-
Mixing between shell material and gas fuel, caused by hydrodynamic instability, isolated defects, or kinetic effects, is the key to understand the degradation of implosion performance in the research of inertial confinement fusion. Understanding the mixing mechanism and reducing its impact is of extreme importance to achieve the ignition and high gain. The impact of mixing morphology on thermonuclear reaction rate in sub grid level has gradually attracted people’s attention in recent years due to its direct influence on burn rate and fusion process, the study on physical model of thermonuclear reaction rate in different mix morphology has important scientific significance and application value. In the paper, the dependence of thermonuclear reaction rate on mass distribution of different fuel concentrations at sub grid scale is derived. Based on thermodynamic equilibrium and ideal gas equation of state, the physical law of the evolution of the thermonuclear reaction rate with mix morphology under the dominance of diffusion mixing is revealed through analytical formula and numerical solution of diffusion equation in one-dimensional spherical geometry. It is convinced that the mixing amount directly affects the thermonuclear reaction rate by mainly affecting the volume fraction of the fuel, and the mixing diffusion time determined by heterogeneous mixing scale and diffusion coefficient directly affects the evolution behavior of the thermonuclear reaction rate. Furthermore, based on mutual diffusion coefficient obtained from direct simulation of diffusion process by Monte Carlo method, the difference of impact to thermonuclear reaction rate for low-Z Carbon and high-Z gold mixing is quantitatively investigated. Heterogeneous mix size with 0.1 μm, 0.01 μm respectively for the low-Z and high-Z mixing can be treated as atomic mix in burn rate aspect, and heterogeneous mix size with 10 μm, 1 μm respectively for the low-Z and high-Z mixing can be treated as ideal chunk mix in burn rate aspect, and heterogeneous mix size in the middle state needs to be evaluated by using the heterogeneous mixing model of thermonuclear reaction rate in the paper. Finally, the physical model is compared with 3D simulation results of the heterogeneous mixing effect experiment called “MARBLE Campaign” carried out on OMEGA laser facility, which is designed as a separated reactant experiments and capsules are filled with deuterated foam and HT gas pores of different size, covering typical mix morphology from atomic mix to chunk mix, which validate the reliability of the theoretical evaluation about the evolution of mixing morphology and its impact to thermonuclear reaction rate. This work is significant for the design and improvement of inertial confinement fusion mixing effect experiment in China.
-
Keywords:
- mix morphology /
- heterogeneous mix /
- thermonuclear reaction rate /
- mutual diffusion coefficient
[1] Cabot W H, Cook A W 2006 Nat. Phys. 2 562
Google Scholar
[2] Zhou Y 2017 Phys. Rep. 720-722 1
Google Scholar
[3] Zhou Y 2017 Phys. Rep. 723-725 1
Google Scholar
[4] Orth C D 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 022706
Google Scholar
[5] Weber C R, Clark D S, Pak A, Alfonso N, Bachmann B, Hopkins L F B, Bunn T, Crippen J, Divol L, Dittrich T, Kritcher A L, Landen O L, Le Pape B S, MacPhee A G, Marley E, Masse L P, Milovich J L, Nikroo A, Patel P K, Pickworth L A, Rice N, Smalyuk V A, Stadermann M 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 032703
Google Scholar
[6] Hammel B A, Tommasini R, Clark D S, Field J, Stadermann M, Weber C 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 717 012021
Google Scholar
[7] Murphy T J, Douglas M R, Fincke J R, Olson R E, Cobble J A, Haines B M, Hamilton C E, Lee M N, Oertel J A, Parra-Vasquez N A G, Randolph R B, Schmidt D W, Shah R C, Smidt J M, Tregillis I L 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 717 012072
Google Scholar
[8] Murphy T J, Albright B J, Douglas M R, Cardenas T, Cooley J H, Day T H, Denissen N A, Gore R A, Gunderson M A, Haack J R, Haines B M, Hamilton C E, Hartouni E P, Kim Y, Kozlowski P M, Lee M N, Oertel J A, Olson R E, Yin L 2021 High Energy Density Phys. 38 100929
Google Scholar
[9] Haines B M, Shah R C, Smidt J M, Albright B J, Cardenas T, Douglas M R, Forrest C, Glebov V Y, Gunderson M A, Hamilton C E, Henderson K C, Kim Y, Lee M N, Murphy T J, Oertel J A, Olson R E, Patterson B M, Randolph R B, Schmidt D W 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 544
Google Scholar
[10] Haines B M, Shah R C, Smidt J M, Albright B J, Cardenas T, Douglas M R, Forrest C, Glebov V Y, Gunderson M A, Hamilton C, Henderson K, Kim Y, Lee M N, Murphy T J, Oertel J A, Olson R E, Patterson B M, Randolph R B, Schmidt D 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 102701
Google Scholar
[11] Moses E I, Atherton J, Lagin L, Larson D, Keane C, MacGowan B, Patterson R, Spaeth M, Van Wonterghem B, Wegner P, Kauffman R 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 688 012073
Google Scholar
[12] Boehly T R, Brown D L, Craxton R S, Keck R L, Knauer J P, Kelly J H, Kessler T J, Kumpan S A, Bucks S J, Letzring S A, Marshall F J, McCrory R L, Morse S F B, Seka W, Soures J M, Verdon C P 1997 Opt. Commun. 133 495
Google Scholar
[13] Pu Y D, Luo X, Zhang L, Sun C K, Hu Z M, Shen G, Wang X R, Tang Q, Yuan Z, Wang F, Yang D, Yang J M, Jiang S E, Ding Y K, Wang J G 2020 Phys. Rev. E 102 023204
Google Scholar
[14] Peng H, Zhang X M, Wei X, Zheng W, Jing F, Sui Z, Fan D, Lin Z 1999 Proc. SPIE 3492 25
[15] Ristorcelli J R 2017 Phys. Fluids 29 020705
Google Scholar
[16] Cook A W, Riley J J 1994 Phys. Fluids 6 2868
Google Scholar
[17] Dimotakis P E 2005 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37 329
Google Scholar
[18] Girimaji S S 1991 Combust. Sci. Tech. 78 177
Google Scholar
[19] Ticknor C, Kress J D, Collins L A, Clérouin J, Arnault P, Decoster A 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 063208
Google Scholar
[20] Molvig K, Simakov A N, Vold E L 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 092709
Google Scholar
[21] Stanton L G, Murillo M S 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 043203
Google Scholar
[22] White A J, Ticknor C, Meyer E R, Kress J D, Collins L A 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 033213
Google Scholar
[23] 查普曼 L, 考林 T G 著 (刘大有, 王伯懿 译) 1970 非均匀气体的数学理论 (北京: 科学出版社) 第137—139页
Chapman S, Cowling T G (translated by Liu D Y, Wang B Y) 1970 The Mathematical Theory of Non-uniform Gases (Beijing: Science Press) pp137–139 (in Chinese)
[24] Brueckner K A, Jorna S 1974 Rev. Mod. Phys. 46 325
Google Scholar
-
图 1 不同混合形态下聚变燃料质量分布函数
$ m(c) $ 的示意图 (a) 理想“颗粒”混合; (b) 非均匀混合; (c)均匀原子混合Figure 1. Schematic diagram of fusion fuel mass distribution function
$ m(c) $ under different mix morphology: (a) Ideal chunk mix; (b) heterogeneous mix; (c) homogeneous atomic mix
图 2 不同参数β函数分布的m(c)及相应的热核反应速率修正因子 (a) 不同参数下的β函数分布; (b)相应修正因子η
Figure 2. m(c) taken as the distribution of β function with different parameters and corresponding correction factor of thermonuclear reaction rate: (a) β function distribution with different parameter; (b) corresponding η
图 3 “颗粒”+氘氚小球系统互扩散过程示意图
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of mutual diffusion process of chunk+DT system
图 4 热核反应速率修正因子数值解与解析解的比较
Figure 4. Comparison of numerical and analytical solutions for the correction factor of thermonuclear reaction rate
图 5 跟踪样本离子扩散过程的示意图
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of tracking ion diffusion process
图 6 蒙卡模拟的离子数密度分布随时间演化行为与扩散方程数值解的比较 (数值解的扩散系数为2243
$ {\rm{cm}}^2/{\rm{s}} $ , 到心时间为0.9 ns)Figure 6. Comparison between time evolution of ion number density distribution simulated by MC and numerical solution of diffusion equation. (diffusion coefficient of numerical solution is 2243
$ {\rm{cm}}^2/{\rm{s}} $ , time of diffusion to center is 0.9 ns)
图 7 蒙卡模拟给出的氘自扩散系数与动理学理论的比较 (a) 随数密度的变化; (b) 随温度的变化
Figure 7. Comparison between self diffusion coefficient of deuterium given by MC simulation and kinectic theory: (a) With number density; (b) with temperature
图 8 蒙卡模拟给出的互扩散系数与动理学公式的比较 (a) 氘与碳; (b) 氘与金
Figure 8. Comparison of the mutual diffusion coefficient between MC simulation and kinetic theories: (a) Carbon and deuterium; (b) gold and deuterium
图 9 扩散混合下热核反应速率修正因子时间演化与平均燃料浓度的关系
Figure 9. Time evolution of thermonuclear reaction rate correction factor with different average fuel concentration under diffusion mixing
图 10 热核反应速率修正因子时间演化与颗粒尺度的关系(取燃料平均浓度0.5, 扩散系数100
$ {\rm{cm}}^2/{\rm{s}} $ )Figure 10. Time evolution of thermonuclear reaction rate correction factor with different chunk size under diffusion mixing
图 11 颗粒尺度概率密度分布及不同分布下热核反应速率修正因子时间演化的差异
Figure 11. Time evolution of thermonuclear reaction rate correction factor with different chunk size distribution under diffusion mixing
图 12 金颗粒 + 氘、碳颗粒 + 氘的热核反应速率修正因子时间演化的比较
Figure 12. Comparison of rate correction factors for gold + deuterium system and carbon + deuterium system
-
[1] Cabot W H, Cook A W 2006 Nat. Phys. 2 562
Google Scholar
[2] Zhou Y 2017 Phys. Rep. 720-722 1
Google Scholar
[3] Zhou Y 2017 Phys. Rep. 723-725 1
Google Scholar
[4] Orth C D 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 022706
Google Scholar
[5] Weber C R, Clark D S, Pak A, Alfonso N, Bachmann B, Hopkins L F B, Bunn T, Crippen J, Divol L, Dittrich T, Kritcher A L, Landen O L, Le Pape B S, MacPhee A G, Marley E, Masse L P, Milovich J L, Nikroo A, Patel P K, Pickworth L A, Rice N, Smalyuk V A, Stadermann M 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 032703
Google Scholar
[6] Hammel B A, Tommasini R, Clark D S, Field J, Stadermann M, Weber C 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 717 012021
Google Scholar
[7] Murphy T J, Douglas M R, Fincke J R, Olson R E, Cobble J A, Haines B M, Hamilton C E, Lee M N, Oertel J A, Parra-Vasquez N A G, Randolph R B, Schmidt D W, Shah R C, Smidt J M, Tregillis I L 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 717 012072
Google Scholar
[8] Murphy T J, Albright B J, Douglas M R, Cardenas T, Cooley J H, Day T H, Denissen N A, Gore R A, Gunderson M A, Haack J R, Haines B M, Hamilton C E, Hartouni E P, Kim Y, Kozlowski P M, Lee M N, Oertel J A, Olson R E, Yin L 2021 High Energy Density Phys. 38 100929
Google Scholar
[9] Haines B M, Shah R C, Smidt J M, Albright B J, Cardenas T, Douglas M R, Forrest C, Glebov V Y, Gunderson M A, Hamilton C E, Henderson K C, Kim Y, Lee M N, Murphy T J, Oertel J A, Olson R E, Patterson B M, Randolph R B, Schmidt D W 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 544
Google Scholar
[10] Haines B M, Shah R C, Smidt J M, Albright B J, Cardenas T, Douglas M R, Forrest C, Glebov V Y, Gunderson M A, Hamilton C, Henderson K, Kim Y, Lee M N, Murphy T J, Oertel J A, Olson R E, Patterson B M, Randolph R B, Schmidt D 2020 Phys. Plasmas 27 102701
Google Scholar
[11] Moses E I, Atherton J, Lagin L, Larson D, Keane C, MacGowan B, Patterson R, Spaeth M, Van Wonterghem B, Wegner P, Kauffman R 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 688 012073
Google Scholar
[12] Boehly T R, Brown D L, Craxton R S, Keck R L, Knauer J P, Kelly J H, Kessler T J, Kumpan S A, Bucks S J, Letzring S A, Marshall F J, McCrory R L, Morse S F B, Seka W, Soures J M, Verdon C P 1997 Opt. Commun. 133 495
Google Scholar
[13] Pu Y D, Luo X, Zhang L, Sun C K, Hu Z M, Shen G, Wang X R, Tang Q, Yuan Z, Wang F, Yang D, Yang J M, Jiang S E, Ding Y K, Wang J G 2020 Phys. Rev. E 102 023204
Google Scholar
[14] Peng H, Zhang X M, Wei X, Zheng W, Jing F, Sui Z, Fan D, Lin Z 1999 Proc. SPIE 3492 25
[15] Ristorcelli J R 2017 Phys. Fluids 29 020705
Google Scholar
[16] Cook A W, Riley J J 1994 Phys. Fluids 6 2868
Google Scholar
[17] Dimotakis P E 2005 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37 329
Google Scholar
[18] Girimaji S S 1991 Combust. Sci. Tech. 78 177
Google Scholar
[19] Ticknor C, Kress J D, Collins L A, Clérouin J, Arnault P, Decoster A 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 063208
Google Scholar
[20] Molvig K, Simakov A N, Vold E L 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 092709
Google Scholar
[21] Stanton L G, Murillo M S 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 043203
Google Scholar
[22] White A J, Ticknor C, Meyer E R, Kress J D, Collins L A 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 033213
Google Scholar
[23] 查普曼 L, 考林 T G 著 (刘大有, 王伯懿 译) 1970 非均匀气体的数学理论 (北京: 科学出版社) 第137—139页
Chapman S, Cowling T G (translated by Liu D Y, Wang B Y) 1970 The Mathematical Theory of Non-uniform Gases (Beijing: Science Press) pp137–139 (in Chinese)
[24] Brueckner K A, Jorna S 1974 Rev. Mod. Phys. 46 325
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 3395
- PDF Downloads: 68
- Cited By: 0
