搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

高功率激光装置熔石英紫外损伤增长研究

韩伟 冯斌 郑奎兴 朱启华 郑万国 巩马理

引用本文:
Citation:

高功率激光装置熔石英紫外损伤增长研究

韩伟, 冯斌, 郑奎兴, 朱启华, 郑万国, 巩马理

Laser-induced damage growth of fused silica at 351 nm on a large-aperture high-power laser facility

Han Wei, Feng Bin, Zheng Kui-Xing, Zhu Qi-Hua, Zheng Wan-Guo, Gong Ma-Li
PDF
导出引用
  • 基于大口径高功率激光装置开展了熔石英紫外损伤增长的实验研究.研究结果表明:在5 ns平顶脉冲的紫外激光辐照下,熔石英后表面损伤点尺寸随激光发次主要服从指数增长规律,且损伤增长速率随激光通量的增加而上升;但是,在相同的激光通量下损伤增长速率并非一个恒定值,而是存在一定的分布范围,说明除激光通量外还存在其他的影响因素.进一步的统计分析表明,在相同的激光通量下,小尺寸损伤点的平均增长速率高于大尺寸损伤点,表明损伤增长速率不仅与激光通量有关,还与损伤点尺寸有关.由于损伤增长主要源于损伤坑轴向和纵向裂纹在力学作用下发生扩展,因此小尺寸损伤点增长速率高于大尺寸损伤点增长速率说明小尺寸损伤点更易将激光能量耦合为弹性应变能.研究结果对熔石英使用寿命的精确预测和损伤机理的深入认识具有重要意义.
    Laser-induced damage of fused silica optics at 351 nm is a key factor limiting the output energy of high-power laser facility, especially the damage growth process. A comprehensive understanding of its damage growth behavior is of critical importance for high-power laser facility. Thus we study the laser-induced damage growth on the exit surface of fused silica under the subsequent illumination of 5 ns square pulses at 351 nm on a large-aperture high-power laser facility. Experiment is conducted with a 36 cm thick UV grade fused silica focus lens in clean atmosphere and at room temperature. 56 laser shots of 3 fluence in a range from 0.1 J/cm2 to 8.1 J/cm2 are fired during the experiment. And the damage initiation process and growth process are monitored and recorded with an online optics damage inspection instrument which has an optical resolution of about 50 m. Experimental results demonstrate that the sizes of exit-surface damage sites exponentially or linearly grow with laser shots and the damage growth rate increases with laser fluence. However, it is found that even under the same laser conditions the damage grow rate is not a fixed value, which means that besides the laser fluence other parameters also influence the damage grow process. In order to highlight some tendencies, we consider the single-shot damage growth rate and calculate the average of inside fluence bins. Statistical analysis shows that smaller sites tend to grow with larger growth rates than larger sites under the irradiation of the same laser fluence. This result indicates that damage growth rate is influenced by both laser fluence and damage site size. It suggests that the damage growth rule needs to be incorporated into a size-dependent growth effect. The result that higher growth rates are obtained for small damage sites may be related to the damage growth mechanism of fused silica. Damage crater of fused silica consists of a central core and numerous surrounding cracks. The defects in the central core absorb laser energy and yield plasma, then the plasma pressure will open the cracks on the periphery of the crater and lead to lateral and axial expansion of cracks which can be identified as damage growth. The fact that smaller sites grow faster than larger sites implies that smaller sites more efficiently couple laser energy into fracture energy. Our results have important implications for both the prediction of fused silica optics lifetime and the fundamental understanding of laser damage mechanism.
      通信作者: 巩马理, gongml@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号:61505187)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Gong Ma-Li, gongml@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61505187).
    [1]

    Bercegol H, Boscheron A, Di-Nicola J M, Journot E, Lamaignère L, Něauport J, Razě G 2008 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 112 032013

    [2]

    Chambonneau M, Grua P, Rullier J L, Natoli J Y, Lamaignère L 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 103101

    [3]

    Bertussi B, Cormont P, Palmier S, Legros P, Rullier J L 2009 Opt. Express 17 11469

    [4]

    Wong J, Ferriera J L, Lindsey E F, Haupt D L, Hutcheon I D, Kinney J H 2006 J. Non-cryst. Solids 352 255

    [5]

    Norton M A, Hrubesh L W, Wu Z, Donohue E E, Feit M D, Kozlowski M R, Milam D, Neeb K P, Molander W A, Rubenchik A M, Sell W D, Wegner P 2001 Proc. SPIE 4347 468

    [6]

    Razě G, Morchain J M, Loiseau M, Lamaignere L, Josse M A, Bercegol H 2003 Proc. SPIE 4932 127

    [7]

    Norton M A, Donohue E E, Hollingsworth W G, McElroy J N, Hackel R P 2004 Proc. SPIE 5273 236

    [8]

    Norton M A, Donohue E E, Feit M D, Hackel R P, Hollingsworth W G, Rubenchik A M, Spaeth M L 2005 Proc. SPIE 5991 599108

    [9]

    Norton M A, Donohue E E, Feit M D, Hackel R P, Hollingsworth W G, Rubenchik A M, Spaeth M L 2007 Proc. SPIE 6403 64030L

    [10]

    Norton M A, Carr A V, Carr C W, Donohue E E, Feit M D, Hollingsworth W G, Liao Z, Negres R A, Rubenchik A M, Wegner P 2008 Proc. SPIE 7132 71321H

    [11]

    Negres R A, Norton M A, Cross D A, Carr C W 2010 Opt. Express 18 19966

    [12]

    Lamaignère L, Reyné S, Loiseau M, Poncetta J C, Bercegol H 2007 Proc. SPIE 6720 67200F

    [13]

    Raman R N, Demos S G, Shen N, Feigenbaum E, Negres R A, Elhadj S, Rubenchik A M, Matthews M J 2016 Opt. Express 24 2634

    [14]

    Laurence T A, Bude J D, Shen N, Feldman T, Miller P E, Steele W A, Suratwala T I 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 151114

    [15]

    Demos S G, Negres R A, Raman R N, Shen N, Rubenchik A M, Matthews M J 2016 Opt. Express 24 7792

    [16]

    Suratwala T I, Miller P E, Bude J D, Steele W A, Shen N, Monticelli M V, Feit M D, Laurence T A, Norton M A, Carr C W, Wong L L 2011 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94 416

    [17]

    Ye X, Huang J, Liu H J, Geng F, Sun L X, Jiang X D, Wu W D, Qiao L, Zu X T, Zheng W G 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 31111

    [18]

    Negres R A, Abdulla G M, Cross D A, Liao Z M, Carr C W 2012 Opt. Express 20 13030

    [19]

    Negres R A, Liao Z M, Abdulla G M, Cross D A, Norton M A, Carr C W 2011 Appl. Opt. 50 D12

    [20]

    Lamaignère L, Dupuy G, Bourgeade A, Benoist A, Roques A, Courchinoux R 2014 Appl. Phys. B 114 517

    [21]

    Negres R A, Cross D A, Liao Z M, Mattews M J, Carr C W 2014 Opt. Express 22 3824

    [22]

    Lamaignère L, Dupuy G, Donval T, Grua P, Bercegol H 2011 Appl. Opt. 50 441

    [23]

    Han W, Huang W W, Wang F, Li K Y, Feng B, Li F Q, Jing F, Zheng W G 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 106105

    [24]

    Liao Z M, Abdulla G M, Negres R A, Cross D A, Carr C W 2012 Opt. Express 20 15569

    [25]

    Liao Z M, Raymond B, Gaylord J, Fallejo R, Bude J, Wegner P 2014 Opt. Express 22 28845

    [26]

    Carr C W, Matthews M J, Bude J D, Spaeth M L 2007 Proc. SPIE 6403 64030K

  • [1]

    Bercegol H, Boscheron A, Di-Nicola J M, Journot E, Lamaignère L, Něauport J, Razě G 2008 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 112 032013

    [2]

    Chambonneau M, Grua P, Rullier J L, Natoli J Y, Lamaignère L 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 103101

    [3]

    Bertussi B, Cormont P, Palmier S, Legros P, Rullier J L 2009 Opt. Express 17 11469

    [4]

    Wong J, Ferriera J L, Lindsey E F, Haupt D L, Hutcheon I D, Kinney J H 2006 J. Non-cryst. Solids 352 255

    [5]

    Norton M A, Hrubesh L W, Wu Z, Donohue E E, Feit M D, Kozlowski M R, Milam D, Neeb K P, Molander W A, Rubenchik A M, Sell W D, Wegner P 2001 Proc. SPIE 4347 468

    [6]

    Razě G, Morchain J M, Loiseau M, Lamaignere L, Josse M A, Bercegol H 2003 Proc. SPIE 4932 127

    [7]

    Norton M A, Donohue E E, Hollingsworth W G, McElroy J N, Hackel R P 2004 Proc. SPIE 5273 236

    [8]

    Norton M A, Donohue E E, Feit M D, Hackel R P, Hollingsworth W G, Rubenchik A M, Spaeth M L 2005 Proc. SPIE 5991 599108

    [9]

    Norton M A, Donohue E E, Feit M D, Hackel R P, Hollingsworth W G, Rubenchik A M, Spaeth M L 2007 Proc. SPIE 6403 64030L

    [10]

    Norton M A, Carr A V, Carr C W, Donohue E E, Feit M D, Hollingsworth W G, Liao Z, Negres R A, Rubenchik A M, Wegner P 2008 Proc. SPIE 7132 71321H

    [11]

    Negres R A, Norton M A, Cross D A, Carr C W 2010 Opt. Express 18 19966

    [12]

    Lamaignère L, Reyné S, Loiseau M, Poncetta J C, Bercegol H 2007 Proc. SPIE 6720 67200F

    [13]

    Raman R N, Demos S G, Shen N, Feigenbaum E, Negres R A, Elhadj S, Rubenchik A M, Matthews M J 2016 Opt. Express 24 2634

    [14]

    Laurence T A, Bude J D, Shen N, Feldman T, Miller P E, Steele W A, Suratwala T I 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 151114

    [15]

    Demos S G, Negres R A, Raman R N, Shen N, Rubenchik A M, Matthews M J 2016 Opt. Express 24 7792

    [16]

    Suratwala T I, Miller P E, Bude J D, Steele W A, Shen N, Monticelli M V, Feit M D, Laurence T A, Norton M A, Carr C W, Wong L L 2011 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94 416

    [17]

    Ye X, Huang J, Liu H J, Geng F, Sun L X, Jiang X D, Wu W D, Qiao L, Zu X T, Zheng W G 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 31111

    [18]

    Negres R A, Abdulla G M, Cross D A, Liao Z M, Carr C W 2012 Opt. Express 20 13030

    [19]

    Negres R A, Liao Z M, Abdulla G M, Cross D A, Norton M A, Carr C W 2011 Appl. Opt. 50 D12

    [20]

    Lamaignère L, Dupuy G, Bourgeade A, Benoist A, Roques A, Courchinoux R 2014 Appl. Phys. B 114 517

    [21]

    Negres R A, Cross D A, Liao Z M, Mattews M J, Carr C W 2014 Opt. Express 22 3824

    [22]

    Lamaignère L, Dupuy G, Donval T, Grua P, Bercegol H 2011 Appl. Opt. 50 441

    [23]

    Han W, Huang W W, Wang F, Li K Y, Feng B, Li F Q, Jing F, Zheng W G 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 106105

    [24]

    Liao Z M, Abdulla G M, Negres R A, Cross D A, Carr C W 2012 Opt. Express 20 15569

    [25]

    Liao Z M, Raymond B, Gaylord J, Fallejo R, Bude J, Wegner P 2014 Opt. Express 22 28845

    [26]

    Carr C W, Matthews M J, Bude J D, Spaeth M L 2007 Proc. SPIE 6403 64030K

  • [1] 张学阳, 陈军, 胡望宇. 激光辐照下熔石英表面损伤的原子模拟. 物理学报, 2023, 72(15): 156201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230606
    [2] 张丽娟, 张传超, 陈静, 白阳, 蒋一岚, 蒋晓龙, 王海军, 栾晓雨, 袁晓东, 廖威. 激光诱导熔石英表面损伤修复中的气泡形成和控制研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(1): 016103. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171839
    [3] 白阳, 张丽娟, 廖威, 周海, 张传超, 陈静, 叶亚云, 蒋一岚, 王海军, 栾晓雨, 袁晓东, 郑万国. 熔石英损伤修复坑下游光场调制的数值模拟与实验研究. 物理学报, 2016, 65(2): 024205. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.024205
    [4] 沈超, 程湘爱, 田野, 许中杰, 江天. 1064nm纳秒激光对熔石英元件后表面击穿的实验与数值研究. 物理学报, 2016, 65(15): 155201. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.155201
    [5] 蒋勇, 袁晓东, 王海军, 廖威, 刘春明, 向霞, 邱荣, 周强, 高翔, 杨永佳, 郑万国, 祖小涛, 苗心向. 退火对熔石英表面损伤修复点损伤增长的影响. 物理学报, 2016, 65(4): 044209. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.044209
    [6] 钟勉, 杨亮, 任玮, 向霞, 刘翔, 练友运, 徐世珍, 郭德成, 郑万国, 袁晓东. 高功率脉冲电子束辐照SiO2的光学和激光损伤性能. 物理学报, 2014, 63(24): 246103. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.246103
    [7] 孙晓艳, 雷泽民, 卢兴强, 范滇元. 表面颗粒污染物诱导薄光学元件初始损伤的机理. 物理学报, 2014, 63(13): 134201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.134201
    [8] 蒋勇, 贺少勃, 袁晓东, 王海军, 廖威, 吕海兵, 刘春明, 向霞, 邱荣, 杨永佳, 郑万国, 祖小涛. CO2激光光栅式扫描修复熔石英表面缺陷的实验研究与数值模拟. 物理学报, 2014, 63(6): 068105. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.068105
    [9] 刘春明, 杨亮, 晏中华, 蒋勇, 王海军, 廖威, 向霞, 贺少勃, 吕海兵, 袁晓东, 郑万国, 祖小涛. CO2激光局域辐照对熔石英损伤特性的影响. 物理学报, 2013, 62(9): 094701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.094701
    [10] 章春来, 王治国, 向霞, 刘春明, 李莉, 袁晓东, 贺少勃, 祖小涛. 熔石英后表面坑点型划痕对光场调制的近场模拟. 物理学报, 2012, 61(11): 114210. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.114210
    [11] 刘红婕, 王凤蕊, 罗青, 张振, 黄进, 周信达, 蒋晓东, 吴卫东, 郑万国. K9和熔石英玻璃纳秒基频激光损伤特性的实验对比研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(7): 076103. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.076103
    [12] 章春来, 刘春明, 向霞, 戴威, 王治国, 李莉, 袁晓东, 贺少勃, 祖小涛. 裂纹或气泡对熔石英损伤修复坑场调制的近场模拟. 物理学报, 2012, 61(12): 124214. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.124214
    [13] 李熙斌, 袁晓东, 贺少勃, 吕海兵, 王海军, 向霞, 郑万国. 激光钝化对熔石英修复后损伤性能影响的实验研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(6): 064401. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.064401
    [14] 王坤鹏, 闫石. 不同荷电态替位缺陷Sp对磷酸二氢钾激光损伤的影响. 物理学报, 2011, 60(9): 097401. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.097401
    [15] 刘红婕, 周信达, 黄进, 王凤蕊, 蒋晓东, 黄竞, 吴卫东, 郑万国. 355 nm纳秒紫外激光辐照下熔石英前后表面损伤的对比研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(6): 065202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.065202
    [16] 赵兴海, 胡建平, 高杨, 潘峰, 马平. 真空条件下激光诱导光纤损伤特性研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(6): 3917-3923. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3917
    [17] 夏志林, 郭培涛, 薛亦渝, 黄才华, 李展望. 短脉冲激光诱导薄膜损伤的等离子体爆炸过程分析. 物理学报, 2010, 59(5): 3523-3530. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3523
    [18] 王凤蕊, 黄进, 刘红婕, 周信达, 蒋晓东, 吴卫东, 郑万国. 激光诱导HF酸刻蚀后熔石英后表面划痕的损伤行为研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(7): 5122-5127. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5122
    [19] 刘红婕, 黄进, 王凤蕊, 周信达, 蒋晓东, 吴卫东. 熔石英表面热致应力对激光损伤行为影响的研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(2): 1308-1313. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.1308
    [20] 郭少锋, 林文雄, 陆启生, 陈 燧, 林宗志, 邓少永, 朱永祥. 熔融石英玻璃受激布里渊散射效应实验研究. 物理学报, 2007, 56(4): 2218-2222. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2218
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4748
  • PDF下载量:  250
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-07-26
  • 修回日期:  2016-09-12
  • 刊出日期:  2016-12-05

/

返回文章
返回