扭角双层石墨烯中磁性和手性d + id超导态的量子蒙特卡罗研究

方世超; 廖心怡

doi:10.7498/aps.74.20250305

摘要

为深入理解扭角双层石墨烯系统中关联态之间的关系和超导配对机理以及扭转角度对超导电性的影响, 采用大尺度无偏差的约束路径量子蒙特卡罗方法在构建的扭角双层石墨烯有效二轨道哈伯德模型中进行了系统的数值模拟. 首先, 从电声子耦合的层面, 数值模拟结果显示晶格间近邻吸引库仑相互作用强烈地增强系统主导的手性${\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}}$超导电子配对对称性, 并且发现布里渊区Γ点附近的反铁磁序也存在同样的增强效应, 这说明反铁磁序是形成手性${\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}}$超导态的先决条件. 更为重要的是此理论结果表明电声子耦合对调控超导电性具有重要的作用. 其次, 从双层石墨烯扭转角度的层面, 讨论了扭转角度对超导电性的影响, 数值模拟结果表明扭转角度在1.08°附近, 随着扭转角度的减小系统主导的手性${\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}}$超导电子配对对称性以及反铁磁序同样表现出增强的协同效应. 本文的研究结果为进一步揭示扭角双层石墨烯中的超导机理和提高系统的超导临界转变温度提供了重要的研究方向.

关键词:

Abstract

We employ a large-scale, unbiased constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo method to systematically simulate the effective two-orbital Hubbard model for twisted bilayer graphene in order to gain deeper insight into the relationship between correlated states and the superconducting pairing mechanism in twisted bilayer graphene, as well as the influence of the twist angle on superconductivity. Initially, we investigate the modulation of superconductivity by nearest-neighbor attractive Coulomb interactions, demonstrating that electron-phonon coupling plays a significant role in the system. Our numerical results reveal that the superconducting state is dominated by chiral NN-${\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $ superconducting electron pairing symmetry, and that such nearest-neighbor attractive Coulomb interactions significantly enhance the effective long-range pairing correlation function of chiral NN-${\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $ wave. From this perspective, it is evident that the electron-phonon coupling positively contributes to the superconductivity of the system.Then, we explore how the twist angle affects the superconducting state. The flat-band structure caused by hopping anisotropy reflects the different twist angles of the system. Our results show that as the twist angle deviates downward from 1.08°, the effective pairing correlation function of the chiral NN-${\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $ wave increases substantially. Conversely, as the twist angle exceeds 1.08°, the effective correlation function of the chiral NN-${\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $ wave exhibits a tendency of decline. These results suggest that further reduction of the twist angle may lead to higher superconducting transition temperature in twisted bilayer graphene system.Finally, we analyze how nearest-neighbor attractive Coulomb interactions and flat-band structures influence superconductivity from the standpoint of magnetic properties. The observed enhancement of the spin structure factor near the Γ point in the Brillouin zone indicates that enhanced antiferromagnetic correlations are essential for enhancing the superconducting transition temperature and for stabilizing chiral NN-${\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $ wave. Through these investigations, our numerical findings not only contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of strongly correlated systems such as twisted bilayer graphene, but also provide guidance for identifying twist-angle systems with potentially higher superconducting transition temperatures.

Keywords:

chiral $\mathrm{d}+\mathrm{id} $ superconducting state /
constrained path quantum Monte Carlo method /
twisted bilayer graphene /
magnetism

作者及机构信息

南阳理工学院数理学院, 南阳　473004

通信作者: 方世超, shichaofang@nyist.edu.cn ; 廖心怡, 2210445033@nyist.edu.cn

基金项目: 南阳理工学院博士科研启动基金(批准号: NGBJ-2022-43)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

School of Mathematics and Physics, Nanyang Institute of Technology, Nanyang 473004, China

Corresponding author: FANG Shichao, shichaofang@nyist.edu.cn ; LIAO Xinyi, 2210445033@nyist.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the Doctoral Research Start-up Fund Project of Nanyang Institute of Technology, China (Grant No. NGBJ-2022-43).

文章全文

参考文献

[1]	Cao Y, Fatemi V, Fang S, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Kaxiras E, Jarillo-Herrero P 2018 Nature 556 43 Google Scholar
[2]	Cao Y, Fatemi V, Demir A, Fang S, Tomarken S L, Luo J Y, Sanchez-Yamagishi J D, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Kaxiras E, Ashoori R C, Jarillo-Herrero P 2018 Nature 556 80 Google Scholar
[3]	Oh M, Nuckolls K P, Wong D, Lee R L, Liu X, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Yazdani A 2021 Nature 600 240 Google Scholar
[4]	Lu X B, Stepanov P, Yang W, Xie M, Aamir M A, Das I, Urgell C, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Zhang G, Bachtold A, MacDonald A H, Efetov D K 2019 Nature 574 653 Google Scholar
[5]	Cao Y, Chowdhury D, Rodan-Legrain D, Rubies-Bigorda O, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Senthil T, Jarillo-Herrero P 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 076801 Google Scholar
[6]	Jaoui A, Das I, Di Battista G, Díez-Mérida J, Lu X, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Ishizuka H, Levitov L, Efetov D K 2022 Nat. Phys. 18 633 Google Scholar
[7]	Serlin M, Tschirhart C L, Polshyn H, Zhang Y, Zhu J, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Balents L, Young A F 2020 Science 367 900 Google Scholar
[8]	Tilak N, Lai X, Wu S, Zhang Z, Xu M, de Almeida Ribeiro R, Canfield P C, Andrei E Y 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 4180 Google Scholar
[9]	Lisi S, Lu X, Benschop T, de Jong T A, Stepanov P, Duran J R, Margot F, Cucchi I, Cappelli E, Hunter A, Tamai A, Kandyba V, Giampietri A, Barinov A, Jobst J, Stalman V, Leeuwenhoek M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Rademaker L, van der Molen S J, Allan M P, Efetov D K, Baumberger F 2021 Nat. Phys. 17 189 Google Scholar
[10]	Haddadi F, Wu Q, Kruchkov A J, Yazyev O V 2020 Nano Lett. 20 2410 Google Scholar
[11]	Cao Y, Rodan-Legrain D, Park J M, Yuan N F Q, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Fernandes R M, Fu L, Jarillo-Herrero P 2021 Science 372 264 Google Scholar
[12]	Hasegawa Y, Kohmoto M 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 125426 Google Scholar
[13]	刘健鹏, 戴希 2020 物理学报 69 147301 Google Scholar Liu J P, Dai X 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 147301 Google Scholar
[14]	Lucignano P, Alfè D, Cataudella V, Ninno D, Cantele G 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 195419 Google Scholar
[15]	Yuan N F Q, Fu L 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 045103 Google Scholar
[16]	Yuan N F Q, Fu L 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 079901 Google Scholar
[17]	Po H C, Zou L, Vishwanath A, Senthil T 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031089 Google Scholar
[18]	Kennes D M, Lischner J, Karrasch C 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 241407 Google Scholar
[19]	Huang T, Zhang L, Ma T 2019 Sci. Bull. 64 310 Google Scholar
[20]	Guo H, Zhu X, Feng S, Scalettar R T 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 235453 Google Scholar
[21]	Gu X, Chen C, Leaw J N, Laksono E, Pereira V M, Vignale G, Adam S 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 180506 Google Scholar
[22]	Van Loon S, Sá de Melo C A R 2025 Phys. Rev. B 111 064515 Google Scholar
[23]	Ray S, Jung J, Das T 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 134515 Google Scholar
[24]	Roy B, Juričić V 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 121407 Google Scholar
[25]	Peltonen T J, Ojajärvi R, Heikkilä T T 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 220504 Google Scholar
[26]	Pahlevanzadeh B, Sahebsara P, Sénéchal D 2021 SciPost Phys. 11 017 Google Scholar
[27]	Pangburn E, Alvarado M, Awoga O A, Pépin C, Bena C 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 184515 Google Scholar
[28]	Wagner G, Kwan Y H, Bultinck N, Simon S H, Parameswaran S A 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 214517 Google Scholar
[29]	Wang Y, Kang J, Fernandes R M 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 024506 Google Scholar
[30]	Liu C C, Zhang L D, Chen W Q, Yang F 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 217001 Google Scholar
[31]	Chen C, Nuckolls K P, Ding S, Miao W, Wong D, Oh M, Lee R L, He S, Peng C, Pei D, Li Y, Hao C, Yan H, Xiao H, Gao H, Li Q, Zhang S, Liu J, He L, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Jozwiak C, Bostwick A, Rotenberg E, Li C, Han X, Pan D, Liu Z, Dai X, Liu C, Bernevig B A, Wang Y, Yazdani A, Chen Y 2024 Nature 636 342 Google Scholar
[32]	Lian B, Wang Z, Bernevig B A 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 257002 Google Scholar
[33]	Wu F, MacDonald A H, Martin I 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 257001 Google Scholar
[34]	Liu C X, Chen Y, Yazdani A, Bernevig B A 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 045133 Google Scholar
[35]	Girotto N, Linhart L, Libisch F 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 155415 Google Scholar
[36]	Choi Y W, Choi H J 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 241412 Google Scholar
[37]	Das Sarma S, Wu F 2020 Ann. Phys. 417 168193 Google Scholar
[38]	Gao S, Zhou J J, Luo Y, Bernardi M 2024 Phys. Rev. Mater. 8 L051001 Google Scholar
[39]	Nam N N T, Koshino M 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 075311 Google Scholar
[40]	Trotter H F 1959 Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 10 545 Google Scholar
[41]	Suzuki M 1976 Commun. Math. Phys. 51 183 Google Scholar
[42]	Hirsch J E 1983 Phys. Rev. B 28 4059 Google Scholar
[43]	Zhang S, Carlson J, Gubernatis J E 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 7464 Google Scholar
[44]	Shi H, Zhang S 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 125132 Google Scholar
[45]	Shi H, Jiménez-Hoyos C A, Rodríguez-Guzmán R, Scuseria G E, Zhang S 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 125129 Google Scholar
[46]	Vitali E, Shi H, Qin M, Zhang S 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 085140 Google Scholar
[47]	Xu X Y, Wessel S, Meng Z Y 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 115105 Google Scholar
[48]	Ying T, Wessel S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 075127 Google Scholar
[49]	Fang S C, Liu G K, Lin H Q, Huang Z B 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 115135 Google Scholar
[50]	Fang S C, Zheng X J, Lin H Q, Huang Z B 2020 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33 025601 Google Scholar
[51]	Chen Z, Wang Y, Rebec S N, Jia T, Hashimoto M, Lu D, Moritz B, Moore R G, Devereaux T P, Shen Z X 2021 Science 373 1235 Google Scholar
[52]	Wang Y, Chen Z, Shi T, Moritz B, Shen Z X, Devereaux T P 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 197003 Google Scholar
[53]	Cheng K, Fang S C, Huang Z B 2024 Phys. Rev. B 109 014519 Google Scholar
[54]	Damascelli A, Hussain Z, Shen Z X 2003 Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 473 Google Scholar
[55]	Halboth C J, Metzner W 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 5162 Google Scholar
[56]	Headings N S, Hayden S M, Coldea R, Perring T G 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 247001 Google Scholar
[57]	Sun Z, Lin H Q 2024 Phys. Rev. B 109 035107 Google Scholar
[58]	Dai P 2015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 855 Google Scholar
[59]	Johnston D C 2010 Adv. Phys. 59 803 Google Scholar
[60]	Mebratie G, Abera B, Mekuye B, Bekele T 2024 Results in Physics 57 107446 Google Scholar
[61]	Gong Z, Zou J, Xu G 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 085128 Google Scholar
[62]	Li Q, Zhang H, Wang Y, Chen W, Bao C, Liu Q, Lin T, Zhang S, Zhang H, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Avila J, Dudin P, Li Q, Yu P, Duan W, Song Z, Zhou S 2024 Nat. Mater. 23 1070 Google Scholar
[63]	Tarnopolsky G, Kruchkov A J, Vishwanath A 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 106405 Google Scholar
[64]	Chou Y Z, Tan Y, Wu F, Das Sarma S 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 L041108 Google Scholar
[65]	Yu G, Wang Y, Katsnelson M I, Yuan S 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 045138 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 (a)扭角双层石墨烯有效两轨道哈伯德模型电子跳跃项示意图. 黑色(红色)点代表子格子A (B), 每个晶格点包含两个轨道. $ t_{1}, t_{1}' $表示最近邻电子跳跃积分, $ t_{2}, t_{2}' $代表第五近邻电子跳跃积分. (b)扭转角度为1.08°、晶格尺寸$ L = 5 $的晶格结构示意图. 黑色和红色子格点表示第一层不等价的碳原子A和碳原子B, 绿色和蓝色表示第二层不等价的碳原子$ A_{1} $和碳原子$ B_{1} $. 三条黑色的曲线表示周期性结构边长

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram illustrating the electron hopping terms of effective two-orbital Hubbard model on the twisted bilayer graphene. The black (red) dots represent sublattice A (B), with each lattice point containing two orbitals. The hopping integrals $ t_{1} $ and $ t_{1}' $ correspond to nearest-neighbor interactions, while $ t_{2} $ and $ t_{2}' $ represent the fifth-nearest-neighbor interactions. (b) Schematic of the lattice structure with a twist angle of 1.08° and lattice size $ L = 5 $. Black and red points correspond to the inequivalent carbon atoms A and B in the first layer, while green and blue points represent the inequivalent atoms $ A_{1} $ and $ B_{1} $ in the second layer. The three black curves denote the periodic boundary lengths of the structure.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 各种轨道内电子配对形式的示意图　(a) NN-s对称性; (b) NN-$ {\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $对称性; (c) NN-$ {\mathrm{p}}+{\mathrm{ip}} $对称性; (d) NNN-$ {\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $对称性; (e) NNN-$ {\mathrm{p}}+{\mathrm{ip}} $对称性; (f) NNN-f对称性

Fig. 2. Schematic diagrams of various intra-orbital electron pairing symmetry: (a) NN-s-wave symmetry; (b) NN-$ {\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $-wave symmetry; (c) NN-$ {\mathrm{p}}+{\mathrm{ip}} $-wave symmetry; (d) NNN-$ {\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $-wave symmetry; (e) NNN-${\mathrm{p}}+{\mathrm{ip}} $-wave symmetry; (f) NNN-f-wave symmetry.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 晶格大小为$ L = 5 $的各种电子配对对称性的配对关联函数$ P_{\alpha}(R) $随配对距离R的变化　(a) $ U = 2.0,V =0.0, $$ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (b) $ U = 0.0, V = -0.3, \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (c) $ U = 2.0, V = 0.0, \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $; (d) $ U = 0.0,V = -0.3,\langle n \rangle =0.893 $

Fig. 3. Pairing correlation functions $ P_{\alpha}(R) $ as a function of pairing distance R for various electron pairing symmetries in a lattice of size $ L = 5 $: (a) $ U = 2.0 $, $ V = 0.0 $, $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (b) $ U = 0.0 $, $ V = -0.3 $, $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (c) $ U = 2.0 $, $ V = 0.0 $, $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $; (d) $ U = 0.0 $, $ V = -0.3 $, $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 无相互作用项时晶格大小为$ L = 5 $的各种电子配对对称性的配对关联函数$ P_{\alpha}(R) $随配对距离R的变化　(a) $ \langle n \rangle = $$ 0.933 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $

Fig. 4. Pairing correlation functions $ P_{\alpha}(R) $ as a function of pairing distance R for various electron pairing symmetries in a non-interacting system with lattice size $ L = 5 $: (a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 在位库仑相互作用强度$ U = 2.0 $时, 晶格大小为$ L = 5 $的各种电子配对对称性的平均有效配对关联函数$ \overline{V}_{\alpha}(R\geqslant3) $随近邻库仑相互作用强度V的变化　(a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $

Fig. 5. Average effective pairing correlation functions $ \overline{V}_{\alpha}(R\geqslant3) $ as a function of nearest-neighbor Coulomb interaction V for various electron pairing symmetries in a system with on-site Coulomb interaction strength $ U = 2.0 $ and lattice size $ L = 5 $: (a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 在位库仑相互作用强度$ U = 2.0 $时, 晶格大小为$ L = 6 $的手性NN-$ {\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $波配对对称性的有效配对关联函数$ {V}_{{\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}}} $随长程配对距离R的变化　(a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.954 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.926 $

Fig. 6. Effective pairing correlation functions $ {V}_{{\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}}} $ as a function of long-range pairing distance R for the chiral NN-$ {\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $-wave pairing symmetry in a system with on-site Coulomb interaction strength $ U = 2.0 $ and lattice size $ L = 6 $: (a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.954 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.926 $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 在位库仑相互作用强度$ U = 2.0 $时, 晶格大小为$ L = 5 $的自旋结构因子$ S(q) $沿着第一布里渊区高对称线$ \varGamma \to M \to $$ K \to \varGamma $方向的变化曲线　(a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $. 插图中的紫色线代表第一布里渊区的高对称线, 这里Γ, M, K的坐标分别为$ (0, 0) $, $ \Big(\dfrac{2\pi}{3}, 0\Big) $, $ \Big(\dfrac{2\pi}{3\sqrt{3}}, 0\Big) $

Fig. 7. Spin structure factor $ S(q) $ along the high-symmetry lines $ \varGamma \to M \to K \to \varGamma $ in the first Brillouin zone for a system with on-site Coulomb interaction strength $ U = 2.0 $ and lattice size $ L = 5 $: (a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $. The inset shows the high-symmetry lines in the first Brillouin zone, with the coordinates of Γ, M, and K given by $ (0, 0) $, $\Big(\dfrac{2\pi}{3}, 0\Big) $, and $ \Big(\dfrac{2\pi}{3\sqrt{3}}, 0\Big) $, respectively. The purple lines in the inset represent the high-symmetry lines.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 无相互作用的哈伯德模型对应的能带结构和态密度　(a), (c), (e)分别为$ t_{1}' = t_{2}' = 0.15 $, $ t_{1}' = t_{2}' = 0.10 $, $ t_{1}' = t_{2}' = 0.05 $的情况下能带沿着第一布里渊区高对称线方向的演化曲线; (b), (d), (f)分别为$ t_{1}' = t_{2}' = 0.15 $, $ t_{1}' = t_{2}' = 0.10 $, $ t_{1}' = t_{2}' = 0.05 $的情况下状态数关于能量的函数关系, 红色虚线和蓝色虚线分别对应电子填充浓度为$ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $和$ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $的费米能级位置

Fig. 8. Band structure and density of states (DOS) for the non-interacting Hubbard model. Panels (a), (c), and (e) display the band dispersion along the high-symmetry lines in the first Brillouin zone for $ t_{1}' = t_{2}' = 0.15 $, $ t_{1}' = t_{2}' = 0.10 $, and $ t_{1}' = t_{2}' = 0.05 $, respectively. Panels (b), (d), and (f) show the density of states as a function of energy for the same values of $ t_{1}' = t_{2}' $. The red and blue dashed lines represent the Fermi level positions corresponding to electron fillings of $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $ and $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $, respectively.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 在位库仑相互作用强度$ U = 2.0 $及近邻库仑相互作用强度$ V = 0.0 $时, 晶格大小为$ L = 5 $的各种电子配对对称性的平均有效配对关联函数$ \overline{V}_{\alpha}(R\geqslant3) $随电子跳跃破缺项$ t_{1, 2}' $的变化　(a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $

Fig. 9. Average effective pairing correlation functions $ \overline{V}{\alpha}(R \geqslant 3) $ as a function of electron hopping anisotropy terms $ t_{1, 2}' $ for various electron pairing symmetries in a system with on-site Coulomb interaction strength $ U = 2.0 $, nearest-neighbor Coulomb interaction strength $ V = 0.0 $, and lattice size $ L = 5 $: (a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 平带结构调控下, 在位库仑相互作用强度$ U = 2.0 $及近邻库仑相互作用强度$ V = 0.0 $时, 晶格大小为$ L = 6 $的手性NN-$ {\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}} $波配对对称性有效配对关联函数$ V_{{\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}}} $随长程配对距离R的变化　(a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.954 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.926 $

Fig. 10. Effective pairing correlation function $ V_{{\mathrm{d}}+{\mathrm{id}}} $ as a function of the long-range pairing distance R for the chiral NN-$ {\rm d+id} $-wave pairing symmetry with lattice size $ L = 6 $ under flat band structure modulation with an on-site Coulomb interaction strength of $ U = 2.0 $ and nearest-neighbor Coulomb interaction strength of $ V = 0.0 $: (a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.954 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.926 $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 平带结构调控下, 在位库仑相互作用强度$ U = 2.0 $、近邻库仑相互作用强度$ V = 0.0 $、晶格大小为$ L = 5 $时, 自旋结构因子$ S(q) $沿着第一布里渊区高对称线$ \varGamma \to M \to K \to \varGamma $方向的变化曲线　(a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $

Fig. 11. Spin structure factor $ S(q) $ along the high-symmetry lines $ \varGamma \to M \to K \to \varGamma $ in the first Brillouin zone for a system with on-site Coulomb interaction strength $ U = 2.0 $, nearest-neighbor Coulomb interaction strength $ V = 0.0 $, and lattice size $ L = 5 $, under flat band structure modulation: (a) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.933 $; (b) $ \langle n \rangle = 0.893 $.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

[1]	Cao Y, Fatemi V, Fang S, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Kaxiras E, Jarillo-Herrero P 2018 Nature 556 43 Google Scholar
[2]	Cao Y, Fatemi V, Demir A, Fang S, Tomarken S L, Luo J Y, Sanchez-Yamagishi J D, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Kaxiras E, Ashoori R C, Jarillo-Herrero P 2018 Nature 556 80 Google Scholar
[3]	Oh M, Nuckolls K P, Wong D, Lee R L, Liu X, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Yazdani A 2021 Nature 600 240 Google Scholar
[4]	Lu X B, Stepanov P, Yang W, Xie M, Aamir M A, Das I, Urgell C, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Zhang G, Bachtold A, MacDonald A H, Efetov D K 2019 Nature 574 653 Google Scholar
[5]	Cao Y, Chowdhury D, Rodan-Legrain D, Rubies-Bigorda O, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Senthil T, Jarillo-Herrero P 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 076801 Google Scholar
[6]	Jaoui A, Das I, Di Battista G, Díez-Mérida J, Lu X, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Ishizuka H, Levitov L, Efetov D K 2022 Nat. Phys. 18 633 Google Scholar
[7]	Serlin M, Tschirhart C L, Polshyn H, Zhang Y, Zhu J, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Balents L, Young A F 2020 Science 367 900 Google Scholar
[8]	Tilak N, Lai X, Wu S, Zhang Z, Xu M, de Almeida Ribeiro R, Canfield P C, Andrei E Y 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 4180 Google Scholar
[9]	Lisi S, Lu X, Benschop T, de Jong T A, Stepanov P, Duran J R, Margot F, Cucchi I, Cappelli E, Hunter A, Tamai A, Kandyba V, Giampietri A, Barinov A, Jobst J, Stalman V, Leeuwenhoek M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Rademaker L, van der Molen S J, Allan M P, Efetov D K, Baumberger F 2021 Nat. Phys. 17 189 Google Scholar
[10]	Haddadi F, Wu Q, Kruchkov A J, Yazyev O V 2020 Nano Lett. 20 2410 Google Scholar
[11]	Cao Y, Rodan-Legrain D, Park J M, Yuan N F Q, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Fernandes R M, Fu L, Jarillo-Herrero P 2021 Science 372 264 Google Scholar
[12]	Hasegawa Y, Kohmoto M 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 125426 Google Scholar
[13]	刘健鹏, 戴希 2020 物理学报 69 147301 Google Scholar Liu J P, Dai X 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 147301 Google Scholar
[14]	Lucignano P, Alfè D, Cataudella V, Ninno D, Cantele G 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 195419 Google Scholar
[15]	Yuan N F Q, Fu L 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 045103 Google Scholar
[16]	Yuan N F Q, Fu L 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 079901 Google Scholar
[17]	Po H C, Zou L, Vishwanath A, Senthil T 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031089 Google Scholar
[18]	Kennes D M, Lischner J, Karrasch C 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 241407 Google Scholar
[19]	Huang T, Zhang L, Ma T 2019 Sci. Bull. 64 310 Google Scholar
[20]	Guo H, Zhu X, Feng S, Scalettar R T 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 235453 Google Scholar
[21]	Gu X, Chen C, Leaw J N, Laksono E, Pereira V M, Vignale G, Adam S 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 180506 Google Scholar
[22]	Van Loon S, Sá de Melo C A R 2025 Phys. Rev. B 111 064515 Google Scholar
[23]	Ray S, Jung J, Das T 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 134515 Google Scholar
[24]	Roy B, Juričić V 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 121407 Google Scholar
[25]	Peltonen T J, Ojajärvi R, Heikkilä T T 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 220504 Google Scholar
[26]	Pahlevanzadeh B, Sahebsara P, Sénéchal D 2021 SciPost Phys. 11 017 Google Scholar
[27]	Pangburn E, Alvarado M, Awoga O A, Pépin C, Bena C 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 184515 Google Scholar
[28]	Wagner G, Kwan Y H, Bultinck N, Simon S H, Parameswaran S A 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 214517 Google Scholar
[29]	Wang Y, Kang J, Fernandes R M 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 024506 Google Scholar
[30]	Liu C C, Zhang L D, Chen W Q, Yang F 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 217001 Google Scholar
[31]	Chen C, Nuckolls K P, Ding S, Miao W, Wong D, Oh M, Lee R L, He S, Peng C, Pei D, Li Y, Hao C, Yan H, Xiao H, Gao H, Li Q, Zhang S, Liu J, He L, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Jozwiak C, Bostwick A, Rotenberg E, Li C, Han X, Pan D, Liu Z, Dai X, Liu C, Bernevig B A, Wang Y, Yazdani A, Chen Y 2024 Nature 636 342 Google Scholar
[32]	Lian B, Wang Z, Bernevig B A 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 257002 Google Scholar
[33]	Wu F, MacDonald A H, Martin I 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 257001 Google Scholar
[34]	Liu C X, Chen Y, Yazdani A, Bernevig B A 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 045133 Google Scholar
[35]	Girotto N, Linhart L, Libisch F 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 155415 Google Scholar
[36]	Choi Y W, Choi H J 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 241412 Google Scholar
[37]	Das Sarma S, Wu F 2020 Ann. Phys. 417 168193 Google Scholar
[38]	Gao S, Zhou J J, Luo Y, Bernardi M 2024 Phys. Rev. Mater. 8 L051001 Google Scholar
[39]	Nam N N T, Koshino M 2017 Phys. Rev. B 96 075311 Google Scholar
[40]	Trotter H F 1959 Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 10 545 Google Scholar
[41]	Suzuki M 1976 Commun. Math. Phys. 51 183 Google Scholar
[42]	Hirsch J E 1983 Phys. Rev. B 28 4059 Google Scholar
[43]	Zhang S, Carlson J, Gubernatis J E 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 7464 Google Scholar
[44]	Shi H, Zhang S 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 125132 Google Scholar
[45]	Shi H, Jiménez-Hoyos C A, Rodríguez-Guzmán R, Scuseria G E, Zhang S 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 125129 Google Scholar
[46]	Vitali E, Shi H, Qin M, Zhang S 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 085140 Google Scholar
[47]	Xu X Y, Wessel S, Meng Z Y 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 115105 Google Scholar
[48]	Ying T, Wessel S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 075127 Google Scholar
[49]	Fang S C, Liu G K, Lin H Q, Huang Z B 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 115135 Google Scholar
[50]	Fang S C, Zheng X J, Lin H Q, Huang Z B 2020 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33 025601 Google Scholar
[51]	Chen Z, Wang Y, Rebec S N, Jia T, Hashimoto M, Lu D, Moritz B, Moore R G, Devereaux T P, Shen Z X 2021 Science 373 1235 Google Scholar
[52]	Wang Y, Chen Z, Shi T, Moritz B, Shen Z X, Devereaux T P 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 197003 Google Scholar
[53]	Cheng K, Fang S C, Huang Z B 2024 Phys. Rev. B 109 014519 Google Scholar
[54]	Damascelli A, Hussain Z, Shen Z X 2003 Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 473 Google Scholar
[55]	Halboth C J, Metzner W 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 5162 Google Scholar
[56]	Headings N S, Hayden S M, Coldea R, Perring T G 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 247001 Google Scholar
[57]	Sun Z, Lin H Q 2024 Phys. Rev. B 109 035107 Google Scholar
[58]	Dai P 2015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 855 Google Scholar
[59]	Johnston D C 2010 Adv. Phys. 59 803 Google Scholar
[60]	Mebratie G, Abera B, Mekuye B, Bekele T 2024 Results in Physics 57 107446 Google Scholar
[61]	Gong Z, Zou J, Xu G 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 085128 Google Scholar
[62]	Li Q, Zhang H, Wang Y, Chen W, Bao C, Liu Q, Lin T, Zhang S, Zhang H, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Avila J, Dudin P, Li Q, Yu P, Duan W, Song Z, Zhou S 2024 Nat. Mater. 23 1070 Google Scholar
[63]	Tarnopolsky G, Kruchkov A J, Vishwanath A 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 106405 Google Scholar
[64]	Chou Y Z, Tan Y, Wu F, Das Sarma S 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 L041108 Google Scholar
[65]	Yu G, Wang Y, Katsnelson M I, Yuan S 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 045138 Google Scholar

[1]	季怡汝, 褚衍邦, 冼乐德, 杨威, 张广宇. 从“魔角”石墨烯到摩尔超晶格量子模拟器. 物理学报, 2021, 70(11): 118101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210476
[2]	王少霞, 赵旭才, 潘多桥, 庞国旺, 刘晨曦, 史蕾倩, 刘桂安, 雷博程, 黄以能, 张丽丽. 过渡金属(Cr, Mn, Fe, Co)掺杂对TiO₂磁性影响的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2020, 69(19): 197101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200644
[3]	阴敏, 张敏, 吕瑾, 武海顺. TM@Cu₁₂N₁₂团簇磁性的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2019, 68(20): 203102. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190737
[4]	王鑫, 李桦, 董正超, 仲崇贵. 二维应变作用下超导薄膜LiFeAs的磁性和电子性质. 物理学报, 2019, 68(2): 027401. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20180957
[5]	侯清玉, 李勇, 赵春旺. Al掺杂和空位对ZnO磁性影响的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(6): 067202. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.067202
[6]	姚仲瑜, 孙丽, 潘孟美, 孙书娟. 第一性原理研究semi-Heusler合金CoCrTe和CoCrSb的半金属性和磁性. 物理学报, 2016, 65(12): 127501. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.127501
[7]	姜恩海, 朱兴凤, 陈凌孚. Heusler合金Co2MnAl(100)表面电子结构、磁性和自旋极化的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(14): 147301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.147301
[8]	万素磊, 何利民, 向俊尤, 王志国, 邢茹, 张雪峰, 鲁毅, 赵建军. 钙钛矿型锰氧化物(La0.8Eu0.2)4/3Sr5/3Mn2O7的磁性和电性研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(23): 237501. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.237501
[9]	何利民, 冀钰, 鲁毅, 吴鸿业, 张雪峰, 赵建军. 钙钛矿锰氧化物(La1-xEux)4/3Sr5/3Mn2O7(x=0, 0.15)的磁性和电性研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(14): 147503. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.147503
[10]	李诚迪, 赵敬龙, 仲崇贵, 董正超, 方靖淮. 量子顺电EuTiO3材料基态磁性的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(8): 087502. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.087502
[11]	魏哲, 袁健美, 李顺辉, 廖建, 毛宇亮. 含空位二维六角氮化硼电子和磁性质的密度泛函研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(20): 203101. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.203101
[12]	汪冬冬, 高辉. 三维自组装Eu3+-石墨烯复合材料的制备及其磁性研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(18): 188102. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.188102
[13]	赵昆, 张坤, 王家佳, 于金, 吴三械. Heusler合金Pd2 CrAl四方变形、磁性及弹性常数的第一性原理计算. 物理学报, 2011, 60(12): 127101. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.127101
[14]	文黎巍, 王玉梅, 裴慧霞, 丁俊. Sb系half-Heusler合金磁性及电子结构的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(4): 047110. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.047110
[15]	高潭华, 卢道明, 吴顺情, 朱梓忠. Fe原子薄片的磁性:第一性原理计算. 物理学报, 2011, 60(4): 047502. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.047502
[16]	高双红, 任兆玉, 郭平, 郑继明, 杜恭贺, 万丽娟, 郑琳琳. 石墨烯量子点的磁性及激发态性质. 物理学报, 2011, 60(4): 047105. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.047105
[17]	潘洪哲, 徐明, 陈丽, 孙媛媛, 王永龙. 单层正三角锯齿型石墨烯量子点的电子结构和磁性. 物理学报, 2010, 59(9): 6443-6449. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6443
[18]	陈珊, 吴青云, 陈志高, 许桂贵, 黄志高. ZnO1-xCx稀磁半导体的磁特性的第一性原理和蒙特卡罗研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(3): 2011-2017. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2011
[19]	马荣, 张加宏, 杜锦丽, 刘甦, 刘楣. 新超导体MgCNi3的虚晶掺杂研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(12): 6580-6584. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6580
[20]	张加宏, 马荣, 刘甦, 刘楣. 掺杂MgCNi3超导电性和磁性的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(9): 4816-4821. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4816

计量

文章访问数: 401
PDF下载量: 12
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

扭角双层石墨烯中磁性和手性d + id超导态的量子蒙特卡罗研究