电子在自旋-轨道耦合调制下磁受限半导体纳米结构中的传输时间及其自旋极化

温丽; 卢卯旺; 陈嘉丽; 陈赛艳; 曹雪丽; 张安琪

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20240285

摘要

通过考虑构筑在半导体GaAs/Al_xGa_1–xAs异质结上的磁受限半导体纳米结构中的塞曼效应和自旋-轨道耦合, 本文采用理论分析和数值计算相结合的方法研究了电子的传输时间与自旋极化. 利用矩阵对角化和改进的转移矩阵方法, 数值求解电子的薛定谔方程; 采用H.G. Winful理论求电子的居留时间, 并计算自旋极化率. 由于塞曼效应与自旋-轨道耦合, 电子的居留时间明显地与其自旋有关, 因此可在时间维度上分离自旋、实现半导体中电子的自旋极化. 因为半导体GaAs的有效g-因子很小, 电子自旋极化主要源于自旋-轨道耦合, 大约为塞曼效应引起的自旋极化的4倍. 由于电子的有效势与自旋-轨道耦合的强度有关, 电子的居留时间及其自旋极化可通过界面限制电场或应力工程进行有效调控. 这些有趣的结果不仅对半导体自旋注入具有参考价值, 而且还可为半导体自旋电子学器件应用提供时间电子自旋分裂器.

关键词:

Abstract

Because digital information in semiconductor spintronics is encoded, stored, processed, and transferred by electron spins instead of its charge, the operation of a spintronic device requires that electrons in semiconductors be spin polarized. But spin states of electrons in traditional semiconductor materials are usually degenerate, therefore, conventional semiconductors cannot be directly used to design spintronic devices. Thus, how to spin polarized electrons in ordinary semiconductors (also called spin injection) including its effective manipulation, has become an important direction of research. In physics, either Zeeman effect between electron spins and external magnetic fields or spin-orbit coupling of electron spins and its spatial momentums can be employed to achieve electron-spin polarization. According to these physical mechanisms, some effective schemes have been developed successfully, such as spin filtering, temporally separating electron-spins, and spatial separations of electron spins. Utilizing the combination of theoretical analysis and numerical calculation, transmission time is investigated by considering both Zeeman effect as well as Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit couplings for electron in magnetically confined semiconductor nanostructure, which is constructed on the GaAs/Al_xGa_1–xAs heterostructure. Schrödinger equation of an electron is numerically solved by matrix diagonalization and improved transfer-matrix method. Adopting H.G. Winful’s theory, dwell time of electron is calculated and spin polarization ratio is given. Due to Zeeman effect and spin-orbit coupling, dwell time of electron is obviously associated with the spins, which is used to separate electron-spins in time dimension and to realize spin polarization of electrons in semiconductors. Because the semiconductor GaAs has a small effective g-factor, which is about 4 times larger than that induced by Zeeman effect, electron-spin polarization originates mainly from spin-orbit coupling including Rashba and Dresselhaus types. Dwell time of electron and its spin polarization can be efficaciously modified by interfacial confining electric-field or strain engineering, because the effective potential of electron is related to spin-orbit coupling’s strength. These interesting findings not only have some references for spin injection into semiconductors, but also provide a controllable temporal electron-spin splitter for semiconductor spintronics device applications.

Keywords:

semiconductor spintronics /
magnetically confined semiconductor nanostructure /
spin-orbit coupling /
dwell time

作者及机构信息

桂林理工大学物理与电子信息工程学院, 桂林　541004

通信作者: 卢卯旺, maowanglu@glut.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11864009, 62164005)和广西自然科学基金(批准号: 2021JJB100053)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

College of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China

Corresponding author: Lu Mao-Wang, maowanglu@glut.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11864009, 62164005) and the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2021JJB110053).

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Wolf S A, Awschalom D D, Buhrman R A, Daughton J M, von Molnár S, Roukes M L, Chtchelkanova A Y, Treger D M 2001 Science 294 1488 Google Scholar
[2]	Žutíc I, Fabiam J, Sarma S Das 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 323 Google Scholar
[3]	Gong C, Zhang X 2019 Science 363 706 Google Scholar
[4]	Soumyanrayanan A, Reyren N, Fert A, Panagopoulos C 2016 Nature 539 509 Google Scholar
[5]	蒋龙兴, 李庆超, 张旭, 李京峰, 张静, 陈祖信, 曾敏, 吴昊 2024 物理学报 73 017505 Google Scholar Jiang L X, Li Q C, Zhang X, Li J F, Zhang J, Chen Z X, Zeng M, Wu H 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 017505 Google Scholar
[6]	Gurram M, Omar S, Wees B J V 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 248 Google Scholar
[7]	Zhu W K, Lin H L, Yan F G, Hu C, Wang Z A, Zhao L X, Deng Y C, Kudrynskyi Z R, Zhou T, Kovalyuk Z D, Zheng Y H, Patanè A, Žutić I, Li S S, Zheng H Z, Wang K Y 2021 Adv. Mater. 33 2104658 Google Scholar
[8]	Zhu W K, Xie S H, Lin H L, Zhang G J, Wu H, Hu T G, Wang Z A, Zhang X M, Xu J H, Wang Y J, Zheng Y H, Yan F G, Zhang J, Zhao L X, Patanè A, Zhang J, Chang H X, Wang K Y 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 128501 Google Scholar
[9]	Zhu W K, Zhu J M, Zhou T, Zhang X P, Lin H L, Cui Q R, Yan F G, Wang Z A, Deng Y C, Yang H X, Zhao L X, Žutić I, Belashchenko K D, Wang K Y 2023 Nat. Commun. 14 5371 Google Scholar
[10]	Kitchen D, Richardella A, Tang J M, Flatté M E, Yazdani A 2006 Nature 442 436 Google Scholar
[11]	贺亚萍, 陈明霞, 潘杰锋, 李冬, 林港钧, 黄新红 2023 物理学报 72 028503 Google Scholar He Y P, Chen M X, Pan J F, Li D, Lin G J, Huang X H 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 028503 Google Scholar
[12]	李春雷, 郑军, 王小明, 徐燕 2023 物理学报 72 227201 Google Scholar Li C L, Zheng J, Wang X M, Xu Y 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 227201 Google Scholar
[13]	Liu X H, Zhang G L, Kong Y H, Li A H, Fu X 2014 Appl. Surf. Sci. 313 545 Google Scholar
[14]	Wang L, Guo Y 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 205311 Google Scholar
[15]	Das S, Ghosh S, Kumar R, Bag A, Biswas D 2017 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 64 4650 Google Scholar
[16]	Kong Y H, Liu X H, Li A H, Gong Y J 2019 Vacuum 159 410 Google Scholar
[17]	Nogaret A 2010 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22 253201 Google Scholar
[18]	Hauge E H, Støvneng J A 1989 Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 917 Google Scholar
[19]	王瑞琴, 宫箭, 武建英, 陈军 2013 物理学报 62 087303 Google Scholar Wang R Q, Gong J, Wu J Y, Chen J 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 087303 Google Scholar
[20]	Winful H G 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 260401 Google Scholar
[21]	Zhai F, Guo Y, Gu B L 2002 Eur. Phys. J. B 29 147 Google Scholar
[22]	Xu H Z, Liu P J, Zhang Y F 2003 Phys. Status Solidi B 240 169 Google Scholar
[23]	Chen S Y, Zhang G L, Cao X L, Peng F F 2021 J. Comput. Electron. 20 785 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhang G L, Lu M W, Chen S Y, Peng F F, Meng J S 2021 IEEE Trans. Magn. 57 1400305
[25]	Guo Q M, Lu M W, Huang X H, Yang S Q, Qin Y J 2021 Vacuum 186 110059 Google Scholar
[26]	Xie S S, Lu M W, Huang X H, Wen L, Chen J L 2023 Phys. Lett. A 480 128976 Google Scholar
[27]	Guo Q M, Lu M W, Yang S Q, Qin Y J, Xie S S 2022 Braz. J. Phys. 52 74 Google Scholar
[28]	Lu M W, Chen S Y, Cao X L , Huang X H 2021 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 68 860
[29]	Capasso F, Mohammed K, Cho A Y, Hull R, Hutchinson A L 1985 Appl. Phys. Lett. 47 420 Google Scholar
[30]	Lu M W, Chen S Y, Cao X L, Huang X H 2020 Results Phys. 19 103375 Google Scholar
[31]	Chen S Y, Cao X L, Huang X H, Lu M W 2023 Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138 111 Google Scholar
[32]	Xie S S, Lu M W, Huang X H, Wen L, Chen J L 2023 Results Phys. 51 106605 Google Scholar
[33]	Guo Q M, Chen S Y, Cao X L, Yang S Q 2021 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 36 055013 Google Scholar
[34]	Guo Q M, Lu M W, Yang S Q, Qin Y J, Xie S S 2022 J. Nanoelectron. Optoe. 16 1554
[35]	Chen S Y, Lu M W, Cao X L 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 017201 Google Scholar
[36]	Lu M W, Chen S Y, Zhang G L, Huang X H 2018 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 65 3045 Google Scholar
[37]	Rashba E I, Efros A L 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 126405 Google Scholar
[38]	Schliemann J, Loss D 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 165311 Google Scholar
[39]	Bindel J R, Pezzotta M, Ulrich J, Liebmamm M, sheman E Y, Morgenstern M 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 920 Google Scholar
[40]	Intronati G A, Tamborenea P I, Weinmann D A, Jarabert R A 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 016601 Google Scholar
[41]	Xie S S, Lu M W, Chen S Y, Qin Y J, Wen L, Chen J L 2023 Commun. Theor. Phys. 75 015703 Google Scholar
[42]	von Bergmann K, Heinze S, Bode M, Vedmedenko E Y, Bihlmayer G, Blügel S, Wiesendanger R 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 167203 Google Scholar
[43]	Lu M W, Chen S Y, Zhang G L 2017 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 64 1825 Google Scholar
[44]	You J Q, Zhang L D, Ghosh P K 1995 Phys. Rev. B 52 17243 Google Scholar
[45]	Lu M W, Chen S Y, Zhang G L, Huang X H 2018 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 30 145302 Google Scholar
[46]	Lu K Y, He Z Y, Zu M M, Guo S Y 2022 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 43 1645 Google Scholar
[47]	Lu K Y, He Z Y, Zu M M, Guo S Y, Lu M W 2023 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 44 1424 Google Scholar
[48]	Rusetsky V S, Golyashov V A, Eremeev S V, Kusdov D A, Rusinov I P, Shamirzaev T S, Mironov A V, Demin A Yu, Tereshchenko O E 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 166802 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 真实MCSN结构(a)及其模型(b), 图中垂直磁化的铁磁(FM)条带沉积在GaAs/Al_xGa_1–xAs异质结的表面, d、h和$ {M_0} $分别是FM条带的宽度、厚度和磁化强度, z₀表示FM条带与2DEG之间的距离, 结构的两端分别位于x_–和x₊处, B_z(x)是FM条带在2DEG平面内产生的磁场

Fig. 1. The MCSN device(a)and its model(b), where a vertically magnetized ferromagnetic (FM) stripe is patterned in the surface of GaAs/Al_xGa_1–xAs heterostructure, d, h, $ {\vec M_0} $, x_- and x₊ are width, thickness, magnetization, left position and right end, respectively, z₀ represents the distance between FM stripe and 2DEG, and B_z(x) is magnetic field induced by FM stripe within 2DEG.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 仅考虑塞曼效应时, 自旋向上电子和自旋向下电子在真实MCSN结构中的居留时间及其自旋极化(在插图中)随着入射能的变化, 图中电子的横向波矢取为k_y = 0(垂直入射)

Fig. 2. When only Zeeman effect is involved, dwell time changes with incident energy for spin-up (up-triangle curve) and spin-down (down-triangle curve) electrons in the MCSN, respectively, where spin polarization ratio defined by dwell time is presented in the inset and transverse wave vector of electron is chosen as k_y = 0 (i.e., the normal incidence).

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 只考虑Rashba型SOC耦合　(a) 自旋向上和自旋向下电子在真实MCSN结构中的居留时间及其自旋极化(在插图中)随着入射能量的变化, 其中Rashba-SOC耦合的强度为$\eta_{\mathrm{R}} $ = 0.2; (b)当入射能量分别为E = 3.0, 5.0, 7.0时, 自旋极化随着Rashba-SOC耦合强度的变化; 图中电子的横向波矢取为k_y = 0

Fig. 3. Only Rashba-SOC effect is considered: (a) Dwell time and spin polarization ratio (in the inset) vary with incident energy for spin-up and spin-down electrons in the MCSN, where Rashba-SOC strength is chosen as $\eta_{\mathrm{R}} $ = 0.2; (b) spin polarization ratio changes with Rashba-SOC strength for incident energy E = 3.0, 5.0, 7.0; and transverse wave vector is set to be k_y = 0.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 仅计及Dresselhaus型SOC效应　(a) 自旋向上和自旋向下电子在真实MCSN结构的居留时间及其自旋极化(在插图中)随着入射能量的变化, 其中Dresselhaus-SOC耦合的强度为$\eta_{\mathrm{D}} $ = 0.2; (b)当入射能量分别为E = 3.0, 5.0, 7.0时, 自旋极化随着Dresselhaus-SOC强度的变化; 图中电子的横向波矢取为k_y = 0

Fig. 4. Only Dresselhaus-SOC effect is considered: (a) Dwell time and spin polarization ratio (in the inset) vary with incident energy for spin-up and spin-down electrons in the MCSN, where Dresselhaus-SOC strength is chosen as $\eta_{\mathrm{D}} $ = 0.2; (b) spin polarization ratio changes with Dresselhaus-SOC strength for incident energy E = 3.0, 5.0, 7.0; and transverse wave vector is set to be k_y = 0.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

[1]	Wolf S A, Awschalom D D, Buhrman R A, Daughton J M, von Molnár S, Roukes M L, Chtchelkanova A Y, Treger D M 2001 Science 294 1488 Google Scholar
[2]	Žutíc I, Fabiam J, Sarma S Das 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 323 Google Scholar
[3]	Gong C, Zhang X 2019 Science 363 706 Google Scholar
[4]	Soumyanrayanan A, Reyren N, Fert A, Panagopoulos C 2016 Nature 539 509 Google Scholar
[5]	蒋龙兴, 李庆超, 张旭, 李京峰, 张静, 陈祖信, 曾敏, 吴昊 2024 物理学报 73 017505 Google Scholar Jiang L X, Li Q C, Zhang X, Li J F, Zhang J, Chen Z X, Zeng M, Wu H 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 017505 Google Scholar
[6]	Gurram M, Omar S, Wees B J V 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 248 Google Scholar
[7]	Zhu W K, Lin H L, Yan F G, Hu C, Wang Z A, Zhao L X, Deng Y C, Kudrynskyi Z R, Zhou T, Kovalyuk Z D, Zheng Y H, Patanè A, Žutić I, Li S S, Zheng H Z, Wang K Y 2021 Adv. Mater. 33 2104658 Google Scholar
[8]	Zhu W K, Xie S H, Lin H L, Zhang G J, Wu H, Hu T G, Wang Z A, Zhang X M, Xu J H, Wang Y J, Zheng Y H, Yan F G, Zhang J, Zhao L X, Patanè A, Zhang J, Chang H X, Wang K Y 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 128501 Google Scholar
[9]	Zhu W K, Zhu J M, Zhou T, Zhang X P, Lin H L, Cui Q R, Yan F G, Wang Z A, Deng Y C, Yang H X, Zhao L X, Žutić I, Belashchenko K D, Wang K Y 2023 Nat. Commun. 14 5371 Google Scholar
[10]	Kitchen D, Richardella A, Tang J M, Flatté M E, Yazdani A 2006 Nature 442 436 Google Scholar
[11]	贺亚萍, 陈明霞, 潘杰锋, 李冬, 林港钧, 黄新红 2023 物理学报 72 028503 Google Scholar He Y P, Chen M X, Pan J F, Li D, Lin G J, Huang X H 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 028503 Google Scholar
[12]	李春雷, 郑军, 王小明, 徐燕 2023 物理学报 72 227201 Google Scholar Li C L, Zheng J, Wang X M, Xu Y 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 227201 Google Scholar
[13]	Liu X H, Zhang G L, Kong Y H, Li A H, Fu X 2014 Appl. Surf. Sci. 313 545 Google Scholar
[14]	Wang L, Guo Y 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 205311 Google Scholar
[15]	Das S, Ghosh S, Kumar R, Bag A, Biswas D 2017 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 64 4650 Google Scholar
[16]	Kong Y H, Liu X H, Li A H, Gong Y J 2019 Vacuum 159 410 Google Scholar
[17]	Nogaret A 2010 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22 253201 Google Scholar
[18]	Hauge E H, Støvneng J A 1989 Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 917 Google Scholar
[19]	王瑞琴, 宫箭, 武建英, 陈军 2013 物理学报 62 087303 Google Scholar Wang R Q, Gong J, Wu J Y, Chen J 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 087303 Google Scholar
[20]	Winful H G 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 260401 Google Scholar
[21]	Zhai F, Guo Y, Gu B L 2002 Eur. Phys. J. B 29 147 Google Scholar
[22]	Xu H Z, Liu P J, Zhang Y F 2003 Phys. Status Solidi B 240 169 Google Scholar
[23]	Chen S Y, Zhang G L, Cao X L, Peng F F 2021 J. Comput. Electron. 20 785 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhang G L, Lu M W, Chen S Y, Peng F F, Meng J S 2021 IEEE Trans. Magn. 57 1400305
[25]	Guo Q M, Lu M W, Huang X H, Yang S Q, Qin Y J 2021 Vacuum 186 110059 Google Scholar
[26]	Xie S S, Lu M W, Huang X H, Wen L, Chen J L 2023 Phys. Lett. A 480 128976 Google Scholar
[27]	Guo Q M, Lu M W, Yang S Q, Qin Y J, Xie S S 2022 Braz. J. Phys. 52 74 Google Scholar
[28]	Lu M W, Chen S Y, Cao X L , Huang X H 2021 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 68 860
[29]	Capasso F, Mohammed K, Cho A Y, Hull R, Hutchinson A L 1985 Appl. Phys. Lett. 47 420 Google Scholar
[30]	Lu M W, Chen S Y, Cao X L, Huang X H 2020 Results Phys. 19 103375 Google Scholar
[31]	Chen S Y, Cao X L, Huang X H, Lu M W 2023 Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138 111 Google Scholar
[32]	Xie S S, Lu M W, Huang X H, Wen L, Chen J L 2023 Results Phys. 51 106605 Google Scholar
[33]	Guo Q M, Chen S Y, Cao X L, Yang S Q 2021 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 36 055013 Google Scholar
[34]	Guo Q M, Lu M W, Yang S Q, Qin Y J, Xie S S 2022 J. Nanoelectron. Optoe. 16 1554
[35]	Chen S Y, Lu M W, Cao X L 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 017201 Google Scholar
[36]	Lu M W, Chen S Y, Zhang G L, Huang X H 2018 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 65 3045 Google Scholar
[37]	Rashba E I, Efros A L 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 126405 Google Scholar
[38]	Schliemann J, Loss D 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 165311 Google Scholar
[39]	Bindel J R, Pezzotta M, Ulrich J, Liebmamm M, sheman E Y, Morgenstern M 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 920 Google Scholar
[40]	Intronati G A, Tamborenea P I, Weinmann D A, Jarabert R A 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 016601 Google Scholar
[41]	Xie S S, Lu M W, Chen S Y, Qin Y J, Wen L, Chen J L 2023 Commun. Theor. Phys. 75 015703 Google Scholar
[42]	von Bergmann K, Heinze S, Bode M, Vedmedenko E Y, Bihlmayer G, Blügel S, Wiesendanger R 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 167203 Google Scholar
[43]	Lu M W, Chen S Y, Zhang G L 2017 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 64 1825 Google Scholar
[44]	You J Q, Zhang L D, Ghosh P K 1995 Phys. Rev. B 52 17243 Google Scholar
[45]	Lu M W, Chen S Y, Zhang G L, Huang X H 2018 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 30 145302 Google Scholar
[46]	Lu K Y, He Z Y, Zu M M, Guo S Y 2022 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 43 1645 Google Scholar
[47]	Lu K Y, He Z Y, Zu M M, Guo S Y, Lu M W 2023 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 44 1424 Google Scholar
[48]	Rusetsky V S, Golyashov V A, Eremeev S V, Kusdov D A, Rusinov I P, Shamirzaev T S, Mironov A V, Demin A Yu, Tereshchenko O E 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 166802 Google Scholar

[1]	刘铭婕, 田亚莉, 王瑜, 李晓筱, 和小虎, 宫廷, 孙小聪, 郭古青, 邱选兵, 李传亮. 含自旋-轨道耦合的O^-₂光谱常数计算. 物理学报, 2025, 74(2): . doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241435
[2]	王欢, 贺夏瑶, 李帅, 刘博. 非线性相互作用的自旋-轨道耦合玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体的淬火动力学. 物理学报, 2023, 72(10): 100309. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222401
[3]	李新月, 祁娟娟, 赵敦, 刘伍明. 自旋-轨道耦合二分量玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚系统的孤子解. 物理学报, 2023, 72(10): 106701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222319
[4]	高建华, 黄旭光, 梁作堂, 王群, 王新年. 强相互作用自旋-轨道耦合与夸克-胶子等离子体整体极化. 物理学报, 2023, 72(7): 072501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230102
[5]	袁家望, 陈立, 张云波. 自旋-轨道耦合玻色爱因斯坦凝聚中多能级绝热消除理论. 物理学报, 2023, 72(21): 216701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231052
[6]	贺亚萍, 陈明霞, 潘杰锋, 李冬, 林港钧, 黄新红. Rashba自旋-轨道耦合调制的单层半导体纳米结构中电子的自旋极化效应. 物理学报, 2023, 72(2): 028503. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221381
[7]	马赟娥, 乔鑫, 高瑞, 梁俊成, 张爱霞, 薛具奎. 可调自旋-轨道耦合玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体的隧穿动力学. 物理学报, 2022, 71(21): 210302. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220697
[8]	周永香, 薛迅. 自旋-轨道耦合系统的电子涡旋. 物理学报, 2022, 71(21): 210301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220751
[9]	高峰, 张红, 张常哲, 赵文丽, 孟庆田. SiH⁺(X¹Σ⁺)的势能曲线、光谱常数、振转能级和自旋-轨道耦合理论研究. 物理学报, 2021, 70(15): 153301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210450
[10]	李吉, 刘斌, 白晶, 王寰宇, 何天琛. 环形势阱中自旋-轨道耦合旋转玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体的基态. 物理学报, 2020, 69(14): 140301. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200372
[11]	梁世恒, 陆沅, 韩秀峰. 自旋发光二极管研究进展. 物理学报, 2020, 69(20): 208501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200866
[12]	文林, 梁毅, 周晶, 余鹏, 夏雷, 牛连斌, 张晓斐. 线性塞曼劈裂对自旋-轨道耦合玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体中亮孤子动力学的影响. 物理学报, 2019, 68(8): 080301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182013
[13]	李吉, 刘伍明. 梯度磁场中自旋-轨道耦合旋转两分量玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体的基态研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(11): 110302. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180539
[14]	贺丽, 余增强. 自旋-轨道耦合作用下玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚在量子相变附近的朗道临界速度. 物理学报, 2017, 66(22): 220301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.220301
[15]	黄珍, 曾文, 古艺, 刘利, 周鲁, 张卫平. 自旋-轨道耦合下冷原子的双反射. 物理学报, 2016, 65(16): 164201. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.164201
[16]	贺丽, 余增强. 自旋-轨道耦合作用下双组分量子气体中的动力学结构因子与求和规则. 物理学报, 2016, 65(13): 131101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.131101
[17]	曾绍龙, 李玲, 谢征微. 双自旋过滤隧道结中的隧穿时间. 物理学报, 2016, 65(22): 227302. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.227302
[18]	李志, 曹辉. 自旋轨道耦合玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体在尖端势垒散射中的Klein隧穿. 物理学报, 2014, 63(11): 110306. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.110306
[19]	李志, 王建忠. 自旋-轨道耦合玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚势垒散射特性的研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(10): 100306. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.100306
[20]	李瑞, 闫冰, 赵书涛, 郭庆群, 连科研, 田传进, 潘守甫. CH3I分子的光解离的自旋-轨道从头计算. 物理学报, 2008, 57(7): 4130-4133. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4130

计量

文章访问数: 1690
PDF下载量: 85
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

电子在自旋-轨道耦合调制下磁受限半导体纳米结构中的传输时间及其自旋极化