Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Influence of relativistic effects on photoionization process of hydrogen-like ions in plasma environment

Ge Di Zhao Guo-Peng Qi Yue-Ying Chen Chen Gao Jun-Wen Hou Hong-Sheng

Citation:

Influence of relativistic effects on photoionization process of hydrogen-like ions in plasma environment

Ge Di, Zhao Guo-Peng, Qi Yue-Ying, Chen Chen, Gao Jun-Wen, Hou Hong-Sheng
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • In this study, the photoionization cross sections of C5+, Al12+, and W73+ ions in a Debye plasma environment are calculated in the dipole approximation. The main emphasis is placed on investigating the influence of relativistic effects on shape resonances, Cooper minima, and virtual state effects. The relativistic effects lead to fine-structure splittings, allowing the appearance of double-shape resonance peaks in the total cross-section. Because the width and energy position of resonance peak are affected by the near critical screening length, the increase of nuclear charge Z leads to the significant differences in the size, width, and position of the double-shape resonance peak. The energy position of Cooper minimum in the photoelectrons is related to the critical screening length corresponding to the final continuum state. Unlike the deeper minima observed in the total photoionization cross-sections for C5+ and Al12+ ions, for the higher nuclear charge of W73+ ions, the significant fine-structure splitting arising from relativistic effects results in substantial differences in the positions of the Cooper minima in the partial cross-sections. Therefore, when superimposed on the total cross section, these minima appear shallower. The W73+ ion has a higher nuclear charge, and the screening length related to the virtual state effect is completely different from that of C5+ ion and Al12+ ion. Moreover, for the same screening length, there is a significant difference in the virtual state enhancement amplitude between C5+ ion and Al12+ ion in the low energy region .
      Corresponding author: Zhao Guo-Peng, guopengzhao@zjxu.edu.cn ; Qi Yue-Ying, yying_qi@zjxu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12105119) and the Open Foundation for Key Laboratory of Clean Energy and Carbon Neutrality of Zhejiang Province, China (Grant No. 204022023006A).
    [1]

    Qi Y Y, Wang J G, Janev R K 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 063404Google Scholar

    [2]

    Shore B W 1975 J. Phys. B 8 2023Google Scholar

    [3]

    Qi Y Y, Wang J G, Janev R K 2011 Eur. Phys. J. D 63 327Google Scholar

    [4]

    Cooper J W 1962 Phys. Rev. 128 681Google Scholar

    [5]

    Yin R Y, Pratt R H 1987 Phys. Rev. A 35 1149Google Scholar

    [6]

    Combet-Farnoux F 1972 Proceedings of the International Conference on Inner Shell Ionization Phenomena (Vol. 2) (Atlanta: University of Georgia Press) p1130

    [7]

    Lin C Y, Ho Y K 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 033405Google Scholar

    [8]

    Lin C Y, Ho Y K 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 093302Google Scholar

    [9]

    Lin C Y, Ho Y K 2011 Phys. Scr. T 144 014051Google Scholar

    [10]

    Xie L Y, Wang J G, Janev R K 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 063304Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zheng X, Chi H C, Lin S T, Jiang G, Qiao C, Huang K N 2019 Indian J. Phys. 93 267Google Scholar

    [12]

    Shukla P K, Eliasson B 2008 Phys. Lett. A 372 2897Google Scholar

    [13]

    Qi Y Y, Wang J G, Janev R K 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 062110Google Scholar

    [14]

    Das M 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 012709Google Scholar

    [15]

    Chen Z B, Wang K 2020 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 245 106847Google Scholar

    [16]

    Sharma R, Goyal A 2022 Indian J. Phys. 96 1829Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zeng J, Li Y, Gao C, Yuan J 2020 A& A 634 A117Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zeng J, Li Y, Yuan J 2021 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 272 107777Google Scholar

    [19]

    Li X, Rosmej F B 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126478Google Scholar

    [20]

    Dawra D, Dimri M, Singh A K, Jha A K S, Pandey R K, Sharma R, Mohan M 2021 Phys. Plasmas 28 112706Google Scholar

    [21]

    Singh D, Varshni Y P 1983 Phys. Rev. A 28 2606Google Scholar

    [22]

    Stanton L G, Murillo M S 2015 Phys. Rev. E 91 033104Google Scholar

    [23]

    Zhao G P, Xie L Y, Liu L, Wang J G, Janev R K 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 083302Google Scholar

    [24]

    Chen Z B, Qi Y Y, Sun H Y, Zhao G P, Liu P F, Wang K 2020 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 253 107170Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhao G P, Chen C, Liu L, Chen Z B, Qi Y Y, Wang J G 2022 Phys. Plasmas 29 053301Google Scholar

    [26]

    Baimbetov F B, Nurekenov Kh T, Ramazanov T S 1995 Phys. Lett. A 202 211Google Scholar

    [27]

    Das N, Das B, Ghoshal A 2022 Phys. Plasmas 29 073505Google Scholar

    [28]

    Chen Z B 2023 Few-Body Syst. 64 74Google Scholar

    [29]

    Chen Z B, Hu H W, Ma K, Liu X B, Guo X L, Li S, Zhu B H, Huang L, Wang K 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 032108Google Scholar

    [30]

    Xie H H, Jiao L G, Liu A, Ho Y K 2021 Int. J. Quantum Chem.   121 e26653Google Scholar

    [31]

    Wu J Y, Wu Y, Qi Y Y, Wang J G, Janev R K, Zhang S B 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 012705Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wu J Y, Qi Y Y, Cheng Y J, Wu Y, Wang J G, Janev R K, Zhang S B 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 043301Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhao G P, Qi Y Y, Liu L, Wang J G, Janev R K 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 063509Google Scholar

    [34]

    Chen C, Zhao G P, Chen Z B, Qi Y Y, Liu L, Wu Y, Wang J G 2023 Phys. Plasmas 30 123503Google Scholar

    [35]

    Qi Y Y, Ning L N, Wang J G, Qu Y Z 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 123301Google Scholar

    [36]

    Qi Y Y, Ye D D, Wang J G, Qu Y Z 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 033403Google Scholar

    [37]

    Hoarty D J, Allan P, James S F, Brown C R D, Hobbs L M R, Hill M P, Harris J W O, Morton J, Brookes M G, Shepherd R, Dunn J, Chen H, Marley E V, Beiersdorfer P, Chung H K, Lee R W, Brown G, Emig J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 265003Google Scholar

    [38]

    Gormezano C, Sips A C C, Luce T C, Ide S, Becoulet A 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 S285Google Scholar

    [39]

    Dyall K G, Grant I P, Johnson C T, Parpia F A, Plummer E P 1989 Comput. Phys. Commun. 55 425Google Scholar

    [40]

    Grant I P 1974 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 7 1458

    [41]

    Jönsson P, He X, Froese Fischer C, Grant I P 2007 Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 597Google Scholar

    [42]

    Tews M G, Perger W F 2001 Comput. Phys. Commun. 141 205Google Scholar

    [43]

    Perger W F, Halabuka Z, Trautmann D 1993 Comput. Phys. Commun. 76 250Google Scholar

    [44]

    Landau L D, Lifshitz E M 1958 Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory (London: Pergamon

    [45]

    Bilycki M, Stachov A, Karwowski J, Mukherjee P K 2007 Chem. Phys. 331 346Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a) C5+, (b) Al12+ 和 (c) W73+ 离子初态为1s1/2的总标度光电离截面随标度的光电子能量的变化关系, 不同颜色的曲线对应不同的标度屏蔽长度

    Figure 1.  Behavior of the total 1s1/2 scaled photoionization cross sections of (a) C5+, (b) Al12+ and (c) W73+ ion as a function of scaled photoelectron energy. The colors of the lines are for different scaled screening lengths.

    图 2  W73+ 离子初态为1s1/2的跃迁 (a) 1s1/2→εp1/2, (b) 1s1/2→εp3/2贡献的标度的分截面和(c)总光电离截面随标度的光电子能量的变化关系, 不同颜色的曲线对应不同的标度的屏蔽长度

    Figure 2.  Behavior of scaled partial (a) 1s1/2→εp1/2, (b) 1s1/2→εp3/2 and (c) total 1s1/2 photoionization cross sections of W73+ ion as a function of scaled photoelectron energy. The colors of the lines are for different scaled screening lengths.

    图 3  (a) C5+, (b) Al12+ 和 (c) W73+ 离子初态为2s1/2的总标度光电离截面随标度的光电子能量的变化关系, 不同颜色的曲线对应不同的标度的屏蔽长度

    Figure 3.  Behavior of the total 2s1/2 scaled photoionization cross sections of (a) C5+, (b) Al12+ and (c) W73+ ion as a function of scaled photoelectron energy. The colors of the lines are for different scaled screening lengths.

    图 4  (a) C5+, (b) Al12+ 和 (c) W73+ 离子初态为2s1/2的总标度光电离截面随标度的光电子能量的变化关系, 不同颜色的曲线对应不同的标度的屏蔽长度

    Figure 4.  Behavior of the total 2s1/2 scaled photoionization cross sections of (a) C5+, (b) Al12+ and (c) W73+ ion as a function of scaled photoelectron energy. The colors of the lines are for different scaled screening lengths

    图 5  W73+ 离子跃迁 (a) 2s1/2→εp1/2和 (b) 2s1/2→εp3/2贡献的分标度截面随标度的光电子能量的变化关系. 不同颜色的曲线对应不同的标度的屏蔽长度

    Figure 5.  Behavior of partial (a) 2s1/2→εp1/2 and (b) 2s1/2→εp3/2 scaled photoionization cross sections of W73+ ion as a function of scaled photoelectron energy. The colors of the lines are for different scaled screening lengths.

    图 6  (a) C5+, (b) Al12+ 和 (c) W73+ 离子初态为2p1/2的总标度光电离截面随标度的光电子能量的变化关系, 不同颜色的曲线对应不同的标度的屏蔽长度

    Figure 6.  Behavior of the total 2p1/2 scaled photoionization cross sections of (a) C5+, (b) Al12+ and (c) W73+ ion as a function of scaled photoelectron energy. The colors of the lines are for different scaled screening lengths.

    图 7  (a) C5+, (b) Al12+ 和 (c) W73+ 离子初态为2p3/2的总标度光电离截面随标度的光电子能量的变化关系, 不同颜色的曲线对应不同的标度的屏蔽长度

    Figure 7.  Behavior of the total 2p3/2 scaled photoionization cross sections of (a) C5+, (b) Al12+ and (c) W73+ ion as a function of scaled photoelectron energy. The colors of the lines are for different scaled screening lengths.

    图 8  Al12+ 离子跃迁 (a) 2p3/2→εs1/2, (b) 2p3/2→εd3/2和(c) 2p3/2→εd5/2贡献的分标度截面随标度的光电子能量的变化关系. 不同颜色的曲线对应不同的标度的屏蔽长度

    Figure 8.  Behavior of partial (a) 2p3/2→εs1/2, (b) 2p3/2→εd3/2, and (c) 2p3/2→εd5/2 scaled photoionization cross sections of Al12+ ion as a function of scaled photoelectron energy. The colors of the lines are for different scaled screening lengths.

    表 1  C5+, Al12+ 和 W73+离子$ n \leqslant 3 $的临界标度屏蔽长度$ \delta _{nlj}^{\text{c}} $

    Table 1.  Values of critical scaled screening lengths $ \delta _{nlj}^{\text{c}} $ for C5+, Al12+, and W73+ ions for $ n \leqslant 3 $.

    n s1/2 p1/2 p3/2 d3/2 d5/2
    1C5+0.8397
    Al12+0.8389
    W73+0.8035
    2C5+3.22224.53914.5406
    Al12+3.21674.53244.5395
    W73+2.98104.23984.4945
    3C5+7.16818.86908.871410.946410.9472
    Al12+7.15738.85708.868010.942510.9460
    W73+6.68878.33258.729310.782210.8983
    DownLoad: CSV
  • [1]

    Qi Y Y, Wang J G, Janev R K 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 063404Google Scholar

    [2]

    Shore B W 1975 J. Phys. B 8 2023Google Scholar

    [3]

    Qi Y Y, Wang J G, Janev R K 2011 Eur. Phys. J. D 63 327Google Scholar

    [4]

    Cooper J W 1962 Phys. Rev. 128 681Google Scholar

    [5]

    Yin R Y, Pratt R H 1987 Phys. Rev. A 35 1149Google Scholar

    [6]

    Combet-Farnoux F 1972 Proceedings of the International Conference on Inner Shell Ionization Phenomena (Vol. 2) (Atlanta: University of Georgia Press) p1130

    [7]

    Lin C Y, Ho Y K 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 033405Google Scholar

    [8]

    Lin C Y, Ho Y K 2010 Phys. Plasmas 17 093302Google Scholar

    [9]

    Lin C Y, Ho Y K 2011 Phys. Scr. T 144 014051Google Scholar

    [10]

    Xie L Y, Wang J G, Janev R K 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 063304Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zheng X, Chi H C, Lin S T, Jiang G, Qiao C, Huang K N 2019 Indian J. Phys. 93 267Google Scholar

    [12]

    Shukla P K, Eliasson B 2008 Phys. Lett. A 372 2897Google Scholar

    [13]

    Qi Y Y, Wang J G, Janev R K 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 062110Google Scholar

    [14]

    Das M 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 012709Google Scholar

    [15]

    Chen Z B, Wang K 2020 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 245 106847Google Scholar

    [16]

    Sharma R, Goyal A 2022 Indian J. Phys. 96 1829Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zeng J, Li Y, Gao C, Yuan J 2020 A& A 634 A117Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zeng J, Li Y, Yuan J 2021 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 272 107777Google Scholar

    [19]

    Li X, Rosmej F B 2020 Phys. Lett. A 384 126478Google Scholar

    [20]

    Dawra D, Dimri M, Singh A K, Jha A K S, Pandey R K, Sharma R, Mohan M 2021 Phys. Plasmas 28 112706Google Scholar

    [21]

    Singh D, Varshni Y P 1983 Phys. Rev. A 28 2606Google Scholar

    [22]

    Stanton L G, Murillo M S 2015 Phys. Rev. E 91 033104Google Scholar

    [23]

    Zhao G P, Xie L Y, Liu L, Wang J G, Janev R K 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 083302Google Scholar

    [24]

    Chen Z B, Qi Y Y, Sun H Y, Zhao G P, Liu P F, Wang K 2020 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 253 107170Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhao G P, Chen C, Liu L, Chen Z B, Qi Y Y, Wang J G 2022 Phys. Plasmas 29 053301Google Scholar

    [26]

    Baimbetov F B, Nurekenov Kh T, Ramazanov T S 1995 Phys. Lett. A 202 211Google Scholar

    [27]

    Das N, Das B, Ghoshal A 2022 Phys. Plasmas 29 073505Google Scholar

    [28]

    Chen Z B 2023 Few-Body Syst. 64 74Google Scholar

    [29]

    Chen Z B, Hu H W, Ma K, Liu X B, Guo X L, Li S, Zhu B H, Huang L, Wang K 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 032108Google Scholar

    [30]

    Xie H H, Jiao L G, Liu A, Ho Y K 2021 Int. J. Quantum Chem.   121 e26653Google Scholar

    [31]

    Wu J Y, Wu Y, Qi Y Y, Wang J G, Janev R K, Zhang S B 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 012705Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wu J Y, Qi Y Y, Cheng Y J, Wu Y, Wang J G, Janev R K, Zhang S B 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 043301Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhao G P, Qi Y Y, Liu L, Wang J G, Janev R K 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 063509Google Scholar

    [34]

    Chen C, Zhao G P, Chen Z B, Qi Y Y, Liu L, Wu Y, Wang J G 2023 Phys. Plasmas 30 123503Google Scholar

    [35]

    Qi Y Y, Ning L N, Wang J G, Qu Y Z 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 123301Google Scholar

    [36]

    Qi Y Y, Ye D D, Wang J G, Qu Y Z 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 033403Google Scholar

    [37]

    Hoarty D J, Allan P, James S F, Brown C R D, Hobbs L M R, Hill M P, Harris J W O, Morton J, Brookes M G, Shepherd R, Dunn J, Chen H, Marley E V, Beiersdorfer P, Chung H K, Lee R W, Brown G, Emig J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 265003Google Scholar

    [38]

    Gormezano C, Sips A C C, Luce T C, Ide S, Becoulet A 2007 Nucl. Fusion 47 S285Google Scholar

    [39]

    Dyall K G, Grant I P, Johnson C T, Parpia F A, Plummer E P 1989 Comput. Phys. Commun. 55 425Google Scholar

    [40]

    Grant I P 1974 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 7 1458

    [41]

    Jönsson P, He X, Froese Fischer C, Grant I P 2007 Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 597Google Scholar

    [42]

    Tews M G, Perger W F 2001 Comput. Phys. Commun. 141 205Google Scholar

    [43]

    Perger W F, Halabuka Z, Trautmann D 1993 Comput. Phys. Commun. 76 250Google Scholar

    [44]

    Landau L D, Lifshitz E M 1958 Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory (London: Pergamon

    [45]

    Bilycki M, Stachov A, Karwowski J, Mukherjee P K 2007 Chem. Phys. 331 346Google Scholar

  • [1] Zhao Ting, Gong Mao-Mao, Zhang Song-Bin. Theoretical study on photo-ionization of helium atoms by Bessel vortex light. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(24): 244201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241378
    [2] Liu Yu, Xu Zhong-Feng, Wang Xing, Zeng Li-Xia, Liu Ting. Angular distribution of characteristic X-ray emission from Fe and V following photoionization. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(4): 043201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191524
    [3] Tu Jing-Yi, Chen She, Wang Feng. Influence of photoionization rates on positive streamer branching in atmospheric air. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(9): 095202. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190060
    [4] Qi Xiao-Qiu, Wang Feng, Dai Chang-Jian. Photoexcitation and photoionization of alkali atoms. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(13): 133201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.133201
    [5] Shan Xiao-Bin, Zhao Yu-Jie, Kong Rui-Hong, Wang Si-Sheng, Sheng Liu-Si, Huang Ming-Qiang, Wang Zhen-Ya. Experimental and theoretical study of ArCO cluster. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(5): 053602. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.053602
    [6] Liu Kun, Ning Chuan-Gang, Shi Le-Lei, Miao Yu-Run, Deng Jing-Kang. Probing the distorted wave effects in (e, 2e) reaction for the outer valence orbitals of ferrocene. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(2): 023402. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.023402
    [7] Sun Chang-Ping, Wang Guo-Li, Zhou Xiao-Xin. Theoretical calculation of photonization of F3+ and Ne4+ ions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(5): 053202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.053202
    [8] Men Fu-Dian, He Xiao-Gang, Zhou Yong, Song Xin-Xiang. Relativistic effect of ultracold Fermi gas in a strong magnetic field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(10): 100502. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.100502
    [9] Fan Zhao-Lan, Men Fu-Dian, Dou Rui-Bo. Thermodynamic property of a relativistic Fermi gas trapped in hard-sphere potential. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(6): 3715-3719. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3715
    [10] Zheng Shu-Dong, Li Bo-Wen, Li Ji-Guang, Dong Chen-Zhong, Yuan Wen-Yuan. The influences of the finite nuclear size effects on the energy levels and wavefunctions of hydrogen-like ions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(3): 1556-1562. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.1556
    [11] Wang Xiang-Li, Dong Chen-Zhong, Sang Cui-Cui. Theoretical study on Ne 1s photoionization and corresponding Auger decay processes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(8): 5297-5303. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5297
    [12] Xu Hui, Sheng Zheng-Ming, Zhang Jie. Vlasov simulation of the relativistic effect on the breaking of large amplitude plasma waves. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(2): 968-976. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.968
    [13] Yang Peng-Fei, Chen Wen-Xue. The distribution and origination of electric field and charge in interface layer of superconductor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(12): 6622-6629. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6622
    [14] Wang Wei-Min, Zheng Chun-Yang. Self-focusing of ultra-intense short laser pulses in plasmas with various density distributions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(1): 310-320. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.310
    [15] Liu Ling-Tao, Wang Min-Sheng, Han Xiao-Ying, Li Jia-Ming. Photonionization and radiative recombination of Br——Comparison of rate coefficients deduced form the average atom and detailed configuration models. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(5): 2322-2327. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2322
    [16] Huang Chao-Qun, Wei Li-Xia, Yang Bin, Yang Rui, Wang Si-Sheng, Shan Xiao-Bin, Qi Fei, Zhang Yun-Wu, Sheng Liu-Si, Hao Li-Qing, Zhou Shi-Kang, Wang Zhen-Ya. Photoionization and dissociative photoionization study of HFC-152a using synchrotron radiation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(3): 1083-1088. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1083
    [17] Wang Si-Sheng, Kong Rui-Hong, Tian Zhen-Yu, Shan Xiao-Bin, Zhang Yun-Wu, Sheng Liu-Si, Wang Zhen-Ya, Hao Li-Qing, Zhou Shi-Kang. Research on photoionization of Ar·NO cluster using synchrotron radiation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(7): 3433-3437. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3433
    [18] Xu Hui, Sheng Zheng-Ming, Zhang Jie. Relativistic effects on resonance absorption in laser-plasma interaction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(10): 5354-5361. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5354
    [19] Wu Guo-Hua, Guo Hong, Liu Ming-Wei, Deng Dong-Mei, Liu Shi-Xiong. Comparison of wakefield and relativistic effects on the self-phase modulation and frequency shift of intense laser pulse propagation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(7): 3213-3220. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3213
    [20] FANG QUAN-YU, LI PING, LIU YONG, ZOU YU, QIU YU-BO. PHOTOIONIZATION CROSS SECTION AND BETHE COEFFCIENT OF Alq+(q=0—12). Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(4): 655-659. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.655
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  1829
  • PDF Downloads:  84
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  03 January 2024
  • Accepted Date:  20 January 2024
  • Available Online:  26 February 2024
  • Published Online:  20 April 2024

/

返回文章
返回