自旋轨道耦合量子点系统中的量子相干

王志梅; 王虹; 薛乃涛; 成高艳

doi:10.7498/aps.71.20212111

摘要

研究了自旋轨道耦合量子点中的量子相干效应. 运用输运电子的全计数统计方法计算系统的平均电流、散粒噪声和偏斜, 发现体系存在自旋轨道耦合作用时, 散粒噪声值随自旋轨道耦合常数的增加而减小. 更重要的是, 电流、噪声和偏斜随磁通周期性波动, 并且波动周期不受自旋轨道耦合强度大小、自旋极化率以及动力学耦合不对称的影响.

关键词:

In this paper, the quantum coherence effect in spin-orbit coupled quantum dots system is studied. The average current, shot noise and skewness of the system are calculated by using the full counting statistics approach of the transport system. It is found that the shot noise decreases with the spin-orbit coupling increasing. More importantly, the current, noise and skewness fluctuate periodically with the magnetic flux. And the oscillation period is not affected by the strength of spin-orbit coupling, spin polarization and dynamic coupling asymmetry.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
太原师范学院物理系, 晋中　030619

2.
太原师范学院, 计算物理与应用物理研究所, 晋中　030619

3.
华中科技大学, 武汉国家光电实验中心, 武汉　430074

通信作者: 王志梅, 120705547@qq.com

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11747057)和山西省高等学校科技创新项目(批准号: 2020L0526)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
Department of Physics, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong 030619, China

2.
Institute of Computational and Applied Physics, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong 030619, China

3.
Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Corresponding author: Wang Zhi-Mei, 120705547@qq.com

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11747057) and the Scientific and Technologial Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi Province, China (Grant No. 2020L0526).

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Lucignano P, Jouault B, Tagliacozzo A 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 4 Google Scholar
[2]	Kouwenhoven L P, Austing D G, Tarucha S 2001 Rep. Prog. Phys. 64 6 Google Scholar
[3]	Souza F M, Egues J C, Jauho A P 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 165303 Google Scholar
[4]	Świrkowicz R, Wilczyński M, Wawrzyniak M, Barnaś J 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 193312 Google Scholar
[5]	Martinek J, Sindel M, Borda L, Barnaś J, Bulla R, König J, Schön G, Maekawa S, von Delft J 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 121302(R)
[6]	Elste F, Timm C 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 235305 Google Scholar
[7]	Weymann I, Barnaś J, König J, Martinek J, Schön G 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 113301 Google Scholar
[8]	Cottet A, Belzig W, Bruder C 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 206801 Google Scholar
[9]	Datta S, Houten H V 1996 Phys. Today 49 5 Google Scholar
[10]	Nazarov Y V 1993 Physica B 189 57 Google Scholar
[11]	Gurvitz S A, Lipkin H J, Prager Y S 1996 Phys. Lett. A 212 91 Google Scholar
[12]	Gurvitz S A, Prager Y S 1996 Phys. Rev. B 53 15932 Google Scholar
[13]	Li X Q, Luo J Y, Yang Y G 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 205304 Google Scholar
[14]	Kampen N G V 1983 Phys. Today 36 278 Google Scholar
[15]	Fu B, Zhang L, Wei Y D, Wang J 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 115410 Google Scholar
[16]	Kilgour M, Agarwalla B K, Segal D 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 150 8 Google Scholar
[17]	Bagrets D A, Nazarov Y V 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 085316 Google Scholar
[18]	Luo J Y, Shen Y, He X L, Li X Q, Yan Y J 2011 Phys. Lett. A 376 59 Google Scholar
[19]	Levitov L S, Lesovik G B 1993 JETP Lett. 58 230 Google Scholar
[20]	Blanter Y M, Büttiker M 2000 Phys. Rep. 336 1 Google Scholar
[21]	Timofeev A V, Meschke M, Peltonen J T, Heikkila T T, Pekola J P 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 207001 Google Scholar
[22]	Sukhorukov E V, Jordan A N, Gustavsson S, Leturcq R, Ihn T, Ensslin K 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 243 Google Scholar
[23]	Gershon G, Bomze Y, Sukhorukov E V, Reznikov M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 016803 Google Scholar
[24]	Flindt C, Fricke C, Hohls F, Novotný T, Netočný K, Brandes T, Haug R J 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 10116 Google Scholar
[25]	Gabelli J, Reulet B 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 161203(R)
[26]	GustavssonS, Leturcq R, Studer M, Shorubalko I, Ihn T, Ensslin K, Driscoll D C, Gossard A C 2009 Surf. Sci. Rep. 64 191 Google Scholar
[27]	Masne Q L, Pothier H, Birge N O, Urbina C, Esteve D 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 067002 Google Scholar
[28]	Ubbelohde N, Fricke C, Flindt C, Hohls F, Haug R J 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 612 Google Scholar
[29]	Reulet B, Senzier J, Prober D E 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 196601 Google Scholar
[30]	Bomze Y, Gershon G, Shovkun D, Levitov L S, Reznikov M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 176601 Google Scholar
[31]	Gustavsson S, Leturcq R, Simovic B, Schleser R, Ihn T, Studerus P, Ensslin K, Driscoll D C, Gossard A C 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 076605 Google Scholar
[32]	Fujisawa T, Hayashi T, Tomita R, Hirayama Y 2006 Science 312 1634 Google Scholar
[33]	Maisi V F, Kambly D, Flindt C, Pekola J P 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 036801 Google Scholar
[34]	Braggio A, Köenig J, Fazio R 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 026805 Google Scholar
[35]	Muzykantskii B A, Khmelnitskii D E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 3982 Google Scholar
[36]	Belzig W, Nazarov Y V 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 067006 Google Scholar
[37]	Belzig W, Nazarov Y V 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 197006 Google Scholar
[38]	Shelankov A, Rammer J 2003 Europhys. Lett. 63 485 Google Scholar
[39]	Bulashenko O M 2005 J. Stat. Mech. 15 8 Google Scholar
[40]	Taddei F, Fazio R 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 075317 Google Scholar
[41]	Kindermann M 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 165332 Google Scholar
[42]	Ankerhold J, Grabert H 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 186601 Google Scholar
[43]	Tobiska J, Nazarov Y V 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 106801 Google Scholar
[44]	Stegmann P, König J, Weiss S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 035409 Google Scholar
[45]	Aharonov Y, Bohm D 1959 Phys. Rev. 115 485 Google Scholar
[46]	Aikawa H, Kobayashi K, Sano A, Katsumoto S, Iye Y 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 176802 Google Scholar
[47]	Xu G, Broholm C, Soh Y A, Aeppli G, Ditusa J F, Chen Y, Kenzelmann M, Frost C D, Ito T, Oka K 2007 Science 317 5841 Google Scholar
[48]	Xu W, Guo Y 2005 Phys. Lett. A 340 281 Google Scholar
[49]	Wolf S A, Awschalom D D, Buhrman R A, Daughton J M, Molnar S V, Roukes M L, Chtchelkanova A Y, Treger D M 2001 Science 294 1488 Google Scholar
[50]	Zutic I, Fabian J, Sarma S D 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 323 Google Scholar
[51]	Datta S, Das S 1990 Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 665 Google Scholar
[52]	Miller J B, Zumbühl D M, Marcus C M, Lyanda-Geller Y B, Gossard A C 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 076807 Google Scholar
[53]	Manchon A, Koo H C, Nitta J, Frolov S M, Duine R A 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 9 Google Scholar
[54]	Sheng L, Sheng D N, Ting C S 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 016602 Google Scholar
[55]	Ogloblya O V, Kuznetsova G M 2013 Physica B 424 47 Google Scholar
[56]	Chi F, Li S S 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 11 Google Scholar
[57]	Žutić I, Fabian J, Sarma S D 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 1558 Google Scholar
[58]	Schmidt G, Ferrand D, Molenkamp L W, Filip A T, Wees B J V 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 8 Google Scholar
[59]	Wu M W, Zhou J, Shi Q W 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 1012 Google Scholar
[60]	Ohe J I, Yamamoto M, Ohtsuki T, Nitta J 2004 Phys. Rev. B 72 041308 Google Scholar
[61]	Souma S, Nikolić B K 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 195346 Google Scholar
[62]	Sun Q F, Wang J, Guo H 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 165310 Google Scholar
[63]	Sun Q F, Xie X C 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 155321 Google Scholar
[64]	Belzig W 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 161301 Google Scholar
[65]	Streltsov A, Adesso G, Plenio M B 2017 Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 041003 Google Scholar
[66]	Hu M L, Hu X, Wang J, Yi P, Zhang Y R, Fan H 2018 Phys. Rep. 1 762 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 自旋轨道耦合常数${\alpha _{{\text{SO}}}}$不同时,　(a)平均电流$\left\langle I \right\rangle $, (b)散粒噪声${F_{\text{a}}}$和(c)偏斜${S_{\text{k}}}$随磁通$\zeta $振荡图. ${\varepsilon }_{1}=1, $$ {\varepsilon }_{2}=3, {\varGamma }_{\text{L}}={\varGamma }_{\text{R}}=0.01, p=0.1$

Fig. 1. (a) Average current$\left\langle I \right\rangle $, (b) shot noise${F_{\text{a}}}$and (c) skewness${S_{\text{k}}}$ fluctuation diagram in different spin-orbit coupling strength${\alpha _{{\text{SO}}}}$. ${\varepsilon }_{1}=1, {\varepsilon }_{2}=3, {\varGamma }_{\text{L}}={\varGamma }_{\text{R}}=0.01, $$ p=\mathrm{0.1}$

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 非对称动力耦合下,　(a)平均电流$\left\langle I \right\rangle $, (b)散粒噪声${F_{\text{a}}}$和(c)偏斜${S_{\text{k}}}$随磁通$\zeta $振荡图. ${\varepsilon }_{1}=1,\; {\varepsilon }_{2}=3, $$ \; {\alpha }_{\text{SO}}=0.3,\; p=0.1$

Fig. 2. (a) Average current$\left\langle I \right\rangle $, (b) shot noise${F_{\text{a}}}$ and (c) skewness ${S_{\text{k}}}$ fluctuation diagram for asymmetric dot-electrode coupling. ${\varepsilon }_{1}=1,\; {\varepsilon }_{2}=3,\; {\alpha }_{\text{SO}}=0.3,\; p=\mathrm{0.1}$

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 自旋极化率$p$不同时,　(a)平均电流$\left\langle I \right\rangle $, (b)散粒噪声${F_{\text{a}}}$和(c)偏斜${S_{\text{k}}}$随磁通$\zeta $振荡图. ${\varepsilon }_{1}=1, \;{\varepsilon }_{2}=3, $$ \;{\alpha }_{\text{SO}}=0.3,\; {\varGamma }_{\text{L}}={\varGamma }_{\text{R}}=0.01$

Fig. 3. (a) Average current$\left\langle I \right\rangle $, (b) shot noise${F_{\text{a}}}$ and (c) skewness${S_{\text{k}}}$ with magnetic flux oscillation with different spin polarization$p$.${\varepsilon }_{1}=1,\; {\varepsilon }_{2}=3,\; {\alpha }_{\text{SO}}=0.3,\; {\varGamma }_{\text{L}}={\varGamma }_{\text{R}}= $$ \mathrm{0.01}$

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

[1]	Lucignano P, Jouault B, Tagliacozzo A 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 4 Google Scholar
[2]	Kouwenhoven L P, Austing D G, Tarucha S 2001 Rep. Prog. Phys. 64 6 Google Scholar
[3]	Souza F M, Egues J C, Jauho A P 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 165303 Google Scholar
[4]	Świrkowicz R, Wilczyński M, Wawrzyniak M, Barnaś J 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 193312 Google Scholar
[5]	Martinek J, Sindel M, Borda L, Barnaś J, Bulla R, König J, Schön G, Maekawa S, von Delft J 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 121302(R)
[6]	Elste F, Timm C 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 235305 Google Scholar
[7]	Weymann I, Barnaś J, König J, Martinek J, Schön G 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 113301 Google Scholar
[8]	Cottet A, Belzig W, Bruder C 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 206801 Google Scholar
[9]	Datta S, Houten H V 1996 Phys. Today 49 5 Google Scholar
[10]	Nazarov Y V 1993 Physica B 189 57 Google Scholar
[11]	Gurvitz S A, Lipkin H J, Prager Y S 1996 Phys. Lett. A 212 91 Google Scholar
[12]	Gurvitz S A, Prager Y S 1996 Phys. Rev. B 53 15932 Google Scholar
[13]	Li X Q, Luo J Y, Yang Y G 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 205304 Google Scholar
[14]	Kampen N G V 1983 Phys. Today 36 278 Google Scholar
[15]	Fu B, Zhang L, Wei Y D, Wang J 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 115410 Google Scholar
[16]	Kilgour M, Agarwalla B K, Segal D 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 150 8 Google Scholar
[17]	Bagrets D A, Nazarov Y V 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 085316 Google Scholar
[18]	Luo J Y, Shen Y, He X L, Li X Q, Yan Y J 2011 Phys. Lett. A 376 59 Google Scholar
[19]	Levitov L S, Lesovik G B 1993 JETP Lett. 58 230 Google Scholar
[20]	Blanter Y M, Büttiker M 2000 Phys. Rep. 336 1 Google Scholar
[21]	Timofeev A V, Meschke M, Peltonen J T, Heikkila T T, Pekola J P 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 207001 Google Scholar
[22]	Sukhorukov E V, Jordan A N, Gustavsson S, Leturcq R, Ihn T, Ensslin K 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 243 Google Scholar
[23]	Gershon G, Bomze Y, Sukhorukov E V, Reznikov M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 016803 Google Scholar
[24]	Flindt C, Fricke C, Hohls F, Novotný T, Netočný K, Brandes T, Haug R J 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 10116 Google Scholar
[25]	Gabelli J, Reulet B 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 161203(R)
[26]	GustavssonS, Leturcq R, Studer M, Shorubalko I, Ihn T, Ensslin K, Driscoll D C, Gossard A C 2009 Surf. Sci. Rep. 64 191 Google Scholar
[27]	Masne Q L, Pothier H, Birge N O, Urbina C, Esteve D 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 067002 Google Scholar
[28]	Ubbelohde N, Fricke C, Flindt C, Hohls F, Haug R J 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 612 Google Scholar
[29]	Reulet B, Senzier J, Prober D E 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 196601 Google Scholar
[30]	Bomze Y, Gershon G, Shovkun D, Levitov L S, Reznikov M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 176601 Google Scholar
[31]	Gustavsson S, Leturcq R, Simovic B, Schleser R, Ihn T, Studerus P, Ensslin K, Driscoll D C, Gossard A C 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 076605 Google Scholar
[32]	Fujisawa T, Hayashi T, Tomita R, Hirayama Y 2006 Science 312 1634 Google Scholar
[33]	Maisi V F, Kambly D, Flindt C, Pekola J P 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 036801 Google Scholar
[34]	Braggio A, Köenig J, Fazio R 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 026805 Google Scholar
[35]	Muzykantskii B A, Khmelnitskii D E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 3982 Google Scholar
[36]	Belzig W, Nazarov Y V 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 067006 Google Scholar
[37]	Belzig W, Nazarov Y V 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 197006 Google Scholar
[38]	Shelankov A, Rammer J 2003 Europhys. Lett. 63 485 Google Scholar
[39]	Bulashenko O M 2005 J. Stat. Mech. 15 8 Google Scholar
[40]	Taddei F, Fazio R 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 075317 Google Scholar
[41]	Kindermann M 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 165332 Google Scholar
[42]	Ankerhold J, Grabert H 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 186601 Google Scholar
[43]	Tobiska J, Nazarov Y V 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 106801 Google Scholar
[44]	Stegmann P, König J, Weiss S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 035409 Google Scholar
[45]	Aharonov Y, Bohm D 1959 Phys. Rev. 115 485 Google Scholar
[46]	Aikawa H, Kobayashi K, Sano A, Katsumoto S, Iye Y 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 176802 Google Scholar
[47]	Xu G, Broholm C, Soh Y A, Aeppli G, Ditusa J F, Chen Y, Kenzelmann M, Frost C D, Ito T, Oka K 2007 Science 317 5841 Google Scholar
[48]	Xu W, Guo Y 2005 Phys. Lett. A 340 281 Google Scholar
[49]	Wolf S A, Awschalom D D, Buhrman R A, Daughton J M, Molnar S V, Roukes M L, Chtchelkanova A Y, Treger D M 2001 Science 294 1488 Google Scholar
[50]	Zutic I, Fabian J, Sarma S D 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 323 Google Scholar
[51]	Datta S, Das S 1990 Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 665 Google Scholar
[52]	Miller J B, Zumbühl D M, Marcus C M, Lyanda-Geller Y B, Gossard A C 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 076807 Google Scholar
[53]	Manchon A, Koo H C, Nitta J, Frolov S M, Duine R A 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 9 Google Scholar
[54]	Sheng L, Sheng D N, Ting C S 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 016602 Google Scholar
[55]	Ogloblya O V, Kuznetsova G M 2013 Physica B 424 47 Google Scholar
[56]	Chi F, Li S S 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 100 11 Google Scholar
[57]	Žutić I, Fabian J, Sarma S D 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 1558 Google Scholar
[58]	Schmidt G, Ferrand D, Molenkamp L W, Filip A T, Wees B J V 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 8 Google Scholar
[59]	Wu M W, Zhou J, Shi Q W 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 1012 Google Scholar
[60]	Ohe J I, Yamamoto M, Ohtsuki T, Nitta J 2004 Phys. Rev. B 72 041308 Google Scholar
[61]	Souma S, Nikolić B K 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 195346 Google Scholar
[62]	Sun Q F, Wang J, Guo H 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 165310 Google Scholar
[63]	Sun Q F, Xie X C 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 155321 Google Scholar
[64]	Belzig W 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 161301 Google Scholar
[65]	Streltsov A, Adesso G, Plenio M B 2017 Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 041003 Google Scholar
[66]	Hu M L, Hu X, Wang J, Yi P, Zhang Y R, Fan H 2018 Phys. Rep. 1 762 Google Scholar

[1]	薛文明, 李金, 何朝宇, 欧阳滔, 罗朝波, 唐超, 钟建新. H-Pb-Cl中可调控的巨型Rashba自旋劈裂和量子自旋霍尔效应. 物理学报, 2023, 72(5): 057101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221493
[2]	孙振辉, 胡丽贞, 徐玉良, 孔祥木. 准一维混合自旋(1/2, 5/2) Ising-XXZ模型的量子相干和互信息. 物理学报, 2023, 72(13): 130301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230381
[3]	薛海斌, 段志磊, 陈彬, 陈建宾, 邢丽丽. 自旋轨道耦合Su-Schrieffer-Heeger原子链系统的电子输运特性. 物理学报, 2021, 70(8): 087301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201742
[4]	施婷婷, 汪六九, 王璟琨, 张威. 自旋轨道耦合量子气体中的一些新进展. 物理学报, 2020, 69(1): 016701. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191241
[5]	李保民, 胡明亮, 范桁. 量子相干. 物理学报, 2019, 68(3): 030304. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181779
[6]	李志强, 王月明. 一维谐振子束缚的自旋轨道耦合玻色气体. 物理学报, 2019, 68(17): 173201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190143
[7]	梁滔, 李铭. 自旋轨道耦合系统中的整数量子霍尔效应. 物理学报, 2019, 68(11): 117101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190037
[8]	耿虎, 计青山, 张存喜, 王瑞. 缀饰格子中时间反演对称破缺的量子自旋霍尔效应. 物理学报, 2017, 66(12): 127303. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.127303
[9]	赵正印, 王红玲, 李明. Al0.6Ga0.4N/GaN/Al0.3Ga0.7N/Al0.6Ga0.4N量子阱中的Rashba自旋劈裂. 物理学报, 2016, 65(9): 097101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.097101
[10]	卢亚鑫, 马宁. 耦合电磁场对石墨烯量子磁振荡的影响. 物理学报, 2016, 65(2): 027502. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.027502
[11]	陈光平. 简谐+四次势中自旋轨道耦合旋转玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体的基态结构. 物理学报, 2015, 64(3): 030302. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.030302
[12]	龚士静, 段纯刚. 金属表面Rashba自旋轨道耦合作用研究进展. 物理学报, 2015, 64(18): 187103. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.187103
[13]	杨军, 章曦, 苗仁德. 自旋场效应晶体管中隧道磁阻的势垒相关反转效应. 物理学报, 2014, 63(21): 217202. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.217202
[14]	汤乃云. 耦合量子点中空穴基态反键态特性研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(5): 057301. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.057301
[15]	余志强, 谢泉, 肖清泉. 狭义相对论下电子自旋轨道耦合对X射线光谱的影响. 物理学报, 2010, 59(2): 925-931. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.925
[16]	张存喜, 王瑞, 孔令民. 太赫兹场辅助的单量子阱自旋共振输运. 物理学报, 2010, 59(7): 4980-4984. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4980
[17]	施振刚, 文伟, 谌雄文, 向少华, 宋克慧. 双量子点电荷比特的散粒噪声谱. 物理学报, 2010, 59(5): 2971-2975. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2971
[18]	肖贤波, 李小毛, 陈宇光. 含stubs量子波导系统的电子自旋极化输运性质. 物理学报, 2009, 58(11): 7909-7913. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.7909
[19]	杨军, 武文远, 龚艳春. 磁性隧道结中的量子相干输运研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(1): 448-452. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.448
[20]	胡振华, 黄德修. 非对称耦合量子阱吸收与色散的理论研究. 物理学报, 2005, 54(4): 1788-1793. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1788

计量

文章访问数: 4109
PDF下载量: 94
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

自旋轨道耦合量子点系统中的量子相干