-
Under the background that stock index options urgently need launching in China, the research on stock option pricing model has important theoretical and practical significance. In the traditional B-S-M model it is assumed that the volatility remains unchanged, which differs tremendously from the market’s reality. When the market fluctuates drastically, it is difficult to realize the risk management function of stock index options. Although in the Heston model, as one of the traditional stochastic volatility option pricing models, the correlation risk between the volatility and underlying price is taken into consideration, its pricing accuracy is still to be improved. From the quantum finance perspective, in this paper we use the Feynman path integral method to explore a more practical stock index option pricing model. In this paper, we construct a Feynman path integral pricing model of stock index options with stochastic volatility by taking Hang Seng index option as the research object and Heston model as the control group. It is found that the Feynman path integral pricing model is significantly superior to the Heston model either at different strike prices on the same expiration date or at different expiration dates for the same strike price. The stock index option pricing model constructed in this paper can give the numerical solution of Feynman's pricing kernel, and directly realizes the forecast of stock index option price. The pricing accuracy is significantly improved compared with the pricing accuracy given by the Heston model through using the characteristic function method. The remarkable advantages of Feynman path integral stock index option pricing model are as follows. Firstly, the path integral has advantages in solving multivariate problems: the Feynman pricing kernel represents all the information about pricing and can be easily expanded from one-dimensional to multidimensional case, so the change of closing price of stock index and volatility of underlying index can be taken into account simultaneously. Secondly, based on the relationship between the Feynman path generation principle and the law of large number, the mean values of pricing kernel obtained by MATLAB not only optimizes the calculation process, but also significantly improves the pricing accuracy. Feynman path integral is the main method in quantum finance, and the research in this paper will provide reference for its further application in the pricing of financial derivatives. -
Keywords:
- Feynman path integral /
- mean pricing kernel /
- stochastic volatility /
- stock index options pricing
[1] Pan J 2002 J. Financ. Ecno. 63 3
Google Scholar
[2] Eraker B, Johannes M, Polson N 2003 J. Financ. 58 1269
Google Scholar
[3] Broadie M, Chernov M, Johannes M 2007 J. Financ. 62 1453
Google Scholar
[4] 杨智元, 陈浪南 2001 经济研究 47 61
Yang Z Y, Chen L N 2001 J. Econ. Res. 47 61
[5] Duan J C, Zhang H 2001 J. Bank Financ. 25 1989
Google Scholar
[6] 魏洁, 韩立岩 2016 数理统计与管理 33 550
Wei J, Han L Y 2016 J. Appl. Stat. Manag. 33 550
[7] 杨兴林, 王鹏 2018 数理统计与管理 37 162
Yang X L, Wang P 2018 J. Appl. Stat. Manag. 37 162
[8] Bailey W, Stulz R M 1989 J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 24 1
Google Scholar
[9] 谭朵朵 2008 统计与信息论坛 23 40
Google Scholar
Tan D D 2008 Stat. Inform. Forum 23 40
Google Scholar
[10] 韩立岩, 叶浩, 李伟 2012 中国管理科学 20 23
Han L Y, Ye H, Li W 2012 Chinese J. Manag. Sci. 20 23
[11] 樊鹏英, 陈敏 2014 价格理论与实践 34 96
Fan P Y, Chen M 2014 Price Theor. Pract. 34 96
[12] [13] Baaquie B E 1997 J. Phys. I 7 1733
[14] Linetsky V 1998 Computaitonal Ecomomics 11 129
Google Scholar
[15] Baaquie B E, Coriano C, Srikant M 2002 Quant. Financ. 15 333
[16] Baaquie B E 2004 Quantum Finance (Singapore: Cambridge University Press) pp78–116
[17] Baaquie B E, Corianò C, Srikant M 2004 Phys. A 334 531
Google Scholar
[18] Baaquie B E 2013 Comput. Math. Appl. 65 1665
Google Scholar
[19] Rosa-Clot M, Taddei S 1999 Quant. Financ. 5 123
[20] Kakushadze Z 2015 Quant. Financ. 15 1759
Google Scholar
[21] Issaka A, Sengupta I 2017 J. Appl. Math. Comput. 54 159
Google Scholar
[22] Ma C, Ma Q, Yao H, Hou T 2018 Phys. A 494 87
Google Scholar
[23] Paolinelli G, Arioli G 2018 Phys. A 517 499
[24] 陈泽乾 2003 数学物理学报 23 115
Google Scholar
Chen Z Q 2003 Acta Math. Sci. 23 115
Google Scholar
[25] 陈黎明, 邱菀华 2007 中国管理科学 15 12
Google Scholar
Chen L M, Qiu W H 2007 Chinese J. Manag. Sci. 15 12
Google Scholar
[26] 王鹏, 魏宇 2014 管理科学学报 17 40
Wang P, Wei Y 2014 J. Manag. Sci. China 17 40
[27] Heston S L 1993 Rev. Financ. Stud. 6 327
Google Scholar
[28] Scott L O 1987 J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 22 419
Google Scholar
[29] Merville L J, Pieptea D R 1989 J. Financ. Econ. 24 193
Google Scholar
[30] Stein E M, Stein J C 1991 Rev. Financ. Stud. 4 727
Google Scholar
[31] Cox J, Ingersoll J, Ross S 1985 Econometrica 53 385
Google Scholar
[32] 施里夫 S 著(陈启宏, 陈迪华 译) 2008 金融随机分析(上海: 上海财经大学出版社)第192—193页
Shreve S (translated by Chen Q H, Chen D H) 2008 Stochastic Calculus for Finance (Vol. 2) (Shanghai: Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Press) pp192–193 (in Chinese)
[33] 杨爱军, 蒋学军, 林金官, 刘晓星 2016 数理统计与管理 35 817
Google Scholar
Yang A J, Jiang X J, Lin J G, Liu X X 2016 J. Appl. Stat. Manag. 35 817
Google Scholar
[34] Durrett R 2016 Essentials of Stochastic Processes (New York: Springer) pp223–250
[35] Baaquie B E, Kwek L C, Srikant M 2000 arXiv: 0008327v1 [cond-mat] https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0008327 [2019-5-1]
-
图 1 EWMA模型得到的日方差图
Figure 1. Daily variance diagram from EWMA model
图 2 核密度图
Figure 2. Kernel density.
图 3 路径图
Figure 3. Path diagram.
图 4 实值期权(以K = 25200为例)
Figure 4. In-the-money option (K = 25200 as an example).
图 6 虚值期权(以K = 26400为例)
Figure 6. Out-of-the-money option (K = 26400 as an example).
图 7 到期日为2019年2月时两模型的平值期权价格对比图
Figure 7. A comparison of the two models with maturity date of February 2019
图 5 平值期权(K = 25800)
Figure 5. At-the-money option (K = 25800 as an example).
图 9 到期日为2019年6月时两模型的平值期权价格对比图
Figure 9. A comparison of the two models with maturity date of June 2019
图 8 到期日为2019年9月时两模型的平值期权价格对比图
Figure 8. A comparison of the two models with maturity date of September 2019.
图 10 相同到期日不同执行价格下两种模型的RMSE对比图
Figure 10. RMSE for the two models on the same due date.
图 11 相同到期日不同执行价格下两种模型的Theil不等系数对比图
Figure 11. Theil inequality coefficients for the two models on the same maturity date.
表 1 参数估计结果
Table 1. Parameter estimates.
Node Mean sd MC error Quantile Start Sample 2.50% 50% 97.50% α 3.393 0.1539 0.001499 3.082 3.395 3.685 4001 192000 ρ 0.4201 0.2032 0.007068 0.09408 0.4011 0.8774 4001 192000 ξ 1.574 0.07977 8.65 × 10–4 1.416 1.574 1.73 4001 192000 
DownLoad: CSV
表 2 K = 25800下两种模型不同到期日下的评价指标值
Table 2. K = 25800, the evaluation index values of the two models under different maturity dates.
到期日 RMSE Theil不等系数 费曼路径积分 Heston 费曼路径积分 Heston 2019年2月 113.1631 269.8452 0.0429 0.1138 2019年3月 118.0685 282.0939 0.0401 0.1037 2019年6月 94.7388 87.9670 0.0275 0.0259 2019年9月 88.4829 230.9288 0.0230 0.0584
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Pan J 2002 J. Financ. Ecno. 63 3
Google Scholar
[2] Eraker B, Johannes M, Polson N 2003 J. Financ. 58 1269
Google Scholar
[3] Broadie M, Chernov M, Johannes M 2007 J. Financ. 62 1453
Google Scholar
[4] 杨智元, 陈浪南 2001 经济研究 47 61
Yang Z Y, Chen L N 2001 J. Econ. Res. 47 61
[5] Duan J C, Zhang H 2001 J. Bank Financ. 25 1989
Google Scholar
[6] 魏洁, 韩立岩 2016 数理统计与管理 33 550
Wei J, Han L Y 2016 J. Appl. Stat. Manag. 33 550
[7] 杨兴林, 王鹏 2018 数理统计与管理 37 162
Yang X L, Wang P 2018 J. Appl. Stat. Manag. 37 162
[8] Bailey W, Stulz R M 1989 J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 24 1
Google Scholar
[9] 谭朵朵 2008 统计与信息论坛 23 40
Google Scholar
Tan D D 2008 Stat. Inform. Forum 23 40
Google Scholar
[10] 韩立岩, 叶浩, 李伟 2012 中国管理科学 20 23
Han L Y, Ye H, Li W 2012 Chinese J. Manag. Sci. 20 23
[11] 樊鹏英, 陈敏 2014 价格理论与实践 34 96
Fan P Y, Chen M 2014 Price Theor. Pract. 34 96
[12] [13] Baaquie B E 1997 J. Phys. I 7 1733
[14] Linetsky V 1998 Computaitonal Ecomomics 11 129
Google Scholar
[15] Baaquie B E, Coriano C, Srikant M 2002 Quant. Financ. 15 333
[16] Baaquie B E 2004 Quantum Finance (Singapore: Cambridge University Press) pp78–116
[17] Baaquie B E, Corianò C, Srikant M 2004 Phys. A 334 531
Google Scholar
[18] Baaquie B E 2013 Comput. Math. Appl. 65 1665
Google Scholar
[19] Rosa-Clot M, Taddei S 1999 Quant. Financ. 5 123
[20] Kakushadze Z 2015 Quant. Financ. 15 1759
Google Scholar
[21] Issaka A, Sengupta I 2017 J. Appl. Math. Comput. 54 159
Google Scholar
[22] Ma C, Ma Q, Yao H, Hou T 2018 Phys. A 494 87
Google Scholar
[23] Paolinelli G, Arioli G 2018 Phys. A 517 499
[24] 陈泽乾 2003 数学物理学报 23 115
Google Scholar
Chen Z Q 2003 Acta Math. Sci. 23 115
Google Scholar
[25] 陈黎明, 邱菀华 2007 中国管理科学 15 12
Google Scholar
Chen L M, Qiu W H 2007 Chinese J. Manag. Sci. 15 12
Google Scholar
[26] 王鹏, 魏宇 2014 管理科学学报 17 40
Wang P, Wei Y 2014 J. Manag. Sci. China 17 40
[27] Heston S L 1993 Rev. Financ. Stud. 6 327
Google Scholar
[28] Scott L O 1987 J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 22 419
Google Scholar
[29] Merville L J, Pieptea D R 1989 J. Financ. Econ. 24 193
Google Scholar
[30] Stein E M, Stein J C 1991 Rev. Financ. Stud. 4 727
Google Scholar
[31] Cox J, Ingersoll J, Ross S 1985 Econometrica 53 385
Google Scholar
[32] 施里夫 S 著(陈启宏, 陈迪华 译) 2008 金融随机分析(上海: 上海财经大学出版社)第192—193页
Shreve S (translated by Chen Q H, Chen D H) 2008 Stochastic Calculus for Finance (Vol. 2) (Shanghai: Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Press) pp192–193 (in Chinese)
[33] 杨爱军, 蒋学军, 林金官, 刘晓星 2016 数理统计与管理 35 817
Google Scholar
Yang A J, Jiang X J, Lin J G, Liu X X 2016 J. Appl. Stat. Manag. 35 817
Google Scholar
[34] Durrett R 2016 Essentials of Stochastic Processes (New York: Springer) pp223–250
[35] Baaquie B E, Kwek L C, Srikant M 2000 arXiv: 0008327v1 [cond-mat] https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0008327 [2019-5-1]
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 8189
- PDF Downloads: 83
- Cited By: 0
