搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

高温吸热管内超临界CO2传热特性的数值模拟

庄晓如 徐心海 杨智 赵延兴 余鹏

引用本文:
Citation:

高温吸热管内超临界CO2传热特性的数值模拟

庄晓如, 徐心海, 杨智, 赵延兴, 余鹏

Numerical investigation on heat transfer of supercritical CO2 in solar receiver tube in high temperature region

Zhuang Xiao-Ru, Xu Xin-Hai, Yang Zhi, Zhao Yan-Xing, Yu Peng
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 研究超临界CO2在高温吸热管内的传热特性是将其应用于聚光太阳能热发电技术中的基础. 本文对此进行了数值模拟研究, 分析了流体温度、流动方向、系统压力、质量流率和热流密度对对流传热系数和Nu数的影响. 结果表明: 高温区 (800—1050 K) 的对流传热系数和Nu数受流动方向和系统压力的影响均很小, 但都随着质量流率的增大以及热流密度的减小而明显增大; 而随着流体温度的升高, 对流传热系数近似线性增大, Nu数则近似线性减小. 另外, 本文研究发现在高温区可忽略浮升力对传热的影响, 而由高热流密度引起的流动加速效应会明显恶化传热. 最后, 选取了八种管内超临界流体传热关联式与模拟结果进行对比, 发现使用基于热物性修正的关联式对高温区传热数据预测的结果优于使用基于无量纲数修正的关联式得到的结果, 且其中预测效果最优的关联式得到的计算结果与模拟结果之间的平均绝对相对偏差为8.1%.
    Supercritical CO2 can be used as a heat transfer fluid in a solar receiver, especially for a concentrating solar thermal power tower system. Such applications require better understanding of the heat transfer characteristics of supercritical CO2 in the solar receiver tube in a high temperature region. However, most of the existing experimental and numerical studies of the heat transfer characteristics of supercritical CO2 in tubes near the critical temperature region, and the corresponding heat transfer characteristics in the high temperature region are conducted. In this paper, a three-dimensional steady-state numerical simulation with the standard k-ε turbulent model is established by using ANSYS FLUENT for the flow and heat transfer of supercritical CO2 in a heated circular tube with an inner diameter of 6 mm and a length of 500 mm in the high temperature region. The effects of the fluid temperature (823–1023 K), the flow direction (horizontal, downward and upward), the pressure (7.5–9 MPa), the mass flux (200–500 kg·m–2·s–1) and the heat flux (100–800 kW·m–2) on the convection heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt number are discussed. The results show that the convection heat transfer coefficient increases while Nusselt number decreases nearly linearly with fluid temperature increasing. Both fluid direction and pressure have negligible effects on the convection heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt number. Moreover, the convective heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt number are enhanced greatly with the increasing of mass flux and the decreasing of heat flux, which is more obvious at a higher heat flux. The influences of buoyancy and flow acceleration on the heat transfer characteristics are also investigated. The buoyancy effect can be ignored within the present parameter range. However, the flow acceleration induced by the high heat flux significantly deteriorates the heat transfer preformation. Moreover, eight heat transfer correlations of supercritical fluid in tubes are evaluated and compared with the present numerical data. The comparison indicates that the correlations based on the thermal property modification show better performance in the heat transfer prediction in the high temperature region than those based on the dimensionless number modification. And Nusselt number predicted by the best correlation has a mean absolute relative deviation of 8.1% compared with the present numerical results, with all predicted data points located in the deviation bandwidth of ±20%. The present work can provide a theoretical guidance for the optimal design and safe operation of concentrating solar receivers where supercritical CO2 is used as a heat transfer fluid.
      通信作者: 余鹏, yup6@sustech.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金 (批准号: 51706048) 和中国科学院低温工程学重点实验室 (理化技术研究所) (批准号: CRYO202002) 资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Yu Peng, yup6@sustech.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51706048) and CAS Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry (Grant No. CRYO202002)
    [1]

    Singh A S, Choudhary T, Sanjay S https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2019-01-1391/ [2020-9-20]

    [2]

    吴毅, 王佳莹, 王明坤, 戴义平 2016 西安交通大学学报 50 108Google Scholar

    Wu Y, Wang J Y, Wang M K, Dai Y P 2016 J. Xi'an Jiaotong Univ. 50 108Google Scholar

    [3]

    Turchi C S, Ma Z, Neises T W, Wagner M J 2013 J. Sol. Energy Eng. 135 041007Google Scholar

    [4]

    Neises T, Turchi C 2014 Energy Procedia 49 1187Google Scholar

    [5]

    黄凯欣, 饶政华, 廖胜明 2018 太阳能学报 39 44Google Scholar

    Huang X K, Rao Z H, Liao S M 2018 Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica 39 44Google Scholar

    [6]

    Benoit H, Spreafico L, Gauthier D, Flamant G 2016 Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 55 298Google Scholar

    [7]

    Mehos M, Turchi C, Vidal J, Wagner J, Ma Z, Ho C, Kolb W, Andraka C, Kruizenga A https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67464.pdf [2020-9-20]

    [8]

    Cabeza L F, de Gracia A, Fernández A I, Farid M M 2017 Appl. Therm. Eng. 125 799Google Scholar

    [9]

    Xie J, Liu D, Yan H, Xie G, Boetcher S K 2020 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 149 119233Google Scholar

    [10]

    Kim D E, Kim M H 2010 Nucl. Eng. Des. 240 3336Google Scholar

    [11]

    Bovard S, Abdi M, Nikou M R K, Daryasafar A 2017 J. Supercrit. Fluids 119 88Google Scholar

    [12]

    Qiu Y, Li M J, He Y L, Tao W Q 2016 Appl. Therm. Eng. 115 1255Google Scholar

    [13]

    刘占斌, 何雅玲, 王坤, 马朝, 姜涛 2019 化工学报 70 3329Google Scholar

    Liu Z B, He Y L, Wang K, Ma Z, Jiang T 2019 J. Chem. Ind. Eng. (China) 70 3329Google Scholar

    [14]

    Lemmon E W, Huber M L, McLinden M O http://www.nist.gov/srd/nist23.cfm [2020-9-20]

    [15]

    Launder B E, Spalding D B 1972 Mathematical Models of Turbulence (London: Academic Press) p169

    [16]

    Kim D E, Kim M H 2011 Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 32 176Google Scholar

    [17]

    Liu S, Huang Y, Liu G, Wang J, Leung L K 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 106 1144Google Scholar

    [18]

    Hall W B, Jackson J D 1969 Mech. Eng. 91 66

    [19]

    Zhang Q, Li H, Kong X, Liu J, Lei X 2018 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 122 469Google Scholar

    [20]

    Lei Y, Chen Z 2018 Int. J. Refrig. 90 46Google Scholar

    [21]

    Xiang M, Guo J, Huai X, Cui X 2017 J. Supercrit. Fluids 130 389Google Scholar

    [22]

    Xu R N, Luo F, Jiang P X 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 110 576Google Scholar

    [23]

    Bishop A A, Sandberg R O, Tong L S 1965 Report WCAP-2056 (Pittsburgh: Westinghouse Electric Corporation) p85

    [24]

    Kranoshchekov E A, Protopopov V S 1966 High Temp. 4 375

    [25]

    Jackson J D 2013 Nucl. Eng. Des. 264 24Google Scholar

    [26]

    Liao S M, Zhao T S 2002 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 45 5025Google Scholar

  • 图 1  CO2p = 7.5 MPa下的热物性变化 (a) T = 293—1050 K; (b) T = 293—350 K; (c) T = 800—1050 K

    Fig. 1.  Properties of CO2 at p = 7.5 MPa: (a) T = 293–1050 K; (b) T = 293–350 K; (c) T = 800–1050 K.

    图 2  CO2在高温区T = 800—1050 K, p = 7.5—9 MPa下的热物性变化 (a) 密度; (b) 比热; (c) 热导率; (d) 黏度

    Fig. 2.  Properties of CO2 at high temperature region of T = 800–1050 K with p = 7.5–9 MPa: (a) Density; (b) specific heat; (c) thermal conductivity; (d) viscosity.

    图 3  吸热管几何模型

    Fig. 3.  Geometric model of the solar receiver tube.

    图 4  吸热管三维模型网格划分 (网格数量: 841000)

    Fig. 4.  Mesh generation of the three-dimensional solar receiver tube (grid quantity: 841000).

    图 5  模型计算结果与文献[16]实验数据的对比 (a) 壁面温度; (b) 对流传热系数; 其中, 工况1, G = 868 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 231.0 kW·m–2, p = 9.22 MPa; 工况2, G = 873 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 216.2 kW·m–2, p = 9.09 MPa; 工况3, G = 874 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 191.8 kW·m–2, p = 8.71 MPa

    Fig. 5.  Comparisons between numerical results and experimental data of Ref. [16]: (a) Wall temperature; (b) convective heat transfer coefficient. Case 1: G = 868 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 231.0 kW·m–2, p = 9.22 MPa. Case 2: G = 873 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 216.2 kW·m–2, p = 9.09 MPa. Case 3: G = 874 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 191.8 kW·m–2, p = 8.71 MPa.

    图 6  管内流体温度和流动方向在高温区对超临界CO2传热特性的影响

    Fig. 6.  Effects of fluid temperature and flow direction on heat transfer of supercritical CO2 at high temperature region.

    图 7  z = 250 mm管截面平面上三种流动方向的流体 (a) 温度云图; (b) 径向速度矢量图; (c) 湍动能云图

    Fig. 7.  (a) Temperature contours, (b) radial velocity fields, (c) turbulence kinetic energy contours on the plane of z = 250 mm for three flow directions.

    图 8  系统压力在高温区对超临界CO2传热特性的影响

    Fig. 8.  Effect of pressure on heat transfer of supercritical CO2 at high temperature region.

    图 9  质量流率在高温区对超临界CO2传热特性的影响

    Fig. 9.  Effects of mass flux on heat transfer of supercritical CO2 at high temperature region.

    图 10  热流密度在高温区对超临界CO2传热特性的影响

    Fig. 10.  Effect of heat flux on heat transfer of supercritical CO2 at high temperature region.

    图 11  (a) 流动方向、(b) 系统压力、(c) 质量流率、(d) 热流密度在高温区对 (I) Bu和 (II) Ac的影响

    Fig. 11.  Effects of (a) flow direction, (b) pressure, (c) mass flux, (d) heat flux on (I) Bu and (II) Ac at high temperature region.

    图 12  BuAc的分布图

    Fig. 12.  Distributions of Bu and Ac

    图 13  传热关联式计算结果与模拟数据的对比

    Fig. 13.  Comparisons of the calculated heat transfer results by the correlations with the numerical results.

    表 1  网格无关性验证结果

    Table 1.  Verification for grid independence.

    算例网格数量Tw,o/KTw,o的相对偏差/%ho/(kW·m–2·K–1)ho的相对偏差/%
    126522501441.901236.70
    213322501442.20.021236.40.02
    38410001442.90.071235.00.14
    44622501445.10.221230.10.54
    51960001448.80.481223.31.09
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  传热关联式计算结果与模拟数据的对比

    Table 2.  Comparisons of the calculated heat transfer results by the correlations with the numerical results.

    作者关联式和工况条件MARD/%η/%
    基于热物性修正
    Bishop 等[23]$Nu = 0.0069Re_{\rm{b} }^{0.9}\overline {Pr} _{\rm{b} }^{0.66}{\left( { { { {\rho _{\rm{w} } } } }/{ { {\rho _{\rm{b} } } } } } \right)^{0.43} }\left[ {1 + 2.4({D}/{L}) } \right]$22.222.3
    工质: 水
    p = 22.6—27.5 MPa, G = 680—3600 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 310—3500 kW·m–2
    Krasnoshchekov和
    Protopopov[24]
    $Nu = 0.023Re_{\rm{b} }^{0.8}Pr_{\rm{b} }^{0.5}{\left( {{ { {\rho _{\rm{w} } } } }/{ { {\rho _{\rm{b} } } } } } \right)^{0.3} }{\left( {{ {\overline { {c_{\rm{p} } } } } }/{ { {c_{ {\rm{p,b} } } } } } } \right)^{0.4} }$8.1100
    工质: CO2
    p = 8—12 MPa, G = 2971 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 235—500 kW·m–2, Tin = 301.7—472 K
    流动方向: 水平
    Jackson[25]$Nu = 0.023Re_{\rm{b} }^{0.8}\overline {Pr} _{\rm{b} }^{0.5}{\left( { { { {\rho _{\rm{w} } } } }/{ { {\rho _{\rm{b} } } } } } \right)^{0.3} }$9.0100
    工质: CO2
    p = 7.8—9.8 MPa, Reb = 8×104—5×105, q ≤ 2600 kW·m–2
    基于无量纲数修正
    Liao和Zhao[26]垂直向上:18.160.7
    $Nu = 0.354Re_{\rm{b} }^{0.8}Pr_{\rm{b} }^{0.4}{\left( {{ { {\rho _{\rm{w} } } } }/{ { {\rho _{\rm{b} } } } } } \right)^{1.297} }{\left( {{ {\overline { {c_{\rm{p} } } } } }/{ { {c_{ {\rm{p,b} } } } } } } \right)^{0.296} }Bo_{\rm{m} }^{ {\rm{0} }{\rm{.157} } }$
    垂直向下:
    $Nu = 0.643Re_{\rm{b} }^{0.8}Pr_{\rm{b} }^{0.4}{\left( { { { {\rho _{\rm{w} } } } }/{ { {\rho _{\rm{b} } } } } } \right)^{2.154} }{\left( { { {\overline { {c_{\rm{p} } } } } }/{ { {c_{ {\rm{p,b} } } } } } } \right)^{0.751} }Bo_{\rm{m} }^{ {\rm{0} }{\rm{.186} } }$
    水平:
    $Nu = 0.124Re_{\rm{b} }^{0.8}Pr_{\rm{b} }^{0.4}{\left( {{ { {\rho _{\rm{w} } } } }/{ { {\rho _{\rm{b} } } } } } \right)^{0.842} }{\left( {{ {\overline { {c_{\rm{p} } } } } }/{ { {c_{ {\rm{p,b} } } } } } } \right)^{0.384} }Bo_{\rm{b} }^{ {\rm{0} }{\rm{.203} } },~ Bo = { {Gr} }/{ {Re_{\rm{b} }^{2.7} } }$
    工质: CO2
    p = 7.4—12 MPa, G = 236—1179 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 10—200 kW·m–2, Tin = 295—385 K
    Kim 等[10]$Nu = 0.226Re_{\rm{b}}^{1.174}Pr_{\rm{b}}^{1.057}{\left( {{{{\rho _{\rm{w}}}}}/{{{\rho _{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)^{0.571}}{\left( {{{\overline {{c_{\rm{p}}}} }}/{{{c_{{\rm{p,b}}}}}}} \right)^{1.032}}A{c^{0.489}}B{u^{0.0021}}$42.311.0
    $Ac = \dfrac{ { {q^ + } } }{ {Re_{\rm b}^{0.625} } }{\left( {\dfrac{ { {\rho _{\rm{b} } } }}{ { {\rho _{\rm{w} } } } } } \right)^{0.5} }\left( {\dfrac{ { {\mu _{\rm{w} } } }}{ { {\mu _{\rm{b} } } } } } \right), ~Bu = \dfrac{ {G{r_{\rm{q} } } }}{ {Re_{\rm{b} }^{3.425}Pr_{}^{0.8} } }{\left( {\dfrac{ { {\rho _{\rm{b} } } }}{ { {\rho _{\rm{w} } } } } } \right)^{0.5} }\left( {\dfrac{ { {\mu _{\rm{w} } } }}{ { {\mu _{\rm{b} } } } } } \right)$
    工质: CO2
    p = 7.46—10.29 MPa, G = 208—874 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 38—234 kW·m–2, Tin = 302—388 K
    流动方向: 垂直向上
    Bovard 等[11]$Nu = 0.040063Re_{\rm{b}}^{1.40418}Pr_{\rm{b}}^{0.97767359}{\left( {\dfrac{{{\rho _{\rm{w}}}}}{{{\rho _{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)^{0.573108}}{\left( {\dfrac{{\overline {{c_{\rm{p}}}} }}{{{c_{{\rm{p,b}}}}}}} \right)^{0.11577}}A{c^{0.396203}}B{u^{0.13746}}$82.80
    $Ac = \dfrac{{{q^ + }}}{{Re_b^{0.625}}}{\left( {\dfrac{{{\rho _{\rm{b}}}}}{{{\rho _{\rm{w}}}}}} \right)^{0.5}}\left( {\dfrac{{{\mu _{\rm{w}}}}}{{{\mu _{\rm{b}}}}}} \right),~ Bu = \dfrac{{G{r_{\rm{m}}}}}{{Re_{\rm{b}}^{3.425}Pr_{}^{0.8}}}{\left( {\dfrac{{{\rho _{\rm{b}}}}}{{{\rho _{\rm{w}}}}}} \right)^{0.5}}\left( {\dfrac{{{\mu _{\rm{w}}}}}{{{\mu _{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)$
    工质: CO2
    p = 6.5—8.335 MPa, G = 51—236 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 52—85 kW·m–2, Tin = 302 K
    流动方向: 垂直向上
    Liu 等[17]$Nu = 0.00075Re_{\rm{b}}^{0.93}\overline {Pr} _{\rm{b}}^{0.68}{\left( {\dfrac{{{\rho _{\rm{w}}}}}{{{\rho _{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)^{0.42}}\exp \left( {B{u^{ - 0.023}}} \right)\exp \left( {A{c^{0.079}}} \right)\left[ {1 + 2.63/\left( {L/D} \right)} \right]$28.73.5
    $Bu = \dfrac{{G{r_{\rm{m}}}}}{{Re_{\rm{b}}^{2.625}Pr_{\rm{w}}^{0.4}}}{\left( {\dfrac{{{\rho _{\rm{b}}}}}{{{\rho _{\rm{w}}}}}} \right)^{0.5}}\left( {\dfrac{{{\mu _{\rm{w}}}}}{{{\mu _{\rm{b}}}}}} \right),~ Ac = \dfrac{{4{q^ + }}}{{Re_b^{0.625}}}{\left( {\dfrac{{{\rho _{\rm{b}}}}}{{{\rho _{\rm{w}}}}}} \right)^{0.5}}\left( {\dfrac{{{\mu _{\rm{w}}}}}{{{\mu _{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)$
    工质: CO2
    p = 7.4—10.6 MPa, G = 298.8—1506.5 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 4.7—296 kW·m–2, Tin = 257—322 K
    流动方向: 垂直向上
    Zhang等[19]$Nu = \left\{ \begin{gathered} 0.00672Re_{\rm{b} }^{1.414}\overline {Pr} _{\rm{b} }^{ - 0.005}{\left( {\dfrac{ { {\rho _{\rm{w} } } } }{ { {\rho _{\rm{b} } } } } } \right)^{0.448} }{\left( {\dfrac{ {\overline { {c_{\rm{p} } } } } }{ { {c_{ {\rm{p,b} } } } } } } \right)^{0.218} }Bo_{\rm{m} }^{ {\rm{0} }{\rm{.586} } },\quad {H_{\rm{b} } } < 0.9{H_{ {\rm{pc} } } } \\ 0.056Re_{\rm{b} }^{0.829}\overline {Pr} _{\rm{b} }^{0.35}{\left( {\dfrac{ { {\rho _{\rm{w} } } } }{ { {\rho _{\rm{b} } } } } } \right)^{ - 0.095} }{\left( {\dfrac{ {\overline { {c_{\rm{p} } } } } }{ { {c_{ {\rm{p,b} } } } } } } \right)^{0.214} }Bo_{\rm{m} }^{ {\rm{0} }{\rm{.142} } }, \quad {H_{\rm{b} } } \geqslant 0.9{H_{ {\rm{pc} } } } \\\end{gathered} \right.$64.90
    工质: CO2
    p = 7.5—10.5 MPa, G = 50—500 kg·m–2·s–1, q = 5—100 kW·m–2, Tin = 266—313 K
    流动方向: 垂直向上
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Singh A S, Choudhary T, Sanjay S https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2019-01-1391/ [2020-9-20]

    [2]

    吴毅, 王佳莹, 王明坤, 戴义平 2016 西安交通大学学报 50 108Google Scholar

    Wu Y, Wang J Y, Wang M K, Dai Y P 2016 J. Xi'an Jiaotong Univ. 50 108Google Scholar

    [3]

    Turchi C S, Ma Z, Neises T W, Wagner M J 2013 J. Sol. Energy Eng. 135 041007Google Scholar

    [4]

    Neises T, Turchi C 2014 Energy Procedia 49 1187Google Scholar

    [5]

    黄凯欣, 饶政华, 廖胜明 2018 太阳能学报 39 44Google Scholar

    Huang X K, Rao Z H, Liao S M 2018 Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica 39 44Google Scholar

    [6]

    Benoit H, Spreafico L, Gauthier D, Flamant G 2016 Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 55 298Google Scholar

    [7]

    Mehos M, Turchi C, Vidal J, Wagner J, Ma Z, Ho C, Kolb W, Andraka C, Kruizenga A https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67464.pdf [2020-9-20]

    [8]

    Cabeza L F, de Gracia A, Fernández A I, Farid M M 2017 Appl. Therm. Eng. 125 799Google Scholar

    [9]

    Xie J, Liu D, Yan H, Xie G, Boetcher S K 2020 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 149 119233Google Scholar

    [10]

    Kim D E, Kim M H 2010 Nucl. Eng. Des. 240 3336Google Scholar

    [11]

    Bovard S, Abdi M, Nikou M R K, Daryasafar A 2017 J. Supercrit. Fluids 119 88Google Scholar

    [12]

    Qiu Y, Li M J, He Y L, Tao W Q 2016 Appl. Therm. Eng. 115 1255Google Scholar

    [13]

    刘占斌, 何雅玲, 王坤, 马朝, 姜涛 2019 化工学报 70 3329Google Scholar

    Liu Z B, He Y L, Wang K, Ma Z, Jiang T 2019 J. Chem. Ind. Eng. (China) 70 3329Google Scholar

    [14]

    Lemmon E W, Huber M L, McLinden M O http://www.nist.gov/srd/nist23.cfm [2020-9-20]

    [15]

    Launder B E, Spalding D B 1972 Mathematical Models of Turbulence (London: Academic Press) p169

    [16]

    Kim D E, Kim M H 2011 Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 32 176Google Scholar

    [17]

    Liu S, Huang Y, Liu G, Wang J, Leung L K 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 106 1144Google Scholar

    [18]

    Hall W B, Jackson J D 1969 Mech. Eng. 91 66

    [19]

    Zhang Q, Li H, Kong X, Liu J, Lei X 2018 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 122 469Google Scholar

    [20]

    Lei Y, Chen Z 2018 Int. J. Refrig. 90 46Google Scholar

    [21]

    Xiang M, Guo J, Huai X, Cui X 2017 J. Supercrit. Fluids 130 389Google Scholar

    [22]

    Xu R N, Luo F, Jiang P X 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 110 576Google Scholar

    [23]

    Bishop A A, Sandberg R O, Tong L S 1965 Report WCAP-2056 (Pittsburgh: Westinghouse Electric Corporation) p85

    [24]

    Kranoshchekov E A, Protopopov V S 1966 High Temp. 4 375

    [25]

    Jackson J D 2013 Nucl. Eng. Des. 264 24Google Scholar

    [26]

    Liao S M, Zhao T S 2002 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 45 5025Google Scholar

  • [1] 解奕晨, 庄晓如, 岳思君, 李翔, 余鹏, 鲁春. HFE-7100平行微通道流动沸腾实验. 物理学报, 2024, 73(5): 054401. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231415
    [2] 刘曰利, 赵思杰, 陈文, 周静. SiO2/聚四氟乙烯复合介质材料热性能和介电性能的数值模拟. 物理学报, 2022, 71(21): 210201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220839
    [3] 张海松, 徐进良, 朱鑫杰. 基于拟沸腾理论的超临界CO2管内传热恶化量纲分析. 物理学报, 2021, 70(4): 044401. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201546
    [4] 王存海, 郑树, 张欣欣. 非规则形状介质内辐射-导热耦合传热的间断有限元求解. 物理学报, 2020, 69(3): 034401. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191185
    [5] 张翱, 张春秀, 陈云琳, 张春梅, 孟涛. 反式卤素钙钛矿太阳能电池光伏性能的理论研究. 物理学报, 2020, 69(11): 118801. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200089
    [6] 李俊炜, 王祖军, 石成英, 薛院院, 宁浩, 徐瑞, 焦仟丽, 贾同轩. GaInP/GaAs/Ge三结太阳电池不同能量质子辐照损伤模拟. 物理学报, 2020, 69(9): 098802. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191878
    [7] 闫晨帅, 徐进良. 超临界压力CO2在水平圆管内流动传热数值分析. 物理学报, 2020, 69(4): 044401. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191513
    [8] 王新鑫, 迟露鑫, 伍光凤, 李春天, 樊丁. Ar-O2混合气体电弧的数值模拟. 物理学报, 2019, 68(17): 178102. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190416
    [9] 胡海豹, 何强, 余思潇, 张招柱, 宋东. 低温光滑壁面上水滴撞击结冰行为. 物理学报, 2016, 65(10): 104703. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.104703
    [10] 温家乐, 徐志成, 古宇, 郑冬琴, 钟伟荣. 异质结碳纳米管的热整流效率. 物理学报, 2015, 64(21): 216501. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.216501
    [11] 王小虎, 易仕和, 付佳, 陆小革, 何霖. 二维高超声速后台阶表面传热特性实验研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(5): 054706. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.054706
    [12] 李大树, 仇性启, 郑志伟. 液滴碰撞液膜润湿壁面空气夹带数值分析. 物理学报, 2015, 64(22): 224704. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.224704
    [13] 徐肖肖, 吴杨杨, 刘朝, 王开正, 叶建. 水平螺旋管内超临界CO2冷却换热的数值模拟. 物理学报, 2015, 64(5): 054401. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.054401
    [14] 郭亚丽, 魏兰, 沈胜强, 陈桂影. 双液滴撞击平面液膜的流动与传热特性. 物理学报, 2014, 63(9): 094702. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.094702
    [15] 蒋勇, 贺少勃, 袁晓东, 王海军, 廖威, 吕海兵, 刘春明, 向霞, 邱荣, 杨永佳, 郑万国, 祖小涛. CO2激光光栅式扫描修复熔石英表面缺陷的实验研究与数值模拟. 物理学报, 2014, 63(6): 068105. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.068105
    [16] 李日, 王健, 周黎明, 潘红. 基于体积平均法模拟铸锭凝固过程的可靠性分析. 物理学报, 2014, 63(12): 128103. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.128103
    [17] 李哲, 江海河, 王礼, 杨经纬, 吴先友. 2 m Cr,Tm,Ho:YAG激光热退偏效应的数值模拟及实验研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(4): 044205. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.044205
    [18] 杨平, 吴勇胜, 许海锋, 许鲜欣, 张立强, 李培. TiO2/ZnO纳米薄膜界面热导率的分子动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2011, 60(6): 066601. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.066601
    [19] 肖波齐, 陈玲霞, 蒋国平, 饶连周, 王宗篪, 魏茂金. 池沸腾传热的数学分析. 物理学报, 2009, 58(4): 2523-2527. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2523
    [20] 王可胜, 刘全坤, 张德元. D2钢系列涂层磨损性能的数值模拟. 物理学报, 2009, 58(13): 89-S93. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.89
计量
  • 文章访问数:  5662
  • PDF下载量:  136
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-06-28
  • 修回日期:  2020-09-09
  • 上网日期:  2021-01-20
  • 刊出日期:  2021-02-05

/

返回文章
返回