搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

非线性薛定谔方程的高阶分裂改进光滑粒子动力学算法

蒋涛 黄金晶 陆林广 任金莲

引用本文:
Citation:

非线性薛定谔方程的高阶分裂改进光滑粒子动力学算法

蒋涛, 黄金晶, 陆林广, 任金莲

Numerical study of nonlinear Schrödinger equation with high-order split-step corrected smoothed particle hydrodynamics method

Jiang Tao, Huang Jin-Jing, Lu Lin-Guang, Ren Jin-Lian
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 为提高传统光滑粒子动力学(SPH)方法求解高维非线性薛定谔(nonlinear Schrödinger/Gross-Pitaevskii equation, NLS/GP)方程的数值精度和计算效率, 本文首先基于高阶时间分裂思想将非线性薛定谔方程分解成线性导数项和非线性项, 其次拓展一阶对称SPH方法对复数域上线性导数部分进行显式求解, 最后引入MPI并行技术, 结合边界施加虚粒子方法给出一种能够准确、高效地求解高维NLS/GP方程的高阶分裂修正并行SPH方法. 数值模拟中, 首先对带有周期性和Dirichlet边界条件的NLS方程进行求解, 并与解析解做对比, 准确地得到了周期边界下孤立波的奇异性, 且对提出方法的数值精度、收敛速度和计算效率进行了分析; 随后, 运用给出的高阶分裂粒子方法对复杂二维和三维NLS/GP问题进行了数值预测, 并与其他数值结果进行比较, 准确地展现了非线性孤立波传播中的奇异现象和玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚态中带外旋转项的量子涡旋变化过程.
    To improve the numerical accuracy and computational efficiency of solving high-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger/Gross-Pitaevskii (NLS/GP) equation by using traditional SPH method, a high-order split-step coupled with a corrected parallel SPH (HSS-CPSPH) method is developed by applying virtual particles to the boundary. The improvements are described as follows. Firstly, the nonlinear Schrödinger equation is divided into linear derivative term and nonlinear term based on the high-order split-step method. Then, the linear derivative term is solved by extending the first-order symmetric SPH method in explicit time integration. Meanwhile, the MPI parallel technique is introduced to enhance the computational efficiency. In this work, the accuracy, convergence and the computational efficiency of the proposed method are tested by solving the NLS equations with the periodic and Dirichlet boundary conditions, and compared with the analytical solutions. Also, the singularity of solitary waves under the periodic boundary condition is accurately obtained using the proposed particle method. Subsequently, the proposed HSS-CPSPH method is used to predict the results of complex two-dimensional and three-dimensioanl GP problems which are compared with other numerical results. The phenomenon of singular sharp angle in the propagation of nonlinear solitary wave and the process of quantum vortex under Bose-Einstein condensates with external rotation are presented accurately.
      通信作者: 任金莲, rjl20081223@126.com
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11501495, 51779215)、中国博士后科学基金(批准号: 2015M581869, 2015T80589)、江苏省自然科学基金(批准号: BK20150436)、国家科技支撑计划(批准号: 2015BAD24B02-02)、江苏高校品牌专业建设工程(批准号: PPZY2015B109)和江苏省大学生科技创新项目 (批准号: 201611117016Z) 资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Ren Jin-Lian, rjl20081223@126.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11501495, 51779215), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 2015M581869, 2015T80589), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. BK20150436), the National Key Technologies Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2015BAD24B02-02), the Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China (Grant No. PPZY2015B109), and the Undergraduate Research and Innovation Project of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. 201611117016Z).
    [1]

    Bandrauk A D, Shen H 1994 J. Phys. A: Gen. Phys. 27 7147Google Scholar

    [2]

    Yoshida H 1990 Phys. Lett. A 150 262Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wang T C, Guo B L, Xu Q B 2013 J. Comput. Phys. 243 382Google Scholar

    [4]

    Cheng R J, Cheng Y M 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 020203Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wang D S, Xue Y S, Zhang Z F 2016 Rom. J. Phys. 61 827

    [6]

    Bao W Z, Wang H Q 2006 J. Comput. Phys. 217 612Google Scholar

    [7]

    Bao W Z, Shen J 2005 SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26 2010Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wang H Q 2005 Appl. Math. Comput. 170 17Google Scholar

    [9]

    Chen R Y, Nie L R, Chen C Y 2018 Chaos 28 053115Google Scholar

    [10]

    Chen RY, Nie L R, Chen C Y, Wang C J 2017 J. Stat. Mech. 2017 013201Google Scholar

    [11]

    Chen R Y, Pan W L, Zhang J Q, Nie L R 2016 Chaos 26 093113Google Scholar

    [12]

    Chen R Y, Tong L M, Nie L R , Wang C I, Pan W 2017 Physica A 468 532Google Scholar

    [13]

    Gao Y L, Mei L Q 2016 Appl. Numer. Math. 109 41Google Scholar

    [14]

    Xu Y, Shu C W 2005 J. Comput. Phys. 205 72−97Google Scholar

    [15]

    Jiang T, Chen Z C, Lu W G, Yuan J Y, Wang D S 2018 Comput. Phys. Commun. 231 19Google Scholar

    [16]

    Liu M B, Liu G R 2010 Arch. Comput. Meth. Eng. 17 25Google Scholar

    [17]

    蒋涛, 陈振超, 任金莲, 李刚 2017 物理学报 66 130201Google Scholar

    Jiang T, Chen Z C, Ren J L, Li G 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 130201Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chen J K, Beraun J E 2000 Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 190 225Google Scholar

    [19]

    Liu G R, Liu M B 2003 Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Mesh-free Particle Method (Singapore: World Scientific)

    [20]

    Crespo A J C, Domínguez J M, Rogers B D, Gómez-Gesteira M, Longshaw S, Canelas R, Vacondio R, Barreiro A, García-Feal O 2015 Comput. Phys. Commun. 187 204Google Scholar

    [21]

    Ren J L, Jiang T, Lu W G, Li G 2016 Comput. Phys. Commun. 205 87Google Scholar

    [22]

    刘谋斌, 常建忠 2010 物理学报 59 3654Google Scholar

    Liu M B, Chang J Z 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 3654Google Scholar

    [23]

    Sun P N, Colagrosso A, Marrone S, Zhang A M 2016 Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 305 849Google Scholar

    [24]

    Huang C, Lei J M, Liu M B, Peng X Y 2015 Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 78 691Google Scholar

    [25]

    Huang C, Zhang D H, Shi Y X, Si Y L, Huang B 2018 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 113 179Google Scholar

    [26]

    Weideman J A C, Herbst B M 1986 SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 23 485Google Scholar

  • 图 1  ${k_{\rm{1}}} = {k_{\rm{2}}} = 1,\;h = {\text{π}}/64$时不同时刻$u\left( {x,{\text{π}}} \right)$的实部沿x轴的变化 (a) $t=1$; (b) $t = 3$

    Fig. 1.  Curve of the $\operatorname{Re} \left( {u\left( {x,{\text{π}}} \right)} \right)$ along x-axis at different time with ${k_{\rm{1}}} = {k_{\rm{2}}} = 1,\;h = {\text{π}}/64$: (a) $t=1$; (b) $t = 3$.

    图 2  ${k_{\rm{1}}} = {k_{\rm{2}}} = 4,\;h = {\text{π}}/128$时不同时刻$u\left( {x,{\text{π}}} \right)$的实部沿x轴的变化 (a) t = 0.1; (b) t = 1

    Fig. 2.  Curve of the $\operatorname{Re} \left( {u\left( {x,{\text{π}}} \right)} \right)$ along x-axis at different time with ${k_{\rm{1}}} = {k_{\rm{2}}} = 4,\;h = {\text{π}}/128$: (a) t = 0.1; (b) t = 1.

    图 4  初始条件2下, 在4个不同时刻三孤立子波函数$\left| u \right|$的传播过程 (a) $t=0$; (b) $t = 20$; (c) $t = 30$; (d) $t = 50$

    Fig. 4.  Solitary wave propagation process of $\left| u \right|$ at different time with initial condition 2: (a) $t=0$; (b) $t = 20$; (c) $t = 30$; (d) $t = 50$.

    图 3  初始条件1下, 在4个不同时刻孤立波函数$\left| u \right|$的传播过程 (a) $t = 0$; (b) $t = 20$; (c) $t = 30$; (d) $t = 50$

    Fig. 3.  Solitary wave propagation process of $\left| u \right|$ at different time with the initial condition 1: (a) $t = 0$; (b) $t = 20$; (c) $t = 30$; (d) $t = 50$.

    图 5  在两个不同时刻不同数值方法得到的$\left| u \right|$等值线图 (a) $t = 0$; (b) $t = 0.108$

    Fig. 5.  Contours of $\left| u \right|$ obtained using different methods at two different times: (a) $t = 0$; (b) $t = 0.108$.

    图 6  不同时刻${\left| u \right|^2}$沿y$\left( {x = 0,z = 0} \right)$变化曲线

    Fig. 6.  Curve of ${\left| u \right|^2}$ along y-axis $\left( {x = 0,z = 0} \right)$ at different time.

    图 7  在3个不同时刻${\left| u \right|^2}$在不同截面上的等值线 (a) $\left( {0,y,z} \right)$截面; (b)$\left( {x,y,0} \right)$截面

    Fig. 7.  Contour of ${\left| u \right|^2}$ along different profile at different time: (a) $\left( {0,y,z} \right)$; (b) $\left( {x,y,0} \right)$.

    图 8  两个不同时刻下$\left| {{u_1}} \right|$沿$x$轴($y$ = 0.5)的变化 (a) $t$ = 0.05; (b) $t$ = 0.25

    Fig. 8.  Curve of $\left| {{u_1}} \right|$ along x-axis ($y$ = 0.5) at two different time: (a) $t$ = 0.05; (b) $t$ = 0.25.

    图 9  两个不同时刻下t = 0 (第一列)和t = 0.25 (第二列)三个物理量等值线变化 (a1), (a2) $ {\rm Re} ({u_1}) $; (b1), (b2) ${\rm Im} ({u_1})$; (c1), (c2) $\left| {{u_1}} \right|$

    Fig. 9.  Contours of three physical quantities at two different times t = 0 (the first row) and t = 0.25 (the second row): (a1), (a2) $\operatorname{Re} ({u_1})$; (b1), (b2) $\operatorname{Im} ({u_1})$; (c1), (c2) $\left| {{u_1}} \right|$.

    表 1  ${k_{\rm{1}}} = {k_{\rm{2}}} = 1,h = {\text{π}}/64$时几个不同时刻里两种方法的误差${e_{\rm{m}}}$

    Table 1.  Error ${e_{\rm{m}}}$ obtained using two different methods at different time (${k_{\rm{1}}} = {k_{\rm{2}}} = 1,h = {\text{π}}/64$).

    时间tSS-ICPSPHHSS-CPSPH
    0.51.697 × 10–31.696 × 10–3
    13.616 × 10–32.494 × 10–3
    27.347 × 10–34.857 × 10–3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  ${k_{\rm{1}}} = {k_{\rm{2}}} = 1$, 时间t = 1时, 两种方法在不同粒子间距下的误差和收敛阶

    Table 2.  Error ${e_{\rm{m}}}$ and convergent order $o{r_{\rm{\alpha }}}$ obtained using two different methods at $t=1$ and different particle distance (${k_1} = {k_2} = 1$).

    $h = {\text{π}}/32$$h = {\text{π}}/64$$h = {\text{π}}/128$
    ${e_{\rm{m}}}$$o{r_{\rm{\alpha }}}$${e_{\rm{m}}}$$o{r_{\rm{\alpha }}}$${e_{\rm{m}}}$$o{r_{\rm{\alpha }}}$
    SS-ICPSPH1.381 × 10–23.616 × 10–31.9339.0412 × 10–42.00
    HSS-CPSPH1.381 × 10–22.494 × 10–32.474.498 × 10–42.47
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  ${k_{\rm{1}}} = {k_{\rm{2}}} = 1,h = {\text{π}}/64$时, 粒子分布均匀或不均匀方式下, 两种方法的误差${e_{\rm{m}}}$

    Table 3.  Error ${e_{\rm{m}}}$ obtained using different methods at different distribution (${k_1} = {k_2} = 1$,$h = {\text{π}}/64$).

    均匀分布粒子非均匀分布情形1非均匀分布情形2
    $t = 0.1$$t = 1$$t = 0.1$$t = 1$$t = 0.1$$t = 1$
    SS-ICPSPH2.776 × 10–43.616 × 10–32.944 × 10–43.818 × 10–33.116 × 10–44.082 × 10–3
    HSS-CPSPH2.774 × 10–42.494 × 10–32.886 × 10–42.527 × 10–32.967 × 10–42.578 × 10–3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  $h = {\text{π}}/64$时, 三个不同时刻两种方法的最大误差${e_{\rm{m}}}$

    Table 4.  Error ${e_{\rm{m}}}$ obtained using two different methods at three times ($h = {\text{π}}/64$).

    时间tSS-ICPSPHHSS-CPSPH
    0.59.131 × 10–44.512 × 10–4
    11.828 × 10–38.135 × 10–4
    23.658 × 10–31.623 × 10–3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  t = 1时不同空间步长情况下两种粒子方法的误差和收敛阶

    Table 5.  Error and order of convergence by different methods at t = 1 and different h.

    $h = {\text{π}}/32$$h = {\text{π}}/64$$h = {\text{π}}/128$
    ${e_{\rm{m}}}$$o{r_{\rm{\alpha }}}$${e_{\rm{m}}}$$o{r_{\rm{\alpha }}}$${e_{\rm{m}}}$$o{r_{\rm{\alpha }}}$
    SS-ICPSPH7.553 × 10–31.828 × 10–32.0464.316 × 10–42.082
    HSS-CPSPH4.534 × 10–38.135 × 10–42.4761.379 × 10–42.560
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 6  粒子数为${161^3}$时, 不同CPU个数下运行到不同步数所需时间(单位: s)

    Table 6.  Consumed CPU time (unit: s) of different calculated time step with particle number ${161^3}$ at different CPUs.

    CPU数量步数相对加速比S
    num = 1num = 10num = 1000
    297805.91075081174728
    1216716.918516.7215526.7
    248388.879404.37120284.371.792
    365603.296344.9887524.982.462
    722948.833189.2448564.284.438
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 7  在不同粒子数下不同CPU个数下, 运行到1000步时平均每步所消耗时间(单位: s)

    Table 7.  The average consumed CPU time (unit: s) of calculated time step 1000 with different particle number and different CPUs.

    粒子数CPU数量
    212243672
    ${121^3}$449.5582.92645.96235.00019.585
    ${161^3}$1076.922198.810111.9081.92247.363
    ${181^3}$1558.445292.711164.838120.88665.437
    ${201^3}$2190.921425.688235.775179.85696.836
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Bandrauk A D, Shen H 1994 J. Phys. A: Gen. Phys. 27 7147Google Scholar

    [2]

    Yoshida H 1990 Phys. Lett. A 150 262Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wang T C, Guo B L, Xu Q B 2013 J. Comput. Phys. 243 382Google Scholar

    [4]

    Cheng R J, Cheng Y M 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 020203Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wang D S, Xue Y S, Zhang Z F 2016 Rom. J. Phys. 61 827

    [6]

    Bao W Z, Wang H Q 2006 J. Comput. Phys. 217 612Google Scholar

    [7]

    Bao W Z, Shen J 2005 SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26 2010Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wang H Q 2005 Appl. Math. Comput. 170 17Google Scholar

    [9]

    Chen R Y, Nie L R, Chen C Y 2018 Chaos 28 053115Google Scholar

    [10]

    Chen RY, Nie L R, Chen C Y, Wang C J 2017 J. Stat. Mech. 2017 013201Google Scholar

    [11]

    Chen R Y, Pan W L, Zhang J Q, Nie L R 2016 Chaos 26 093113Google Scholar

    [12]

    Chen R Y, Tong L M, Nie L R , Wang C I, Pan W 2017 Physica A 468 532Google Scholar

    [13]

    Gao Y L, Mei L Q 2016 Appl. Numer. Math. 109 41Google Scholar

    [14]

    Xu Y, Shu C W 2005 J. Comput. Phys. 205 72−97Google Scholar

    [15]

    Jiang T, Chen Z C, Lu W G, Yuan J Y, Wang D S 2018 Comput. Phys. Commun. 231 19Google Scholar

    [16]

    Liu M B, Liu G R 2010 Arch. Comput. Meth. Eng. 17 25Google Scholar

    [17]

    蒋涛, 陈振超, 任金莲, 李刚 2017 物理学报 66 130201Google Scholar

    Jiang T, Chen Z C, Ren J L, Li G 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 130201Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chen J K, Beraun J E 2000 Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 190 225Google Scholar

    [19]

    Liu G R, Liu M B 2003 Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Mesh-free Particle Method (Singapore: World Scientific)

    [20]

    Crespo A J C, Domínguez J M, Rogers B D, Gómez-Gesteira M, Longshaw S, Canelas R, Vacondio R, Barreiro A, García-Feal O 2015 Comput. Phys. Commun. 187 204Google Scholar

    [21]

    Ren J L, Jiang T, Lu W G, Li G 2016 Comput. Phys. Commun. 205 87Google Scholar

    [22]

    刘谋斌, 常建忠 2010 物理学报 59 3654Google Scholar

    Liu M B, Chang J Z 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 3654Google Scholar

    [23]

    Sun P N, Colagrosso A, Marrone S, Zhang A M 2016 Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 305 849Google Scholar

    [24]

    Huang C, Lei J M, Liu M B, Peng X Y 2015 Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 78 691Google Scholar

    [25]

    Huang C, Zhang D H, Shi Y X, Si Y L, Huang B 2018 Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 113 179Google Scholar

    [26]

    Weideman J A C, Herbst B M 1986 SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 23 485Google Scholar

  • [1] 许晓阳, 周亚丽, 余鹏. eXtended Pom-Pom黏弹性流体的改进光滑粒子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2023, 72(3): 034701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221922
    [2] 蒋涛, 陈振超, 任金莲, 李刚. 基于修正并行光滑粒子动力学方法三维变系数瞬态热传导问题的模拟. 物理学报, 2017, 66(13): 130201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.130201
    [3] 崔少燕, 吕欣欣, 辛杰. 广义非线性薛定谔方程描述的波坍缩及其演变. 物理学报, 2016, 65(4): 040201. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.040201
    [4] 刘虎, 强洪夫, 陈福振, 韩亚伟, 范树佳. 一种新型光滑粒子动力学固壁边界施加模型. 物理学报, 2015, 64(9): 094701. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.094701
    [5] 马理强, 苏铁熊, 刘汉涛, 孟青. 微液滴振荡过程的光滑粒子动力学方法数值模拟. 物理学报, 2015, 64(13): 134702. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.134702
    [6] 雷娟棉, 杨浩, 黄灿. 基于弱可压与不可压光滑粒子动力学方法的封闭方腔自然对流数值模拟及算法对比. 物理学报, 2014, 63(22): 224701. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.224701
    [7] 蒋涛, 任金莲, 徐磊, 陆林广. 非等温非牛顿黏性流体流动问题的修正光滑粒子动力学方法模拟. 物理学报, 2014, 63(21): 210203. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.210203
    [8] 蒋涛, 陆林广, 陆伟刚. 等直径微液滴碰撞过程的改进光滑粒子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2013, 62(22): 224701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.224701
    [9] 苏铁熊, 马理强, 刘谋斌, 常建忠. 基于光滑粒子动力学方法的液滴冲击固壁面问题数值模拟. 物理学报, 2013, 62(6): 064702. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.064702
    [10] 杨秀峰, 刘谋斌. 光滑粒子动力学SPH方法应力不稳定性的一种改进方案. 物理学报, 2012, 61(22): 224701. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.224701
    [11] 马理强, 刘谋斌, 常建忠, 苏铁熊, 刘汉涛. 液滴冲击液膜问题的光滑粒子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2012, 61(24): 244701. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.244701
    [12] 马理强, 常建忠, 刘汉涛, 刘谋斌. 液滴溅落问题的光滑粒子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2012, 61(5): 054701. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.054701
    [13] 蒋涛, 欧阳洁, 赵晓凯, 任金莲. 黏性液滴变形过程的核梯度修正光滑粒子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2011, 60(5): 054701. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.054701
    [14] 刘谋斌, 常建忠. 光滑粒子动力学方法中粒子分布与数值稳定性分析. 物理学报, 2010, 59(6): 3654-3662. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3654
    [15] 宋诗艳, 王晶, 王建步, 宋莎莎, 孟俊敏. 应用非线性薛定谔方程模拟深海内波的传播. 物理学报, 2010, 59(9): 6339-6344. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6339
    [16] 栾仕霞, 张秋菊, 武慧春, 盛政明. 激光脉冲在等离子体中的压缩分裂. 物理学报, 2008, 57(6): 3646-3652. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3646
    [17] 雷 霆, 涂成厚, 李恩邦, 李勇男, 郭文刚, 魏 岱, 朱 辉, 吕福云. 高能量无波分裂超短脉冲自相似传输的理论研究和数值模拟. 物理学报, 2007, 56(5): 2769-2775. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2769
    [18] 龚伦训. 非线性薛定谔方程的Jacobi椭圆函数解. 物理学报, 2006, 55(9): 4414-4419. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4414
    [19] 阮航宇, 李慧军. 用推广的李群约化法求解非线性薛定谔方程. 物理学报, 2005, 54(3): 996-1001. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.996
    [20] 阮航宇, 陈一新. (2+1)维非线性薛定谔方程的环孤子,dromion,呼吸子和瞬子. 物理学报, 2001, 50(4): 586-592. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.586
计量
  • 文章访问数:  9585
  • PDF下载量:  123
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-01-29
  • 修回日期:  2019-02-24
  • 上网日期:  2019-05-01
  • 刊出日期:  2019-05-05

/

返回文章
返回