Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Point-contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy on Re3W superconductor

Wang Zong Hou Xing-Yuan Pan Bo-Jin Gu Ya-Dong Zhang Meng-Di Zhang Fan Chen Gen-Fu Ren Zhi-An Shan Lei

Wang Wei, Liu Wei, Xie Sen, Ge Hao-Ran, Ouyang Yu-Jie, Zhang Cheng, Hua Fu-Qiang, Zhang Min, Tang Xin-Feng. epitaxial growth, intrinsic point defects and electronic transport optimization of MnTe films. Acta Phys. Sin., 2022, 71(13): 137102. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212350
Citation: Wang Wei, Liu Wei, Xie Sen, Ge Hao-Ran, Ouyang Yu-Jie, Zhang Cheng, Hua Fu-Qiang, Zhang Min, Tang Xin-Feng. epitaxial growth, intrinsic point defects and electronic transport optimization of MnTe films. Acta Phys. Sin., 2022, 71(13): 137102. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212350

Point-contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy on Re3W superconductor

Wang Zong, Hou Xing-Yuan, Pan Bo-Jin, Gu Ya-Dong, Zhang Meng-Di, Zhang Fan, Chen Gen-Fu, Ren Zhi-An, Shan Lei
PDF
Get Citation

(PLEASE TRANSLATE TO ENGLISH

BY GOOGLE TRANSLATE IF NEEDED.)

  • Non-centrosymmetric superconductors have received considerable attention because of their possible possession of unconventional spin-triplet pairing.For this reason,the non-centrosymmetric Re3W with α -Mn structure has been widely concerned.However,almost all the previous studies support that the non-centrosymmetric phase of Re3W is a conventional weak-coupling s-wave superconductor.Later on,it is proved that Re3W has two different superconducting phases,one is the non-centrosymmetric phase and the other has a centrosymmetric hexagonal structure.Thus,a comparative study of these two superconducting phases could provide more information about the effect of non-centrosymmetric structure on the pairing symmetry of Re3W.
    In this paper,point-contact Andreev reflection experiments are carried out on Re3W/Au and the data can be well fitted by isotropic s-wave Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk (BTK) theory.In combination with our previous researches,we find that both centrosymmetric and non-centrosymmetric phases have similar temperature dependence of superconducting gap () with almost the same gap ratio of /Tc.These results present strong evidence that both phases of Re3W are weak coupling Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer superconductors.
    Another interesting finding is that both phases of Re3W could easily form an ideal point-contact junction (i.e.,inelastic scatterings at the interface can be ignored) with a normal metal tip.This is manifested as an extremely small broadening factor (Γ) used in the fitting process,and indicates a clean (and possibly transparent) interface.Keeping this in mind,we can assume that the effective barrier (Z) at the interface mainly comes from the mismatch between the Fermi velocity of the superconductor and that of the normal metal,which can be estimated from the formula Z2=(1-r)2/4r,where r is the ratio between those two Fermi velocities.From this formula,we can obtain the Fermi velocity of Re3W by using the known value of Au's Fermi velocity and the fitting parameter Z for the Re3W/Au point contacts.It is interesting to find that the chemical property of Re3W is stable in the atmospheric environment.Even if the samples are exposed to the atmospheric environment for nearly six months,the inelastic scatterings are still very weak,and the superconducting properties are unchanged.
    Such an exceptional performance of Re3W can be utilized to study the physical properties of its counter electrode in a point contact.As an attempt,we build a point contact between Re3W and a ferromagnetic Ni tip,and measure its Andreev reflection spectra which are then fitted with a modified BTK model by considering spin polarization.The determined spin polarization of Ni is in good agreement with previously reported result. Moreover,using the Fermi velocities of Re3W and Ni,we can calculate the effective barrier to be around 0.3 in the Re3W/Ni interface,which coincides with the fitting parameter Z.These results self-consistently demonstrate the validity of the determination of Re3W's Fermi velocity and the cleanness/transparency of the studied point-contact interface.
      PACS:
      07.05.Tp(Computer modeling and simulation)
      41.20.Gz(Magnetostatics; magnetic shielding, magnetic induction, boundary-value problems)
      41.90.+e(Other topics in electromagnetism; electron and ion optics)
    [1]

    Bauer E, Hilscher G, Michor H, Paul C, Scheidt E W, Gribanov A, Seropegin Y, Noël H, Sigrist M, Rogl P 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 027003

    [2]

    Gor'kov L P, Rashba E I 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 037004

    [3]

    Frigeri P A, Agterberg D F, Koga A, Sigrist M 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 097001

    [4]

    Bauer E, Sigrist M 2012 Non-Centrosymmetric Superconductors: Introduction and Overview (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag) pp4-5

    [5]

    Izawa K, Kasahara Y, Matsuda Y, Behnia K, Yasuda T, Settai R, Onuki Y 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 197002

    [6]

    Bonalde I, Brämer-Escamilla W, Bauer E 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 207002

    [7]

    Yuan H Q, Agterberg D F, Hayashi N, Badica P, Vandervelde D, Togano K, Sigrist M, Salamon M B 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 017006

    [8]

    Sato M, Fujimoto S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 094504

    [9]

    Chadov S, Qi X L, Kübler J, Fecher G H, Felser C, Zhang S C 2010 Nat. Mater. 9 541

    [10]

    Blaugher R D, Hulm J K 1961 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19 134

    [11]

    Blaugher R D, Taylor A, Hulm J K 1962 IBM J. Res. Dev. 6 116

    [12]

    Zuev Y L, Kuznetsova V A, Prozorov R, Vannette M D, Lobanov M V, Christen D K, Thompson J R 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 132508

    [13]

    Huang Y, Yan J, Wang Y L, Shan L, Luo Q, Wang W H, Wen H H 2008 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 21 075011

    [14]

    Blonder G E, Tinkham M, Klapwijk T M 1982 Phys. Rev. B 25 4515

    [15]

    Biswas P K, Lees M R, Hillier A D, Smith R I, Marshall W G, Paul D M 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 184529

    [16]

    Chu C W, McMillan W L, Luo H L 1971 Phys. Rev. B 3 3757

    [17]

    Dynes R C, Narayanamurti V, Garno J P 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 1509

    [18]

    Dynes R C, Garno J P, Hertel G B, Orlando T P 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 2437

    [19]

    Plecenik A, Grajcar M, Beňačka Š, Seidel P, Pfuch A 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 10016

    [20]

    Soulen R J, Byers J M, Osofsky M S, Nadgorny B, Ambrose T, Cheng S F, Broussard P R, Tanaka C T, Nowak J, Moodera J S, Barry A, Coey J M D 1998 Science 282 85

    [21]

    Nadgorny B, Soulen Jr R J, Osofsky M S, Mazin I I, Laprade G, van de Veerdonk R J M, Smits A A, Cheng S F, Skelton E F, Qadri S B 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 3788

    [22]

    Ji Y, Strijkers G J, Yang F Y, Chien C L, Byers J M, Anguelouch A, Xiao G, Gupta A 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 5585

    [23]

    Panguluri R P, Tsoi G, Nadgorny B, Chun S H, Samarth N, Mazin I I 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 201307

    [24]

    Clowes S K, Miyoshi Y, Bugoslavsky Y, Branford W R, Grigorescu C, Manea S A, Monnereau O, Cohen L F 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 214425

    [25]

    Biswas P K, Hillier A D, Lees M R, Paul D M 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 134505

    [26]

    Daghero D, Gonnelli R S 2010 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 23 043001

    [27]

    Gall D 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 119 85101

    [28]

    Mazin I I, Golubov A A, Nadgorny B 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 7576

    [29]

    Moodera J S, Mathon G 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200 248

    [30]

    Strijkers G J, Ji Y, Yang F Y, Chien C L, Byers J M 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 104510

    期刊类型引用(22)

    1. 田立良,池浩,党杰. 一种优化服务器电磁辐射性能的自动展频方法. 信息技术与信息化. 2023(05): 136-139 . 百度学术
    2. 孙会琴,王思飞,田铮. 孔阵腔体屏蔽效能BLT方程修正与拓展分析. 电光与控制. 2023(07): 100-105 . 百度学术
    3. 张晗,李常贤. 高频有损斜开孔腔体屏蔽效能研究. 微波学报. 2023(06): 12-17+34 . 百度学术
    4. 胡小龙,李常贤. 高速列车屏蔽线转移阻抗与屏蔽效能研究. 电子测量技术. 2022(05): 80-85 . 百度学术
    5. 张岩,田铮,王川川,杨清熙,王思飞. 双层腔体屏蔽效能随孔缝位置与数量变化规律研究. 电工技术学报. 2022(13): 3350-3360 . 百度学术
    6. 于海波,张茂强,张晓波,虞晓阳,熊杰,刘彬. 高集成电力电子设备外壳屏蔽效能评估. 安全与电磁兼容. 2021(01): 69-72+79 . 百度学术
    7. 公延飞,陈星彤,高超飞,孙剑. 一种快速预测有损腔体屏蔽效能和谐振模式的解析模型. 电工技术学报. 2021(08): 1569-1578 . 百度学术
    8. 叶志红,张杰,周健健,苟丹. 有耗介质层上多导体传输线的电磁耦合时域分析方法. 物理学报. 2020(06): 47-54 . 百度学术
    9. 马振洋,左晶,史春蕾,冯嘉诚,刘旭红. 机载电子设备屏蔽效能测试与优化. 航空学报. 2020(07): 226-233 . 百度学术
    10. 王金田,刘雪明,商宝莹,李志勇,穆晓彤. 一种计算任意形状孔缝平均电极化率密度的方法. 电子测量技术. 2019(03): 31-34 . 百度学术
    11. 王殿海,石成英,蔡星会,易昭湘. 有内置薄板腔体的HEMP屏蔽效能研究. 微波学报. 2019(01): 87-90 . 百度学术
    12. 白婉欣,李天乐,郭安琪,成睿琦,焦重庆. 平面波照射下无限大导体板上周期孔阵屏蔽效能的解析研究. 物理学报. 2019(10): 64-72 . 百度学术
    13. 阎芳,刘旭红,王鹏,马振洋,史春蕾,于新海,赵聪. 高强辐射场下不同孔阵的金属腔体屏蔽效能研究. 电光与控制. 2019(08): 90-94+100 . 百度学术
    14. 郝建红,公延飞,蒋璐行,范杰清. 内置电路板的复杂多腔体电磁串扰屏蔽效能的解析研究. 电工技术学报. 2018(03): 670-679 . 百度学术
    15. 郝建红,蒋璐行,范杰清,公延飞. 内置介质板的开孔箱体屏蔽效能电磁拓扑模型. 电工技术学报. 2017(09): 101-111 . 百度学术
    16. 陈珂,杜平安,任丹. 一种基于缝隙天线阻抗的带缝腔体谐振频率计算方法. 电子学报. 2017(01): 232-237 . 百度学术
    17. 高雪莲,马士杰,杨凯,李丹. 考虑高次模的孔缝腔体屏蔽效能计算方法. 高电压技术. 2017(10): 3344-3350 . 百度学术
    18. 刘宁,张如彬,金杰. 投弃式仪器数据传输信道时频响应求解方法. 电波科学学报. 2016(05): 1009-1015 . 百度学术
    19. 阚勇,闫丽萍,赵翔,周海京,刘强,黄卡玛. 基于电磁拓扑的多腔体屏蔽效能快速算法. 物理学报. 2016(03): 88-99 . 百度学术
    20. 张玉廷,李冉,高文军,吕争,张华. 等效导纳模型分析航天器VHF/UHF频段屏蔽效能. 宇航学报. 2016(11): 1392-1397 . 百度学术
    21. 陈珂,王丹丹,杜平安. 孔缝腔体电磁谐振特性的影响因素分析. 中国科技论文. 2016(20): 2307-2311 . 百度学术
    22. 罗静雯,杜平安,任丹,肖培. 基于BLT方程的双层腔体屏蔽效能计算方法. 强激光与粒子束. 2015(11): 166-171 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(16)

  • [1]

    Bauer E, Hilscher G, Michor H, Paul C, Scheidt E W, Gribanov A, Seropegin Y, Noël H, Sigrist M, Rogl P 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 027003

    [2]

    Gor'kov L P, Rashba E I 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 037004

    [3]

    Frigeri P A, Agterberg D F, Koga A, Sigrist M 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 097001

    [4]

    Bauer E, Sigrist M 2012 Non-Centrosymmetric Superconductors: Introduction and Overview (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag) pp4-5

    [5]

    Izawa K, Kasahara Y, Matsuda Y, Behnia K, Yasuda T, Settai R, Onuki Y 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 197002

    [6]

    Bonalde I, Brämer-Escamilla W, Bauer E 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 207002

    [7]

    Yuan H Q, Agterberg D F, Hayashi N, Badica P, Vandervelde D, Togano K, Sigrist M, Salamon M B 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 017006

    [8]

    Sato M, Fujimoto S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 094504

    [9]

    Chadov S, Qi X L, Kübler J, Fecher G H, Felser C, Zhang S C 2010 Nat. Mater. 9 541

    [10]

    Blaugher R D, Hulm J K 1961 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19 134

    [11]

    Blaugher R D, Taylor A, Hulm J K 1962 IBM J. Res. Dev. 6 116

    [12]

    Zuev Y L, Kuznetsova V A, Prozorov R, Vannette M D, Lobanov M V, Christen D K, Thompson J R 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 132508

    [13]

    Huang Y, Yan J, Wang Y L, Shan L, Luo Q, Wang W H, Wen H H 2008 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 21 075011

    [14]

    Blonder G E, Tinkham M, Klapwijk T M 1982 Phys. Rev. B 25 4515

    [15]

    Biswas P K, Lees M R, Hillier A D, Smith R I, Marshall W G, Paul D M 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 184529

    [16]

    Chu C W, McMillan W L, Luo H L 1971 Phys. Rev. B 3 3757

    [17]

    Dynes R C, Narayanamurti V, Garno J P 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 1509

    [18]

    Dynes R C, Garno J P, Hertel G B, Orlando T P 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 2437

    [19]

    Plecenik A, Grajcar M, Beňačka Š, Seidel P, Pfuch A 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 10016

    [20]

    Soulen R J, Byers J M, Osofsky M S, Nadgorny B, Ambrose T, Cheng S F, Broussard P R, Tanaka C T, Nowak J, Moodera J S, Barry A, Coey J M D 1998 Science 282 85

    [21]

    Nadgorny B, Soulen Jr R J, Osofsky M S, Mazin I I, Laprade G, van de Veerdonk R J M, Smits A A, Cheng S F, Skelton E F, Qadri S B 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 3788

    [22]

    Ji Y, Strijkers G J, Yang F Y, Chien C L, Byers J M, Anguelouch A, Xiao G, Gupta A 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 5585

    [23]

    Panguluri R P, Tsoi G, Nadgorny B, Chun S H, Samarth N, Mazin I I 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 201307

    [24]

    Clowes S K, Miyoshi Y, Bugoslavsky Y, Branford W R, Grigorescu C, Manea S A, Monnereau O, Cohen L F 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 214425

    [25]

    Biswas P K, Hillier A D, Lees M R, Paul D M 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 134505

    [26]

    Daghero D, Gonnelli R S 2010 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 23 043001

    [27]

    Gall D 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 119 85101

    [28]

    Mazin I I, Golubov A A, Nadgorny B 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 7576

    [29]

    Moodera J S, Mathon G 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200 248

    [30]

    Strijkers G J, Ji Y, Yang F Y, Chien C L, Byers J M 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 104510

  • [1] LI Zezhong, HONG Wenshan, XIE Tao, LIU Chang, LUO Huiqian. Spin excitation spectra of iron pnictide superconductors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2025, 74(1): 017401. doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241534
    [2] Wen Li, Lu Mao-Wang, Chen Jia-Li, Chen Sai-Yan, Cao Xue-Li, Zhang An-Qi. Transmission time and spin polarization for electron in magnetically confined semiconducotr nanostructure modulated by spin-orbit coupling. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(11): 118504. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240285
    [3] He Ya-Ping, Chen Ming-Xia, Pan Jie-Feng, Li Dong, Lin Gang-Jun, Huang Xin-Hong. Electron-spin polarization effect in Rashba spin-orbit coupling modulated single-layered semiconductor nanostructure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(2): 028503. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221381
    [4] Yu Xiao-Yang, Feng Hong-Lei, Gu Gang-Xu, Liu Yong-He, Li Zhi-Lin, Xu Tong-Shuai, Li Yong-Qing. Andreev reflection spectroscopy of ferromagnetic Fe0.26TaS2 with layered structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(24): 247201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191221
    [5] Gong Dong-Liang, Luo Hui-Qian. Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(20): 207407. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181543
    [6] Jiang Li-Na, Zhang Yu-Bin, Dong Shun-Le. Effect of bipolarons on spin polarized transport in magnetic permeated sublayer of organic spin device. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(14): 147104. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.147104
    [7] Zhang Jing-Lei, Jiao Lin, Pang Gui-Ming, Yuan Hui-Qiu. Order parameters of non-centrosymmetric superconductors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(21): 217403. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.217403
    [8] Wang Rui-Qin, Gong Jian, Wu Jian-Ying, Chen Jun. Time of spin-polarized tunneling through a symmetric double-barrier quantum well structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(8): 087303. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.087303
    [9] He Zhi-Gang, Cheng Xing-Hua, Gong Min, Cai Juan-Lu, Shi Rui-Ying. The factors influencing spin-polarized transport in magnetic pn junction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(9): 6521-6526. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6521
    [10] Dong Zheng-Chao. Spin-polarized transport in ferromagnetic semiconductor/ferromagnetic d-wave superconductor tunnel junction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(9): 5937-5943. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5937
    [11] Li Zheng, Luo Jian-Lin. Superconducting proprties of noncentrosymmetric Mg10±δIr19B16?δ. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(7): 4508-4511. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4508
    [12] Ren Jun-Feng, Zhang Yu-Bin, Xie Shi-Jie. Current spin polarization in ferromagnetic/organic semiconductor/ferromagnetic system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(8): 4785-4790. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4785
    [13] Li Tong-Cang, Liu Zhi-Jing, Wang Ke-Yi. Calculations of the spin-polarization of the electronic current injected from a ferromagnetic metal into a semiconductor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(11): 2912-2917. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2912
    [14] YANG HONG-SHUN, YU MIN, LI SHI-YAN, LI PENG-CHENG, CHAI YI SHENG, ZHANG LIANG, CHEN XIAN-HUI, CAO LIE-ZHAO. STUDY ON THE THERMOPOWER AND RESISTIVITY OF A NEW SUPERCONDUCTOR MgB2. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(6): 1197-1200. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1197
    [15] YANG XIANG-BO, LIU YOU-YAN. ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES OF Ni-Cr QUASILATTICE WITHOUT CENTRAL ROTATIONAL SYMMETRY. Acta Physica Sinica, 1994, 43(3): 416-423. doi: 10.7498/aps.43.416
    [16] GUO QI, REN ZHAN-MEI, LIAO CHANG-JUN, LIU SONG-HAO. SOLITON PROPAGATION IN OPTICAL WAVEGUIDES MADE OF MEDIA WITH NON-CENTRAL SYMMETRY. Acta Physica Sinica, 1992, 41(7): 1097-1105. doi: 10.7498/aps.41.1097
    [17] DING SHANG-WU, HOU LEI. POSSIBILITY OF BIPOLARONIC EXPLANATION FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTING TERNARY METAL OXIDE. Acta Physica Sinica, 1988, 37(7): 1180-1182. doi: 10.7498/aps.37.1180
    [18] TANG HUI, ZHANG LI-YUAN. THE PROXIMITY EFFECT BETWEEN A NONSIMPLE METAL WITH-U CENTERS AND A BCS SUPERCONDUCTOR (Ⅱ). Acta Physica Sinica, 1985, 34(1): 97-104. doi: 10.7498/aps.34.97
    [19] ZHANG LI-YUAN. THE PROXIMITY EFFECT BETWEEN A NONSIMPLE METAL WITH-U CENTERS AND A BCS SUPERCONDUCTOR (I). Acta Physica Sinica, 1983, 32(11): 1435-1442. doi: 10.7498/aps.32.1435
    [20] FAN HAI-FU, GU YUAN-XIN, XU ZHANG-BAO. ARTIFICIAL PHASE DEGENERATION IN THE DETERMINATION OF NON-CENTROSYMMETRIC STRUCTURES. Acta Physica Sinica, 1981, 30(12): 1582-1585. doi: 10.7498/aps.30.1582
  • 期刊类型引用(22)

    1. 田立良,池浩,党杰. 一种优化服务器电磁辐射性能的自动展频方法. 信息技术与信息化. 2023(05): 136-139 . 百度学术
    2. 孙会琴,王思飞,田铮. 孔阵腔体屏蔽效能BLT方程修正与拓展分析. 电光与控制. 2023(07): 100-105 . 百度学术
    3. 张晗,李常贤. 高频有损斜开孔腔体屏蔽效能研究. 微波学报. 2023(06): 12-17+34 . 百度学术
    4. 胡小龙,李常贤. 高速列车屏蔽线转移阻抗与屏蔽效能研究. 电子测量技术. 2022(05): 80-85 . 百度学术
    5. 张岩,田铮,王川川,杨清熙,王思飞. 双层腔体屏蔽效能随孔缝位置与数量变化规律研究. 电工技术学报. 2022(13): 3350-3360 . 百度学术
    6. 于海波,张茂强,张晓波,虞晓阳,熊杰,刘彬. 高集成电力电子设备外壳屏蔽效能评估. 安全与电磁兼容. 2021(01): 69-72+79 . 百度学术
    7. 公延飞,陈星彤,高超飞,孙剑. 一种快速预测有损腔体屏蔽效能和谐振模式的解析模型. 电工技术学报. 2021(08): 1569-1578 . 百度学术
    8. 叶志红,张杰,周健健,苟丹. 有耗介质层上多导体传输线的电磁耦合时域分析方法. 物理学报. 2020(06): 47-54 . 百度学术
    9. 马振洋,左晶,史春蕾,冯嘉诚,刘旭红. 机载电子设备屏蔽效能测试与优化. 航空学报. 2020(07): 226-233 . 百度学术
    10. 王金田,刘雪明,商宝莹,李志勇,穆晓彤. 一种计算任意形状孔缝平均电极化率密度的方法. 电子测量技术. 2019(03): 31-34 . 百度学术
    11. 王殿海,石成英,蔡星会,易昭湘. 有内置薄板腔体的HEMP屏蔽效能研究. 微波学报. 2019(01): 87-90 . 百度学术
    12. 白婉欣,李天乐,郭安琪,成睿琦,焦重庆. 平面波照射下无限大导体板上周期孔阵屏蔽效能的解析研究. 物理学报. 2019(10): 64-72 . 百度学术
    13. 阎芳,刘旭红,王鹏,马振洋,史春蕾,于新海,赵聪. 高强辐射场下不同孔阵的金属腔体屏蔽效能研究. 电光与控制. 2019(08): 90-94+100 . 百度学术
    14. 郝建红,公延飞,蒋璐行,范杰清. 内置电路板的复杂多腔体电磁串扰屏蔽效能的解析研究. 电工技术学报. 2018(03): 670-679 . 百度学术
    15. 郝建红,蒋璐行,范杰清,公延飞. 内置介质板的开孔箱体屏蔽效能电磁拓扑模型. 电工技术学报. 2017(09): 101-111 . 百度学术
    16. 陈珂,杜平安,任丹. 一种基于缝隙天线阻抗的带缝腔体谐振频率计算方法. 电子学报. 2017(01): 232-237 . 百度学术
    17. 高雪莲,马士杰,杨凯,李丹. 考虑高次模的孔缝腔体屏蔽效能计算方法. 高电压技术. 2017(10): 3344-3350 . 百度学术
    18. 刘宁,张如彬,金杰. 投弃式仪器数据传输信道时频响应求解方法. 电波科学学报. 2016(05): 1009-1015 . 百度学术
    19. 阚勇,闫丽萍,赵翔,周海京,刘强,黄卡玛. 基于电磁拓扑的多腔体屏蔽效能快速算法. 物理学报. 2016(03): 88-99 . 百度学术
    20. 张玉廷,李冉,高文军,吕争,张华. 等效导纳模型分析航天器VHF/UHF频段屏蔽效能. 宇航学报. 2016(11): 1392-1397 . 百度学术
    21. 陈珂,王丹丹,杜平安. 孔缝腔体电磁谐振特性的影响因素分析. 中国科技论文. 2016(20): 2307-2311 . 百度学术
    22. 罗静雯,杜平安,任丹,肖培. 基于BLT方程的双层腔体屏蔽效能计算方法. 强激光与粒子束. 2015(11): 166-171 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(16)

Metrics
  • Abstract views:  8413
  • PDF Downloads:  154
  • Cited By: 38
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  09 November 2018
  • Accepted Date:  22 November 2018
  • Published Online:  05 January 2019

/

返回文章
返回