度分布. 计算中的流体参数取为$ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}=0.291 $, $ {T}^{*}=2.0 $
Figure 3. Profiles of shear viscosity of LJ fluid in slits. In the calculations, the fluid parameters are set as $ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}=0.291 $ and $ {T}^{*}=2.0 $.
图 4 狭缝中LJ流体的平均体积黏度随缝宽$ {H}^{*} $的变化. 其中, 实线、虚线和点分别为本文结果、LADM结果和基于GK的解析结果
Figure 4. Dependence of the averaged volume viscosity of LJ fluid on the pore width $ H $. In each figure, the solid lines, dashed lines and symbols stand for the results from this work, LADM and GK-based method, respectively.
图 5 在$ {H}^{*}=6.0 $情况下, 体积黏度$ {\eta }_{{\mathrm{v}}}^{*}\left({z}^{*}\right) $随体密度的变化 (a) $ {T}^{*}=2.0 $; (b) $ {T}^{*}=1.0 $
Figure 5. Influence of bulk density on the volume viscosity $ {\eta }_{{\mathrm{v}}}^{*}\left({z}^{*}\right) $ under the condition of $ {H}^{*}=6.0 $: (a) $ {T}^{*}=2.0; $ (b) $ {T}^{*}=1.0 $.
图 6 在$ {H}^{*}=6.0 $情况下, 受限流体中比值$ {R}_{\eta }^{{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{o}}{\mathrm{r}}{\mathrm{e}}} $随体密度的变化
Figure 6. Influence of bulk density on the ratio $ {R}_{\eta }^{{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{o}}{\mathrm{r}}{\mathrm{e}}} $ of the confined fluids, under the condition of $ {H}^{*}=6.0 $.
图 7 在$ {H}^{*}=6.0 $情况下, 体积黏度$ {\eta }_{{\mathrm{v}}}^{*}\left({z}^{*}\right) $随温度的变化 (a) $ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}=0.01; $ (b) $ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}=0.6 $.
Figure 7. Influence of temperature on the volume viscosity $ {\eta }_{{\mathrm{v}}}^{*}\left({z}^{*}\right) $ under the condition of $ {H}^{*}=6.0: $ (a) $ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}=0.01 $; (b) $ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}=0.6 $.
图 8 在$ {H}^{*}=6.0 $情况下, 受限流体中比值$ {R}_{\eta }^{{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{o}}{\mathrm{r}}{\mathrm{e}}} $随温度的变化
Figure 8. Influence of temperature on the ratio $ {R}_{\eta }^{{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{o}}{\mathrm{r}}{\mathrm{e}}} $ of the confined fluids, under the condition of $ {H}^{*}=6.0 $.
图 9 在$ {T}^{*}=1.5 $和$ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}=0.8 $条件下, (a) 体积黏度$ {\eta }_{{\mathrm{v}}}^{*}\left({z}^{*}\right) $随缝宽的变化; (b) 比值$ {R}_{\eta }^{{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{o}}{\mathrm{r}}{\mathrm{e}}} $随缝宽的变化. 图(b)中虚线为同一条件下体相液态的实验结果[40]
Figure 9. Influence of pore width on (a) the volume viscosity $ {\eta }_{{\mathrm{v}}}^{*}\left({z}^{*}\right) $ and (b) the ratio $ {R}_{\eta }^{{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{o}}{\mathrm{r}}{\mathrm{e}}} $, under the conditions of $ {T}^{*}=1.5 $ and $ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}=0.8 $. The dashed line in panel (b) denotes the experimental result[40] under the same conditions.
图 10 在$ {H}^{*}=6.0 $情况下, 体积黏度$ {\eta }_{{\mathrm{v}}}^{*}\left({z}^{*}\right) $随吸附势强度的变化 (a) $ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}=0.1 $; (b) $ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}=0.6 $
Figure 10. Influence of adsorption strength on the volume viscosity $ {\eta }_{{\mathrm{v}}}^{*}\left({z}^{*}\right) $ under the condition of $ {H}^{*}=6.0 $: (a) $ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}= $$ 0.1 $; (b) $ {\rho }_{{\mathrm{b}}}^{*}=0.6 $.
图 11 在$ {H}^{*}=6.0 $情况下, 受限流体中比值$ {R}_{\eta }^{{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{o}}{\mathrm{r}}{\mathrm{e}}} $随吸附势强度的变化
Figure 11. Influence of adsorption strength on the ratio $ {R}_{\eta }^{{\mathrm{p}}{\mathrm{o}}{\mathrm{r}}{\mathrm{e}}} $ of the confined fluids, under the condition of $ {H}^{*}=6.0 $.
-
[1] Stephan K, Lucas K D 1979 Viscosities of Dense Fluids (New York: Plenum
[2] Richardson S M 1989 Fluid Mechanics (New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation
[3] Dhont J K G 1996 An Introduction to Dynamics of Colloids (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science
[4] Cerbelaud M, Laganapan A M, Ala-Nissila T, Ferrandod R, Videcoq A 2017 Soft Matter 13 3909
Google Scholar
[5] Zabaloy M S, Machado J M V, Macedo E A 2001 Int. J. Thermophys. 22 829
Google Scholar
[6] Duque-Zumajo D, de la Torre J A, Español P 2020 J. Chem. Phys. 152 174108
Google Scholar
[7] Zhang J F, Todd B D, Travis K P 2004 J. Chem. Phys. 121 10778
Google Scholar
[8] 钱祖文 2012 物理学报 61 134301
Google Scholar
Qian Z W 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 134301
Google Scholar
[9] Stokes G G 1845 Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 8 287
[10] Bhola S, Sengupta T K 2019 Phys. Fluids 31 096101
Google Scholar
[11] Rahimzadeh A, Rutsch M, Kupnik M, Klitzing R 2021 Langmuir 37 5854
Google Scholar
[12] Chen S, Wang X N, Wang J C, Wan M P, Li H, Chen S Y 2019 Phys. Fluids 31 085115
Google Scholar
[13] Bhatia A B 1967 Ultrasonic Absorption: An Introduction to the Theory of Sound Absorption and Dispersion in Gases, Liquids, and Solids (New York: Oxford University Press
[14] Emanuel G 1990 Phys. Fluids A 2 2252
Google Scholar
[15] Meier K, Laesecke A, Kabelac S 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 122 014513
Google Scholar
[16] Zhang Y, Otani A, Maginn E J 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 3537
Google Scholar
[17] Sharma B, Kumar R, Gupta P, Pareek S, Singh A 2022 Phys. Fluids 34 057104
Google Scholar
[18] Heyes D M, Pieprzyk S, Brańka A C 2022 J. Chem. Phys. 157 114502
Google Scholar
[19] Hoover W G, Ladd A J C, Hickman R B, Holian B L 1980 Phys. Rev. A 21 1756
Google Scholar
[20] Sharma B, Kumar R 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 013309
Google Scholar
[21] Palla P L, Pierleoni C, Ciccotti G 2008 Phys. Rev. E 78 021204
Google Scholar
[22] Rah K, Eu B C 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 4566
Google Scholar
[23] Okumura H, Yonezawa F 2002 J. Chem. Phys. 116 7400
Google Scholar
[24] Gelb L D, Gubbins K E, Radhakrishnan R, Sliwinska-Bartkowiak M 1999 Rep. Prog. Phys. 62 1573
Google Scholar
[25] Yu Y X, Gao G H, Wang X L 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B 110 14418
Google Scholar
[26] Zhao S L, Liu Y, Chen X Q, Lu Y X, Liu H L, Hu Y 2015 Adv. Chem. Eng. 47 1
Google Scholar
[27] Mittal J, Truskett T M, Errington J R, Hummer G 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 145901
Google Scholar
[28] Banks H T, Hu S H, Kenz Z R 2011 Adv. Appl. Math. Mech. 3 1
Google Scholar
[29] Bitsanis I, Vanderlick T K, Tirrell M, Davis H T 1988 J. Chem. Phys. 89 3152
Google Scholar
[30] Hoang H, Galliero G 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 021202
Google Scholar
[31] Hoang H, Galliero G 2013 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25 485001
Google Scholar
[32] Heyes D M 1984 J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. II 80 1363
Google Scholar
[33] Zwanzig R, Mountain R D 1965 J. Chem. Phys. 43 4464
Google Scholar
[34] Sun Z L, Kang Y S, Kang Y M 2019 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58 15637
Google Scholar
[35] Johnson J K, Zollweg J A, Gubbins K E 1993 Mol. Phys. 78 591
Google Scholar
[36] Yu Y X, Wu J Z 2002 J. Chem. Phys. 117 10156
Google Scholar
[37] Liu Y, Liu H L, Hu Y, Jiang J W 2010 J. Phys. Chem. B 114 2820
Google Scholar
[38] Sun Z L, Kang Y S, Li S T 2022 J. Phys. Chem. B 126 8010
Google Scholar
[39] Sun Z L, Kang Y S, Li S T 2023 Chem. Eng. Sci. 277 118847
Google Scholar
[40] Goyal I, Zaheri A H M, Srivastava S, Tankeshwar K 2013 Phys. Chem. Liq. 55 595
Google Scholar
[41] Jaeger F, Matar O K, Müller E A 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 148 174504
Google Scholar
[42] Cowan J A, Leech J W 1981 Can. J. Phys. 59 1280
[43] Paeßens M 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 118 10287
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 1736
- PDF Downloads: 43
- Cited By: 0
