搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

二维对六苯分子团簇中相干激发能量转移过程研究

方德音 范旭阳 卫岸 王鹿霞

引用本文:
Citation:

二维对六苯分子团簇中相干激发能量转移过程研究

方德音, 范旭阳, 卫岸, 王鹿霞

Coherent excitation energy transfer processes in two-dimensional para-sexiphenyl molecular clusters

Fang De-Yin, Fan Xu-Yang, Wei An, Wang Lu-Xia
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 激发能量转移是影响对六苯相关器件应用的重要因素之一, 研究对六苯团簇在不同外场激发作用下的激子动力学过程及激子相干效应, 这对于提高由对六苯及其相关衍生物所组成的分子器件的应用性能具有重要意义. 本文基于密度矩阵理论, 采用算符的数学平均值近似, 应用不同脉冲场激发盘状对六苯分子团簇, 对其激子动力学过程及激子相干行为进行了分析. 研究发现, 当处于强场短脉冲激发时, 团簇内产生多激子效应, 激子能级出现新的杂化态. 在短脉冲激发下, 在不同能量区域激发态分布不同, 但均表现出明显对称性. 由于H型团簇最高能级的激子态被优先激发, 发现随脉冲场增大, 激子相干增强, 当脉冲场较大时, 在脉冲激发过程中, 激子振荡协同性消失, 极短时间内大量分子产生激子相干, 出现瞬态离域现象.
    Excitation energy transfer is one of the most important factors affecting the applications of para-sexiphenyl devices. The study of exciton dynamics and exciton coherence effect of para-sexiphenyl clusters under external field excitation is important in order to improve the performance of molecular devices composed of para-sexiphenyl and its related derivatives. In this work, the two-dimensional disc-like para-sexiphenyl molecular cluster is used as the object of study. The molecular system is simplified into a two-level model based on its structural features and energy level distribution. Within the framework of density matrix theory, the exciton dynamics and exciton coherence behavior of disk-like para-hexaphene molecular clusters excited by different pulse fields are analyzed through using the mathematical mean value approximation of the operator. The results show that when long pulses are used to excite para-sexiphenyl clusters, the single exciton state characteristic appears and is insensitive to the change of excited external field strength. When the clusters are subjected to strong pulsed fields with short pulse widths, multiple excitons are excited simultaneously in the cluster, forming multiple exciton states, with the exciton energy levels shifting toward lower energy and new hybrid states appearing. In the optical response spectrum, there appear multiple resonance peaks. And as the pulse field is enhanced, the multi-exciton effect becomes apparent and the hybridization energy level increases. Under short pulse excitation, the excited states are distributed differently in different energy regions, but all of them show obvious symmetry. As the highest-energy exciton states of H-type clusters are preferentially excited, we analyze the exciton state population and the exciton coherence evolution with time in the high-energy exciton state. With the pulse field increases, Rabi oscillations appear and the exciton coherence effect increases. When the pulsed field reaches a certain field strength, the exciton oscillation cooperativity disappears in the first 100 fs, showing the non-local characteristic. The position of the wave trough of the exciton state population corresponds to the peak in the exciton coherence size. It indicates that when the pulse field is intense enough, a large number of molecules are in the exciton coherent state during the pulsed excitation, and transient out-of-domain phenomena occur.
      通信作者: 王鹿霞, luxiawang@sas.ustb.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 21961132023, 11774026)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Wang Lu-Xia, luxiawang@sas.ustb.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21961132023, 11774026).
    [1]

    O’ Carroll D M, Petoukhoff C E, Kohl J, Yu B X, Carter C M, Goodman S 2013 Polym. Chem. 4 5181Google Scholar

    [2]

    Reineke S, Thomschke M, Lussem B, Leo K 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 1245Google Scholar

    [3]

    Zhang C X, Liu R G, Mak C H, Zou X L, Shen H H, Leu S Y, Ji L, Hsu H Y 2018 J. Photonics Energy 8 021001Google Scholar

    [4]

    Spano F C, Silva C 2014 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65 477Google Scholar

    [5]

    Brixner T, Hildner R, Kohler J, Lambert C, Wurthner F 2017 Adv. Energy Mater. 7 1700236Google Scholar

    [6]

    Tamai Y, Ohkita H, Benten H, Ito S 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 3417Google Scholar

    [7]

    Resel R 2003 Thin Solid Films 433 1Google Scholar

    [8]

    Zojer E, Koch N, Puschnig P, Meghdadi F, Niko A, Resel R, Ambrosch-Draxl C, Knupfer M, Fink J, Bredas J L, Leising G 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 16538Google Scholar

    [9]

    Palczynski K, Heimel G, Heyda J, Dzubiella J 2014 Cryst. Growth Des. 14 3791Google Scholar

    [10]

    Choi A, Kwon Y N, Chung J W, Yun Y, Park J I, Lee Y U 2020 AIP Adv. 10 025127Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zhang Y, Wei X C, Zhang H, Chen X, Wang J 2018 Appl. Surf. Sci. 427 452Google Scholar

    [12]

    Li Y, Wang H, Zhang X H, Zhang Q, Wang X S, Cao D F, Shi Z S, Yan D H, Cui Z C 2016 RSC Adv. 6 5377Google Scholar

    [13]

    Katiyar S, Verma N, Jogi J 2022 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 37 025008Google Scholar

    [14]

    Yang X X, Feng X, Xin J H, Zhang P L, Wang H B, Yan D H 2018 J. Mater. Chem. C 6 8879Google Scholar

    [15]

    Usluer O, Demic S , Kus M, Ozel F, Sariciftci N S 2014 J. Lumines. 146 6Google Scholar

    [16]

    Simbrunner C, Hernandez-Sosa G, Baumgartner E, Hesser G, Roither J, Heiss W, Sitter H 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 073505Google Scholar

    [17]

    Jiang X X, Dai J G, Wang H B, Geng Y H, Yan D H 2007 Chem. Phys. Lett. 446 329Google Scholar

    [18]

    Winder C, Andreev A, Sitter H, Matt G, Sariciftci N S, Meissner D 2003 Synth. Met. 139 573Google Scholar

    [19]

    Qian C, Sun J, Kong L A, Gou G Y, Zhu M L, Yuan Y B, Huang H, Gao Y L, Yang J L 2017 Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 1604933Google Scholar

    [20]

    Simbrunner C 2013 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 28 053001Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wang L, Plehn T, May V 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 075401Google Scholar

    [22]

    Lee J, Zhang Q, Park S, Choe A, Fan Z, Ko H 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 634Google Scholar

    [23]

    Li G C, Zhang Q, Maier S A, Lei D 2018 Nanophotonics 7 1865Google Scholar

    [24]

    Fernandes J D, Pazin W M, Aroca R F, Macedo W D J, Teixeira S R, Constantino C J L 2019 Spectroc. Acta A 211 221Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang Y, Meng Q S, Zhang L, Luo Y, Yu Y J, Yang B, Zhang Y, Esteban R, Aizpurua J, Luo Y, Yang J L, Dong Z C, Hou J G 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15225Google Scholar

    [26]

    Han X B, Li F, He Z C, Liu Y H, Hu H T, Wang K, Lu P X 2022 Nanophotonics 11 603Google Scholar

    [27]

    Kramer S N, Brown J, Rice M, Peteanu L A 2021 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 5919Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wang L, May V 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 195413Google Scholar

    [29]

    Wang L, May V 2018 J. Phys. B 51 064002Google Scholar

    [30]

    Kasha M 1963 Radiat. Res. 20 55Google Scholar

    [31]

    Chakraborty S, Debnath P, Dey D, Bhattacharjee D, Hussain S A 2014 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 293 57Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wu F P, Lu Y X, Mu X L E, Chen Z T, Liu S S, Zhou X F, Liu S F, Li Z B 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 32388Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhao X J, Zhao H J, Wang S, Fan Z W, Ma Y, Yin Y M, Wang W, Xi R M, Meng M 2021 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 20828Google Scholar

    [34]

    Gomez-Sosa G, Beristain M F, Ortega A, Martínez-Viramontes J, Ogawa T, Fernández-Hernández R C, Tamayo-Rivera L, Reyes-Esqueda J A, Isoshima T, Hara M 2012 Opt. Mater. 34 856Google Scholar

    [35]

    Plehn T, Ziemann D, May V 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 26870Google Scholar

    [36]

    Plehn T, Ziemann D, May V 2019 J. Phys. Chem. C 122 27925Google Scholar

    [37]

    May V 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 140 054103Google Scholar

    [38]

    Hader K, Consani C, Brixner T, Engel V 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 31989Google Scholar

    [39]

    Zheng F L, Chen L P, Gao J B, Zhao Y 2021 Materials 14 3291Google Scholar

    [40]

    Fassioli F, Dinshaw R, Arpin P C, Scholes G D 2014 J. R. Soc. Interface 11 20130901Google Scholar

  • 图 1  二维对六苯团簇结构图 (a) 俯视图; (b) 沿x轴侧视图; (c) 沿y轴侧视图

    Fig. 1.  Structure of the two-dimensional 6P clusters: (a) Top view; (b) side view along x axis; (c) side view along y axis.

    图 2  二维对六苯团簇静电位移示意图 (a) 分子激发能的相对静电位移; (b) 分子激发能无(红色)及有(蓝色)静电位移时的Frenkel激子能带[21]

    Fig. 2.  Schematic diagram of the electrostatic displacement of two-dimensional 6P clusters: (a) Relative electrostatic shift of the molecular excitation energies; (b) Frenkel exciton energy band without (red) and with (blue) electrostatic shift of the molecular excitation energies[21].

    图 3  $\kappa = 2 \times {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$时, 团簇内激发态布居$ P_{{\text{tot}}}^{\left( {{\text{ss}}} \right)} $随激光$\hbar {\omega _0}$、脉冲宽度${\tau _{\text{p}}}$变化 (a) 弱场${a_{\text{p}}}=5 \times {10^5}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$; (b) 强场${a_{\text{p}}}{\text{ = 2}}.5 \times {10^6}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$

    Fig. 3.  Excited-state populations $ P_{{\text{tot}}}^{\left( {{\text{ss}}} \right)} $ in clusters vary with photon energy $\hbar {\omega _0}$ of the laser and pulse length ${\tau _{\text{p}}}$ at $\kappa = 2 \;\times $$ {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$: (a) In weak fields ${a_{\text{p}}}=5 \times {10^5}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$; (b) in strong fields $ a_{\text{p}}\text{ = 2}.5\times10^{6}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}} $.

    图 4  $\kappa = 2 \times {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$时, 在长脉冲场 (a) ${\tau _{\text{p}}}=1{\text{ ps}}$和短脉冲场(b) ${\tau _{\text{p}}}=50{\text{ fs}}$下, 团簇内激发态布居$ P_{{\text{tot}}}^{\left( {{\text{ss}}} \right)} $随激光$\hbar {\omega _0}$、脉冲能量${a_{\text{p}}}$变化

    Fig. 4.  Excited-state populations $ P_{{\text{tot}}}^{\left( {{\text{ss}}} \right)} $ in clusters in long ${\tau _{\text{p}}}=1{\text{ ps}}$ (a) and short ${\tau _{\text{p}}}=50{\text{ fs}}$ (b) pulsed fields vary with photon energy $\hbar {\omega _0}$ of the laser and pulse energy ${a_{\text{p}}}$, $\kappa = 2 \times {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$.

    图 5  $\hbar {\omega _0} = 4.2483{\text{ eV}}$, $\kappa = 2 \times {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$时, 弱场短脉冲作用下(${a_{\text{p}}} = 5 \times {10^5}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$, ${\tau _{\text{p}}} = 50~{\text{fs}}$), 4个不同时刻的分子激发态布居$ {P_m} $ (a) $t = 100{\text{ fs}}$; (b) $t = 200{\text{ fs}}$; (c) $t = 500{\text{ fs}}$; (d) $t = 1{\text{ ps}}$

    Fig. 5.  Molecular excited state populations $ {P_m} $ at four different moments in the weak field with short pulses (${a_{\text{p}}} = $$ 5 \times {10^5}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$, ${\tau _{\text{p}}} = 50{\text{ fs}}$), $\hbar {\omega _0} = 4.2483{\text{ eV}}$, $\kappa = 2 \times $$ {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$: (a) $t = 100{\text{ fs}}$; (b) $t = 200{\text{ fs}}$; (c) $t = 500{\text{ fs}}$; (d) $t = 1{\text{ ps}}$.

    图 6  $\hbar {\omega _0} = 4.9243{\text{ eV}}$, $\kappa = 2 \times {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$时, 弱场短脉冲作用下(${a_{\text{p}}} = 5 \times {10^5}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$, ${\tau _{\text{p}}}{=}50{\text{ fs}}$), 4个不同时刻的分子激发态布居$ {P_m} $ (a) $t = 100{\text{ fs}}$; (b) $t = 200{\text{ fs}}$; (c) $t = 500{\text{ fs}}$; (d) $t = 1{\text{ ps}}$

    Fig. 6.  Molecular excited state populations $ {P_m} $at four different moments in the weak field with short pulses (${a_{\text{p}}} = $$ 5 \times {10^5}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$, ${\tau _{\text{p}}}{=}50{\text{ fs}}$), $\hbar {\omega _0} = 4.9243{\text{ eV}}$, $\kappa = 2 \times $$ {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$: (a) $t = 100{\text{ fs}}$; (b) $t = 200{\text{ fs}}$; (c) $t = 500{\text{ fs}}$; (d) $t = 1{\text{ ps}}$.

    图 7  二维对六苯团簇选取分子示意图

    Fig. 7.  Schematic diagram of selected molecules in two-dimensional 6P clusters clusters.

    图 8  $\kappa = 2 \times {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$时, 短脉冲(${\tau _{\text{p}}} = 50{\text{ fs}}$, $\hbar {\omega _0} = 4.9243{\text{ eV}}$)场下, 分子激发态布居$ {P_m} $随时间的演变 (a) ${a_{\text{p}}} = 5 \times $$ {10^5}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$; (b) $ {a_{\text{p}}} = {10^6}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}} $; (c) ${a_{\text{p}}} = 2.5 \times {10^6}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$; (d) ${a_{\text{p}}} = 5 \times {10^6}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$

    Fig. 8.  Molecular excited state populations $ {P_m} $ in short pulsed fields (${\tau _{\text{p}}} = 50{\text{ fs}}$, $\hbar {\omega _0} = 4.9243{\text{ eV}}$) vary with time, $\kappa = 2 \times $$ {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$: (a) ${a_{\text{p}}} = 5 \times {10^5}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$; (b) $ {a_{\text{p}}} = {10^6}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$; (c) ${a_{\text{p}}} = 2.5 \times {10^6}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$; (d) ${a_{\text{p}}} = 5 \times {10^6}{\text{ ps}} {\cdot} {\rm{V{\cdot}m^{-1}}}$.

    图 9  $\kappa = 2 \times {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$, 短脉冲(${\tau _{\text{p}}} = 50{\text{ fs}}$, $\hbar {\omega _0} = $$ 4.9243{\text{ eV}}$)场下, 激子相干尺寸$ {L_\rho } $随时间的演变

    Fig. 9.  Exciton coherence size $ {L_\rho } $ in short pulsed fields (${\tau _{\text{p}}} = $$ 50{\text{ fs}}$, $\hbar {\omega _0} = 4.9243{\text{ eV}}$) vary with time at $\kappa = 2 \times $$ {10^{11}}{\text{ }}{{\text{s}}^{{{ - 1}}}}$.

    表 1  参数设置

    Table 1.  Parameters used.

    名称/单位数值
    分子数${N_{{\text{mol}}}}$59
    分子本征态能量$ {E_{{\text{mol}}}} $/eV4.02
    分子偶极矩$ {d_{{\text{mol}}}} $/D12.4
    分子间激发能量转移速率$\kappa $/(1011 s–1)2
    脉冲场频率${\omega _0}$随${E_0}/\hbar $变化
    脉冲场强度${E_0}$/(V·m–1)105—108
    脉冲宽度${\tau _{\text{p}}}$/fs20—1000
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    O’ Carroll D M, Petoukhoff C E, Kohl J, Yu B X, Carter C M, Goodman S 2013 Polym. Chem. 4 5181Google Scholar

    [2]

    Reineke S, Thomschke M, Lussem B, Leo K 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 1245Google Scholar

    [3]

    Zhang C X, Liu R G, Mak C H, Zou X L, Shen H H, Leu S Y, Ji L, Hsu H Y 2018 J. Photonics Energy 8 021001Google Scholar

    [4]

    Spano F C, Silva C 2014 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65 477Google Scholar

    [5]

    Brixner T, Hildner R, Kohler J, Lambert C, Wurthner F 2017 Adv. Energy Mater. 7 1700236Google Scholar

    [6]

    Tamai Y, Ohkita H, Benten H, Ito S 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 3417Google Scholar

    [7]

    Resel R 2003 Thin Solid Films 433 1Google Scholar

    [8]

    Zojer E, Koch N, Puschnig P, Meghdadi F, Niko A, Resel R, Ambrosch-Draxl C, Knupfer M, Fink J, Bredas J L, Leising G 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 16538Google Scholar

    [9]

    Palczynski K, Heimel G, Heyda J, Dzubiella J 2014 Cryst. Growth Des. 14 3791Google Scholar

    [10]

    Choi A, Kwon Y N, Chung J W, Yun Y, Park J I, Lee Y U 2020 AIP Adv. 10 025127Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zhang Y, Wei X C, Zhang H, Chen X, Wang J 2018 Appl. Surf. Sci. 427 452Google Scholar

    [12]

    Li Y, Wang H, Zhang X H, Zhang Q, Wang X S, Cao D F, Shi Z S, Yan D H, Cui Z C 2016 RSC Adv. 6 5377Google Scholar

    [13]

    Katiyar S, Verma N, Jogi J 2022 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 37 025008Google Scholar

    [14]

    Yang X X, Feng X, Xin J H, Zhang P L, Wang H B, Yan D H 2018 J. Mater. Chem. C 6 8879Google Scholar

    [15]

    Usluer O, Demic S , Kus M, Ozel F, Sariciftci N S 2014 J. Lumines. 146 6Google Scholar

    [16]

    Simbrunner C, Hernandez-Sosa G, Baumgartner E, Hesser G, Roither J, Heiss W, Sitter H 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 073505Google Scholar

    [17]

    Jiang X X, Dai J G, Wang H B, Geng Y H, Yan D H 2007 Chem. Phys. Lett. 446 329Google Scholar

    [18]

    Winder C, Andreev A, Sitter H, Matt G, Sariciftci N S, Meissner D 2003 Synth. Met. 139 573Google Scholar

    [19]

    Qian C, Sun J, Kong L A, Gou G Y, Zhu M L, Yuan Y B, Huang H, Gao Y L, Yang J L 2017 Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 1604933Google Scholar

    [20]

    Simbrunner C 2013 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 28 053001Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wang L, Plehn T, May V 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 075401Google Scholar

    [22]

    Lee J, Zhang Q, Park S, Choe A, Fan Z, Ko H 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 634Google Scholar

    [23]

    Li G C, Zhang Q, Maier S A, Lei D 2018 Nanophotonics 7 1865Google Scholar

    [24]

    Fernandes J D, Pazin W M, Aroca R F, Macedo W D J, Teixeira S R, Constantino C J L 2019 Spectroc. Acta A 211 221Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang Y, Meng Q S, Zhang L, Luo Y, Yu Y J, Yang B, Zhang Y, Esteban R, Aizpurua J, Luo Y, Yang J L, Dong Z C, Hou J G 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15225Google Scholar

    [26]

    Han X B, Li F, He Z C, Liu Y H, Hu H T, Wang K, Lu P X 2022 Nanophotonics 11 603Google Scholar

    [27]

    Kramer S N, Brown J, Rice M, Peteanu L A 2021 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 5919Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wang L, May V 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 195413Google Scholar

    [29]

    Wang L, May V 2018 J. Phys. B 51 064002Google Scholar

    [30]

    Kasha M 1963 Radiat. Res. 20 55Google Scholar

    [31]

    Chakraborty S, Debnath P, Dey D, Bhattacharjee D, Hussain S A 2014 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 293 57Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wu F P, Lu Y X, Mu X L E, Chen Z T, Liu S S, Zhou X F, Liu S F, Li Z B 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 32388Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhao X J, Zhao H J, Wang S, Fan Z W, Ma Y, Yin Y M, Wang W, Xi R M, Meng M 2021 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 20828Google Scholar

    [34]

    Gomez-Sosa G, Beristain M F, Ortega A, Martínez-Viramontes J, Ogawa T, Fernández-Hernández R C, Tamayo-Rivera L, Reyes-Esqueda J A, Isoshima T, Hara M 2012 Opt. Mater. 34 856Google Scholar

    [35]

    Plehn T, Ziemann D, May V 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 26870Google Scholar

    [36]

    Plehn T, Ziemann D, May V 2019 J. Phys. Chem. C 122 27925Google Scholar

    [37]

    May V 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 140 054103Google Scholar

    [38]

    Hader K, Consani C, Brixner T, Engel V 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 31989Google Scholar

    [39]

    Zheng F L, Chen L P, Gao J B, Zhao Y 2021 Materials 14 3291Google Scholar

    [40]

    Fassioli F, Dinshaw R, Arpin P C, Scholes G D 2014 J. R. Soc. Interface 11 20130901Google Scholar

  • [1] 符晓倩, 吕思远, 王鹿霞. 双分子链中非线性多激子态的动力学研究. 物理学报, 2020, 69(19): 197301. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200104
    [2] 秦朝朝, 崔明焕, 宋迪迪, 何伟. CdSeS合金结构量子点的多激子俄歇复合过程. 物理学报, 2019, 68(10): 107801. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190291
    [3] 刘长菊, 卢敏, 苏未安, 董太源, 沈文忠. 纳米半导体中多重激子效应研究进展. 物理学报, 2018, 67(2): 027302. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171917
    [4] 李牧野, 李芳, 魏来, 何志聪, 张俊佩, 韩俊波, 陆培祥. CdTe量子点与罗丹明B水溶液体系下的双光子激发荧光共振能量转移. 物理学报, 2015, 64(10): 108201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.108201
    [5] 何月娣, 徐征, 赵谡玲, 刘志民, 高松, 徐叙瑢. 混合量子点器件电致发光的能量转移研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(17): 177301. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.177301
    [6] 曾宽宏, 王登龙, 佘彦超, 张蔚曦. 计及激子-双激子相干下半导体单量子点中的空间光孤子对. 物理学报, 2013, 62(14): 147801. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.147801
    [7] 沈曼, 张亮, 刘建军. 磁场和量子点尺寸对激子性质的影响. 物理学报, 2012, 61(21): 217103. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.217103
    [8] 宫明艳. He原子和BH分子碰撞体系的转动激发能量转移. 物理学报, 2011, 60(7): 073401. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.073401
    [9] 罗质华, 余超凡. 一维分子晶体激子-孤子运动的激子运动学和动力学非线性效应. 物理学报, 2008, 57(6): 3720-3729. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3720
    [10] 刘云飞, 肖景林. LA声子对激子qubit纯退相干的影响. 物理学报, 2008, 57(6): 3324-3327. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3324
    [11] 宋淑芳, 赵德威, 徐 征, 徐叙瑢. 有机多层量子阱的能量转移. 物理学报, 2007, 56(6): 3499-3503. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3499
    [12] 熊 稳, 赵 铧. ZnO薄膜的激子能量和束缚能的计算. 物理学报, 2007, 56(2): 1061-1065. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1061
    [13] 史庆藩, 闫学群. 非线性激发的磁激子对的振荡特性. 物理学报, 2003, 52(1): 225-228. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.225
    [14] 王 谨, 胡正发, 张登玉, 詹明生. Rb原子激发态碰撞能量转移. 物理学报, 1998, 47(8): 1265-1271. doi: 10.7498/aps.47.1265
    [15] 潘多海, 马永红. 表面增强的分子间能量转移效应的机理研究. 物理学报, 1995, 44(12): 1914-1920. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1914
    [16] 沈异凡, 李万兴. 激发态铯原子间的碰撞能量转移. 物理学报, 1993, 42(11): 1766-1773. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.1766
    [17] 杨立书, 汪正民, 吴传秀, 刘宗才, 葛礼和. 氟里昂113在多频强红外场离解过程中的V-V能量转移. 物理学报, 1987, 36(2): 259-263. doi: 10.7498/aps.36.259
    [18] 郑杭, 方俊鑫. 碱卤晶体中的电荷转移型激子. 物理学报, 1986, 35(8): 1019-1028. doi: 10.7498/aps.35.1019
    [19] 贾惟义, 严懋勋. 准一维反铁磁体CsMnCl3·2D2O中激子的能量转移. 物理学报, 1983, 32(7): 867-874. doi: 10.7498/aps.32.867
    [20] 张华. 正烷属烃分子的激发理论与能量转移问题. 物理学报, 1964, 20(5): 436-443. doi: 10.7498/aps.20.436
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2923
  • PDF下载量:  59
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-04-10
  • 修回日期:  2023-07-28
  • 上网日期:  2023-08-02
  • 刊出日期:  2023-10-05

/

返回文章
返回