-
水下无线光通信技术为深海勘探和海洋资源开发利用带来了一种效率高且可靠性强的通信新方案. 本文采用490 nm垂直外腔面发射激光器作为光源, 基于声光外调制技术, 采用脉冲位置调制方式(pulse-position modulation, PPM)搭建了长距离水下无线光通信系统. 结合光源的优势并经过软判决算法优化PPM解调来提升水下通信性能, 采用64 PPM调制, 成功实现了96 m的水下传输距离, 在50 MHz时隙频率下得到传输的误码率为1.9 × 10–5. 同时测量到采用软判决解调相较于硬判决解调在性能增益上有着大约2 dB的提升, 验证了软判决算法在提升水下通信性能方面相比硬判决算法的显著优势.
-
关键词:
- 垂直外腔面发射激光器 /
- 脉冲位置调制 /
- 软判决算法 /
- 水下无线光通信
The exploration and utilization of marine resources has promoted the rapid development of marine science and technology, and has put forward higher requirements for underwater communication technology. Long distance underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC) requires the selection of light source on the transmitter side. Laser diodes (LDs) have excellent portability and maneuverability, and have been widely used in the UWOC systems. However, their beam quality is not so good and it is difficult to modulate under high power. In recent years, vertical-external-cavity surface-emitting laser (VECSEL) has received much attention due to its high output power and good beam quality. This work is to explore the advantages of using a 490-nm blue VECSEL as a light source in UWOC, and to improve the performance of the UWOC system by the soft-decision pulse-position modulation (PPM). First, the optical power attenuation coefficient of the channel is obtained, and the measured c is about 0.0591 m–1 in a 96-m-long tap channel. Subsequently, soft-decision and hard-decision are simulated and experimentally verified. Both simulations and measurements show that the bit error rate (BER) can be significantly reduced with soft-decision. Afterwards, we improve the system by using the soft-decision algorithm and investigate the communication performance of 64 PPMs at different bandwidths by adjusting the PPM signal rate. Finally, 50 MHz is chosen as a signal rate in the experiment. Then a UWOC system is demonstrated in this work. The transmitter side consists of a 490-nm VECSEL light source with an acousto-optic modulator (AOM). The pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) is loaded into the arbitrary waveform generator (AWG) for digital-to-analog conversion after PPM modulation, and the analog signal is sent to the driver of the AOM for acousto-optic modulation of the incident beam. The laser is focused before entering the AOM and then collimated after having exited to reduce its divergence. The modulated laser beam passes through a distance of 96 m in the tank by using multiple mirrors on both sides of the tank. Then, the beam is focused by a lens to the avalanche photodiode (APD) for photoelectric conversion in the end, and the signal is processed by a mixed signal oscilloscope (MSO) after data acquisition. A soft-decision algorithm is introduced to further optimize the performance of the PPM modulation. When the optical signal passes through a relatively long distance of 96 m, the measured BER is as low as 1.9 × 10–5. This indicates that the soft-decision PPM-based 490 nm blue VECSEL UWOC system performs very well.-
Keywords:
- vertical external-cavity surface-emitting lasers /
- pulse-position modulation /
- soft decision algorithms /
- underwater wireless optical communications
[1] Heidemann J, Stojanovic M, Zorzi M 2012 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 370 158
[2] Tian P, Liu X, Yi S, Huang Y, Zhang S, Zhou X, Hu L, Zheng L, Liu R 2017 Opt. Express 25 1193Google Scholar
[3] Kaushal H, Kaddoum G 2016 IEEE Access 4 1518Google Scholar
[4] Saeed N, Celik A, Al-Naffouri T Y, Alouini M S 2019 Ad Hoc Networks 94 101935Google Scholar
[5] Mobley C D, Gentili B, Gordon H R, Jin Z, Kattawar G W, Morel A, Reinersman P, Stamnes K, Stavn R H 1993 Appl. Opt. 32 7484Google Scholar
[6] Bricaud A, Babin M, Morel A, Claustre H 1995 J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 100 13321Google Scholar
[7] 李军, 罗江华, 元秀华 2021 光学学报 41 0706005Google Scholar
Li J, Luo J H, Yuan X H 2021 Acta Opt. Sin. 41 0706005Google Scholar
[8] 王宝鹏, 余锦, 王云哲, 孟晶晶, 貊泽强, 王金舵, 代守军, 何建国, 王晓东 2020 激光与光电子学进展 57 230604Google Scholar
Wang B P, Yu J, Wang Y Z, Meng J J, Mo Ze Qiang, Wang J D, Dai S J, He J G, Wang X D 2020 Laser Optoelectron. P. 57 230604Google Scholar
[9] Wu Z Y, Liu X Y, Wang J S, Wang J 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 4570Google Scholar
[10] Ghassemlooy Z, Popoola W, Rajbhandari S 2019 Optical Wireless Communications: System and Channel Modelling with Matlab® (Boca Raton: CRC Press
[11] Fei C, Wang Y, Du J, Chen R, Lv N, Zhang G, Tian J, Hong X, He S 2022 Opt. Express 30 2326Google Scholar
[12] Qi Z, Wang L, Liu P, Bai M, Yu G, Wang Y 2023 Opt. Express 31 9330Google Scholar
[13] Wang J, Lu C, Li S, Xu Z 2019 Opt. Express 27 12171Google Scholar
[14] 黄安, 殷洪玺, 季秀阳, 梁彦军, 文浩, 王建英, 沈众卫 2024 光学学报 44 0606002Google Scholar
Huang A, Yin H X, Ji X Y, Liang Y J, Wen H, Wang J Y, Shen Z W 2024 Acta Opt. Sin. 44 0606002Google Scholar
[15] Shen J, Wang J, Yu C, Chen X, Wu J, Zhao M, Qu F, Xu Z, Han J, Xu J 2019 Opt. Commun. 438 78Google Scholar
[16] Yan Q R, Wang M, Dai W H, Wang Y H 2021 Opt. Commun. 495 127024Google Scholar
[17] Han X T, Li P, Li G Y, Chang C, Jia S W, Xie Z, Liao P X, Nie W C, Xie X P 2023 Photonics 10 451Google Scholar
[18] Bossert M, Schulz R, Bitzer S 2022 IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 68 7107Google Scholar
[19] Zhang C, Zhang Y, Tong Z, Zou H, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Lin G, Xu J 2022 Opt. Express 30 38663Google Scholar
[20] Hu S, Mi L, Zhou T, Chen W 2018 Opt. Express 26 21685Google Scholar
[21] Guina M, Rantamäki A, Härkönen A 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 383001
[22] Rahimi-Iman A 2016 J. Opt. 18 093003Google Scholar
[23] Rudin B, Rutz A, Hoffmann M, Maas D J, Bellancourt A R, Gini E, Südmeyer T, Keller U 2008 Opt. Lett. 33 2719Google Scholar
[24] Heinen B, Wang T L, Sparenberg M, Weber A, Kunert B, Hader J, Koch S W, Moloney J V, Koch M, Stolz W 2012 Electron. Lett. 48 11Google Scholar
[25] Yan R, Zhu R, Wu Y, Wang T, Jiang L, Lu H, Song Y, Zhang P 2023 Appl. Phys. Lett. 123 011106Google Scholar
-
-
[1] Heidemann J, Stojanovic M, Zorzi M 2012 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 370 158
[2] Tian P, Liu X, Yi S, Huang Y, Zhang S, Zhou X, Hu L, Zheng L, Liu R 2017 Opt. Express 25 1193Google Scholar
[3] Kaushal H, Kaddoum G 2016 IEEE Access 4 1518Google Scholar
[4] Saeed N, Celik A, Al-Naffouri T Y, Alouini M S 2019 Ad Hoc Networks 94 101935Google Scholar
[5] Mobley C D, Gentili B, Gordon H R, Jin Z, Kattawar G W, Morel A, Reinersman P, Stamnes K, Stavn R H 1993 Appl. Opt. 32 7484Google Scholar
[6] Bricaud A, Babin M, Morel A, Claustre H 1995 J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 100 13321Google Scholar
[7] 李军, 罗江华, 元秀华 2021 光学学报 41 0706005Google Scholar
Li J, Luo J H, Yuan X H 2021 Acta Opt. Sin. 41 0706005Google Scholar
[8] 王宝鹏, 余锦, 王云哲, 孟晶晶, 貊泽强, 王金舵, 代守军, 何建国, 王晓东 2020 激光与光电子学进展 57 230604Google Scholar
Wang B P, Yu J, Wang Y Z, Meng J J, Mo Ze Qiang, Wang J D, Dai S J, He J G, Wang X D 2020 Laser Optoelectron. P. 57 230604Google Scholar
[9] Wu Z Y, Liu X Y, Wang J S, Wang J 2018 Opt. Lett. 43 4570Google Scholar
[10] Ghassemlooy Z, Popoola W, Rajbhandari S 2019 Optical Wireless Communications: System and Channel Modelling with Matlab® (Boca Raton: CRC Press
[11] Fei C, Wang Y, Du J, Chen R, Lv N, Zhang G, Tian J, Hong X, He S 2022 Opt. Express 30 2326Google Scholar
[12] Qi Z, Wang L, Liu P, Bai M, Yu G, Wang Y 2023 Opt. Express 31 9330Google Scholar
[13] Wang J, Lu C, Li S, Xu Z 2019 Opt. Express 27 12171Google Scholar
[14] 黄安, 殷洪玺, 季秀阳, 梁彦军, 文浩, 王建英, 沈众卫 2024 光学学报 44 0606002Google Scholar
Huang A, Yin H X, Ji X Y, Liang Y J, Wen H, Wang J Y, Shen Z W 2024 Acta Opt. Sin. 44 0606002Google Scholar
[15] Shen J, Wang J, Yu C, Chen X, Wu J, Zhao M, Qu F, Xu Z, Han J, Xu J 2019 Opt. Commun. 438 78Google Scholar
[16] Yan Q R, Wang M, Dai W H, Wang Y H 2021 Opt. Commun. 495 127024Google Scholar
[17] Han X T, Li P, Li G Y, Chang C, Jia S W, Xie Z, Liao P X, Nie W C, Xie X P 2023 Photonics 10 451Google Scholar
[18] Bossert M, Schulz R, Bitzer S 2022 IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 68 7107Google Scholar
[19] Zhang C, Zhang Y, Tong Z, Zou H, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Lin G, Xu J 2022 Opt. Express 30 38663Google Scholar
[20] Hu S, Mi L, Zhou T, Chen W 2018 Opt. Express 26 21685Google Scholar
[21] Guina M, Rantamäki A, Härkönen A 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 383001
[22] Rahimi-Iman A 2016 J. Opt. 18 093003Google Scholar
[23] Rudin B, Rutz A, Hoffmann M, Maas D J, Bellancourt A R, Gini E, Südmeyer T, Keller U 2008 Opt. Lett. 33 2719Google Scholar
[24] Heinen B, Wang T L, Sparenberg M, Weber A, Kunert B, Hader J, Koch S W, Moloney J V, Koch M, Stolz W 2012 Electron. Lett. 48 11Google Scholar
[25] Yan R, Zhu R, Wu Y, Wang T, Jiang L, Lu H, Song Y, Zhang P 2023 Appl. Phys. Lett. 123 011106Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 1321
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 0