-
Molecular ions are widely distributed in the ionosphere of planetary atmospheres, and their fragmentations can generate different ions and neutral fragments. Studying the kinetic energy distribution and generation mechanism of the final products is helpful in understanding fundamental phenomena in astrophysics and plasma physics. In particular, ethane is an important molecule found in Titan and comet, its fragmentation may be involved in the generation of complex hydrocarbons, as well as the atmospheric escape processes on Titan.
In this paper, we carried out the experiment on ethane fragmentation by electron impact, focusing on the three-body fragmentation channel from C2H62+ to CH3+/CH2+/H. We directly measured the three-dimensional momenta of CH3+ and CH2+ ions, and then reconstructed the momentum of the H atom using momentum conservation law. Based on these analyses, we investigated the kinetic energy release (KER) spectrum and the fragmentation mechanisms.
In the TOF coincidence map of the ions, we observed two channels: channel (1) represents the two-body dissociation generating CH3+/CH3+, and channel (2) represents the three-body dissociation generating CH3+/CH2+/H, which is mentioned above. It is found that the neutral H from channel (2) has a wide kinetic energy distribution, ranging from 0 eV up to more than 10 eV. This feature indicates the dissociation of the C-H bond is from multiple electronic states. Since the escape threshold of H in Titan's ionosphere is 0.02 eV, the vast majority of the H atoms produced in channel (2) can escape into outer space. In addition, the kinetic energy sum of CH3+ and CH2+in channel (2) is found to be similar to the KER of channel (1), indicating that the C-H dissociation presents limited influence on the energy sum of the CH2+ and CH3+.
The corresponding fragmentation mechanism of channel (2) was also analyzed in this paper. We divided the overall KER spectrum into three parts, 0-6 eV, 6-9 eV, and 9-11 eV, and reconstructed the respective Dalitz plots and Newton diagrams under different KER conditions. In all Dalitz plots, there is a bright spot representing the concerted dissociation and a horizontal belt representing the sequential dissociation. The concerted dissociation is concluded as the main mechanism, while the sequential dissociation plays a minor role.
The bright spot in the Dalitz plot shifts from the center to the left as the KER increases. This feature arises from the following fact, the CH2+lies between the H and the CH3+ in the concerted dissociation, and it feels the recoil both from H and CH3+. Considering the Coulomb potential from CH3+ is constant, enhancing the C-H dissociation energy will decrease the CH2+ kinetic energy. The belt in the Dalitz suggests the sequential dissociation as a two-step process, the first step is the dissociation of C2H62+ to generate H and metastable C2H52+, and the second step is the fragmentation from C2H52+ to CH3+ and CH2+.
We also reconstructed the Newton diagrams under different KER conditions to give further evidence of the sequential dissociation from the metastable C2H52+, rather than from the metastable CH3+orCH4+. Indeed, for the former case, the center positions of the two half circles in Newton diagrams appear correctly. Oppositely, for the latter two cases, the center positions notably deviate from the expected values. This means the sequential dissociation from C2H52+ is dominant, which agrees excellently with the conclusion from the Dalitz plots.-
Keywords:
- ethane /
- dissociative ionization /
- three-body fragmentation /
- reaction microscope
-
[1] Mathur D 2004Phys. Rep. 391 1
[2] Adoui L, Muranaka T, Tarisien M, Legendre S, Laurent G, Cassimi A, Chesnel J Y, Fléchard X, Frémont F, Gervais B, Giglio E, Hennecart D 2006Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B-Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 245 94
[3] Aitelhadjali Z, Kessal S, Quinto M A, Oubaziz D, Champion C 2016Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 403 53
[4] Shen Z J, Wang E L, Gong M M, Shan X, Chen X J 2016J. Chem. Phys. 145 234303
[5] Chen L, Wang E L, Shan X, Shen Z J, Zhao X, Chen X J 2021Phys. Rev. A 104 032814
[6] Jiang T, Wang B, Zhang Y, Wei L, Chen S, Yu W, Zou Y, Chen L, Wei B 2019Phys. Rev. A 100 022705
[7] Duley A, Kelkar A H 2023Atoms 11 75
[8] Wang X, Zhang Y, Lu D, Lu G C, Wei B, Zhang B H, Tang Y J, Hutton R, Zou Y 2014Phys. Rev. A 90 062705
[9] Wei B, Zhang Y, Wang X, Lu D, Lu G C, Zhang B H, Tang Y J, Hutton R, Zou Y 2014J. Chem. Phys. 140 124303
[10] Zhang Y, Jiang T, Wei L, Luo D, Wang X, Yu W, Hutton R, Zou Y, Wei B 2018Phys. Rev. A 97 022703
[11] Wei L, Chen S, Zhang Y, Wang B, Yu W, Ren B, Han J, Zou Y, Chen L, Wei B 2020Eur. Phys. J. D 74 133
[12] Das N, De S, Bhatt P, Safvan C P, Majumdar A 2023J. Chem. Phys. 158 084307
[13] Yuan H, Xu S, Wang E, Xu J, Gao Y, Zhu X, Guo D, Ma B, Zhao D, Zhang S, Yan S, Zhang R, Gao Y, Xu Z, Ma X 2022J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13 7594
[14] Wang Y, Li Y, Gao Y, Chen Y, Zhou Z, Shen X, Jin G 2024Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B-Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 557 165547
[15] Abplanalp M J, Kaiser R I 2016Astrophys. J. 827 132
[16] Kim Y S, Bennett C J, Chen L H, O'Brien K, Kaiser R I 2010Astrophys. J. 711 744
[17] Russo N D, Vervack Jr R J, Weaver H A, Lisse C M 2009Icarus 200 271
[18] Kanya R, Kudou T, Schirmel N, Miura S, Weitzel K M, Hoshina K, Yamanouchi K 2012J. Chem. Phys. 136 204309
[19] Schirmel N, Reusch N, Horsch P, Weitzel K M 2013Faraday Discuss. 163 461
[20] Boran Y, Gutsev G L, Kolomenskii A A, Zhu F, Schuessler A, Strohaber J 2018J. Phys. B-At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51 035003
[21] Zhang Y, Ren B, Yang C L, Wei L, Wang B, Han J, Yu W, Qi Y, Zou Y, Chen L, Wang E, Wei B 2020Comm. Chem. 3 160
[22] Wei L, Lam C S, Zhang Y, Ren B, Han J, Wang B, Zou Y, Chen L, Lau K C, Wei B 2021J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 5789
[23] Yoshida S, Majima T, Tsuchida H, Saito M 2020X-Ray Spectrom. 49 177
[24] Moshammer R, Unverzagt M, Schmitt W, Ullrich J, Schmidt-Böcking H 1996Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B-Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 108 425
[25] Dörner R, Mergel V, Jagutzki O, Spielberger L, Ullrich J, Moshammer R, Schmidt-Böcking H 2000Phys. Rep. 330 95
[26] Ullrich J, Moshammer R, Dorn A, Dörner R, Schmidt L P H, Schmidt-Böcking H 2003Rep. Prog. Phys. 66 1463
[27] Ullrich J, Schmidt-Böcking H 1987Phys. Lett. A 125 193
[28] Guo D L, Ma X W, Feng W T, Zhang S F, Zhu X L 2011Acta Phys. Sin. 60 113401(in Chinese) [郭大龙, 马新文, 冯文天, 张少锋, 朱小龙2011物理学报 60 113401]
[29] Yan S, Zhu X L, Zhang S F, Zhao D M, Zhang P, Wei B, Ma X 2020Phys. Rev. A 102 032809
[30] Yan S, Zhang P, Stumpf V, Gokhberg K, Zhang X C, Xu S, Li B, Shen L L, Zhu X L, Feng W T, Zhang S F, Zhao D M, Ma X 2018Phys. Rev. A 97 010701
[31] Falcinelli S, Rosi M, Candori P, Vecchiocattivi F, Farrar J M, Pirani F, Balucani N, Alagia M, Richter R, Stranges, S 2014Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. LNCS 8579 554
Metrics
- Abstract views: 168
- PDF Downloads: 4
- Cited By: 0
下载:
