搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于光束偏移器的光的轨道角动量分束器

张卓 张景风 孔令军

引用本文:
Citation:

基于光束偏移器的光的轨道角动量分束器

张卓, 张景风, 孔令军

Orbital angular momentum splitter of light based on beam displacer

Zhang Zhuo, Zhang Jing-Feng, Kong Ling-Jun
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 近年来, 光的轨道角动量自由度的高维度特性引起了广泛的关注. 该自由度在许多科学领域得到了研究和应用, 特别是在光通讯和量子信息领域. 为了充分利用轨道角动量的高维特性, 不同的轨道角动量态的非破坏分离成为一个最基本的要求. 然而, 目前已有的轨道角动量分束系统, 要么在稳定性和级联拓展性方面有所不足; 要么分离后的轨道角动量态的特性遭到严重破坏, 无法参与进一步的相互作用过程. 本文基于光束偏移器构建微型Mach-Zehnder干涉仪, 设计了一个稳定且紧凑的轨道角动量分束器, 实现了轨道角动量模式的非破坏分束. 设计中由于只存在光束的全反射, 因此理论上能量损耗为零. 在微型Mach-Zehnder干涉仪中的光束经过的光学元件相同, 且光束的空间偏移量较小, 所以该轨道角动量分束器具有很好的稳定性. 此外, 由于被分开的轨道角动量态与入射的轨道角动量态具有相同的传播方向, 因此该分束器具有很好的可拓展性, 便于级联使用. 本研究对轨道角动量这一高维自由度在光通讯等相关领域的应用有重要意义.
    In recent years, the high-dimensional properties of the orbital angular momentum degree of freedom of light have attracted extensive attention. This degree of freedom has been studied and used in many scientific fields, especially in optical communication and quantum information. In order to fully utilize the high-dimensional properties of orbital angular momentum, non-destructive separation of different orbital angular momentum states has become a fundamental requirement. However, the existing orbital angular momentum beam-splitting systems either lack stability and cascade expansibility, or the properties of the separated orbital angular momentum states are seriously damaged, thus failing to participate in further interaction processes. In this work, we construct a miniature Mach-Zehnder interferometer based on the beam displacer, and design an orbital angular momentum beam splitter, thereby realizing the non-destructive beam splitting of orbital angular momentum mode. In the orbital angular momentum splitter, the theoretical energy loss is zero because there exists only total reflection of the beam. The beam in the miniature Mach-Zehnder interferometer passes through the same optical element, and the spatial deviation of the beam is small, so the orbital angular momentum beam splitter has good stability. In addition, because the separated orbital angular momentum state has the same propagation direction as the incident orbital angular momentum state, the beam splitter has good extensibility and is easy to use in cascade. Our research result is of great significance in using the orbital angular momentum as a high-dimensional degree of freedom in optical communication and other related fields.
      通信作者: 孔令军, konglj@bit.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 12004038)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Kong Ling-Jun, konglj@bit.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12004038).
    [1]

    Coullet P, Gil L, Rocca F 1989 Opt. Commun. 73 403Google Scholar

    [2]

    Allen L, Beijersbergen M W, Spreeuw R J C, Woerdman J P 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 8185Google Scholar

    [3]

    Li S M, Kong L J, Ren Z C, Li Y, Tu C, Wang H T 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 035801Google Scholar

    [4]

    Neshev D N, Alexander T J, Ostrovskaya E A, Kivshar Y S, Martin H, Makasyuk I, Chen Z 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 123903Google Scholar

    [5]

    Swartzlander G A, Law C T 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2503Google Scholar

    [6]

    Tikhonenko V, Christou J, Luther-Daves B 1995 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12 2046Google Scholar

    [7]

    Firth W J, Skryabin D V 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 2450Google Scholar

    [8]

    Dholakia K, Simpson N B, Padgett M J, Allen L 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 R3742Google Scholar

    [9]

    Courtial J, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1997 Phys. Rev. A 56 4193Google Scholar

    [10]

    Andersen M F, Ryu C, Cladé P, Natarajan V, Vaziri A, Helmerson K, Phillips W D 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 170406Google Scholar

    [11]

    Grier D G 2003 Nature 424 810Google Scholar

    [12]

    Paterson L, MacDonald M P, Arlt J, Sibbett W, Bryant P E, Dholakia K 2001 Science 292 912Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kong L J, Qian S X, Ren Z C, Wang X L, Wang H T 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 035804Google Scholar

    [14]

    Dennis M R, King R P, Jack B, O’Holleran K, Padgett M J 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 118Google Scholar

    [15]

    Larocque H, Sugic D, Mortimer D, Taylor A J, Fickler R, Boyd R W, Dennis M R, Karimi E 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 1079Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang L, Zhang W X, Yin H X, Zhang X D 2019 Adv. Opt. Mater. 7 1900263Google Scholar

    [17]

    Kong L J, Zhang W, Li P, Guo X, Zhang J, Zhang F, Zhao J, Zhang X 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 2705Google Scholar

    [18]

    Fürhapter S, Jesacher A, Bernet S, Ritsch-Marte M 2005 Opt. Express 13 689Google Scholar

    [19]

    Kozawa Y, Matsunaga D, Sato S 2018 Optica 5 86Google Scholar

    [20]

    Fang X, Ren H, Gu M 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 102Google Scholar

    [21]

    Kong L J, Sun Y, Zhang F, Zhang J, Zhang X 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 053602Google Scholar

    [22]

    Zhuang X 2004 Science 305 188Google Scholar

    [23]

    Berkhout G C G, Beijersbergen M W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 100801Google Scholar

    [24]

    Ke Z J, Wang Y T, Yu S, Liu W, Meng Y, Li Z P, Wang H, Li Q, Xu J S, Xiao Y, Tang J S, Li C F, Guo G C 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 080301Google Scholar

    [25]

    Friese M E J, Nieminen T A, Heckenberg N R, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H 1998 Nature 394 348Google Scholar

    [26]

    Friese M E J, Enger J, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H, Heckenberg N R 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 1593Google Scholar

    [27]

    Simpson N B, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1997 Opt. Lett. 22 52Google Scholar

    [28]

    Bialynicki-Birula I, Bialynicka-Birula Z 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2539Google Scholar

    [29]

    Courtial J, Dholakia K, Robertson D A, Allen L, Padgett M J 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 3217Google Scholar

    [30]

    Courtial J, Robertson D A, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 4828Google Scholar

    [31]

    Lavery M P J, Speirits F C, Barnett S M, Padgett M J 2013 Science 341 537Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wang J, Yang J Y, Fazal I M, Ahmed N, Yan Y, Huang H, Ren Y, Yue Y, Dolinar S, Tur M, Willner A E 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 488Google Scholar

    [33]

    Huang H, Xie G, Yan Y, Ahmed N, Ren Y, Yue Y, Rogawski D, Willner M J, Erkmen B I, Birnbaum K M, Dolinar S J, Lavery M P J, Padgett M J, Tur M, Willner A E 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 197Google Scholar

    [34]

    Krenn M, Handsteiner J, Fink M, Fickler R, Ursin R, Malik M, Zeilinger A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 13648Google Scholar

    [35]

    Watkins R J, Dai K, White G, Li W, Miller J K, Morgan K S, Johnson E G 2020 Opt. Express 28 924Google Scholar

    [36]

    Bozinovic N, Yue Y, Ren Y, Tur M, Kristensen P, Huang H, Willner A E, Ramachandran S 2013 Science 340 1545Google Scholar

    [37]

    Mair A, Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2001 Nature 412 313Google Scholar

    [38]

    Kong L J, Li Y, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Q, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Si Y, Tu C, Hu W, Xu F, Lu Y Q, Wang H T 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 023822Google Scholar

    [39]

    Kong L J, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Wang Q, Tu C, Li Y, Wang H T 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaat9206Google Scholar

    [40]

    Romero J, Giovannini D, Franke-Arnold S, Barnett S M, Padgett M J 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 012334Google Scholar

    [41]

    Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 240401Google Scholar

    [42]

    Kong L J, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Tu C, Li Y, Wang H T 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 034204Google Scholar

    [43]

    Zhang Y, Agnew M, Roger T, Roux F S, Konrad T, Faccio D, Leach J, Forbes A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 632Google Scholar

    [44]

    Dada A C, Leach J, Buller G S, Padgett M J, Andersson E 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 677Google Scholar

    [45]

    Berkhout G C G, Lavery M P J, Courtial J, Beijersbergen M W, Padgett M J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 153601Google Scholar

    [46]

    Wan C, Chen J, Zhan Q 2017 APL Photonics 2 031302Google Scholar

    [47]

    Wen Y, Chremmos I, Chen Y, Zhu J, Zhang Y, Yu S 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 193904Google Scholar

    [48]

    Malik M, Erhard M, Huber M, Krenn M, Fickler R, Zeilinger A 2016 Nat. Photonics 10 248Google Scholar

    [49]

    Wang F, Erhard M, Babazadeh A, Malik M, Krenn M, Zeilinger A 2017 Optica 4 1462Google Scholar

    [50]

    Babazadeh A, Erhard M, Wang F, Malik M, Nouroozi R, Krenn M, Zeilinger A 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 180510Google Scholar

    [51]

    Wang X L, Luo Y H, Huang H L, Chen M C, Su Z E, Liu C, Chen C, Li W, Fang Y Q, Jiang X, Zhang J, Li L, Liu N L, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 260502Google Scholar

    [52]

    Cao H, Gao S C, Zhang C, Wang J, He D Y, Liu B H, Zhou Z W, Chen Y J, Li Z H, Yu S Y, Romero J, Huang Y F, Li C F, Guo G C 2020 Optica 7 232Google Scholar

    [53]

    Leach J, Padgett M J, Barnett S M, Franke-Arnold S, Courtial J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 257901Google Scholar

    [54]

    Wang F X, Chen W, Yin Z Q, Wang S, Guo G C, Han Z F 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 033847Google Scholar

    [55]

    Zhang W, Qi Q, Zhou J, Chen L 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 153601Google Scholar

    [56]

    Xue P, Zhang R, Bian Z, Zhan X, Qin H, Sanders B C 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 042316Google Scholar

    [57]

    Guo P, Wang S 2022 Photonics 10 1Google Scholar

    [58]

    Narushima T, Okamoto H 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 35731Google Scholar

    [59]

    Li P, Guo X, Qi S, Han L, Zhang Y, Liu S, Li Y, Zhao J 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 9831Google Scholar

    [60]

    Chi Y, Yu Y, Gong Q, Wang J 2023 Sci. China Inf. Sci. 66 180501Google Scholar

    [61]

    Lei T, Zhang M, Li Y R, Jia P, Liu G N, Xu X G, Li Z H, Min C J, Lin J, Yu C Y, Niu H B, Yuan X C 2015 Light Sci. Appl. 4 e257Google Scholar

  • 图 1  D-PP对图像的旋转作用 (a)水平放置的PP对图像(绿色字母R)两次反射的情况. 这里, 光束垂直入射到PP的前表面; (b) PP的旋转对图像旋转的影响. 这里, 光束垂直入射到PP的前表面, PP的旋转轴平行于入射光束传播的方向; (c) 以平行于入射光束传播方向为旋转轴, PP相对于水平放置的旋转角度$\alpha $和经过两次反射之后的图像的旋转角度$\beta $之间的关系, 黑色实线为理论结果, 黄色填充的红圈为实验结果; (d) D-PP的构成, 由两个PP构成. 其中一个PP相对于水平放置旋转角度为$\alpha $; 另一个PP相对于水平放置旋转角度为$ - \alpha $

    Fig. 1.  Rotation effect of D-PP on image: (a) Situation where the image (green letter R) experience two reflections in PP placed horizontally, here, the light field is vertically incident on the front surface of PP; (b) the impact of PP rotation on image rotation, here, the light field is vertically incident on the front surface of PP, and the rotation axis of PP is parallel to the direction of propagation of the incident light field; (c) the relationship between the rotation angle α of the PP and the rotation angle $\beta $of the image after two reflections, the rotation axis is parallel to the propagation direction of the incident light field, the solid black line represents the theoretical results, and the red circles filled in yellow represent the experimental results; (d) composition of D-PP, a D-PP can be seen as a combination of two PPs, the rotation angle of one PP is α, and the rotation angle of another PP is $ - \alpha $.

    图 2  基于BD设计的OAM分束器以及不同参数设置下的分束情况 (a) OAM分束器的构成和光路图, 其中, WP1, WP2, WP3表示偏振补偿波片, RP代表直角棱镜, a, a1, a2, b, b1, b2, c, c1, c2, o1, o2表示光束在分束器中所走的路径, 右上角为装置的整体效果图, 左下角为装置的实物图; (b)不同参数情况下的分束情况, $\alpha $为PP旋转的角度, $\delta $为WP1引入的两束正交偏振光之间的相对相位差, $l$为OAM拓扑荷数, ${P_{o1}}$和${P_{o2}}$为输出端口$o1$和$o2$的输出功率

    Fig. 2.  OAM beam splitter based on BD and beam splitting under different parameter conditions: (a) Composition of the OAM beam splitter and optical path diagram in it. Here, WP1, WP2, and WP3 represent polarization compensation waveplates; RP represents a right-angle prism. a, a1, a2, b, b1, b2, c, c1, c2, o1, o2 indicate the path of the beam in the beam splitter, the upper right corner shows the overall rendering of the device, the lower left corner shows the physical image of the device; (b) beam splitting under different parameter conditions, $\alpha $ is the rotation angle of PP, $\delta $ is the relative phase difference between the two orthogonal polarized beams introduced by WP1, $l$ is the topological charge of OAM, ${P_{o1}}$ and ${P_{o2}}$ are the output powers of the output ports $o1$ and $o2$.

    图 3  不同参数下不同拓扑荷数OAM态分束的实验结果 (a)参数设置为$ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/4, 0)时, OAM态$\left| 1 \right\rangle $和$\left| 2 \right\rangle $分束的结果; (b)参数设置为$ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, π/2)时, OAM态$\left| 1 \right\rangle $和$\left| 3 \right\rangle $分束的结果, 图中的百分数表示对某种入射OAM态, 不同端口的输出功率相对于所有端口输出的总功率的比值

    Fig. 3.  Experimental results of beam splitting of OAM states with different topological charges in OAM sorter with different parameters: (a) Results of beam splitting of OAM states $\left| 1 \right\rangle $and $\left| 2 \right\rangle $when the parameters are set as $ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/4, 0); (b) results of beam splitting of OAM states $\left| 1 \right\rangle $and $\left| 3 \right\rangle $when the parameters are set as $ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, π/2), each percentage represents the ratio of each output power to the total output power of all ports for a certain incident OAM state.

    图 4  级联情况下的分束情况 (a)级联OAM分束器. 针对要分开的OAM态为$\left| 1 \right\rangle $, $\left| 2 \right\rangle $, $\left| 7 \right\rangle $和$\left| 8 \right\rangle $, 第1级的OAM分束器参数设为$ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/4, π), 第2级的两个OAM分束器分别设置为$ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, 3π/2)和$ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, π), 级联后, 有o1o1, o1o2, o2o1和o2o2四个输出端口; (b)级联OAM分束器对OAM态$\left| 1 \right\rangle $, $\left| 2 \right\rangle $, $\left| 7 \right\rangle $和$\left| 8 \right\rangle $分束的实验结果, 图中的百分数表示对某种入射OAM态, 不同端口的输出功率相对于所有端口输出的总功率的比值

    Fig. 4.  Beam splitting in the cascading case: (a) Cascaded OAM beam splitters. Due to that the OAM states to be separated are $\left| 1 \right\rangle $, $\left| 2 \right\rangle $, $\left| 7 \right\rangle $ and $\left| 8 \right\rangle $, the parameters of the first stage OAM splitter are set as $ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/4, π), and the two OAM splitters of the second stage are set as $ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, 3π/2) and $ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, π), respectively, after cascading, there are four output ports, o1o1, o1o2, o2o1, and o2o2; (b) experimental results of cascading OAM beam splitters for OAM states $\left| 1 \right\rangle $, $\left| 2 \right\rangle $, $\left| 7 \right\rangle $ and $\left| 8 \right\rangle $, each percentage represents the ratio of each output power to the total output power of all ports for a certain incident OAM state.

  • [1]

    Coullet P, Gil L, Rocca F 1989 Opt. Commun. 73 403Google Scholar

    [2]

    Allen L, Beijersbergen M W, Spreeuw R J C, Woerdman J P 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 8185Google Scholar

    [3]

    Li S M, Kong L J, Ren Z C, Li Y, Tu C, Wang H T 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 035801Google Scholar

    [4]

    Neshev D N, Alexander T J, Ostrovskaya E A, Kivshar Y S, Martin H, Makasyuk I, Chen Z 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 123903Google Scholar

    [5]

    Swartzlander G A, Law C T 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2503Google Scholar

    [6]

    Tikhonenko V, Christou J, Luther-Daves B 1995 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12 2046Google Scholar

    [7]

    Firth W J, Skryabin D V 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 2450Google Scholar

    [8]

    Dholakia K, Simpson N B, Padgett M J, Allen L 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 R3742Google Scholar

    [9]

    Courtial J, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1997 Phys. Rev. A 56 4193Google Scholar

    [10]

    Andersen M F, Ryu C, Cladé P, Natarajan V, Vaziri A, Helmerson K, Phillips W D 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 170406Google Scholar

    [11]

    Grier D G 2003 Nature 424 810Google Scholar

    [12]

    Paterson L, MacDonald M P, Arlt J, Sibbett W, Bryant P E, Dholakia K 2001 Science 292 912Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kong L J, Qian S X, Ren Z C, Wang X L, Wang H T 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 035804Google Scholar

    [14]

    Dennis M R, King R P, Jack B, O’Holleran K, Padgett M J 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 118Google Scholar

    [15]

    Larocque H, Sugic D, Mortimer D, Taylor A J, Fickler R, Boyd R W, Dennis M R, Karimi E 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 1079Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang L, Zhang W X, Yin H X, Zhang X D 2019 Adv. Opt. Mater. 7 1900263Google Scholar

    [17]

    Kong L J, Zhang W, Li P, Guo X, Zhang J, Zhang F, Zhao J, Zhang X 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 2705Google Scholar

    [18]

    Fürhapter S, Jesacher A, Bernet S, Ritsch-Marte M 2005 Opt. Express 13 689Google Scholar

    [19]

    Kozawa Y, Matsunaga D, Sato S 2018 Optica 5 86Google Scholar

    [20]

    Fang X, Ren H, Gu M 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 102Google Scholar

    [21]

    Kong L J, Sun Y, Zhang F, Zhang J, Zhang X 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 053602Google Scholar

    [22]

    Zhuang X 2004 Science 305 188Google Scholar

    [23]

    Berkhout G C G, Beijersbergen M W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 100801Google Scholar

    [24]

    Ke Z J, Wang Y T, Yu S, Liu W, Meng Y, Li Z P, Wang H, Li Q, Xu J S, Xiao Y, Tang J S, Li C F, Guo G C 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 080301Google Scholar

    [25]

    Friese M E J, Nieminen T A, Heckenberg N R, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H 1998 Nature 394 348Google Scholar

    [26]

    Friese M E J, Enger J, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H, Heckenberg N R 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 1593Google Scholar

    [27]

    Simpson N B, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1997 Opt. Lett. 22 52Google Scholar

    [28]

    Bialynicki-Birula I, Bialynicka-Birula Z 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2539Google Scholar

    [29]

    Courtial J, Dholakia K, Robertson D A, Allen L, Padgett M J 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 3217Google Scholar

    [30]

    Courtial J, Robertson D A, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 4828Google Scholar

    [31]

    Lavery M P J, Speirits F C, Barnett S M, Padgett M J 2013 Science 341 537Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wang J, Yang J Y, Fazal I M, Ahmed N, Yan Y, Huang H, Ren Y, Yue Y, Dolinar S, Tur M, Willner A E 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 488Google Scholar

    [33]

    Huang H, Xie G, Yan Y, Ahmed N, Ren Y, Yue Y, Rogawski D, Willner M J, Erkmen B I, Birnbaum K M, Dolinar S J, Lavery M P J, Padgett M J, Tur M, Willner A E 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 197Google Scholar

    [34]

    Krenn M, Handsteiner J, Fink M, Fickler R, Ursin R, Malik M, Zeilinger A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 13648Google Scholar

    [35]

    Watkins R J, Dai K, White G, Li W, Miller J K, Morgan K S, Johnson E G 2020 Opt. Express 28 924Google Scholar

    [36]

    Bozinovic N, Yue Y, Ren Y, Tur M, Kristensen P, Huang H, Willner A E, Ramachandran S 2013 Science 340 1545Google Scholar

    [37]

    Mair A, Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2001 Nature 412 313Google Scholar

    [38]

    Kong L J, Li Y, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Q, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Si Y, Tu C, Hu W, Xu F, Lu Y Q, Wang H T 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 023822Google Scholar

    [39]

    Kong L J, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Wang Q, Tu C, Li Y, Wang H T 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaat9206Google Scholar

    [40]

    Romero J, Giovannini D, Franke-Arnold S, Barnett S M, Padgett M J 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 012334Google Scholar

    [41]

    Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 240401Google Scholar

    [42]

    Kong L J, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Tu C, Li Y, Wang H T 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 034204Google Scholar

    [43]

    Zhang Y, Agnew M, Roger T, Roux F S, Konrad T, Faccio D, Leach J, Forbes A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 632Google Scholar

    [44]

    Dada A C, Leach J, Buller G S, Padgett M J, Andersson E 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 677Google Scholar

    [45]

    Berkhout G C G, Lavery M P J, Courtial J, Beijersbergen M W, Padgett M J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 153601Google Scholar

    [46]

    Wan C, Chen J, Zhan Q 2017 APL Photonics 2 031302Google Scholar

    [47]

    Wen Y, Chremmos I, Chen Y, Zhu J, Zhang Y, Yu S 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 193904Google Scholar

    [48]

    Malik M, Erhard M, Huber M, Krenn M, Fickler R, Zeilinger A 2016 Nat. Photonics 10 248Google Scholar

    [49]

    Wang F, Erhard M, Babazadeh A, Malik M, Krenn M, Zeilinger A 2017 Optica 4 1462Google Scholar

    [50]

    Babazadeh A, Erhard M, Wang F, Malik M, Nouroozi R, Krenn M, Zeilinger A 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 180510Google Scholar

    [51]

    Wang X L, Luo Y H, Huang H L, Chen M C, Su Z E, Liu C, Chen C, Li W, Fang Y Q, Jiang X, Zhang J, Li L, Liu N L, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 260502Google Scholar

    [52]

    Cao H, Gao S C, Zhang C, Wang J, He D Y, Liu B H, Zhou Z W, Chen Y J, Li Z H, Yu S Y, Romero J, Huang Y F, Li C F, Guo G C 2020 Optica 7 232Google Scholar

    [53]

    Leach J, Padgett M J, Barnett S M, Franke-Arnold S, Courtial J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 257901Google Scholar

    [54]

    Wang F X, Chen W, Yin Z Q, Wang S, Guo G C, Han Z F 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 033847Google Scholar

    [55]

    Zhang W, Qi Q, Zhou J, Chen L 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 153601Google Scholar

    [56]

    Xue P, Zhang R, Bian Z, Zhan X, Qin H, Sanders B C 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 042316Google Scholar

    [57]

    Guo P, Wang S 2022 Photonics 10 1Google Scholar

    [58]

    Narushima T, Okamoto H 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 35731Google Scholar

    [59]

    Li P, Guo X, Qi S, Han L, Zhang Y, Liu S, Li Y, Zhao J 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 9831Google Scholar

    [60]

    Chi Y, Yu Y, Gong Q, Wang J 2023 Sci. China Inf. Sci. 66 180501Google Scholar

    [61]

    Lei T, Zhang M, Li Y R, Jia P, Liu G N, Xu X G, Li Z H, Min C J, Lin J, Yu C Y, Niu H B, Yuan X C 2015 Light Sci. Appl. 4 e257Google Scholar

  • [1] 陈波, 刘进, 李俊韬, 王雪华. 轨道角动量量子光源的集成化研究. 物理学报, 2024, 73(16): 164204. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240791
    [2] 徐梦敏, 李晓庆, 唐荣, 季小玲. 风控热晕对双模涡旋光束大气传输的轨道角动量和相位奇异性的影响. 物理学报, 2023, 72(16): 164202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230684
    [3] 吴航, 陈燎, 舒学文, 张新亮. 基于飞秒激光加工长周期光栅的全光纤三阶轨道角动量模式的产生. 物理学报, 2023, 72(4): 044201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221928
    [4] 赵丽娟, 姜焕秋, 徐志钮. 螺旋扭曲双包层-三芯光子晶体光纤用于轨道角动量的生成. 物理学报, 2023, 72(13): 134201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222405
    [5] 刘瑞熙, 马磊. 海洋湍流对光子轨道角动量量子通信的影响. 物理学报, 2022, 71(1): 010304. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211146
    [6] 高喜, 唐李光. 基于双层超表面的宽带、高效透射型轨道角动量发生器. 物理学报, 2021, 70(3): 038101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20200975
    [7] 蒋基恒, 余世星, 寇娜, 丁召, 张正平. 基于平面相控阵的轨道角动量涡旋电磁波扫描特性. 物理学报, 2021, 70(23): 238401. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211119
    [8] 崔粲, 王智, 李强, 吴重庆, 王健. 长周期多芯手征光纤轨道角动量的调制. 物理学报, 2019, 68(6): 064211. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182036
    [9] 付时尧, 高春清. 利用衍射光栅探测涡旋光束轨道角动量态的研究进展. 物理学报, 2018, 67(3): 034201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171899
    [10] 范榕华, 郭邦红, 郭建军, 张程贤, 张文杰, 杜戈. 基于轨道角动量的多自由度W态纠缠系统. 物理学报, 2015, 64(14): 140301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.140301
    [11] 柯熙政, 谌娟, 杨一明. 在大气湍流斜程传输中拉盖高斯光束的轨道角动量的研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(15): 150301. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.150301
    [12] 齐晓庆, 高春清, 辛璟焘, 张戈. 基于激光光束轨道角动量的8位数据信号产生与检测的实验研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(17): 174204. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.174204
    [13] 李铁, 谌娟, 柯熙政, 吕宏. 大气信道中单光子轨道角动量纠缠特性的研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(12): 124208. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.124208
    [14] 齐晓庆, 高春清. 螺旋相位光束轨道角动量态测量的实验研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(1): 014208. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.014208
    [15] 柯熙政, 卢宁, 杨秦岭. 单光子轨道角动量的传输特性研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(9): 6159-6163. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6159
    [16] 吕宏, 柯熙政. 具有轨道角动量光束入射下的单球粒子散射研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(12): 8302-8308. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.8302
    [17] 苏志锟, 王发强, 路轶群, 金锐博, 梁瑞生, 刘颂豪. 基于光子轨道角动量的密码通信方案研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(5): 3016-3021. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3016
    [18] 高明伟, 高春清, 林志锋. 扭转对称光束的产生及其变换过程中的轨道角动量传递. 物理学报, 2007, 56(4): 2184-2190. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2184
    [19] 董一鸣, 徐云飞, 张 璋, 林 强. 复杂像散椭圆光束的轨道角动量的实验研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(11): 5755-5759. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5755
    [20] 高明伟, 高春清, 何晓燕, 李家泽, 魏光辉. 利用具有轨道角动量的光束实现微粒的旋转. 物理学报, 2004, 53(2): 413-417. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.413
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2071
  • PDF下载量:  100
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-11-29
  • 修回日期:  2023-12-21
  • 上网日期:  2024-01-16
  • 刊出日期:  2024-04-05

/

返回文章
返回