-
In this work, the competitive adsorption behavior of H2 and CO on strained Fe(110) are investigated by the first-principles method based on the spin-polarized density functional theory to study the hydrogen embrittlement of steels. The results show that the most stable adsorption site for CO is top site, and the orbital of CO molecule hybridizing with Fe 3p and 4s states illustrates a strong electronic interaction between them. The adsorption energy values of CO at the four calculated adsorption sites are more negative than those of H2, which favors the binding with Fe(110) surface. The potential energy variations for CO and H2 molecules close to the surface are calculated. The attractive force of the Fe(110) surface acting on CO in 1.5–3 Å is greater than that acting on H2. The pre-adsorbed CO increases the dissociation energy barrier of H2 from 0.08 eV to 0.13 eV but reduces the force between H2 and surface. The surface tensile strain enhances the interaction between hydrogen and Fe(110), which, however, is reduced by the compressive strain. The opposite tendency is found in the adsorption of CO. The binding strength of CO is stronger than that of H2 on the strained Fe(110) surface. The difference in adsorption energy between CO and H2 decreases with tensile strain increasing. The effect of surface strain and partial pressure of CO gas phase on the surface coverage ratio of H atom are also calculated quantitatively based on thermodynamics at 298 K, with the partial pressure of H2 set to be 10 MPa. The surface ratio of the H atom decreases with partial pressure of CO increasing. The hydrogen coverage drops nearly to zero when the partial pressure of CO reaches a certain value. This result reveals that CO can inhibit hydrogen adsorption on Fe surface. In the case where the surface ratio of hydrogen decreases to 1%, the corresponding CO partial pressures are 105 Pa, 1.1 × 103 Pa, 2.4 × 105 Pa on –2%, 0, 2% strained Fe(110) surface, respectively. High CO partial pressure is needed to suppress the hydrogen adsorption since the binding strength of CO is close to that of H2 on the expanded surface.
[1] Liu Z, Han H, Xiang C 2018 Energ. Policy 115 92
Google Scholar
[2] Gorji T B, Ranjbar A A, Mirzababaei S N 2015 Sol. Energy 119 332
Google Scholar
[3] Mahian O, Kianifar A, Kalogirou S A, Pop I, Wongwises S 2013 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 57 582
Google Scholar
[4] Sherif S A, Barbir F, Veziroglu T N 2005 Sol. Energy 78 647
Google Scholar
[5] 舟丹 2017 中外能源 22 16
Zhou D 2017 Sin. Glo Energ. 22 16
[6] Dodds P E, Mcdowall W 2013 Energ. Policy 60 305
Google Scholar
[7] Briottet L, Batisse R, Dinechin A 2012 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 9423
Google Scholar
[8] Nanninga N, Slifka A, Levy Y 2010 J. Res. Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol. 115 437
Google Scholar
[9] Kim C M, Kim Y P, Kim W S 2017 J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 31 3691
Google Scholar
[10] Zhao W, Min Y, Zhang T, Deng Q, Jiang W, Jiang W 2018 Corros. Sci. 133 251
Google Scholar
[11] Goikoetxea I, Juaristi J, Muino R D 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 066103
Google Scholar
[12] Jeon J, Yu B D, Hyun S 2016 J. Kor. Phy. Soc. 69 1776
Google Scholar
[13] Yang L, Shu D J, Li S C 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 14833
[14] Huo C, Li Y W, Wang J G 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 14160
Google Scholar
[15] Dan C S 2005 Catal. Today 105 44
Google Scholar
[16] Kunisada Y, Sakaguchi N 2015 J. Jap. Ins. Met. A 79 447
Google Scholar
[17] Amaya R S, Linares D H, Duarte H A 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 10830
[18] Huo C F, Liao X Y 2007 J. Phys. Chem. C 111 4305
Google Scholar
[19] Bernasek S L, Zappone M, Jiang P 1992 Surf. Sci. 272 53
Google Scholar
[20] Wang T, Tian X X, Yang Y, Li Y W, Wang J G, Beller M, Jiao H J 2016 Catal. Today 261 82
Google Scholar
[21] Huo C F, Ren J, Li Y W 2007 J. Catal. 249 174
Google Scholar
[22] Burke M L, Madix R J 1990 Surf. Sci. 237 20
Google Scholar
[23] Xie W, Peng L, Peng D 2014 Appl. Surf. Sci. 296 47
Google Scholar
[24] 潘金生, 田民波 2011 材料科学基础 (北京: 清华大学出版社出版) 第156页
Pan J S, Tian M B 2011 Fundamentals of Material Science (Beijing: Tsinghua University Press) p156 (in Chinese)
[25] Clark S J, Segall M D, Pickard C J,Hasnip P J, Probert M I J, Refson K, Payne M C 2005 Z. Kristallogr. 220 567
Google Scholar
[26] 张凤春, 李春福, 文平 2014 物理学报 63 197101
Google Scholar
Zhang F C, Li C F, Wen P 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 197101
Google Scholar
[27] 王明军, 李春福, 文平, 张凤春, 王垚, 刘恩佐 2016 物理学报 65 037101
Google Scholar
Wang M J, Li C F, Wen P, Zhang F C, Wang Y, Liu E Z 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 037101
Google Scholar
[28] Chase M W 1998 NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables (4th Ed.) (New York: The American Institute of Physics for The National Institute of Standards and Technology) p641
[29] Kuwabara A, Saito Y, Koyama Y 2008 Mater. Trans. 49 2484
Google Scholar
[30] Chen Y H 2005 M. S. Thesis (Guangzhou: Ji'nan University) (in Chinese)
[31] Jiang D E, Carter E A 2004 Surf. Sci. 570 167
Google Scholar
[32] Moon D W, Cameron S, Zaera F, Eberhardt W, Carr R, Bernasek L, Gland J L, Dwyer J 1987 Surf. Sci. 180 L123
[33] Wang H, Nie X, Guo X, Song C S 2016 J. CO2 Uti. 15 107
Google Scholar
[34] Gholizadeh R, Yu Y X 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 357 1187
Google Scholar
[35] Staykov A, Yamabe J, Somerday B P 2014 Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114 626
Google Scholar
-
图 1 Fe(110)面及其对称点
Figure 1. Fe(110) surface and high symmetry sites.
图 2 CO, Fe(110)面及其top位吸附前后分波态密度图 (a)吸附前; (b)吸附后
Figure 2. Projected local density of states from Fe on clean Fe surface and a CO molecular in vacuum (a) and with a CO adsorbed surface (b).
图 3 H与Fe(110)面tf位吸附前后分波态密度图 (a)吸附前; (b)吸附后
Figure 3. Projected local density of states from Fe on clean Fe surface and a H atom in vacuum (a) and with a H adsorbed surface (b).
图 4 CO与H2吸附过程中的势能变化
Figure 4. Potential energy variations of CO and H2 moving towards Fe(110).
图 5 CO吸附能、H2吸附能和应变之间的关系
Figure 5. Relationship between adsorption energy of CO and H2 and strain.
图 6 H2和CO吸附能的差与应变之间的关系
Figure 6. Relationship between strain and the difference of CO and H2 adsorption energy.
图 7 CO的分压与θH之间的关系
Figure 7. Relationship between CO pressure and coverage of H
-
[1] Liu Z, Han H, Xiang C 2018 Energ. Policy 115 92
Google Scholar
[2] Gorji T B, Ranjbar A A, Mirzababaei S N 2015 Sol. Energy 119 332
Google Scholar
[3] Mahian O, Kianifar A, Kalogirou S A, Pop I, Wongwises S 2013 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 57 582
Google Scholar
[4] Sherif S A, Barbir F, Veziroglu T N 2005 Sol. Energy 78 647
Google Scholar
[5] 舟丹 2017 中外能源 22 16
Zhou D 2017 Sin. Glo Energ. 22 16
[6] Dodds P E, Mcdowall W 2013 Energ. Policy 60 305
Google Scholar
[7] Briottet L, Batisse R, Dinechin A 2012 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 9423
Google Scholar
[8] Nanninga N, Slifka A, Levy Y 2010 J. Res. Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol. 115 437
Google Scholar
[9] Kim C M, Kim Y P, Kim W S 2017 J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 31 3691
Google Scholar
[10] Zhao W, Min Y, Zhang T, Deng Q, Jiang W, Jiang W 2018 Corros. Sci. 133 251
Google Scholar
[11] Goikoetxea I, Juaristi J, Muino R D 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 066103
Google Scholar
[12] Jeon J, Yu B D, Hyun S 2016 J. Kor. Phy. Soc. 69 1776
Google Scholar
[13] Yang L, Shu D J, Li S C 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 14833
[14] Huo C, Li Y W, Wang J G 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 14160
Google Scholar
[15] Dan C S 2005 Catal. Today 105 44
Google Scholar
[16] Kunisada Y, Sakaguchi N 2015 J. Jap. Ins. Met. A 79 447
Google Scholar
[17] Amaya R S, Linares D H, Duarte H A 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 10830
[18] Huo C F, Liao X Y 2007 J. Phys. Chem. C 111 4305
Google Scholar
[19] Bernasek S L, Zappone M, Jiang P 1992 Surf. Sci. 272 53
Google Scholar
[20] Wang T, Tian X X, Yang Y, Li Y W, Wang J G, Beller M, Jiao H J 2016 Catal. Today 261 82
Google Scholar
[21] Huo C F, Ren J, Li Y W 2007 J. Catal. 249 174
Google Scholar
[22] Burke M L, Madix R J 1990 Surf. Sci. 237 20
Google Scholar
[23] Xie W, Peng L, Peng D 2014 Appl. Surf. Sci. 296 47
Google Scholar
[24] 潘金生, 田民波 2011 材料科学基础 (北京: 清华大学出版社出版) 第156页
Pan J S, Tian M B 2011 Fundamentals of Material Science (Beijing: Tsinghua University Press) p156 (in Chinese)
[25] Clark S J, Segall M D, Pickard C J,Hasnip P J, Probert M I J, Refson K, Payne M C 2005 Z. Kristallogr. 220 567
Google Scholar
[26] 张凤春, 李春福, 文平 2014 物理学报 63 197101
Google Scholar
Zhang F C, Li C F, Wen P 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 197101
Google Scholar
[27] 王明军, 李春福, 文平, 张凤春, 王垚, 刘恩佐 2016 物理学报 65 037101
Google Scholar
Wang M J, Li C F, Wen P, Zhang F C, Wang Y, Liu E Z 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 037101
Google Scholar
[28] Chase M W 1998 NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables (4th Ed.) (New York: The American Institute of Physics for The National Institute of Standards and Technology) p641
[29] Kuwabara A, Saito Y, Koyama Y 2008 Mater. Trans. 49 2484
Google Scholar
[30] Chen Y H 2005 M. S. Thesis (Guangzhou: Ji'nan University) (in Chinese)
[31] Jiang D E, Carter E A 2004 Surf. Sci. 570 167
Google Scholar
[32] Moon D W, Cameron S, Zaera F, Eberhardt W, Carr R, Bernasek L, Gland J L, Dwyer J 1987 Surf. Sci. 180 L123
[33] Wang H, Nie X, Guo X, Song C S 2016 J. CO2 Uti. 15 107
Google Scholar
[34] Gholizadeh R, Yu Y X 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 357 1187
Google Scholar
[35] Staykov A, Yamabe J, Somerday B P 2014 Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114 626
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 11796
- PDF Downloads: 229
- Cited By: 0
