搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

二维气体模型中的负微分热阻

黄礼胜 罗荣祥

引用本文:
Citation:

二维气体模型中的负微分热阻

黄礼胜, 罗荣祥

Negative differential thermal resistance in a two-dimensional gas model

Huang Li-Sheng, Luo Rong-Xiang
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 负微分热阻效应是指在一个热输运系统中增大热流驱动力热流反倒减小的现象. 理解和控制非平衡热输运系统中的负微分热阻效应, 并利用其设计制造新功能热器件是科学技术的前沿挑战, 有着重要的理论意义和应用前景. 相对晶格模型中的负微分热阻研究而言, 流体模型中的负微分热阻性质还亟待认知. 本文选用由多粒子碰撞动力学描述的二维气体模型为研究对象, 理论证明了热库对气体粒子运动的约束是诱导负微分热阻的一个新机制, 并通过非平衡分子动力学方法揭示了该机制仅适用于弱相互作用的小尺寸系统. 这些结果为气体模型能表现出负微分热阻现象提供了微观机制的支持, 同时也为开发新的应用提供了新思路.
    The negative differential thermal resistance (NDTR) effect refers to a phenomenon that may take place in a heat transport system where the heat current counterintuitively decreases as the temperature difference between heat baths increases. Understanding and controlling the NDTR properties of out-of-equilibrium systems and using them to design new functional thermal devices are the major challenges of modern science and technology, which has important theoretical significance and application prospects. Up to now, the various lattice models representing solid materials have been taken to study the NDTR properties, but the fluid models have not received enough attention. It has recently been shown that in one-dimensional hard-point gas models representing fluids, there is a mechanism for NDTR induced by heat baths. The mechanism for NDTR in such a system depends on the simple fact that decreasing the temperature of the cold bath can weaken the motion of particles and decrease the collision rate between particles and the hot bath, thus impeding thermal exchange between the cold and hot baths. In this paper, we study how this mechanism works in more general two-dimensional gas models described by multi-particle collision dynamics. The gas models we consider are in a finite rectangular region of two-dimensional space with each end in contact with a heat bath. Based on the analytical results and numerical simulations, we show that the mechanism underlying NDTR induced by heat baths is also in effect for two-dimensional gas models and is applicable for describing systems with small sizes and weak interactions. Our result, together with that previously obtained in one-dimensional gas models, provides strong evidence that gas systems can exhibit NDTR by decreasing the temperature of the heat bath, which sheds new light on the exploring direction for developing various fluidic thermal control devices.
      通信作者: 罗荣祥, phyluorx@fzu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 12105049)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Luo Rong-Xiang, phyluorx@fzu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12105049)
    [1]

    Li N B, Ren J, Wang L, Zhang G, Hänggi P, Li B W 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 1045Google Scholar

    [2]

    Lepri S 2016 Thermal Transport in Low Dimensions: From Statistical Physics to Nanoscale Heat Transfer (Berlin: Springer)

    [3]

    Benenti G, Lepri S, Livi R 2020 Front. Phys. 8 292Google Scholar

    [4]

    Zhang Z W, Ouyang Y L, Cheng Y, Chen J, Li N B, Zhang G 2020 Phys. Rep. 860 1Google Scholar

    [5]

    Yang S, Wang J, Dai G L, Yang F B, Huang J P 2021 Phys. Rep. 908 1Google Scholar

    [6]

    赵鸿, 王矫, 张勇, 贺达海, 符维成 2021 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 51 030012Google Scholar

    Zhao H, Wang J, Zhang Y, He D H, Fu W C 2021 Sci Sin-Phys. Mech. Astron. 51 030012Google Scholar

    [7]

    吴祥水, 汤雯婷, 徐象繁 2020 物理学报 69 196602Google Scholar

    Wu X S, Tang W T, Xu X F 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 196602Google Scholar

    [8]

    Li B W, Wang L, Casati G 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 184301Google Scholar

    [9]

    Li B W, Wang L, Casati G 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 143501Google Scholar

    [10]

    Chang C, Okawa D, Majumdar A, Zettl A 2006 Science 314 1121Google Scholar

    [11]

    Wang L, Li B W 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 177208Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wang L, Li B W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 267203Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wu J P, Wang L, Li B W 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 061112Google Scholar

    [14]

    Yang N, Li N B, Wang L, Li B W 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 020301(RGoogle Scholar

    [15]

    Pereira E 2010 Phys. Rev. E 82 040101(R

    [16]

    He D H, Buyukdagli S, Hu B B 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 104302Google Scholar

    [17]

    He D H, Ai B Q, Chan H K 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 041131Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zhong W R 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 061131Google Scholar

    [19]

    Zhong W R, Zhang M P, Ai B Q, Hu B B 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 031130Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhong W R, Yang P, Ai B Q, Shao Z G, Hu B B 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 050103(RGoogle Scholar

    [21]

    Zhao Z G, Yang L, Chan H K, Hu B B 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 061119Google Scholar

    [22]

    Segal D, Yang L, Chan H K, Hu B B 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 205415Google Scholar

    [23]

    Lo W C, Wang L, Li B W 2008 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77 054402Google Scholar

    [24]

    Chan H K, He D H, Hu B B 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 052126

    [25]

    Fu W C, Jin T, He D H, Qu S X 2014 Physica A 433 211

    [26]

    Mendonca M, Pereira E 2015 Phys. Lett. A 379 1983Google Scholar

    [27]

    Ruan Q L, Wang L 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 023087Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yang Y, Ma D K, Zhao Y S, Zhang L F 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 127 195301Google Scholar

    [29]

    Luo R X 2019 Phys. Rev. E 99 032138Google Scholar

    [30]

    Gompper G, Ihle T, Kroll D M, Winkler R G 2009 Multi-Particle Collision Dynamics: A Particle-Based Mesoscale Simulation Approach to the Hydrodynamics of Complex Fluids (Berlin: Springer)

    [31]

    Cintio D P, Livi R, Lepri S, Ciraolo G 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 043203Google Scholar

    [32]

    Luo R X, Benenti G, Casati G, Wang J 2020 Phys. Rev. Research 2 022009(RGoogle Scholar

    [33]

    Lebowitz J L, Spohn H 1978 J. Stat. Phys. 19 633Google Scholar

    [34]

    Tehver T, Toigo F, Koplik J, Banavar J R 1998 Phys. Rev. E 57 17(RGoogle Scholar

    [35]

    Luo R X 2020 Phys. Rev. E 102 052104Google Scholar

    [36]

    Luo R X, Huang L S, Lepri S 2021 Phys. Rev. E 103 L050102Google Scholar

    [37]

    Squires T M, Quake S R 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 977Google Scholar

    [38]

    Schoch R B, Han J, Renaud P 2008 Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 839Google Scholar

    [39]

    Li L, Mo J, Li Z 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 134503Google Scholar

    [40]

    Hu B B, Yang L, Zhang Y 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 124302Google Scholar

    [41]

    王军, 李京颍, 郑志刚 2010 物理学报 59 476Google Scholar

    Wang J, Li J Y, Zheng Z G 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 476Google Scholar

    [42]

    Wang J, Zheng Z G 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 011114Google Scholar

    [43]

    Brantut J P, Grenier C, Meineke J, Stadler D, Krinner S, Kollath C, Esslinger T, Georges A 2013 Science 342 713Google Scholar

  • 图 1  由多粒子碰撞动力学描述的与热库耦合的二维气体模型示意图

    Fig. 1.  Schematic drawing of the two-dimensional gas model described by the multi-particle collision dynamics. The system is coupled at its left- and right-hand ends to two thermal baths of fixed temperature $T_{\rm{L}}$ and $T_{\rm{R}}$. The $ x $ coordinate goes along the channel and $ y $ is perpendicular to it

    图 2  不同时间间隔$ \tau $下, 热流$ J $与温差$ \Delta T $的函数关系. 红色曲线为(12)式给出的解析结果, 符号数据点是系统尺寸$ L = 64 $时的数值结果. 黑色点虚线是出现负微分热阻现象的参考线

    Fig. 2.  The heat current $ J $ as a function of temperature difference $ \Delta T $ for various time interval $ \tau $. The red curve is the analytical result given by Eq. (12). The symbols are for the numerical results and obtained for $ L = 64 $, and the black dashed line is drawn for reference

    图 3  不同系统尺寸L下, 热流$ J $与温差$ \Delta T $的函数关系. 这里时间间隔$ \tau = 1.0 $

    Fig. 3.  The heat current $ J $ as a function of temperature difference $ \Delta T $ for various system size L. Here we set $ \tau = 1.0 $

  • [1]

    Li N B, Ren J, Wang L, Zhang G, Hänggi P, Li B W 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 1045Google Scholar

    [2]

    Lepri S 2016 Thermal Transport in Low Dimensions: From Statistical Physics to Nanoscale Heat Transfer (Berlin: Springer)

    [3]

    Benenti G, Lepri S, Livi R 2020 Front. Phys. 8 292Google Scholar

    [4]

    Zhang Z W, Ouyang Y L, Cheng Y, Chen J, Li N B, Zhang G 2020 Phys. Rep. 860 1Google Scholar

    [5]

    Yang S, Wang J, Dai G L, Yang F B, Huang J P 2021 Phys. Rep. 908 1Google Scholar

    [6]

    赵鸿, 王矫, 张勇, 贺达海, 符维成 2021 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 51 030012Google Scholar

    Zhao H, Wang J, Zhang Y, He D H, Fu W C 2021 Sci Sin-Phys. Mech. Astron. 51 030012Google Scholar

    [7]

    吴祥水, 汤雯婷, 徐象繁 2020 物理学报 69 196602Google Scholar

    Wu X S, Tang W T, Xu X F 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 196602Google Scholar

    [8]

    Li B W, Wang L, Casati G 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 184301Google Scholar

    [9]

    Li B W, Wang L, Casati G 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 143501Google Scholar

    [10]

    Chang C, Okawa D, Majumdar A, Zettl A 2006 Science 314 1121Google Scholar

    [11]

    Wang L, Li B W 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 177208Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wang L, Li B W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 267203Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wu J P, Wang L, Li B W 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 061112Google Scholar

    [14]

    Yang N, Li N B, Wang L, Li B W 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 020301(RGoogle Scholar

    [15]

    Pereira E 2010 Phys. Rev. E 82 040101(R

    [16]

    He D H, Buyukdagli S, Hu B B 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 104302Google Scholar

    [17]

    He D H, Ai B Q, Chan H K 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 041131Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zhong W R 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 061131Google Scholar

    [19]

    Zhong W R, Zhang M P, Ai B Q, Hu B B 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 031130Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhong W R, Yang P, Ai B Q, Shao Z G, Hu B B 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 050103(RGoogle Scholar

    [21]

    Zhao Z G, Yang L, Chan H K, Hu B B 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 061119Google Scholar

    [22]

    Segal D, Yang L, Chan H K, Hu B B 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 205415Google Scholar

    [23]

    Lo W C, Wang L, Li B W 2008 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77 054402Google Scholar

    [24]

    Chan H K, He D H, Hu B B 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 052126

    [25]

    Fu W C, Jin T, He D H, Qu S X 2014 Physica A 433 211

    [26]

    Mendonca M, Pereira E 2015 Phys. Lett. A 379 1983Google Scholar

    [27]

    Ruan Q L, Wang L 2020 Phys. Rev. Res. 2 023087Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yang Y, Ma D K, Zhao Y S, Zhang L F 2020 J. Appl. Phys. 127 195301Google Scholar

    [29]

    Luo R X 2019 Phys. Rev. E 99 032138Google Scholar

    [30]

    Gompper G, Ihle T, Kroll D M, Winkler R G 2009 Multi-Particle Collision Dynamics: A Particle-Based Mesoscale Simulation Approach to the Hydrodynamics of Complex Fluids (Berlin: Springer)

    [31]

    Cintio D P, Livi R, Lepri S, Ciraolo G 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 043203Google Scholar

    [32]

    Luo R X, Benenti G, Casati G, Wang J 2020 Phys. Rev. Research 2 022009(RGoogle Scholar

    [33]

    Lebowitz J L, Spohn H 1978 J. Stat. Phys. 19 633Google Scholar

    [34]

    Tehver T, Toigo F, Koplik J, Banavar J R 1998 Phys. Rev. E 57 17(RGoogle Scholar

    [35]

    Luo R X 2020 Phys. Rev. E 102 052104Google Scholar

    [36]

    Luo R X, Huang L S, Lepri S 2021 Phys. Rev. E 103 L050102Google Scholar

    [37]

    Squires T M, Quake S R 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 977Google Scholar

    [38]

    Schoch R B, Han J, Renaud P 2008 Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 839Google Scholar

    [39]

    Li L, Mo J, Li Z 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 134503Google Scholar

    [40]

    Hu B B, Yang L, Zhang Y 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 124302Google Scholar

    [41]

    王军, 李京颍, 郑志刚 2010 物理学报 59 476Google Scholar

    Wang J, Li J Y, Zheng Z G 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 476Google Scholar

    [42]

    Wang J, Zheng Z G 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 011114Google Scholar

    [43]

    Brantut J P, Grenier C, Meineke J, Stadler D, Krinner S, Kollath C, Esslinger T, Georges A 2013 Science 342 713Google Scholar

  • [1] 邹云鹏, 陈锡熊, 陈伟. 临界梯度模型的优化及集成模拟中高能量粒子模块的搭建. 物理学报, 2023, 72(21): 215206. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230681
    [2] 廖晶晶, 康琦, 罗飞, 蔺福军. 温差条件下包含手征活性粒子的封闭圆环的输运. 物理学报, 2023, 72(3): 030501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221772
    [3] 李维勤, 霍志胜, 蒲红斌. 电介质/半导体结构样品电子束感生电流瞬态特性. 物理学报, 2020, 69(6): 060201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191543
    [4] 张世忠. 量子气体中的输运行为. 物理学报, 2019, 68(4): 040302. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181966
    [5] 霍志胜, 蒲红斌, 李维勤. 高能透射电子束照射聚合物薄膜的带电效应. 物理学报, 2019, 68(23): 230201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191112
    [6] 于晓洋, 冯红磊, 辜刚旭, 刘永河, 李治林, 徐同帅, 李永庆. 层状铁磁体Fe0.26TaS2的Andreev反射谱. 物理学报, 2019, 68(24): 247201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191221
    [7] 周欣, 高仁斌, 谭仕华, 彭小芳, 蒋湘涛, 包本刚. 多空穴错位分布对石墨纳米带中热输运的影响. 物理学报, 2017, 66(12): 126302. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.126302
    [8] 张婷婷, 成蒙, 杨蓉, 张广宇. 锯齿形石墨烯反点网络加工与输运性质研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(21): 216103. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.216103
    [9] 卿前军, 周欣, 谢芳, 陈丽群, 王新军, 谭仕华, 彭小芳. 多通道石墨纳米带中弹性声学声子输运和热导特性. 物理学报, 2016, 65(8): 086301. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.086301
    [10] 陈兆权, 殷志祥, 陈明功, 刘明海, 徐公林, 胡业林, 夏广庆, 宋晓, 贾晓芬, 胡希伟. 负偏压离子鞘及气体压强影响表面波放电过程的粒子模拟. 物理学报, 2014, 63(9): 095205. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.095205
    [11] 李树, 邓力, 田东风, 李刚. 基于能量密度分布的辐射源粒子空间抽样方法研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(23): 239501. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.239501
    [12] 史宏云, 陈贺胜. 单电子在含有双能级原子的空腔中的输运行为. 物理学报, 2012, 61(2): 020301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.020301
    [13] 叶伏秋, 李科敏, 彭小芳. 低温下多通道量子结构中的弹性声子输运和热导. 物理学报, 2011, 60(3): 036806. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.036806
    [14] 陈文钦, 海文华, 李 辉, 马志英. 脉冲式棘齿势场作用下囚禁离子的规则与混沌运动. 物理学报, 2007, 56(3): 1305-1312. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1305
    [15] 贺梦冬, 龚志强. 多层异质结构中的声学声子输运. 物理学报, 2007, 56(3): 1415-1421. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1415
    [16] 王光昶, 郑志坚, 谷渝秋, 陈 涛, 张 婷. 利用渡越辐射研究超热电子在固体靶中的输运过程. 物理学报, 2007, 56(2): 982-987. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.982
    [17] 王本阳, 千正男, 隋 郁, 刘玉强, 苏文辉, 张 铭, 柳祝红, 刘国栋, 吴光恒. Heusler合金Cu2VAl磁性及输运性质的研究. 物理学报, 2005, 54(7): 3386-3390. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3386
    [18] 郭建军. 惰性气体输运性质的理论计算. 物理学报, 2002, 51(3): 497-500. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.497
    [19] 王德真, 马腾才. 重粒子在阴极鞘层中输运的理论模型. 物理学报, 2000, 49(12): 2404-2407. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.2404
    [20] 展永, 包景东, 卓益忠, 吴锡真. 布朗马达的定向输运模型. 物理学报, 1997, 46(10): 1880-1887. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.1880
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2745
  • PDF下载量:  103
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-07-24
  • 修回日期:  2022-09-29
  • 上网日期:  2022-10-18
  • 刊出日期:  2023-01-05

/

返回文章
返回