-
提出一种基于夹层结构的偏振无关1×2定向耦合型解复用器, 用于分离1310 nm和1550 nm两个波长. 通过合理选择夹层结构芯区的折射率及波导间隙, 可以调节同一波长两个正交偏振模的耦合长度相等, 实现偏振无关; 通过合理选择夹层结构波导宽度, 可以使两个波长分别从不同输出波导端口输出, 实现解复用功能. 运用三维有限时域差分法进行建模仿真, 对结构参数进行优化, 并对器件性能进行了分析. 结果表明: 该器件定向耦合波导的长度为23 μm, 插入损耗低至0.1 dB, 输出波导间的串扰低至–26.23 dB, 3 dB带宽可达290 nm和200 nm. 另外, 本文提出的器件采用Si3N4/SiO2平台, 可有效减小波导尺寸, 提高集成度, 不仅实现了偏振无关, 而且结构紧凑、损耗低, 在未来的集成光路中具有潜在的应用价值.
-
关键词:
- 定向耦合 /
- Si3N4/SiO2平台 /
- 偏振无关 /
- 夹层结构
An ultra-compact 1×2 demultiplexer based on directional coupler (DC) waveguide is proposed to separate the 1310 nm wavelength from 1550 nm wavelength, in which a new Si3N4/SiNx/Si3N4 sandwiched structure is used to realize polarization insensitivity. Firstly, the new sandwiched structure is designed to be polarization-independent. The coupling lengths of two orthogonal polarization modes at the same wavelength versus the gap between two parallel SiNx waveguides g1 are calculated with several groups of structure parameters of the demultiplexer. The result shows that the coupling lengths for the two orthogonal polarization modes at the same wavelength can be identical by choosing the proper g1. Then, how to realize the function of wavelength separation is studied. When one wavelength propagates at even multiple of coupling length and the other wavelength propagates at odd multiple of coupling length, and vice versa, the two working wavelengths will output from different output ports, thereby the two wavelengths are successfully separated. Under the premise of satisfying such conditions, a comparison of size and performance among the devices with different groups of structure parameters is given to find the best one. The demultiplexer based on Si3N4/SiO2 platform has a compact structure, easy integration and good tolerance. Three-dimensional(3D) finite-difference time-domain method is used for simulation, and the results show that the length of the DC waveguide is only 23 μm; the insertion loss and crosstalk are as low as 0.1 dB and–26.23 dB respectively; a broad 3-dB bandwidth of 200 nm is achieved. To demonstrate the transmission characteristics of the demultiplexer, the evolution of the excited fundamental mode in the demultiplexer is also given. The novel demultiplexer is polarization-independent and can work at 1310 nm and 1550 nm wavelengths simultaneously. It has a potential application value in future integrated optical circuits.-
Keywords:
- directional coupler /
- Si3N4/SiO2 platform /
- polarization-insensitive /
- sandwiched structure
[1] Walker R G, Urquhart J, Bennion I, Carter A C 1990 IEE P-Optoelectron 137 33Google Scholar
[2] Zhang S, Ji W, Yin R, Li X, Gong Z, Lv L 2018 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 30 107Google Scholar
[3] Shih T T, Wu Y D, Lee J J 2009 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 21 18Google Scholar
[4] Hibino Y 2002 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 8 1090Google Scholar
[5] Song J H, Lim J H, Kim R K, ET AL 2005 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 17 2607Google Scholar
[6] Song J H, Kim K Y, Cho J, ET AL 2005 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 17 1668Google Scholar
[7] 刘耀东, 李志华, 余金中 2019 物理 48 82Google Scholar
Liu Y D, Li Z H, Yu J Z 2019 Physics 48 82Google Scholar
[8] Roeloffzen C G H, Hoekman M, Klein E J, ET AL 2018 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24 121
[9] Sacher W D, Huang Y, Liang D, ET AL 2014 Optical Fiber Communications Conference & Exhibition. IEEE, San Francisco, CA, USA, March 9–13, 2014 pTh1A.3
[10] Gupta R K, Chandran S, Krishna B 2018 3 rd International Conference on Microwave and Photonics, Dhanbad, India, February 9–11, 2018 p1
[11] Chen J Y, Shi Y C 2017 J. Lightwave Technol. 35 5260Google Scholar
[12] Xu H N, Shi Y C 2017 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29 1265Google Scholar
[13] Shi Y C, Anand S, He S L 2008 Asia Optical Fiber Communication & Optoelectronic Exposition & Conference, Shanghai, China, October 30–November 2, 2018 p1
[14] Chen J Y, Liu L, Shi Y C 2017 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29 1975Google Scholar
[15] Shi Y C, Anand S, He S L 2009 J. Lightwave Technol. 27 1443Google Scholar
[16] Hardy A, Streifer W 1985 J.Lightwave Technol. LT-3 1135
[17] Chen Y, Joines W T 2003 Opt. Commun. 228 319Google Scholar
[18] Fujisawa T, Koshiba M 2006 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 18 1246Google Scholar
[19] Chiang K S, Liu Q 2011 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 23 1277Google Scholar
[20] 汪静丽, 陈子玉, 陈鹤鸣 2020 物理学报 69 054206Google Scholar
Wang J L, Chen Z Y, Chen H M 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 054206Google Scholar
[21] Lee C C, Chen H L, Hsu J C, Tien C L 1999 Appl. Opt. 38 2078Google Scholar
[22] 邹祥云, 苑进社, 蒋一祥 2012 物理学报 61 148106Google Scholar
Zou X Y, Yuan J S, Jiang Y X 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 148106Google Scholar
[23] Wang Q, He S L 2003 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 5 449Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a) 夹层结构示意图; (b) TE偏振模在夹层波导中的场分布(n0 > n1); (c) TM偏振模在夹层波导中的场分布(n0 > n1)
Fig. 1. (a) schematic configuration of the sandwiched structure; (b) field distributions for the TE fundamental mode in a sandwiched waveguide (n0 > n1); (c) field distributions for the TM fundamental mode in a sandwiched waveguide(n0 > n1).
图 5 当 (a) W0 = 0.4 µm, W1 = 0.6 µm, (b) W0 = 0.4 µm, W1 = 0.7 µm, (c) W0 = 0.5 µm, W1 = 0.7 µm, (d) W0 = 0.5 µm, W1 = 0.8 µm时, ΔLc(λ)随g1的变化关系
Fig. 5. ΔLc(λ) as a function of g1 when (a) W0 = 0.4 µm, W1 = 0.6 µm, (b) W0 = 0.4 µm, W1 = 0.7 µm, (c) W0 = 0.5 µm, W1 = 0.7 µm, (d) W0 = 0.5 µm, W1 = 0.8 µm.
表 1 DC型偏振无关解复用器的结构参数
Table 1. Structural parameters of the polarization-insensitive DC demultiplexer.
结构参数 P g1/µm LDC/µm W0 = 0.4 µm, W1 = 0.6 µm 0 0.08 26.5 W0 = 0.4 µm, W1 = 0.7 µm 2 0.08 27 W0 = 0.4 µm, W1 = 0.8 µm 0 0.08 23 W0 = 0.5 µm, W1 = 0.7 µm 2 0.07 26 W0 = 0.5 µm, W1 = 0.8 µm 2 0.06 37 W0 = 0.5 µm, W1 = 0.9 µm 0 0.07 35 表 2 DC型偏振无关解复用器的透过率
Table 2. Transmittance of the polarization-insensitive DC demultiplexer.
结构参数 T(1310
nm, TE)T(1310
nm, TM)T(1550
nm, TE)T(1550
nm, TM)W0 = 0.4 µm, W1 = 0.6 µm 0.942 0.931 0.81 0.8 W0 = 0.4 µm, W1 = 0.7 µm 0.941 0.936 0.82 0.814 W0 = 0.4 µm, W1 = 0.8 µm 0.977 0.964 0.93 0.84 W0 = 0.5 µm, W1 = 0.7 µm 0.925 0.95 0.84 0.87 W0 = 0.5 µm, W1 = 0.8 µm 0.96 0.964 0.907 0.848 W0 = 0.5 µm, W1 = 0.9 µm 0.98 0.967 0.853 0.916 表 3 偏振无关1 × 2 DC解复用器的性能参数
Table 3. Performances of the polarization-insensitive DC demultiplexer.
性能参数 IL/dB CT/dB 1310 nm, TE 0.1 –20.92 1310 nm, TM 0.16 –21.62 1550 nm, TE 0.32 –26.23 1550 nm, TM 0.76 –24.2 -
[1] Walker R G, Urquhart J, Bennion I, Carter A C 1990 IEE P-Optoelectron 137 33Google Scholar
[2] Zhang S, Ji W, Yin R, Li X, Gong Z, Lv L 2018 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 30 107Google Scholar
[3] Shih T T, Wu Y D, Lee J J 2009 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 21 18Google Scholar
[4] Hibino Y 2002 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 8 1090Google Scholar
[5] Song J H, Lim J H, Kim R K, ET AL 2005 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 17 2607Google Scholar
[6] Song J H, Kim K Y, Cho J, ET AL 2005 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 17 1668Google Scholar
[7] 刘耀东, 李志华, 余金中 2019 物理 48 82Google Scholar
Liu Y D, Li Z H, Yu J Z 2019 Physics 48 82Google Scholar
[8] Roeloffzen C G H, Hoekman M, Klein E J, ET AL 2018 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24 121
[9] Sacher W D, Huang Y, Liang D, ET AL 2014 Optical Fiber Communications Conference & Exhibition. IEEE, San Francisco, CA, USA, March 9–13, 2014 pTh1A.3
[10] Gupta R K, Chandran S, Krishna B 2018 3 rd International Conference on Microwave and Photonics, Dhanbad, India, February 9–11, 2018 p1
[11] Chen J Y, Shi Y C 2017 J. Lightwave Technol. 35 5260Google Scholar
[12] Xu H N, Shi Y C 2017 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29 1265Google Scholar
[13] Shi Y C, Anand S, He S L 2008 Asia Optical Fiber Communication & Optoelectronic Exposition & Conference, Shanghai, China, October 30–November 2, 2018 p1
[14] Chen J Y, Liu L, Shi Y C 2017 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29 1975Google Scholar
[15] Shi Y C, Anand S, He S L 2009 J. Lightwave Technol. 27 1443Google Scholar
[16] Hardy A, Streifer W 1985 J.Lightwave Technol. LT-3 1135
[17] Chen Y, Joines W T 2003 Opt. Commun. 228 319Google Scholar
[18] Fujisawa T, Koshiba M 2006 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 18 1246Google Scholar
[19] Chiang K S, Liu Q 2011 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 23 1277Google Scholar
[20] 汪静丽, 陈子玉, 陈鹤鸣 2020 物理学报 69 054206Google Scholar
Wang J L, Chen Z Y, Chen H M 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 054206Google Scholar
[21] Lee C C, Chen H L, Hsu J C, Tien C L 1999 Appl. Opt. 38 2078Google Scholar
[22] 邹祥云, 苑进社, 蒋一祥 2012 物理学报 61 148106Google Scholar
Zou X Y, Yuan J S, Jiang Y X 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 148106Google Scholar
[23] Wang Q, He S L 2003 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 5 449Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 5644
- PDF下载量: 75
- 被引次数: 0