-
Avalanche photodiodes are widely used in various fields, such as optical communication and laser radar, because of their high multiplication. In order to adapt to very weak signal detection applications, devices are required to have higher gain values. The existing avalanche photodiodes generally use single carrier multiplication mode of operation, its multiplication effect is limited. In this paper is designed an InP/In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As avalanche photodiode structure with electrons and holes jointly involved in multiplication. In this structure, In0.53Ga0.47As material is used for the absorption layer, InP material is used for the hole multiplication layer, In0.52Al0.48As is used for the electron multiplication layer, and the two multiplication layers are distributed on the upper side and lower side of the absorber layer. Under the reverse bias, the photogenerated electrons and the absorber-layer generated holes can enter into the respective multiplier layers in different directions and create the avalanche multiplication effect, so that the carriers are fully utilized. This structure and the conventional single multiplication layer structure are simulated by Silvaco TCAD software. Comparing the single InP multiplication layer structure with the single In0.52Al0.48As multiplication layer structure, the gain value of the double multiplication layer structure at 95% breakdown voltage is about 2.3 times and about 2 times of the former two, respectively, and the device has a larger gain value because both carriers are involved in multiplication in both multiplication layers at the same time. The structure has a dark current of 1.5 nA at 95% breakdown voltage, which does not increase in comparison with the single multiplication layer structure, owing to the effective control of the electric field inside the structure by multiple charge layers. Therefore, this structure is expected to improve the detection sensitivity of the system.
-
Keywords:
- avalanche photodiode /
- weak signal /
- dual carrier multiplication /
- gain
[1] Mccarthy A, Ren X, Della F A, Gemmell N R, Krichel N J, Scarcella C, Rugger A, Tosi A, Buller G S 2013 Opt. Express 21 22098Google Scholar
[2] Bertone N, Clark W 2007 Laser Focus World 43 69
[3] Mitra P, Beck J D, Skokan M R, Skokan M R, Robinson J E, Antoszewski J, Winchester K J, Keating A J, Nguyen T, Silva K, Musca C A, Dell J M, Faraone L 2006 SPIE Defense Commercial Sensing Orlando, United States, April 14–19, 2006 p70
[4] Tosi A, Calandri N, Sanzaro M, Acerbi F 2014 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. 20 192Google Scholar
[5] Jiang X, Itzler M, O’Donnell K, Entwistle M, Owens M, Slomkowski K, Rangwala S S 2014 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. 21 5Google Scholar
[6] Lee C, Johnson B, Molnar A C 2015 App. Phys. Lett. 106 231105Google Scholar
[7] Nishida K, Taguchi K, Matsumoto Y 1979 App. Phys. Lett. 35 251Google Scholar
[8] Li J, Dehzangi A, Brown G J, Razeghi M 2021 Sci. Rep. 11 7104Google Scholar
[9] Tarof L E 1990 IEEE Photonic. Tech. L. 2 643Google Scholar
[10] Campbell J C, Dentai A G, Holden W S, Kasper B L 1983 Electron. Lett. 19 818Google Scholar
[11] Matsushima Y, Akiba S, Sakai K, Kushiro Y, Noda Y, Utaka K 1982 Electron. Lett. 22 945Google Scholar
[12] Capasso F, Cho A Y, Foy P W 1984 Electron. Lett. 20 635Google Scholar
[13] Forrest S R, Kim O K, Smith R G 1982 App. Phys. Lett. 41 95Google Scholar
[14] Ma C, Deen M J, Tarof L E 1995 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 42 2070Google Scholar
[15] Emmons R B 1967 J. Appl. Phys. 38 3705Google Scholar
[16] Mcintyre R J 1966 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 13 164Google Scholar
[17] 曾巧玉 2014 博士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学院大学)
Zeng Q Y 2014 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
[18] 吕粤希 2018 硕士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学院大学)
Lü Y X 2018 M. S. Thesis (Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
[19] Cook L W, Bulman G E, Stillman G E 1982 App. Phys. Lett. 40 589Google Scholar
[20] Goh Y L, Massey D, Marshall A R, Ng J S, Tan C H, Ng W K, Rees G J, Hopkinson M, David J P, Jones S 2007 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 54 11Google Scholar
[21] Capasso F, Mohammed K, Alavi K, Cho A Y, Foy P W 1984 App. Phys. Lett. 45 968Google Scholar
[22] Melchior H, Hartman A R, Schinke D P, Seidel T E 1978 Bell Syst. Tech. J. 57 1791Google Scholar
[23] Li X, Bamiedakis N, Wei J L, Penty R V, White I H 2014 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)—Laser Science to Photonic Applications San Jose, United States, June 8–13, 2014 p1
[24] Campbell J C 2004 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. 10 777Google Scholar
[25] Miller S L 1955 Phys. Rev. 99 1234Google Scholar
[26] Ma C F, Deen M J, Tarof L E 1997 Adv. Imag. Elect. Phys. 99 65Google Scholar
[27] Jones A H, March S D, Dadey A A, Muhowski A J, Bank S R, Campbell J C 2022 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 58 1Google Scholar
[28] Woodson M E, Ren M, Maddox S J, Chen Y, Bank S R, Campbell J C 2016 App. Phys. Lett. 108 081102Google Scholar
[29] Huang J, Banerjee K, Ghosh S, Hayat M M 2013 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 60 2296Google Scholar
[30] Okuto Y, Crowell C R 1974 Phys. Rev. B 10 4284Google Scholar
[31] 谢生, 张帆, 毛陆虹 2022 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版) 5 1Google Scholar
Xie S, Zhang F, Mao L H 2022 J. Huazhong Univ. of Sci. & Tech. (Natural Science Edition) 5 1Google Scholar
[32] Saleh M A, Hayat M M, Sotirelis P, Holmes A L, Campbell J C, Saleh B E, Teich M C 2001 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 48 2722Google Scholar
[33] 李慧梅 2016 硕士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学院大学)
Li H M 2016 M. S. Thesis (Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
[34] Haško D, Kovác J, Uherek F, Škriniarová J, Jakabovic J, Peternai L 2006 Microelectron. J. 37 483Google Scholar
-
表 1 InAlAs和InP碰撞电离系数的仿真参数
Table 1. Simulation parameters for the ionization coefficients of InAlAs and InP.
材料 an/cm–1 ap/cm–1 bn/(V·cm–1) bp/(V·cm–1) InP 1.0×107 9.36×107 3.45×106 2.78×106 InAlAs 6.2×107 1.00×106 4.00×106 4.00×106 表 2 三种结构特性对比
Table 2. Comparison of the characteristics of three structures.
结构 击穿电压/V 暗电流/nA 增益 Ⅰ 69 1.5(@66 V) 35(@66 V) Ⅱ 44 2.0(@42 V) 15(@42 V) Ⅲ 45 1.5(@43 V) 18(@43 V) -
[1] Mccarthy A, Ren X, Della F A, Gemmell N R, Krichel N J, Scarcella C, Rugger A, Tosi A, Buller G S 2013 Opt. Express 21 22098Google Scholar
[2] Bertone N, Clark W 2007 Laser Focus World 43 69
[3] Mitra P, Beck J D, Skokan M R, Skokan M R, Robinson J E, Antoszewski J, Winchester K J, Keating A J, Nguyen T, Silva K, Musca C A, Dell J M, Faraone L 2006 SPIE Defense Commercial Sensing Orlando, United States, April 14–19, 2006 p70
[4] Tosi A, Calandri N, Sanzaro M, Acerbi F 2014 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. 20 192Google Scholar
[5] Jiang X, Itzler M, O’Donnell K, Entwistle M, Owens M, Slomkowski K, Rangwala S S 2014 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. 21 5Google Scholar
[6] Lee C, Johnson B, Molnar A C 2015 App. Phys. Lett. 106 231105Google Scholar
[7] Nishida K, Taguchi K, Matsumoto Y 1979 App. Phys. Lett. 35 251Google Scholar
[8] Li J, Dehzangi A, Brown G J, Razeghi M 2021 Sci. Rep. 11 7104Google Scholar
[9] Tarof L E 1990 IEEE Photonic. Tech. L. 2 643Google Scholar
[10] Campbell J C, Dentai A G, Holden W S, Kasper B L 1983 Electron. Lett. 19 818Google Scholar
[11] Matsushima Y, Akiba S, Sakai K, Kushiro Y, Noda Y, Utaka K 1982 Electron. Lett. 22 945Google Scholar
[12] Capasso F, Cho A Y, Foy P W 1984 Electron. Lett. 20 635Google Scholar
[13] Forrest S R, Kim O K, Smith R G 1982 App. Phys. Lett. 41 95Google Scholar
[14] Ma C, Deen M J, Tarof L E 1995 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 42 2070Google Scholar
[15] Emmons R B 1967 J. Appl. Phys. 38 3705Google Scholar
[16] Mcintyre R J 1966 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 13 164Google Scholar
[17] 曾巧玉 2014 博士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学院大学)
Zeng Q Y 2014 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
[18] 吕粤希 2018 硕士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学院大学)
Lü Y X 2018 M. S. Thesis (Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
[19] Cook L W, Bulman G E, Stillman G E 1982 App. Phys. Lett. 40 589Google Scholar
[20] Goh Y L, Massey D, Marshall A R, Ng J S, Tan C H, Ng W K, Rees G J, Hopkinson M, David J P, Jones S 2007 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 54 11Google Scholar
[21] Capasso F, Mohammed K, Alavi K, Cho A Y, Foy P W 1984 App. Phys. Lett. 45 968Google Scholar
[22] Melchior H, Hartman A R, Schinke D P, Seidel T E 1978 Bell Syst. Tech. J. 57 1791Google Scholar
[23] Li X, Bamiedakis N, Wei J L, Penty R V, White I H 2014 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)—Laser Science to Photonic Applications San Jose, United States, June 8–13, 2014 p1
[24] Campbell J C 2004 IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. 10 777Google Scholar
[25] Miller S L 1955 Phys. Rev. 99 1234Google Scholar
[26] Ma C F, Deen M J, Tarof L E 1997 Adv. Imag. Elect. Phys. 99 65Google Scholar
[27] Jones A H, March S D, Dadey A A, Muhowski A J, Bank S R, Campbell J C 2022 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 58 1Google Scholar
[28] Woodson M E, Ren M, Maddox S J, Chen Y, Bank S R, Campbell J C 2016 App. Phys. Lett. 108 081102Google Scholar
[29] Huang J, Banerjee K, Ghosh S, Hayat M M 2013 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 60 2296Google Scholar
[30] Okuto Y, Crowell C R 1974 Phys. Rev. B 10 4284Google Scholar
[31] 谢生, 张帆, 毛陆虹 2022 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版) 5 1Google Scholar
Xie S, Zhang F, Mao L H 2022 J. Huazhong Univ. of Sci. & Tech. (Natural Science Edition) 5 1Google Scholar
[32] Saleh M A, Hayat M M, Sotirelis P, Holmes A L, Campbell J C, Saleh B E, Teich M C 2001 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 48 2722Google Scholar
[33] 李慧梅 2016 硕士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学院大学)
Li H M 2016 M. S. Thesis (Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
[34] Haško D, Kovác J, Uherek F, Škriniarová J, Jakabovic J, Peternai L 2006 Microelectron. J. 37 483Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2952
- PDF Downloads: 88
- Cited By: 0