Recent progress of expansion dynamics in strongly-interacting ultracold Fermi gases

Diao Peng-Peng; Deng Shu-Jin; Li Fang; Wu Hai-Bin

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20182293

Abstract

The evolution of non-equilibrium dynamic for many-body systems is one of the most challenging problems in physics. Ultra-cold quantum atomic Fermi gas provide an test-bed for studying many-body non-equilibrium dynamics due to its high freedom of controllability, which can be used to simulate and understand the dynamics of the early universe after the Big Bang, quark-gluon produced in heavy ion collisions and nuclear physics. Generally, the evolution of many-body systems is very complex, and usually needs to be studied by symmetry. Feshbach resonance can be used to prepare scale invariant atomic Fermi gases: non-interacting and unitary Fermi gases. When far away from equilibrium state, universal exponents and functions can be used to characterize the dynamics of the system, which can be identified by scaling the temporal and spatial evolution of the system. In this review, the recent developments in the expansion dynamics of strongly interacting ultracold Fermi gases are introduced, including the anisotropic expansion of atomic gases, scaling dynamics and Efimovian expansion dynamics.

Keywords:

strongly-interacting ultracold Fermi gas /
Feshbach resonance /
anisotropic expansions /
scale invariance /
Efimovian expansion dynamics

Authors and contacts

State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Corresponding author: Wu Hai-Bin, hbwu@phy.ecnu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0304201), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.11734008, 11374101, 91536112, 116214040), the Excellent Leaders of Disciplines in Science of Shanghai, China (Grant No. 17XD1401500), and the Basic Research Program of Shanghai, China (Grant No. 17JC1400500).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	DeMarco B, Jin D S 1999 Science 285 1703 Google Scholar
[2]	O’Hara K M, Hemmer S L, Gehm M E, Granade S R, Thomas J E 2002 Science 298 2179 Google Scholar
[3]	Kinast J, Hemmer S L, Gehm M E, Turlapov A, Thomas J E 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 150402 Google Scholar
[4]	Bartenstein M, Altmeyer A, Riedl S, Jochim S, Chin C, Denschlag J H, Grimm R 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 203201 Google Scholar
[5]	Regal C A, Greiner M, Giorgini S, Holland M, Jin D S 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 250404 Google Scholar
[6]	Partridge G B, Strecker K E, Kamar R I, Jack M W, Hulet R G 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 020404 Google Scholar
[7]	Bartenstein M, Altmeyer A, Riedl S, Jochim S, Chin C, Denschlag J H, Grimm R 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 120401 Google Scholar
[8]	Zwierlein M W, Abo-Shaeer J R, Schirotzek A, Schunck C H, Ketterle W 2005 Nature 435 1047 Google Scholar
[9]	Liao Y, Rittner A, Paprotta T, Li W, Partridge G, Hulet R G, Baur S K, Mueller E J 2010 Nature 467 567 Google Scholar
[10]	Nguyen J H V, Luo D, Hulet R G 2017 Science 356 422 Google Scholar
[11]	Greif D, Parsons M F, Mazurenko A, Chiu C S, Blatt S, Huber F, Ji G, Greiner M 2016 Science 351 953 Google Scholar
[12]	Mazurenko A, Chiu C S, Ji G, Parsons M F, Kanasz-Nagy M, Schmidt R, Grusdt F, Demler E, Greif D, Greiner M 2017 Nature 545 462 Google Scholar
[13]	Hart R A, Duarte P M, Yang T, Liu X, Paiva T, Khatami E, Scalettar R T, Trivedi N, Huse D A, Hulet R G 2015 Nature 519 211 Google Scholar
[14]	Wang P, Yu Z, Fu Z, Miao J, Huang L, Chai S, Zhai H, Zhang J 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 095301 Google Scholar
[15]	Hoinka S, Lingham M, Delehaye M, Vale C J 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 050403 Google Scholar
[16]	Deng S, Shi Z, Diao P, Yu Q, Zhai H, Qi R, Wu H 2016 Science 353 371 Google Scholar
[17]	Lu M, Burdick N Q, Lev B L 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 215301 Google Scholar
[18]	Aikawa K, Frisch A, Mark M, Baier S, Grimm R, Ferlaino F 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 010404 Google Scholar
[19]	Ku M J, Sommer A T, Cheuk L W, Zwierlein M W 2012 Science 335 563 Google Scholar
[20]	Kinast J, Turlapov A, Thomas J E, Chen Q, Stajic J, Levin K 2005 Science 307 1296 Google Scholar
[21]	Nascimbéne S, Navon N, Jiang K J, Chevy F, Salomon C 2010 Nature 463 1057 Google Scholar
[22]	Clancy B, Luo L, Thomas J E 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 140401 Google Scholar
[23]	Kinnunen J, Rodríguez M, Törmä P 2004 Science 305 1131 Google Scholar
[24]	Chin C, Bartenstein M, Altmeyer A, Riedl S, Jochim S, Denschlag J H, Grimm R 2004 Science 305 1128 Google Scholar
[25]	Cao C, Elliott E, Joseph J, Wu H, Petricka J, Schäfer T, Thomas J E 2011 Science 331 58 Google Scholar
[26]	Bluhm M, Hou J, Schäfer T 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 065302 Google Scholar
[27]	Menotti C, Pedri P, Stringari S 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 250402 Google Scholar
[28]	Guéry-Odelin D 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 033613 Google Scholar
[29]	Castin Y, Dum R 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 5315 Google Scholar
[30]	Kagan Y, Surkov E L, Shlyapnikov G 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 R1753 Google Scholar
[31]	Ho T L 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 090402 Google Scholar
[32]	Makotyn P, Klauss C E, Goldberger D L, Cornell E A, Jin D S 2014 Nature Physics 10 116 Google Scholar
[33]	Bulgac A, Drut J E, Magierski P 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 120401 Google Scholar
[34]	Elliott E, Joseph J A, Thomas J E 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 040405 Google Scholar
[35]	Efimov V 1970 Phys. Lett. B 33 563 Google Scholar
[36]	Kraemer T, Mark M, Waldburger P, Danzl J G, Chin C, Engeser B, Lange A D, Pilch K, Jaakkola A, Nägerl H C, Grimm R 2006 Nature 440 315 Google Scholar
[37]	Braaten E, Hammer H W 2006 Phys. Rep. 428 259 Google Scholar
[38]	Braaten E, Hammer H W 2007 Ann. Phys. 322 120 Google Scholar
[39]	Gharashi S E, Blume D 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 063639 Google Scholar
[40]	Riedl S, Sánchez Guajardo E R, Kohstall C, Altmeyer A, Wright M J, Denschlag J H, Grimm R, Bruun G M, Smith H 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 053609 Google Scholar
[41]	Kinast J, Turlapov A, Thomas J E 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 170404 Google Scholar
[42]	Deng S, Diao P, Li F, Yu Q, Yu S, Wu H 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 125301 Google Scholar
[43]	Nishida, Moroz S, Son D T 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 235301 Google Scholar
[44]	Moroz S, Nishida Y 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 063631 Google Scholar
[45]	Ulmanis J, Häfner S, Kuhnle E D, Weidemüller M 2016 Nat. Sci. Rev. 3 174 Google Scholar
[46]	Shi Z, Qi R, Zhai H, Yu Z 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 050702 Google Scholar
[47]	Zhang L, Wen W, Ma X D, Wang Y 2018 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 32 1850230 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 (a)强相互作用超冷费米气体的各向异性膨胀吸收成像图; (b)原子团不同方向的非平衡动力学膨胀行为; (c)不同相互作用下原子团的纵横比大小演化图^[2]

Figure 1. (a)The absorption image of the anisotropic expansion dynamics in strongly interacting Fermi gas; (b) the non-equilibrium dynamical expansion behavior in different directions; (c) the evolution for the aspect ratio of the atomic cloud under different interaction regime^[2].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 幺正费米气体和无相互作用费米气体的标度不变展开动力学^[34]

Figure 2. Scale invariant expansion of a resonantly interacting Fermi gas compared with the non-interacting Fermi gas^[34].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 Feshbach共振点附近费米气体膨胀动力学的对称性破缺行为, 从上到下依次为BCS区域、幺正区域和BEC区域^[34]

Figure 3. Conformal symmetry breaking in the expansion for a Fermi gas near a Feshbach resonance. Top: BCS region; Center: unitary region; Bottom: BEC region^[34].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 Efimovian膨胀动力学示意图　(a), (b)原子气体所处谐振子阱频率的变化过程; (c)Efimovian 膨胀动力学的理论预测; (d), (e)分别代表无相互作用费米气体和强相互作用费米气体的Efimovian 膨胀动力学的实验观测结果^[16]

Figure 4. The Efimovian expansion dynamics: (a) and (b) are the evolution of the harmonic trap frequency; (c) the prediction of the Efimovian expansion dynamics; (d) and (e) are the experimental observation of the Efimovian expansion in non-interacting Fermi gas and unitary Fermi gas respectively^[16].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 Efimovian膨胀动力学的普适性　(a) Efimovian 膨胀动力学与原子间相互作用的关系; (b) Efimovian 膨胀动力学与原子数目、温度间的关系; (c), (d)无量纲化后的普适Efimovian 动力学膨胀图^[16]

Figure 5. The universality of the Efimovian expansion dynamics: (a) The Efimovian expansion with different interaction regime; (b) the Efimovian expansion with different atoms' number and temperature; (c) and (d) are the universal dimensionless Efimovian expansions^[16].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 超级Efimovian 膨胀动力学实验结果　(a)和(c)分别表示幺正费米气体和无相互作用费米气体的超级Efimov 动力学效应; (b)和(d)表示在时间双对数标度下相应原子团大小的振荡行为^[42]

Figure 6. The experimental observation of dynamical super Efimovian expansion. (a), (b) and (c), (d) are the mean axial cloud size versus the expansion time and the dimensionless axial mean square cloud size versus the dimensionless time in the unitary Fermi gas and ideal Fermi gas, respectively^[42].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 超级Efimovian 膨胀过程中的内能和势能在时间(a)及其双对数标度(b)下的变化示意图^[42]

Figure 7. The axial potential (internal) energy ratio versus expansion time (a) and the axial energy scaling versus dimensionless time (b) for the super Efimovian expansion^[42].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	DeMarco B, Jin D S 1999 Science 285 1703 Google Scholar
[2]	O’Hara K M, Hemmer S L, Gehm M E, Granade S R, Thomas J E 2002 Science 298 2179 Google Scholar
[3]	Kinast J, Hemmer S L, Gehm M E, Turlapov A, Thomas J E 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 150402 Google Scholar
[4]	Bartenstein M, Altmeyer A, Riedl S, Jochim S, Chin C, Denschlag J H, Grimm R 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 203201 Google Scholar
[5]	Regal C A, Greiner M, Giorgini S, Holland M, Jin D S 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 250404 Google Scholar
[6]	Partridge G B, Strecker K E, Kamar R I, Jack M W, Hulet R G 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 020404 Google Scholar
[7]	Bartenstein M, Altmeyer A, Riedl S, Jochim S, Chin C, Denschlag J H, Grimm R 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 120401 Google Scholar
[8]	Zwierlein M W, Abo-Shaeer J R, Schirotzek A, Schunck C H, Ketterle W 2005 Nature 435 1047 Google Scholar
[9]	Liao Y, Rittner A, Paprotta T, Li W, Partridge G, Hulet R G, Baur S K, Mueller E J 2010 Nature 467 567 Google Scholar
[10]	Nguyen J H V, Luo D, Hulet R G 2017 Science 356 422 Google Scholar
[11]	Greif D, Parsons M F, Mazurenko A, Chiu C S, Blatt S, Huber F, Ji G, Greiner M 2016 Science 351 953 Google Scholar
[12]	Mazurenko A, Chiu C S, Ji G, Parsons M F, Kanasz-Nagy M, Schmidt R, Grusdt F, Demler E, Greif D, Greiner M 2017 Nature 545 462 Google Scholar
[13]	Hart R A, Duarte P M, Yang T, Liu X, Paiva T, Khatami E, Scalettar R T, Trivedi N, Huse D A, Hulet R G 2015 Nature 519 211 Google Scholar
[14]	Wang P, Yu Z, Fu Z, Miao J, Huang L, Chai S, Zhai H, Zhang J 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 095301 Google Scholar
[15]	Hoinka S, Lingham M, Delehaye M, Vale C J 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 050403 Google Scholar
[16]	Deng S, Shi Z, Diao P, Yu Q, Zhai H, Qi R, Wu H 2016 Science 353 371 Google Scholar
[17]	Lu M, Burdick N Q, Lev B L 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 215301 Google Scholar
[18]	Aikawa K, Frisch A, Mark M, Baier S, Grimm R, Ferlaino F 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 010404 Google Scholar
[19]	Ku M J, Sommer A T, Cheuk L W, Zwierlein M W 2012 Science 335 563 Google Scholar
[20]	Kinast J, Turlapov A, Thomas J E, Chen Q, Stajic J, Levin K 2005 Science 307 1296 Google Scholar
[21]	Nascimbéne S, Navon N, Jiang K J, Chevy F, Salomon C 2010 Nature 463 1057 Google Scholar
[22]	Clancy B, Luo L, Thomas J E 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 140401 Google Scholar
[23]	Kinnunen J, Rodríguez M, Törmä P 2004 Science 305 1131 Google Scholar
[24]	Chin C, Bartenstein M, Altmeyer A, Riedl S, Jochim S, Denschlag J H, Grimm R 2004 Science 305 1128 Google Scholar
[25]	Cao C, Elliott E, Joseph J, Wu H, Petricka J, Schäfer T, Thomas J E 2011 Science 331 58 Google Scholar
[26]	Bluhm M, Hou J, Schäfer T 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 065302 Google Scholar
[27]	Menotti C, Pedri P, Stringari S 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 250402 Google Scholar
[28]	Guéry-Odelin D 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 033613 Google Scholar
[29]	Castin Y, Dum R 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 5315 Google Scholar
[30]	Kagan Y, Surkov E L, Shlyapnikov G 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 R1753 Google Scholar
[31]	Ho T L 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 090402 Google Scholar
[32]	Makotyn P, Klauss C E, Goldberger D L, Cornell E A, Jin D S 2014 Nature Physics 10 116 Google Scholar
[33]	Bulgac A, Drut J E, Magierski P 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 120401 Google Scholar
[34]	Elliott E, Joseph J A, Thomas J E 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 040405 Google Scholar
[35]	Efimov V 1970 Phys. Lett. B 33 563 Google Scholar
[36]	Kraemer T, Mark M, Waldburger P, Danzl J G, Chin C, Engeser B, Lange A D, Pilch K, Jaakkola A, Nägerl H C, Grimm R 2006 Nature 440 315 Google Scholar
[37]	Braaten E, Hammer H W 2006 Phys. Rep. 428 259 Google Scholar
[38]	Braaten E, Hammer H W 2007 Ann. Phys. 322 120 Google Scholar
[39]	Gharashi S E, Blume D 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 063639 Google Scholar
[40]	Riedl S, Sánchez Guajardo E R, Kohstall C, Altmeyer A, Wright M J, Denschlag J H, Grimm R, Bruun G M, Smith H 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 053609 Google Scholar
[41]	Kinast J, Turlapov A, Thomas J E 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 170404 Google Scholar
[42]	Deng S, Diao P, Li F, Yu Q, Yu S, Wu H 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 125301 Google Scholar
[43]	Nishida, Moroz S, Son D T 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 235301 Google Scholar
[44]	Moroz S, Nishida Y 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 063631 Google Scholar
[45]	Ulmanis J, Häfner S, Kuhnle E D, Weidemüller M 2016 Nat. Sci. Rev. 3 174 Google Scholar
[46]	Shi Z, Qi R, Zhai H, Yu Z 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 050702 Google Scholar
[47]	Zhang L, Wen W, Ma X D, Wang Y 2018 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 32 1850230 Google Scholar

[1]	Yin Xiang-Guo, Yu Hai-Ru, Hao Ya-Jiang, Zhang Yun-Bo. Properties of ground state and quench dynamics of one-dimensional contact repulsive single-spin flipped Fermi gases. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(2): 020302. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231425
[2]	Liu Xue-Mei, Rui Yang, Zhang Liang, Wu Yue-Long, Wu Hai-Bin. High-precision magnetic field locking system for cold atoms. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(14): 145205. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220399
[3]	Bai Jing, Xie Ting. Ultracold atom-atom collisions by renormalized Numerov method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(3): 033401. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211308
[4]	. Surveying ultracold atom-atom binary collisions by utilizing renormalized Numerov method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211308
[5]	Jiang Han, Chen Ming-Wen, Wang Tao, Wang Zi-Dong. Effects of anisotropic interface kinetics and surface tension on deep cellular crystal growth in directional solidification. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(10): 106801. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.106801
[6]	Dong Xiang-Lei, Xing Hui, Chen Chang-Le, Sha Sha, Wang Jian-Yuan, Jin Ke-Xin. Phase-Field Modeling of Facet Hexagonal Spirals with Anisotropy, Deposition, and Kinetic Effects. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(2): 020701. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.020701
[7]	Zhang Chun-Yan, Zhao Qing, Fu Li-Bin, Liu Jie. Anisotropic explosions of hydrogen clusters in intense femtosecond laser field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(14): 143601. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.143601
[8]	Gu Wen-Juan, Pan Jing, Du Wei, Hu Jing-Guo. Measurement of magnetic anisotropyby ferromagnetic resonance. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(5): 057601. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.057601
[9]	Chen Xiang-Wei, Zhao Yong-Hong, Liu Chang. Conformal invariance and conserved quantity for holonomic mechanical systems with variable mass. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(8): 5150-5154. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5150
[10]	Yang Ru, Zhang Bo, Chu Li-Li. Research of fine structure and universal constants of bifurcation in converters. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(5): 2770-2778. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2770
[11]	Xia Li-Li, Li Yuan-Cheng, Wang Jing, Hou Qi-Bao. Noether form invariance of nonholonomic controllable mechanical systems of non-Chetaev’s type. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(10): 4995-4998. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4995
[12]	Wu Hong-Yu, Yin Lan. Density profile of a superfluid Fermi gas with a phase slip. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(2): 490-493. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.490
[13]	Ge Wei-Kuan, Zhang Yi. Lie-form invariance of holonomic mechanical systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(11): 4985-4988. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4985
[14]	Zhang Yi. Form invariance of mechanical systems with unilateral holonomic constraints. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(2): 331-336. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.331
[15]	Fang Jian-Hui, Yan Xiang-Hong, Chen Pei-Sheng. Form invariance and Noether symmetry of a relativistic mechanical system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(7): 1561-1564. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1561
[16]	Fang Jian-Hui, Chen Pei-Sheng, Zhang Jun, Li Hong. Form invariance and Lie symmetry of relativistic mechanical system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(12): 2945-2948. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2945
[17]	Fang Jian-Hui, Xue Qing-Zhong, Zhao Shou-Qing. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(10): 2183-2185. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2183
[18]	LI ZI-RONG, MENG QING-AN, GAO QI-JUAN, SUN KE, WEI YU-NIAN. ANISOTROPIC HYPERFINE INTERACTIONS IN Fe4N ALLOY. Acta Physica Sinica, 1996, 45(2): 314-317. doi: 10.7498/aps.45.314
[19]	ZHANG HAI-YAN, XU BO-WEI. INVESTIGATION OF ONE-DIMENSIONAL NNN INTERACTION QUANTUN CHAIN BY CONFORMAL INVA-RIANCE AND THE LANCZOS METHOD. Acta Physica Sinica, 1994, 43(6): 864-871. doi: 10.7498/aps.43.864
[20]	YU JIANG, HU GANG. THE SCALING PROPERTIES OF DLA CLUSTERS WITH ANISOTROPIC DIFFUSION. Acta Physica Sinica, 1989, 38(2): 202-208. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.202

Catalog

Vol. 68, Issue 4 - 2019-02-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 8554
PDF Downloads: 173
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板