Fast computation approach of electron-impact ionization and excitation cross-sections for atoms and ions with medium- and high-<i>Z</i> elements

Zhou Xu; Wang Chuan; Hu Rong-Hao; Tao Zhi-Hao; Deng Xiao-Liang; Liang Yi-Han; Li Xiao-Ya; Lü Meng; Zhu Wen-Jun

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20240213

Abstract

The atomic data of medium- and high-Z elements, such as electron-impact ionization and excitation cross-sections, possess extensive applications in fields such as fusion science and X-ray interactions with matter. There are atoms and ions in high energy density plasma, with different charge states and energy states ranging from ground states to highly excited states, and the cross-sections of each charge state and energy state need to be calculated. The bottlenecks limiting computational performance are the inevitable relativistic effects of medium- and high-Z elements and the extremely complex electronic configurations. Taking tantalum (Ta) for example, by using the relativistic Dirac-Fock theory and distorted wave model, we compute the electron-impact ionization and excitation cross-sections of Ta from the ground state atom up to Ta⁷²⁺ with the incident electron energy range of 1–150 keV. The detailed configuration accounting (DCA) reaction channel cross-sections are derived by summing and weighting the original detailed level accounting (DLA) cross-sections. After examining the data, two regularities are found. In terms of DLA, the pre-averaging DCA cross-sections have varying initial DLA energy levels but are typically close to each other. There is not a straightforward function that can explain the discrepancies between them. In terms of DCA, inner subshells typically contribute very little to the total cross-section as their ionization and excitation cross-sections are orders of magnitude smaller than those of outer subshells. We provide two techniques to reduce the computational costs based on the regularities. To minimize the total number of DLA reaction channels used in the computation, the initial DLA energy levels can be randomly sampled. Through a Monte Carlo numerical experiment, we determine the appropriate number of sampling points that can reduce the total number of DLA channels by an order of magnitude while maintaining a 5% error margin. In terms of impact ionization, since small cross-section DCA channels are insignificant, only a tiny portion of the DCA channels are required to preserve a 95% accuracy of the entire cross-section. It is possible to use the analytical Binary Encounter Bethe (BEB) formula to determine which DCA channels should be neglected before the computation to reduce computational costs. In terms of electron-impact excitation, just the cross-sections of the same excited subshells as the preserved ionized subshells, which are determined in the previous electron-impact ionization (EII) calculations, are needed. Finally, we compare our EII results with theoretical and experimental results. In the low incident electron energy range of below 2 keV, our results accord with the theoretical result of the 6s EII cross-section of the Ta atom and the experimental result of the total EII cross-section of the Ta¹⁺ ion. In the high energy range of below 150 keV, our results are also consistent with the theoretical result of the 1s EII cross-section of the Ta atom and the experimental result of the 1s EII cross-section of the Cu atom. Our results reasonably match the previous experimental and theoretical results in low-energy range and high-energy range, inner subshell and outer subshell, indicating the accuracy of our calculation. The proposed optimizing strategy can be applied to various medium- to high-Z elements and is compatible to most computation codes.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
College of Physics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
2.
Key Laboratory of High Energy Density Physics and Technology, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610065, China
3.
Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610065, China
4.
Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621000, China

Corresponding author: Hu Rong-Hao, ronghaohu@scu.edu.cn ; Liang Yi-Han, drollor@126.com ; Lü Meng, lvmengphys@scu.edu.cn ;

[1]	Ackermann W, Asova G, Ayvazyan V, et al. 2007 Nat. Photon. 1 336 Google Scholar
[2]	Emma P, Akre R, Arthur J, et al. 2010 Nat. Photon. 4 641 Google Scholar
[3]	Ishikawa T, Aoyagi H, Asaka T, et al. 2012 Nat. Photon. 6 540 Google Scholar
[4]	贾豪彦, 黄森林, 焦毅等 2022 强激光与粒子束 34 05401 Jia H Y, Huang S L, Jiao Y, et al. 2022 High Power Laser Part. Beam 34 05401
[5]	Zhao Z T, Wang D, Gu Q, et al. 2017 Synchrotron Radiat. News 30 6 Google Scholar
[6]	杜靖元 2009 硕士学位论文 (武汉: 华中科技大学) Du J Y 2019 M. S. Thesis (Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology
[7]	马小云, 董晨钟, 武中文, 蒋军, 颉录有 2012 物理学报 61 213401 Google Scholar Ma X Y, Dong C Z, Wu Z W, Jiang J, Jie L Y 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 213401 Google Scholar
[8]	Jurek Z, Son S K, Ziaja B, Santra R 2016 J. Appl. Cryst. 49 1048 Google Scholar
[9]	Son S K, Young L, Santra R 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 033402 Google Scholar
[10]	Medvedev N, Tkachenko V, Lipp V, Li Z, Ziaja B 2018 4open 1 3 Google Scholar
[11]	Renner O, Rosmej F B 2019 Matter Radiat. Extremes 4 024201 Google Scholar
[12]	Barber J L, Barnes C W, Sandberg R L, Sheffield R L 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 184105 Google Scholar
[13]	Parpia F A, Fischer C F, Grant I P 1996 Comput. Phys. Commun. 94 249 Google Scholar
[14]	Jönsson P, He X, Fischer C F, Grant I P 2007 Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 597 Google Scholar
[15]	Gu M F 2008 Can. J. Phys. 86 675 Google Scholar
[16]	Chen Z B, Tian Y S, Sang C C, Wan X L, Wang K, Guo X L 2019 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 129-130 101278 Google Scholar
[17]	Fritzsche S 2012 Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 1525 Google Scholar
[18]	焦飞, 蒋军, 颉录有, 张登红, 董晨钟, 陈展斌 2015 物理学报 64 233401 Google Scholar Jiao F, Jiang J, Jie L Y, Zhang D H, Dong C Z, Chen Z B 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 233401 Google Scholar
[19]	Althiyabi A, El-Sayed F 2022 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 147 101528 Google Scholar
[20]	Zhong J Y, Zhang J, Zeng J L, Zhao G, Gu M F 2005 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 89 101 Google Scholar
[21]	Motoumba E B, Yoca S E, Quinet P, Palmeri P 2020 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 133-134 101340 Google Scholar
[22]	Aggarwal K M 2019 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 125 261 Google Scholar
[23]	Jönsson P, Alkauskas A, Gaigalas G 2013 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 99 431 Google Scholar
[24]	Wang C, Liang Y H, Hu R H, He K, Gao G L, Yan X, Yao D, Wang T, Li X Y, Tian J S, Zhu W J, Lü M 2023 arXiv: 2306.08948v1 [physics. optics]
[25]	Henderson J R, Beiersdorfer P, Bennett C L 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 705 Google Scholar
[26]	Knapp D A, Marrs R E, Elliott S R, Magee E W, Zasadzinski R 1993 Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 334 305 Google Scholar
[27]	Clementson J, Beiersdorfer P, Gu M F 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 012505 Google Scholar
[28]	Ralchenko Y, Draganic I N, Tan J N, Gillaspy J D, Pomeroy J M, Reader J, Feldman U, Holland G E 2008 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 021003 Google Scholar
[29]	Middleman I M, Ford H I, Hofstadter R 1970 Phys. Rev. A 2 1429 Google Scholar
[30]	Müller A, Schippers S, Hellhund J, Holste K, Kilcoyne A L D, Phaneuf R A, Ballance C P, McLaughlin B M 2015 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48 235203 Google Scholar
[31]	Santoni A, Derossi A, Finetti P, Agostino R G, Luo B 1992 Phys. Rev. B 46 15660 Google Scholar
[32]	Singh N, Mittal R, Singh B, Allawadhi K L, Sood B S 1986 Phys. Rev. A 34 3459 Google Scholar
[33]	Kim Y K, Rudd M E 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 3954 Google Scholar
[34]	Hübner H, Ilgen K, Hoffmann K W 1972 Z Physik. 255 269 Google Scholar
[35]	Shima K 1980 Phys. Lett. A 77 237 Google Scholar
[36]	Shima K, Nakagawa T, Umetani K, Mikumo T 1980 Phys. Rev. A 24 72 Google Scholar
[37]	Patory M A R, Uddin M A, Haque A K F, Shahjahan M, Basak A K, Talukder M R, Saha B C 2009 Int. J. Quantum Chem. 109 897 Google Scholar
[38]	Pindzola M S, Loch S D, Colgan J P 2022 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 55 235203 Google Scholar
[39]	Man K F, Smith A C H, Harrison M F A 1987 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys 20 4895 Google Scholar
[40]	Llovet X, Powell C J, Salvat F, Jablonski A 2014 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 43 013102 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 中间总截面相对于其均值的偏差　(a) Ta⁴⁺[Xe]6s⁰4f⁵5d¹⁰碰撞电离截面; (b) Ta⁹⁺[Kr]5s²4d¹⁰5p⁴6s⁰4f¹²碰撞电离截面; (c) Ta¹⁶⁺[Kr]5s¹4d¹⁰5p⁰6s⁰4f¹⁰碰撞电离截面; (d) Ta⁴⁺[Xe]6s⁰4f⁵5d¹⁰碰撞激发截面, 激发到6p亚层

Figure 1. Deviation between pre-averaging total cross-section and averaged total cross-section: (a) Electron-impact ionization (EII) cross-section of Ta⁴⁺[Xe]6s⁰4f⁵5d¹⁰; (b) EII cross-section of Ta⁹⁺[Kr]5s²4d¹⁰5p⁴6s⁰4f¹²; (c) EII cross-section of Ta¹⁶⁺[Kr]5s¹4d¹⁰5p⁰6s⁰4f¹⁰; (d) EIE cross-section of Ta⁴⁺[Xe]6s⁰4f⁵5d¹⁰, excited to 6p subshell.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 通过蒙特卡罗实验评估采样点个数的最佳选择(碰撞电离)　(a) Ta¹⁰⁺[Kr]5s²4d¹⁰5p³6s⁰4f¹², 5p亚层; (b) Ta¹²⁺[Xe]6s⁰4f⁷, 4f亚层; (c) Ta¹⁵⁺[Kr]5s⁰4d¹⁰5p⁶6s⁰4f⁶, 4f亚层; (d) Ta²⁰⁺[Kr]5s⁰4d¹⁰5p⁰6s⁰4f⁷, 4f亚层

Figure 2. Evaluation of optimal number of sample points via Monte-Carlo experiment (EII): (a) Ta¹⁰⁺[Kr]5s²4d¹⁰5p³6s⁰4f¹², on 5p; (b) Ta¹²⁺[Xe]6s⁰4f⁷, on 4f; (c) Ta¹⁵⁺[Kr]5s⁰4d¹⁰5p⁶6s⁰4f⁶, on 4f; (d) Ta²⁰⁺[Kr]5s⁰4d¹⁰5p⁰6s⁰4f⁷, on 4f.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 Ta原子的碰撞电离截面　(a)本文的计算结果; (b) BEB模型的估算结果

Figure 3. Collisional ionization cross-section of Ta atom: (a) Our calculation; (b) BEB model estimation.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 Ta原子碰撞电离截面的累积占比　(a)本文的计算结果; (b) BEB模型的估计结果

Figure 4. Accumulated ratio of EII cross-section of Ta atom: (a) Our calculation; (b) BEB model estimation.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 Ta原子碰撞激发截面与DCA反应道能级差的关系

Figure 5. EIE cross-section of Ta atom vs. DCA reaction channel threshold energy.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 基于DW方法计算的碰撞电离截面与实验和理论结果比较　(a) Ta原子的1s亚层碰撞电离截面; (b) Cu原子的1s亚层碰撞电离截面; (c) Ta原子的6s亚层碰撞电离截面; (d) Ta¹⁺离子的总碰撞电离截面及贡献最大的几个电子亚层的碰撞电离截面(5d, 4f, 6s, 5p)

Figure 6. EII cross-sections based on DW method compared to experimental and theoretical results: (a) EII cross-section of 1s shell of Ta atom; (b) EII cross-section of 1s shell of Cu atom; (c) EII cross-section of 6s shell of Ta atom; (d) total EII cross-section of Ta¹⁺ ion, alongside with EII cross-section of the most-contributing subshells (5d, 4f, 6s, 5p).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Ackermann W, Asova G, Ayvazyan V, et al. 2007 Nat. Photon. 1 336 Google Scholar
[2]	Emma P, Akre R, Arthur J, et al. 2010 Nat. Photon. 4 641 Google Scholar
[3]	Ishikawa T, Aoyagi H, Asaka T, et al. 2012 Nat. Photon. 6 540 Google Scholar
[4]	贾豪彦, 黄森林, 焦毅等 2022 强激光与粒子束 34 05401 Jia H Y, Huang S L, Jiao Y, et al. 2022 High Power Laser Part. Beam 34 05401
[5]	Zhao Z T, Wang D, Gu Q, et al. 2017 Synchrotron Radiat. News 30 6 Google Scholar
[6]	杜靖元 2009 硕士学位论文 (武汉: 华中科技大学) Du J Y 2019 M. S. Thesis (Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology
[7]	马小云, 董晨钟, 武中文, 蒋军, 颉录有 2012 物理学报 61 213401 Google Scholar Ma X Y, Dong C Z, Wu Z W, Jiang J, Jie L Y 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 213401 Google Scholar
[8]	Jurek Z, Son S K, Ziaja B, Santra R 2016 J. Appl. Cryst. 49 1048 Google Scholar
[9]	Son S K, Young L, Santra R 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 033402 Google Scholar
[10]	Medvedev N, Tkachenko V, Lipp V, Li Z, Ziaja B 2018 4open 1 3 Google Scholar
[11]	Renner O, Rosmej F B 2019 Matter Radiat. Extremes 4 024201 Google Scholar
[12]	Barber J L, Barnes C W, Sandberg R L, Sheffield R L 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 184105 Google Scholar
[13]	Parpia F A, Fischer C F, Grant I P 1996 Comput. Phys. Commun. 94 249 Google Scholar
[14]	Jönsson P, He X, Fischer C F, Grant I P 2007 Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 597 Google Scholar
[15]	Gu M F 2008 Can. J. Phys. 86 675 Google Scholar
[16]	Chen Z B, Tian Y S, Sang C C, Wan X L, Wang K, Guo X L 2019 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 129-130 101278 Google Scholar
[17]	Fritzsche S 2012 Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 1525 Google Scholar
[18]	焦飞, 蒋军, 颉录有, 张登红, 董晨钟, 陈展斌 2015 物理学报 64 233401 Google Scholar Jiao F, Jiang J, Jie L Y, Zhang D H, Dong C Z, Chen Z B 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 233401 Google Scholar
[19]	Althiyabi A, El-Sayed F 2022 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 147 101528 Google Scholar
[20]	Zhong J Y, Zhang J, Zeng J L, Zhao G, Gu M F 2005 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 89 101 Google Scholar
[21]	Motoumba E B, Yoca S E, Quinet P, Palmeri P 2020 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 133-134 101340 Google Scholar
[22]	Aggarwal K M 2019 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 125 261 Google Scholar
[23]	Jönsson P, Alkauskas A, Gaigalas G 2013 Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 99 431 Google Scholar
[24]	Wang C, Liang Y H, Hu R H, He K, Gao G L, Yan X, Yao D, Wang T, Li X Y, Tian J S, Zhu W J, Lü M 2023 arXiv: 2306.08948v1 [physics. optics]
[25]	Henderson J R, Beiersdorfer P, Bennett C L 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 705 Google Scholar
[26]	Knapp D A, Marrs R E, Elliott S R, Magee E W, Zasadzinski R 1993 Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 334 305 Google Scholar
[27]	Clementson J, Beiersdorfer P, Gu M F 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 012505 Google Scholar
[28]	Ralchenko Y, Draganic I N, Tan J N, Gillaspy J D, Pomeroy J M, Reader J, Feldman U, Holland G E 2008 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 021003 Google Scholar
[29]	Middleman I M, Ford H I, Hofstadter R 1970 Phys. Rev. A 2 1429 Google Scholar
[30]	Müller A, Schippers S, Hellhund J, Holste K, Kilcoyne A L D, Phaneuf R A, Ballance C P, McLaughlin B M 2015 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48 235203 Google Scholar
[31]	Santoni A, Derossi A, Finetti P, Agostino R G, Luo B 1992 Phys. Rev. B 46 15660 Google Scholar
[32]	Singh N, Mittal R, Singh B, Allawadhi K L, Sood B S 1986 Phys. Rev. A 34 3459 Google Scholar
[33]	Kim Y K, Rudd M E 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 3954 Google Scholar
[34]	Hübner H, Ilgen K, Hoffmann K W 1972 Z Physik. 255 269 Google Scholar
[35]	Shima K 1980 Phys. Lett. A 77 237 Google Scholar
[36]	Shima K, Nakagawa T, Umetani K, Mikumo T 1980 Phys. Rev. A 24 72 Google Scholar
[37]	Patory M A R, Uddin M A, Haque A K F, Shahjahan M, Basak A K, Talukder M R, Saha B C 2009 Int. J. Quantum Chem. 109 897 Google Scholar
[38]	Pindzola M S, Loch S D, Colgan J P 2022 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 55 235203 Google Scholar
[39]	Man K F, Smith A C H, Harrison M F A 1987 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys 20 4895 Google Scholar
[40]	Llovet X, Powell C J, Salvat F, Jablonski A 2014 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 43 013102 Google Scholar

[1]	Chen Zhan-Bin, Ma Kun. Influence of eikonal-initial-state on ionization of atom by proton. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(11): 113401. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172465
[2]	Zhang Li-Min, Jia Chang-Chun, Wang Qi, Chen Zhang-Jin. First-order distorted wave Born approximation for single ionization of Ar by electron impact in a coplanar doubly symmetric geometry. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(15): 153401. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.153401
[3]	Zhao Wu-Duo, Wang Wei-Guo, Li Hai-Yang. Numerical simulation and experimental investigation of the production of multiply charged ions by the ionization of benzene cluster with a moderate intensity laser. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(10): 103602. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.103602
[4]	Liu Meng, Su Lu-Ning, Zheng Yi, Li Yu-Tong, Wang Wei-Min, Sheng Zheng-Ming, Chen Li-Ming, Ma Jing-Long, Lu Xin, Wang Zhao-Hua, Wei Zhi-Yi, Hu Bi-Tao, Zhang Jie. Origin of energetic carbon ions with different charge states in ultrashort laser-thin foil interactions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(16): 165201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.165201
[5]	Zhuo Qing-Qing, Liu Hong-Xia, Peng Li, Yang Zhao-Nian, Cai Hui-Min. Mechanism of three kink effects in irradiated partially-depleted SOINMOSFET's. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(3): 036105. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.036105
[6]	Ding Ding, He Bin, Shi Xian, Jian Guo. The differential cross sections and mechanisms of ionization and in the collisions of He2++H(1s) with strong magnetic fields. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(3): 033401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.033401
[7]	Hu Ya-Hua, Ye Dan-Dan, Qi Yue-Ying, Liu Xiao-Ju, Liu Ling. Research on collision ionization process of Be atom by proton. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(24): 243401. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.243401
[8]	Zhuo Qing-Qing, Liu Hong-Xia, Yang Zhao-Nian, Cai Hui-Min, Hao Yue. The total dose irradiation effects of SOI NMOS devices under different bias conditions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(22): 220702. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.220702
[9]	Zhang Dong-Ling, Tang Qing-Bin, Yu Ben-Hai, Chen Dong. Nonsequential double ionization of argon atom below the recollision threshold. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(5): 053205. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.053205
[10]	Guo Bao-Zeng, Zhang Suo-Liang, Liu Xin. Electron transport property in wurtzite GaN at high electric field with Monte Carlo simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(6): 068701. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.068701
[11]	Sun Wei-Feng, Li Mei-Cheng, Zhao Lian-Cheng. First-principles investigation of carrier Auger lifetime and impact ionization rate in narrow-gap superlattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(8): 5661-5666. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5661
[12]	Tian Ming-Feng, Meng Xu-Jun, Zhu Xi-Rui, Jiang Min-Hao, Wang Zhi-Gang. Theoretical study of cross sections of excitation and ionization for electron-ion impact in average-atomic model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(10): 4673-4679. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4673
[13]	Wang Xiao-Feng, Jia Tian-Qing, Xu Zhi-Zhan. Photon absorption of conduction band electronsand impact ionization under irradiation of few-cycle ultrashort laser pulses. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(7): 3451-3456. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3451
[14]	LIU XIAO-YA, LI QUAN, JIANG GANG, ZHU ZHENG-HECHEN, HAN-DE, JIN XING-XING, TANG YONG-JIAN. THE MECHANISM OF MICROWAVE EXCITATION IN ArS2 SYSTEM. Acta Physica Sinica, 2000, 49(12): 2340-2346. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.2340
[15]	WANG JIN, HU ZHENG-FA, ZHANG DENG-YU, ZHAN MING-SHENG. EXCITATION ENERGY TRANSFER BY COLLISIONS BETWEEN EXCITED RUBIDIUM ATOMS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1998, 47(8): 1265-1271. doi: 10.7498/aps.47.1265
[16]	YAN SHI-XIANG, CHEN CHONG-YANG, TENG ZHOU-XUAN, WANG YAN-SEN, SUN YONG-SHENG. DISTORTED-WAVE CALCULATIONS OF THE ELECTRON-IMPACT IONIZATION FOR LOWLY AND MEDIUMLY IONIZED IONS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1998, 47(4): 583-590. doi: 10.7498/aps.47.583
[17]	SHEN YI-FAN, LI WAN-XING. COLLISIONAL ENERGY POOLING BETWEEN EXCITED SODIUM ATOMS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1996, 45(1): 29-36. doi: 10.7498/aps.45.29
[18]	Fang Quan-Yu, Cai Wei, Shen Zhi-Jun, Li Peng, Zhou Yu, Xu Yuan-Guang, Chen Guo-Xin. . Acta Physica Sinica, 1995, 44(3): 383-395. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.383
[19]	SHEN YI-FAN, LI WAN-XING. ENERGY TRANSFER IN COLLISIONS BETWEEN TWO EXCITED CESIUM ATOMS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1993, 42(11): 1766-1773. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.1766
[20]	SHEN YI-FAN, LI WAN-XIN. ASSOCIATIVE IONIZATION OCCURRING IN COLLISIONS BETWEEN TWO Na(3P) ATOMS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1993, 42(1): 32-39. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.32

10-20240213Suppl.pdf

Catalog

Vol. 73, Issue 10 - 2024-05-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 2167
PDF Downloads: 67
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板

Fast computation approach of electron-impact ionization and excitation cross-sections for atoms and ions with medium- and high-Z elements

Abstract

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Hu Rong-Hao, ronghaohu@scu.edu.cn ; Liang Yi-Han, drollor@126.com ; Lü Meng, lvmengphys@scu.edu.cn ;

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

Supplements

References

Cited By

Catalog

Metrics

Authors

Referees

About Journal

About

Search

Article

留言板

Fast computation approach of electron-impact ionization and excitation cross-sections for atoms and ions with medium- and high-Z elements

Abstract

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Hu Rong-Hao, ronghaohu@scu.edu.cn ; Liang Yi-Han, drollor@126.com ; Lü Meng, lvmengphys@scu.edu.cn ;

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

Supplements

References

Cited By

Catalog

Metrics

Publishing process

Authors

Referees

About Journal

About