-
The effects of mesoporous size and structure on the solidification characteristics of solar salt are simulated by molecular dynamics (MD). The mixed nitrate model with different scales and two structures is established by using Material Studio software, and the model is applied to the Lammps software package for simulation calculation. The changes of freezing point, supercooling, and phase transformation latent heat are summarized. The micro mechanism of solidification characteristics of nano solar salt is analyzed by radial distribution function, potential energy temperature curve and Gibbs free energy theory. The results show that the freezing point of solar salt first increases and then decreases with the increase of nanopore scale. The nanowire structure will also increase the phase transition temperature on the same scale, and the phase transition points of the two eventually tend to be stable with the increase of scale. The supercooling of solar salt decreases with the increase of mesoporous scale, but there is an abnormal increase. Under the two different structures, the solidification enthalpy gradually decreases with the increase of scale, and the phase transition latent heat of nanowire solar salt is 30%–37% higher than that of nanoparticle structure on the same scale.
-
Keywords:
- solar salt /
- scale /
- supercooling /
- solidification characteristics
[1] Jiang Z, Leng G, Ye F, Ge Z, Liu C, Wang L 2015 Energy Convers. Manage. 106 165Google Scholar
[2] Alehosseini E, Jafari S. M. 2019 Trends Food Sci. Tech. 91 116Google Scholar
[3] Umair M M, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Tang B 2019 Applied Energy 235 846Google Scholar
[4] Chen X, Gao H, Yang M, Xing L, Dong W, Li A 2019 Energy Storage Mater. 18 349Google Scholar
[5] 冯妍卉, 冯黛丽, 张欣欣 2019 介孔复合材料的相变及热输运特性 (北京: 科学出版社) 第110—113页
Feng Y H, Feng D L, Zhang X X 2019 Phase Transition and Heat Transport Properties of Mesoporous Composites (Beijing: Science Press) pp110–113 (in Chinese)
[6] Chen X, Tang Z, Chang Y, Gao H, Lv J 2020 iScience 23 101606Google Scholar
[7] Qian T T, Li J H, Xin M, Fan B 2018 ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6 897Google Scholar
[8] Xiao, C, Hg A, Lx A, Wd A, Al A, Pc B 2019 Energy Storage Mater. 18 280Google Scholar
[9] Huang, X, Liu Z, Xia W, Zou R, Han R P S 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 3 1935Google Scholar
[10] 袁思伟, 冯妍卉, 王鑫, 张欣欣 2014 物理学报 63 014402Google Scholar
Yuan S W, Feng Y H, Wang X, Zhang X X 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 014402Google Scholar
[11] Feng D, Feng Y, Qiu L, Li P, Zang Y, Zou H 2019 Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 109 578Google Scholar
[12] Lewis L J, Jensen P, Barrat J L 1997 Mrs Proceedings 56.4 2248-2257Google Scholar
[13] 毋志民, 王新强 2006 原子与分子物理学报 23 167Google Scholar
Wu Z M, Wang X Q 2006 Journal of Atomic and Molecular Physics 23 167Google Scholar
[14] Alavi S, Thompson D L 2006 J. Phys. Chem. A 110 1518Google Scholar
[15] Kang J W, Hwang H J 2003 Comp. Mater. Sci. 27 305Google Scholar
[16] Wen Y H, Zhu Z Z, Zhu R, Shao G F 2005 Physica E: Low-Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 25 47
[17] Goitandia A M, Beobide G, Aranzabe E, Aranzabe A 2015 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 134 318Google Scholar
[18] Nakano K, Masuda Y, Daiguji H 2015 J. Phys. Chem. C 119 4769Google Scholar
[19] Zou T, X Liang, Wang S, Gao X, Fang, Y 2020 Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 305 110403Google Scholar
[20] Zhang P, Xiao X, Ma Z W 2016 Appl. Energy 165 472Google Scholar
[21] 赵亚溥 2012 表面与界面物理力学 (北京: 科学出版社) 第212—220页
Zhao Y P 2012 Physical Mechanics of Surfaces and Interfaces (Beijing: Science Press) pp212–220 (in Chinese)
[22] 何卓亚, 杨启容, 李昭莹, 毛蕊, 王力伟, 闫晨宣 2022 物理学报 71 030503Google Scholar
He Z Y, Yang Q R, Li Z Y, Mao R, Wang L W, Yan C X 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 030503Google Scholar
[23] Anagnostopoulos A, Alexiadis A, Ding Y 2019 Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. C 200 109897
[24] Hu G J, Cao B Y 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 96Google Scholar
[25] 吴晨光, 李蓓 2022 复合材料学报 32 1Google Scholar
[26] Karasawa N, Goddard WA 1992 Macromolecules 25 7268Google Scholar
[27] Pan G, Ding J, Wang W L 2016 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 103 417Google Scholar
[28] Sheppard D, Terrell R, Henkelman G 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 385Google Scholar
[29] Zhang C, Chen Y, Yang L, Shi M 2011 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 54 4770Google Scholar
[30] Li P T, Yang Y Q, Zhang W, Luo X, Jin N, Liu G 2016 RSC Advances 6 54763Google Scholar
[31] 李昌, 侯兆阳, 牛媛, 高全华, 王真, 王晋国, 邹鹏飞 2022 物理学报 71 016101Google Scholar
Li C, Hou Z Y, Niu Y, Gao Q H, Wang Z, Wang J G, Zou P F 2022 Acta Phys. Sin 71 016101Google Scholar
[32] Nicole P, Thomas B, Claudia M, Markus E, Antje W 2015 Beilstein J. Nanotech. 6 1487Google Scholar
[33] Danneman D M, Johansen J B, Furbo S 2016 Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. C. 145 287Google Scholar
[34] Kibria M A, Anisur M R, Mahfuz M H, Saidur R, Metselaar I 2015 Energy Convers. Manage. 95 69Google Scholar
[35] Al-Shannaq R, Kurdi J, Al-Muhtaseb S, Dickinson M, Farid M 2015 Energy 87 654
[36] Song Z, Deng Y, Li J, Nian H 2018 Mater. Res. Bull. 102 203Google Scholar
[37] Cao F, Bao Y 2014 Appl. Energy 113 1512Google Scholar
[38] Fang G, Hui L, Fan Y, Xu L, Wu S 2009 Chem. Eng. J. 153 217Google Scholar
[39] Wei L L, Kenichi, Ohsasa 2010 ISIJ Int. 50 1265Google Scholar
[40] Sun J, Simon S L 2007 Thermochim. Acta 463 32Google Scholar
[41] Wang W, Zhong Y, Li D, Wang P, Cai Y, Duan Z 2015 J. Electr. Mater. 44 4920Google Scholar
[42] Saranprabhu M K, Rajan K S 2019 Renew. Energy 141 451Google Scholar
[43] Pan K, Li Y, Zhao Q, Zhang S 2018 JOM 71 737Google Scholar
[44] Li Y 2018 Ph. D. Dissertation (Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University) (in Chinese) [李扬 2018 博士学位论文 (郑州: 郑州大学)]
[45] Eryürek M, Güven 2007 Physica A:Stat. Mech. Appl. 377 514Google Scholar
-
图 10 势能-温度曲线 (a) 460分子数升降温曲线; (b) 不同尺度纳米粒子降温曲线; (c) 不同尺度纳米线降温曲线; (d) 不同结构降温曲线
Figure 10. Potential energy-temperature curve: (a) 460 molecular number rise and drop temperature curve; (b) cooling curves of nanoparticles with different scales; (c) cooling curves of nanowires with different scales; (d) cooling curves of different structures
表 1 太阳盐(w (NaNO3)∶w (KNO3) = 6∶4)中NaNO3和KNO3的离子数[22]
Table 1. Ion numbers of NaNO3 and KNO3 in solar salts (w (NaNO3) : w (KNO3) = 6∶4)[22]
离子数 种类 尺度/nm Na+ K+ N– O2– 460 60 32 92 276 5 920 120 64 184 552 6—7 1380 180 96 276 828 7—8 1840 240 128 368 1104 8 2300 300 160 460 1380 9—10 2760 360 192 552 1656 10 Atom Q/e E/(10–3 eV) σ/Å Na 1.00 6.6373000 2.407 K 1.00 4.336000 3.188 N 0.95 4.017509 3.431 O –0.65 3.469129 3.285 表 3 模拟参数
Table 3. Simulation parameters.
原子数 460, 920, 1380, 1840, 2300, 2760 时间步长/fs 1 压强/(105 Pa) 1 系综 NPT 冷却速率/(K·ps–1) 0.1, 0.5 表 4 不同尺度下的太阳盐的相变温度
Table 4. Phase transition temperature of solar salts at different scales.
离子数 460 920 1380 1840 2300 2760 5520 11040 熔点/K 493 493 503 518 508 492 493 492 凝固点/K 463 483 473 503 490 483 478 476 过冷度/K 30 10 30 15 12 9 15 16 表 5 纳米线结构太阳盐的相变温度
Table 5. Phase transition temperature of nanostructured solar salts
离子数 460 920 熔点/K 528 548 凝固点/K 518 543 过冷度/K 10 5 表 6 不同尺度下的太阳盐的相变潜热
Table 6. Phase transition latent heat of solar salts at different scales.
离子数 460 920 1380 1840 2300 2760 相变潜热
/(kJ·kg–1)108.75 109.39 110.12 112.25 114.69 117.57 表 7 纳米线结构太阳盐的相变潜热
Table 7. Phase transition latent heat of nanostructured solar salts.
离子数 460 920 相变潜热/(kJ·kg–1) 141.39 150.64 -
[1] Jiang Z, Leng G, Ye F, Ge Z, Liu C, Wang L 2015 Energy Convers. Manage. 106 165Google Scholar
[2] Alehosseini E, Jafari S. M. 2019 Trends Food Sci. Tech. 91 116Google Scholar
[3] Umair M M, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Tang B 2019 Applied Energy 235 846Google Scholar
[4] Chen X, Gao H, Yang M, Xing L, Dong W, Li A 2019 Energy Storage Mater. 18 349Google Scholar
[5] 冯妍卉, 冯黛丽, 张欣欣 2019 介孔复合材料的相变及热输运特性 (北京: 科学出版社) 第110—113页
Feng Y H, Feng D L, Zhang X X 2019 Phase Transition and Heat Transport Properties of Mesoporous Composites (Beijing: Science Press) pp110–113 (in Chinese)
[6] Chen X, Tang Z, Chang Y, Gao H, Lv J 2020 iScience 23 101606Google Scholar
[7] Qian T T, Li J H, Xin M, Fan B 2018 ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6 897Google Scholar
[8] Xiao, C, Hg A, Lx A, Wd A, Al A, Pc B 2019 Energy Storage Mater. 18 280Google Scholar
[9] Huang, X, Liu Z, Xia W, Zou R, Han R P S 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 3 1935Google Scholar
[10] 袁思伟, 冯妍卉, 王鑫, 张欣欣 2014 物理学报 63 014402Google Scholar
Yuan S W, Feng Y H, Wang X, Zhang X X 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 014402Google Scholar
[11] Feng D, Feng Y, Qiu L, Li P, Zang Y, Zou H 2019 Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 109 578Google Scholar
[12] Lewis L J, Jensen P, Barrat J L 1997 Mrs Proceedings 56.4 2248-2257Google Scholar
[13] 毋志民, 王新强 2006 原子与分子物理学报 23 167Google Scholar
Wu Z M, Wang X Q 2006 Journal of Atomic and Molecular Physics 23 167Google Scholar
[14] Alavi S, Thompson D L 2006 J. Phys. Chem. A 110 1518Google Scholar
[15] Kang J W, Hwang H J 2003 Comp. Mater. Sci. 27 305Google Scholar
[16] Wen Y H, Zhu Z Z, Zhu R, Shao G F 2005 Physica E: Low-Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 25 47
[17] Goitandia A M, Beobide G, Aranzabe E, Aranzabe A 2015 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 134 318Google Scholar
[18] Nakano K, Masuda Y, Daiguji H 2015 J. Phys. Chem. C 119 4769Google Scholar
[19] Zou T, X Liang, Wang S, Gao X, Fang, Y 2020 Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 305 110403Google Scholar
[20] Zhang P, Xiao X, Ma Z W 2016 Appl. Energy 165 472Google Scholar
[21] 赵亚溥 2012 表面与界面物理力学 (北京: 科学出版社) 第212—220页
Zhao Y P 2012 Physical Mechanics of Surfaces and Interfaces (Beijing: Science Press) pp212–220 (in Chinese)
[22] 何卓亚, 杨启容, 李昭莹, 毛蕊, 王力伟, 闫晨宣 2022 物理学报 71 030503Google Scholar
He Z Y, Yang Q R, Li Z Y, Mao R, Wang L W, Yan C X 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 030503Google Scholar
[23] Anagnostopoulos A, Alexiadis A, Ding Y 2019 Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. C 200 109897
[24] Hu G J, Cao B Y 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 96Google Scholar
[25] 吴晨光, 李蓓 2022 复合材料学报 32 1Google Scholar
[26] Karasawa N, Goddard WA 1992 Macromolecules 25 7268Google Scholar
[27] Pan G, Ding J, Wang W L 2016 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 103 417Google Scholar
[28] Sheppard D, Terrell R, Henkelman G 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 385Google Scholar
[29] Zhang C, Chen Y, Yang L, Shi M 2011 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 54 4770Google Scholar
[30] Li P T, Yang Y Q, Zhang W, Luo X, Jin N, Liu G 2016 RSC Advances 6 54763Google Scholar
[31] 李昌, 侯兆阳, 牛媛, 高全华, 王真, 王晋国, 邹鹏飞 2022 物理学报 71 016101Google Scholar
Li C, Hou Z Y, Niu Y, Gao Q H, Wang Z, Wang J G, Zou P F 2022 Acta Phys. Sin 71 016101Google Scholar
[32] Nicole P, Thomas B, Claudia M, Markus E, Antje W 2015 Beilstein J. Nanotech. 6 1487Google Scholar
[33] Danneman D M, Johansen J B, Furbo S 2016 Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. C. 145 287Google Scholar
[34] Kibria M A, Anisur M R, Mahfuz M H, Saidur R, Metselaar I 2015 Energy Convers. Manage. 95 69Google Scholar
[35] Al-Shannaq R, Kurdi J, Al-Muhtaseb S, Dickinson M, Farid M 2015 Energy 87 654
[36] Song Z, Deng Y, Li J, Nian H 2018 Mater. Res. Bull. 102 203Google Scholar
[37] Cao F, Bao Y 2014 Appl. Energy 113 1512Google Scholar
[38] Fang G, Hui L, Fan Y, Xu L, Wu S 2009 Chem. Eng. J. 153 217Google Scholar
[39] Wei L L, Kenichi, Ohsasa 2010 ISIJ Int. 50 1265Google Scholar
[40] Sun J, Simon S L 2007 Thermochim. Acta 463 32Google Scholar
[41] Wang W, Zhong Y, Li D, Wang P, Cai Y, Duan Z 2015 J. Electr. Mater. 44 4920Google Scholar
[42] Saranprabhu M K, Rajan K S 2019 Renew. Energy 141 451Google Scholar
[43] Pan K, Li Y, Zhao Q, Zhang S 2018 JOM 71 737Google Scholar
[44] Li Y 2018 Ph. D. Dissertation (Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University) (in Chinese) [李扬 2018 博士学位论文 (郑州: 郑州大学)]
[45] Eryürek M, Güven 2007 Physica A:Stat. Mech. Appl. 377 514Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4998
- PDF Downloads: 60
- Cited By: 0