-
The coupling between translational motion and rotational motion in liquids is one of the long-standing concerns in condensed matter physics. The relaxation times of α relaxation and probe ion conductivities in a series of small molecular liquids, 15 types of single and binary small molecular liquids with different molecular shapes and functional groups when the number of carbon atoms is in a range from 3 to 14, are simultaneously obtained by dielectric spectroscopy method in this work. The results indicate that the coupling between translation and rotation is not directly related to the functional group of liquid molecules, nor very sensitive to the shape nor the size of molecules or ion size. However, the microstructure of liquid is a key factor affecting the coupling between translation and rotation. In other words, when the microstructure of the liquid is unchanged, the dependence of relaxation time on temperature is consistent with the dependence of conductivity reciprocal on temperature, whether in single small molecular liquids or in binary small molecular liquids, which provides a method for measuring relaxation time. The research results also show that the temperature dependence of the conductivity of the impurity ions carried by the liquid itself is consistent with the one of quantitatively doped ions, providing the ideas for investigating the ion conductivity behavior in organic small molecular liquids with low electrolyte solubilities. The experimental results of monohydroxy alcohol are consistent with the viewpoint that α relaxation rather than Debye relaxation corresponds to the system structure relaxation.
-
Keywords:
- coupling between translation and rotation /
- relaxation time /
- probe ion conductivity /
- small molecular liquid
[1] Shirai K, Watanabe K, Momida H 2022 J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 34 375902Google Scholar
[2] Ouyang L F, Shen J, Huang Y, Sun Y H, Bai H Y, Wang W H 2023 J. Appl. Phys. 133 85105Google Scholar
[3] Böhmer R, Gainaru C, Richert R 2014 Phys. Rep. 545 125Google Scholar
[4] Shen J, Zhang H P, Chen Z Q, Ouyang L F, Wang F R, Lu Z, Li M Z, Sun Y H, Bai H Y, Wang W H 2023 Acta Mater. 244 118554Google Scholar
[5] Singh A, Singh Y 2023 Phys. Rev. E 107 14119Google Scholar
[6] Volbers J C, Lauterböck L, Hofmann N, Glasmacher B 2016 Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng. 2 315Google Scholar
[7] Zhu X C, Miller-Ezzy P, Gluis M, Zhao Y Y, Qin J G, Tang Y H, Liu Y B, Li X X 2023 Aquaculture 574 739650Google Scholar
[8] Novikov V N 2016 Chem. Phys. Lett. 659 133Google Scholar
[9] Dyre J C 2006 Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 953Google Scholar
[10] Kremer F 2002 J. Non-Cryst. Solids 305 1Google Scholar
[11] Iacob C, Sangoro J R, Serghei A, Naumov S, Korth Y, Kärger J, Friedrich C, Kremer F 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 129 234511Google Scholar
[12] Wang J, Cai Z Q, Kang H, Huo B K, Zhang Y H, Gao Y Q, Li Z J, Feng S D, Wang L M 2024 Mater. Design 238 112665Google Scholar
[13] Duan Y J, Nabahat M, Tong Y, Ortiz-Membrado L, Jiménez-Piqué E, Zhao K, Wang Y J, Yang Y, Wada T, Kato H, Pelletier J M, Qiao J C, Pineda E 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 56101Google Scholar
[14] Chen Y X, Feng S D, Lu X Q, Pan S P, Xia C Q, Wang L M 2023 J. Chem. Phys. 158 134511Google Scholar
[15] Duan Y J, Zhang L T, Qiao J C, Wang Y J, Yang Y, Wada T, Kato H, Pelletier J M, Pineda E, Crespo D 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 175501Google Scholar
[16] Zhao X Y, Wang L N, Yin H M, Zhou H W, Huang Y N 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 86601Google Scholar
[17] Nernst W 1888 Z. Phys. Chem. 2 613Google Scholar
[18] Einstein A 1905 Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 17 549Google Scholar
[19] Claisse F, Koenig H P 1956 Acta Metallurgica 4 650Google Scholar
[20] Masuhr A, Waniuk T A, Busch R, Johnson W L 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 2290Google Scholar
[21] Wang L M and Sun M D 2010 J. Yanshan Univ. 34 471 [王利民, 孙明道 2010 燕山大学学报 34 471]Google Scholar
Wang L M and Sun M D 2010 J. Yanshan Univ. 34 471Google Scholar
[22] Tarjus G, Kivelson D 1995 J. Chem. Phys. 103 3071Google Scholar
[23] Khrapak S A 2022 J. Mol. Liq. 354 118840Google Scholar
[24] Griffin P J, Sangoro J R, Wang Y, Holt A P, Novikov V N, Sokolov A P, Wojnarowska Z, Paluch M, Kremer F 2013 Soft Matter 9 10373Google Scholar
[25] Swiergiel J, Bouteiller L, Jadzyn J 2014 Soft Matter 10 8457Google Scholar
[26] Kawasaki T, Kim K 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 8118Google Scholar
[27] Power G, Vij J K, Johari G P 2007 J. Phys. Chem. B 111 11201Google Scholar
[28] Xiao H, Zhang L, Yi J, Li S, Zhao B G, Zhai Q J, Gao Y L 2022 Intermetallics 143 107494Google Scholar
[29] Charbonneau P, Jin Y, Parisi G, Zamponi F 2014 Proc. National Academy Sci. 111 15025Google Scholar
[30] Starzonek S, Rzoska S J, Drozd-Rzoska A, Pawlus S, Biała E, Martinez-Garcia J C, Kistersky L 2015 Soft Matter 11 5554Google Scholar
[31] Zhao X Y, Wang L N, He Y F, Zhou H, Huang Y N 2020 Chem. Phys. 528 110473Google Scholar
[32] Ishai P B, Talary M S, Caduff A, Levy E, Feldman Y 2013 Meas. Sci. Technol. 24 102001Google Scholar
[33] Lunkenheimer P, Schneider U, Brand R, Loidl A 2000 Contemp. Phys. 41 15Google Scholar
[34] Huth H, Wang L M, Schick C, Richert R 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 126 104503Google Scholar
[35] Jakobsen B, Maggi C, Christensen T, Dyre J C 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 129 184502Google Scholar
[36] Gainaru C, Meier R, Schildmann S, Lederle C, Hiller W, Rössler E A, Böhmer R 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 258303Google Scholar
[37] Gainaru C, Kastner S, Mayr F, Lunkenheimer P, Schildmann S, Weber H J, Hiller W, Loidl A, Böhmer R 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 118304Google Scholar
[38] Bauer S, Burlafinger K, Gainaru C, Lunkenheimer P, Hiller W, Loidl A, Böhmer R 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 138 94505Google Scholar
[39] Lu G, Wang L N, Zhao X Y, He Y, Huang Y N 2021 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 35 2150014Google Scholar
[40] Wang L N, Zhao X Y, Huang Y N 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 97701Google Scholar
[41] Ediger M D, Angell C A, Nagel S R 1996 J. Phys. Chem. 100 13200Google Scholar
[42] Zhang H, Zhong C, Douglas J F, Wang X D, Cao Q P, Zhang D X, Jiang J Z 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 142 164506Google Scholar
[43] Moynihan C T, Macedo P B, Montrose C J, Gupta P K 1976 Ann. Ny. Acad. Sci. 279 15Google Scholar
-
图 8 掺入0.3‰氯化钠的70%1,2-丙二醇和30%1, 3-丙二醇混合液体与掺入0.3‰氯化镁的70%1,3-丁二醇和30%丙三醇混合液体及其原始样品的$ {\tau }_{{\mathrm{r}}} $和$ \sigma $
Figure 8. $ {\tau }_{{\mathrm{r}}} $ and $ \sigma $ of mixed liquid of 70% 1,2-propanediol and 30% 1,3-propanediol doped with 0.3‰ NaCl and mixed liquid of 70% 1,3-butanediol and 30% glycerol doped with 0.3‰ MgCl2 as well as their crude samples.
-
[1] Shirai K, Watanabe K, Momida H 2022 J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 34 375902Google Scholar
[2] Ouyang L F, Shen J, Huang Y, Sun Y H, Bai H Y, Wang W H 2023 J. Appl. Phys. 133 85105Google Scholar
[3] Böhmer R, Gainaru C, Richert R 2014 Phys. Rep. 545 125Google Scholar
[4] Shen J, Zhang H P, Chen Z Q, Ouyang L F, Wang F R, Lu Z, Li M Z, Sun Y H, Bai H Y, Wang W H 2023 Acta Mater. 244 118554Google Scholar
[5] Singh A, Singh Y 2023 Phys. Rev. E 107 14119Google Scholar
[6] Volbers J C, Lauterböck L, Hofmann N, Glasmacher B 2016 Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng. 2 315Google Scholar
[7] Zhu X C, Miller-Ezzy P, Gluis M, Zhao Y Y, Qin J G, Tang Y H, Liu Y B, Li X X 2023 Aquaculture 574 739650Google Scholar
[8] Novikov V N 2016 Chem. Phys. Lett. 659 133Google Scholar
[9] Dyre J C 2006 Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 953Google Scholar
[10] Kremer F 2002 J. Non-Cryst. Solids 305 1Google Scholar
[11] Iacob C, Sangoro J R, Serghei A, Naumov S, Korth Y, Kärger J, Friedrich C, Kremer F 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 129 234511Google Scholar
[12] Wang J, Cai Z Q, Kang H, Huo B K, Zhang Y H, Gao Y Q, Li Z J, Feng S D, Wang L M 2024 Mater. Design 238 112665Google Scholar
[13] Duan Y J, Nabahat M, Tong Y, Ortiz-Membrado L, Jiménez-Piqué E, Zhao K, Wang Y J, Yang Y, Wada T, Kato H, Pelletier J M, Qiao J C, Pineda E 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 56101Google Scholar
[14] Chen Y X, Feng S D, Lu X Q, Pan S P, Xia C Q, Wang L M 2023 J. Chem. Phys. 158 134511Google Scholar
[15] Duan Y J, Zhang L T, Qiao J C, Wang Y J, Yang Y, Wada T, Kato H, Pelletier J M, Pineda E, Crespo D 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 175501Google Scholar
[16] Zhao X Y, Wang L N, Yin H M, Zhou H W, Huang Y N 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 86601Google Scholar
[17] Nernst W 1888 Z. Phys. Chem. 2 613Google Scholar
[18] Einstein A 1905 Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 17 549Google Scholar
[19] Claisse F, Koenig H P 1956 Acta Metallurgica 4 650Google Scholar
[20] Masuhr A, Waniuk T A, Busch R, Johnson W L 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 2290Google Scholar
[21] Wang L M and Sun M D 2010 J. Yanshan Univ. 34 471 [王利民, 孙明道 2010 燕山大学学报 34 471]Google Scholar
Wang L M and Sun M D 2010 J. Yanshan Univ. 34 471Google Scholar
[22] Tarjus G, Kivelson D 1995 J. Chem. Phys. 103 3071Google Scholar
[23] Khrapak S A 2022 J. Mol. Liq. 354 118840Google Scholar
[24] Griffin P J, Sangoro J R, Wang Y, Holt A P, Novikov V N, Sokolov A P, Wojnarowska Z, Paluch M, Kremer F 2013 Soft Matter 9 10373Google Scholar
[25] Swiergiel J, Bouteiller L, Jadzyn J 2014 Soft Matter 10 8457Google Scholar
[26] Kawasaki T, Kim K 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 8118Google Scholar
[27] Power G, Vij J K, Johari G P 2007 J. Phys. Chem. B 111 11201Google Scholar
[28] Xiao H, Zhang L, Yi J, Li S, Zhao B G, Zhai Q J, Gao Y L 2022 Intermetallics 143 107494Google Scholar
[29] Charbonneau P, Jin Y, Parisi G, Zamponi F 2014 Proc. National Academy Sci. 111 15025Google Scholar
[30] Starzonek S, Rzoska S J, Drozd-Rzoska A, Pawlus S, Biała E, Martinez-Garcia J C, Kistersky L 2015 Soft Matter 11 5554Google Scholar
[31] Zhao X Y, Wang L N, He Y F, Zhou H, Huang Y N 2020 Chem. Phys. 528 110473Google Scholar
[32] Ishai P B, Talary M S, Caduff A, Levy E, Feldman Y 2013 Meas. Sci. Technol. 24 102001Google Scholar
[33] Lunkenheimer P, Schneider U, Brand R, Loidl A 2000 Contemp. Phys. 41 15Google Scholar
[34] Huth H, Wang L M, Schick C, Richert R 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 126 104503Google Scholar
[35] Jakobsen B, Maggi C, Christensen T, Dyre J C 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 129 184502Google Scholar
[36] Gainaru C, Meier R, Schildmann S, Lederle C, Hiller W, Rössler E A, Böhmer R 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 258303Google Scholar
[37] Gainaru C, Kastner S, Mayr F, Lunkenheimer P, Schildmann S, Weber H J, Hiller W, Loidl A, Böhmer R 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 118304Google Scholar
[38] Bauer S, Burlafinger K, Gainaru C, Lunkenheimer P, Hiller W, Loidl A, Böhmer R 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 138 94505Google Scholar
[39] Lu G, Wang L N, Zhao X Y, He Y, Huang Y N 2021 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 35 2150014Google Scholar
[40] Wang L N, Zhao X Y, Huang Y N 2019 Chin. Phys. Lett. 36 97701Google Scholar
[41] Ediger M D, Angell C A, Nagel S R 1996 J. Phys. Chem. 100 13200Google Scholar
[42] Zhang H, Zhong C, Douglas J F, Wang X D, Cao Q P, Zhang D X, Jiang J Z 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 142 164506Google Scholar
[43] Moynihan C T, Macedo P B, Montrose C J, Gupta P K 1976 Ann. Ny. Acad. Sci. 279 15Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 1222
- PDF Downloads: 26
- Cited By: 0