超快强场相干调控氯溴甲烷分子的解离研究

景文泉; 贾利娟; 孙兆鹏; 赵松峰; 束传存

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20241401

摘要

超快强场相干调控分子解离在原子与分子物理、物理化学、量子调控等多个领域引起了重要关注, 在现象理解、机理探究和调控方案等多个方面仍然存在许多值得深入研究的问题. 近期研究表明, 在保持光谱振幅分布不变的条件下, 对最初处于基电子态纯本征态的分子, 通过调制单个超快强紫外激光脉冲的光谱相位分布, 可以有效调控总解离概率和分支比. 本文采用含时量子波包方法, 进一步探讨了光谱相位调控氯溴甲烷(CH₂BrCl)分子的光解离反应, 着重探究了初始振动态对解离反应的影响. 为了凸显超快强场脉冲调控解离机理与弱场的不同, 本文展示了在弱场极限下, 改变单个超快脉冲的谱相位不会影响总解离概率和分支比; 然而在强场极限下, 总解离概率和分支比对单个超快脉冲的谱相位有明显依赖性. 通过分析基电子态振动态布居分布, 发现啁啾脉冲可以有效调控强场极限下诱导的共振拉曼散射(resonance Raman scattering, RRS)现象, 从而导致解离概率和分支比对初始振动态的选择性. 研究结果进一步表明, 通过选择合适的初始振动态并调控啁啾率的值和符号, 可以实现Cl+CH₂Br键的优先断裂. 该研究为理解超快光场相干控制多原子分子光解反应提供了新的视角.

关键词:

Abstract

Coherent control of molecular dissociation in ultrafast strong fields has received considerable attention in various scientific disciplines, such as atomic and molecular physics, physical chemistry, and quantum control. Many fundamental issues still exist regarding the understanding of phenomena, exploration of mechanisms, and development of control strategies. Recent progress has shown that manipulating the spectral phase distribution of a single ultrafast strong ultraviolet laser pulse while maintaining the same spectral amplitude distribution can effectively control the total dissociation probability and branching ratio of molecules initially in the ground state. In this work, the spectral phase control of the photodissociation reaction of chlorobromomethane (CH₂BrCl) is studied in depth by using a time-dependent quantum wave packet method, focusing on the influence of the initial vibrational state on the dissociation reaction. The results show that modifying the spectral phase of a single ultrafast pulse does not influence the total dissociation probability or branching ratio in the weak field limit. However, these factors exhibit significant dependence on the spectral phase of the single ultrafast pulse in the strong field limit. By analyzing the population distribution of vibrational states in the ground electronic state, we observe that chirped pulses can effectively control the resonance Raman scattering (RRS) phenomenon induced in strong fields, thereby selectively affecting the dissociation probability and branching ratio based on initial vibrational states. Furthermore, we demonstrate that by selecting an appropriate initial vibration state and controlling both the value and sign of the chirp rate, it is possible to achieve preferential cleavage of Cl+CH₂Br bonds. This study provides new insights into understanding of ultrafast coherent control of photodissociation reactions in polyatomic molecules.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
中南大学物理学院, 湖南省超微结构与超快过程重点实验室, 长沙　410083

2.
西北师范大学物理与电子工程学院, 甘肃省原子分子物理与功能材料重点实验室, 兰州　730070

3.
鲁东大学物理与光电工程学院, 理论物理研究所, 烟台　264025

通信作者: 赵松峰, zhaosf@nwnu.edu.cn ; 束传存, cc.shu@csu.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2022YFA1604204)、国家自然科学基金(批准号: 12164044, 12274470, 61973317)和湖南省杰出青年自然科学基金(批准号: 2022JJ10070)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
Hunan Key Laboratory of Super Microstructure and Ultrafast Process, School of Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

2.
Key Laboratory of Atomic and Molecular Physics and Functional Materials of Gansu Province, College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China

3.
Institute of Theoretical Physics, School of Physics and Optoelectric Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China

Corresponding author: Zhao Song-Feng, zhaosf@nwnu.edu.cn ; Shu Chuan-Cun, cc.shu@csu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFA1604204), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12164044, 12274470, 61973317), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province for Distinguished Young Scholars, China (Grant No. 2022JJ10070).

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Mokhtari A, Cong P, Herek J, Zewail A 1990 Nature 348 225 Google Scholar
[2]	Brumer P, Shapiro M 1992 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 43 257 Google Scholar
[3]	King W E, Campbell G H, Frank A, Reed B, Schmerge J F, Siwick B J, Stuart B C, Weber P M 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 111101 Google Scholar
[4]	Sun Z, Wang C, Zhao W, Yang C 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 149 224307 Google Scholar
[5]	Yang J, Zhu X, Wolf T J, Li Z, Nunes J P F, Coffee R, Cryan J P, Gühr M, Hegazy K, Heinz T F, Jobe K, Li R, Shen X, Veccione T, Weathersby S, Wilkin K J, Yoneda C, Zheng Q, Martinez T J, Centurion M, Wang X 2018 Science 361 64 Google Scholar
[6]	Sun Z, Liu Y 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 17397 Google Scholar
[7]	Rubio-Lago L, Chicharro D V, Poullain S M, Zanchet A, Koumarianou G, Glodic P, Samartzis P C, García-Vela A, Bañares L 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 11684 Google Scholar
[8]	Kranabetter L, Kristensen H H, Ghazaryan A, Schouder C A, Chatterley A S, Janssen P, Jensen F, Zillich R E, Lemeshko M, Stapelfeldt H 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 053201 Google Scholar
[9]	Lian Z, Hu Z, Qi H, Fei D, Luo S, Chen Z, Shu C C 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 053105 Google Scholar
[10]	Xu S, Lian Z, Hong Q Q, Wang L, Chen H, Huang Y, Shu C C 2024 Phys. Rev. A 110 023116 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhang H, Lavorel B, Billard F, Hartmann J M, Hertz E, Faucher O, Ma J, Wu J, Gershnabel E, Prior Y, Averbukh I S 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 193401 Google Scholar
[12]	Hong Q Q, Fan L B, Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 013108 Google Scholar
[13]	Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 013408 Google Scholar
[14]	Hong Q Q, Lian Z Z, Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 32763 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhang W, Gong X, Li H, Lu P, Sun F, Ji Q, Lin K, Ma J, Li H, Qiang J, He F, Wu J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 757 Google Scholar
[16]	Lu P, Wang J, Li H, Lin K, Gong X, Song Q, Ji Q, Zhang W, Ma J, Li H, Zeng H, He F, Wu J 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115 2049 Google Scholar
[17]	Guo Z, Fang Y, Ge P, Yu X, Wang J, Han M, Gong Q, Liu Y 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 L051101 Google Scholar
[18]	Yu X, Zhang X, Hu X, Zhao X, Ren D, Li X, Ma P, Wang C, Wu Y, Luo S, Ding D 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 023001 Google Scholar
[19]	Sansone G, Kelkensberg F, Pérez-Torres J, Morales F, Kling M F, Siu W, Ghafur O, Johnsson P, Swoboda M, Benedetti E, Ferrari F, Lépine F, Sanz-Vicario L J, Zherebtsov S, Znakovskaya I, L’Huillier A, Ivanov Y M, Nisoli M, Martín F, Vrakking M J J 2010 Nature 465 763 Google Scholar
[20]	Kang H, Quan W, Wang Y, Lin Z, Wu M, Liu H, Liu X, Wang B B, Liu H J, Gu Y Q, Jia X Y, Liu J, Chen J, Cheng Y 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 203001 Google Scholar
[21]	罗嗣佐, 陈洲, 李孝开, 胡湛, 丁大军 2019 光学学报 39 0126007 Google Scholar Luo S Z, Chen Z, Li X K, Hu Z, Ding D J 2019 Acta Opt. Sin. 39 0126007 Google Scholar
[22]	Li X, Liu Y, Zhang D, He L, Luo S, Shu C C, Ding D 2023 Phys. Rev. A 108 023114 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang W, Yu Z, Gong X, Wang J, Lu P, Li H, Song Q, Ji Q, Lin K, Ma J, Li H, Sun F, Qiang J, Zeng H, He F, Wu J 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 253202 Google Scholar
[24]	Guo Z, Zhang Z, Deng Y, Wang J, Ye D, Liu J, Liu Y 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 143201 Google Scholar
[25]	McFarland B K, Farrell J P, Bucksbaum P H, Guhr M 2008 Science 322 1232 Google Scholar
[26]	Chen Y J, Fu L B, Liu J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 073902 Google Scholar
[27]	Huang Y, Meng C, Wang X, Lü Z, Zhang D, Chen W, Zhao J, Yuan J, Zhao Z 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 123002 Google Scholar
[28]	Yang W, Sheng Z, Feng X, Wu M, Chen Z, Song X 2014 Opt. Express 22 2519 Google Scholar
[29]	He M, Li Y, Zhou Y, Li M, Cao W, Lu P 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 133204 Google Scholar
[30]	Xie W, Yan J, Li M, Cao C, Guo K, Zhou Y, Lu P 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 263202 Google Scholar
[31]	Zewail A H 2000 J. Phys. Chem. A 104 5660 Google Scholar
[32]	Kobayashi Y, Chang K F, Zeng T, Neumark D M, Leone S R 2019 Science 365 79 Google Scholar
[33]	Shu C C, Yuan K J, Dong D, Petersen I R, Bandrauk A D 2017 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8 1 Google Scholar
[34]	Yang D, Cong S L 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 013424 Google Scholar
[35]	Jia Y W, Yuen C, Jing W Q, Zhou Z Y, Lin C, Zhao S F 2024 Phys. Rev. A 110 023112 Google Scholar
[36]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2001 J. Phys. Chem. A 105 2897 Google Scholar
[37]	Csehi A, Halász G J, Cederbaum L S, Vibók Á 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 143 014305 Google Scholar
[38]	Liebel M, Kukura P 2017 Nat. Chem. 9 45 Google Scholar
[39]	Wilma K, Shu C C, Scherf U, Hildner R 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 15329 Google Scholar
[40]	Morichika I, Murata K, Sakurai A, Ishii K, Ashihara S 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 3893 Google Scholar
[41]	Csehi A, Halász G J, Cederbaum L S, Vibók Á 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 074309 Google Scholar
[42]	Tiwari A K, Henriksen N E 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 014306 Google Scholar
[43]	Sun Z, Wang C, Zhao W, Zheng Y, Yang C 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 20957 Google Scholar
[44]	Spanner M, Arango C A, Brumer P 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 133 151101 Google Scholar
[45]	Weigel A, Sebesta A, Kukura P 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 4032 Google Scholar
[46]	Brumer P, Shapiro M 1986 Chem. Phys. Lett. 126 541 Google Scholar
[47]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2003 Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (New York: Wiley
[48]	Garcia-Vela A, Henriksen N E 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 824 Google Scholar
[49]	García-Vela A 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 10346 Google Scholar
[50]	Serrano-Jiménez A, Bañares L, García-Vela A 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 7885 Google Scholar
[51]	Dey D, Henriksen N E 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11 8470 Google Scholar
[52]	Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 164308 Google Scholar
[53]	Tiwari A K, Dey D, Henriksen N E 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 023417 Google Scholar
[54]	Liu Y, Meng J Q, Sun Z, Shu C C 2024 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15 8393 Google Scholar
[55]	García-Vela A 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 153204 Google Scholar
[56]	Abrashkevich D G, Shapiro M, Brumer P 2002 J. Chem. Phys. 116 5584 Google Scholar
[57]	Nichols S R, Weinacht T C, Rozgonyi T, Pearson B J 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 043407 Google Scholar
[58]	Luo S, Zhou S, Hu W, Li X, Ma P, Yu J, Zhu R, Wang C, Liu F, Yan B, Liu A, Yang Y, Guo F, Dajun D 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 063415 Google Scholar
[59]	Esposito V J, Liu T, Wang G, Caracciolo A, Vansco M F, Marchetti B, Karsili T N, Lester M I 2021 J. Phys. Chem. A 125 6571 Google Scholar
[60]	Jing W Q, Sun Z P, Zhao S F, Shu C C 2023 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14 11305 Google Scholar
[61]	Sarma M, Adhikari S, Mishra M K 2008 J. Phys. Chem. A 112 13302 Google Scholar
[62]	Geißler D, Marquetand P, González-Vázquez J, González L, Rozgonyi T, Weinacht T 2012 J. Phys. Chem. A 116 11434 Google Scholar
[63]	Corrales M E, de Nalda R, Bañares L 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1345 Google Scholar
[64]	Bouallagui A, Zanchet A, Bañares L, García-Vela A 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 20365 Google Scholar
[65]	Rozgonyi T, González L 2008 J. Phys. Chem. A 112 5573 Google Scholar
[66]	Shu C C, Rozgonyi T, González L, Henriksen N E 2012 J. Chem. Phys. 136 174303 Google Scholar
[67]	Chicharro D, Marggi Poullain S, González-Vázquez J, Bañares L 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 013945 Google Scholar
[68]	Muthiah B, Kasai T, Lin K C 2021 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23 6098 Google Scholar
[69]	Lanczos C 1950 J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand 45 255 Google Scholar
[70]	Park T J, Light J 1986 J. Chem. Phys. 85 5870 Google Scholar
[71]	Sun Z, Yang C, Zheng Y 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 143 224309 Google Scholar
[72]	Kosloff R 1988 J. Phys. Chem. 92 2087 Google Scholar
[73]	Simpson J R, Roslyak O, Duque J G, Hároz E H, Crochet J J, Telg H, Piryatinski A, Walker A R H, Doorn S K 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 637 Google Scholar
[74]	Guo Y, Shu C C, Dong D, Nori F 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 223202 Google Scholar
[75]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2012 Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (New York: John Wiley & Sons) pp95–152

施引文献

图 1 $ \rm {CH_{2}BrCl} $光解离激光控制示意图　(a)基电子态$ \text{S}_0(\text{a}^{1}\text{A}') $、激发态$ \text{S}_1(\text{a}^{1}\text{A}') $和$ \text{S}_2(\text{a}^{1}\text{A}') $的光解离动力学模型; (b)不同初始振动态$ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $沿着Br—CH₂反应坐标描绘的光解离通道; (c)不同初始振动态$ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $沿Cl—CH₂反应坐标的光解离通道. 其中黑色线、红色线和蓝色线分别表示基电子态$ \text{S}_0(V_0^\text{ad}) $、第一激发电子态$ \text{S}_1(V_1^\text{ad}) $和第二激发电子态$ \text{S}_2(V_2^\text{ad}) $的绝热势能曲线, 红色虚线和黑色虚线分别表示非绝热势能曲线$ V_1^{{\mathrm{di}}} $和$ V_2^{{\mathrm{di}}} $

Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of laser control in the photodissociation process of $ \rm {CH_{2}BrCl} $. (a) The model showcasing the photodissociation dynamics involving the ground electronic state $ \text{S}_0(\text{a}^{1}\text{A}') $, as well as the excited adiabatic electronic states $ \text{S}_1(\text{b}^{1}\text{A}') $ and $ \text{S}_2(\text{c}^{1}\text{A}') $. (b) Photodissociation channel along the Br—CH₂ reaction coordinate for different initial vibrational states $ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $. (c) The channel along the Cl—CH₂ reaction coordinate for the same initial states $ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $. The black, red, and blue solid lines represent the adiabatic potential energy curves of ground electronic state $ \text{S}_0(V_0^\text{ad}) $, the first excited electronic state $ \text{S}_1(V_1^\text{ad}) $, and the second excited electronic state $ \text{S}_2(V_2^\text{ad}) $, respectively. Notably, the red-dashed line and the black-dashed line represent the non-adiabatic potential $ V_1^{\mathrm{di}} $ and $ V_2^{\text{di}} $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 CH₂BrCl分子初始振动态为$ |00\rangle $, $ |10\rangle $和$ |20\rangle $时, (a)—(c)基电子态的二维振动本征函数密度分布; (d)—(f)弱场极限下Br+CH₂Cl通道和Cl+CH₂Br通道的含时解离概率(分别用$ P^{\mathrm{Br}} $和$ P^{\mathrm{Cl}} $标记), (g)—(i)相应的含时分支比R; (j)—(l) 强场极限下Br+CH₂Cl和Cl+CH₂Br两个通道的含时解离概率, (m)—(o)相应的含时解离分支比

Fig. 2. For the initial vibrational states of $ |00\rangle $, $ |01\rangle $ and $ |02\rangle $, (a)–(c) two-dimensional vibrational eigenfunction density distributions; (d)–(f) the dissociation probabilities of Br+CH₂Cl and Cl+CH₂Br channels in the weak-field limit (marked with $ P^{\mathrm{Br}} $ and $ P^{\mathrm{Cl}} $, respectively), and (g)–(i) the corresponding time-dependent dissociation branching ratios R; (j)–(l) and (m)–(o) as well as in the strong-field limit.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 CH₂BrCl分子初始振动态为$ |01\rangle $, $ |02\rangle $和$ |11\rangle $时, (a)—(c)基电子态的二维振动本征函数密度分布; (d)—(f)弱场极限下Br+CH₂Cl通道和Cl+CH₂Br通道的含时解离概率(分别用$ P^{\mathrm{Br}} $和$ P^{\mathrm{Cl}} $标记), (g)—(i)相应的含时分支比R; (j)—(l)强场极限下Br+CH₂Cl和Cl+CH₂Br两个通道的含时解离概率, (m)—(o)相应的含时解离分支比

Fig. 3. For the initial vibrational states of $ |00\rangle $, $ |01\rangle $ and $ |02\rangle $, (a)–(c) two-dimensional vibrational eigenfunction density distributions; (d)–(f) the dissociation probabilities of Br+CH₂Cl and Cl+CH₂Br channels in the weak-field limit (marked with $ P^{\mathrm{Br}} $ and $ P^{\mathrm{Cl}} $, respectively), and (g)–(i) the corresponding time-dependent dissociation branching ratios R; (j)–(l) and (m)–(o) as well as in the strong-field limit.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 弱场极限下CH₂BrCl分子总解离概率(a)—(f)和分支比(g)—(l)作为啁啾率$ \beta_{0} $和不同初始振动态$ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $的函数

Fig. 4. Dependence of (a)−(f) total dissociation probability and (g)−(l) branching ratio of CH₂BrCl on the chirp rate $ \beta_{0} $ and different initial state $ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $ in the weak-field limit.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 强场极限下, CH₂BrCl分子总解离概率(a)—(f)和分支比(g)—(l)作为啁啾率$ \beta_{0} $和不同初始振动态$ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $的函数

Fig. 5. (a)–(f) Total dissociation probability and (g)–(l) branching ratio in CH₂BrCl as a function of chirp rate $ \beta_{0} $ and different initial state $ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $ in the strong-field limit.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 (a) $ |00\rangle $, (b) $ |10\rangle $, (c) $ |20\rangle $, (d) $ |01\rangle $, (e) $ |02\rangle $, (f) $ |11\rangle $分别作为初始振动态时, 基电子态其余振动态末态布居之和$ P(t_{\mathrm{f}}) $随啁啾率$ \beta_{0} $的变化行为. 对于所有不同的初始振动态, $ P(t_{\mathrm{f}}) $的最大值都出现在$ \beta_0=0 $附近

Fig. 6. (a)–(f) Sum of the remaining vibrational states populations $ P(t_{\mathrm{f}}) $ of the ground electronic state for the initial vibrational state (a) $ |00\rangle $, (b) $ |10\rangle $, (c) $ |20\rangle $, (d) $ |01\rangle $, (e) $ |02\rangle $ and (f) $ |11\rangle $ as a function of $ \beta_0 $, respectively. The maximum of $ P(t_{\mathrm{f}}) $ appears near $ \beta_0=0 $ for all different initial vibrational states.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 随着啁啾率$ \beta_{0} $的改变, (a) $ |00\rangle $, (b) $ |10\rangle $, (c) $ |20\rangle $, (d) $ |01\rangle $, (e) $ |02\rangle $, (f) $ |11\rangle $分别作为初始振动态时, 基电子态不同振动态$ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $的末态布居分布

Fig. 7. Final population distributions of different vibrational states $ |\nu'\nu''\rangle $ for the different initial vibrational state (a) $ |00\rangle $, (b) $ |10\rangle $, (c) $ |20\rangle $, (d) $ |01\rangle $, (e) $ |02\rangle $ and (f) $ |11\rangle $, varying with the chirp rate $ \beta_0 $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 强场极限下啁啾脉冲诱导的基电子态振动态共振拉曼散射现象. 初始振动态为$ |00\rangle $, $ |10\rangle $和$ |20\rangle $时, (a)—(i)啁啾率$ \beta_0=0 $, $ \pm30 $ fs²时的初态含时布居$ P_{\nu'\nu''} $、基电子态其余振动态布居之和$ P(t) $、两个激发电子态的含时布居$ P_{1} $和$ P_{2} $

Fig. 8. Resonance Raman scattering phenomenon of the vibrational states of the ground electronic state induced by a chirped pulse in the strong-field limit. For the initial vibrational states of $ |00\rangle $, $ |10\rangle $ and $ |20\rangle $, (a)–(i) the time-dependent populations of the initial state $ P_{\nu'\nu''} $, the total of remaining vibrational states of the ground electronic state $ P(t) $, and the two excited electronic states $ P_{1} $ and $ P_{2} $ with three different chirp rates $ \beta_0=0 $, $ \pm30 $ fs².

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 强场极限下啁啾脉冲诱导的基电子态振动态共振拉曼散射现象. 初始振动态为$ |01\rangle $, $ |02\rangle $和$ |11\rangle $时, (a)—(i)啁啾率$ \beta_0=0 $, $ \pm30 $ fs²时的初态含时布居$ P_{\nu'\nu''} $、基电子态其余振动态布居之和$ P(t) $、两个激发电子态的含时布居$ P_{1} $和$ P_{2} $

Fig. 9. Resonance Raman scattering phenomenon of the vibrational states of the ground electronic state induced by a chirped pulse in the strong-field limit. For the initial vibrational states of $ |01\rangle $, $ |02\rangle $ and $ |11\rangle $, (a)–(i) the time-dependent populations of the initial state $ P_{\nu'\nu''} $, the total of the remaining vibrational states of the ground electronic state $ P(t) $, and the two excited electronic states $ P_{1} $ and $ P_{2} $ with three different chirp rates $ \beta_0=0 $, $ \pm30 $ fs².

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

[1]	Mokhtari A, Cong P, Herek J, Zewail A 1990 Nature 348 225 Google Scholar
[2]	Brumer P, Shapiro M 1992 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 43 257 Google Scholar
[3]	King W E, Campbell G H, Frank A, Reed B, Schmerge J F, Siwick B J, Stuart B C, Weber P M 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 111101 Google Scholar
[4]	Sun Z, Wang C, Zhao W, Yang C 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 149 224307 Google Scholar
[5]	Yang J, Zhu X, Wolf T J, Li Z, Nunes J P F, Coffee R, Cryan J P, Gühr M, Hegazy K, Heinz T F, Jobe K, Li R, Shen X, Veccione T, Weathersby S, Wilkin K J, Yoneda C, Zheng Q, Martinez T J, Centurion M, Wang X 2018 Science 361 64 Google Scholar
[6]	Sun Z, Liu Y 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 17397 Google Scholar
[7]	Rubio-Lago L, Chicharro D V, Poullain S M, Zanchet A, Koumarianou G, Glodic P, Samartzis P C, García-Vela A, Bañares L 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 11684 Google Scholar
[8]	Kranabetter L, Kristensen H H, Ghazaryan A, Schouder C A, Chatterley A S, Janssen P, Jensen F, Zillich R E, Lemeshko M, Stapelfeldt H 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 053201 Google Scholar
[9]	Lian Z, Hu Z, Qi H, Fei D, Luo S, Chen Z, Shu C C 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 053105 Google Scholar
[10]	Xu S, Lian Z, Hong Q Q, Wang L, Chen H, Huang Y, Shu C C 2024 Phys. Rev. A 110 023116 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhang H, Lavorel B, Billard F, Hartmann J M, Hertz E, Faucher O, Ma J, Wu J, Gershnabel E, Prior Y, Averbukh I S 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 193401 Google Scholar
[12]	Hong Q Q, Fan L B, Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 013108 Google Scholar
[13]	Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 013408 Google Scholar
[14]	Hong Q Q, Lian Z Z, Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 32763 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhang W, Gong X, Li H, Lu P, Sun F, Ji Q, Lin K, Ma J, Li H, Qiang J, He F, Wu J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 757 Google Scholar
[16]	Lu P, Wang J, Li H, Lin K, Gong X, Song Q, Ji Q, Zhang W, Ma J, Li H, Zeng H, He F, Wu J 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115 2049 Google Scholar
[17]	Guo Z, Fang Y, Ge P, Yu X, Wang J, Han M, Gong Q, Liu Y 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 L051101 Google Scholar
[18]	Yu X, Zhang X, Hu X, Zhao X, Ren D, Li X, Ma P, Wang C, Wu Y, Luo S, Ding D 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 023001 Google Scholar
[19]	Sansone G, Kelkensberg F, Pérez-Torres J, Morales F, Kling M F, Siu W, Ghafur O, Johnsson P, Swoboda M, Benedetti E, Ferrari F, Lépine F, Sanz-Vicario L J, Zherebtsov S, Znakovskaya I, L’Huillier A, Ivanov Y M, Nisoli M, Martín F, Vrakking M J J 2010 Nature 465 763 Google Scholar
[20]	Kang H, Quan W, Wang Y, Lin Z, Wu M, Liu H, Liu X, Wang B B, Liu H J, Gu Y Q, Jia X Y, Liu J, Chen J, Cheng Y 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 203001 Google Scholar
[21]	罗嗣佐, 陈洲, 李孝开, 胡湛, 丁大军 2019 光学学报 39 0126007 Google Scholar Luo S Z, Chen Z, Li X K, Hu Z, Ding D J 2019 Acta Opt. Sin. 39 0126007 Google Scholar
[22]	Li X, Liu Y, Zhang D, He L, Luo S, Shu C C, Ding D 2023 Phys. Rev. A 108 023114 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang W, Yu Z, Gong X, Wang J, Lu P, Li H, Song Q, Ji Q, Lin K, Ma J, Li H, Sun F, Qiang J, Zeng H, He F, Wu J 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 253202 Google Scholar
[24]	Guo Z, Zhang Z, Deng Y, Wang J, Ye D, Liu J, Liu Y 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 143201 Google Scholar
[25]	McFarland B K, Farrell J P, Bucksbaum P H, Guhr M 2008 Science 322 1232 Google Scholar
[26]	Chen Y J, Fu L B, Liu J 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 073902 Google Scholar
[27]	Huang Y, Meng C, Wang X, Lü Z, Zhang D, Chen W, Zhao J, Yuan J, Zhao Z 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 123002 Google Scholar
[28]	Yang W, Sheng Z, Feng X, Wu M, Chen Z, Song X 2014 Opt. Express 22 2519 Google Scholar
[29]	He M, Li Y, Zhou Y, Li M, Cao W, Lu P 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 133204 Google Scholar
[30]	Xie W, Yan J, Li M, Cao C, Guo K, Zhou Y, Lu P 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 263202 Google Scholar
[31]	Zewail A H 2000 J. Phys. Chem. A 104 5660 Google Scholar
[32]	Kobayashi Y, Chang K F, Zeng T, Neumark D M, Leone S R 2019 Science 365 79 Google Scholar
[33]	Shu C C, Yuan K J, Dong D, Petersen I R, Bandrauk A D 2017 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8 1 Google Scholar
[34]	Yang D, Cong S L 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 013424 Google Scholar
[35]	Jia Y W, Yuen C, Jing W Q, Zhou Z Y, Lin C, Zhao S F 2024 Phys. Rev. A 110 023112 Google Scholar
[36]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2001 J. Phys. Chem. A 105 2897 Google Scholar
[37]	Csehi A, Halász G J, Cederbaum L S, Vibók Á 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 143 014305 Google Scholar
[38]	Liebel M, Kukura P 2017 Nat. Chem. 9 45 Google Scholar
[39]	Wilma K, Shu C C, Scherf U, Hildner R 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 15329 Google Scholar
[40]	Morichika I, Murata K, Sakurai A, Ishii K, Ashihara S 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 3893 Google Scholar
[41]	Csehi A, Halász G J, Cederbaum L S, Vibók Á 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 074309 Google Scholar
[42]	Tiwari A K, Henriksen N E 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 014306 Google Scholar
[43]	Sun Z, Wang C, Zhao W, Zheng Y, Yang C 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 20957 Google Scholar
[44]	Spanner M, Arango C A, Brumer P 2010 J. Chem. Phys. 133 151101 Google Scholar
[45]	Weigel A, Sebesta A, Kukura P 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 4032 Google Scholar
[46]	Brumer P, Shapiro M 1986 Chem. Phys. Lett. 126 541 Google Scholar
[47]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2003 Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (New York: Wiley
[48]	Garcia-Vela A, Henriksen N E 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 824 Google Scholar
[49]	García-Vela A 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 10346 Google Scholar
[50]	Serrano-Jiménez A, Bañares L, García-Vela A 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 7885 Google Scholar
[51]	Dey D, Henriksen N E 2020 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11 8470 Google Scholar
[52]	Shu C C, Henriksen N E 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 164308 Google Scholar
[53]	Tiwari A K, Dey D, Henriksen N E 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 023417 Google Scholar
[54]	Liu Y, Meng J Q, Sun Z, Shu C C 2024 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15 8393 Google Scholar
[55]	García-Vela A 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 153204 Google Scholar
[56]	Abrashkevich D G, Shapiro M, Brumer P 2002 J. Chem. Phys. 116 5584 Google Scholar
[57]	Nichols S R, Weinacht T C, Rozgonyi T, Pearson B J 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 043407 Google Scholar
[58]	Luo S, Zhou S, Hu W, Li X, Ma P, Yu J, Zhu R, Wang C, Liu F, Yan B, Liu A, Yang Y, Guo F, Dajun D 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 063415 Google Scholar
[59]	Esposito V J, Liu T, Wang G, Caracciolo A, Vansco M F, Marchetti B, Karsili T N, Lester M I 2021 J. Phys. Chem. A 125 6571 Google Scholar
[60]	Jing W Q, Sun Z P, Zhao S F, Shu C C 2023 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14 11305 Google Scholar
[61]	Sarma M, Adhikari S, Mishra M K 2008 J. Phys. Chem. A 112 13302 Google Scholar
[62]	Geißler D, Marquetand P, González-Vázquez J, González L, Rozgonyi T, Weinacht T 2012 J. Phys. Chem. A 116 11434 Google Scholar
[63]	Corrales M E, de Nalda R, Bañares L 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1345 Google Scholar
[64]	Bouallagui A, Zanchet A, Bañares L, García-Vela A 2023 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25 20365 Google Scholar
[65]	Rozgonyi T, González L 2008 J. Phys. Chem. A 112 5573 Google Scholar
[66]	Shu C C, Rozgonyi T, González L, Henriksen N E 2012 J. Chem. Phys. 136 174303 Google Scholar
[67]	Chicharro D, Marggi Poullain S, González-Vázquez J, Bañares L 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 013945 Google Scholar
[68]	Muthiah B, Kasai T, Lin K C 2021 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23 6098 Google Scholar
[69]	Lanczos C 1950 J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand 45 255 Google Scholar
[70]	Park T J, Light J 1986 J. Chem. Phys. 85 5870 Google Scholar
[71]	Sun Z, Yang C, Zheng Y 2015 J. Chem. Phys. 143 224309 Google Scholar
[72]	Kosloff R 1988 J. Phys. Chem. 92 2087 Google Scholar
[73]	Simpson J R, Roslyak O, Duque J G, Hároz E H, Crochet J J, Telg H, Piryatinski A, Walker A R H, Doorn S K 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 637 Google Scholar
[74]	Guo Y, Shu C C, Dong D, Nori F 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 223202 Google Scholar
[75]	Shapiro M, Brumer P 2012 Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (New York: John Wiley & Sons) pp95–152

[1]	韦进志, 王金浩, 陈俊学. 相干控制的布洛赫表面波偏振转换. 物理学报, 2023, 72(21): 214201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231050
[2]	赵嘉琳, 程开, 于雪克, 赵纪军, 苏艳. 几种典型含能材料光激发解离的含时密度泛函理论研究. 物理学报, 2021, 70(20): 203301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210670
[3]	孟达, 从鑫, 冷宇辰, 林妙玲, 王佳宏, 喻彬璐, 刘雪璐, 喻学锋, 谭平恒. 黑磷的多声子共振拉曼散射. 物理学报, 2020, 69(16): 167803. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200696
[4]	颜逸辉, 刘玉柱, 丁鹏飞, 尹文怡. 利用速度成像技术研究碘乙烷多光子电离解离动力学. 物理学报, 2018, 67(20): 203301. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181468
[5]	罗金龙, 凌丰姿, 李帅, 王艳梅, 张冰. 丁酮3s里德堡态的超快光解动力学研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(2): 023301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.023301
[6]	秦朝朝, 黄燕, 彭玉峰. Br2分子在360610 nm的光解离动力学研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(19): 193301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.193301
[7]	刘玉柱, 陈云云, 郑改革, 金峰, Gregor Knopp. 氟利昂F113分子在飞秒激光作用下的多光子电离解离动力学. 物理学报, 2016, 65(5): 053302. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.053302
[8]	刘玉柱, 肖韶荣, 王俊锋, 何仲福, 邱学军, Gregor Knopp. 氟利昂F1110分子在飞秒激光脉冲作用下的多光子解离动力学. 物理学报, 2016, 65(11): 113301. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.113301
[9]	刘玉柱, 邓绪兰, 李帅, 管跃, 李静, 龙金友, 张冰. 氟利昂F114B2分子在飞秒紫外辐射下的解离动力学. 物理学报, 2016, 65(19): 193301. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.193301
[10]	张蕾, 戈燕, 张向阳. 基于量子相干控制吸收的准Λ型四能级原子局域化研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(13): 134204. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.134204
[11]	杨雪, 闫冰, 连科研, 丁大军. 1,2-环己二酮基态光解离反应的理论研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(21): 213101. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.213101
[12]	姚云华, 卢晨晖, 徐淑武, 丁晶新, 贾天卿, 张诗按, 孙真荣. 飞秒激光脉冲整形技术及其应用. 物理学报, 2014, 63(18): 184201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.184201
[13]	姚洪斌, 张季, 彭敏, 李文亮. H2+在强激光场中的解离及其量子调控的理论研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(19): 198202. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.198202
[14]	徐天宇, 何峰. H2+在阿秒以及双色飞秒激光脉冲中解离时电子位置的相干控制. 物理学报, 2013, 62(6): 068201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.068201
[15]	刘玉柱, 肖韶荣, 张成义, 郑改革, 陈云云. 离子速度成像系统校准及1,4-氯溴丁烷的紫外光解动力学. 物理学报, 2012, 61(19): 193301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.193301
[16]	苏家妮, 邓文武, 李高翔. 四能级原子介质中Goos-Hnchen位移的相干控制. 物理学报, 2012, 61(14): 144210. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.144210
[17]	张俊, 谭平恒, 赵伟杰. 利用径向呼吸模及其倍频模的共振特性精确测定单壁碳纳米管的电子跃迁能量. 物理学报, 2010, 59(11): 7966-7973. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.7966
[18]	李瑞, 闫冰, 赵书涛, 郭庆群, 连科研, 田传进, 潘守甫. CH3I分子的光解离的自旋-轨道从头计算. 物理学报, 2008, 57(7): 4130-4133. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4130
[19]	郭红, 李高翔, 彭金生. 双通道离化系统的相干控制. 物理学报, 2002, 51(11): 2517-2523. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2517
[20]	黄仕华, 莫玉东. Hg1-xCdxTe的共振拉曼散射. 物理学报, 2001, 50(5): 964-967. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.964

计量

文章访问数: 297
PDF下载量: 29
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

超快强场相干调控氯溴甲烷分子的解离研究