-
采用B3LYP/6-311++g(3df, 3pd)方法和基组对氟利昂物质CFC-11 (CFCl3)分子进行了一系列的理论研究. 包括了该分子的基态结构、电偶极矩、总能量、最高占据分子轨道能级EH和最低未占据分子轨道能级EL、能隙、红外与拉曼光谱性质、C—F键解离, 并探讨电场对该分子的影响. 结果表明: 基态结构优化后的理论计算值和实验值的最大误差低于2%, C—F键受电场强度的增大而被拉长, 能隙Eg随EH和EL的变化出现先增大后减小; 电场影响着CFC-11分子的红外与拉曼光谱吸收强度, 红外与拉曼光谱随着电场变化出现红移或蓝移现象. 电场可作为一种辅助手段对其重叠或准重叠谱线进行分离. 势阱深度随反向电场逐渐增大而减小, 直至消失, 使得C—F键的束缚能力逐渐减弱. 本文有望为实现CFC-11分子最终发生解离而降解提供一种可行有效的调控手段.The ozone layer in the stratosphere of the earth’s atmosphere, which can be destroyed by CFC-11 molecule, plays a crucial role in human survival because it can absorb most of the harmful radiation from the sun and effectively protect the earth’s biology. Therefore, it is of evident significance to investigate the properties of CFC-11 molecule. By Motivated by this and the adoption of B3LYP complex function at a level of 6-311++g(3df, 3pd) basis set, we carry out a series of theoretical studies of the Freon material CFC-11 (CFCl3) molecules, including the studies of the equilibrium structure, electric dipole moment, total energy, the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) level, energy gap, infrared and Raman spectrum, C—F dissociation characteristics of CFC-11 molecule, and the effect of the applied electric field on CFC-11 molecule as well. The results show that the maximum error between the theoretical calculation value and the experimental value is less than 2% for an optimized ground state structure; the C—F bond length and C—Cl bond length extend with the increase of electric field intensity, but the degree of change of C—F bond length is much stronger than that of C—Cl; the HOMO energy level and total energy go up and then come down as the external field rises, while the LUMO energy level goes up as the field increases. The energy gap Eg first increases and then decreases with the variation of EH and EL. The dipole moment without electric field is a minimum value, and the external electric field leads the molecular polarity to increase and the molecular activity to strengthen. The electric field influences the absorption intensity of infrared and Raman spectrum. The infrared and Raman spectrum move toward the long wave under the action of positive electric field, while they move toward the short wave under the action of negative electric field. The red- or blue-shift of infrared and Raman spectrum occur with the change of electric field. The electric field can be adopted as an auxiliary means to separate the overlapping or quasi-overlapping spectral lines. The potential well depth decreases with the increase of the reverse electric field until it vanishes, which causes the bound state ability of C—F bond of CFC-11 molecule to gradually degrade. This paper is expected to provide a feasible and effective tunable means for the final dissociation and degradation of CFC-11 molecules.
[1] Stratford J 2002 Estimating CFC Releases from Cutting of Fridges (Scottish: Scottish Environment Protection Agency) p1
[2] Molina M J, Rowland F S 1974 Nature 249 810
Google Scholar
[3] Farman J C, Gardiner B G, Shanklin J D 1985 Nature 315 207
Google Scholar
[4] Vollmer M K, Young D, Trudinger C M, Mühle J, Henne S, Rigby M, Park S, Li S, Guillevic M, Mitrevski B, Harth C M, Miller B R, Reimann S, Yao B, Steele L P, Wyss S A, Lunder C R, Arduini J, McCulloch A, Wu S H, Rhee T S, Wang R H J, Salameh P K, Hermansen O, Hill M, Langenfelds R L, Ivy D, O’Doherty S, Krummel P B , Maione M, Etheridge D M, Zhou L X, Fraser P J, Prinn R G, Weiss R F, Simmonds P G 2018 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18 979
Google Scholar
[5] Schuck T J, Lefrancois F, Gallmann F, Wang D, Jesswein M, Hoker J, Bönisch H, Engel A 2018 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18 16553
Google Scholar
[6] LeedhamElvidge E, Bönisch H, Brenninkmeijer C A, Engel A, Fraser P J, Gallacher E, Langenfelds R, Mühle J, Oram D E, Ray E A, Ridley A R, Röckmann T, Sturges W T, Weiss R F, Laube J C 2018 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18 3369
Google Scholar
[7] Warner M J, Bullister J L, Wisegarver D P, Gammon R H, Weiss R F 1996 J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 101 20525
Google Scholar
[8] Willey D A, Fine R A, Sonnerup R E, Bullister J L, Smethie Jr W M, Warner M J 2004 Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 L01303
Google Scholar
[9] Font R, Fullana A, Caballero J A, Candela J, Garcıa A 2001 J. Anal. Appl. 58−59 63
Google Scholar
[10] Cullis C F, Hirschler M M 1981 The Combustion of Organic Polymers (London: Clarendon Press Oxford) p120
[11] Lattimer R P, Williams R C 2002 J. Anal. Appl. Pyroly. 63 85
Google Scholar
[12] 刘玉柱, 肖韶荣, 王俊锋, 何仲福, 邱学军, Gregor Knopp 2016 物理学报 65 113301
Google Scholar
Liu Y Z, Xiao S R Wang J F, He Z F, Qiu X J, Gregor K 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 113301
Google Scholar
[13] 侯健, 韩功元, 张振满, 潘循皙, 侯惠奇 1999 复旦学报 (自然科学版) 38 627
Hou J, Han G Y, Zhang Z M, Pan X X, Hou H Q 1999 J. Fudan Univ. (Natural Science)
38 627 [14] 谢安东, 谢晶, 周玲玲, 伍冬兰, 阮文, 罗文浪 2016 原子与分子物理学报 33 989
Xie A D, Xie J, Zhou L L, Wu D L, Ruan W, Luo W L 2016 Chin. J. Atom. Mol. Phys. 33 989
[15] 尹文怡, 刘玉柱, 林华, 李炳生, 秦朝朝 2018 光谱学与光谱分析 38 21
Yin W Y, Liu Y Z, Lin H, Li B S, Qin C C 2018 Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 38 21
[16] 李亚莎, 谢云龙, 黄太焕, 徐程, 刘国成 2018 物理学报 67 183101
Google Scholar
Li Y S, Xie Y L, Huang T H, Xu C, Liu G C 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 183101
Google Scholar
[17] 吴永刚, 李世雄, 郝进欣, 徐梅, 孙光宇, 令狐荣锋 2015 物理学报 64 153102
Google Scholar
Wu Y G, Li S X, Hao J X, Xu M, Sun G Y, Linghu R F 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 153102
Google Scholar
[18] 李世雄, 张正平, 隆正文, 秦水介 2017 物理学报 66 103102
Google Scholar
Li S X, Zhang Z P, Long Z W, Qin S J 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 103102
Google Scholar
[19] Wu D L, Tan B, Wan H J, Xie A D, Ding D J 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 073101
Google Scholar
[20] Haynes W M 2014 CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Cleveland: CRC Press) p9
[21] Shimanouchi T 1977 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 6 993
Google Scholar
[22] McDaniel A H, Cantrell C A, Davidson J A, Shetter R E, Calvert J G 1991 J. Atmos. Chem. 12 211
Google Scholar
[23] Nanes R, Silvaggio P M, Boese R W 1980 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 23 211
Google Scholar
-
图 5 HOMO和LUMO能级随电场变化
Fig. 5. The HOMO and LUMO energy level variation with external electric field.
图 7 红外光谱随电场强度的变化 (a) –0.04 a.u.; (b) –0.03 a.u.; (c) –0.02 a.u.; (d) –0.01 a.u.; (e) a.u.; (f) 0.01 a.u.; (g) 0.02 a.u.; (h) 0.03 a.u.; (i) 0.04 a.u.
Fig. 7. Variation of the infrared intensities with external electric field: (a) –0.04 a.u.; (b) –0.03 a.u.; (c) –0.02 a.u.; (d) –0.01 a.u.; (e) 0 a.u.; (f) 0.01 a.u.; (h) 0.02 a.u.; (g) 0.03 a.u.; (i) 0.04 a.u..
图 8 红外谱线242.99 cm–1随电场的变化 (a)反向电场; (b)正向电场
Fig. 8. Variation of infrared spectrum of 242.99 cm–1 with external electric field: (a) Negative electric field; (b) positive electric field.
图 9 红外谱线802.40 cm–1随电场的变化 (a)反向电场; (b)正向电场
Fig. 9. Variation of infrared spectrum of 802.40 cm–1 with external electric field: (a) Negative electric field; (b) positive electric field.
图 10 拉曼光谱随电场强度的变化 (a) –0.04 a.u.; (b) –0.03 a.u.; (c) –0.02 a.u.; (d) –0.01 a.u.; (e) 0 a.u.; (f) 0.01 a.u.; (g) 0.02 a.u.; (h) 0.03 a.u.; (i) 0.04 a.u.
Fig. 10. Variation of Raman spectrum with external electric field: (a) –0.04 a.u.; (b) –0.03 a.u.; (c) –0.02 a.u.; (d) –0.01 a.u.; (e) 0 a.u.; (f) 0.01 a.u.; (h) 0.02 a.u.; (g) 0.03 a.u.; (i) 0.04 a.u..
图 11 拉曼谱394.42 cm–1随电场的变化 (a)反向电场; (b)正向电场
Fig. 11. Variation of Raman spectrum of 394.42 cm–1 with external electric field: (a) Negative electric field; (b) positive electric field.
图 12 拉曼谱802.40 cm–1随电场的变化 (a)反向电场; (b)正向电场
Fig. 12. Variation of Raman spectrum of 802.40 cm–1 with external electric field: (a) Negative electric field; (b) positive electric field.
图 13 反向电场下C—F键势能曲线
Fig. 13. Potential energy curve variation with negative electric field.
图 14 正向电场下C—F键势能曲线
Fig. 14. Potential energy curve variation with positive electric field.
表 1 不同电场下计算得到的CFC-11分子参数(1 hartree = 110.5 × 10–21 J)
Table 1. Calculated parameters of CFC-11 molecule under different external electric field.
F/a.u. Re(C—F)/Å Re(C—Cl)/nm E/hartree $\mu$/Debye –0.04 1.2764 1.8118 –1518.7025 5.0491 –0.03 1.2898 1.8010 –1518.6855 3.6168 –0.02 1.3043 1.7916 –1518.6740 2.2462 –0.01 1.3199 1.7830 –1518.6678 0.9145 0.00 1.3385 1.7757 –1518.6668 0.4044 0.01 1.3582 1.7692 –1518.6710 1.7191 0.02 1.3825 1.7628 –1518.6803 3.0657 0.03 1.4135 1.7563 –1518.6952 4.4805 0.04 1.4587 1.7486 –1518.7158 6.0486 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 无电场时CFC-11分子的红外谱实验值与计算值
Table 2. Experiment data and calculated data of infrared spectrum for CFC-11 molecule without external electric field.
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Stratford J 2002 Estimating CFC Releases from Cutting of Fridges (Scottish: Scottish Environment Protection Agency) p1
[2] Molina M J, Rowland F S 1974 Nature 249 810
Google Scholar
[3] Farman J C, Gardiner B G, Shanklin J D 1985 Nature 315 207
Google Scholar
[4] Vollmer M K, Young D, Trudinger C M, Mühle J, Henne S, Rigby M, Park S, Li S, Guillevic M, Mitrevski B, Harth C M, Miller B R, Reimann S, Yao B, Steele L P, Wyss S A, Lunder C R, Arduini J, McCulloch A, Wu S H, Rhee T S, Wang R H J, Salameh P K, Hermansen O, Hill M, Langenfelds R L, Ivy D, O’Doherty S, Krummel P B , Maione M, Etheridge D M, Zhou L X, Fraser P J, Prinn R G, Weiss R F, Simmonds P G 2018 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18 979
Google Scholar
[5] Schuck T J, Lefrancois F, Gallmann F, Wang D, Jesswein M, Hoker J, Bönisch H, Engel A 2018 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18 16553
Google Scholar
[6] LeedhamElvidge E, Bönisch H, Brenninkmeijer C A, Engel A, Fraser P J, Gallacher E, Langenfelds R, Mühle J, Oram D E, Ray E A, Ridley A R, Röckmann T, Sturges W T, Weiss R F, Laube J C 2018 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18 3369
Google Scholar
[7] Warner M J, Bullister J L, Wisegarver D P, Gammon R H, Weiss R F 1996 J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 101 20525
Google Scholar
[8] Willey D A, Fine R A, Sonnerup R E, Bullister J L, Smethie Jr W M, Warner M J 2004 Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 L01303
Google Scholar
[9] Font R, Fullana A, Caballero J A, Candela J, Garcıa A 2001 J. Anal. Appl. 58−59 63
Google Scholar
[10] Cullis C F, Hirschler M M 1981 The Combustion of Organic Polymers (London: Clarendon Press Oxford) p120
[11] Lattimer R P, Williams R C 2002 J. Anal. Appl. Pyroly. 63 85
Google Scholar
[12] 刘玉柱, 肖韶荣, 王俊锋, 何仲福, 邱学军, Gregor Knopp 2016 物理学报 65 113301
Google Scholar
Liu Y Z, Xiao S R Wang J F, He Z F, Qiu X J, Gregor K 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 113301
Google Scholar
[13] 侯健, 韩功元, 张振满, 潘循皙, 侯惠奇 1999 复旦学报 (自然科学版) 38 627
Hou J, Han G Y, Zhang Z M, Pan X X, Hou H Q 1999 J. Fudan Univ. (Natural Science)
38 627 [14] 谢安东, 谢晶, 周玲玲, 伍冬兰, 阮文, 罗文浪 2016 原子与分子物理学报 33 989
Xie A D, Xie J, Zhou L L, Wu D L, Ruan W, Luo W L 2016 Chin. J. Atom. Mol. Phys. 33 989
[15] 尹文怡, 刘玉柱, 林华, 李炳生, 秦朝朝 2018 光谱学与光谱分析 38 21
Yin W Y, Liu Y Z, Lin H, Li B S, Qin C C 2018 Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 38 21
[16] 李亚莎, 谢云龙, 黄太焕, 徐程, 刘国成 2018 物理学报 67 183101
Google Scholar
Li Y S, Xie Y L, Huang T H, Xu C, Liu G C 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 183101
Google Scholar
[17] 吴永刚, 李世雄, 郝进欣, 徐梅, 孙光宇, 令狐荣锋 2015 物理学报 64 153102
Google Scholar
Wu Y G, Li S X, Hao J X, Xu M, Sun G Y, Linghu R F 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 153102
Google Scholar
[18] 李世雄, 张正平, 隆正文, 秦水介 2017 物理学报 66 103102
Google Scholar
Li S X, Zhang Z P, Long Z W, Qin S J 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 103102
Google Scholar
[19] Wu D L, Tan B, Wan H J, Xie A D, Ding D J 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 073101
Google Scholar
[20] Haynes W M 2014 CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Cleveland: CRC Press) p9
[21] Shimanouchi T 1977 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 6 993
Google Scholar
[22] McDaniel A H, Cantrell C A, Davidson J A, Shetter R E, Calvert J G 1991 J. Atmos. Chem. 12 211
Google Scholar
[23] Nanes R, Silvaggio P M, Boese R W 1980 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 23 211
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 8628
- PDF下载量: 39
- 被引次数: 0
