-
Lyapunov指数是识别系统非线性动力学特征的重要标志, 但是目前的算法通用性不足且计算流程复杂. 本文在经典的Lyapunov指数算法的基础上, 基于摄动理论提出了一种适用于不连续系统的Lyapunov指数计算方法. 首先, 以系统状态参数初始值和沿相空间每个基本矢量的扰动量为初始条件, 确定相轨迹. 其次, 采取差商近似导数法, 获得Jacobi矩阵的近似矩阵. 然后, 对Jacobi矩阵进行特征值提取, 得到系统的Lyapunov指数谱. 最后, 将新算法应用到二自由度干摩擦冲击振荡器系统实例中, 并将计算结果与同步方法的计算结果进行对比, 对新算法的有效性进行验证. 该算法不仅适用于离散系统和连续时间系统, 而且能够快速计算复杂不连续系统的Lyapunov指数, 为确定复杂不连续系统的动力学行为提供了新思路.
-
关键词:
- Lyapunov指数 /
- 不连续系统 /
- 摄动理论
Lyapunov exponent is a significant symbol to identify the nonlinear dynamic characteristics of the system. However, most of algorithms are not universal enough and complex. According to the classic Lyapunov exponent algorithm and perturbation theory, in this paper we propose a new algorithm which can be used to compute Lyapunov exponents for discontinuous systems. Firstly, the initial value of the system state parameter and the disturbance of each basic vector along the phase space are taken as initial conditions to determine the phase trajectory. Secondly, the method of difference quotient approximate derivative is adopted to obtain the Jacobi matrix. Thirdly, the eigenvalues of the Jacobi matrix are calculated to obtain the Lyapunov exponent spectrum of the system. Finally, the algorithm in a two-degree-of-freedom system with impacts and friction is used, showing its effectiveness and correctness by comparing its results with the counterparts from the synchronization method. The algorithm can not only be used for discrete systems and continuous-time dynamic systems, but also quickly calculate the Lyapunov exponent of complex discontinuous systems, which provides a new idea for determining the dynamic behavior of complex discontinuous systems.-
Keywords:
- Lyapunov exponent /
- discontinuous system /
- perturbation theory
[1] 刘秉正, 彭建华 2004 非线性动力学 (北京: 高等教育出版社) 第403−408页
Liu B Z, Peng J H 2004 Nonlinear Dynamics (Beijing: Higher Education Press) pp403−408 (in Chinese)
[2] Benettin G, Galgani L, Strelcyn J M 1976 Phys. Rev. A 14 2338Google Scholar
[3] Shimada I, Nagashima T 1979 Prog. Theor. Phys. 61 1605Google Scholar
[4] Oseledets V I 1968 Tr. Mosk. Mat. Obs. 19 179
[5] Benettin G, Galgani L, Giorgilli A, Strelcyn J M 1980 Meccanica 15 9Google Scholar
[6] Benettin G, Galgani L, Giorgilli A, Strelcyn J M 1980 Meccanica 15 21Google Scholar
[7] Wolf A 1986 Nonlinear Science: Theory and Applications (Manchester: Manchester University Press) pp273–290
[8] Parker T S, Chua L O 1989 Practical Numerical Algorithms for Chaotic Systems (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) pp73−81
[9] Dabrowski A 2014 Nonlinear Dyn. 78 1601Google Scholar
[10] Balcerzak M, Pikunov D 2017 Mech. Eng. 21 985
[11] Balcerzak M, Dabrowski A, Pikunov D 2018 Nonlinear Dyn. 94 3053Google Scholar
[12] Dabrowski A, Balcerzak M, Pikunov D, Stefanski A 2020 Nonlinear Dyn. 102 1869Google Scholar
[13] Zhou S, Wang X Y 2021 Physica A 563 125478Google Scholar
[14] Hinrichs N, Oestreich M, Popp K 1998 J. Sound Vib. 216 435Google Scholar
[15] Liao H T 2016 J. Comput. Phys. 313 57Google Scholar
[16] Zhou S, Wang X Y, Wang Z, Zhang C 2019 Chaos 29 033125Google Scholar
[17] Takens F 1981 Lect. Notes Math. 898 366Google Scholar
[18] Wolf A, Swift J B, Swinney H L, Vastano J A 1985 Physica D 16 285Google Scholar
[19] Rosenstein M T, Collins J J, De Luca C J 1993 Physica D 65 117Google Scholar
[20] Kantz H 1994 Phys. Lett. A 185 77Google Scholar
[21] 杨绍清, 章新华, 赵长安 2000 物理学报 49 636Google Scholar
Yang S Q, Zhang X H, Zhao C A 2000 Acta Phys. Sin. 49 636Google Scholar
[22] 卢山, 王海燕 2006 物理学报 55 572Google Scholar
Lu S, Wang H Y 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 572Google Scholar
[23] 周双, 冯勇, 吴文渊, 汪维华 2016 物理学报 65 020502Google Scholar
Zhou S, Feng Y, Wu W Y, Wang W H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 020502Google Scholar
[24] Pathak J, Lu Z X, Hunt B R, Girvan M, Ott E 2017 Chaos 27 121102Google Scholar
[25] Zhou S, Wang X Y 2018 Chaos 28 123118Google Scholar
[26] Shimizu T P, Takeuchi K A 2018 Chaos 28 121103Google Scholar
[27] Krishnamurthy K, Manoharan S C, Swaminathan R 2020 J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 11 3329Google Scholar
[28] Stefański A, Kapitaniak T 2003 Chaos Solitons Fractals 15 233Google Scholar
[29] Jin L, Lu Q S, Twizell E H 2006 J. Sound Vibr. 298 1019Google Scholar
[30] Gritli H, Belghith S 2015 Chaos Solitons Fractals 81 172Google Scholar
[31] 李清都, 郭建丽 2014 物理学报 63 100501Google Scholar
Li Q D, Guo J L 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 100501Google Scholar
[32] Stefański A, Kapitaniak T 2000 Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 4 207Google Scholar
[33] Stefański A 2000 Chaos Solitons Fractals 11 2443Google Scholar
[34] Stefański A, Dabrowski A, Kapitaniak T 2005 Chaos Solitons Fractals 23 1651Google Scholar
[35] [36] Baumann M, Leine R I 2017 Procedia IUTAM 20 26Google Scholar
[37] Barreto Netto D M, Brandão A, Paiva A, Pacheco P M, Savi M A 2020 J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42 475Google Scholar
-
图 5 二自由度干摩擦冲击振荡器系统的分叉图和3个最大Lyapunov指数图 (a) 状态变量
$ {y_1} $ ; (b) 状态变量$ {y_2} $ ; (c) 状态变量$ {y_3} $ Fig. 5. Bifurcation diagram and the corresponding diagram of the three largest Lyapunov exponents of the 2-DoF mechanical oscillator system with impacts and friction: (a) State variable
$ {y_1} $ ; (b) state variable$ {y_2} $ ; (c) state variable$ {y_3} $ . -
[1] 刘秉正, 彭建华 2004 非线性动力学 (北京: 高等教育出版社) 第403−408页
Liu B Z, Peng J H 2004 Nonlinear Dynamics (Beijing: Higher Education Press) pp403−408 (in Chinese)
[2] Benettin G, Galgani L, Strelcyn J M 1976 Phys. Rev. A 14 2338Google Scholar
[3] Shimada I, Nagashima T 1979 Prog. Theor. Phys. 61 1605Google Scholar
[4] Oseledets V I 1968 Tr. Mosk. Mat. Obs. 19 179
[5] Benettin G, Galgani L, Giorgilli A, Strelcyn J M 1980 Meccanica 15 9Google Scholar
[6] Benettin G, Galgani L, Giorgilli A, Strelcyn J M 1980 Meccanica 15 21Google Scholar
[7] Wolf A 1986 Nonlinear Science: Theory and Applications (Manchester: Manchester University Press) pp273–290
[8] Parker T S, Chua L O 1989 Practical Numerical Algorithms for Chaotic Systems (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) pp73−81
[9] Dabrowski A 2014 Nonlinear Dyn. 78 1601Google Scholar
[10] Balcerzak M, Pikunov D 2017 Mech. Eng. 21 985
[11] Balcerzak M, Dabrowski A, Pikunov D 2018 Nonlinear Dyn. 94 3053Google Scholar
[12] Dabrowski A, Balcerzak M, Pikunov D, Stefanski A 2020 Nonlinear Dyn. 102 1869Google Scholar
[13] Zhou S, Wang X Y 2021 Physica A 563 125478Google Scholar
[14] Hinrichs N, Oestreich M, Popp K 1998 J. Sound Vib. 216 435Google Scholar
[15] Liao H T 2016 J. Comput. Phys. 313 57Google Scholar
[16] Zhou S, Wang X Y, Wang Z, Zhang C 2019 Chaos 29 033125Google Scholar
[17] Takens F 1981 Lect. Notes Math. 898 366Google Scholar
[18] Wolf A, Swift J B, Swinney H L, Vastano J A 1985 Physica D 16 285Google Scholar
[19] Rosenstein M T, Collins J J, De Luca C J 1993 Physica D 65 117Google Scholar
[20] Kantz H 1994 Phys. Lett. A 185 77Google Scholar
[21] 杨绍清, 章新华, 赵长安 2000 物理学报 49 636Google Scholar
Yang S Q, Zhang X H, Zhao C A 2000 Acta Phys. Sin. 49 636Google Scholar
[22] 卢山, 王海燕 2006 物理学报 55 572Google Scholar
Lu S, Wang H Y 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 572Google Scholar
[23] 周双, 冯勇, 吴文渊, 汪维华 2016 物理学报 65 020502Google Scholar
Zhou S, Feng Y, Wu W Y, Wang W H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 020502Google Scholar
[24] Pathak J, Lu Z X, Hunt B R, Girvan M, Ott E 2017 Chaos 27 121102Google Scholar
[25] Zhou S, Wang X Y 2018 Chaos 28 123118Google Scholar
[26] Shimizu T P, Takeuchi K A 2018 Chaos 28 121103Google Scholar
[27] Krishnamurthy K, Manoharan S C, Swaminathan R 2020 J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 11 3329Google Scholar
[28] Stefański A, Kapitaniak T 2003 Chaos Solitons Fractals 15 233Google Scholar
[29] Jin L, Lu Q S, Twizell E H 2006 J. Sound Vibr. 298 1019Google Scholar
[30] Gritli H, Belghith S 2015 Chaos Solitons Fractals 81 172Google Scholar
[31] 李清都, 郭建丽 2014 物理学报 63 100501Google Scholar
Li Q D, Guo J L 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 100501Google Scholar
[32] Stefański A, Kapitaniak T 2000 Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 4 207Google Scholar
[33] Stefański A 2000 Chaos Solitons Fractals 11 2443Google Scholar
[34] Stefański A, Dabrowski A, Kapitaniak T 2005 Chaos Solitons Fractals 23 1651Google Scholar
[35] [36] Baumann M, Leine R I 2017 Procedia IUTAM 20 26Google Scholar
[37] Barreto Netto D M, Brandão A, Paiva A, Pacheco P M, Savi M A 2020 J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42 475Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 4167
- PDF下载量: 75
- 被引次数: 0