搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

激光诱导熔石英表面损伤修复中的气泡形成和控制研究

张丽娟 张传超 陈静 白阳 蒋一岚 蒋晓龙 王海军 栾晓雨 袁晓东 廖威

引用本文:
Citation:

激光诱导熔石英表面损伤修复中的气泡形成和控制研究

张丽娟, 张传超, 陈静, 白阳, 蒋一岚, 蒋晓龙, 王海军, 栾晓雨, 袁晓东, 廖威

Formation and control of bubbles during the mitigation of laser-induced damage on fused silica surface

Zhang Li-Juan, Zhang Chuan-Chao, Chen Jing, Bai Yang, Jiang Yi-Lan, Jiang Xiao-Long, Wang Hai-Jun, Luan Xiao-Yu, Yuan Xiao-Dong, Liao Wei
PDF
导出引用
  • 基于熔石英材料在CO2激光作用下的温度分布和结构参数变化的计算结果,对熔石英损伤修复中的气泡形成和控制进行了研究.针对损伤尺寸介于150250 m之间的损伤点,提出了一种能够有效控制气泡形成的长时间低温预热修复方法.基于低温下熔石英材料结构弛豫时间常数较长的特点,该方法在不引起熔石英材料结构发生显著变化的同时,能够解吸附表面和裂纹处所附着的气体和杂质,可有效降低裂纹闭合过程中气泡形成的概率.实验结果表明,长时间低温预热修复方法的成功修复概率可达到98%.
    Surface damage on fused silica optics initiated by high fluence 351 nm laser is one of the major bottlenecks for the high power laser systems, such as, Shenguang Ⅲ (SG-Ⅲ) laser facility. Generally, the CO2 laser, which is strongly absorbed by fused silica and thus can effectively heat fused silica above melting temperature, is used to locally mitigate the damages, called the non-evaporative mitigation method. However, subsurface bubbles may be introduced in the damage mitigation process by CO2 laser melting. Unfortunately, the mitigated damage sites with subsurface bubbles can be easily re-initiated upon subsequent laser shots. In this article, in order to eliminate the subsurface bubbles, we systematically investigate the influences of mitigation protocols in different ways of laser irradiation preheating on the formation and control of subsurface bubbles. Based on the simulated results of the temperature distribution and structural changes under CO2 laser irradiation, two CO2 laser-based non-evaporative mitigation methods are proposed, which are adopted for the mitigation of surface damage sites ranging in size from 150 m to 250 m, and systematically investigated to assess the effect of eliminating subsurface bubbles. The process of mitigation method I is that multiple laser irradiations with short time and increasing power are initially used to preheat the damage site and then a higher power laser irradiation is adopted to mitigate the damage site. The process of mitigation method Ⅱ is that a long time, low power laser irradiation is first used to preheat the damage site and then a high power laser irradiation is adopted to mitigate the damage site. The detailed morphologies of the mitigation sites and subsurface bubbles produced by the two mitigation methods are measured by optical microscope with high magnification. A large number of small subsurface bubbles are observed in mitigation method I. While, less subsurface bubbles are observed in mitigation method Ⅱ. The statistical results indicate that among the thirty-four mitigated sites, only eight have no surface bubbles in method I. In contrast, among the fifty-four mitigated sites, forty-nine have no surface bubbles in mitigation method Ⅱ. The experimental results suggest that the formation probability of subsurface bubbles is effectively suppressed by the mitigation method Ⅱ. The mechanism of eliminating subsurface bubbles in the mitigation method Ⅱ is discussed based on the structural changes of the fused silica in the mitigation process. It is found that the fused silica is not melted by the long time, low power laser irradiation, which means that a long time preheating without melting could provide enough time to effectively reject air and impurities enwrapping in cracks, and thus reducing the formation probability of subsurface bubbles in the form of the crack closing due to rapid melting. With the mitigation method Ⅱ, the probability of mitigated sites without subsurface bubbles can reach 98%.
      通信作者: 廖威, liaowei@caep.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(批准号:11404301,61505185)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Liao Wei, liaowei@caep.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11404301, 61505185).
    [1]

    Salleo A, Genin F Y, Yoshiyama J, Stolz C J, Kozlowski M R 1998 Proc. SPIE 3224 341

    [2]

    Raze G, Morchain J M, Loiseau M, Lamaignere L, Josse M A, Bercegol H 2003 Proc. SPIE 4932 127

    [3]

    Suratwala T I, Miller P E, Bude J D, Steele W A, Shen N, Monticelli M V, Feit M D, Laurence T A, Norton M A, Carr C W, Wong L L 2011 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94 416

    [4]

    Norton M A, Hrubesh L W, Wu Z, Donohue E E, Feit M D, Kozlowski M R, Milam D, Neeb K P, Molander W A, Rubenchik A M, Sell W D, Wegner P 2001 Proc. SPIE 4347 468

    [5]

    Brusasco R M, Penetrante B M, Butler J A, Hrubesh L W 2002 Proc. SPIE 4679 40

    [6]

    Mendez E, Nowak K M, Baker H J, Villarreal F J, Hall D R 2006 Appl Opt. 45 5358

    [7]

    Liu C M, Yang L, Yan Z H, Jiang Y, Wang H J, Liao W, Xiang X, He S B, L H B, Yuan X D, Zheng W G, Zu X T 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 094701(in Chinese) [刘春明, 杨亮, 晏中华, 蒋勇, 王海军, 廖威, 向霞, 贺少勃, 吕海兵, 袁晓东, 郑万国, 祖小涛 2013 物理学报 62 094701]

    [8]

    Bouchut P, Delrive L, Decruppe D, Garrec P 2004 Proc. SPIE 5252 122

    [9]

    Adams J J, Bolourchi M, Bude J D, Guss G M, Matthews M J, Nostrand M C 2010 Proc. SPIE 7842 784223

    [10]

    Liu H J, Huang J, Wang F R, Zhou X D, Jiang X D, Wu W D 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 1308(in Chinese) [刘红婕, 黄进, 王凤蕊, 周信达, 蒋晓东, 吴卫东 2010 物理学报 59 1308]

    [11]

    Zhang C C, Liao W, Zhang L J, Ye Y Y, Chen J, Wang H J, Luan X Y, Yuan X D 2014 Adv. Cond. Matter Phys. 2014 638045

    [12]

    Jiang Y, Zhou Q, Qiu R, Gao X, Wang H L, Yao C Z, Wang J B, Zhao X, Liu C M, Xiang X, Zu X T, Yuan X D, Miao X X 2016 Chin. Phys.. 25 108104

    [13]

    Guss G, Bass I, Draggoo V, Hackel R, Payne S, Lancaster M, Mak P 2006 Proc. SPIE 6403 64030M

    [14]

    Jiang Y, Qiu R, Yang Y J, Liao W, Wang H J, Yuan X D, Liu C M, Xiang X, Zu X T 2014 J. Optoelectronics Laser 25 1326(in Chinese) [蒋勇, 邱荣, 杨永佳, 廖威, 王海军, 袁晓东, 刘春明, 向霞, 祖小涛 2014 光电子激光 25 1326]

    [15]

    Yang S T, Matthews M J, Elhadj S, Cooke D, Guss G M, Draggoo V G, Wegner P J 2010 Appl. Opt. 49 2606

    [16]

    Feit M D, Rubenchik A M 2002 Proc. SPIE 4932 91

    [17]

    Mendez E, Nowak K M, Baker H J, Villarreal F J, Hall D R 2006 Appl. Opt. 45 5358

    [18]

    Jiang Y, He S B, Yuan X D, Wang H J, Liao W, L H B, Liu C M, Xiang X, Qiu R, Yang Y J, Zheng W G, Zu X T 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 068105(in Chinese) [蒋勇, 贺少勃, 袁晓东, 王海军, 廖威, 吕海兵, 刘春明, 向霞, 邱荣, 杨永佳, 郑万国, 祖小涛 2014 物理学报 63 068105]

    [19]

    Zhao J, Sullivan J, Zayac J, Bennett T D 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 95 5475

    [20]

    Doremus R H 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 92 7619

  • [1]

    Salleo A, Genin F Y, Yoshiyama J, Stolz C J, Kozlowski M R 1998 Proc. SPIE 3224 341

    [2]

    Raze G, Morchain J M, Loiseau M, Lamaignere L, Josse M A, Bercegol H 2003 Proc. SPIE 4932 127

    [3]

    Suratwala T I, Miller P E, Bude J D, Steele W A, Shen N, Monticelli M V, Feit M D, Laurence T A, Norton M A, Carr C W, Wong L L 2011 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94 416

    [4]

    Norton M A, Hrubesh L W, Wu Z, Donohue E E, Feit M D, Kozlowski M R, Milam D, Neeb K P, Molander W A, Rubenchik A M, Sell W D, Wegner P 2001 Proc. SPIE 4347 468

    [5]

    Brusasco R M, Penetrante B M, Butler J A, Hrubesh L W 2002 Proc. SPIE 4679 40

    [6]

    Mendez E, Nowak K M, Baker H J, Villarreal F J, Hall D R 2006 Appl Opt. 45 5358

    [7]

    Liu C M, Yang L, Yan Z H, Jiang Y, Wang H J, Liao W, Xiang X, He S B, L H B, Yuan X D, Zheng W G, Zu X T 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 094701(in Chinese) [刘春明, 杨亮, 晏中华, 蒋勇, 王海军, 廖威, 向霞, 贺少勃, 吕海兵, 袁晓东, 郑万国, 祖小涛 2013 物理学报 62 094701]

    [8]

    Bouchut P, Delrive L, Decruppe D, Garrec P 2004 Proc. SPIE 5252 122

    [9]

    Adams J J, Bolourchi M, Bude J D, Guss G M, Matthews M J, Nostrand M C 2010 Proc. SPIE 7842 784223

    [10]

    Liu H J, Huang J, Wang F R, Zhou X D, Jiang X D, Wu W D 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 1308(in Chinese) [刘红婕, 黄进, 王凤蕊, 周信达, 蒋晓东, 吴卫东 2010 物理学报 59 1308]

    [11]

    Zhang C C, Liao W, Zhang L J, Ye Y Y, Chen J, Wang H J, Luan X Y, Yuan X D 2014 Adv. Cond. Matter Phys. 2014 638045

    [12]

    Jiang Y, Zhou Q, Qiu R, Gao X, Wang H L, Yao C Z, Wang J B, Zhao X, Liu C M, Xiang X, Zu X T, Yuan X D, Miao X X 2016 Chin. Phys.. 25 108104

    [13]

    Guss G, Bass I, Draggoo V, Hackel R, Payne S, Lancaster M, Mak P 2006 Proc. SPIE 6403 64030M

    [14]

    Jiang Y, Qiu R, Yang Y J, Liao W, Wang H J, Yuan X D, Liu C M, Xiang X, Zu X T 2014 J. Optoelectronics Laser 25 1326(in Chinese) [蒋勇, 邱荣, 杨永佳, 廖威, 王海军, 袁晓东, 刘春明, 向霞, 祖小涛 2014 光电子激光 25 1326]

    [15]

    Yang S T, Matthews M J, Elhadj S, Cooke D, Guss G M, Draggoo V G, Wegner P J 2010 Appl. Opt. 49 2606

    [16]

    Feit M D, Rubenchik A M 2002 Proc. SPIE 4932 91

    [17]

    Mendez E, Nowak K M, Baker H J, Villarreal F J, Hall D R 2006 Appl. Opt. 45 5358

    [18]

    Jiang Y, He S B, Yuan X D, Wang H J, Liao W, L H B, Liu C M, Xiang X, Qiu R, Yang Y J, Zheng W G, Zu X T 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 068105(in Chinese) [蒋勇, 贺少勃, 袁晓东, 王海军, 廖威, 吕海兵, 刘春明, 向霞, 邱荣, 杨永佳, 郑万国, 祖小涛 2014 物理学报 63 068105]

    [19]

    Zhao J, Sullivan J, Zayac J, Bennett T D 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 95 5475

    [20]

    Doremus R H 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 92 7619

  • [1] 张学阳, 陈军, 胡望宇. 激光辐照下熔石英表面损伤的原子模拟. 物理学报, 2023, 72(15): 156201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230606
    [2] 刘崇, 季来林, 朱宝强, 林尊琪. 高功率激光终端KDP晶体非共线高效三倍频及远场色分离方案数值模拟分析. 物理学报, 2016, 65(14): 144202. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.144202
    [3] 白阳, 张丽娟, 廖威, 周海, 张传超, 陈静, 叶亚云, 蒋一岚, 王海军, 栾晓雨, 袁晓东, 郑万国. 熔石英损伤修复坑下游光场调制的数值模拟与实验研究. 物理学报, 2016, 65(2): 024205. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.024205
    [4] 蒋勇, 袁晓东, 王海军, 廖威, 刘春明, 向霞, 邱荣, 周强, 高翔, 杨永佳, 郑万国, 祖小涛, 苗心向. 退火对熔石英表面损伤修复点损伤增长的影响. 物理学报, 2016, 65(4): 044209. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.044209
    [5] 沈超, 程湘爱, 田野, 许中杰, 江天. 1064nm纳秒激光对熔石英元件后表面击穿的实验与数值研究. 物理学报, 2016, 65(15): 155201. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.155201
    [6] 韩伟, 冯斌, 郑奎兴, 朱启华, 郑万国, 巩马理. 高功率激光装置熔石英紫外损伤增长研究. 物理学报, 2016, 65(24): 246102. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.246102
    [7] 钟勉, 杨亮, 任玮, 向霞, 刘翔, 练友运, 徐世珍, 郭德成, 郑万国, 袁晓东. 高功率脉冲电子束辐照SiO2的光学和激光损伤性能. 物理学报, 2014, 63(24): 246103. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.246103
    [8] 蒋勇, 贺少勃, 袁晓东, 王海军, 廖威, 吕海兵, 刘春明, 向霞, 邱荣, 杨永佳, 郑万国, 祖小涛. CO2激光光栅式扫描修复熔石英表面缺陷的实验研究与数值模拟. 物理学报, 2014, 63(6): 068105. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.068105
    [9] 梁善勇, 王江安, 宗思光, 吴荣华, 马治国, 王晓宇, 王乐东. 基于多重散射强度和偏振特征的舰船尾流气泡激光探测方法. 物理学报, 2013, 62(6): 060704. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.060704
    [10] 刘春明, 杨亮, 晏中华, 蒋勇, 王海军, 廖威, 向霞, 贺少勃, 吕海兵, 袁晓东, 郑万国, 祖小涛. CO2激光局域辐照对熔石英损伤特性的影响. 物理学报, 2013, 62(9): 094701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.094701
    [11] 刘红婕, 王凤蕊, 罗青, 张振, 黄进, 周信达, 蒋晓东, 吴卫东, 郑万国. K9和熔石英玻璃纳秒基频激光损伤特性的实验对比研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(7): 076103. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.076103
    [12] 章春来, 刘春明, 向霞, 戴威, 王治国, 李莉, 袁晓东, 贺少勃, 祖小涛. 裂纹或气泡对熔石英损伤修复坑场调制的近场模拟. 物理学报, 2012, 61(12): 124214. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.124214
    [13] 王坤鹏, 闫石. 不同荷电态替位缺陷Sp对磷酸二氢钾激光损伤的影响. 物理学报, 2011, 60(9): 097401. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.097401
    [14] 刘红婕, 周信达, 黄进, 王凤蕊, 蒋晓东, 黄竞, 吴卫东, 郑万国. 355 nm纳秒紫外激光辐照下熔石英前后表面损伤的对比研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(6): 065202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.065202
    [15] 赵兴海, 胡建平, 高杨, 潘峰, 马平. 真空条件下激光诱导光纤损伤特性研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(6): 3917-3923. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3917
    [16] 夏志林, 郭培涛, 薛亦渝, 黄才华, 李展望. 短脉冲激光诱导薄膜损伤的等离子体爆炸过程分析. 物理学报, 2010, 59(5): 3523-3530. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3523
    [17] 王凤蕊, 黄进, 刘红婕, 周信达, 蒋晓东, 吴卫东, 郑万国. 激光诱导HF酸刻蚀后熔石英后表面划痕的损伤行为研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(7): 5122-5127. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5122
    [18] 刘红婕, 黄进, 王凤蕊, 周信达, 蒋晓东, 吴卫东. 熔石英表面热致应力对激光损伤行为影响的研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(2): 1308-1313. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.1308
    [19] 张华伟, 李言祥. 金属熔体中气泡形核的理论分析. 物理学报, 2007, 56(8): 4864-4871. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4864
    [20] 梁丽萍, 张 磊, 徐 耀, 章 斌, 吴 东, 孙予罕, 蒋晓东, 魏晓峰, 李志宏, 吴忠华. PVP掺杂-ZrO2溶胶-凝胶工艺制备多层激光高反射膜的研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(11): 6175-6184. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6175
计量
  • 文章访问数:  6495
  • PDF下载量:  206
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-08-14
  • 修回日期:  2017-09-30
  • 刊出日期:  2018-01-05

/

返回文章
返回